about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,305 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the second variable is The number of blender tenders in Mississippi.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi decreased, more people were able to hold onto their cars, reducing the need for blender tenders to blend in as they made their smooth getaway. It seems like the criminal smoothie operation has hit a roadblock!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover with a captivating scene: A vibrant parking lot outside a Mississippi home where a car with an open trunk is surrounded by a group of people. Two individuals are preparing fruit smoothies using blenders plugged into the car's cigarette lighter, while others look on with curiosity. The scene is filled with a feeling of resourcefulness and community in an unexpected setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Symbolism Steampunk Concept art Voxel art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a parking lot outside a home in Mississippi, a car with an open trunk sits with its key in the ignition, surrounded by a group of people. Among them, a couple of individuals are seen preparing fruit smoothies using blenders plugged into the car's cigarette lighter.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a parking lot outside a home in Mississippi, a car with an open trunk sits with its key in the ignition, surrounded by a group of people. Among them, a couple of individuals are seen preparing fruit smoothies using blenders plugged into the car's cigarette lighter. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover with a captivating scene: A vibrant parking lot outside a Mississippi home where a car with an open trunk is surrounded by a group of people. Two individuals are preparing fruit smoothies using blenders plugged into the car's cigarette lighter, while others look on with curiosity. The scene is filled with a feeling of resourcefulness and community in an unexpected setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi caused The number of blender tenders in Mississippi to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

The Journal of Absurd Inquiries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi have long been a concern for law enforcement agencies and citizens alike. The economic impact, the emotional toll on victims, and the logistical nightmare of dealing with insurance claims and police reports all contribute to the gravity of this issue. On the other hand, amidst the hustle and bustle of Mississippian life, there exists another group quietly blending into the background – the blender tenders. These unsung heroes of the kitchen wield their power to pulverize, puree, and liquefy with remarkable dexterity. It's an odd juxtaposition – car thieves slipping away into the night, and blender enthusiasts crafting the perfect smoothie in the comfort of their own homes.

Our investigation delves into the unexpected question of whether there's a meaningful link between these seemingly disparate worlds. While on the surface, it appears about as relevant as comparing apples to carburetors, there may be more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like the fusion of two elements in a science experiment – only this time, instead of producing a new compound, we might just uncover a surprising statistical relationship between these unusual variables.

Before we peel back the layers of this enigma and reveal our findings, it's important to acknowledge the speculative nature of this inquiry. Indeed, some may be inclined to dismiss our pursuit as a wild goose chase through the fields of correlation without causation. Nonetheless, we assure the reader that our approach has been as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown – meticulously designed, carefully executed, and occasionally punctuated by unexpected explosions of data.

As we embark on this peculiar journey of analysis, we invite our scholarly companions to leave their preconceptions at the door and embrace the whimsical adventure that awaits. After all, in the grand theater of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating performances occur in the most unexpected acts. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and blend in as we explore the peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi have long been a concern for law enforcement agencies and citizens alike. The economic impact, the emotional toll on victims, and the logistical nightmare of dealing with insurance claims and police reports all contribute to the gravity of this issue. On the other hand, amidst the hustle and bustle of Mississippian life, there exists another group quietly blending into the background – the blender tenders. These unsung heroes of the kitchen wield their power to pulverize, puree, and liquefy with remarkable dexterity. It's an odd juxtaposition – car thieves slipping away into the night, and blender enthusiasts crafting the perfect smoothie in the comfort of their own homes.
Our investigation delves into the unexpected question of whether there's a meaningful link between these seemingly disparate worlds. While on the surface, it appears about as relevant as comparing apples to carburetors, there may be more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like the fusion of two elements in a science experiment – only this time, instead of producing a new compound, we might just uncover a surprising statistical relationship between these unusual variables.
Before we peel back the layers of this enigma and reveal our findings, it's important to acknowledge the speculative nature of this inquiry. Indeed, some may be inclined to dismiss our pursuit as a wild goose chase through the fields of correlation without causation. Nonetheless, we assure the reader that our approach has been as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown – meticulously designed, carefully executed, and occasionally punctuated by unexpected explosions of data.
As we embark on this peculiar journey of analysis, we invite our scholarly companions to leave their preconceptions at the door and embrace the whimsical adventure that awaits. After all, in the grand theater of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating performances occur in the most unexpected acts. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and blend in as we explore the peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The association between motor vehicle thefts and seemingly unrelated social and economic indicators has been a topic of interest for researchers and enthusiasts alike. Smith (2010) examined the relationship between automotive larceny and local dairy production in Vermont, while Doe (2015) explored the correlation between car thefts and the prevalence of ceramic garden gnomes in suburban areas. Jones (2018) delved into the perplexing connection between auto theft rates and the number of Elvis impersonators in Nevada. These studies, though seemingly whimsical at first glance, underscore the overarching theme that statistical relationships may lurk in the unlikeliest of places.

As we delve into the uncharted territory of blending motor vehicle thefts with the number of blender tenders in Mississippi, we are reminded of the words of renowned sociologist, Lorem Ipsum, who famously remarked that "the thread of correlation may snag on the most mundane of needles, or unravel amidst the most exotic of tapestries." Indeed, our pursuit may appear far-fetched, akin to chasing unicorns in a field of data, but as Lorem Ipsum wisely posits, the most fantastical endeavors often lead to the most intriguing discoveries.

Turning to related literature, "The Economics of Thievery: A Comparative Analysis of Larcenous Relationships" by Larceny and Robbin (2017) provides a comprehensive examination of the economic drivers of various theft activities. Although the focus is broad, the insights garnered from this work shed light on the intricate web of incentives that may underpin criminal behavior, lending credence to the notion that the passion for pilfering and the operation of household appliances may not be as mutually exclusive as one might think.

In a similar vein, "Blender Bonanza: An Ode to the Unsung Heroes of the Kitchen" by Blendmaster and Whirr (2021) presents an in-depth exploration of the historical, cultural, and culinary significance of blenders and their stewards. While this work may not directly address criminal activities, it offers a glimpse into the world of those who deftly manipulate the blades of blending, inviting us to ponder the potential intersections of this arcane craft with the darker facets of societal fabric.

Transitioning from the realm of serious non-fiction, we encounter literary works that bear curious relevance to our quest. "The Art of Automobile Acquisition" by Isaac Wheelspawn (2008) and "The Blending Bounty: Recipes and Reflections from the Blender Frontier" by Martha Mixer (2014) stand as literary mile markers in our meandering journey through the landscape of our inquiry. Though these tomes may not explicitly discuss the interplay between auto thefts and blender occupations, their mere existence within the literary canon serves as a gentle nudge, whispering that there may be bizarre, untrodden paths waiting to be unearthed.

Now, in a departure from the conventional, we turn our attention to fictional narratives that, in their imaginative tapestries, may offer unsuspected insights into the enigmatic relationship we seek to unravel. The chilling tale of "The Stolen Sedans and Smoothie Sabotage: A Mississippi Mystery" by Agatha AutoTheft (1999) and the heartwarming saga of "Blender Bandits and the Mississippi Menace" by Mildred Mystical (2012) present fictionalized scenarios that, while purely products of imagination, prick our curiosity with their whimsical juxtapositions of crime and culinary pursuits.

Adding a slight yet pertinent departure from the realm of printed media, we cannot overlook the immersive world of television. Shows such as "Criminal Blues: A Smooth Criminal's Struggle" and "Blender Battalion: Tales of Pulp and Puree" offer unique perspectives that may, in some measure, reflect elements of the intertwining themes we seek to disentangle. The immersive allure of visual storytelling, with its myriad nuances and quirks, may cast a light on the intricate dance between illicit vehicular activities and the humble art of blender mastery.

As we navigate this colorful array of literature and media, we are reminded of the sheer expanse of intellectual terrain that awaits exploration. In the tapestry of knowledge, each thread – be it whimsical, speculative, or purely fictional – contributes its own hue to the grand mosaic of understanding. Our journey of scholarly excitement and playful investigation continues as we seek to shed light on the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi have long been a concern for law enforcement agencies and citizens alike. The economic impact, the emotional toll on victims, and the logistical nightmare of dealing with insurance claims and police reports all contribute to the gravity of this issue. On the other hand, amidst the hustle and bustle of Mississippian life, there exists another group quietly blending into the background – the blender tenders. These unsung heroes of the kitchen wield their power to pulverize, puree, and liquefy with remarkable dexterity. It's an odd juxtaposition – car thieves slipping away into the night, and blender enthusiasts crafting the perfect smoothie in the comfort of their own homes.
Our investigation delves into the unexpected question of whether there's a meaningful link between these seemingly disparate worlds. While on the surface, it appears about as relevant as comparing apples to carburetors, there may be more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like the fusion of two elements in a science experiment – only this time, instead of producing a new compound, we might just uncover a surprising statistical relationship between these unusual variables.
Before we peel back the layers of this enigma and reveal our findings, it's important to acknowledge the speculative nature of this inquiry. Indeed, some may be inclined to dismiss our pursuit as a wild goose chase through the fields of correlation without causation. Nonetheless, we assure the reader that our approach has been as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown – meticulously designed, carefully executed, and occasionally punctuated by unexpected explosions of data.
As we embark on this peculiar journey of analysis, we invite our scholarly companions to leave their preconceptions at the door and embrace the whimsical adventure that awaits. After all, in the grand theater of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating performances occur in the most unexpected acts. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and blend in as we explore the peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the web of intrigue surrounding the perplexing correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi, we employed a methodology as diverse and dynamic as the array of smoothie recipes in a bustling kitchen. Our research team cast a wide net across the internet, snaring data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics like a cunning angler aiming to reel in an abundance of statistical fish.

To begin this whimsical odyssey, we combed through records covering the period from 2003 to 2022, capturing an extensive timeframe akin to the aging process of a fine wine – or perhaps more aptly, the expiration of a forgotten jar of blender salsa. With this temporal scope, we sought to capture the full spectrum of motor vehicle theft escapades and blender-tending escapades, hoping to expose any underlying patterns reminiscent of a carefully layered parfait.

Our first step involved the extraction of robust statistical data on motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi, covering both reported and unreported instances with the precision of a blender slicing through a jumble of fruits and vegetables. We meticulously recorded counts of stolen vehicles, scrutinizing their make, model, and year with the fervor of a car enthusiast perusing a vintage auto show.

Simultaneously, we delved into the enigmatic realm of blender tenders – a group as enigmatic as the Loch Ness Monster and perhaps just as elusive. Scouring the depths of labor statistics, we cataloged the number of individuals employed in occupations related to blender operation and maintenance, sifting through the data with the dedication of an archaeologist sifting through layers of ancient artifacts. This allowed us to construct a comprehensive portrait of the blender-tending community, revealing their numerical strength and unearthing any potential correlations hidden within the annals of labor data.

Following this exhaustive data collection phase, we embarked on a statistical voyage worthy of a crew of daring explorers. Armed with a trusty statistical toolkit, we calculated the correlation coefficient between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders, utilizing techniques as precise as a master chef measuring ingredients for a prized recipe. Our analysis sought to discern whether a meaningful relationship existed between these seemingly incongruent variables, akin to discerning the hidden flavors within a deceptively simple smoothie blend.

Furthermore, we subjected our findings to rigorous hypothesis testing, employing p-values and confidence intervals like seasoned detectives corroborating evidence in a perplexing case. Our goal was to ascertain the statistical significance of any observed correlations and distinguish between mere happenstance and genuine association, akin to separating a bushel of ripe bananas from a crate of utilitarian lug nuts.

Lastly, we meticulously combed through our results, ensuring that our conclusions were as robust as a well-built automobile chassis and as insightful as a well-crafted blender. In doing so, we sought to present a coherent narrative that encapsulated the peculiar dance of data points, illuminating the underlying relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders with the clarity of a pristine car windshield.

With this multifaceted and spirited methodology, we endeavored to unravel the mysteries shrouding the unexpected entanglement of car larceny and blender aficionados, embracing the quirks and curiosities of statistical exploration with an unyielding spirit of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9068316, r-squared of 0.8223435, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi have long been a concern for law enforcement agencies and citizens alike. The economic impact, the emotional toll on victims, and the logistical nightmare of dealing with insurance claims and police reports all contribute to the gravity of this issue. On the other hand, amidst the hustle and bustle of Mississippian life, there exists another group quietly blending into the background – the blender tenders. These unsung heroes of the kitchen wield their power to pulverize, puree, and liquefy with remarkable dexterity. It's an odd juxtaposition – car thieves slipping away into the night, and blender enthusiasts crafting the perfect smoothie in the comfort of their own homes.
Our investigation delves into the unexpected question of whether there's a meaningful link between these seemingly disparate worlds. While on the surface, it appears about as relevant as comparing apples to carburetors, there may be more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like the fusion of two elements in a science experiment – only this time, instead of producing a new compound, we might just uncover a surprising statistical relationship between these unusual variables.
Before we peel back the layers of this enigma and reveal our findings, it's important to acknowledge the speculative nature of this inquiry. Indeed, some may be inclined to dismiss our pursuit as a wild goose chase through the fields of correlation without causation. Nonetheless, we assure the reader that our approach has been as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown – meticulously designed, carefully executed, and occasionally punctuated by unexpected explosions of data.
As we embark on this peculiar journey of analysis, we invite our scholarly companions to leave their preconceptions at the door and embrace the whimsical adventure that awaits. After all, in the grand theater of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating performances occur in the most unexpected acts. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and blend in as we explore the peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the perplexing correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi yielded some unexpected yet tantalizing results. After analyzing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period spanning 2003 to 2022, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316, an r-squared value of 0.8223435, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical parameters point to a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, prompting both sober reflection and lighthearted speculation.

The r-squared value indicates that approximately 82.23% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variation in the number of blender tenders. That's a hefty chunk of the theft puzzle potentially linked to the blend of blenders in the state. It's as if the thieves are revving up their engines proportionate to the smoothie-making activity – a perplexing yet strangely compelling observation.

Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we discovered. The data points form a pattern that can only be described as a "smooth" relationship, much like the consistency of a well-prepared smoothie. The linear trend is unmistakable, and it's as clear as day that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It's almost as if the thieves and the blender aficionados are engaging in an intricate dance, with one group taking and the other giving, albeit in entirely different contexts.

These findings have left us pondering the nature of this unusual relationship. Is there a criminal underground network of smoothie enthusiasts, feverishly purloining vehicles to power their blenders? Or perhaps there's a more innocent explanation, such as an unforeseen economic correlation or even a statistical fluke. The halfway point between skepticism and curiosity is where we find ourselves, tantalized by the mystery and eager to unwarp the tightly wound blend of variables intertwining in the great state of Mississippi.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The association between motor vehicle thefts and seemingly unrelated social and economic indicators has been a topic of interest for researchers and enthusiasts alike. Smith (2010) examined the relationship between automotive larceny and local dairy production in Vermont, while Doe (2015) explored the correlation between car thefts and the prevalence of ceramic garden gnomes in suburban areas. Jones (2018) delved into the perplexing connection between auto theft rates and the number of Elvis impersonators in Nevada. These studies, though seemingly whimsical at first glance, underscore the overarching theme that statistical relationships may lurk in the unlikeliest of places.
As we delve into the uncharted territory of blending motor vehicle thefts with the number of blender tenders in Mississippi, we are reminded of the words of renowned sociologist, Lorem Ipsum, who famously remarked that "the thread of correlation may snag on the most mundane of needles, or unravel amidst the most exotic of tapestries." Indeed, our pursuit may appear far-fetched, akin to chasing unicorns in a field of data, but as Lorem Ipsum wisely posits, the most fantastical endeavors often lead to the most intriguing discoveries.
Turning to related literature, "The Economics of Thievery: A Comparative Analysis of Larcenous Relationships" by Larceny and Robbin (2017) provides a comprehensive examination of the economic drivers of various theft activities. Although the focus is broad, the insights garnered from this work shed light on the intricate web of incentives that may underpin criminal behavior, lending credence to the notion that the passion for pilfering and the operation of household appliances may not be as mutually exclusive as one might think.
In a similar vein, "Blender Bonanza: An Ode to the Unsung Heroes of the Kitchen" by Blendmaster and Whirr (2021) presents an in-depth exploration of the historical, cultural, and culinary significance of blenders and their stewards. While this work may not directly address criminal activities, it offers a glimpse into the world of those who deftly manipulate the blades of blending, inviting us to ponder the potential intersections of this arcane craft with the darker facets of societal fabric.
Transitioning from the realm of serious non-fiction, we encounter literary works that bear curious relevance to our quest. "The Art of Automobile Acquisition" by Isaac Wheelspawn (2008) and "The Blending Bounty: Recipes and Reflections from the Blender Frontier" by Martha Mixer (2014) stand as literary mile markers in our meandering journey through the landscape of our inquiry. Though these tomes may not explicitly discuss the interplay between auto thefts and blender occupations, their mere existence within the literary canon serves as a gentle nudge, whispering that there may be bizarre, untrodden paths waiting to be unearthed.
Now, in a departure from the conventional, we turn our attention to fictional narratives that, in their imaginative tapestries, may offer unsuspected insights into the enigmatic relationship we seek to unravel. The chilling tale of "The Stolen Sedans and Smoothie Sabotage: A Mississippi Mystery" by Agatha AutoTheft (1999) and the heartwarming saga of "Blender Bandits and the Mississippi Menace" by Mildred Mystical (2012) present fictionalized scenarios that, while purely products of imagination, prick our curiosity with their whimsical juxtapositions of crime and culinary pursuits.
Adding a slight yet pertinent departure from the realm of printed media, we cannot overlook the immersive world of television. Shows such as "Criminal Blues: A Smooth Criminal's Struggle" and "Blender Battalion: Tales of Pulp and Puree" offer unique perspectives that may, in some measure, reflect elements of the intertwining themes we seek to disentangle. The immersive allure of visual storytelling, with its myriad nuances and quirks, may cast a light on the intricate dance between illicit vehicular activities and the humble art of blender mastery.
As we navigate this colorful array of literature and media, we are reminded of the sheer expanse of intellectual terrain that awaits exploration. In the tapestry of knowledge, each thread – be it whimsical, speculative, or purely fictional – contributes its own hue to the grand mosaic of understanding. Our journey of scholarly excitement and playful investigation continues as we seek to shed light on the unexpected relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the perplexing correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi yielded some unexpected yet tantalizing results. After analyzing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period spanning 2003 to 2022, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316, an r-squared value of 0.8223435, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical parameters point to a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, prompting both sober reflection and lighthearted speculation.
The r-squared value indicates that approximately 82.23% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variation in the number of blender tenders. That's a hefty chunk of the theft puzzle potentially linked to the blend of blenders in the state. It's as if the thieves are revving up their engines proportionate to the smoothie-making activity – a perplexing yet strangely compelling observation.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we discovered. The data points form a pattern that can only be described as a "smooth" relationship, much like the consistency of a well-prepared smoothie. The linear trend is unmistakable, and it's as clear as day that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It's almost as if the thieves and the blender aficionados are engaging in an intricate dance, with one group taking and the other giving, albeit in entirely different contexts.
These findings have left us pondering the nature of this unusual relationship. Is there a criminal underground network of smoothie enthusiasts, feverishly purloining vehicles to power their blenders? Or perhaps there's a more innocent explanation, such as an unforeseen economic correlation or even a statistical fluke. The halfway point between skepticism and curiosity is where we find ourselves, tantalized by the mystery and eager to unwarp the tightly wound blend of variables intertwining in the great state of Mississippi.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation have unveiled a remarkable correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Our findings echo the sentiments expressed by Smith (2010), Doe (2015), and Jones (2018) regarding the propensity for statistical relationships to emerge from seemingly unconnected realms. It seems that the odd and whimsical pursuits of research into dairy production, ceramic garden gnomes, and even Elvis impersonators have paved the way for our own exploration into the enigmatic connection between auto theft and the world of blender mastery.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and the p-value of less than 0.01 support and expand upon the previous findings, underscoring the unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and culinary craftsmanship. Our results align with the broader theme that the web of correlation may indeed ensnare the most mundane of needles or unravel amidst the most exotic of tapestries (Lorem Ipsum, specific reference unavailable).

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8223435 signifies that approximately 82.23% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi can be elucidated by the variation in the number of blender tenders. This statistically significant relationship suggests a strong and intriguing connection, begging the question: could there be a smoothie crime syndicate clandestinely operating amid Mississippi's bustling blender bonanza?

The scatterplot visually depicts the striking correlation, presenting a pattern that evokes the smooth consistency of a well-prepared smoothie, raising the possibility of a harmonious albeit bizarre dance between the thieves and the blender aficionados. Indeed, the intricate interplay of these variables calls to mind the words of Isaac Newton: "Every action has an equal and opposite reaction," although in this case, the actions involve theft and blending, and the reactions yield an unexpected statistical harmony.

As we navigate the labyrinth of statistical and sociological implications, the sheer quirkiness of our findings beckons us to entertain a plethora of possibilities. Could it be that blender tenders inadvertently influence the proclivity for automotive larceny, either through their sheer presence or perhaps through the seductive allure of artisanal smoothies in the criminal underworld? Or is this correlation merely a cheerful statistical serendipity, destined to befuddle criminologists and culinary enthusiasts alike?

In unraveling the perplexing correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi, we find ourselves amidst an enthralling blend of thrilling discovery and lighthearted speculation. What remains certain is that the connection between these seemingly unrelated variables has piqued our interest and ignited a spark of scholarly excitement, leaving us eagerly anticipating the next chapter in this unexpected escapade through the statistical tangling of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and The number of blender tenders in Mississippi. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi have long been a concern for law enforcement agencies and citizens alike. The economic impact, the emotional toll on victims, and the logistical nightmare of dealing with insurance claims and police reports all contribute to the gravity of this issue. On the other hand, amidst the hustle and bustle of Mississippian life, there exists another group quietly blending into the background – the blender tenders. These unsung heroes of the kitchen wield their power to pulverize, puree, and liquefy with remarkable dexterity. It's an odd juxtaposition – car thieves slipping away into the night, and blender enthusiasts crafting the perfect smoothie in the comfort of their own homes.
Our investigation delves into the unexpected question of whether there's a meaningful link between these seemingly disparate worlds. While on the surface, it appears about as relevant as comparing apples to carburetors, there may be more to this connection than meets the eye. It's like the fusion of two elements in a science experiment – only this time, instead of producing a new compound, we might just uncover a surprising statistical relationship between these unusual variables.
Before we peel back the layers of this enigma and reveal our findings, it's important to acknowledge the speculative nature of this inquiry. Indeed, some may be inclined to dismiss our pursuit as a wild goose chase through the fields of correlation without causation. Nonetheless, we assure the reader that our approach has been as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown – meticulously designed, carefully executed, and occasionally punctuated by unexpected explosions of data.
As we embark on this peculiar journey of analysis, we invite our scholarly companions to leave their preconceptions at the door and embrace the whimsical adventure that awaits. After all, in the grand theater of statistical exploration, sometimes the most captivating performances occur in the most unexpected acts. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and blend in as we explore the peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in the great state of Mississippi.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the perplexing correlation between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi yielded some unexpected yet tantalizing results. After analyzing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period spanning 2003 to 2022, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316, an r-squared value of 0.8223435, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical parameters point to a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, prompting both sober reflection and lighthearted speculation.
The r-squared value indicates that approximately 82.23% of the variability in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by the variation in the number of blender tenders. That's a hefty chunk of the theft puzzle potentially linked to the blend of blenders in the state. It's as if the thieves are revving up their engines proportionate to the smoothie-making activity – a perplexing yet strangely compelling observation.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the robust correlation we discovered. The data points form a pattern that can only be described as a "smooth" relationship, much like the consistency of a well-prepared smoothie. The linear trend is unmistakable, and it's as clear as day that there's more to this connection than meets the eye. It's almost as if the thieves and the blender aficionados are engaging in an intricate dance, with one group taking and the other giving, albeit in entirely different contexts.
These findings have left us pondering the nature of this unusual relationship. Is there a criminal underground network of smoothie enthusiasts, feverishly purloining vehicles to power their blenders? Or perhaps there's a more innocent explanation, such as an unforeseen economic correlation or even a statistical fluke. The halfway point between skepticism and curiosity is where we find ourselves, tantalized by the mystery and eager to unwarp the tightly wound blend of variables intertwining in the great state of Mississippi.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a delightfully peculiar relationship between motor vehicle thefts and the number of blender tenders in Mississippi. The statistically robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value point to a connection as strong as a well-made smoothie. Indeed, it seems that the perpetrators of car theft are not just revving up their engines, but mirroring the rhythmic pulsations of the blender aficionados. As we blend together these unexpected findings, one can't help but wonder if there's a "blendestine" group orchestrating this curious dance between automotive larceny and culinary artistry.

While our results beckon the imagination with the allure of a suspenseful crime novel, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study. It's essential to approach these findings with a healthy dose of skepticism, as correlation does not imply causation. After all, it wouldn't be wise to jump to conclusions faster than a whirlwind blender mix.

Nevertheless, the evidence presents an enigmatic tableau that sparks both contemplation and whimsy. As we bid farewell to this captivating adventure of statistical exploration, we assert with confidence that no further research in this curious nexus of car theft and blender connoisseurs is warranted. It seems we've reached the zenith, or should we say the "Zenith blender setting," of this peculiar correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Absurd Inquiries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Absurd Scientific Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Great Mississippi Theft-a-Blender Conundrum with an abstract of In this study, we set out to tackle a perplexing yet strangely compelling question: Is there a connection between the motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi and the number of blender tenders in the state? Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we meticulously analyzed the perplexing correlation, seeking a blend of serious statistical analysis and some good ol' Southern charm. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9068316 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings suggest a surprisingly strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, leaving us wondering if there's a smoothie crime syndicate at play or if this is just a quirky coincidence. Join us in unraveling this unexpected intertwining of automotive larceny and blender aficionados.

ChatGPT:

Mississippi theft statistics, blender sales in Mississippi, correlation between crime and employment, statistical analysis of crime trends, automotive larceny correlation, unusual crime correlations, criminal justice statistics, crime syndicate connections, Southern charm in statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi
Detailed data title: The motor vehicle theft rate per 100,000 residents in Mississippi
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi

The number of blender tenders in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of mixing and blending machine setters, operators, and tenders in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of blender tenders in Mississippi

Correlation r = 0.9068316 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8223435 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of blender tenders in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-8. 0.0000000356776213681525300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 3.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 28,028,774 random variables You don't actually need 28 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi (Motor Vehicle Theft rate)312.1271.6257.6286.2246.4212.8184.2180.4164.8145146.6149.5142.9144.3145.4172.6192.1205191.7173.9
The number of blender tenders in Mississippi (Laborers)197019201840186017901450140013201220105082065086095010501040113012807501060




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([312.1,271.6,257.6,286.2,246.4,212.8,184.2,180.4,164.8,145,146.6,149.5,142.9,144.3,145.4,172.6,192.1,205,191.7,173.9,])
array_2 = np.array([1970,1920,1840,1860,1790,1450,1400,1320,1220,1050,820,650,860,950,1050,1040,1130,1280,750,1060,])
array_1_name = "Motor vehicle thefts in Mississippi"
array_2_name = "The number of blender tenders in Mississippi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2305 · Black Variable ID: 20143 · Red Variable ID: 10352
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0