about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,971 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in Czechia and the second variable is Patents granted in the US.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The strong gusts of creativity blown in by Czechia's wind power have sparked a whirlwind of innovation across the Atlantic, leading to a patent storm in the US. It seems like when it comes to new ideas, Czechia is really raising the bar!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In Czechia, tall and graceful wind turbines stretch across a vast, green field against a clear blue sky, their blades spinning gracefully in the gentle breeze. Meanwhile, in the United States, a bustling patent office is depicted with inventors engaged in lively discussions with officials, surrounded by shelves lined with issued patents in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre A photo-realistic image Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Czechia, a field of tall graceful wind turbines stretches off into the distance, their blades spinning gracefully in the breeze. Meanwhile, in the United States, a bustling patent office is busy with inventors and officials collaborating and exchanging ideas, with shelves lined with issued patents as a backdrop.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Czechia, a field of tall graceful wind turbines stretches off into the distance, their blades spinning gracefully in the breeze. Meanwhile, in the United States, a bustling patent office is busy with inventors and officials collaborating and exchanging ideas, with shelves lined with issued patents as a backdrop. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In Czechia, tall and graceful wind turbines stretch across a vast, green field against a clear blue sky, their blades spinning gracefully in the gentle breeze. Meanwhile, in the United States, a bustling patent office is depicted with inventors engaged in lively discussions with officials, surrounded by shelves lined with issued patents in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Czechia caused Patents granted in the US to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

The Journal of Transcontinental Energy Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9500381 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The production of wind power has grown substantially in Czechia in recent years, paralleling the global trend towards renewable energy sources. As the wind blows through the picturesque landscapes of the Czech Republic, its potential impact reaches far beyond the generation of electricity. It has long been surmised, with some skepticism and mirth, that this renewable resource may hold an unexpected link to the innovation and technological advancement across the Atlantic in the United States.

However, such conjectures have been met with a healthy dose of incredulity, perhaps dismissed as mere whimsy in the windswept fields of academic inquiry. Nevertheless, the notion that the wind's whispers carry the seeds of innovation has persisted, warranting a rigorous investigation that pries into this tempestuous tango between wind power in Czechia and patent activity in the US.

Indeed, one cannot help but ponder whether the wind, that invisible force of nature, may be stealthily whispering groundbreaking ideas to inventive minds, riding on its zephyrous coattails. It's almost as if the wind itself is conducting a symphony of innovation across continents, a composition of creativity carried on the gentle breeze.

On that note, here's a relevant quip: Why do wind turbines make terrible comedians? Because their jokes are always too "windy"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The production of wind power has grown substantially in Czechia in recent years, paralleling the global trend towards renewable energy sources. As the wind blows through the picturesque landscapes of the Czech Republic, its potential impact reaches far beyond the generation of electricity. It has long been surmised, with some skepticism and mirth, that this renewable resource may hold an unexpected link to the innovation and technological advancement across the Atlantic in the United States.
However, such conjectures have been met with a healthy dose of incredulity, perhaps dismissed as mere whimsy in the windswept fields of academic inquiry. Nevertheless, the notion that the wind's whispers carry the seeds of innovation has persisted, warranting a rigorous investigation that pries into this tempestuous tango between wind power in Czechia and patent activity in the US.
Indeed, one cannot help but ponder whether the wind, that invisible force of nature, may be stealthily whispering groundbreaking ideas to inventive minds, riding on its zephyrous coattails. It's almost as if the wind itself is conducting a symphony of innovation across continents, a composition of creativity carried on the gentle breeze.
On that note, here's a relevant quip: Why do wind turbines make terrible comedians? Because their jokes are always too "windy"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the connection between wind power in Czechia and patents granted in the United States is as varied as the winds themselves. Smith et al. (2018) examined the potential impact of renewable energy sources on technological innovation, while Doe (2015) delved into the intricate web of global energy dynamics and their influence on international patent trends. Jones (2019) offered a comprehensive analysis of the renewable energy landscape, albeit without directly addressing its potential correlation with patent activities in the US.

In "Renewable Energy and Technological Innovation," the authors find that the adoption of sustainable energy sources may contribute to a surge in inventive activities, a notion that blows through the prevailing winds of skepticism in the field. Lorem ipsum, the gusts of creative energy unleashed by renewable resources may indeed hold surprising ramifications for patent development across borders.

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Wind in the Willows" and "Gone with the Wind" offer whimsical perspectives on the manifestation and impact of wind, albeit in quite different contexts. On a fictional note, "The Kite Runner" and "A Wind in the Door" present narratives that, while unrelated to the empirical study at hand, offer intriguing portrayals of the wind's influence on human experiences and relationships, evoking a metaphorical parallel to the potential influence of wind power on patents.

Moving onto TV shows, "Breaking Wind" and "The Windy Bunch" offer no relevant insights into the empirical relationship between wind power generation in Czechia and patents granted in the US, but were willingly watched by the authors for 'research purposes.'


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and USPTO . You used data from 2000 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The production of wind power has grown substantially in Czechia in recent years, paralleling the global trend towards renewable energy sources. As the wind blows through the picturesque landscapes of the Czech Republic, its potential impact reaches far beyond the generation of electricity. It has long been surmised, with some skepticism and mirth, that this renewable resource may hold an unexpected link to the innovation and technological advancement across the Atlantic in the United States.
However, such conjectures have been met with a healthy dose of incredulity, perhaps dismissed as mere whimsy in the windswept fields of academic inquiry. Nevertheless, the notion that the wind's whispers carry the seeds of innovation has persisted, warranting a rigorous investigation that pries into this tempestuous tango between wind power in Czechia and patent activity in the US.
Indeed, one cannot help but ponder whether the wind, that invisible force of nature, may be stealthily whispering groundbreaking ideas to inventive minds, riding on its zephyrous coattails. It's almost as if the wind itself is conducting a symphony of innovation across continents, a composition of creativity carried on the gentle breeze.
On that note, here's a relevant quip: Why do wind turbines make terrible comedians? Because their jokes are always too "windy"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the purported relationship between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States, a multifaceted and comprehensive approach was employed. Data on wind power generation in Czechia was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, while information on patents granted in the US was sourced from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

The selection of this data was based on its comprehensive coverage of the period from 2000 to 2020, ensuring a thorough examination of the temporal dynamics of wind power generation and patent activity. This extensive timeframe allowed for a nuanced understanding of the potential link between these two disparate variables, taking into account any long-term patterns or shifts that might have occurred.

In addition to quantitative analysis, the research team delved into qualitative research by conducting semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders in the wind power and innovation sectors. This approach was aimed at capturing the nuanced perspectives and insights of industry experts, patent attorneys, and innovators who might provide valuable anecdotal evidence regarding the potential influence of Czech wind power on inventive activities in the US.

Furthermore, in a bid to comprehensively explore the potential mechanisms underlying the observed relationship, a series of controlled experiments were carried out in a collaborative venture with meteorologists and innovation psychologists. These experiments involved simulating the effect of Czech wind patterns on the creative thinking and problem-solving abilities of US-based participants. The research team laughingly referred to it as the "Zephyrous Zeal" experiment, laying the groundwork for understanding the potential cognitive impact of wind-borne inspiration.

The statistical models used to analyze the data included a combination of time-series analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling. These analyses enabled the measurement of the strength and direction of the relationship between wind power generation in Czechia and patents granted in the US, accounting for the potential influence of confounding variables such as economic indicators, technological advancements, and policy changes.

The utilization of such diverse and interdisciplinary methodologies allowed for a thorough exploration of the complex interplay between wind power and patent activity, teasing out potential causative or correlative factors whilst infusing a breath of fresh air into the staid world of research methodologies.

As a fitting wind-themed jest in conclusion: What did the wind say to the famous inventor? "You blow me away with your ideas!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and USPTO .

For the time period 2000 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9500381, r-squared of 0.9025723, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The production of wind power has grown substantially in Czechia in recent years, paralleling the global trend towards renewable energy sources. As the wind blows through the picturesque landscapes of the Czech Republic, its potential impact reaches far beyond the generation of electricity. It has long been surmised, with some skepticism and mirth, that this renewable resource may hold an unexpected link to the innovation and technological advancement across the Atlantic in the United States.
However, such conjectures have been met with a healthy dose of incredulity, perhaps dismissed as mere whimsy in the windswept fields of academic inquiry. Nevertheless, the notion that the wind's whispers carry the seeds of innovation has persisted, warranting a rigorous investigation that pries into this tempestuous tango between wind power in Czechia and patent activity in the US.
Indeed, one cannot help but ponder whether the wind, that invisible force of nature, may be stealthily whispering groundbreaking ideas to inventive minds, riding on its zephyrous coattails. It's almost as if the wind itself is conducting a symphony of innovation across continents, a composition of creativity carried on the gentle breeze.
On that note, here's a relevant quip: Why do wind turbines make terrible comedians? Because their jokes are always too "windy"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In analyzing the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the years 2000 to 2020, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500381 was identified between the wind power generated in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States. This robust correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9025723, provided strong evidence of a positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolstered the significance of this finding.

The strong correlation suggests that the winds of change in Czechia may indeed carry a payload of innovative ideas, which seem to have wafted across the Atlantic, leaving their mark on inventive activities in the United States. It appears that the wind doesn't just blow, it also inspires! A gusty revelation indeed.

In the words of a wise old wind turbine, "It's not just hot air; there's some real power in the wind!"

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous positive correlation between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. The data points align themselves in a manner that unequivocally demonstrates the influence exerted by the wind power dynamics in Czechia on the patent activities across the ocean.

The findings of this study illuminate a previously uncharted aspect of the intricate web of global innovation dynamics, highlighting the unseen connections that traverse continents and manifest in unexpected manifestations. It seems that the wind's impact extends beyond the turbines and into the realm of human ingenuity, stirring the very fabric of technological progress.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the connection between wind power in Czechia and patents granted in the United States is as varied as the winds themselves. Smith et al. (2018) examined the potential impact of renewable energy sources on technological innovation, while Doe (2015) delved into the intricate web of global energy dynamics and their influence on international patent trends. Jones (2019) offered a comprehensive analysis of the renewable energy landscape, albeit without directly addressing its potential correlation with patent activities in the US.
In "Renewable Energy and Technological Innovation," the authors find that the adoption of sustainable energy sources may contribute to a surge in inventive activities, a notion that blows through the prevailing winds of skepticism in the field. Lorem ipsum, the gusts of creative energy unleashed by renewable resources may indeed hold surprising ramifications for patent development across borders.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Wind in the Willows" and "Gone with the Wind" offer whimsical perspectives on the manifestation and impact of wind, albeit in quite different contexts. On a fictional note, "The Kite Runner" and "A Wind in the Door" present narratives that, while unrelated to the empirical study at hand, offer intriguing portrayals of the wind's influence on human experiences and relationships, evoking a metaphorical parallel to the potential influence of wind power on patents.
Moving onto TV shows, "Breaking Wind" and "The Windy Bunch" offer no relevant insights into the empirical relationship between wind power generation in Czechia and patents granted in the US, but were willingly watched by the authors for 'research purposes.'

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the years 2000 to 2020, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500381 was identified between the wind power generated in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States. This robust correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9025723, provided strong evidence of a positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolstered the significance of this finding.
The strong correlation suggests that the winds of change in Czechia may indeed carry a payload of innovative ideas, which seem to have wafted across the Atlantic, leaving their mark on inventive activities in the United States. It appears that the wind doesn't just blow, it also inspires! A gusty revelation indeed.
In the words of a wise old wind turbine, "It's not just hot air; there's some real power in the wind!"
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous positive correlation between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. The data points align themselves in a manner that unequivocally demonstrates the influence exerted by the wind power dynamics in Czechia on the patent activities across the ocean.
The findings of this study illuminate a previously uncharted aspect of the intricate web of global innovation dynamics, highlighting the unseen connections that traverse continents and manifest in unexpected manifestations. It seems that the wind's impact extends beyond the turbines and into the realm of human ingenuity, stirring the very fabric of technological progress.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling findings of our study not only validate but also extend the existing literature on the intriguing relationship between wind power generation in Czechia and patents granted in the United States. Our results align with the previous studies by Smith et al. (2018) and Doe (2015), who posited the potential influence of renewable energy sources, including wind power, on inventive activities. Our research provides concrete empirical evidence to support the notion that the wind's whispers might indeed carry innovative ideas across borders, fuelling inventive spirits in distant lands.

It seems that the Czech wind has been more than just a breath of fresh air for the turbulent waters of patent activities in the US. Our study underscores the significance of looking beyond the conventional factors influencing inventive endeavors and considering the uncharted influence of renewable energy sources. The metaphorical winds of change, it turns out, may not be merely a passing breeze but a formidable force driving global technological innovation.

Moreover, our findings shed light on the potential for renewable energy dynamics to transcend geographical boundaries and shape inventive activities in seemingly disconnected regions. The wind, it appears, can be a carrier not just of kinetic energy but also of creative momentum, propelling the development of novel technologies in unforeseen ways.

As the saying goes, "The wind of change blows straight into the face of time." Similarly, our study blows away the skepticism surrounding the potential impact of wind power on inventive activities, revealing a robust and significant correlation that cannot be dismissed as mere gusts of coincidence.

In summary, our study reaffirms the far-reaching influence of wind power generation in Czechia, demonstrating that the winds of change may not just be a figment of poetic imagination but a tangible force shaping the global landscape of innovation. As we harness the power of renewable energy sources, let us not overlook their silent yet potent role in driving the winds of invention.

And as for a final dad joke: What's a wind turbine's favorite genre of music? They're big fans of "aero-music"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Czechia and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.

Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!

Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The production of wind power has grown substantially in Czechia in recent years, paralleling the global trend towards renewable energy sources. As the wind blows through the picturesque landscapes of the Czech Republic, its potential impact reaches far beyond the generation of electricity. It has long been surmised, with some skepticism and mirth, that this renewable resource may hold an unexpected link to the innovation and technological advancement across the Atlantic in the United States.
However, such conjectures have been met with a healthy dose of incredulity, perhaps dismissed as mere whimsy in the windswept fields of academic inquiry. Nevertheless, the notion that the wind's whispers carry the seeds of innovation has persisted, warranting a rigorous investigation that pries into this tempestuous tango between wind power in Czechia and patent activity in the US.
Indeed, one cannot help but ponder whether the wind, that invisible force of nature, may be stealthily whispering groundbreaking ideas to inventive minds, riding on its zephyrous coattails. It's almost as if the wind itself is conducting a symphony of innovation across continents, a composition of creativity carried on the gentle breeze.
On that note, here's a relevant quip: Why do wind turbines make terrible comedians? Because their jokes are always too "windy"!

[[RESULTS]]
In analyzing the data collected from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the years 2000 to 2020, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9500381 was identified between the wind power generated in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States. This robust correlation, with an r-squared value of 0.9025723, provided strong evidence of a positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolstered the significance of this finding.
The strong correlation suggests that the winds of change in Czechia may indeed carry a payload of innovative ideas, which seem to have wafted across the Atlantic, leaving their mark on inventive activities in the United States. It appears that the wind doesn't just blow, it also inspires! A gusty revelation indeed.
In the words of a wise old wind turbine, "It's not just hot air; there's some real power in the wind!"
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the conspicuous positive correlation between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. The data points align themselves in a manner that unequivocally demonstrates the influence exerted by the wind power dynamics in Czechia on the patent activities across the ocean.
The findings of this study illuminate a previously uncharted aspect of the intricate web of global innovation dynamics, highlighting the unseen connections that traverse continents and manifest in unexpected manifestations. It seems that the wind's impact extends beyond the turbines and into the realm of human ingenuity, stirring the very fabric of technological progress.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our empirical investigation has unraveled a wind-derful revelation: the wind power generated in Czechia shows a strong and significant positive relationship with the number of patents granted in the United States. This finding underscores the far-reaching influence of renewable energy sources on the realm of innovation, suggesting that the winds of change may carry more than just energy - they may also carry the seeds of inventive ideas.

Our study sheds light on a breeze-ing new perspective on the interconnectedness of global innovation dynamics, showing how the gentle whispers of the wind can traverse continents and leave their mark on inventive activities. It seems that the winds of Czechia are not only powering turbines but also inspiring minds across the Atlantic.

As we close the chapter on this investigation, we leave you with one last pun: Why don't we ever play hide and seek with the wind? Because it's always "blowing" the cover!

In light of these compelling findings, we assert that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a windsock on a still day. The evidence at hand stands as sturdy as a wind turbine in a storm, leaving no room for doubt. No more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Renewable Energy Studies and Global Innovation Alliance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Link Between Czech Wind Power and US Patent Flourish with an abstract of The connection between wind power generation in Czechia and the number of patents granted in the United States has long been a topic of speculation and jest. In this study, we set out to untangle this wind-knotty conundrum and shed light on the potential influence of the former on the latter, if any exists. Leveraging data extracted from the Energy Information Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, we embarked on a rigorous empirical investigation spanning the years 2000 to 2020.
Upon meticulous analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9500381, denoting a robust and significant positive relationship between the wind power generated in Czechia and the patents granted in the US. This finding suggests that the gusty endeavors in Czechia might indeed be blowing fresh ideas across the Atlantic, fuelling inventive spirits on the other side. It seems that the winds of change may carry more than just energy!
Now, for a dad joke relevant to the content: What do you call a wind turbine with a great sense of humor? A real "wind-up" merchant!

ChatGPT:

wind power, Czechia, United States, patents, correlation, Energy Information Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in Czechia
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Czechia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Czechia

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Correlation r = 0.9500381 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9025723 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Czechia) over the 21 years from 2000 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.7E-11. 0.0000000000467074365432897900
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 4.7E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 21,409,866,908 random variables You don't actually need 21 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Wind power generated in Czechia (Billion kWh)0.00100.0020.0050.010.0210.0490.1250.2450.2880.3349990.3950.4140.4759990.4690010.5630010.4879580.5819170.6006690.6909670.6907
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)175979183970184375187012181299157718196405182899185224191927244341247713276788302948326032325980333583351403339992391103388900




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0,0.002,0.005,0.01,0.021,0.049,0.125,0.245,0.288,0.334999,0.395,0.414,0.475999,0.469001,0.563001,0.487958,0.581917,0.600669,0.690967,0.6907,])
array_2 = np.array([175979,183970,184375,187012,181299,157718,196405,182899,185224,191927,244341,247713,276788,302948,326032,325980,333583,351403,339992,391103,388900,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Czechia"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1971 · Black Variable ID: 23624 · Red Variable ID: 848
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0