about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,962 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'that is sus' and the second variable is Lululemon's stock price (LULU).  The chart goes from 2008 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Because as more people became suspicious of each other, they also started to suspect that Lululemon's yoga pants were secretly the key to world domination, leading to a surge in demand for their stock. It turns out the real 'LULU' in the stock market was this questionable but highly stretchable conspiracy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of pop art that portrays a person sitting at a desk with a vibrant pink and yellow color scheme. The person is using a laptop displaying the Google search page with "that is sus" typed into the search bar. A stock chart of Lululemon's stock price is shown on the screen, with a bold, dynamic line graph displaying a steady upward trajectory. The overall look and feel should capture the iconic pop art style with bold colors and strong graphical elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Pop art Low poly Steampunk Symbolism
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a person sitting at a desk with a laptop open, searching "that is sus" on Google. At the same time, a stock chart showing Lululemon's stock price is displayed on the screen, with the line graph showing a steady increase.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a person sitting at a desk with a laptop open, searching "that is sus" on Google. At the same time, a stock chart showing Lululemon's stock price is displayed on the screen, with the line graph showing a steady increase. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of pop art that portrays a person sitting at a desk with a vibrant pink and yellow color scheme. The person is using a laptop displaying the Google search page with "that is sus" typed into the search bar. A stock chart of Lululemon's stock price is shown on the screen, with a bold, dynamic line graph displaying a steady upward trajectory. The overall look and feel should capture the iconic pop art style with bold colors and strong graphical elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in that is sus (Google searches for 'that is sus') caused Lululemon's stock price (LULU) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

The Journal of Quirky Economic Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of internet colloquialisms and stock market dynamics is often overlooked in scholarly pursuits, but it is precisely this uncharted territory that has intrigued our research team. In the age of social media and memes, the phrase "that is sus" has permeated online conversations, infiltrating digital dialogues with sly allusions and clandestine connotations. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we delve into the inquisitive world of online suspicions, where Google searches for 'that is sus' become peculiar signals that seemingly hold sway over the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).

While one might be inclined to dismiss such an inquiry as whimsical or capricious, the significance of these findings cannot be understated. It is in this peculiar juxtaposition of online lexicon and financial markets that we find ourselves confronting a rather unexpected conundrum. As we navigate through this unfathomable terrain of digital whimsy and economic sensibilities, we invite the reader to partake in a curious journey where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the fluctuations of athleisure empires.

Now, the notion that Google searches for 'that is sus' could hold any discernible influence on Lululemon's stock price may, at first glance, appear to be nothing more than a flight of fancy. However, as the data unravel before our discerning eyes, a portrait emerges—a portrait of correlation, causation, and perhaps a touch of whimsy. In this paper, we shall elucidate the methodologies and empiricism that underpin our investigation into the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms—where online suspicions meet stock market surges, and where levity and lucrativeness collide in a most unexpected fashion.

Stay with us as we unravel the perplexing web of virtual musings and capitalist endeavors, for the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is confounding. Hold on to your athleisure, and prepare to stretch your intellectual muscles as we endeavor to decipher the cryptic signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of internet colloquialisms and stock market dynamics is often overlooked in scholarly pursuits, but it is precisely this uncharted territory that has intrigued our research team. In the age of social media and memes, the phrase "that is sus" has permeated online conversations, infiltrating digital dialogues with sly allusions and clandestine connotations. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we delve into the inquisitive world of online suspicions, where Google searches for 'that is sus' become peculiar signals that seemingly hold sway over the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
While one might be inclined to dismiss such an inquiry as whimsical or capricious, the significance of these findings cannot be understated. It is in this peculiar juxtaposition of online lexicon and financial markets that we find ourselves confronting a rather unexpected conundrum. As we navigate through this unfathomable terrain of digital whimsy and economic sensibilities, we invite the reader to partake in a curious journey where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the fluctuations of athleisure empires.
Now, the notion that Google searches for 'that is sus' could hold any discernible influence on Lululemon's stock price may, at first glance, appear to be nothing more than a flight of fancy. However, as the data unravel before our discerning eyes, a portrait emerges—a portrait of correlation, causation, and perhaps a touch of whimsy. In this paper, we shall elucidate the methodologies and empiricism that underpin our investigation into the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms—where online suspicions meet stock market surges, and where levity and lucrativeness collide in a most unexpected fashion.
Stay with us as we unravel the perplexing web of virtual musings and capitalist endeavors, for the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is confounding. Hold on to your athleisure, and prepare to stretch your intellectual muscles as we endeavor to decipher the cryptic signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price ventures into uncharted territory, drawing attention to the intersection of digital lexicon and financial fluctuations. Scholarly exploration in this whimsical domain sheds light on the intriguing relationship between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Do not be fooled by the frivolity of our pursuit, for the implications of our findings cannot be overstated.

In "Sleuthing on the Sus: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors explore the nuances of online colloquialisms and their potential impact on consumer behavior. Utilizing a combination of linguistic analysis and market data, the study reveals a hidden connection between digital musings and purchase decisions, laying the groundwork for our foray into the suspicious signals of Lululemon's stock performance.

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Unraveling the Mysteries of Online Vernacular," delve into the cryptic world of internet vernacular, unearthing the influence of seemingly innocuous phrases on commercial trends. Their in-depth examination of linguistic peculiarities provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation, as we seek to unravel the enigmatic link between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the fiscal fortunes of Lululemon.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Digital Whispers: The Untold Influence of Online Vocabulary" by Jane Businessperson offers a comprehensive study of the subtle yet profound impact of digital vernacular on consumer preferences and market behaviors. Drawing from extensive research in the field of digital anthropology, Businessperson uncovers the clandestine forces at play in online conversations, setting the stage for our exploration of suspect searches and stock surges.

On a more speculative note, works of fiction such as "The Conspiracy of Casualwear" by Arthur Adventure and "The Athleisure Enigma" by Victoria Vagabond provide a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the possibility of clandestine influences within the world of athleisure. While these literary works may not offer empirical evidence, they ignite the imagination and invite us to ponder the elusive connections between online suspicions and market dynamics.

In the realm of cinematic experiences, "Sneaky Business: The Suspicious Stockbroker" and "The Lululemon Paradox: Leggings, Lies, and Larceny" present tangentially related narratives that prompt contemplation on the interplay of suspicion and financial endeavors. While these films may veer into the realm of melodrama, they serve as entertaining anecdotes that underscore the mystique surrounding the intersection of online colloquialisms and stock market whims.

The literature surrounding the confluence of 'that is sus' searches and Lululemon's stock price carries a blend of scholarly gravitas and whimsical intrigue, underscoring the multifaceted nature of our research inquiry. As we journey through the whimsical realm of suspicious signals and stock market serendipity, we are poised to unravel the perplexing interplay between digital musings and financial vicissitudes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2008 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of internet colloquialisms and stock market dynamics is often overlooked in scholarly pursuits, but it is precisely this uncharted territory that has intrigued our research team. In the age of social media and memes, the phrase "that is sus" has permeated online conversations, infiltrating digital dialogues with sly allusions and clandestine connotations. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we delve into the inquisitive world of online suspicions, where Google searches for 'that is sus' become peculiar signals that seemingly hold sway over the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
While one might be inclined to dismiss such an inquiry as whimsical or capricious, the significance of these findings cannot be understated. It is in this peculiar juxtaposition of online lexicon and financial markets that we find ourselves confronting a rather unexpected conundrum. As we navigate through this unfathomable terrain of digital whimsy and economic sensibilities, we invite the reader to partake in a curious journey where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the fluctuations of athleisure empires.
Now, the notion that Google searches for 'that is sus' could hold any discernible influence on Lululemon's stock price may, at first glance, appear to be nothing more than a flight of fancy. However, as the data unravel before our discerning eyes, a portrait emerges—a portrait of correlation, causation, and perhaps a touch of whimsy. In this paper, we shall elucidate the methodologies and empiricism that underpin our investigation into the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms—where online suspicions meet stock market surges, and where levity and lucrativeness collide in a most unexpected fashion.
Stay with us as we unravel the perplexing web of virtual musings and capitalist endeavors, for the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is confounding. Hold on to your athleisure, and prepare to stretch your intellectual muscles as we endeavor to decipher the cryptic signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To navigate the labyrinth of online suspicions and their potential impact on the stock market, our research team employed a multifaceted approach with a touch of humor and a hint of whimsy. Our data collection methodology melded the art of sophisticated statistical analysis with the finesse of digital eavesdropping, leveraging the virtual breadcrumbs left by curious netizens. Braving the perilous depths of the World Wide Web, we gathered our data primarily from Google Trends, a stalwart guardian of search query insights, and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a treasure trove of financial market data.

The initial phase of our methodology involved scrutinizing trends in Google searches for the colloquial phrase "that is sus" from 2008 to 2023. Through this digital reconnaissance, we sought to unravel the ebb and flow of online suspicions, aiming to discern any intriguing patterns that might align with notable shifts in Lululemon's stock price. Prying into the world of digital musings, we meticulously scrutinized the frequency and intensity of these enigmatic searches, where suspicion lurks in the virtual shadows, often blending seamlessly with the fabric of online discourse.

Simultaneously, our team delved into the expansive vaults of financial data, extracting Lululemon's stock prices from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) with the zeal of treasure hunters unearthing elusive clues. We endeavored to unveil the subtle dance between online suspicions and stock market movements with the glee of intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories, all the while maintaining a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor.

With the data in hand, we conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis, utilizing robust regression models and time series techniques to tease out any underlying relationships between the frequency of "that is sus" searches and the fluctuations of Lululemon's stock price. Our statistical toolkit embraced the intricate art of correlation analysis, extracting nuggets of insight with the precision of a digital alchemist transmuting data into empirical gold.

Furthermore, to mitigate potential confounding variables and spurious relationships, we conducted rigorous sensitivity analyses and robustness checks, scrutinizing our findings with a skeptical eye and a wink of the statistical compass. Our methodology danced along the edge of empirical precision and fantastical inquiry, where the arcane mysteries of online lexicon met the unyielding crucible of statistical scrutiny.

In conclusion, our methodology was a delightful concoction of digital sleuthing, financial acumen, and whimsical curiosity, threading the needle between online musings and market musings in a quest to decipher the elusive signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock. This whimsical journey emboldened the spirit of inquiry, providing a glimpse into the idiosyncratic interplay of virtual whimsy and capitalist fervor. Join us as we unfurl the tapestry of empiricism and enchantment, where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the intrigues of financial markets, with a dash of levity strewn throughout.

(Note: The above methodology is fabricated for humorous and entertainment purposes only and does not constitute genuine academic research methods.)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9732116, r-squared of 0.9471408, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of internet colloquialisms and stock market dynamics is often overlooked in scholarly pursuits, but it is precisely this uncharted territory that has intrigued our research team. In the age of social media and memes, the phrase "that is sus" has permeated online conversations, infiltrating digital dialogues with sly allusions and clandestine connotations. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we delve into the inquisitive world of online suspicions, where Google searches for 'that is sus' become peculiar signals that seemingly hold sway over the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
While one might be inclined to dismiss such an inquiry as whimsical or capricious, the significance of these findings cannot be understated. It is in this peculiar juxtaposition of online lexicon and financial markets that we find ourselves confronting a rather unexpected conundrum. As we navigate through this unfathomable terrain of digital whimsy and economic sensibilities, we invite the reader to partake in a curious journey where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the fluctuations of athleisure empires.
Now, the notion that Google searches for 'that is sus' could hold any discernible influence on Lululemon's stock price may, at first glance, appear to be nothing more than a flight of fancy. However, as the data unravel before our discerning eyes, a portrait emerges—a portrait of correlation, causation, and perhaps a touch of whimsy. In this paper, we shall elucidate the methodologies and empiricism that underpin our investigation into the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms—where online suspicions meet stock market surges, and where levity and lucrativeness collide in a most unexpected fashion.
Stay with us as we unravel the perplexing web of virtual musings and capitalist endeavors, for the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is confounding. Hold on to your athleisure, and prepare to stretch your intellectual muscles as we endeavor to decipher the cryptic signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have unearthed a remarkably strong association that may leave one feeling, well, a bit suspicious. From 2008 to 2023, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9732116, an r-squared of 0.9471408, as well as a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings indicate a robust relationship between online suspicions and athleisure profits, leading us to ponder whether the digital musings of netizens could potentially sway stock prices in unexpected ways.

In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'that is sus' and fluctuations in LULU's stock price. The data points coalesce in a mesmerizing display of synchronicity, hinting at the intriguing interplay between online suspicions and market movements. It is almost as if the digital murmurs of suspicion are whispering secrets to the stock market, prompting Lululemon's shares to mirror the ebb and flow of online intrigue.

This unexpected convergence of seemingly unrelated phenomena invites further contemplation and research. While our results may raise a few eyebrows and elicit the occasional knowing chuckle, the implications of this correlation should not be hastily dismissed. Indeed, this study underscores the significance of exploring unconventional data sources in understanding the complexities of financial markets, where the whims of the digital realm intersect with the mechanisms of economic influence.

The uncanny alignment of searching 'sus' signals and Lululemon's stock performance gives rise to a myriad of possibilities, beckoning us to unravel the enigmatic ties between online vernacular and market behavior. With the cloak of suspicion draped over these fascinating findings, our scholarly journey takes a tantalizing turn as we venture into the uncharted terrain where digital expressions and financial endeavors converge in a most unexpected and amusing manner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price ventures into uncharted territory, drawing attention to the intersection of digital lexicon and financial fluctuations. Scholarly exploration in this whimsical domain sheds light on the intriguing relationship between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Do not be fooled by the frivolity of our pursuit, for the implications of our findings cannot be overstated.
In "Sleuthing on the Sus: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors explore the nuances of online colloquialisms and their potential impact on consumer behavior. Utilizing a combination of linguistic analysis and market data, the study reveals a hidden connection between digital musings and purchase decisions, laying the groundwork for our foray into the suspicious signals of Lululemon's stock performance.
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Unraveling the Mysteries of Online Vernacular," delve into the cryptic world of internet vernacular, unearthing the influence of seemingly innocuous phrases on commercial trends. Their in-depth examination of linguistic peculiarities provides a compelling backdrop for our investigation, as we seek to unravel the enigmatic link between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the fiscal fortunes of Lululemon.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Digital Whispers: The Untold Influence of Online Vocabulary" by Jane Businessperson offers a comprehensive study of the subtle yet profound impact of digital vernacular on consumer preferences and market behaviors. Drawing from extensive research in the field of digital anthropology, Businessperson uncovers the clandestine forces at play in online conversations, setting the stage for our exploration of suspect searches and stock surges.
On a more speculative note, works of fiction such as "The Conspiracy of Casualwear" by Arthur Adventure and "The Athleisure Enigma" by Victoria Vagabond provide a whimsical yet thought-provoking glimpse into the possibility of clandestine influences within the world of athleisure. While these literary works may not offer empirical evidence, they ignite the imagination and invite us to ponder the elusive connections between online suspicions and market dynamics.
In the realm of cinematic experiences, "Sneaky Business: The Suspicious Stockbroker" and "The Lululemon Paradox: Leggings, Lies, and Larceny" present tangentially related narratives that prompt contemplation on the interplay of suspicion and financial endeavors. While these films may veer into the realm of melodrama, they serve as entertaining anecdotes that underscore the mystique surrounding the intersection of online colloquialisms and stock market whims.
The literature surrounding the confluence of 'that is sus' searches and Lululemon's stock price carries a blend of scholarly gravitas and whimsical intrigue, underscoring the multifaceted nature of our research inquiry. As we journey through the whimsical realm of suspicious signals and stock market serendipity, we are poised to unravel the perplexing interplay between digital musings and financial vicissitudes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have unearthed a remarkably strong association that may leave one feeling, well, a bit suspicious. From 2008 to 2023, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9732116, an r-squared of 0.9471408, as well as a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings indicate a robust relationship between online suspicions and athleisure profits, leading us to ponder whether the digital musings of netizens could potentially sway stock prices in unexpected ways.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'that is sus' and fluctuations in LULU's stock price. The data points coalesce in a mesmerizing display of synchronicity, hinting at the intriguing interplay between online suspicions and market movements. It is almost as if the digital murmurs of suspicion are whispering secrets to the stock market, prompting Lululemon's shares to mirror the ebb and flow of online intrigue.
This unexpected convergence of seemingly unrelated phenomena invites further contemplation and research. While our results may raise a few eyebrows and elicit the occasional knowing chuckle, the implications of this correlation should not be hastily dismissed. Indeed, this study underscores the significance of exploring unconventional data sources in understanding the complexities of financial markets, where the whims of the digital realm intersect with the mechanisms of economic influence.
The uncanny alignment of searching 'sus' signals and Lululemon's stock performance gives rise to a myriad of possibilities, beckoning us to unravel the enigmatic ties between online vernacular and market behavior. With the cloak of suspicion draped over these fascinating findings, our scholarly journey takes a tantalizing turn as we venture into the uncharted terrain where digital expressions and financial endeavors converge in a most unexpected and amusing manner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The seemingly whimsical nature of our investigation into the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price has revealed an unexpectedly robust correlation, giving rise to a myriad of potential implications and perhaps a few raised eyebrows. Our findings not only substantiate the curious musings of prior scholars but also carry the weight of statistical significance, emphasizing the serendipitous dance between digital vernacular and financial vicissitudes.

Drawing from the scholarly insights of Smith et al., who deftly navigated through the nuances of online colloquialisms and market behavior, our study echoes their revelation of a clandestine connection lurking within the realm of linguistic musings. Lending further credence to the enigmatic influence of online vernacular, our findings align harmoniously with the invisible threads uncovered by Doe and Jones, amplifying the significance of seemingly innocuous phrases in shaping commercial trends. Despite the initial skepticism one might have harbored toward the compelling conclusions of Businessperson's comprehensive study on digital whispers, our research provides tangible evidence of the subtle yet profound impact of digital vernacular on market dynamics, affirming the potential sway of online suspicions on financial decision-making.

Figure 1, with its captivating display of synchronicity between 'that is sus' searches and Lululemon's stock price, not only serves as a visual testament to our findings but also evokes a sense of amusement as one contemplates the whimsical interplay between digital murmurs and market movements. This unexpected convergence prompts contemplation on the possibility of digital musings whispering secrets to the stock market, inviting us to ponder the clandestine influence of online suspicions on the ebb and flow of financial fortunes.

While our exploration into the suspicious signals and stock market serendipity may elicit the occasional knowing chuckle, it offers a compelling glimpse into the uncharted terrain where digital expressions and financial endeavors converge in a most unexpected and amusing manner. This study not only underscores the significance of delving into unconventional data sources in understanding the complexities of financial markets but also challenges us to embrace the whimsical intricacies that underpin the intersection of online vernacular and market behavior. As the cloak of suspicion shrouds our scholarly journey, this investigation embarks us on a tantalizing quest toward unraveling the enigmatic ties between digital musings and market dynamics, where suspicion and stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price (LULU). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of internet colloquialisms and stock market dynamics is often overlooked in scholarly pursuits, but it is precisely this uncharted territory that has intrigued our research team. In the age of social media and memes, the phrase "that is sus" has permeated online conversations, infiltrating digital dialogues with sly allusions and clandestine connotations. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we delve into the inquisitive world of online suspicions, where Google searches for 'that is sus' become peculiar signals that seemingly hold sway over the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
While one might be inclined to dismiss such an inquiry as whimsical or capricious, the significance of these findings cannot be understated. It is in this peculiar juxtaposition of online lexicon and financial markets that we find ourselves confronting a rather unexpected conundrum. As we navigate through this unfathomable terrain of digital whimsy and economic sensibilities, we invite the reader to partake in a curious journey where the suspicions of the online realm intertwine with the fluctuations of athleisure empires.
Now, the notion that Google searches for 'that is sus' could hold any discernible influence on Lululemon's stock price may, at first glance, appear to be nothing more than a flight of fancy. However, as the data unravel before our discerning eyes, a portrait emerges—a portrait of correlation, causation, and perhaps a touch of whimsy. In this paper, we shall elucidate the methodologies and empiricism that underpin our investigation into the enigmatic connection between these seemingly disparate realms—where online suspicions meet stock market surges, and where levity and lucrativeness collide in a most unexpected fashion.
Stay with us as we unravel the perplexing web of virtual musings and capitalist endeavors, for the journey promises to be as intriguing as it is confounding. Hold on to your athleisure, and prepare to stretch your intellectual muscles as we endeavor to decipher the cryptic signals of "That is sus" and Lululemon's stock.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have unearthed a remarkably strong association that may leave one feeling, well, a bit suspicious. From 2008 to 2023, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9732116, an r-squared of 0.9471408, as well as a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings indicate a robust relationship between online suspicions and athleisure profits, leading us to ponder whether the digital musings of netizens could potentially sway stock prices in unexpected ways.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'that is sus' and fluctuations in LULU's stock price. The data points coalesce in a mesmerizing display of synchronicity, hinting at the intriguing interplay between online suspicions and market movements. It is almost as if the digital murmurs of suspicion are whispering secrets to the stock market, prompting Lululemon's shares to mirror the ebb and flow of online intrigue.
This unexpected convergence of seemingly unrelated phenomena invites further contemplation and research. While our results may raise a few eyebrows and elicit the occasional knowing chuckle, the implications of this correlation should not be hastily dismissed. Indeed, this study underscores the significance of exploring unconventional data sources in understanding the complexities of financial markets, where the whims of the digital realm intersect with the mechanisms of economic influence.
The uncanny alignment of searching 'sus' signals and Lululemon's stock performance gives rise to a myriad of possibilities, beckoning us to unravel the enigmatic ties between online vernacular and market behavior. With the cloak of suspicion draped over these fascinating findings, our scholarly journey takes a tantalizing turn as we venture into the uncharted terrain where digital expressions and financial endeavors converge in a most unexpected and amusing manner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical escapade into the realm of online suspicions and stock market surges has left us both enlightened and bemused. The robust correlation between Google searches for 'that is sus' and Lululemon's stock price is no laughing matter, with a correlation coefficient so strong it could make even the most stoic economist crack a smile. The seemingly clandestine whispers of suspicion in the digital ethers appear to hold sway over the fluctuations of athleisure profits, prompting us to reconsider the unexpected influence of virtual musings on financial markets.

While our findings may appear to be an oddity in the world of academic research, they underscore the importance of exploring unconventional data sources in unraveling the complexities of economic dynamics. The tantalizing interplay between online vernacular and market behavior has left us pondering the myriad possibilities that arise from this unlikely correlation. Who would have thought that the sly mutterings of 'sus' could hold such sway over stock prices?

As we bid adieu to this peculiar journey, we emphasize that while the correlation may be robust, causation remains a mystery yet to be unraveled. The enigmatic ties between digital expressions and market surges beckon further inquiry, but for now, we can revel in the delightful whimsy of our findings. It seems that in the curious world of finance, even the most suspicious of online mutterings can have an impact.

So, in the spirit of academic inquiry and a touch of good humor, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. At least for now, let us savor the delightful absurdity of this unexpected correlation and turn our attention to the next enigmatic whimsy waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Economic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Persnickety Analysis of Consumer Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Searching 'Sus' Signals: Sneaky Suspicions and Lululemon's Stock with an abstract of This study investigates the curious connection between Google searches for 'that is sus' and the stock price of Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Utilizing data from Google Trends and LSEG Analytics, our research team embarked on a whimsical quest to uncover any underlying link between online suspicions and athleisure profits. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9732116 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 from 2008 to 2023. While some may dismiss this association as mere coincidence, our study sheds light on the potential impact of sly searches on seemingly unrelated financial fluctuations. Join us in navigating through the intriguing realm of digital musings and market movements, where the suspicious and the stock prices collide in a most unexpected fashion.

ChatGPT:

Lululemon stock price, Google searches, sus, correlation coefficient, Lululemon Athletica Inc, Google Trends, stock market, online suspicions, financial fluctuations, market movements, digital musings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'that is sus'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'that is sus' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'that is sus'

Lululemon's stock price (LULU)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Lululemon Athletica (LULU) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Lululemon's stock price (LULU)

Correlation r = 0.9732116 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9471408 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Lululemon's stock price (LULU)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'that is sus') over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-10. 0.0000000002473218690730540500
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 2.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,043,314,098 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Google searches for 'that is sus' (Rel. search volume)1.333336.416675.583336.9166710.2510.08338.666678.6666711.083312.515.416714.416740.833358.166781.666779.6
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) (Stock price)23.73.9815.4434.747.577.7359.0856.0153.7165.9477.31118.89232.9351.67392.2326.88




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.33333,6.41667,5.58333,6.91667,10.25,10.0833,8.66667,8.66667,11.0833,12.5,15.4167,14.4167,40.8333,58.1667,81.6667,79.6,])
array_2 = np.array([23.7,3.98,15.44,34.7,47.5,77.73,59.08,56.01,53.71,65.94,77.31,118.89,232.9,351.67,392.2,326.88,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'that is sus'"
array_2_name = "Lululemon's stock price (LULU)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 1962 · Black Variable ID: 1367 · Red Variable ID: 1735
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0