about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,483 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of authors in Maine and the second variable is Robberies in the US.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It's simple: with fewer authors in Maine, there were less "break-in" the writing scene, leading to a reduction in literary heists and plot thievery. It seems the main story here is that as the author population dwindled, so did the criminal "prose." Looks like the pen really is mightier than the sword, especially when it comes to keeping crime endings from becoming too predictable!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image representing a humorous scenario inspired by the decrease in criminal activity due to the dwindling number of authors in a small room in Maine. Capture the vibe of a bustling writing space with authors industriously working at their desks, deserting one by one, leaving their untouched pens and notebooks. Outside, depict the dwindling number of potential robbers, looking perplexed as they find fewer opportunities to engage in criminal activity with fewer authors present. Let the visual emphasize the cause-and-effect relationship between the authors leaving and the decrease in robberies, all with a comedic twist. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal a funny image you would see on reddit Cutsy graphics Glitch art a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of authors in Maine and Robberies, in the following situation: Because as the number of authors in Maine decreased, there were fewer "write" turns for potential robbers to take, leading to a decrease in robberies.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small room in Maine, the number of authors sitting at their desks steadily decreases. As they leave, their pens and notebooks sit untouched. Meanwhile, outside, the streets appear quieter as the number of robberies decreases. The potential robbers find fewer "write" turns to take with fewer authors around, leading to a decrease in criminal activity.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a small room in Maine, the number of authors sitting at their desks steadily decreases. As they leave, their pens and notebooks sit untouched. Meanwhile, outside, the streets appear quieter as the number of robberies decreases. The potential robbers find fewer "write" turns to take with fewer authors around, leading to a decrease in criminal activity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image representing a humorous scenario inspired by the decrease in criminal activity due to the dwindling number of authors in a small room in Maine. Capture the vibe of a bustling writing space with authors industriously working at their desks, deserting one by one, leaving their untouched pens and notebooks. Outside, depict the dwindling number of potential robbers, looking perplexed as they find fewer opportunities to engage in criminal activity with fewer authors present. Let the visual emphasize the cause-and-effect relationship between the authors leaving and the decrease in robberies, all with a comedic twist.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of authors in Maine caused Robberies to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association

The Journal of Literary Crime Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between social and economic variables has long been a subject of interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we delve into a rather uncommon connection - the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. Unearthing this curious correlation has provided us with an opportunity to weave together literature and crime in a way that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud. *Cue dad joke* It seems that in addition to writing mysteries, our authors are inadvertently becoming the protagonists in real-life capers.

The peculiar juxtaposition of literary productivity and criminal activity begs the question: What is the nature of this association, and how might it be explained? This paper aims to unravel this enigmatic entanglement by employing rigorous statistical analysis and drawing insights from the realms of sociology, criminology, and, of course, literature. It's almost as if Maine's authors are crafting more than just tales; they're also penning the script for statistical anomalies!

The idea of exploring the relationship between authors and robberies may at first appear whimsical, but our initial investigation has yielded compelling data. Our study spans the period from 2003 to 2022, drawing from meticulously collected information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It seems our research and the correlation coefficient are in cahoots, and honestly, we're just along for the sleuthing ride.

As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is essential to consider the potential implications of our findings. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly unrelated factors not only piques intellectual curiosity but also carries implications for public policy and social theory. Could it be that the pen truly is mightier than the sword, and in this case, mightier than the thief's tool as well? *Cue dad joke* Perhaps we should consider adding "author engagement" as a crime prevention strategy in addition to neighborhood watch programs.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between social and economic variables has long been a subject of interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we delve into a rather uncommon connection - the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. Unearthing this curious correlation has provided us with an opportunity to weave together literature and crime in a way that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud. *Cue dad joke* It seems that in addition to writing mysteries, our authors are inadvertently becoming the protagonists in real-life capers.
The peculiar juxtaposition of literary productivity and criminal activity begs the question: What is the nature of this association, and how might it be explained? This paper aims to unravel this enigmatic entanglement by employing rigorous statistical analysis and drawing insights from the realms of sociology, criminology, and, of course, literature. It's almost as if Maine's authors are crafting more than just tales; they're also penning the script for statistical anomalies!
The idea of exploring the relationship between authors and robberies may at first appear whimsical, but our initial investigation has yielded compelling data. Our study spans the period from 2003 to 2022, drawing from meticulously collected information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It seems our research and the correlation coefficient are in cahoots, and honestly, we're just along for the sleuthing ride.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is essential to consider the potential implications of our findings. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly unrelated factors not only piques intellectual curiosity but also carries implications for public policy and social theory. Could it be that the pen truly is mightier than the sword, and in this case, mightier than the thief's tool as well? *Cue dad joke* Perhaps we should consider adding "author engagement" as a crime prevention strategy in addition to neighborhood watch programs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has outlined a multitude of correlations between societal variables and criminal behavior. Smith et al. (2015) documented the impact of economic indicators on burglary rates, while Doe and Jones (2019) explored the relationship between educational attainment and larceny. However, the association between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has eluded scholarly inquiry until now. Our investigation aims to fill this gap in the literature and offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between creativity and criminality.

Speaking of fresh perspectives, the literature on this unconventional association is as diverse as a library's collection of books. In "The Economics of Crime," the authors delve into the economic and sociological factors influencing criminal behavior, but they forgot to include the chapter on "Crimes and Manuscripts." *Cue dad joke* It looks like they missed the opportunity for a real page-turner!

On the fictional front, works such as "The Burglar in the Library" and "The Mystery Writer Murders" seem pertinently related to our topic, at least in their titles. These books may not provide empirical evidence, but they certainly play into the whimsy of our investigation. *Cue dad joke* It seems even mystery novels can't resist the allure of Maine's literary and criminal connection.

In addition to academic literature, social media discussions have also shed light on this peculiar correlation. A tweet by @BookLover42 pondered, "Are Maine's crime rates being ghost-written by its authors? #ConspiracyOrCoincidence." While not a scholarly source, the contemplation of a potential literary conspiracy highlights the public intrigue surrounding our research. *Cue dad joke* Looks like our investigation is sparking more interest than a whodunit at a writers' convention!

Overall, the existing literature, both scholarly and fictional, provides the foundation for our comprehensive analysis of the link between the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. As we navigate this uncharted territory, our findings are poised to contribute a unique chapter to the book of criminological research. *Cue dad joke* It's clear that Maine's authors are leaving behind more than just novels; they're also penning a statistical mystery for us to solve!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between social and economic variables has long been a subject of interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we delve into a rather uncommon connection - the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. Unearthing this curious correlation has provided us with an opportunity to weave together literature and crime in a way that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud. *Cue dad joke* It seems that in addition to writing mysteries, our authors are inadvertently becoming the protagonists in real-life capers.
The peculiar juxtaposition of literary productivity and criminal activity begs the question: What is the nature of this association, and how might it be explained? This paper aims to unravel this enigmatic entanglement by employing rigorous statistical analysis and drawing insights from the realms of sociology, criminology, and, of course, literature. It's almost as if Maine's authors are crafting more than just tales; they're also penning the script for statistical anomalies!
The idea of exploring the relationship between authors and robberies may at first appear whimsical, but our initial investigation has yielded compelling data. Our study spans the period from 2003 to 2022, drawing from meticulously collected information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It seems our research and the correlation coefficient are in cahoots, and honestly, we're just along for the sleuthing ride.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is essential to consider the potential implications of our findings. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly unrelated factors not only piques intellectual curiosity but also carries implications for public policy and social theory. Could it be that the pen truly is mightier than the sword, and in this case, mightier than the thief's tool as well? *Cue dad joke* Perhaps we should consider adding "author engagement" as a crime prevention strategy in addition to neighborhood watch programs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the intriguing relationship between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies, an eclectic mix of research methods was employed to ensure a thorough and comprehensive analysis. Our first step in this intellectual escapade involved collecting data from a variety of sources, including the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It's almost as if we were conducting a literary heist, but instead of stealing words, we were mining numbers!

The data collection process spanned the time period from 2003 to 2022, allowing for a sufficiently robust temporal dimension to capture potential fluctuations in both the literary landscape and criminal activities. Utilizing advanced statistical techniques, we meticulously examined the census of authors in Maine and the reported incidents of robberies during the specified timeframe, aiming to uncover any noteworthy patterns or correlations that might be lurking beneath the surface. *Cue dad joke* We were essentially on the lookout for statistical capers that would make Agatha Christie proud!

Furthermore, to validate the veracity of our findings and ensure the statistical integrity of our analysis, we scrutinized the collected data through a series of rigorous tests. Employing correlation analysis, regression models, and other sophisticated statistical tools, we meticulously teased apart the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, unraveling their enigmatic interplay with precision. *Cue dad joke* It's safe to say that we were "detectives" in the statistical sense, on the lookout for any unexpected twists or suspicious discrepancies.

In addition to these methodologies, we also utilized advanced econometric methods to control for potential confounding variables and extraneous factors that may have inadvertently entered our statistical narrative. By incorporating robustness checks and sensitivity analyses, we sought to ensure that our findings remained resilient in the face of alternative specifications and nuances within the data. *Cue dad joke* It's not every day that researchers get to indulge in statistical sleuthing, but we were determined to make sure our results were as ironclad as a detective's alibi.

In sum, our research endeavors encompassed a blend of meticulous data collection, sophisticated statistical analyses, and eagle-eyed scrutiny of the findings. Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of intellectual curiosity, we set out on this statistical adventure, with the shared goal of unraveling the perplexing ties between the number of authors in Maine and the frequency of robberies. *Cue dad joke* It looks like we were not just cracking the statistical code; we were also uncovering a real literary "whodunit"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7779158, r-squared of 0.6051530, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between social and economic variables has long been a subject of interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we delve into a rather uncommon connection - the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. Unearthing this curious correlation has provided us with an opportunity to weave together literature and crime in a way that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud. *Cue dad joke* It seems that in addition to writing mysteries, our authors are inadvertently becoming the protagonists in real-life capers.
The peculiar juxtaposition of literary productivity and criminal activity begs the question: What is the nature of this association, and how might it be explained? This paper aims to unravel this enigmatic entanglement by employing rigorous statistical analysis and drawing insights from the realms of sociology, criminology, and, of course, literature. It's almost as if Maine's authors are crafting more than just tales; they're also penning the script for statistical anomalies!
The idea of exploring the relationship between authors and robberies may at first appear whimsical, but our initial investigation has yielded compelling data. Our study spans the period from 2003 to 2022, drawing from meticulously collected information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It seems our research and the correlation coefficient are in cahoots, and honestly, we're just along for the sleuthing ride.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is essential to consider the potential implications of our findings. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly unrelated factors not only piques intellectual curiosity but also carries implications for public policy and social theory. Could it be that the pen truly is mightier than the sword, and in this case, mightier than the thief's tool as well? *Cue dad joke* Perhaps we should consider adding "author engagement" as a crime prevention strategy in addition to neighborhood watch programs.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has produced intriguing results. Our research team found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7779158 between these seemingly disparate variables, indicating a robust positive association. This result suggests that as the number of authors in Maine increases, there is a corresponding increase in the incidence of robberies. The r-squared value of 0.6051530 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in robberies can be explained by the number of authors in the state. It's almost as if the increase in literary output is invoking an unintended "crime novel" set in the streets of Maine. *Cue dad joke* Who knew that writing thrillers could have such real-world implications?

The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the substantial nature of the relationship between the two variables, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no connection. This finding indicates that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by random chance and lends further credence to the unexpected and thought-provoking link between artistic creativity and criminal behavior. It's as though Maine's authors are inadvertently setting the stage for real-life escapades through their written words. *Cue dad joke* It's a real "whodunit" trying to figure out the root cause of this correlation!

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation identified in our analysis. The plot showcases a clear trend where increasing numbers of authors align closely with a rise in reported robberies, further solidifying the statistical evidence of this intriguing relationship. It seems that the written word may hold more power than we previously thought, both on the page and in the real world. *Cue dad joke* It appears that the pen really is "mightier" than just about anything, including inadvertently scripting a crime spree!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has outlined a multitude of correlations between societal variables and criminal behavior. Smith et al. (2015) documented the impact of economic indicators on burglary rates, while Doe and Jones (2019) explored the relationship between educational attainment and larceny. However, the association between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has eluded scholarly inquiry until now. Our investigation aims to fill this gap in the literature and offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between creativity and criminality.
Speaking of fresh perspectives, the literature on this unconventional association is as diverse as a library's collection of books. In "The Economics of Crime," the authors delve into the economic and sociological factors influencing criminal behavior, but they forgot to include the chapter on "Crimes and Manuscripts." *Cue dad joke* It looks like they missed the opportunity for a real page-turner!
On the fictional front, works such as "The Burglar in the Library" and "The Mystery Writer Murders" seem pertinently related to our topic, at least in their titles. These books may not provide empirical evidence, but they certainly play into the whimsy of our investigation. *Cue dad joke* It seems even mystery novels can't resist the allure of Maine's literary and criminal connection.
In addition to academic literature, social media discussions have also shed light on this peculiar correlation. A tweet by @BookLover42 pondered, "Are Maine's crime rates being ghost-written by its authors? #ConspiracyOrCoincidence." While not a scholarly source, the contemplation of a potential literary conspiracy highlights the public intrigue surrounding our research. *Cue dad joke* Looks like our investigation is sparking more interest than a whodunit at a writers' convention!
Overall, the existing literature, both scholarly and fictional, provides the foundation for our comprehensive analysis of the link between the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. As we navigate this uncharted territory, our findings are poised to contribute a unique chapter to the book of criminological research. *Cue dad joke* It's clear that Maine's authors are leaving behind more than just novels; they're also penning a statistical mystery for us to solve!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has produced intriguing results. Our research team found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7779158 between these seemingly disparate variables, indicating a robust positive association. This result suggests that as the number of authors in Maine increases, there is a corresponding increase in the incidence of robberies. The r-squared value of 0.6051530 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in robberies can be explained by the number of authors in the state. It's almost as if the increase in literary output is invoking an unintended "crime novel" set in the streets of Maine. *Cue dad joke* Who knew that writing thrillers could have such real-world implications?
The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the substantial nature of the relationship between the two variables, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no connection. This finding indicates that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by random chance and lends further credence to the unexpected and thought-provoking link between artistic creativity and criminal behavior. It's as though Maine's authors are inadvertently setting the stage for real-life escapades through their written words. *Cue dad joke* It's a real "whodunit" trying to figure out the root cause of this correlation!
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation identified in our analysis. The plot showcases a clear trend where increasing numbers of authors align closely with a rise in reported robberies, further solidifying the statistical evidence of this intriguing relationship. It seems that the written word may hold more power than we previously thought, both on the page and in the real world. *Cue dad joke* It appears that the pen really is "mightier" than just about anything, including inadvertently scripting a crime spree!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The striking correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has unfolded a truly unexpected narrative in our research endeavors. Our analysis has not only underscored a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables but has also sparked intriguing contemplation on the potential mechanisms underlying this unanticipated association.

Our findings resonate with previous research that has explored the influence of societal variables on criminal behavior. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2019) provided compelling evidence of the impact of economic and educational factors on crime rates, respectively. Strikingly, our results align with these prior studies, highlighting the intriguing interplay between creative expression and criminal activity. The strength of the correlation coefficient substantiates the growing body of literature that supports the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated societal variables. In this case, it seems that the pen truly has a significant impact on the criminal plotlines of the real world. *Cue dad joke* Who would have thought that Maine's authors are unwittingly writing themselves into a tale of crime and capers, leaving their mark on the state's criminal landscape in more ways than one?

In revisiting the lighthearted elements of the literature review, our own findings have lent an air of empirical weight to the seemingly fanciful musings. While social media discussions, such as the tweet by @BookLover42, initially presented the notion of a literary conspiracy in jest, our results offer a statistical foundation for such whimsical contemplations. It appears that the public's lighthearted conjectures may have more empirical support than initially assumed. *Cue dad joke* It seems even social media speculations can't resist the allure of a good statistical correlation, much like a whodunit suspense novel drawing in its readers.

Our robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value lend credibility to the notion that Maine's authors may indeed be inadvertently scripting a real-life plot twist through their literary works. The strong statistical evidence supports the contemplation of how creative output, as represented by the number of authors, may intersect with societal dynamics to influence criminal behavior. Thus, our findings serve as a nuanced addition to the literature on the intricate interplay between creativity, societal variables, and criminal activity. It appears that the authors of Maine are not just enriching the literary world but may also be inadvertently shaping the behavioral landscape of the state. *Cue dad joke* It's a real "cliffhanger" as to how this unexpected association will be perceived and understood in the broader academic and public discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of authors in Maine and Robberies. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between social and economic variables has long been a subject of interest for researchers across various disciplines. In this study, we delve into a rather uncommon connection - the number of authors in Maine and the occurrence of robberies. Unearthing this curious correlation has provided us with an opportunity to weave together literature and crime in a way that would make even Sherlock Holmes proud. *Cue dad joke* It seems that in addition to writing mysteries, our authors are inadvertently becoming the protagonists in real-life capers.
The peculiar juxtaposition of literary productivity and criminal activity begs the question: What is the nature of this association, and how might it be explained? This paper aims to unravel this enigmatic entanglement by employing rigorous statistical analysis and drawing insights from the realms of sociology, criminology, and, of course, literature. It's almost as if Maine's authors are crafting more than just tales; they're also penning the script for statistical anomalies!
The idea of exploring the relationship between authors and robberies may at first appear whimsical, but our initial investigation has yielded compelling data. Our study spans the period from 2003 to 2022, drawing from meticulously collected information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. *Cue dad joke* It seems our research and the correlation coefficient are in cahoots, and honestly, we're just along for the sleuthing ride.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is essential to consider the potential implications of our findings. The unexpected convergence of these seemingly unrelated factors not only piques intellectual curiosity but also carries implications for public policy and social theory. Could it be that the pen truly is mightier than the sword, and in this case, mightier than the thief's tool as well? *Cue dad joke* Perhaps we should consider adding "author engagement" as a crime prevention strategy in addition to neighborhood watch programs.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies has produced intriguing results. Our research team found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.7779158 between these seemingly disparate variables, indicating a robust positive association. This result suggests that as the number of authors in Maine increases, there is a corresponding increase in the incidence of robberies. The r-squared value of 0.6051530 confirms that a substantial proportion of the variability in robberies can be explained by the number of authors in the state. It's almost as if the increase in literary output is invoking an unintended "crime novel" set in the streets of Maine. *Cue dad joke* Who knew that writing thrillers could have such real-world implications?
The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the substantial nature of the relationship between the two variables, providing strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no connection. This finding indicates that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by random chance and lends further credence to the unexpected and thought-provoking link between artistic creativity and criminal behavior. It's as though Maine's authors are inadvertently setting the stage for real-life escapades through their written words. *Cue dad joke* It's a real "whodunit" trying to figure out the root cause of this correlation!
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the strong positive correlation identified in our analysis. The plot showcases a clear trend where increasing numbers of authors align closely with a rise in reported robberies, further solidifying the statistical evidence of this intriguing relationship. It seems that the written word may hold more power than we previously thought, both on the page and in the real world. *Cue dad joke* It appears that the pen really is "mightier" than just about anything, including inadvertently scripting a crime spree!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a compelling correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies, lending credence to the notion that the pen may indeed be mightier than the sword in unexpected ways. *Cue dad joke* Who would have thought that prolific writers could be unintentionally authoring crime sagas alongside their literary masterpieces? Our findings, encapsulated by a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158 and a p-value of < 0.01, provide robust evidence of this unlikely association and prompt us to consider the potential implications with a dash of humor and curiosity.

The statistical significance of our results suggests that as the literary output of Maine's authors increases, there is a corresponding rise in reported robberies. It's as if the captivating storytelling is spilling off the pages and into real-life events, creating unintentional crime narratives that even the most imaginative novelist might find surprising. *Cue dad joke* It seems our authors are not just spinning tales; they're also inadvertently crafting real-world capers.

This unforeseen nexus between literature and criminal activity raises thought-provoking questions about the societal impact of artistic creativity and prompts contemplation on potential strategies for crime prevention. Should law enforcement be on the lookout for increased book releases as a potential predictor of heightened criminal activity? *Cue dad joke* It appears that in Maine, when it rains, it pours – both in terms of literary fiction and crime reports.

While our study illuminates an intriguing connection, it also serves as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis and the unexpected findings that can emerge from rigorous inquiry. However, in the case of the correlation between the number of authors in Maine and robberies, it seems that no further research is needed. We've already penned the final chapter on this curious correlation. *Cue dad joke* It's time for us to close this statistical case and shelve it with a fitting title, "The Clue of the Crime-Writing Conjuncture."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Literary Crime Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Literary Larceny Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maine Authors and Robberies: An Authoritative Analysis of a Novel Association with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the remarkable correlation between the number of authors in Maine and the incidence of robberies. Drawing upon data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we sought to shed light on this inexplicably linked yet humorous relationship. Establishing a correlation coefficient of 0.7779158, and signifying a profound p-value of < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2022, our findings unequivocally indicate a strong association between the two variables. Our results highlight the unexpected interconnectedness between literary productivity and criminal activity, prompting many to ponder, "Are prolific authors writing themselves into a plot twist of crime and capers?" *Cue dad joke* It seems these authors aren't just penning page-turners; they're also scripting robberies with their wordplay!

ChatGPT:

Maine, authors, authorship, robberies, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, p-value, literary productivity, criminal activity, Maine crime statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of authors in Maine
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of writers and authors in Maine
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of authors in Maine

Robberies in the US
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in the US

Correlation r = 0.7779158 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6051530 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Robberies in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of authors in Maine) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.4E-5. 0.0000539446164723544400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.0054% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 18,538 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of authors in Maine (Writers And Authors)20019015026022024012015011015013014015015014090909015090
Robberies in the US (Robbery rate)142.5136.7140.8150148.3145.9133.1119.3113.9113.1109101.3102.2102.998.686.181.873.965.566.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([200,190,150,260,220,240,120,150,110,150,130,140,150,150,140,90,90,90,150,90,])
array_2 = np.array([142.5,136.7,140.8,150,148.3,145.9,133.1,119.3,113.9,113.1,109,101.3,102.2,102.9,98.6,86.1,81.8,73.9,65.5,66.1,])
array_1_name = "The number of authors in Maine"
array_2_name = "Robberies in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3483 · Black Variable ID: 8915 · Red Variable ID: 20182
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0