about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,410 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the second variable is Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The lack of expertise in fitness studies led to a decline in the losing team's stamina and endurance, ultimately affecting their performance in the World Series. These teachers must have been secretly coaching the losing team on how to run the bases effectively!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image in the style of woodblock painting depicting a sprawling baseball field in Wyoming. A group of exhausted baseball players from the losing team in the World Series are shown struggling to cross home plate. The players appear fatigued and disheartened, lacking the energy and motivation to score runs. In the background, the university fitness studies teachers subtly appear to signify their decreased presence, contributing to the players' plight. The woodblock-style rendering should emphasize the fatigue and challenges faced by the players, with a focus on the decline in fitness expertise. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Woodblock painting Cutsy graphics a funny image macro Futuristic
ChatGPT: Woodblock painting

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series, in the following situation: As the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming has decreased, the overall fitness level of the losing team in the World Series has also taken a hit. Without the guidance and motivation from these teachers, the players are feeling the burn of defeat more than ever. It seems the lack of proper instruction and encouragement has left them running on empty, unable to cross home plate as frequently. It's a real stretch to connect these two variables, but it looks like the losing team's performance is feeling the weight of this decline in fitness expertise. And without that extra coaching, it seems their chances of reaching base have been gym-paired!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wyoming, the university fitness studies teachers have decreased in number. Meanwhile, the losing team in the World Series is struggling to score runs. The players appear fatigued and find it challenging to cross home plate. The decline in fitness expertise seems to have left them lacking the energy and motivation they need.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Woodblock painting ] and depicting this scene: In Wyoming, the university fitness studies teachers have decreased in number. Meanwhile, the losing team in the World Series is struggling to score runs. The players appear fatigued and find it challenging to cross home plate. The decline in fitness expertise seems to have left them lacking the energy and motivation they need. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image in the style of woodblock painting depicting a sprawling baseball field in Wyoming. A group of exhausted baseball players from the losing team in the World Series are shown struggling to cross home plate. The players appear fatigued and disheartened, lacking the energy and motivation to score runs. In the background, the university fitness studies teachers subtly appear to signify their decreased presence, contributing to the players' plight. The woodblock-style rendering should emphasize the fatigue and challenges faced by the players, with a focus on the decline in fitness expertise.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming caused Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

The Journal of Sport-Science Quirks and Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academia is often seen as a place of serious study, rigorous research, and intellectual pursuit. However, every now and then, there comes a study that takes an unconventional approach, raising eyebrows and piquing curiosity. The relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series certainly falls into this category.

As researchers, we are familiar with the dictum 'correlation does not imply causation.' However, the allure of uncovering a seemingly irrational connection between these variables was too tantalizing to resist. Combining the exacting precision of statistical analysis with the unpredictable whims of the baseball diamond, we set out to investigate whether there exists a substantial link between the profession of university fitness studies teachers in the sparsely populated state of Wyoming and the performance of the unfortunate losing team in the pinnacle of baseball contests, the World Series.

Integrated by data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, our analysis spans the period from 2003 to 2013. The initial exploration produced astonishing results - a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, squarely pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In essence, we were quantitatively validated in our pursuit of understanding the mysterious dance between academic professionals and the athletes on the diamond.

In this paper, we venture to unravel the intriguing connection between these distinct domains, endeavoring to bring to light the unexpected ways in which academic labor in the state of Wyoming may mirror or influence the athletic endeavors on the grand stage of the World Series. Moreover, our hope is to infuse a bit of humor and levity into the often staid realm of scholarly discourse, demonstrating that even in the realm of statistical research, there's room for a pitch-perfect pun or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia is often seen as a place of serious study, rigorous research, and intellectual pursuit. However, every now and then, there comes a study that takes an unconventional approach, raising eyebrows and piquing curiosity. The relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series certainly falls into this category.
As researchers, we are familiar with the dictum 'correlation does not imply causation.' However, the allure of uncovering a seemingly irrational connection between these variables was too tantalizing to resist. Combining the exacting precision of statistical analysis with the unpredictable whims of the baseball diamond, we set out to investigate whether there exists a substantial link between the profession of university fitness studies teachers in the sparsely populated state of Wyoming and the performance of the unfortunate losing team in the pinnacle of baseball contests, the World Series.
Integrated by data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, our analysis spans the period from 2003 to 2013. The initial exploration produced astonishing results - a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, squarely pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In essence, we were quantitatively validated in our pursuit of understanding the mysterious dance between academic professionals and the athletes on the diamond.
In this paper, we venture to unravel the intriguing connection between these distinct domains, endeavoring to bring to light the unexpected ways in which academic labor in the state of Wyoming may mirror or influence the athletic endeavors on the grand stage of the World Series. Moreover, our hope is to infuse a bit of humor and levity into the often staid realm of scholarly discourse, demonstrating that even in the realm of statistical research, there's room for a pitch-perfect pun or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The extant literature surrounding the relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series is, perhaps unsurprisingly, sparse. However, Smith (2010) laid a foundation for our research by positing a theoretical framework that delineates the potential interplay between educational pursuits and athletic performance. Doe (2012) furthered this discourse with a qualitative exploration of the psychological factors underlying the teaching of fitness studies in regions characterized by vast open spaces, postulating potential influences on the global sports stage. Nevertheless, a comprehensive empirical investigation into this peculiar connection has been conspicuously absent.

In "The Role of Sports in Society" by Jones (2008), the author explores the impact of athletics on various facets of human life, although regrettably there is no explicit mention of the impact of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming on the World Series. "Sportonomics" by Sports Illustrated (2016) delves into the economic and sociological dimensions of sports, providing a compelling backdrop for our interdisciplinary inquiry. On the more speculative side, "The Physics of Baseball" by Adair (2002) presents a scientific analysis of the game, offering an intriguing perspective that may indirectly inform our understanding of the interwoven relationship between academic professionals and baseball performers.

Moving to the world of fiction, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis (2003) delves into the statistical revolution in baseball, raising the tantalizing prospect of unearthing hidden patterns and correlations that may transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. Meanwhile, "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" by James Thurber (1939) presents a whimsical journey into imagination and alternate realities, serving as a metaphorical reminder that in the landscape of academic inquiry, unexpected connections may indeed materialize in the unlikeliest of places.

Additionally, in a rather unorthodox approach, the researchers also perused a series of seemingly unrelated items, including but not limited to grocery lists, tabloid headlines, and even the enigmatic contents of CVS receipts, in a valiant attempt to extract any semblance of insight, no matter how far-fetched, into the curious correlation under investigation. Alas, this scattershot foray yielded no discernible link between university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the World Series, save for an impromptu purchase of peanuts and Cracker Jacks, the traditional ballpark fare, perhaps suggesting a subliminal influence on the outcome of baseball games.

In the absence of substantial prior research directly addressing our inquiry, we find ourselves charting new territory and breaking ground in the delightful pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic ties between academic academia and athletic achievement, unapologetically infusing our analysis with a dash of levity and whimsy for good measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia is often seen as a place of serious study, rigorous research, and intellectual pursuit. However, every now and then, there comes a study that takes an unconventional approach, raising eyebrows and piquing curiosity. The relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series certainly falls into this category.
As researchers, we are familiar with the dictum 'correlation does not imply causation.' However, the allure of uncovering a seemingly irrational connection between these variables was too tantalizing to resist. Combining the exacting precision of statistical analysis with the unpredictable whims of the baseball diamond, we set out to investigate whether there exists a substantial link between the profession of university fitness studies teachers in the sparsely populated state of Wyoming and the performance of the unfortunate losing team in the pinnacle of baseball contests, the World Series.
Integrated by data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, our analysis spans the period from 2003 to 2013. The initial exploration produced astonishing results - a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, squarely pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In essence, we were quantitatively validated in our pursuit of understanding the mysterious dance between academic professionals and the athletes on the diamond.
In this paper, we venture to unravel the intriguing connection between these distinct domains, endeavoring to bring to light the unexpected ways in which academic labor in the state of Wyoming may mirror or influence the athletic endeavors on the grand stage of the World Series. Moreover, our hope is to infuse a bit of humor and levity into the often staid realm of scholarly discourse, demonstrating that even in the realm of statistical research, there's room for a pitch-perfect pun or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sampling Strategy: Our research team employed a rather unconventional sampling strategy, incorporating a mix of systematic random sampling and, dare we say, a dash of serendipity. To begin, we selected every nth mention of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming from the Bureau of Labor Statistics databanks. Then, as a nod to the unpredictable nature of baseball, we randomly chose dates corresponding to the World Series from the past decade on which to focus our investigation. While some may regard this approach as nontraditional, we found it to be both exhilarating and ripe for unexpected correlations.

Data Collection: Leveraging the power of the internet, our data collection process involved scouring through various online sources, with particular reliance on the Bureau of Labor Statistics for employment figures and Wikipedia for World Series scores. With a keen eye for detail, we meticulously documented the numbers of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in each World Series game from 2003 to 2013. Any discrepancies or irregularities were resolved through rigorous cross-referencing and a healthy dose of skepticism, ensuring the integrity of our dataset.

Statistical Analysis: Armed with our meticulously curated dataset, we paused briefly to marvel at the sheer audacity of our research pursuits before delving into the heart of our statistical analysis. Employing the venerable tools of correlation and regression analysis, we sought to identify any meaningful association between the aforementioned variables. Discriminating against the temptation to engage in statistical chicanery, we adhered to the principles of hypothesis testing with utmost rigor, keeping our tongues firmly in our cheeks at all times.

Control Variables: To mitigate any potential lurking variables conspiring to confound our findings, we conscientiously considered a range of control variables. Factors such as the weather on the day of each World Series game, the price of popcorn at the stadiums, and the regional popularity of hot dogs were integrated into our multivariate regression models, ensuring that our analysis encapsulated the nuanced complexities of both academia and athletic competition.

Robustness Checks: No statistical journey would be complete without subjecting our results to a battery of robustness checks. We examined various sub-samples, performed sensitivity analyses, and even entertained the notion of invoking the spirit of a benevolent ghost statistician for good measure. At every turn, we remained steadfast in our commitment to upholding the integrity of our findings, all while embracing the capricious spirit of academic curiosity.

Ethical Considerations: Mindful of the weighty responsibility that comes with wielding statistical methodologies, we maintained a steadfast commitment to ethical research conduct throughout our inquiry. All data sources were accurately credited, and the privacy of individual university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming (and any beleaguered members of losing World Series teams) was zealously safeguarded. We are confident that our research will serve as a testament to the enduring harmony between academic inquiry and statistical merriment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2003 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.8218574, r-squared of 0.6754496, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academia is often seen as a place of serious study, rigorous research, and intellectual pursuit. However, every now and then, there comes a study that takes an unconventional approach, raising eyebrows and piquing curiosity. The relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series certainly falls into this category.
As researchers, we are familiar with the dictum 'correlation does not imply causation.' However, the allure of uncovering a seemingly irrational connection between these variables was too tantalizing to resist. Combining the exacting precision of statistical analysis with the unpredictable whims of the baseball diamond, we set out to investigate whether there exists a substantial link between the profession of university fitness studies teachers in the sparsely populated state of Wyoming and the performance of the unfortunate losing team in the pinnacle of baseball contests, the World Series.
Integrated by data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, our analysis spans the period from 2003 to 2013. The initial exploration produced astonishing results - a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, squarely pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In essence, we were quantitatively validated in our pursuit of understanding the mysterious dance between academic professionals and the athletes on the diamond.
In this paper, we venture to unravel the intriguing connection between these distinct domains, endeavoring to bring to light the unexpected ways in which academic labor in the state of Wyoming may mirror or influence the athletic endeavors on the grand stage of the World Series. Moreover, our hope is to infuse a bit of humor and levity into the often staid realm of scholarly discourse, demonstrating that even in the realm of statistical research, there's room for a pitch-perfect pun or two.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting the comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, our research team unearthed intriguing findings that challenge conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.8218574 revealed a strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables, while the r-squared value of 0.6754496 underscored the robustness of this statistical relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results indicated a significant connection that defies mere happenstance.

As evidenced in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation, affirming the unexpected link between the academic landscape of Wyoming and the outcomes on the baseball field. The dispersion of data points around the best-fit line highlights the compelling nature of this unanticipated connection, prompting further contemplation on the interplay between these divergent realms.

In essence, our findings not only confirm the substantial statistical relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series but also invite a deeper exploration of the complex dynamics at play. This research serves as a whimsical reminder that amidst the rigors of academia and the intensity of competitive sports, peculiar correlations may lurk, waiting to be uncovered by inquisitive minds.

In essence, it seems that in the grand symphony of intellectual pursuits and athletic endeavors, the harmony between the realm of academia in Wyoming and the fate of losing teams in the World Series resonates in a crescendo that defies traditional rationalization, inviting a blend of statistical expertise and playful curiosity to decode its enigmatic melodies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The extant literature surrounding the relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series is, perhaps unsurprisingly, sparse. However, Smith (2010) laid a foundation for our research by positing a theoretical framework that delineates the potential interplay between educational pursuits and athletic performance. Doe (2012) furthered this discourse with a qualitative exploration of the psychological factors underlying the teaching of fitness studies in regions characterized by vast open spaces, postulating potential influences on the global sports stage. Nevertheless, a comprehensive empirical investigation into this peculiar connection has been conspicuously absent.
In "The Role of Sports in Society" by Jones (2008), the author explores the impact of athletics on various facets of human life, although regrettably there is no explicit mention of the impact of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming on the World Series. "Sportonomics" by Sports Illustrated (2016) delves into the economic and sociological dimensions of sports, providing a compelling backdrop for our interdisciplinary inquiry. On the more speculative side, "The Physics of Baseball" by Adair (2002) presents a scientific analysis of the game, offering an intriguing perspective that may indirectly inform our understanding of the interwoven relationship between academic professionals and baseball performers.
Moving to the world of fiction, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis (2003) delves into the statistical revolution in baseball, raising the tantalizing prospect of unearthing hidden patterns and correlations that may transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. Meanwhile, "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" by James Thurber (1939) presents a whimsical journey into imagination and alternate realities, serving as a metaphorical reminder that in the landscape of academic inquiry, unexpected connections may indeed materialize in the unlikeliest of places.
Additionally, in a rather unorthodox approach, the researchers also perused a series of seemingly unrelated items, including but not limited to grocery lists, tabloid headlines, and even the enigmatic contents of CVS receipts, in a valiant attempt to extract any semblance of insight, no matter how far-fetched, into the curious correlation under investigation. Alas, this scattershot foray yielded no discernible link between university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the World Series, save for an impromptu purchase of peanuts and Cracker Jacks, the traditional ballpark fare, perhaps suggesting a subliminal influence on the outcome of baseball games.
In the absence of substantial prior research directly addressing our inquiry, we find ourselves charting new territory and breaking ground in the delightful pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic ties between academic academia and athletic achievement, unapologetically infusing our analysis with a dash of levity and whimsy for good measure.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, our research team unearthed intriguing findings that challenge conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.8218574 revealed a strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables, while the r-squared value of 0.6754496 underscored the robustness of this statistical relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results indicated a significant connection that defies mere happenstance.
As evidenced in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation, affirming the unexpected link between the academic landscape of Wyoming and the outcomes on the baseball field. The dispersion of data points around the best-fit line highlights the compelling nature of this unanticipated connection, prompting further contemplation on the interplay between these divergent realms.
In essence, our findings not only confirm the substantial statistical relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series but also invite a deeper exploration of the complex dynamics at play. This research serves as a whimsical reminder that amidst the rigors of academia and the intensity of competitive sports, peculiar correlations may lurk, waiting to be uncovered by inquisitive minds.
In essence, it seems that in the grand symphony of intellectual pursuits and athletic endeavors, the harmony between the realm of academia in Wyoming and the fate of losing teams in the World Series resonates in a crescendo that defies traditional rationalization, inviting a blend of statistical expertise and playful curiosity to decode its enigmatic melodies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unveiled a rather unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical link between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. While this may sound like the setup for a punchline, the robust statistical evidence we've uncovered indicates a meaningful relationship between these apparently disparate variables. It seems that the academic pursuits in Wyoming and the fortunes of losing baseball teams may not be as unrelated as one might assume.

Given the sparse existing literature on this peculiar correlation, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, breaking new ground that even Lewis and Clark might envy. Our findings build upon the theoretical groundwork laid by Smith (2010) and the qualitative musings of Doe (2012) in their attempts to understand the nuances of teaching fitness studies in the wide-open spaces of Wyoming. With a nod to the whimsy of Thurber's "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" and the tantalizing prospect of hidden patterns in "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis, our research breathes life into the unexplored connections between academia and athletic achievement.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8218574 we've uncovered echoes the resounding crack of a metaphorical home run, signaling the strength of the association between our two seemingly incongruous variables. This statistical relationship, supported by the r-squared value of 0.6754496 and a p-value of less than 0.01, challenges our preconceived notions and beckons us to contemplate the enigmatic forces at play.

While one might be inclined to chalk this up to mere happenstance or cosmic coincidence, our scatterplot in Figure 1 plants this connection firmly in the realm of statistical significance. The dispersion of data points around the best-fit line provides a visual testament to the unexpected correlation, inspired by the academic enclave of Wyoming and reverberating across the baseball diamonds of the World Series.

In conclusion, it seems that beneath the serious facade of academia and the fierce competition of sports, there lies a whimsical dance of interconnectedness. Our research serves as a lighthearted reminder that sometimes, truth is indeed stranger than fiction, and the most unforeseen connections may have a statistical basis. As we venture beyond the confines of traditional research, let us continue to embrace the unexpected, infusing our inquiries with a touch of humor and curiosity to unravel the marvels hidden within our data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academia is often seen as a place of serious study, rigorous research, and intellectual pursuit. However, every now and then, there comes a study that takes an unconventional approach, raising eyebrows and piquing curiosity. The relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series certainly falls into this category.
As researchers, we are familiar with the dictum 'correlation does not imply causation.' However, the allure of uncovering a seemingly irrational connection between these variables was too tantalizing to resist. Combining the exacting precision of statistical analysis with the unpredictable whims of the baseball diamond, we set out to investigate whether there exists a substantial link between the profession of university fitness studies teachers in the sparsely populated state of Wyoming and the performance of the unfortunate losing team in the pinnacle of baseball contests, the World Series.
Integrated by data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, our analysis spans the period from 2003 to 2013. The initial exploration produced astonishing results - a correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, squarely pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. In essence, we were quantitatively validated in our pursuit of understanding the mysterious dance between academic professionals and the athletes on the diamond.
In this paper, we venture to unravel the intriguing connection between these distinct domains, endeavoring to bring to light the unexpected ways in which academic labor in the state of Wyoming may mirror or influence the athletic endeavors on the grand stage of the World Series. Moreover, our hope is to infuse a bit of humor and levity into the often staid realm of scholarly discourse, demonstrating that even in the realm of statistical research, there's room for a pitch-perfect pun or two.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting the comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, our research team unearthed intriguing findings that challenge conventional wisdom. The correlation coefficient of 0.8218574 revealed a strong positive association between these seemingly disparate variables, while the r-squared value of 0.6754496 underscored the robustness of this statistical relationship. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the results indicated a significant connection that defies mere happenstance.
As evidenced in Figure 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the pronounced correlation, affirming the unexpected link between the academic landscape of Wyoming and the outcomes on the baseball field. The dispersion of data points around the best-fit line highlights the compelling nature of this unanticipated connection, prompting further contemplation on the interplay between these divergent realms.
In essence, our findings not only confirm the substantial statistical relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series but also invite a deeper exploration of the complex dynamics at play. This research serves as a whimsical reminder that amidst the rigors of academia and the intensity of competitive sports, peculiar correlations may lurk, waiting to be uncovered by inquisitive minds.
In essence, it seems that in the grand symphony of intellectual pursuits and athletic endeavors, the harmony between the realm of academia in Wyoming and the fate of losing teams in the World Series resonates in a crescendo that defies traditional rationalization, inviting a blend of statistical expertise and playful curiosity to decode its enigmatic melodies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light an unexpected and robust statistical relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. While this correlation may seem as unlikely as a snowball fight in the Sahara, the numbers don't lie.

We have unraveled a mysterious dance between academic pursuits and athletic outcomes, leaving us in awe of the serendipitous connection between these seemingly incongruous realms. It's as if a wizard is pulling the strings behind the scenes, orchestrating a symphony of sweat and sprints, all while sipping tea in the lofty halls of academia.

However, this research being the final inning, we feel confident in stating that no further inquiries are needed in this bizarre and bewildering realm. It's no use flogging a dead horse or, in this case, a losing baseball team. As they say, some things are better left unexplained, like why anyone ever thought the mullet hairstyle was a good idea.

With that said, it's time to wrap up this wild ride. We hope this study not only tickled your statistical fancy but also showed that even in the world of academia and sports, there's always room for the unexpected, the peculiar, and of course, a good laugh or two. Thank you, and may the correlations be ever in your favor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sport-Science Quirks and Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cross-Cultural Fitness and Sports Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fit to Be Tied: An Analytical Examination of University Fitness Studies Teachers in Wyoming and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series with an abstract of This paper delves into the unlikely relationship between the number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. By combining data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2013. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8218574, with a p-value of less than 0.01, pointing to a robust statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Through this research, we aim to shed light on the unexpected ways in which the world of academia and the realm of sports intersect, and perhaps even inspire a few chuckles along the way.

ChatGPT:

university fitness studies teachers Wyoming, runs scored losing team World Series, correlation university fitness studies teachers, World Series runs scored, academia sports intersection, relationship academia sports, statistical relationship academia sports

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of recreation and fitness studies teachers, postsecondary in Wyoming
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming

Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series

Correlation r = 0.8218574 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6754496 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming) over the 11 years from 2003 through 2013.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0019. 0.0019109764878903860000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.19% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 523 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.44, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013
The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming (Laborers)5030403040506050603030
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series (Runs scored)211214111015271230614




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,30,40,30,40,50,60,50,60,30,30,])
array_2 = np.array([21,12,14,11,10,15,27,12,30,6,14,])
array_1_name = "The number of university fitness studies teachers in Wyoming"
array_2_name = "Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2410 · Black Variable ID: 16442 · Red Variable ID: 535
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0