about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,221 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cruz and the second variable is The number of statisticians in Alabama.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps it's because they wanted to be on the 'Cruz' to statistical success! Or maybe there's a secret statistical formula that correlates the two, you know, like the 'Cruz Coefficient' or the 'Standard Deviation of Cruz's Law.' It could also be a case of data analysis revealing that the name 'Cruz' has a strong positive correlation with number crunching!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image inspired by the idea of a Discovery magazine cover that showcases a bustling town in Alabama. The scene includes a prominent billboard proudly displaying the popularity of the first name "Cruz," while families excitedly name their newborns Cruz. Meanwhile, a line of eager statisticians forms outside a newly opened office, indicating the rise in statisticians to help people plan and budget for dream cruises. The visual should capture the essence of the bustling town, the billboard, families celebrating, and the line of statisticians, embodying the increasing trend. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art A Discovery magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration Oragami Brutalism
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama, in the following situation: Because the name Cruz became popular, more people started daydreaming about going on cruises. These daydreamers sought out statisticians in Alabama to help them plan and budget for their dream vacations, causing an increase in the number of statisticians in the state.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town in Alabama, a billboard proudly displays the popularity of the first name Cruz, with families happily naming their newborns Cruz. Meanwhile, down the street, a line of eager statisticians forms outside a newly opened office, signaling the increase in the number of statisticians in Alabama to help people plan and budget for their dream cruises.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town in Alabama, a billboard proudly displays the popularity of the first name Cruz, with families happily naming their newborns Cruz. Meanwhile, down the street, a line of eager statisticians forms outside a newly opened office, signaling the increase in the number of statisticians in Alabama to help people plan and budget for their dream cruises. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image inspired by the idea of a Discovery magazine cover that showcases a bustling town in Alabama. The scene includes a prominent billboard proudly displaying the popularity of the first name "Cruz," while families excitedly name their newborns Cruz. Meanwhile, a line of eager statisticians forms outside a newly opened office, indicating the rise in statisticians to help people plan and budget for dream cruises. The visual should capture the essence of the bustling town, the billboard, families celebrating, and the line of statisticians, embodying the increasing trend.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Cruz caused The number of statisticians in Alabama to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

The Journal of Eccentric Statistical Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the illustrious realm of nomenclature studies, the interplay between names and professions has long intrigued researchers, with inquiries ranging from the moniker's influence on career choices to its societal connotations. In this vein, the name 'Cruz' has emerged as a subject of curiosity, with its increasing popularity prompting speculation about potential implications on specific occupational domains. Our study delves into this fascinating intersection by examining the correlation between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the workforce of statisticians in the state of Alabama.

While our subject matter may seem lighthearted at first glance, the implications of our findings promise to illuminate the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature and its ramifications on professional pursuits. As we delve into the data, it becomes clear that the connection between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical field is no mere statistical aberration, but a noteworthy phenomenon that merits attention and piques curiosity.

Our investigation leverages rich datasets from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebb and flow of the name 'Cruz' across decades, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive insights into the population of statisticians laboring over numbers in the heart of Dixie. With rigorous statistical analyses and unyielding methodological precision, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar rapport between nomenclature trends and occupational choices.

As we embark on this empirical journey, we invite the reader to savor not only the substantive findings but also the whimsical nuances that permeate our exploration. After all, who could resist the allure of unpacking the statistical implications of a name that sounds like a harbinger of oceanic adventures while also evoking thoughts of math and data wizardry? Join us as we Cruz through the data and embark on a statistical odyssey that promises both scholarly insights and a sprinkle of levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious realm of nomenclature studies, the interplay between names and professions has long intrigued researchers, with inquiries ranging from the moniker's influence on career choices to its societal connotations. In this vein, the name 'Cruz' has emerged as a subject of curiosity, with its increasing popularity prompting speculation about potential implications on specific occupational domains. Our study delves into this fascinating intersection by examining the correlation between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the workforce of statisticians in the state of Alabama.
While our subject matter may seem lighthearted at first glance, the implications of our findings promise to illuminate the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature and its ramifications on professional pursuits. As we delve into the data, it becomes clear that the connection between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical field is no mere statistical aberration, but a noteworthy phenomenon that merits attention and piques curiosity.
Our investigation leverages rich datasets from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebb and flow of the name 'Cruz' across decades, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive insights into the population of statisticians laboring over numbers in the heart of Dixie. With rigorous statistical analyses and unyielding methodological precision, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar rapport between nomenclature trends and occupational choices.
As we embark on this empirical journey, we invite the reader to savor not only the substantive findings but also the whimsical nuances that permeate our exploration. After all, who could resist the allure of unpacking the statistical implications of a name that sounds like a harbinger of oceanic adventures while also evoking thoughts of math and data wizardry? Join us as we Cruz through the data and embark on a statistical odyssey that promises both scholarly insights and a sprinkle of levity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama builds upon existing literature that explores the correlation between nomenclature trends and occupational distributions. Smith and Doe (2010) have laid the groundwork for such inquiries, examining the influence of names on career choices and shedding light on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and professional pursuits. Furthermore, Jones (2015) delved into the societal connotations of names, providing a comprehensive analysis of how names can shape individuals' paths.

Moving on from the serious studies, let us consider some enlightening non-fiction works that could offer insights, albeit indirectly, into our curious exploration. In "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, the authors unravel unexpected connections and unorthodox correlations, much like our endeavor in uncovering the relationship between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical domain. Additionally, "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell offers a compelling narrative on the factors that contribute to success, prompting us to ponder whether 'Cruz' could be an outlier in the statistical landscape.

Delving into the realm of fiction, we encounter literary works that captivate the imagination and offer tantalizing parallels to our study. In "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, cryptic connections unravel within the plot, echoing the enigmatic correlation between 'Cruz' and statisticians. Similarly, in Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea," the spirit of adventure resonates, akin to the allure of unraveling statistical mysteries associated with the name 'Cruz.'

Expanding our sources beyond the conventional, we draw inspiration from unlikely quarters. Our exploratory foray includes perusing childhood cartoons and shows to capture the essence of 'Cruz.' After meticulously watching episodes of "Dora the Explorer," we cannot help but appreciate the adventurous spirit that seems to emanate from the name 'Cruz'—a spirit that could potentially attract individuals to the captivating world of statistics.

In sum, our literature review not only draws from traditional academic sources but also ventures into the realms of fiction, non-fiction, and even children's programming to enrich our understanding of the peculiar rapport between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical landscape. With a diverse array of inspirations at our disposal, we dare to embark on a scholarly pursuit that promises to be both illuminating and delightfully unconventional.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious realm of nomenclature studies, the interplay between names and professions has long intrigued researchers, with inquiries ranging from the moniker's influence on career choices to its societal connotations. In this vein, the name 'Cruz' has emerged as a subject of curiosity, with its increasing popularity prompting speculation about potential implications on specific occupational domains. Our study delves into this fascinating intersection by examining the correlation between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the workforce of statisticians in the state of Alabama.
While our subject matter may seem lighthearted at first glance, the implications of our findings promise to illuminate the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature and its ramifications on professional pursuits. As we delve into the data, it becomes clear that the connection between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical field is no mere statistical aberration, but a noteworthy phenomenon that merits attention and piques curiosity.
Our investigation leverages rich datasets from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebb and flow of the name 'Cruz' across decades, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive insights into the population of statisticians laboring over numbers in the heart of Dixie. With rigorous statistical analyses and unyielding methodological precision, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar rapport between nomenclature trends and occupational choices.
As we embark on this empirical journey, we invite the reader to savor not only the substantive findings but also the whimsical nuances that permeate our exploration. After all, who could resist the allure of unpacking the statistical implications of a name that sounds like a harbinger of oceanic adventures while also evoking thoughts of math and data wizardry? Join us as we Cruz through the data and embark on a statistical odyssey that promises both scholarly insights and a sprinkle of levity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic relationship between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the cohort of industrious statisticians in Alabama, our methodology employed an array of analytical approaches that were as diverse as the anecdotal connections one might make at a family reunion. Our intrepid research team scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the digital cornucopia of data sources to capture the elusive essence of 'Cruz' and the statistical landscape of Alabama. Our primary sources of data hailed from the venerable archives of the US Social Security Administration, where the ebb and flow of 'Cruz' nomenclature danced through the annals of time, much like a statistical waltz. Complementing this, we ventured into the bastion of labor insights, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, to glean the numerical resonance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie.

The temporal scope of our inquiry spanned from the halcyon days of 2003 to the modern era of 2022, a veritable odyssey across the chronicles of nomenclature and statistical prowess. With the aid of advanced statistical software, we embarked on a quest to unravel the purported correlation between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical workforce in Alabama. Utilizing an eclectic fusion of regression analyses, time series models, and probabilistic frameworks, we endeavored to disentangle the web of statistical intrigue that lay dormant beneath the surface of nomenclature trends.

Moreover, our methodological purview extended to the whimsical realm of qualitative inquiry, as we sought to capture the narrative essence of individuals bearing the name 'Cruz' who found themselves drawn to the captivating domain of statistics. Through a series of anecdotal interviews and thematic content analysis, we endeavored to encapsulate the idiosyncratic allure that beckons individuals with this moniker to embark on a journey with numbers, much like sailors navigating the tempestuous seas of data.

In essence, our methodology constituted a harmonious symphony of quantitative rigidity and qualitative poignancy, weaving a tapestry of empirical exploration and whimsical revelation that transcended the confines of conventional scholarly pursuits. With unwavering resolve and an allegorical twinkle in our eye, we channeled the spirit of both the empiricist and the bard to capture the full spectrum of the 'Cruz' phenomenon and its curious entwinement with the world of statistics in Alabama.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8377489, r-squared of 0.7018232, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the illustrious realm of nomenclature studies, the interplay between names and professions has long intrigued researchers, with inquiries ranging from the moniker's influence on career choices to its societal connotations. In this vein, the name 'Cruz' has emerged as a subject of curiosity, with its increasing popularity prompting speculation about potential implications on specific occupational domains. Our study delves into this fascinating intersection by examining the correlation between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the workforce of statisticians in the state of Alabama.
While our subject matter may seem lighthearted at first glance, the implications of our findings promise to illuminate the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature and its ramifications on professional pursuits. As we delve into the data, it becomes clear that the connection between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical field is no mere statistical aberration, but a noteworthy phenomenon that merits attention and piques curiosity.
Our investigation leverages rich datasets from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebb and flow of the name 'Cruz' across decades, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive insights into the population of statisticians laboring over numbers in the heart of Dixie. With rigorous statistical analyses and unyielding methodological precision, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar rapport between nomenclature trends and occupational choices.
As we embark on this empirical journey, we invite the reader to savor not only the substantive findings but also the whimsical nuances that permeate our exploration. After all, who could resist the allure of unpacking the statistical implications of a name that sounds like a harbinger of oceanic adventures while also evoking thoughts of math and data wizardry? Join us as we Cruz through the data and embark on a statistical odyssey that promises both scholarly insights and a sprinkle of levity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8377489, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the name 'Cruz' gains popularity, so does the army of number-crunching statisticians in the heart of Dixie. This correlation coefficient, known in some circles as the "Cruztastic Correlation Coefficient," embodies the undeniable bond between nomenclature trends and the statistical workforce, proving that the name 'Cruz' is not just "Cruz-ing" through the data unnoticed.

The r-squared value of 0.7018232 further underscores the substantial influence of the name 'Cruz' on the labor force of statisticians in Alabama, capturing 70.18% of the variance in the number of statisticians. It seems that the influence of the name 'Cruz' on statistical pursuits cannot be underestimated, as it explains a significant portion of the variation in the abundance of number-savvy professionals in the state.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the frequency of the name 'Cruz' and the population of statisticians in Alabama. This finding is as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data points, reaffirming the legitimacy of our results and highlighting the statistical prowess of the name 'Cruz' in the realm of occupational choices.

As the data points in Figure 1 elegantly demonstrate, there is a clear and visually striking positive association between the popularity of the name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the resounding impact of nomenclature trends on occupational demographics, painting a compelling picture of the intertwined destinies of the name 'Cruz' and statistical expertise in the heart of Dixie.

In summary, our empirical investigation has unearthed a convincing correlation between the prominence of the name 'Cruz' and the populace of statisticians in Alabama, providing a compelling glimpse into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and professional pursuits. These findings not only enrich our understanding of the underlying dynamics but also add a dash of quirkiness to the hallowed halls of statistical study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the relationship between the popularity of the first name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama builds upon existing literature that explores the correlation between nomenclature trends and occupational distributions. Smith and Doe (2010) have laid the groundwork for such inquiries, examining the influence of names on career choices and shedding light on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and professional pursuits. Furthermore, Jones (2015) delved into the societal connotations of names, providing a comprehensive analysis of how names can shape individuals' paths.
Moving on from the serious studies, let us consider some enlightening non-fiction works that could offer insights, albeit indirectly, into our curious exploration. In "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, the authors unravel unexpected connections and unorthodox correlations, much like our endeavor in uncovering the relationship between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical domain. Additionally, "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell offers a compelling narrative on the factors that contribute to success, prompting us to ponder whether 'Cruz' could be an outlier in the statistical landscape.
Delving into the realm of fiction, we encounter literary works that captivate the imagination and offer tantalizing parallels to our study. In "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, cryptic connections unravel within the plot, echoing the enigmatic correlation between 'Cruz' and statisticians. Similarly, in Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea," the spirit of adventure resonates, akin to the allure of unraveling statistical mysteries associated with the name 'Cruz.'
Expanding our sources beyond the conventional, we draw inspiration from unlikely quarters. Our exploratory foray includes perusing childhood cartoons and shows to capture the essence of 'Cruz.' After meticulously watching episodes of "Dora the Explorer," we cannot help but appreciate the adventurous spirit that seems to emanate from the name 'Cruz'—a spirit that could potentially attract individuals to the captivating world of statistics.
In sum, our literature review not only draws from traditional academic sources but also ventures into the realms of fiction, non-fiction, and even children's programming to enrich our understanding of the peculiar rapport between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical landscape. With a diverse array of inspirations at our disposal, we dare to embark on a scholarly pursuit that promises to be both illuminating and delightfully unconventional.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8377489, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the name 'Cruz' gains popularity, so does the army of number-crunching statisticians in the heart of Dixie. This correlation coefficient, known in some circles as the "Cruztastic Correlation Coefficient," embodies the undeniable bond between nomenclature trends and the statistical workforce, proving that the name 'Cruz' is not just "Cruz-ing" through the data unnoticed.
The r-squared value of 0.7018232 further underscores the substantial influence of the name 'Cruz' on the labor force of statisticians in Alabama, capturing 70.18% of the variance in the number of statisticians. It seems that the influence of the name 'Cruz' on statistical pursuits cannot be underestimated, as it explains a significant portion of the variation in the abundance of number-savvy professionals in the state.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the frequency of the name 'Cruz' and the population of statisticians in Alabama. This finding is as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data points, reaffirming the legitimacy of our results and highlighting the statistical prowess of the name 'Cruz' in the realm of occupational choices.
As the data points in Figure 1 elegantly demonstrate, there is a clear and visually striking positive association between the popularity of the name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the resounding impact of nomenclature trends on occupational demographics, painting a compelling picture of the intertwined destinies of the name 'Cruz' and statistical expertise in the heart of Dixie.
In summary, our empirical investigation has unearthed a convincing correlation between the prominence of the name 'Cruz' and the populace of statisticians in Alabama, providing a compelling glimpse into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and professional pursuits. These findings not only enrich our understanding of the underlying dynamics but also add a dash of quirkiness to the hallowed halls of statistical study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In line with prior research by Smith and Doe (2010), our study corroborates the notion that names indeed hold sway over occupational trajectories. The 'Cruztastic Correlation Coefficient' of 0.8377489 delineates a palpable link between the ascendancy of the name 'Cruz' and the proliferation of statisticians in Alabama, akin to the protagonist's inexorable quest for statistical prowess. Likewise, our findings align with Jones' (2015) comprehensive analysis by substantiating the societal resonance of names, underpinning the captivating sway of 'Cruz' in steering individuals towards the enthralling realm of statistics. The substantial r-squared value of 0.7018232 underscores the pervasive influence of the name 'Cruz' on the statisticians' landscape, akin to a name tag adorning the shoulders of statistical aficionados, signifying their alignment with the 'Cruzian' dimensions of number-crunching endeavors.

Recalling our literature review's unorthodox inclusions, it is worth noting the striking echoes of 'The Da Vinci Code' by Dan Brown, where cryptic correlations unravel within the plot, mirroring our expedition into the enigmatic connection between 'Cruz' and statisticians. Similarly, the spirit of adventure intertwines with our findings, much like the serendipitous discoveries in Jules Verne's "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea," as we delve into statistical mysteries ringing with the aura of 'Cruz'ian charm. In a somewhat unexpected parallel, the adventurous spirit emanating from 'Dora the Explorer' episodes surfaces once more, depicting an undeniably 'Cruz'-laden undercurrent that could beckon individuals to navigate the captivating statistical terrains, perhaps with a map and a backpack in tow.

As our results suggest, the statistical significance represented by the p-value of less than 0.01 resoundingly repudiates the null hypothesis, resonating with the unlikelihood of finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data points. It seems that the 'Cruz' name wields statistical prowess comparable to the discovery of that elusive four-leaf clover, reinforcing the legitimacy of our findings and epitomizing the statistical charm exuded by the name 'Cruz.'

In essence, our findings not only bolster the existing literature but also impart a whimsical allure to the seemingly staid universe of statistical inquiry, invoking a 'Cruz'-centric charisma that beckons mockery, sorry, I mean curiosity and mirthfulness in the scholarly pursuit of statistical revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cruz and The number of statisticians in Alabama. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama

[[ABSTRACT]]
The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the illustrious realm of nomenclature studies, the interplay between names and professions has long intrigued researchers, with inquiries ranging from the moniker's influence on career choices to its societal connotations. In this vein, the name 'Cruz' has emerged as a subject of curiosity, with its increasing popularity prompting speculation about potential implications on specific occupational domains. Our study delves into this fascinating intersection by examining the correlation between the prevalence of the name 'Cruz' and the workforce of statisticians in the state of Alabama.
While our subject matter may seem lighthearted at first glance, the implications of our findings promise to illuminate the whimsical dynamics of nomenclature and its ramifications on professional pursuits. As we delve into the data, it becomes clear that the connection between the name 'Cruz' and the statistical field is no mere statistical aberration, but a noteworthy phenomenon that merits attention and piques curiosity.
Our investigation leverages rich datasets from the US Social Security Administration, capturing the ebb and flow of the name 'Cruz' across decades, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing comprehensive insights into the population of statisticians laboring over numbers in the heart of Dixie. With rigorous statistical analyses and unyielding methodological precision, we endeavor to unravel the peculiar rapport between nomenclature trends and occupational choices.
As we embark on this empirical journey, we invite the reader to savor not only the substantive findings but also the whimsical nuances that permeate our exploration. After all, who could resist the allure of unpacking the statistical implications of a name that sounds like a harbinger of oceanic adventures while also evoking thoughts of math and data wizardry? Join us as we Cruz through the data and embark on a statistical odyssey that promises both scholarly insights and a sprinkle of levity.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8377489, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. In other words, it seems that as the name 'Cruz' gains popularity, so does the army of number-crunching statisticians in the heart of Dixie. This correlation coefficient, known in some circles as the "Cruztastic Correlation Coefficient," embodies the undeniable bond between nomenclature trends and the statistical workforce, proving that the name 'Cruz' is not just "Cruz-ing" through the data unnoticed.
The r-squared value of 0.7018232 further underscores the substantial influence of the name 'Cruz' on the labor force of statisticians in Alabama, capturing 70.18% of the variance in the number of statisticians. It seems that the influence of the name 'Cruz' on statistical pursuits cannot be underestimated, as it explains a significant portion of the variation in the abundance of number-savvy professionals in the state.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the frequency of the name 'Cruz' and the population of statisticians in Alabama. This finding is as statistically significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data points, reaffirming the legitimacy of our results and highlighting the statistical prowess of the name 'Cruz' in the realm of occupational choices.
As the data points in Figure 1 elegantly demonstrate, there is a clear and visually striking positive association between the popularity of the name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama. The scatterplot serves as a testament to the resounding impact of nomenclature trends on occupational demographics, painting a compelling picture of the intertwined destinies of the name 'Cruz' and statistical expertise in the heart of Dixie.
In summary, our empirical investigation has unearthed a convincing correlation between the prominence of the name 'Cruz' and the populace of statisticians in Alabama, providing a compelling glimpse into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and professional pursuits. These findings not only enrich our understanding of the underlying dynamics but also add a dash of quirkiness to the hallowed halls of statistical study.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a noteworthy correlation between the popularity of the name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama. The "Cruztastic Correlation Coefficient" of 0.8377489 and the associated p-value of less than 0.01 emphasize the substantial relationship between these variables, leaving no room for statistical indifference. It appears that the name 'Cruz' is not merely a passing wave in the sea of nomenclature but a significant force that propels the statistical ship in the heart of Dixie.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the confines of conventional statistical discourse, teasing the depths of whimsical intricacies in nomenclature and professional choices. It seems that the allure of 'Cruz' extends far beyond beachside daydreams, captivating the numerical acumen of Alabama's statistical workforce with unparalleled prowess. The influence of nomenclature on occupational demographics, much like a statistical magician, continues to surprise and beguile.

One might even say that the name 'Cruz' doesn't just coast by unnoticed; it charts a course for statistical relevance that is as clear as a sunny day on the shores of statistical significance.

As we reflect on the whimsical dance of data and nomenclature, it becomes evident that our study not only enriches the scholarly landscape but also injects a surge of vitality into the otherwise stoic realm of statistical inquiry. The looming question of whether the popularity of a name can shape professional trajectories has been answered with a resounding affirmative; it seems that the name 'Cruz' is more than a mere moniker – it's a statistical call to action.

In light of these findings, we assert that further research in this domain is akin to hunting for statistical treasures in a field of name associations. It seems that we've charted the statistical seas of 'Cruz' with finesse, leaving no statistical stone unturned. Therefore, we declare with confidence that the connection between the popularity of the name 'Cruz' and the number of statisticians in Alabama has been thoroughly explored, and no more research is needed in this area. It's time to let the statistical tides carry us to new shores of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Quirky Statistical Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cruzin' with Statistics: Examining the Relationship Between the Popularity of the Name Cruz and the Number of Statisticians in Alabama with an abstract of The prevalence of the name 'Cruz' has garnered attention in recent years, prompting our investigation into its potential impact on the statistical field in Alabama. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we set out to elucidate the connection between the frequency of the first name 'Cruz' and the abundance of statisticians in the heart of Dixie. Employing rigorous statistical methodology, we unveil a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8377489 and a remarkably significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2003 to 2022. Our findings not only shed light on the disproportionate representation of 'Cruz' aficionados in the world of statistics but also cast a spotlight on the whimsical intricacies of nomenclature and occupational pursuits.

ChatGPT:

"name Cruz" popularity statistics, Cruz name frequency Alabama, Statisticians Alabama population correlation, social security administration data analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics Alabama statisticians, name correlation coefficient analysis, nomenclature and occupational pursuits, statistical methodology for name frequency analysis, significance of name Cruz in statistical field, Cruz name impact on statistical field

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Cruz
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Cruz
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Cruz

The number of statisticians in Alabama
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of statisticians in Alabama
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of statisticians in Alabama

Correlation r = 0.8377489 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7018232 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of statisticians in Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Cruz) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.04E-6. 0.0000040420595888466990000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.000404% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 247,399 random variables You don't actually need 247 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Cruz (Babies born)375433496544700873923101311271264127712511092103699410451134112111491084
The number of statisticians in Alabama (Statisticians)1407050150180180160230240230250250220170180170220210180180




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([375,433,496,544,700,873,923,1013,1127,1264,1277,1251,1092,1036,994,1045,1134,1121,1149,1084,])
array_2 = np.array([140,70,50,150,180,180,160,230,240,230,250,250,220,170,180,170,220,210,180,180,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Cruz"
array_2_name = "The number of statisticians in Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 3221 · Black Variable ID: 3452 · Red Variable ID: 4447
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0