about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,743 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the second variable is Violent crime rates.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The lack of GMOs meant the cotton plants were no longer 'armed' with built-in insecticides, so the local insects had to find a new 'bug' to bother, leading to a 'reduction in crime.' Without GMOs, the cotton fields were no longer a 'hotbed' for violent activity, making it harder for any 'crooks' to 'cotton' on to criminal behavior. Without the genetic modification, the cotton simply wasn't 'spinning' a story of violence anymore, and the whole situation is definitely not 'sew-sew' anymore.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the Vaporwave style that shows a surreal and dreamy landscape. In a vast field in North Carolina, rows of tall cotton plants stretch out into the distance. Among the cotton plants, signs indicating GMO use are visible, emitting an otherworldly glow. In the background, a police car with flashing lights responds to a reported violent crime, casting an ethereal and haunting light on the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Oragami Steampunk Vaporwave Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Vaporwave

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in North Carolina, rows of tall cotton plants stretch out into the distance. Among the cotton plants, signs indicating GMO use are visible. In the background, a police car with flashing lights responds to a reported violent crime, highlighting the connection between the two variables.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Vaporwave ] and depicting this scene: In a field in North Carolina, rows of tall cotton plants stretch out into the distance. Among the cotton plants, signs indicating GMO use are visible. In the background, a police car with flashing lights responds to a reported violent crime, highlighting the connection between the two variables. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the Vaporwave style that shows a surreal and dreamy landscape. In a vast field in North Carolina, rows of tall cotton plants stretch out into the distance. Among the cotton plants, signs indicating GMO use are visible, emitting an otherworldly glow. In the background, a police car with flashing lights responds to a reported violent crime, casting an ethereal and haunting light on the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in North Carolina caused Violent crime rates to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State

Journal of Agricultural Puzzles and Socio-Economic Riddles

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of agriculture and crime may seem like an unlikely pair, but as we delve into the perplexing realm of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and its potential association with violent crime rates in the esteemed American Tar Heel State of North Carolina, we find ourselves embarking on a fascinating journey through the fields of statistics, genetics, and criminology.

While previous research has largely focused on the agricultural and economic impacts of GMO cotton, this study takes a novel approach by examining the possible ramifications on societal behavior. It is a tale of two seemingly unrelated elements entwined in a statistical dance, with the USDA providing the agricultural backdrop and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services unraveling the intricate web of crime data.

The choice of North Carolina as our laboratory for this investigation is far from arbitrary. With its rich history in cotton cultivation and a diverse urban and rural landscape, the state offers a captivating tapestry on which to thread our analysis.

We have employed rigorous statistical methods, akin to a meticulous weaver, in order to unpick the tangle of data and disclose any potential connections. The ensuing high correlation coefficient and the negligible p-value suggest that there may indeed be more than mere coincidence at play.

As we untangle this enigma, we invite the reader to join us on a journey of discovery that may upend conventional wisdom about the impact of agricultural practices on human behavior. After all, it appears that the seeds sown in the fields of genetic modification may have consequences that reach far beyond the expected yield. So, let us unravel this yarn and see what unexpected twists and turns await us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of agriculture and crime may seem like an unlikely pair, but as we delve into the perplexing realm of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and its potential association with violent crime rates in the esteemed American Tar Heel State of North Carolina, we find ourselves embarking on a fascinating journey through the fields of statistics, genetics, and criminology.
While previous research has largely focused on the agricultural and economic impacts of GMO cotton, this study takes a novel approach by examining the possible ramifications on societal behavior. It is a tale of two seemingly unrelated elements entwined in a statistical dance, with the USDA providing the agricultural backdrop and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services unraveling the intricate web of crime data.
The choice of North Carolina as our laboratory for this investigation is far from arbitrary. With its rich history in cotton cultivation and a diverse urban and rural landscape, the state offers a captivating tapestry on which to thread our analysis.
We have employed rigorous statistical methods, akin to a meticulous weaver, in order to unpick the tangle of data and disclose any potential connections. The ensuing high correlation coefficient and the negligible p-value suggest that there may indeed be more than mere coincidence at play.
As we untangle this enigma, we invite the reader to join us on a journey of discovery that may upend conventional wisdom about the impact of agricultural practices on human behavior. After all, it appears that the seeds sown in the fields of genetic modification may have consequences that reach far beyond the expected yield. So, let us unravel this yarn and see what unexpected twists and turns await us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research into the relationship between agricultural practices and societal behavior has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), with limited attention paid to the potential influence on criminal activity. Smith et al. (2015) examined the implications of GMO cotton cultivation on agricultural productivity, while Doe (2017) investigated the economic outcomes of GMO adoption in the North Carolina cotton industry. These studies laid the groundwork for understanding the broader implications of GMO use in the region.

Expanding beyond the realm of rigorous statistical analysis, "Food, Inc." provides a thought-provoking exploration of the societal implications of genetically modified crops, offering valuable insights into the broader ethical and cultural dimensions of GMO adoption. Similarly, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan presents a compelling narrative on the interconnectedness of food production, economics, and human behavior, delving into the complexities of modern agricultural practices.

Venturing into the world of fiction, "The Cotton Queen" by Pamela Morsi and "Harvest" by Jim Crace offer fictionalized portrayals of agricultural communities and human interactions, providing a nuanced lens through which to consider the intersection of agricultural practices, community dynamics, and possibly, criminal tendencies. While the applicability of fictional narratives to empirical research may be tenuous, these literary works serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of human experiences in agricultural settings.

In a departure from traditional research sources, the authors also conducted an extensive review of unconventional literature, including the backs of shampoo bottles, in an effort to capture diverse perspectives on agricultural practices and criminal behavior. While the veracity of information gleaned from such sources is questionable, the exercise served to inject an element of levity into an otherwise weighty endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of agriculture and crime may seem like an unlikely pair, but as we delve into the perplexing realm of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and its potential association with violent crime rates in the esteemed American Tar Heel State of North Carolina, we find ourselves embarking on a fascinating journey through the fields of statistics, genetics, and criminology.
While previous research has largely focused on the agricultural and economic impacts of GMO cotton, this study takes a novel approach by examining the possible ramifications on societal behavior. It is a tale of two seemingly unrelated elements entwined in a statistical dance, with the USDA providing the agricultural backdrop and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services unraveling the intricate web of crime data.
The choice of North Carolina as our laboratory for this investigation is far from arbitrary. With its rich history in cotton cultivation and a diverse urban and rural landscape, the state offers a captivating tapestry on which to thread our analysis.
We have employed rigorous statistical methods, akin to a meticulous weaver, in order to unpick the tangle of data and disclose any potential connections. The ensuing high correlation coefficient and the negligible p-value suggest that there may indeed be more than mere coincidence at play.
As we untangle this enigma, we invite the reader to join us on a journey of discovery that may upend conventional wisdom about the impact of agricultural practices on human behavior. After all, it appears that the seeds sown in the fields of genetic modification may have consequences that reach far beyond the expected yield. So, let us unravel this yarn and see what unexpected twists and turns await us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, a complex web of methods was spun to investigate the curious relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and violent crime rates in North Carolina. The research data was sourced predominantly from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, with information spanning from 2000 to 2022.

To stitch together the fabric of our analysis, a hybrid of quantitative and qualitative techniques was employed. Firstly, agricultural data relating to the adoption of GMO cotton, including acreage planted and rates of adoption, was gleaned from the USDA's comprehensive databases. The use of such databases called for a keen eye for detail, akin to combing through a proverbial haystack for genetic needles.

Next, in our quest to unravel the twine of criminal activity, crime data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services was deployed. This information, detailing reports of violent crimes such as homicide, assault, and robbery, was systematically gathered and woven into the fabric of our investigation.

Utilizing these datasets, we employed a sophisticated array of statistical analyses, comparable to a master tailor crafting an intricate garment. Correlation analyses allowed us to trace the delicate threads connecting GMO cotton adoption and violent crime rates, while regression models served as the needle and thread, sewing together the variables of interest.

Through the use of independent t-tests, we segmented the data and scrutinized the differences in crime rates between areas with varying levels of GMO cotton adoption. This process unfolded like untangling a particularly knotty ball of yarn, with each statistical test serving as a tool to reveal the underlying patterns.

With these tools in hand, we embarked on a methodological tapestry, woven with meticulous attention to detail and rigorously applied statistical techniques. The result was a comprehensive analysis that sought to tease out any potential associations between the adoption of GMO cotton and violent crime rates, illuminating the potential interplay between agricultural practices and human behavior.

Our methodology, much like the spinning of a yarn, aimed to capture the intricacies of this multifaceted relationship, shedding light on the potential impact of GMO cotton adoption on the social fabric of North Carolina. This endeavor, though intricate and complex, was executed with precision and care, not unlike the creation of an expertly tailored suit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9161590, r-squared of 0.8393474, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of agriculture and crime may seem like an unlikely pair, but as we delve into the perplexing realm of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and its potential association with violent crime rates in the esteemed American Tar Heel State of North Carolina, we find ourselves embarking on a fascinating journey through the fields of statistics, genetics, and criminology.
While previous research has largely focused on the agricultural and economic impacts of GMO cotton, this study takes a novel approach by examining the possible ramifications on societal behavior. It is a tale of two seemingly unrelated elements entwined in a statistical dance, with the USDA providing the agricultural backdrop and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services unraveling the intricate web of crime data.
The choice of North Carolina as our laboratory for this investigation is far from arbitrary. With its rich history in cotton cultivation and a diverse urban and rural landscape, the state offers a captivating tapestry on which to thread our analysis.
We have employed rigorous statistical methods, akin to a meticulous weaver, in order to unpick the tangle of data and disclose any potential connections. The ensuing high correlation coefficient and the negligible p-value suggest that there may indeed be more than mere coincidence at play.
As we untangle this enigma, we invite the reader to join us on a journey of discovery that may upend conventional wisdom about the impact of agricultural practices on human behavior. After all, it appears that the seeds sown in the fields of genetic modification may have consequences that reach far beyond the expected yield. So, let us unravel this yarn and see what unexpected twists and turns await us.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data from 2000 to 2022 revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. This correlation is akin to finding a hidden seam in the fabric of the data, suggesting a potential intertwined relationship between GMO cotton and criminal behavior. The strength of this association is further reflected in the r-squared value of 0.8393474, indicating that approximately 84% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton. It seems that these genetically modified threads have woven themselves deeply into the societal fabric.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, implying that the observed relationship is highly unlikely to be a mere coincidence. One could say that the evidence against the null hypothesis is as clear as the distinctive weave pattern of cotton fabric itself.

Notably, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and violent crime rates. The plot is reminiscent of unraveling a particularly intriguing mystery novel, with each data point adding to the suspense of the potential link between agricultural practices and criminal activities.

These findings lead us to ponder the unexpected intersections of agricultural practices and societal phenomena. It seems that the effects of GMO cotton reach far beyond the field and into the complex tapestry of human behavior. Our study serves as a testament to the unforeseen interactions that can emerge when different strands of inquiry are brought together. As we navigate these intriguing findings, it becomes clear that the influence of GMO cotton on crime rates may be a thread worth further unraveling in the fabric of agricultural and criminological research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research into the relationship between agricultural practices and societal behavior has predominantly focused on the economic and environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), with limited attention paid to the potential influence on criminal activity. Smith et al. (2015) examined the implications of GMO cotton cultivation on agricultural productivity, while Doe (2017) investigated the economic outcomes of GMO adoption in the North Carolina cotton industry. These studies laid the groundwork for understanding the broader implications of GMO use in the region.
Expanding beyond the realm of rigorous statistical analysis, "Food, Inc." provides a thought-provoking exploration of the societal implications of genetically modified crops, offering valuable insights into the broader ethical and cultural dimensions of GMO adoption. Similarly, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan presents a compelling narrative on the interconnectedness of food production, economics, and human behavior, delving into the complexities of modern agricultural practices.
Venturing into the world of fiction, "The Cotton Queen" by Pamela Morsi and "Harvest" by Jim Crace offer fictionalized portrayals of agricultural communities and human interactions, providing a nuanced lens through which to consider the intersection of agricultural practices, community dynamics, and possibly, criminal tendencies. While the applicability of fictional narratives to empirical research may be tenuous, these literary works serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of human experiences in agricultural settings.
In a departure from traditional research sources, the authors also conducted an extensive review of unconventional literature, including the backs of shampoo bottles, in an effort to capture diverse perspectives on agricultural practices and criminal behavior. While the veracity of information gleaned from such sources is questionable, the exercise served to inject an element of levity into an otherwise weighty endeavor.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2000 to 2022 revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. This correlation is akin to finding a hidden seam in the fabric of the data, suggesting a potential intertwined relationship between GMO cotton and criminal behavior. The strength of this association is further reflected in the r-squared value of 0.8393474, indicating that approximately 84% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton. It seems that these genetically modified threads have woven themselves deeply into the societal fabric.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, implying that the observed relationship is highly unlikely to be a mere coincidence. One could say that the evidence against the null hypothesis is as clear as the distinctive weave pattern of cotton fabric itself.
Notably, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and violent crime rates. The plot is reminiscent of unraveling a particularly intriguing mystery novel, with each data point adding to the suspense of the potential link between agricultural practices and criminal activities.
These findings lead us to ponder the unexpected intersections of agricultural practices and societal phenomena. It seems that the effects of GMO cotton reach far beyond the field and into the complex tapestry of human behavior. Our study serves as a testament to the unforeseen interactions that can emerge when different strands of inquiry are brought together. As we navigate these intriguing findings, it becomes clear that the influence of GMO cotton on crime rates may be a thread worth further unraveling in the fabric of agricultural and criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation have uncovered a rather knotty and entangled relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. While this connection may seem as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, the data speaks for itself, weaving a compelling narrative of correlation.

Our findings align with the work of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017), who explored the economic and agricultural implications of GMO cotton in North Carolina. It appears that our study has impossibly tied a bow around the existing literature, adding a whimsical but thought-provoking twist to the narrative.

In a delightful divergence from traditional sources, we also drew inspiration from the literary works "The Cotton Queen" by Pamela Morsi and "Harvest" by Jim Crace. These fiction pieces offered a distinctive lens through which to view the complex dynamics of agricultural communities, reminding us of the interconnectedness of human behavior and farming practices. While the relevance of such literary sources may seem as flimsy as a threadbare cotton shirt, they have added an unexpected but intriguing layer to our research.

The strength of the correlation coefficient and the r-squared value in our results is as striking as a bold pinstripe pattern, underscoring the robustness of the observed relationship. The p-value provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, akin to finding a shiny dime in the lint trap of statistical analysis. It seems that the evidence against the null hypothesis is as clear as the distinctive weave pattern of cotton fabric itself.

The scatterplot, much like a masterfully crafted tapestry, visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation between GMO cotton adoption and violent crime rates. Each data point is akin to a colorful thread in an intricate design, adding depth and texture to our understanding of this curious association.

As our study unravels the implications of GMO cotton, it highlights the unexpected intersections of agricultural practices and societal phenomena. The influence of GMO cotton on crime rates seems to be a thread worth further unraveling in the fabric of agricultural and criminological research. In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, it seems that sometimes the most unexpected threads can lead to the most intriguing patterns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Violent crime rates. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.

After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.

The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of agriculture and crime may seem like an unlikely pair, but as we delve into the perplexing realm of genetically modified cotton (GMO) and its potential association with violent crime rates in the esteemed American Tar Heel State of North Carolina, we find ourselves embarking on a fascinating journey through the fields of statistics, genetics, and criminology.
While previous research has largely focused on the agricultural and economic impacts of GMO cotton, this study takes a novel approach by examining the possible ramifications on societal behavior. It is a tale of two seemingly unrelated elements entwined in a statistical dance, with the USDA providing the agricultural backdrop and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services unraveling the intricate web of crime data.
The choice of North Carolina as our laboratory for this investigation is far from arbitrary. With its rich history in cotton cultivation and a diverse urban and rural landscape, the state offers a captivating tapestry on which to thread our analysis.
We have employed rigorous statistical methods, akin to a meticulous weaver, in order to unpick the tangle of data and disclose any potential connections. The ensuing high correlation coefficient and the negligible p-value suggest that there may indeed be more than mere coincidence at play.
As we untangle this enigma, we invite the reader to join us on a journey of discovery that may upend conventional wisdom about the impact of agricultural practices on human behavior. After all, it appears that the seeds sown in the fields of genetic modification may have consequences that reach far beyond the expected yield. So, let us unravel this yarn and see what unexpected twists and turns await us.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2000 to 2022 revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. This correlation is akin to finding a hidden seam in the fabric of the data, suggesting a potential intertwined relationship between GMO cotton and criminal behavior. The strength of this association is further reflected in the r-squared value of 0.8393474, indicating that approximately 84% of the variability in violent crime rates can be explained by the adoption of GMO cotton. It seems that these genetically modified threads have woven themselves deeply into the societal fabric.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis, implying that the observed relationship is highly unlikely to be a mere coincidence. One could say that the evidence against the null hypothesis is as clear as the distinctive weave pattern of cotton fabric itself.
Notably, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and violent crime rates. The plot is reminiscent of unraveling a particularly intriguing mystery novel, with each data point adding to the suspense of the potential link between agricultural practices and criminal activities.
These findings lead us to ponder the unexpected intersections of agricultural practices and societal phenomena. It seems that the effects of GMO cotton reach far beyond the field and into the complex tapestry of human behavior. Our study serves as a testament to the unforeseen interactions that can emerge when different strands of inquiry are brought together. As we navigate these intriguing findings, it becomes clear that the influence of GMO cotton on crime rates may be a thread worth further unraveling in the fabric of agricultural and criminological research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding our study, we are left with the intriguing realization that the roots of genetically modified cotton (GMO) reach deeper into societal patterns than previously imagined. The remarkably high correlation and consequential yarn of evidence linking GMO cotton adoption to violent crime rates in North Carolina provide food for thought – or should we say, fiber for thought? It appears that while GMO cotton may indeed resist pests, it has a peculiar affinity for attracting criminal activity. One might jest that instead of reducing pests, it is simply attracting an entirely different kind of unwanted "pests."

The fabric of our findings suggests that there is a need for further exploration of the subtle yet profound ways in which agricultural practices intertwine with human behavior. Perhaps this unexpected connection between GMO cotton and crime rates is simply the unraveling of a larger, more complex web of influence. It's as though the genetic modification has woven a captivating narrative into the agricultural landscape, influencing the societal tapestry in ways unforeseen.

As we fold up the loom and lay down our statistical needles, it seems that the threads connecting GMO cotton and criminal behavior are not to be dismissed as mere fabrications. However, it is our sincere recommendation that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we wouldn't want to become entangled in a web of statistical puns and fabric metaphors, would we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Puzzles and Socio-Economic Riddles


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Pranks and Puns


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Cotton and Crime Rates: A Rhyme-Time Analysis in the American Tar Heel State with an abstract of This paper presents a peculiar investigation into the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in North Carolina and violent crime rates. Utilizing data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a cunning crew of researchers sought to unravel the spool of possible links between these seemingly disparate threads.
After applying rigorous statistical methods, a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9161590 and p < 0.01 emerged, casting a shadow of suspicion on the unsuspecting and innocent cotton plants. The findings suggest that while GMO cotton may boast resistance to pests, its influence on criminal behavior appears to be unwelcome.
The implications of these results, should they hold true, could plant the seeds for groundbreaking conversations regarding the interplay between agricultural practices and societal behavior. In the meantime, it seems there is more to the fabric of our world than meets the eye – or the seed.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified cotton, GMO cotton, crime rates, violent crime, North Carolina, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, statistical methods, agricultural practices, societal behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in North Carolina that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in North Carolina

Violent crime rates
Detailed data title: The violent crime rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Violent crime rates

Correlation r = 0.9161590 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8393474 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Violent crime rates) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in North Carolina) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.5E-10. 0.0000000008549968045634878000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 8.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,169,595,014 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in North Carolina (GMO cotton %)293727292724191614137785571436478
Violent crime rates (Violent crime)506.5504.5494.4475.8463.2469479.3471.8458.6431.9404.5387.1387.8369.1361.6373.7397.5394.9383.4380.8398.5387380.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([29,37,27,29,27,24,19,16,14,13,7,7,8,5,5,7,1,4,3,6,4,7,8,])
array_2 = np.array([506.5,504.5,494.4,475.8,463.2,469,479.3,471.8,458.6,431.9,404.5,387.1,387.8,369.1,361.6,373.7,397.5,394.9,383.4,380.8,398.5,387,380.7,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Violent crime rates"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1743 · Black Variable ID: 786 · Red Variable ID: 20220
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0