about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,330 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Jet fuel used in Venezuela and the second variable is Season wins for the Tennessee Titans.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The fumes from the extra jet fuel created a haze over the Tennessee Titans' stadium, leading to decreased visibility and confusing the players. This ultimately resulted in a higher number of fumbles, incomplete passes, and overall poor performance on the field. Additionally, the strange scent of the jet fuel may have disrupted the Titans' ability to focus and coordinate their plays effectively. It seems like the Titans just couldn't soar to victory with all that extra jet fuel madness going on!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in a style reminiscent of a black-and-white newspaper illustration, depicting a scene in the town square of Caracas. In the center of the image, depict a group of workers carefully refueling a small propeller plane with locally-produced jet fuel. Adjacent to this activity, place a banner proudly displaying the number of wins the Tennessee Titans have achieved in the current football season. The juxtaposition of the fueling activity and the celebratory sports banner should illustrate the two variables in a clear visual manner. Ensure that the image has a simple yet impactful composition, with no words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because as Jet fuel use decreased in Venezuela, the Titans' overconfident opponents started flying to games on homemade propeller planes, leading to distractingly loud landings and easy wins for the Titans.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk a Polaroid photo Realistic A black-and-white newspaper illustration Vaporwave
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the town square of Caracas, a group of workers carefully refuels a small propeller plane with locally-produced jet fuel, while nearby, a banner proudly displays the number of wins the Tennessee Titans have achieved in the current football season. The juxtaposition of the fueling activity and the celebratory sports banner illustrates the two variables in a clear visual manner.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In the town square of Caracas, a group of workers carefully refuels a small propeller plane with locally-produced jet fuel, while nearby, a banner proudly displays the number of wins the Tennessee Titans have achieved in the current football season. The juxtaposition of the fueling activity and the celebratory sports banner illustrates the two variables in a clear visual manner. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in a style reminiscent of a black-and-white newspaper illustration, depicting a scene in the town square of Caracas. In the center of the image, depict a group of workers carefully refueling a small propeller plane with locally-produced jet fuel. Adjacent to this activity, place a banner proudly displaying the number of wins the Tennessee Titans have achieved in the current football season. The juxtaposition of the fueling activity and the celebratory sports banner should illustrate the two variables in a clear visual manner. Ensure that the image has a simple yet impactful composition, with no words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Jet fuel used in Venezuela negatively influenced Season wins for the Tennessee Titans.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans

The Journal of Sports Psychology and Performance Enhancement

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of -0.7846700 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the famous saying goes, "fuel for thought" takes on a whole new meaning in this research study. We are delving into the intriguing and often overlooked intersection of jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL. This unlikely pairing has raised more than a few eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and football enthusiasts alike. The goal of this study is to uncover the mysterious connection between these seemingly disparate variables and to explore the statistical relationship between them. It's certainly a touchdown in the realm of unexpected statistical phenomena!

Now, before we dive headfirst into the data, let's take a moment for a relevant dad joke: How do statisticians summon good luck? They use a bayesian clover! Speaking of luck, we firmly believe that there's a scientific method behind the Titans' wins and the flow of jet fuel, one that extends beyond mere coincidence.

The correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' performance may seem as puzzling as a misplaced puzzle piece, but as we unravel the data, it becomes clear that there's more than meets the eye. This unexpected relationship may hold the key to unlocking intriguing insights and could potentially fuel further discussion and research in the realms of sports and global energy patterns. It's a statistical plot twist worthy of the biggest silver screen blockbuster!

But wait, let's not forget another dad joke: What did the Tennessee Titans say to the jet fuel in Venezuela? "You really know how to ignite our success!" It seems that even statistical oddities have a sense of humor. As we venture into this unexplored statistical terrain, we remain committed to unraveling the enchanting mystery behind this bizarre correlation.

In the next sections, we will dissect the data, explore potential theoretical frameworks, and discuss the implications of our findings. Stay tuned for an academic adventure that blends the rigors of scientific inquiry with the delightful absurdity of unexpected statistical connections. After all, in the world of research, truth is often stranger than fiction!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "fuel for thought" takes on a whole new meaning in this research study. We are delving into the intriguing and often overlooked intersection of jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL. This unlikely pairing has raised more than a few eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and football enthusiasts alike. The goal of this study is to uncover the mysterious connection between these seemingly disparate variables and to explore the statistical relationship between them. It's certainly a touchdown in the realm of unexpected statistical phenomena!
Now, before we dive headfirst into the data, let's take a moment for a relevant dad joke: How do statisticians summon good luck? They use a bayesian clover! Speaking of luck, we firmly believe that there's a scientific method behind the Titans' wins and the flow of jet fuel, one that extends beyond mere coincidence.
The correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' performance may seem as puzzling as a misplaced puzzle piece, but as we unravel the data, it becomes clear that there's more than meets the eye. This unexpected relationship may hold the key to unlocking intriguing insights and could potentially fuel further discussion and research in the realms of sports and global energy patterns. It's a statistical plot twist worthy of the biggest silver screen blockbuster!
But wait, let's not forget another dad joke: What did the Tennessee Titans say to the jet fuel in Venezuela? "You really know how to ignite our success!" It seems that even statistical oddities have a sense of humor. As we venture into this unexplored statistical terrain, we remain committed to unraveling the enchanting mystery behind this bizarre correlation.
In the next sections, we will dissect the data, explore potential theoretical frameworks, and discuss the implications of our findings. Stay tuned for an academic adventure that blends the rigors of scientific inquiry with the delightful absurdity of unexpected statistical connections. After all, in the world of research, truth is often stranger than fiction!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The peculiar relationship between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal performance of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL has captivated researchers and football enthusiasts alike. As we embark on this journey of statistical whimsy, it is essential to review the existing literature and unearth potential antecedents that may shed light on this inexplicable correlation.

In "Fuel Matters: The Impact of Jet Fuel Supply on Global Energy Dynamics," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate web of global energy patterns, examining the influence of jet fuel consumption on various economic and industrial sectors. Lorem, the authors stress the pivotal role of jet fuel in shaping international energy landscapes, yet surprisingly, they omit any mention of its potential effect on NFL team victories.

It seems that this unexpected connection may have slipped under the radar of traditional energy analyses, akin to a football fumble in the midst of a crucial game. In "Winning Strategies: Unconventional Pathways to Victory," Jones and Smith explore the multifaceted nature of success in competitive environments. Ipsum, the authors illuminate unconventional routes to triumph, yet curiously, the potential impact of jet fuel on professional football remains uncharted territory within their discourse.

Now, let's take a moment for a dad joke that resonates with the topic at hand: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything – much like the mysterious influence of jet fuel on the Titans' wins, isn't it?

As we dig deeper into the literature, it becomes evident that the connection between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' seasonal victories unveils a narrative that transcends conventional statistical analyses. However, we must not dismiss the potential wisdom embedded in sources beyond traditional academic research.

In "Fueling the Team: A Case Study of Unlikely Catalysts for Sporting Success," the real-life account of underdog triumphs in professional sports offers compelling parallels to our research topic. Similarly, "Tales of Victorious Voyages: Mythic Journeys and the Arcane Forces that Propel Them," provides narrative insights that echo the whimsical nature of our statistical inquiry – and possibly the Titans' unexpected triumphs.

It is crucial to consider the sheer breadth of literature that encompasses offbeat connections and improbable victories. To that end, we may find unexpected inspiration from children's shows and cartoons, such as "The Jetsons," for insights into the futuristic potential of jet fuel, and "SpongeBob SquarePants" for a lighthearted perspective on unexpected victories.

After all, in the quest for uncovering statistical anomalies, it's essential to embrace a spectrum of sources that transcends traditional academic literature. So let your statistical compass lead you to the most unexpected of destinations, where peculiar correlations and uncharted statistical territories await.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "fuel for thought" takes on a whole new meaning in this research study. We are delving into the intriguing and often overlooked intersection of jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL. This unlikely pairing has raised more than a few eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and football enthusiasts alike. The goal of this study is to uncover the mysterious connection between these seemingly disparate variables and to explore the statistical relationship between them. It's certainly a touchdown in the realm of unexpected statistical phenomena!
Now, before we dive headfirst into the data, let's take a moment for a relevant dad joke: How do statisticians summon good luck? They use a bayesian clover! Speaking of luck, we firmly believe that there's a scientific method behind the Titans' wins and the flow of jet fuel, one that extends beyond mere coincidence.
The correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' performance may seem as puzzling as a misplaced puzzle piece, but as we unravel the data, it becomes clear that there's more than meets the eye. This unexpected relationship may hold the key to unlocking intriguing insights and could potentially fuel further discussion and research in the realms of sports and global energy patterns. It's a statistical plot twist worthy of the biggest silver screen blockbuster!
But wait, let's not forget another dad joke: What did the Tennessee Titans say to the jet fuel in Venezuela? "You really know how to ignite our success!" It seems that even statistical oddities have a sense of humor. As we venture into this unexplored statistical terrain, we remain committed to unraveling the enchanting mystery behind this bizarre correlation.
In the next sections, we will dissect the data, explore potential theoretical frameworks, and discuss the implications of our findings. Stay tuned for an academic adventure that blends the rigors of scientific inquiry with the delightful absurdity of unexpected statistical connections. After all, in the world of research, truth is often stranger than fiction!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this quirky academic odyssey, we harnessed the power of statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic relationship between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal performance of the Tennessee Titans. Our data collection process involved summoning a team of intrepid research assistants, armed with an arsenal of internet searches, archival data from the Energy Information Administration, and football statistics from Pro-Football-Reference.com. This motley crew scoured through historical records dating from 1999 to 2021, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of cyberspace in pursuit of the elusive threads connecting these disparate variables.

Once our intrepid team had gathered the requisite data, we invoked the time-honored art of regression analysis, treating each variable as a multifaceted gem to be carefully scrutinized for hidden facets of statistical significance. Our goal was to quantify the relationship between jet fuel consumption and the Titans' wins, harnessing the power of the mighty correlation coefficient to thrust the essence of their connection into the limelight.

In conducting our analyses, we scrutinized the data with the focus and precision of a quarterback scanning the field for an open receiver. We spoke the language of mathematical models, coaxing meaningful insights from the cacophony of numeric variables at our disposal. Our tool kit included such stalwart statistical companions as Pearson's correlation coefficient and multiple regression analyses, each one drafted as a valiant soldier in the battle to decipher the cosmic dance between jet fuel and gridiron glory.

Now, we couldn't resist a spot of statistical humor: Why did the researcher bring a ladder to the data analysis party? Because he heard the success rates were through the roof! As we climbed the rungs of statistical analysis, we maintained a keen eye for potential confounding variables, recognizing that lurking in the shadows of our data were potential covariates and mediators waiting to spring a statistical surprise.

Our approach also involved conjuring hypothetical scenarios through thought experiments, dissecting potential mechanisms that could underpin the observed statistical relationship. We sifted through the labyrinth of theoretical frameworks, seeking an elegant model to encapsulate the interplay of factors contributing to this unusual statistical fusion.

Finally, in a show of camaraderie between the worlds of sports and the scientific method, we indulged in a bit of whimsy, celebrating the absurdity of our findings with a nod and a smile. As we proceed to unfold the tapestry of our methodology, we invite you to join us in this endeavor to embrace the unexpected and revel in the peculiar delights of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation -0.7846700, r-squared of 0.6157071, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the famous saying goes, "fuel for thought" takes on a whole new meaning in this research study. We are delving into the intriguing and often overlooked intersection of jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL. This unlikely pairing has raised more than a few eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and football enthusiasts alike. The goal of this study is to uncover the mysterious connection between these seemingly disparate variables and to explore the statistical relationship between them. It's certainly a touchdown in the realm of unexpected statistical phenomena!
Now, before we dive headfirst into the data, let's take a moment for a relevant dad joke: How do statisticians summon good luck? They use a bayesian clover! Speaking of luck, we firmly believe that there's a scientific method behind the Titans' wins and the flow of jet fuel, one that extends beyond mere coincidence.
The correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' performance may seem as puzzling as a misplaced puzzle piece, but as we unravel the data, it becomes clear that there's more than meets the eye. This unexpected relationship may hold the key to unlocking intriguing insights and could potentially fuel further discussion and research in the realms of sports and global energy patterns. It's a statistical plot twist worthy of the biggest silver screen blockbuster!
But wait, let's not forget another dad joke: What did the Tennessee Titans say to the jet fuel in Venezuela? "You really know how to ignite our success!" It seems that even statistical oddities have a sense of humor. As we venture into this unexplored statistical terrain, we remain committed to unraveling the enchanting mystery behind this bizarre correlation.
In the next sections, we will dissect the data, explore potential theoretical frameworks, and discuss the implications of our findings. Stay tuned for an academic adventure that blends the rigors of scientific inquiry with the delightful absurdity of unexpected statistical connections. After all, in the world of research, truth is often stranger than fiction!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis uncovered a rather striking negative correlation (r = -0.7846700) between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans from 1999 to 2021. This finding suggests that as jet fuel consumption in Venezuela increases, the number of wins for the Tennessee Titans decreases. It's as if the Titans' success is inversely proportional to the fuel consumption in a country rich in oil reserves.

In the spirit of statistical absurdities, it's like the Titans' victories are fueling the old adage, "no gas, all brakes" in Venezuela's energy consumption. This unexpected relationship between jet fuel and touchdowns has certainly thrown a curveball into the world of statistical analysis, leaving us all pondering the whimsical dance between energy sources and athletic triumphs. Who would have thought that such an unlikely duo could have a statistical bromance?

The calculated r-squared value of 0.6157071 indicates that approximately 61.57% of the variance in the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins can be explained by the variation in jet fuel consumption in Venezuela. It's as if the remaining 38.43% is hiding in the playbook of some yet-to-be-discovered statistical strategy.

As for the p-value being less than 0.01, well, one could say it "jets" ahead of the conventional threshold for statistical significance. This means the correlation observed is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, further fueling our intrigue in this curious connection. It's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to such unexpected and amusing correlations.

And now, presenting the star of the show, Fig. 1 - our scatterplot that visually illustrates the strong negative correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins. This figure is the touchdown of our results section, emphasizing the unlikely alliance and playful antics of these two variables.

In the grand scheme of statistical oddities, this peculiar relationship between jet fuel in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' victories is a reminder that in the world of research, truth really can be stranger than fiction. It's a statistical minefield of surprises and puzzles – just like trying to find all the points on a scatterplot!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The peculiar relationship between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal performance of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL has captivated researchers and football enthusiasts alike. As we embark on this journey of statistical whimsy, it is essential to review the existing literature and unearth potential antecedents that may shed light on this inexplicable correlation.
In "Fuel Matters: The Impact of Jet Fuel Supply on Global Energy Dynamics," Smith and Doe delve into the intricate web of global energy patterns, examining the influence of jet fuel consumption on various economic and industrial sectors. Lorem, the authors stress the pivotal role of jet fuel in shaping international energy landscapes, yet surprisingly, they omit any mention of its potential effect on NFL team victories.
It seems that this unexpected connection may have slipped under the radar of traditional energy analyses, akin to a football fumble in the midst of a crucial game. In "Winning Strategies: Unconventional Pathways to Victory," Jones and Smith explore the multifaceted nature of success in competitive environments. Ipsum, the authors illuminate unconventional routes to triumph, yet curiously, the potential impact of jet fuel on professional football remains uncharted territory within their discourse.
Now, let's take a moment for a dad joke that resonates with the topic at hand: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything – much like the mysterious influence of jet fuel on the Titans' wins, isn't it?
As we dig deeper into the literature, it becomes evident that the connection between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' seasonal victories unveils a narrative that transcends conventional statistical analyses. However, we must not dismiss the potential wisdom embedded in sources beyond traditional academic research.
In "Fueling the Team: A Case Study of Unlikely Catalysts for Sporting Success," the real-life account of underdog triumphs in professional sports offers compelling parallels to our research topic. Similarly, "Tales of Victorious Voyages: Mythic Journeys and the Arcane Forces that Propel Them," provides narrative insights that echo the whimsical nature of our statistical inquiry – and possibly the Titans' unexpected triumphs.
It is crucial to consider the sheer breadth of literature that encompasses offbeat connections and improbable victories. To that end, we may find unexpected inspiration from children's shows and cartoons, such as "The Jetsons," for insights into the futuristic potential of jet fuel, and "SpongeBob SquarePants" for a lighthearted perspective on unexpected victories.
After all, in the quest for uncovering statistical anomalies, it's essential to embrace a spectrum of sources that transcends traditional academic literature. So let your statistical compass lead you to the most unexpected of destinations, where peculiar correlations and uncharted statistical territories await.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis uncovered a rather striking negative correlation (r = -0.7846700) between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans from 1999 to 2021. This finding suggests that as jet fuel consumption in Venezuela increases, the number of wins for the Tennessee Titans decreases. It's as if the Titans' success is inversely proportional to the fuel consumption in a country rich in oil reserves.
In the spirit of statistical absurdities, it's like the Titans' victories are fueling the old adage, "no gas, all brakes" in Venezuela's energy consumption. This unexpected relationship between jet fuel and touchdowns has certainly thrown a curveball into the world of statistical analysis, leaving us all pondering the whimsical dance between energy sources and athletic triumphs. Who would have thought that such an unlikely duo could have a statistical bromance?
The calculated r-squared value of 0.6157071 indicates that approximately 61.57% of the variance in the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins can be explained by the variation in jet fuel consumption in Venezuela. It's as if the remaining 38.43% is hiding in the playbook of some yet-to-be-discovered statistical strategy.
As for the p-value being less than 0.01, well, one could say it "jets" ahead of the conventional threshold for statistical significance. This means the correlation observed is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, further fueling our intrigue in this curious connection. It's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to such unexpected and amusing correlations.
And now, presenting the star of the show, Fig. 1 - our scatterplot that visually illustrates the strong negative correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins. This figure is the touchdown of our results section, emphasizing the unlikely alliance and playful antics of these two variables.
In the grand scheme of statistical oddities, this peculiar relationship between jet fuel in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' victories is a reminder that in the world of research, truth really can be stranger than fiction. It's a statistical minefield of surprises and puzzles – just like trying to find all the points on a scatterplot!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study undeniably support the prior research literature, which suggested a relationship between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans. This unusual negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700 not only defies conventional statistical expectations but also confirms the unanticipated association proposed by our predecessors. It's as if the Titans' wins are running on fumes from a far-off runway in Venezuela.

Our results underscore the significance of seemingly unrelated variables and their potential impact on sporting outcomes, reminiscent of a quarterback throwing a curveball. Moreover, the calculated r-squared value of 0.6157071 indicates that a substantial portion of the variance in the Titans' wins can be attributed to fluctuations in jet fuel consumption, akin to a well-crafted game strategy unfolding before our statistical eyes. It's as if the variables are engaged in an unscripted play-by-play analysis of the game's performance.

Echoing the whimsical dalliance between jet fuel and touchdowns, the observed p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of this peculiar correlation. It's almost as if these variables are engaging in a statistical pas de deux, choreographing their influence on the gridiron stage.

Our results prompt the scholarly community to acknowledge the potential impact of unforeseen and quirky variables on statistical outcomes, akin to an unexpected guest appearance in a football huddle. As we embark on further research endeavors, it is imperative to embrace the unconventional and defy the boundaries of traditional statistical analyses to uncover hidden relationships, much like finding the perfect statistical match in an unexpected place.

The scatterplot presented in our results section serves as a visual touchdown, showcasing the unexpected dance of jet fuel consumption and the Tennessee Titans' victories. This figure serves as a testament to the notion that statistical anomalies can emerge from the most unsuspecting of sources, akin to a well-timed interception amidst an intense game.

In conclusion, our study not only adds a lighthearted spin to the world of statistical research but also underscores the potential influence of unexpected variables on sporting achievements. We have unraveled a quirky statistical bromance between jet fuel in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans, prompting future inquiries into the uncharted territories of statistical absurdities. After all, in the colorful landscape of statistical analysis, it's essential to embrace the unexpected – just like a surprise onside kick in the game of statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in Venezuela and Season wins for the Tennessee Titans. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.

Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the famous saying goes, "fuel for thought" takes on a whole new meaning in this research study. We are delving into the intriguing and often overlooked intersection of jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the NFL. This unlikely pairing has raised more than a few eyebrows and piqued the interest of researchers and football enthusiasts alike. The goal of this study is to uncover the mysterious connection between these seemingly disparate variables and to explore the statistical relationship between them. It's certainly a touchdown in the realm of unexpected statistical phenomena!
Now, before we dive headfirst into the data, let's take a moment for a relevant dad joke: How do statisticians summon good luck? They use a bayesian clover! Speaking of luck, we firmly believe that there's a scientific method behind the Titans' wins and the flow of jet fuel, one that extends beyond mere coincidence.
The correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' performance may seem as puzzling as a misplaced puzzle piece, but as we unravel the data, it becomes clear that there's more than meets the eye. This unexpected relationship may hold the key to unlocking intriguing insights and could potentially fuel further discussion and research in the realms of sports and global energy patterns. It's a statistical plot twist worthy of the biggest silver screen blockbuster!
But wait, let's not forget another dad joke: What did the Tennessee Titans say to the jet fuel in Venezuela? "You really know how to ignite our success!" It seems that even statistical oddities have a sense of humor. As we venture into this unexplored statistical terrain, we remain committed to unraveling the enchanting mystery behind this bizarre correlation.
In the next sections, we will dissect the data, explore potential theoretical frameworks, and discuss the implications of our findings. Stay tuned for an academic adventure that blends the rigors of scientific inquiry with the delightful absurdity of unexpected statistical connections. After all, in the world of research, truth is often stranger than fiction!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis uncovered a rather striking negative correlation (r = -0.7846700) between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans from 1999 to 2021. This finding suggests that as jet fuel consumption in Venezuela increases, the number of wins for the Tennessee Titans decreases. It's as if the Titans' success is inversely proportional to the fuel consumption in a country rich in oil reserves.
In the spirit of statistical absurdities, it's like the Titans' victories are fueling the old adage, "no gas, all brakes" in Venezuela's energy consumption. This unexpected relationship between jet fuel and touchdowns has certainly thrown a curveball into the world of statistical analysis, leaving us all pondering the whimsical dance between energy sources and athletic triumphs. Who would have thought that such an unlikely duo could have a statistical bromance?
The calculated r-squared value of 0.6157071 indicates that approximately 61.57% of the variance in the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins can be explained by the variation in jet fuel consumption in Venezuela. It's as if the remaining 38.43% is hiding in the playbook of some yet-to-be-discovered statistical strategy.
As for the p-value being less than 0.01, well, one could say it "jets" ahead of the conventional threshold for statistical significance. This means the correlation observed is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance, further fueling our intrigue in this curious connection. It's not every day that statistical analysis leads us to such unexpected and amusing correlations.
And now, presenting the star of the show, Fig. 1 - our scatterplot that visually illustrates the strong negative correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' seasonal wins. This figure is the touchdown of our results section, emphasizing the unlikely alliance and playful antics of these two variables.
In the grand scheme of statistical oddities, this peculiar relationship between jet fuel in Venezuela and the Tennessee Titans' victories is a reminder that in the world of research, truth really can be stranger than fiction. It's a statistical minefield of surprises and puzzles – just like trying to find all the points on a scatterplot!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a statistically significant negative correlation between jet fuel consumption in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans. This unsuspecting relationship has left us all scratching our heads and contemplating the quirky dances of statistics. It's as if the Titans' wins are swooping in to tackle the predictions of energy consumption with an unexpected blitz!

Our findings may seem as unexpected as a fumble in the red zone, but they have shed light on the whimsical world of statistical absurdities. This peculiar association between gridiron victories and jet fuel consumption speaks volumes about the uncanny nature of statistical connections. It's like watching a play unfold with more twists and turns than a spiral route!

As we wrap up this study, we leave you with a parting dad joke: Why did the statistician give up his job? He found it too taxing! Much like the Tennessee Titans' victories, this correlation has certainly defied the odds in the world of statistical inquiry.

In the spirit of academic integrity and statistical sanity, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings provide a touchdown of insight into this peculiar relationship, and any further investigation would feel like unnecessary roughness in the realm of statistical curiosity. It's a statistical game well played, and like a well-organized defense, we've intercepted the need for further analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Psychology and Performance Enhancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Sports Psychology and Performance Enhancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Fire: The Jet Fuel-Joy of Victory Connection in Tennessee's Titans with an abstract of This study examines the relationship between the consumption of jet fuel in Venezuela and the seasonal wins of the Tennessee Titans in the National Football League (NFL) from 1999 to 2021. By utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar connection. The statistical analysis revealed a surprising negative correlation coefficient of -0.7846700, with p < 0.01, suggesting a potentially influential factor.
Our findings spark some pun-believable discussions between the energy sector and the gridiron, unveiling unforeseen intersections. Indeed, our research has taken flight in uncovering the peculiar association between these ostensibly unrelated elements. As we delve into this unchartered territory, this study not only provides an amusing anecdote but also paves the way for further exploration into the whimsical world of statistical absurdities.

ChatGPT:

Venezuela jet fuel consumption, Tennessee Titans wins, NFL wins correlation, Energy Information Administration, Pro-Football-Reference.com, fuel consumption correlation with sports wins, unusual statistical correlations, jet fuel and football victories, Venezuelan jet fuel data, Tennessee Titans performance analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Jet fuel used in Venezuela
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Venezuela in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Venezuela

Season wins for the Tennessee Titans
Detailed data title: Number of season wins by the Tennessee Titans
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Season wins for the Tennessee Titans

Correlation r = -0.7846700 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6157071 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season wins for the Tennessee Titans) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Jet fuel used in Venezuela) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.31E-6. 0.0000093067328226558600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as -0.78 in 0.000931% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 107,449 random variables You don't actually need 107 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -0.9, -0.55 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Jet fuel used in Venezuela (Million Barrels/Day)5.365.518415.34464.9318112.631713.36154.605924.562473.011673.1937312313121314101096.213645.192524.04104
Season wins for the Tennessee Titans (Titans wins)1313711125481013869672399991112




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Inverted Y-axis: I inverted the Y-axis on the chart above so that the lines would move together. This is visually pleasing, but not at all intuitive. Below is a line graph that does not invert the Y-axis and starts at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.3,6,5.51841,5.3446,4.93181,12.6317,13.3615,4.60592,4.56247,3.01167,3.19373,12,3,13,12,13,14,10,10,9,6.21364,5.19252,4.04104,])
array_2 = np.array([13,13,7,11,12,5,4,8,10,13,8,6,9,6,7,2,3,9,9,9,9,11,12,])
array_1_name = "Jet fuel used in Venezuela"
array_2_name = "Season wins for the Tennessee Titans"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1330 · Black Variable ID: 25070 · Red Variable ID: 19677
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0