about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,097 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and the second variable is The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fewer people became experts in social sciences and history, there was a statewide crisis of confidence in the accuracy of property titles. This led to an unprecedented wave of self-examination, with many Nebraskan title examiners deciding to pursue their true passion: competitive cornhusking. Remember, in Nebraska, even the job market is corny!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant pop art interpretation of a cozy university courtyard in Nebraska. In the foreground, a group of scholars proudly stand in their billowing Master’s graduation gowns, with an array of colors and patterns on the gowns. They are surrounded by abstract representations of books, symbols of history, and social science elements. In the background, a bustling office building is depicted with busy title examiners, abstractors, and searchers working diligently, with pop art-style emphasis on their attention to detail and dedication. The entire scene is infused with bold and contrasting colors, evoking a sense of energy and achievement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal a Polaroid photo Pop art Concept art Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Pop art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy university courtyard in Nebraska, a group of scholars proudly receive their Master’s degrees in social sciences and history, their gowns billowing in the gentle breeze. Nearby, in a bustling office building, a team of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers diligently work to research and verify property titles, ensuring a smooth process for real estate transactions in the state.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Pop art ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy university courtyard in Nebraska, a group of scholars proudly receive their Master’s degrees in social sciences and history, their gowns billowing in the gentle breeze. Nearby, in a bustling office building, a team of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers diligently work to research and verify property titles, ensuring a smooth process for real estate transactions in the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant pop art interpretation of a cozy university courtyard in Nebraska. In the foreground, a group of scholars proudly stand in their billowing Master’s graduation gowns, with an array of colors and patterns on the gowns. They are surrounded by abstract representations of books, symbols of history, and social science elements. In the background, a bustling office building is depicted with busy title examiners, abstractors, and searchers working diligently, with pop art-style emphasis on their attention to detail and dedication. The entire scene is infused with bold and contrasting colors, evoking a sense of energy and achievement.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history caused The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Degrees and Vocational Professions

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academia often presents us with unexpected curiosities and peculiar coincidences, akin to stumbling upon a treasure map in a history textbook or finding a statistical theorem hidden in the annals of social sciences. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey through the heartland of the United States, where cornfields flourish, and the enigma of the Nebraska title examiners, abstractors, and searchers beckons us to uncover its secrets. Our quest sets the stage for a scholarly investigation into the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the abundance of these professional titans in the state of Nebraska.

As we don our proverbial academic pith helmets, let us first peer through the lens of the present-day job market. The world of title examination, abstraction, and searchery may appear to be an odyssey shrouded in mystique, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, but for those versed in property law and real estate transactions, these individuals are the unsung heroes navigating the labyrinthine terrain of land records and property titles. Meanwhile, the pursuit of a Master's degree in the hallowed halls of academia can lead one through a landscape of historical narratives and sociological inquiries, sometimes with a detour to ponder the metaphysical implications of the social contract. Yet, one may be forgiven for thinking that these two realms scarcely intersect, much like a parallel universe flirting with a multiverse theory.

Enter Nebraska, the land of the Cornhuskers and a melting pot of academic and professional intrigue. Our data-driven escapade into this Midwestern marvel has uncovered a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. The statistical coefficient of 0.9784925 stands as a beacon of wonder, guiding us through the maze of quantitative inquiry and prompting a bemused raise of the proverbial eyebrow. Our findings may prompt a reflective chuckle or two, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose, yet they also catalyze a fervent yearning for deeper understanding.

In the following pages, we wield the tools of quantitative analysis to untangle this web of correlation, striving for a robust understanding of the connection discerned in our data. As we tread further into this intellectual labyrinth, curiosity becomes our compass, and scholarly inquiry melds with an irrepressible sense of humor, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose. Let us, then, embark on this scholarly frolic and uncover the quixotic relationship between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the stalwart guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia often presents us with unexpected curiosities and peculiar coincidences, akin to stumbling upon a treasure map in a history textbook or finding a statistical theorem hidden in the annals of social sciences. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey through the heartland of the United States, where cornfields flourish, and the enigma of the Nebraska title examiners, abstractors, and searchers beckons us to uncover its secrets. Our quest sets the stage for a scholarly investigation into the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the abundance of these professional titans in the state of Nebraska.
As we don our proverbial academic pith helmets, let us first peer through the lens of the present-day job market. The world of title examination, abstraction, and searchery may appear to be an odyssey shrouded in mystique, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, but for those versed in property law and real estate transactions, these individuals are the unsung heroes navigating the labyrinthine terrain of land records and property titles. Meanwhile, the pursuit of a Master's degree in the hallowed halls of academia can lead one through a landscape of historical narratives and sociological inquiries, sometimes with a detour to ponder the metaphysical implications of the social contract. Yet, one may be forgiven for thinking that these two realms scarcely intersect, much like a parallel universe flirting with a multiverse theory.
Enter Nebraska, the land of the Cornhuskers and a melting pot of academic and professional intrigue. Our data-driven escapade into this Midwestern marvel has uncovered a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. The statistical coefficient of 0.9784925 stands as a beacon of wonder, guiding us through the maze of quantitative inquiry and prompting a bemused raise of the proverbial eyebrow. Our findings may prompt a reflective chuckle or two, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose, yet they also catalyze a fervent yearning for deeper understanding.
In the following pages, we wield the tools of quantitative analysis to untangle this web of correlation, striving for a robust understanding of the connection discerned in our data. As we tread further into this intellectual labyrinth, curiosity becomes our compass, and scholarly inquiry melds with an irrepressible sense of humor, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose. Let us, then, embark on this scholarly frolic and uncover the quixotic relationship between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the stalwart guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska has garnered substantial scholarly interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2018) delved into a review of the labor market in relation to academic qualifications, but the pun-o-meter remained disappointingly low throughout their exploration. Doe and Jones (2019) attempted to uncover this correlation, and though their findings proved insightful, the absence of wry anecdotes about title examination left a palpable void in the academic discourse.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction investigative literature, "The Property Law Chronicles" by Author A. Ideally suggests a narrative that tantalizes readers with clues about the interconnectedness of academic pursuits and professional responsibilities. Similarly, "Land Records and You: A Love Story" by Author B. Ractual teases the possibility of a mesmerizing tale of serendipitous encounters between Master's degrees and title examiners.

Delving further into the fictitious sphere, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Historian" by Elizabeth Kostova offer compelling narratives that, although entirely unrelated to our research, have undoubtedly been used as procrastination fodder by many a diligent academic. The themes of historical intrigue and enigmatic pursuits within these works may serve as a tenuous, albeit wildly speculative, parallel to the mysterious correlation we seek to unravel.

In the spirit of diligent research, the authors of this paper also delved into the world of television, with meticulous attention to shows such as "Property Brothers" and "Parks and Recreation." While the former might offer some insight into the day-to-day lives and, perhaps, humorously mundane trials of real estate professionals, the latter serves as a gentle reminder that a master's degree in social sciences can, in fact, lead to unforeseen career paths—such as those meandering through the whimsical halls of municipal government.

Stay tuned as we deconstruct the serious correlation between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the formidable guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia often presents us with unexpected curiosities and peculiar coincidences, akin to stumbling upon a treasure map in a history textbook or finding a statistical theorem hidden in the annals of social sciences. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey through the heartland of the United States, where cornfields flourish, and the enigma of the Nebraska title examiners, abstractors, and searchers beckons us to uncover its secrets. Our quest sets the stage for a scholarly investigation into the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the abundance of these professional titans in the state of Nebraska.
As we don our proverbial academic pith helmets, let us first peer through the lens of the present-day job market. The world of title examination, abstraction, and searchery may appear to be an odyssey shrouded in mystique, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, but for those versed in property law and real estate transactions, these individuals are the unsung heroes navigating the labyrinthine terrain of land records and property titles. Meanwhile, the pursuit of a Master's degree in the hallowed halls of academia can lead one through a landscape of historical narratives and sociological inquiries, sometimes with a detour to ponder the metaphysical implications of the social contract. Yet, one may be forgiven for thinking that these two realms scarcely intersect, much like a parallel universe flirting with a multiverse theory.
Enter Nebraska, the land of the Cornhuskers and a melting pot of academic and professional intrigue. Our data-driven escapade into this Midwestern marvel has uncovered a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. The statistical coefficient of 0.9784925 stands as a beacon of wonder, guiding us through the maze of quantitative inquiry and prompting a bemused raise of the proverbial eyebrow. Our findings may prompt a reflective chuckle or two, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose, yet they also catalyze a fervent yearning for deeper understanding.
In the following pages, we wield the tools of quantitative analysis to untangle this web of correlation, striving for a robust understanding of the connection discerned in our data. As we tread further into this intellectual labyrinth, curiosity becomes our compass, and scholarly inquiry melds with an irrepressible sense of humor, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose. Let us, then, embark on this scholarly frolic and uncover the quixotic relationship between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the stalwart guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious entanglement between the acquisition of Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History and the proliferation of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the humble abode of Nebraska, we employed a multi-faceted and delightfully convoluted approach that would have made the characters from the "Wizard of Oz" nod in approval. Our methodology can be likened to the intricate steps of a square dance, with each move designed to elucidate the kinship between these ostensibly dissimilar domains – academia and the bustling realm of professional title wrangling.

Before donning our methodological dancing shoes, we delved into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, gleaning data from 2012 to 2021 with the careful precision of a sommelier decanting a rare vintage. This digital harvest yielded a rich bounty of information, ripe for quantitative analysis and ripe for puns, although the latter was regrettably not included in our statistical models.

Our first grand jeté into the research arena led us to perform an intricate statistical tango, conducted with the unwavering grace of a professional ballroom dancer. Utilizing the time-honored Pearson correlation coefficient, we sought to quantitatively measure the degree of association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. The resulting coefficient of 0.9784925 stood as a testament to the synchronicity of our scholarly choreography, akin to a perfectly executed pas de deux on the stage of quantitative inquiry.

However, no academic waltz would be complete without a jig through the realms of significance testing. Here, we performed a series of robust t-tests and p-value calculations, spinning through the statistical landscape with the dexterity of a record-setting figure skater. The end result of our statistical ballet produced a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship that left our data shimmering like a sequined leotard in the spotlight of academic scrutiny.

Furthermore, in an effort to lend depth and dimension to our analysis, we waltzed with the majestic multivariate regression analysis, allowing us to control for potential confounding variables and perform an elegant pas de deux with the covariates lurking in the shadows of our data set. This allowed us to mitigate the potential influence of extraneous factors and showcase the pure, unadulterated connection between academic pursuits and professional vocations.

With our methodological ballet coming to a triumphant close, we stand ready to present the results of our scholarly expedition, exemplifying that quantitative inquiry can indeed be a dance of complexity, precision, and occasional whimsy. Join us as we now present the veritable symphony of correlation and causation that emerged from the whimsical waltz through our data, a narrative that is certain to provoke both analytical contemplation and perhaps, the occasional waltz-inspired chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9784925, r-squared of 0.9574477, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academia often presents us with unexpected curiosities and peculiar coincidences, akin to stumbling upon a treasure map in a history textbook or finding a statistical theorem hidden in the annals of social sciences. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey through the heartland of the United States, where cornfields flourish, and the enigma of the Nebraska title examiners, abstractors, and searchers beckons us to uncover its secrets. Our quest sets the stage for a scholarly investigation into the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the abundance of these professional titans in the state of Nebraska.
As we don our proverbial academic pith helmets, let us first peer through the lens of the present-day job market. The world of title examination, abstraction, and searchery may appear to be an odyssey shrouded in mystique, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, but for those versed in property law and real estate transactions, these individuals are the unsung heroes navigating the labyrinthine terrain of land records and property titles. Meanwhile, the pursuit of a Master's degree in the hallowed halls of academia can lead one through a landscape of historical narratives and sociological inquiries, sometimes with a detour to ponder the metaphysical implications of the social contract. Yet, one may be forgiven for thinking that these two realms scarcely intersect, much like a parallel universe flirting with a multiverse theory.
Enter Nebraska, the land of the Cornhuskers and a melting pot of academic and professional intrigue. Our data-driven escapade into this Midwestern marvel has uncovered a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. The statistical coefficient of 0.9784925 stands as a beacon of wonder, guiding us through the maze of quantitative inquiry and prompting a bemused raise of the proverbial eyebrow. Our findings may prompt a reflective chuckle or two, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose, yet they also catalyze a fervent yearning for deeper understanding.
In the following pages, we wield the tools of quantitative analysis to untangle this web of correlation, striving for a robust understanding of the connection discerned in our data. As we tread further into this intellectual labyrinth, curiosity becomes our compass, and scholarly inquiry melds with an irrepressible sense of humor, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose. Let us, then, embark on this scholarly frolic and uncover the quixotic relationship between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the stalwart guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska between 2012 and 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and the r-squared value of 0.9574477 point to an undeniably robust relationship between these two seemingly distant domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt in the curious alignment of these disparate fields.

Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot, illustrating this formidable correlation in all its glory. Like two star-crossed lovers waltzing under the statistical moonlight, the Master's degrees and the title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska whirl together in a dance of inexplicable harmony, echoing the serendipitous encounters of fate in the realm of academia and professional practice.

As we ponder this surprising association, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical mystique of scholarly pursuits and professional roles intertwining in a ballet of statistical significance. The charming encounter of these two distinct worlds not only piques our academic curiosity but also sparks a bewildered chuckle at the confounding nature of statistical phenomena. In the delightful spectacle of academia and professional practice engaging in an unexpected pas de deux, our findings open fascinating avenues for contemplation and further investigation.

The robust correlation uncovered in this study not only captivates our scholarly sensibilities but also beckons us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between academic pursuits and professional vocations. This peculiar relationship may spur a few raised eyebrows and bemused grins, akin to finding a punchline within a staid mathematical theorem, but it also invites us to embrace the serendipitous quirks that infuse statistical inquiry with a touch of whimsy. The unexpected alignment of Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History with the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska not only shapes our understanding of these fields but also imbues our scholarly endeavors with a delightful sense of wonder and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska has garnered substantial scholarly interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2018) delved into a review of the labor market in relation to academic qualifications, but the pun-o-meter remained disappointingly low throughout their exploration. Doe and Jones (2019) attempted to uncover this correlation, and though their findings proved insightful, the absence of wry anecdotes about title examination left a palpable void in the academic discourse.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction investigative literature, "The Property Law Chronicles" by Author A. Ideally suggests a narrative that tantalizes readers with clues about the interconnectedness of academic pursuits and professional responsibilities. Similarly, "Land Records and You: A Love Story" by Author B. Ractual teases the possibility of a mesmerizing tale of serendipitous encounters between Master's degrees and title examiners.
Delving further into the fictitious sphere, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Historian" by Elizabeth Kostova offer compelling narratives that, although entirely unrelated to our research, have undoubtedly been used as procrastination fodder by many a diligent academic. The themes of historical intrigue and enigmatic pursuits within these works may serve as a tenuous, albeit wildly speculative, parallel to the mysterious correlation we seek to unravel.
In the spirit of diligent research, the authors of this paper also delved into the world of television, with meticulous attention to shows such as "Property Brothers" and "Parks and Recreation." While the former might offer some insight into the day-to-day lives and, perhaps, humorously mundane trials of real estate professionals, the latter serves as a gentle reminder that a master's degree in social sciences can, in fact, lead to unforeseen career paths—such as those meandering through the whimsical halls of municipal government.
Stay tuned as we deconstruct the serious correlation between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the formidable guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains!

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska between 2012 and 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and the r-squared value of 0.9574477 point to an undeniably robust relationship between these two seemingly distant domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt in the curious alignment of these disparate fields.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot, illustrating this formidable correlation in all its glory. Like two star-crossed lovers waltzing under the statistical moonlight, the Master's degrees and the title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska whirl together in a dance of inexplicable harmony, echoing the serendipitous encounters of fate in the realm of academia and professional practice.
As we ponder this surprising association, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical mystique of scholarly pursuits and professional roles intertwining in a ballet of statistical significance. The charming encounter of these two distinct worlds not only piques our academic curiosity but also sparks a bewildered chuckle at the confounding nature of statistical phenomena. In the delightful spectacle of academia and professional practice engaging in an unexpected pas de deux, our findings open fascinating avenues for contemplation and further investigation.
The robust correlation uncovered in this study not only captivates our scholarly sensibilities but also beckons us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between academic pursuits and professional vocations. This peculiar relationship may spur a few raised eyebrows and bemused grins, akin to finding a punchline within a staid mathematical theorem, but it also invites us to embrace the serendipitous quirks that infuse statistical inquiry with a touch of whimsy. The unexpected alignment of Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History with the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska not only shapes our understanding of these fields but also imbues our scholarly endeavors with a delightful sense of wonder and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unveiled a remarkable symbiosis between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. This unexpected correlation stands as a testament to the unfathomable dance of fate that intertwines seemingly unrelated domains. As we take a contemplative step back to ponder this curious coupling, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical serendipity that underpins the statistical tapestry of our findings.

In the spirit of academic inquiry, it would be remiss not to note the peculiar absence of puns in previous studies exploring this correlation. Smith et al. (2018) ventured into the labor market with steadfast determination but overlooked the potential for a pun-laden foray into the world of title examination humor. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) approached the correlation with admirable rigor, yet failed to seize the opportunity for a few good-natured quips about the unexpected affinity between academic pursuits and professional vocations. While our tone remains earnest and scholarly, we cannot help but celebrate the unexpected validation of our unwavering belief that a well-placed pun can indeed hold untold academic merit.

With a correlation coefficient akin to a well-executed punchline and an r-squared value that sings like a perfectly timed comedic pause, our findings echo the delightful cadence of a statistical symphony. The p-value, like a punchline that lands with impeccable timing, further accentuates the undeniable significance of this correlation. Our results not only validate the prior research but also infuse our scholarly journey with a whimsical sense of awe at the unpredictable convergence of academic pursuit and professional practice.

As we savor the delightful astonishment that accompanies our research, we cannot help but grin at the inexplicable harmony between these seemingly orthogonal fields. The unexpected alignment of Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History with the cohort of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska not only enriches our understanding of these disciplines but also injects a touch of lighthearted amusement into the realm of statistical inquiry. The scholarly pursuits and professional roles entwined in this statistical waltz invite us to embrace the endearing quirks that enliven the tapestry of academic research, leaving us with a renewed appreciation for the delightful surprises that await within the seemingly mundane corridors of data analysis and scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska

[[ABSTRACT]]
The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academia often presents us with unexpected curiosities and peculiar coincidences, akin to stumbling upon a treasure map in a history textbook or finding a statistical theorem hidden in the annals of social sciences. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical journey through the heartland of the United States, where cornfields flourish, and the enigma of the Nebraska title examiners, abstractors, and searchers beckons us to uncover its secrets. Our quest sets the stage for a scholarly investigation into the connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the abundance of these professional titans in the state of Nebraska.
As we don our proverbial academic pith helmets, let us first peer through the lens of the present-day job market. The world of title examination, abstraction, and searchery may appear to be an odyssey shrouded in mystique, akin to a riddle wrapped in an enigma, but for those versed in property law and real estate transactions, these individuals are the unsung heroes navigating the labyrinthine terrain of land records and property titles. Meanwhile, the pursuit of a Master's degree in the hallowed halls of academia can lead one through a landscape of historical narratives and sociological inquiries, sometimes with a detour to ponder the metaphysical implications of the social contract. Yet, one may be forgiven for thinking that these two realms scarcely intersect, much like a parallel universe flirting with a multiverse theory.
Enter Nebraska, the land of the Cornhuskers and a melting pot of academic and professional intrigue. Our data-driven escapade into this Midwestern marvel has uncovered a striking correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. The statistical coefficient of 0.9784925 stands as a beacon of wonder, guiding us through the maze of quantitative inquiry and prompting a bemused raise of the proverbial eyebrow. Our findings may prompt a reflective chuckle or two, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose, yet they also catalyze a fervent yearning for deeper understanding.
In the following pages, we wield the tools of quantitative analysis to untangle this web of correlation, striving for a robust understanding of the connection discerned in our data. As we tread further into this intellectual labyrinth, curiosity becomes our compass, and scholarly inquiry melds with an irrepressible sense of humor, reminiscent of a jest hidden within a weighty tome of academic prose. Let us, then, embark on this scholarly frolic and uncover the quixotic relationship between Master's degrees in the social sciences and history and the stalwart guardians of property records in the heart of the Great Plains.

[[RESULTS]]
Our data analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska between 2012 and 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and the r-squared value of 0.9574477 point to an undeniably robust relationship between these two seemingly distant domains. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolsters the statistical significance of this finding, leaving little room for doubt in the curious alignment of these disparate fields.
Figure 1 depicts the scatterplot, illustrating this formidable correlation in all its glory. Like two star-crossed lovers waltzing under the statistical moonlight, the Master's degrees and the title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska whirl together in a dance of inexplicable harmony, echoing the serendipitous encounters of fate in the realm of academia and professional practice.
As we ponder this surprising association, we cannot help but marvel at the whimsical mystique of scholarly pursuits and professional roles intertwining in a ballet of statistical significance. The charming encounter of these two distinct worlds not only piques our academic curiosity but also sparks a bewildered chuckle at the confounding nature of statistical phenomena. In the delightful spectacle of academia and professional practice engaging in an unexpected pas de deux, our findings open fascinating avenues for contemplation and further investigation.
The robust correlation uncovered in this study not only captivates our scholarly sensibilities but also beckons us to delve deeper into the enigmatic interplay between academic pursuits and professional vocations. This peculiar relationship may spur a few raised eyebrows and bemused grins, akin to finding a punchline within a staid mathematical theorem, but it also invites us to embrace the serendipitous quirks that infuse statistical inquiry with a touch of whimsy. The unexpected alignment of Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History with the population of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska not only shapes our understanding of these fields but also imbues our scholarly endeavors with a delightful sense of wonder and amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the curtains on our whimsical exploration of the correlation between Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska, we find ourselves on a merry-go-round of statistical surprise. Our findings have shed light on the captivating dance of academia and professional practice, akin to discovering a pun hidden in a sea of solemn prose.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a p-value of less than 0.01 have left us not just scratching our heads in bewilderment but also smiling at the capricious nature of statistical whimsy. It's as if statistical significance decided to don a jesters' hat, leading us on a merry chase through the convoluted corridors of quantitative inquiry.

Like a comedic duo exchanging witty banter, the Master's degrees in Social Sciences and History and the title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska have engaged in a tango of statistical significance, leaving us simultaneously scratching our heads and applauding their unexpected performance.

In conclusion, our research has not only uncovered a peculiar correlation but has also injected a dose of scholarly amusement into the otherwise serious realm of quantitative analysis. However, as we bask in the whimsy of this correlation, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have undoubtedly unearthed the lighthearted essence of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Degrees and Vocational Professions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Studies in Nebraskan Title Examiners


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mastering the Connection: A Quantitative Analysis of Social Sciences and History Master's Degrees and Title Examiners, Abstractors, and Searchers in Nebraska with an abstract of The paper examines the intriguing relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the count of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in the great state of Nebraska. Through a careful analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9784925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. This finding sheds light on the curious interplay between academic pursuits and professional roles, offering valuable insights while also causing a few eyebrows to raise in surprise. The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate fields may lead to a quizzical chuckle or two, but it also opens intriguing avenues for further research and contemplation.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees, Social Sciences, History, Title examiners, Abstractors, Searchers, Nebraska, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, academic pursuits, professional roles, relationship, quantitative analysis, link between degrees and professions

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Social sciences and history
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history

The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska

Correlation r = 0.9784925 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9574477 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.1E-7. 0.0000009121809180122853000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 9.1E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,096,274 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history (Degrees awarded)21891215912149720533198612000419884203031950719845
The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska (Laborers)610610510340260270300320240250




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21891,21591,21497,20533,19861,20004,19884,20303,19507,19845,])
array_2 = np.array([610,610,510,340,260,270,300,320,240,250,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history"
array_2_name = "The number of title examiners, abstractors, and searchers in Nebraska"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2097 · Black Variable ID: 1339 · Red Variable ID: 10890
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0