about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,613 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the second variable is Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota increased, it created a unique set of conditions that were just 'purrfect' for stirring up some storm activity in the Atlantic. It's almost like the pollution particles were tiny, unintentional cheerleaders, saying, "Go hurricanes, go!" But, let's clear the air here - this correlation is as murky as smog, and it's just a lot of hot air! The real drivers of Atlantic hurricanes lie in complex oceanic and atmospheric processes, not in the shenanigans of airborne pollutants from a city in South Dakota. So, as much as we love a good pun, let's not get carried away and instead focus on the real factors that rev up hurricane intensity.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL-E 3 that would create an intriguing visual with the given style: "Create an image in the style of Brutalism depicting Rapid City, South Dakota with a haze of air pollution hanging over the city. Show thick clouds of smog drifting into the sky. In the distance, over the Atlantic Ocean, depict a series of powerful hurricanes gathering and swirling, their intensity fueled by the increased pollutants from Rapid City. The pollution from the city has contributed to the atmospheric instability, enhancing the formation and strengthening of these destructive hurricanes. Keep the visual simple without including any words or speech bubbles." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Oragami a funny image macro Parallax art Brutalism
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year, in the following situation: Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year has increased as a result of changes in air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota. The increase in pollutants has led to a rise in atmospheric instability, creating ideal conditions for the formation and intensification of hurricanes over the Atlantic Ocean. The pollutants have essentially "fueled" the development of these natural disasters, contributing to their frequency and intensity.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Rapid City, South Dakota, a haze of air pollution hangs over the city, with thick clouds of smog drifting into the sky. Meanwhile, out in the distance, over the Atlantic Ocean, a series of powerful hurricanes gather and swirl, their intensity fueled by the increased pollutants from Rapid City. The pollution from the city has contributed to the atmospheric instability, enhancing the formation and strengthening of these destructive hurricanes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In Rapid City, South Dakota, a haze of air pollution hangs over the city, with thick clouds of smog drifting into the sky. Meanwhile, out in the distance, over the Atlantic Ocean, a series of powerful hurricanes gather and swirl, their intensity fueled by the increased pollutants from Rapid City. The pollution from the city has contributed to the atmospheric instability, enhancing the formation and strengthening of these destructive hurricanes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL-E 3 that would create an intriguing visual with the given style: "Create an image in the style of Brutalism depicting Rapid City, South Dakota with a haze of air pollution hanging over the city. Show thick clouds of smog drifting into the sky. In the distance, over the Atlantic Ocean, depict a series of powerful hurricanes gathering and swirling, their intensity fueled by the increased pollutants from Rapid City. The pollution from the city has contributed to the atmospheric instability, enhancing the formation and strengthening of these destructive hurricanes. Keep the visual simple without including any words or speech bubbles."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota positively influenced Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

The Journal of Atmospheric Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Air pollution and its far-reaching effects have long been a subject of interest and concern for researchers and policymakers. From the smog-covered skylines of bustling metropolises to the serene plains of the Great Plains, the impact of pollutants on weather patterns and climate phenomena continues to captivate the scientific community. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, embarking on a whimsical journey through the gusty winds of atmospheric science.

Known for its picturesque Black Hills, Rapid City also grapples with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The city's topography and unique meteorological conditions create an environment where particulate matter and other pollutants swirl and linger, forming a conspicuous cloak over the region. As such, our research team was drawn, not unlike moths to a flame, to investigate the potential implications of such atmospheric conditions on the tumultuous domain of Atlantic hurricanes.

Our experimental foray into this unlikely connection has yielded surprising findings – like a gust of wind catching an unsuspecting umbrella. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we uncovered a notable correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The winds of fate led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. These results, though initially unexpected, provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental science and meteorology.

In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our findings add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. This correlation, though seemingly as incongruous as a tornado in a teacup, raises fascinating questions about the interplay between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. As we unravel the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring this tempestuous relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.

So, prepare to be swept off your feet as we embark on a whirlwind adventure of scientific discovery, where the unexpected and the improbable often collide to reveal captivating insights into the complex dance of nature's forces. In the words of Shakespeare, "Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!" For we are about to embark on a journey through the winds and woes that link the quaint plains of Rapid City to the tempestuous swirl of Atlantic hurricanes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Air pollution and its far-reaching effects have long been a subject of interest and concern for researchers and policymakers. From the smog-covered skylines of bustling metropolises to the serene plains of the Great Plains, the impact of pollutants on weather patterns and climate phenomena continues to captivate the scientific community. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, embarking on a whimsical journey through the gusty winds of atmospheric science.
Known for its picturesque Black Hills, Rapid City also grapples with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The city's topography and unique meteorological conditions create an environment where particulate matter and other pollutants swirl and linger, forming a conspicuous cloak over the region. As such, our research team was drawn, not unlike moths to a flame, to investigate the potential implications of such atmospheric conditions on the tumultuous domain of Atlantic hurricanes.
Our experimental foray into this unlikely connection has yielded surprising findings – like a gust of wind catching an unsuspecting umbrella. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we uncovered a notable correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The winds of fate led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. These results, though initially unexpected, provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental science and meteorology.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our findings add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. This correlation, though seemingly as incongruous as a tornado in a teacup, raises fascinating questions about the interplay between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. As we unravel the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring this tempestuous relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.
So, prepare to be swept off your feet as we embark on a whirlwind adventure of scientific discovery, where the unexpected and the improbable often collide to reveal captivating insights into the complex dance of nature's forces. In the words of Shakespeare, "Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!" For we are about to embark on a journey through the winds and woes that link the quaint plains of Rapid City to the tempestuous swirl of Atlantic hurricanes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To uncover the gusty undercurrents of our research topic, our investigation begins with the scholarly works that have explored the interconnected domains of air pollution and meteorological phenomena. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of air pollutants on regional weather patterns, offering valuable insights into the complex interplay between atmospheric composition and climatic processes. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the far-reaching effects of air pollution on global weather systems, shedding light on the intricate web of interactions that shape our meteorological landscape.

Turning the page to non-fiction literature, "The Weather Makers" by Tim Flannery provides an in-depth exploration of environmental factors and their influence on weather patterns, offering a compelling backdrop against which to situate our research. Additionally, "The Perfect Storm" by Sebastian Junger presents a gripping account of the forces at play in the tempestuous world of natural disasters, although we admit our focus may be veering off course slightly.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "Storm Front" by Jim Butcher and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, though the latter being a tad more historical, offer engaging narratives with atmospheric themes that, in a curious way, pertain to the turbulent relationship between air pollution and Atlantic hurricanes.

However, in the spirit of thoroughness, we also dared to venture into uncharted territories for sources of insight. In a truly groundbreaking move, we consulted the backs of shampoo bottles, hoping to unlock the secrets of atmospheric correlation between the suds and the storm. Alas, the only revelation was an unexpected endorsement for "silky smooth hair in any weather – even a hurricane." While not the scholarly revelation we sought, it did provide a rather amusing detour in our academic expedition.

As our literature review twists and turns like a windblown leaf, it becomes evident that the interdisciplinary nature of our inquiry opens doors to unexpected encounters and whimsical detours. In the midst of these scholarly meanderings, we maintain our commitment to unraveling the enigmatic link between air pollution in Rapid City and the capricious nature of Atlantic hurricanes, even if it means breezing through unconventional sources of inspiration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Air pollution and its far-reaching effects have long been a subject of interest and concern for researchers and policymakers. From the smog-covered skylines of bustling metropolises to the serene plains of the Great Plains, the impact of pollutants on weather patterns and climate phenomena continues to captivate the scientific community. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, embarking on a whimsical journey through the gusty winds of atmospheric science.
Known for its picturesque Black Hills, Rapid City also grapples with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The city's topography and unique meteorological conditions create an environment where particulate matter and other pollutants swirl and linger, forming a conspicuous cloak over the region. As such, our research team was drawn, not unlike moths to a flame, to investigate the potential implications of such atmospheric conditions on the tumultuous domain of Atlantic hurricanes.
Our experimental foray into this unlikely connection has yielded surprising findings – like a gust of wind catching an unsuspecting umbrella. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we uncovered a notable correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The winds of fate led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. These results, though initially unexpected, provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental science and meteorology.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our findings add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. This correlation, though seemingly as incongruous as a tornado in a teacup, raises fascinating questions about the interplay between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. As we unravel the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring this tempestuous relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.
So, prepare to be swept off your feet as we embark on a whirlwind adventure of scientific discovery, where the unexpected and the improbable often collide to reveal captivating insights into the complex dance of nature's forces. In the words of Shakespeare, "Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!" For we are about to embark on a journey through the winds and woes that link the quaint plains of Rapid City to the tempestuous swirl of Atlantic hurricanes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the winds and woes of this curious correlation, we employed a convoluted, yet meticulously curated, methodological approach. Our research team embarked on an expedition through the labyrinthine landscape of data collection, statistical analysis, and meteorological musings.

1. Data Collection:
The data for air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, was gathered from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) database, embracing this repository of environmental information like a gust of fresh air. We also indulged in the veritable treasure trove of knowledge known as Wikipedia, extracting historical data on the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. To ensure the veracity of our findings, we meticulously cross-referenced the data from these disparate sources, navigating the digital seas as astutely as seasoned navigators plotting their course through stormy waters.

2. Data Preprocessing and Quality Control:
Before delving into the maelstrom of statistical analyses, our research team diligently scrubbed and tidied the data, akin to sweeping away the cobwebs of uncertainty. We screened the data to identify and rectify any anomalies or outliers, treating them with the same gravity as a storm chaser meticulously tracking a cyclone's erratic path.

3. Statistical Analysis:
With the data in shipshape, we buttressed our findings with a robust statistical foundation. To compute the correlation coefficient, we employed the Pearson product-moment correlation method, akin to putting the data through a rigorous atmospheric pressure test to gauge their interconnectedness. Additionally, we calculated the p-value to ascertain the statistical significance of the correlation, ensuring our results were as solid as a sturdy lighthouse weathering a tempest.

4. Sensitivity Analysis:
In recognition of the tempestuous nature of our subject matter, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our findings. This involved varying the parameters and thresholds used in the statistical analyses, akin to adjusting the sails of a ship to navigate the fickle winds of uncertainty.

5. Caveats and Limitations:
Lastly, we acknowledge the limitations of our study, recognizing that correlation does not imply causation. We tread carefully, akin to sailors navigating treacherous waters, and caution against attributing a direct cause-and-effect relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.

In effect, our research methodology, with its blend of meticulous data collection, rigorous statistical scrutiny, and cautious interpretation, stands as a testament to our commitment to unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. So, join us as we traverse the meandering pathways of scientific inquiry, braving the gusty winds and occasional gusts of humor that may unexpectedly crop up along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6316400, r-squared of 0.3989691, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Air pollution and its far-reaching effects have long been a subject of interest and concern for researchers and policymakers. From the smog-covered skylines of bustling metropolises to the serene plains of the Great Plains, the impact of pollutants on weather patterns and climate phenomena continues to captivate the scientific community. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, embarking on a whimsical journey through the gusty winds of atmospheric science.
Known for its picturesque Black Hills, Rapid City also grapples with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The city's topography and unique meteorological conditions create an environment where particulate matter and other pollutants swirl and linger, forming a conspicuous cloak over the region. As such, our research team was drawn, not unlike moths to a flame, to investigate the potential implications of such atmospheric conditions on the tumultuous domain of Atlantic hurricanes.
Our experimental foray into this unlikely connection has yielded surprising findings – like a gust of wind catching an unsuspecting umbrella. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we uncovered a notable correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The winds of fate led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. These results, though initially unexpected, provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental science and meteorology.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our findings add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. This correlation, though seemingly as incongruous as a tornado in a teacup, raises fascinating questions about the interplay between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. As we unravel the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring this tempestuous relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.
So, prepare to be swept off your feet as we embark on a whirlwind adventure of scientific discovery, where the unexpected and the improbable often collide to reveal captivating insights into the complex dance of nature's forces. In the words of Shakespeare, "Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!" For we are about to embark on a journey through the winds and woes that link the quaint plains of Rapid City to the tempestuous swirl of Atlantic hurricanes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed an intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and an R-squared value of 0.3989691 indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the robustness of this connection.

We present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The figure vividly illustrates the strong correlation, resembling the swirling maelstrom of data points caught in the tumultuous dance of atmospheric influence.

Our unexpected findings blow a breath of fresh air into the realm of environmental science and meteorology, providing new insights into the interdependent relationship between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. This correlation, though as unexpected as a downdraft of confetti in the eye of a storm, invites further investigation into the complex dynamics of atmospheric pollutants and their influence on tropical storms.

In summary, our study unravels an unforeseen connection between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes, challenging conventional wisdom and adding a gust of whimsy to the winding tale of weather and environmental factors. So batten down the hatches and prepare for an exhilarating journey through the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To uncover the gusty undercurrents of our research topic, our investigation begins with the scholarly works that have explored the interconnected domains of air pollution and meteorological phenomena. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of air pollutants on regional weather patterns, offering valuable insights into the complex interplay between atmospheric composition and climatic processes. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the far-reaching effects of air pollution on global weather systems, shedding light on the intricate web of interactions that shape our meteorological landscape.
Turning the page to non-fiction literature, "The Weather Makers" by Tim Flannery provides an in-depth exploration of environmental factors and their influence on weather patterns, offering a compelling backdrop against which to situate our research. Additionally, "The Perfect Storm" by Sebastian Junger presents a gripping account of the forces at play in the tempestuous world of natural disasters, although we admit our focus may be veering off course slightly.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "Storm Front" by Jim Butcher and "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell, though the latter being a tad more historical, offer engaging narratives with atmospheric themes that, in a curious way, pertain to the turbulent relationship between air pollution and Atlantic hurricanes.
However, in the spirit of thoroughness, we also dared to venture into uncharted territories for sources of insight. In a truly groundbreaking move, we consulted the backs of shampoo bottles, hoping to unlock the secrets of atmospheric correlation between the suds and the storm. Alas, the only revelation was an unexpected endorsement for "silky smooth hair in any weather – even a hurricane." While not the scholarly revelation we sought, it did provide a rather amusing detour in our academic expedition.
As our literature review twists and turns like a windblown leaf, it becomes evident that the interdisciplinary nature of our inquiry opens doors to unexpected encounters and whimsical detours. In the midst of these scholarly meanderings, we maintain our commitment to unraveling the enigmatic link between air pollution in Rapid City and the capricious nature of Atlantic hurricanes, even if it means breezing through unconventional sources of inspiration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed an intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and an R-squared value of 0.3989691 indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the robustness of this connection.
We present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The figure vividly illustrates the strong correlation, resembling the swirling maelstrom of data points caught in the tumultuous dance of atmospheric influence.
Our unexpected findings blow a breath of fresh air into the realm of environmental science and meteorology, providing new insights into the interdependent relationship between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. This correlation, though as unexpected as a downdraft of confetti in the eye of a storm, invites further investigation into the complex dynamics of atmospheric pollutants and their influence on tropical storms.
In summary, our study unravels an unforeseen connection between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes, challenging conventional wisdom and adding a gust of whimsy to the winding tale of weather and environmental factors. So batten down the hatches and prepare for an exhilarating journey through the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study not only reaffirm the compelling nature of the correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes but also provide a gust of whimsy to the wind of weather research. These findings add another twist to the atmospheric tale, like a sudden gust of puns in a storm. Our results align with the prior research, akin to a strong wind bending the trees in the same direction.

Although it may seem a tad windy, our literature review highlighted some unconventional sources that, despite their humorous overtone, added a breezy element to our understanding of the topic. For instance, our literature review playfully referenced the endorsement for "silky smooth hair in any weather – even a hurricane" found on the back of a shampoo bottle. Surprisingly, this detour served as a lighthearted reminder of the unpredictable twists and turns encountered in the pursuit of knowledge, akin to an unexpected gust turning an umbrella inside out.

Building on the scholarly insights of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), which backed up the idea that air pollution can influence weather, our study provides robust empirical evidence of the relationship between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. This correlation, though as surprising as a sneaky breeze lifting a hat from one's head, aligns with the prior literature's suggestion of the intricate web of interactions shaping our meteorological landscape.

In conclusion, the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes, like a sudden gust in the stillness of the air, surprises and delights with its potential implications for understanding the impact of localized atmospheric conditions on large-scale weather patterns. The winds of new beginnings beckon, and with further research, we aim to add another layer to this blustery tale of weather and environmental factors, blowing a breath of fresh air into the field of meteorological musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Air pollution and its far-reaching effects have long been a subject of interest and concern for researchers and policymakers. From the smog-covered skylines of bustling metropolises to the serene plains of the Great Plains, the impact of pollutants on weather patterns and climate phenomena continues to captivate the scientific community. In this study, we delve into the peculiar correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year, embarking on a whimsical journey through the gusty winds of atmospheric science.
Known for its picturesque Black Hills, Rapid City also grapples with its fair share of air pollution challenges. The city's topography and unique meteorological conditions create an environment where particulate matter and other pollutants swirl and linger, forming a conspicuous cloak over the region. As such, our research team was drawn, not unlike moths to a flame, to investigate the potential implications of such atmospheric conditions on the tumultuous domain of Atlantic hurricanes.
Our experimental foray into this unlikely connection has yielded surprising findings – like a gust of wind catching an unsuspecting umbrella. Through rigorous data analysis and statistical scrutiny, we uncovered a notable correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The winds of fate led us to a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2007 to 2022. These results, though initially unexpected, provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of environmental science and meteorology.
In the grand tapestry of scientific inquiry, our findings add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. This correlation, though seemingly as incongruous as a tornado in a teacup, raises fascinating questions about the interplay between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. As we unravel the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in exploring this tempestuous relationship between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes.
So, prepare to be swept off your feet as we embark on a whirlwind adventure of scientific discovery, where the unexpected and the improbable often collide to reveal captivating insights into the complex dance of nature's forces. In the words of Shakespeare, "Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage! Blow!" For we are about to embark on a journey through the winds and woes that link the quaint plains of Rapid City to the tempestuous swirl of Atlantic hurricanes.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data for the years 2007 to 2022 revealed an intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota, and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and an R-squared value of 0.3989691 indicated a moderate to strong positive relationship between the two variables. Additionally, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further underscored the robustness of this connection.
We present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicting the relationship between air pollution levels in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes. The figure vividly illustrates the strong correlation, resembling the swirling maelstrom of data points caught in the tumultuous dance of atmospheric influence.
Our unexpected findings blow a breath of fresh air into the realm of environmental science and meteorology, providing new insights into the interdependent relationship between localized atmospheric conditions and large-scale weather patterns. This correlation, though as unexpected as a downdraft of confetti in the eye of a storm, invites further investigation into the complex dynamics of atmospheric pollutants and their influence on tropical storms.
In summary, our study unravels an unforeseen connection between air pollution in Rapid City and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes, challenging conventional wisdom and adding a gust of whimsy to the winding tale of weather and environmental factors. So batten down the hatches and prepare for an exhilarating journey through the winds and woes of this meteorological conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

Our study has blown open a veritable vortex of revelations regarding the curious correlation between air pollution levels in the picturesque plains of Rapid City and the tempestuous twists of Atlantic hurricanes. The findings, like a sudden gust of wind on a tranquil day, have provided a breath of fresh air in the often-stale world of environmental science and meteorology.

The correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 have left us all in a whirl, much like a particularly blustery day in Rapid City. The winds of fate have indeed led us to a curious juncture where the swirling maelstrom of air pollutants seems to dance hand in hand with the tumultuous whirl of Atlantic hurricanes. It's as if our findings have unleashed a tropical storm of scientific curiosity and raised more questions than a conundrum caught in a cyclone.

So, let's not sidestep the pun-damental truth here – our research has set sail on uncharted waters, revealing an unexpected connection that has rocked the boat of established wisdom. Our unexpected findings, much like a sudden squall on a sunny day, have added a gust of whimsy to the rigid world of statistical analysis and environmental research.

In the grand voyage of scientific inquiry, we have stumbled upon a revelation that even the most seasoned meteorologist would find as unexpected as a surprise gust of wind on a still day. These findings are akin to a lighthearted breeze on a hot summer's day, breathing new life and unexpected excitement into the staid world of environmental research and meteorological musings.

In conclusion, our research has made waves in the scientific community, and much like a well-received joke at a dry academic conference, has injected an element of surprise and delight into the otherwise serious study of air pollution and Atlantic hurricanes. Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Atmospheric Anomalies and Ecological Enigmas (SAAEE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Whirlwind Woes: A Windy Tale of Air Pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota and the Tempestuous Relationship with Atlantic Hurricanes with an abstract of This paper explores the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Rapid City, South Dakota and the frequency of Atlantic hurricanes each year. The research team, amidst the dust and debris of data analysis, discovered a surprising correlation between the two factors. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, our study reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.6316400 and p < 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2022. The findings are a breath of fresh air in the field of environmental science and weather patterns, offering an unexpected twist to the ongoing tale of atmospheric influence on tropical storms. So, brace yourselves for a whirlwind of insights into the winds and woes of our meteorological musings!

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Rapid City, South Dakota, Atlantic hurricanes, environmental science, weather patterns, correlation coefficient, EPA data, hurricane frequency, atmospheric influence, tropical storms

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Rapid City, SD
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota

Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year
Detailed data title: Number of Atlantic Hurricanes in a Given Year
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year

Correlation r = 0.6316400 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3989691 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 39.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0087. 0.0086756967836864650000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.87% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 115 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.2, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota (Bad air quality days)0.005479450.002732240.01095890.0054794500.00819672000.01095890.002732240.01369860.005479450.01095890.005464480.03287670.00821918
Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year (Hurricanes)6831271026471086142114




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00547945,0.00273224,0.0109589,0.00547945,0,0.00819672,0,0,0.0109589,0.00273224,0.0136986,0.00547945,0.0109589,0.00546448,0.0328767,0.00821918,])
array_2 = np.array([6,8,3,12,7,10,2,6,4,7,10,8,6,14,21,14,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Rapid City, South Dakota"
array_2_name = "Number of Atlantic Hurricanes each year"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3613 · Black Variable ID: 21751 · Red Variable ID: 59
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0