about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,789 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Alabama and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Ecuador.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The extra-terrestrial visitors were huge fans of fossil fuels and couldn't resist stopping by Alabama for a fill-up, inadvertently creating a surge in UFO sightings. Little did they know, their love for fossil fuels would indirectly boost the demand for and consumption of Ecuador's own fossil fuels. It's a classic case of otherworldly influence on earthly practices, all thanks to some UFO pit stops in Alabama.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a surreal sci-fi fantasy world. In the foreground, depict a vast Alabama countryside at night, with a dark sky illuminated by countless stars. A glowing UFO hovers eerily over a field, as curious tourists gather around, gazing up in awe. In the background, capture the bustling streets of Ecuador, with cars and planes buzzing around fueled by fossil fuels. The scene should exude a sense of intergalactic excitement and wonder, contrasting the tranquil countryside with the frenetic energy of travel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Cutsy art illustration Photorealism Sci-fi fantacy Brutalism
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador, in the following situation: The increase in UFO sightings in Alabama led to a surge in alien tourism, causing more flights and thus increasing fossil fuel use in Ecuador to keep up with the demand for intergalactic travel. The extraterrestrials are really gassing up the economy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a dark, starry Alabama night sky with a glowing UFO hovering over a field, as curious tourists gather to catch a glimpse. Meanwhile, in the bustling streets of Ecuador, cars and planes fueled by fossil fuels are busily transporting excited travelers to and from the intergalactic excursion departure points, leaving trails of exhaust in their wake.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: Picture a dark, starry Alabama night sky with a glowing UFO hovering over a field, as curious tourists gather to catch a glimpse. Meanwhile, in the bustling streets of Ecuador, cars and planes fueled by fossil fuels are busily transporting excited travelers to and from the intergalactic excursion departure points, leaving trails of exhaust in their wake. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a surreal sci-fi fantasy world. In the foreground, depict a vast Alabama countryside at night, with a dark sky illuminated by countless stars. A glowing UFO hovers eerily over a field, as curious tourists gather around, gazing up in awe. In the background, capture the bustling streets of Ecuador, with cars and planes buzzing around fueled by fossil fuels. The scene should exude a sense of intergalactic excitement and wonder, contrasting the tranquil countryside with the frenetic energy of travel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in UFO sightings in Alabama positively influenced Fossil fuel use in Ecuador.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The peculiar intersection of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use has long been relegated to the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theories. However, the emergence of data-driven research has opened new possibilities for exploring such seemingly outlandish connections. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, seeking to unravel the perplexing correlation between these disparate phenomena.

At first glance, the notion of extraterrestrial visitations and earthly energy consumption may appear unlikely bedfellows. Yet, the underlying premise driving our investigation is that the universe operates on intricate and unfathomable principles – and perhaps there is a certain synergy between the otherworldly and the earthly that has eluded our understanding. As we occupy the vantage point of statistical analysis, it becomes apparent that the conventional boundaries of cause and effect may not suffice in encapsulating the intricacies of cosmic interactions.

The choice to focus on UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador stems from an earnest attempt to shed empirical light on what has, until now, languished in the twilight of conjecture. By gathering and scrutinizing data from seemingly unrelated realms, we endeavor to unearth hidden patterns and unveil the interstellar intrigue that permeates our planet's anthropogenic activities. Our pursuit is not a flight of fancy but rather a deliberate endeavor to elevate the discourse surrounding unconventional linkages and their implications for understanding the enigmatic nature of the universe.

As we embark on this academic odyssey, it is imperative to approach our findings with a discerning mind. The juxtaposition of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use may evoke amusement or skepticism, yet it is precisely through such unconventional juxtapositions that we may uncover profound insights. The thrust of our research is not to endorse outlandish theories, but to illuminate the uncharted territories where data-driven inquiry intersects with the mysterious and the unexpected.

Join us as we navigate the cosmic labyrinth of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, where statistical analysis meets the unexplained, and where the ordinary and the extraordinary converge in a dance of data and discovery. This inquiry, while seemingly whimsical in its premise, is underpinned by a commitment to rigorous analysis and an unwavering pursuit of truth – even if it means traversing the far reaches of the universe to find it.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The peculiar intersection of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use has long been relegated to the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theories. However, the emergence of data-driven research has opened new possibilities for exploring such seemingly outlandish connections. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, seeking to unravel the perplexing correlation between these disparate phenomena.
At first glance, the notion of extraterrestrial visitations and earthly energy consumption may appear unlikely bedfellows. Yet, the underlying premise driving our investigation is that the universe operates on intricate and unfathomable principles – and perhaps there is a certain synergy between the otherworldly and the earthly that has eluded our understanding. As we occupy the vantage point of statistical analysis, it becomes apparent that the conventional boundaries of cause and effect may not suffice in encapsulating the intricacies of cosmic interactions.
The choice to focus on UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador stems from an earnest attempt to shed empirical light on what has, until now, languished in the twilight of conjecture. By gathering and scrutinizing data from seemingly unrelated realms, we endeavor to unearth hidden patterns and unveil the interstellar intrigue that permeates our planet's anthropogenic activities. Our pursuit is not a flight of fancy but rather a deliberate endeavor to elevate the discourse surrounding unconventional linkages and their implications for understanding the enigmatic nature of the universe.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, it is imperative to approach our findings with a discerning mind. The juxtaposition of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use may evoke amusement or skepticism, yet it is precisely through such unconventional juxtapositions that we may uncover profound insights. The thrust of our research is not to endorse outlandish theories, but to illuminate the uncharted territories where data-driven inquiry intersects with the mysterious and the unexpected.
Join us as we navigate the cosmic labyrinth of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, where statistical analysis meets the unexplained, and where the ordinary and the extraordinary converge in a dance of data and discovery. This inquiry, while seemingly whimsical in its premise, is underpinned by a commitment to rigorous analysis and an unwavering pursuit of truth – even if it means traversing the far reaches of the universe to find it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Survey of Unconventional Correlations Between Extraterrestrial Phenomena and Earthly Activities," Smith et al. investigate the often-overlooked connections between celestial events and human enterprises. While the study primarily focuses on cosmic radiation and crop yield fluctuations, it offers a theoretical framework for probing the interplay of UFO sightings and resource utilization on Earth. The authors posit that the intricate dynamics of the universe may manifest in unexpected ways, prompting readers to contemplate the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate phenomena. Despite its serious tone, the study inadvertently sparks a comical thought about aliens cultivating alien crops for a cosmic harvest.

Doe and Jones, in "Astrological Anomalies and Earthly Emissions," expound upon the cosmically influenced perturbations that may reverberate through terrestrial domains. Their work intertwines the movements of celestial bodies with anthropogenic activities, presenting a multidimensional perspective on the interconnectedness of cosmic influences and human endeavors. Their findings shed light on the potential cosmic consequences of fossil fuel use, inviting readers to ponder the celestial significance of earthly emissions. One cannot help but imagine a grand cosmic jury scrutinizing our planet's carbon footprint.

As we peer into the realm of non-fiction books, "UFOs: Myths, Conspiracies, and Realities" by Jenny Randles and "Unacknowledged: An Exposé of the World's Greatest Secret" by Steven M. Greer beckon us with their tantalizing narratives of extraterrestrial encounters and government cover-ups. While these publications may seem tangential to our research focus, they subtly nudge us to contemplate the tantalizing prospect of clandestine cosmic forces influencing human affairs. It is as though these books are urging us to peer beyond the mundane and let our imaginations soar into the cosmic unknown.

On the fictional front, the works of H.G. Wells, particularly "The War of the Worlds" and "The First Men in the Moon," impart a whimsical yet thought-provoking exploration of alien visitations and their potential impact on human societies. Though these tales are woven from the fabric of imagination, they coax us to ponder the plausible ramifications of extraterrestrial incursions into our earthly realm. How amusing it is to consider the prospect of aliens arriving not for conquest, but to exchange fossil fuel consumption tips!

Further inspiration emerges from social media musings, where an individual cryptically professes, "Aliens are more interested in our carbon emissions than our civilization," prompting a chuckle at the intersection of cosmic curiosity and earthly concerns. Such enigmatic posts serve as humorous interludes that punctuate the gravity of our research pursuit, reminding us to embrace the unexpected even in the pursuit of scholarly inquiry.

In this whimsical voyage through literature and social discourse, we are nudged to confront the humor and absurdity intertwined with our study's serious underpinnings, presenting a delightfully unconventional lens through which to view the intriguing correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The peculiar intersection of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use has long been relegated to the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theories. However, the emergence of data-driven research has opened new possibilities for exploring such seemingly outlandish connections. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, seeking to unravel the perplexing correlation between these disparate phenomena.
At first glance, the notion of extraterrestrial visitations and earthly energy consumption may appear unlikely bedfellows. Yet, the underlying premise driving our investigation is that the universe operates on intricate and unfathomable principles – and perhaps there is a certain synergy between the otherworldly and the earthly that has eluded our understanding. As we occupy the vantage point of statistical analysis, it becomes apparent that the conventional boundaries of cause and effect may not suffice in encapsulating the intricacies of cosmic interactions.
The choice to focus on UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador stems from an earnest attempt to shed empirical light on what has, until now, languished in the twilight of conjecture. By gathering and scrutinizing data from seemingly unrelated realms, we endeavor to unearth hidden patterns and unveil the interstellar intrigue that permeates our planet's anthropogenic activities. Our pursuit is not a flight of fancy but rather a deliberate endeavor to elevate the discourse surrounding unconventional linkages and their implications for understanding the enigmatic nature of the universe.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, it is imperative to approach our findings with a discerning mind. The juxtaposition of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use may evoke amusement or skepticism, yet it is precisely through such unconventional juxtapositions that we may uncover profound insights. The thrust of our research is not to endorse outlandish theories, but to illuminate the uncharted territories where data-driven inquiry intersects with the mysterious and the unexpected.
Join us as we navigate the cosmic labyrinth of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, where statistical analysis meets the unexplained, and where the ordinary and the extraordinary converge in a dance of data and discovery. This inquiry, while seemingly whimsical in its premise, is underpinned by a commitment to rigorous analysis and an unwavering pursuit of truth – even if it means traversing the far reaches of the universe to find it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the celestial connections between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, our research employed a blend of quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The datasets were primarily sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, encompassing records spanning from 1980 to 2021. The following sections elucidate the convoluted yet insightful methods utilized in unraveling this cosmic conundrum.

### Data Collection and Preprocessing

The initial step of this galactic expedition involved combing through a plethora of UFO sighting reports in Alabama and meticulously gathering fossil fuel consumption statistics in Ecuador. We painstakingly curated this data out of necessity, not simply for the thrill of extraterrestrial escapades (although we must confess, there were moments of fascination gazing upon charts of UFO sightings). The data were then subjected to rigorous preprocessing procedures to ensure accuracy and compatibility across disparate datasets. Any anomalies or outliers were scrutinized with the diligence of a curious alien probing the Earth's mysteries.

### Statistical Analysis and Correlation Assessment

With a nod to the constellations, we set our sights on statistical analysis tools to unravel the cosmic dance between UFO sightings and fossil fuel use. A robust correlation analysis, including the Pearson correlation coefficient and p-values as dazzling as shooting stars, was conducted to discern the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. We navigated the nebulous terrain of significance testing, ardently seeking out patterns amidst the celestial noise, all the while aware of the inherent absurdity of our quest.

### Spatial and Temporal Considerations

Taking a cue from the universal clockwork, we strategically factored in spatial and temporal dimensions in our analysis. The geographical spread of UFO sightings and the temporal evolution of fossil fuel use were carefully weighed to encapsulate the cosmic tango that transcends earthly bounds. The interstellar rhythms governing the territorial expanse of our inquiry echo the unfathomable synchronicity of celestial motions, reminding us that our Earthly affairs are but a minuscule part of a grander cosmic spectacle.

### Sensitivity Analysis and Robustness Checks

With a nod to the extraterrestrial probing of our methodological choices, we conducted sensitivity analyses and robustness checks to fortify the veracity of our findings. We probed the boundaries of our models with a relentless curiosity, akin to a cosmic explorer seeking new frontiers amidst the unknown. Our inquiries into the robustness of our statistical models sought to provide the research voyagers of tomorrow with a sturdy vessel for navigating these uncharted territories.

### Qualitative Exploration of Anecdotal Evidence

In an endeavor to capture the whimsical and enigmatic nature of our investigation, we delved into the realm of qualitative exploration, where anecdotes and narratives of UFO encounters nestled alongside the solemn statistics of fossil fuel use. These narratives, much like shooting stars streaking across the cosmic canvas, added a touch of humanity to our ostensibly esoteric inquiry and reminded us of the profound human fascination with the mysterious and the inexplicable.

Despite the seemingly capricious nature of our exploration, we must assert with gravitas that every methodological choice was underpinned by an unwavering commitment to scholarly rigor and empirical curiosity. The following sections unfold the ascending arc of our findings, foregoing factual formulations disguised as facetious folds to shine a light on unprecedented cosmic correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8469715, r-squared of 0.7173607, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The peculiar intersection of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use has long been relegated to the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theories. However, the emergence of data-driven research has opened new possibilities for exploring such seemingly outlandish connections. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, seeking to unravel the perplexing correlation between these disparate phenomena.
At first glance, the notion of extraterrestrial visitations and earthly energy consumption may appear unlikely bedfellows. Yet, the underlying premise driving our investigation is that the universe operates on intricate and unfathomable principles – and perhaps there is a certain synergy between the otherworldly and the earthly that has eluded our understanding. As we occupy the vantage point of statistical analysis, it becomes apparent that the conventional boundaries of cause and effect may not suffice in encapsulating the intricacies of cosmic interactions.
The choice to focus on UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador stems from an earnest attempt to shed empirical light on what has, until now, languished in the twilight of conjecture. By gathering and scrutinizing data from seemingly unrelated realms, we endeavor to unearth hidden patterns and unveil the interstellar intrigue that permeates our planet's anthropogenic activities. Our pursuit is not a flight of fancy but rather a deliberate endeavor to elevate the discourse surrounding unconventional linkages and their implications for understanding the enigmatic nature of the universe.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, it is imperative to approach our findings with a discerning mind. The juxtaposition of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use may evoke amusement or skepticism, yet it is precisely through such unconventional juxtapositions that we may uncover profound insights. The thrust of our research is not to endorse outlandish theories, but to illuminate the uncharted territories where data-driven inquiry intersects with the mysterious and the unexpected.
Join us as we navigate the cosmic labyrinth of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, where statistical analysis meets the unexplained, and where the ordinary and the extraordinary converge in a dance of data and discovery. This inquiry, while seemingly whimsical in its premise, is underpinned by a commitment to rigorous analysis and an unwavering pursuit of truth – even if it means traversing the far reaches of the universe to find it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of our data set, which spans from 1980 to 2021, has unveiled a significant correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Specifically, the correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, our calculated r-squared value of 0.7173607 indicates that approximately 71.7% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Ecuador can be explained by the observed variation in UFO sightings in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing ample evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the notion of a tangible connection.

Upon visual inspection of the relationship between UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, our findings are encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot graphically portrays the conspicuous alignment between these variables, effectively encapsulating the harmonious dance of the extraterrestrial and the earthly on the canvas of statistical analysis.

While the correlation at hand may seem as bewildering as a close encounter with an unidentified flying object, our results stand as a testament to the unpredictability of the universe and the unforeseen relationships that underpin our daily existence. As we confront the implications of this unorthodox discovery, it is imperative to consider the broader implications that extend beyond the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. Our findings beckon us to explore avenues of thought that transcend the confines of our earthly perceptions and dare us to contemplate the cosmic interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use as a phenomenon that transcends the mundane.

In sum, the statistical evidence presented in this paper underscores the unlikely yet undeniably robust association between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. This insight opens new avenues for reflection and inquiry, challenging the scientific community to venture beyond the terra firma of conventional wisdom and embrace the enigmatic interplay of celestial events and terrestrial activities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Survey of Unconventional Correlations Between Extraterrestrial Phenomena and Earthly Activities," Smith et al. investigate the often-overlooked connections between celestial events and human enterprises. While the study primarily focuses on cosmic radiation and crop yield fluctuations, it offers a theoretical framework for probing the interplay of UFO sightings and resource utilization on Earth. The authors posit that the intricate dynamics of the universe may manifest in unexpected ways, prompting readers to contemplate the far-reaching implications of seemingly disparate phenomena. Despite its serious tone, the study inadvertently sparks a comical thought about aliens cultivating alien crops for a cosmic harvest.
Doe and Jones, in "Astrological Anomalies and Earthly Emissions," expound upon the cosmically influenced perturbations that may reverberate through terrestrial domains. Their work intertwines the movements of celestial bodies with anthropogenic activities, presenting a multidimensional perspective on the interconnectedness of cosmic influences and human endeavors. Their findings shed light on the potential cosmic consequences of fossil fuel use, inviting readers to ponder the celestial significance of earthly emissions. One cannot help but imagine a grand cosmic jury scrutinizing our planet's carbon footprint.
As we peer into the realm of non-fiction books, "UFOs: Myths, Conspiracies, and Realities" by Jenny Randles and "Unacknowledged: An Exposé of the World's Greatest Secret" by Steven M. Greer beckon us with their tantalizing narratives of extraterrestrial encounters and government cover-ups. While these publications may seem tangential to our research focus, they subtly nudge us to contemplate the tantalizing prospect of clandestine cosmic forces influencing human affairs. It is as though these books are urging us to peer beyond the mundane and let our imaginations soar into the cosmic unknown.
On the fictional front, the works of H.G. Wells, particularly "The War of the Worlds" and "The First Men in the Moon," impart a whimsical yet thought-provoking exploration of alien visitations and their potential impact on human societies. Though these tales are woven from the fabric of imagination, they coax us to ponder the plausible ramifications of extraterrestrial incursions into our earthly realm. How amusing it is to consider the prospect of aliens arriving not for conquest, but to exchange fossil fuel consumption tips!
Further inspiration emerges from social media musings, where an individual cryptically professes, "Aliens are more interested in our carbon emissions than our civilization," prompting a chuckle at the intersection of cosmic curiosity and earthly concerns. Such enigmatic posts serve as humorous interludes that punctuate the gravity of our research pursuit, reminding us to embrace the unexpected even in the pursuit of scholarly inquiry.
In this whimsical voyage through literature and social discourse, we are nudged to confront the humor and absurdity intertwined with our study's serious underpinnings, presenting a delightfully unconventional lens through which to view the intriguing correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data set, which spans from 1980 to 2021, has unveiled a significant correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Specifically, the correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, our calculated r-squared value of 0.7173607 indicates that approximately 71.7% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Ecuador can be explained by the observed variation in UFO sightings in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing ample evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the notion of a tangible connection.
Upon visual inspection of the relationship between UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, our findings are encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot graphically portrays the conspicuous alignment between these variables, effectively encapsulating the harmonious dance of the extraterrestrial and the earthly on the canvas of statistical analysis.
While the correlation at hand may seem as bewildering as a close encounter with an unidentified flying object, our results stand as a testament to the unpredictability of the universe and the unforeseen relationships that underpin our daily existence. As we confront the implications of this unorthodox discovery, it is imperative to consider the broader implications that extend beyond the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. Our findings beckon us to explore avenues of thought that transcend the confines of our earthly perceptions and dare us to contemplate the cosmic interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use as a phenomenon that transcends the mundane.
In sum, the statistical evidence presented in this paper underscores the unlikely yet undeniably robust association between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. This insight opens new avenues for reflection and inquiry, challenging the scientific community to venture beyond the terra firma of conventional wisdom and embrace the enigmatic interplay of celestial events and terrestrial activities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study illuminate a puzzling yet compelling connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Our results not only corroborate but also extend prior research that has hinted at the coalescence of seemingly disparate phenomena. Smith et al.'s investigation into unconventional correlations, while primarily focused on cosmic radiation and crop yield fluctuations, lays the groundwork for our exploration of the enigmatic interplay between celestial visitations and terrestrial resource consumption. At first glance, the notion of UFO sightings influencing fossil fuel use may seem as improbable as a spacecraft made of moon cheese, but our statistical analysis has lent empirical support to this unlikely association.

Doe and Jones' exposition on astrological anomalies and earthly emissions offers another intriguing precursor to our inquiry. Their multidimensional perspective on the interconnectedness of cosmic influences and human endeavors inadvertently foreshadows our investigation of the cosmic consequences of fossil fuel use. One cannot help but entertain the whimsical image of a grand cosmic jury scrutinizing our Earth's carbon footprint, akin to extraterrestrial auditors examining our planet's energy consumption reports.

Intriguingly, the whimsical tales woven by H.G. Wells in "The War of the Worlds" and "The First Men in the Moon" present thought-provoking narratives of alien visitations and their potential impact on human societies. While these works are born from the fabric of imagination, they coax us to ponder the plausible ramifications of extraterrestrial incursions into our earthly realm – a notion akin to aliens arriving not for conquest, but to exchange fossil fuel consumption tips, as comical as it may sound.

Our results, grounded in rigorous statistical analysis, have not only lent empirical validity to these unconventional associations but have also advanced our understanding of the interconnectedness of cosmic and earthly phenomena. The strong positive correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, as manifested by the notable correlation coefficient and r-squared value, invites us to contemplate the grand cosmic symphony playing out on the stage of our statistical analysis. This unlikely yet undeniably robust association challenges us to consider the broader implications that transcend the boundaries of our terrestrial understanding, urging us to confront the enigmatic interplay of celestial events and terrestrial activities with an open mind and a twinkle of cosmic curiosity.

As we navigate this whimsical yet scholarly voyage, we are reminded of the engaging discourse prompted by a cryptic social media post that humorously professes, "Aliens are more interested in our carbon emissions than our civilization." Such unexpected interludes, while lighthearted, serve as subtle reminders of the cosmic humor intertwined with the gravity of our research pursuit. It is with this spirit of intellectual curiosity and hidden witticism that we invite the scientific community to ponder the cosmic significance of our findings and to embrace the enigmatic interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use with both scholarly rigor and a dash of cosmic humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Alabama and Fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The peculiar intersection of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use has long been relegated to the realm of science fiction and conspiracy theories. However, the emergence of data-driven research has opened new possibilities for exploring such seemingly outlandish connections. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, seeking to unravel the perplexing correlation between these disparate phenomena.
At first glance, the notion of extraterrestrial visitations and earthly energy consumption may appear unlikely bedfellows. Yet, the underlying premise driving our investigation is that the universe operates on intricate and unfathomable principles – and perhaps there is a certain synergy between the otherworldly and the earthly that has eluded our understanding. As we occupy the vantage point of statistical analysis, it becomes apparent that the conventional boundaries of cause and effect may not suffice in encapsulating the intricacies of cosmic interactions.
The choice to focus on UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador stems from an earnest attempt to shed empirical light on what has, until now, languished in the twilight of conjecture. By gathering and scrutinizing data from seemingly unrelated realms, we endeavor to unearth hidden patterns and unveil the interstellar intrigue that permeates our planet's anthropogenic activities. Our pursuit is not a flight of fancy but rather a deliberate endeavor to elevate the discourse surrounding unconventional linkages and their implications for understanding the enigmatic nature of the universe.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, it is imperative to approach our findings with a discerning mind. The juxtaposition of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use may evoke amusement or skepticism, yet it is precisely through such unconventional juxtapositions that we may uncover profound insights. The thrust of our research is not to endorse outlandish theories, but to illuminate the uncharted territories where data-driven inquiry intersects with the mysterious and the unexpected.
Join us as we navigate the cosmic labyrinth of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, where statistical analysis meets the unexplained, and where the ordinary and the extraordinary converge in a dance of data and discovery. This inquiry, while seemingly whimsical in its premise, is underpinned by a commitment to rigorous analysis and an unwavering pursuit of truth – even if it means traversing the far reaches of the universe to find it.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data set, which spans from 1980 to 2021, has unveiled a significant correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Specifically, the correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Moreover, our calculated r-squared value of 0.7173607 indicates that approximately 71.7% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Ecuador can be explained by the observed variation in UFO sightings in Alabama. The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, providing ample evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the notion of a tangible connection.
Upon visual inspection of the relationship between UFO sightings and fossil fuel use, our findings are encapsulated in Figure 1. The scatterplot graphically portrays the conspicuous alignment between these variables, effectively encapsulating the harmonious dance of the extraterrestrial and the earthly on the canvas of statistical analysis.
While the correlation at hand may seem as bewildering as a close encounter with an unidentified flying object, our results stand as a testament to the unpredictability of the universe and the unforeseen relationships that underpin our daily existence. As we confront the implications of this unorthodox discovery, it is imperative to consider the broader implications that extend beyond the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. Our findings beckon us to explore avenues of thought that transcend the confines of our earthly perceptions and dare us to contemplate the cosmic interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use as a phenomenon that transcends the mundane.
In sum, the statistical evidence presented in this paper underscores the unlikely yet undeniably robust association between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. This insight opens new avenues for reflection and inquiry, challenging the scientific community to venture beyond the terra firma of conventional wisdom and embrace the enigmatic interplay of celestial events and terrestrial activities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a striking correlation between UFO sightings in Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador, shedding empirical light on a connection that transcends the conventional boundaries of cause and effect. The notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715, alongside a p-value less than 0.01, signifies a robust link between these seemingly unrelated variables, adding an intriguing layer of cosmic complexity to the realm of statistical analysis.

The discovery of this correlation may initially evoke a sense of disbelief akin to encountering an extraterrestrial visitor in one's backyard. However, as we navigate the celestial labyrinth of data and delve into the statistical cosmos, it becomes increasingly clear that the universe operates on a canvas of inscrutable interconnections.

While the synergy between extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption may appear as improbable as a cosmic coincidence, our findings defy scientific orthodoxy and beckon us to contemplate the uncharted territories where the enigmatic and the empirical converge. Indeed, the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization extend beyond the periphery of conventional understanding, inviting contemplation of a universe far more interconnected and interstellar than previously imagined.

As we gaze into the statistical constellations of our findings, we are compelled to acknowledge the limitations of our earthly perspectives and embrace the enigmatic interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use as an enlightening cosmic ballet. This revelatory insight challenges the scientific community to broaden its horizons and contemplate the cosmic interplay of events that transcend the mundane.

Thus, we assert that our research offers a thought-provoking contribution to the dialogue surrounding unconventional correlations, exemplifying the intriguing amalgamation of statistical rigor and cosmic curiosity. Our findings stand as a testament to the boundless frontiers of statistical inquiry and the unforeseen relationships that permeate our universe, prompting us to ponder the extensive ramifications of our terrestrial activities within the cosmic tapestry.

In light of this, we assert that no further research is warranted in this area, as our exploration has illuminated the celestial interplay of UFO sightings and fossil fuel use with unprecedented clarity. The enigmatic saga of UFOs and fossil fuels, it seems, requires no further investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Cosmic Energy Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled UFO or Fossil Fuels: Unveiling the Interstellar Link with an abstract of In this study, we explore the intriguing relationship between UFO sightings in the state of Alabama and fossil fuel use in Ecuador. Utilizing data sourced from the National UFO Reporting Center and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to dissect this unconventional correlation. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we have discovered a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8469715 and a p-value less than 0.01 when examining data from 1980 to 2021. Our findings offer an unprecedented insight into the interconnectedness of extraterrestrial phenomena and earthly energy consumption. This study challenges conventional wisdom and raises thought-provoking questions about the cosmic consequences of our planet's resource utilization. As we delve into the echoes of UFO sightings and carbon emissions, we invite readers to ponder the enigmatic interplay of UFOs and fossil fuels – a saga that extends beyond the boundaries of terrestrial understanding.

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings, fossil fuel consumption, Alabama, Ecuador, interstellar correlation, National UFO Reporting Center, Energy Information Administration, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, extraterrestrial phenomena, energy consumption, cosmic consequences, resource utilization, carbon emissions.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Alabama
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Alabama
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Alabama

Fossil fuel use in Ecuador
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Ecuador in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Ecuador

Correlation r = 0.8469715 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7173607 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Ecuador) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Alabama) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-12. 0.0000000000015523589016893133
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 1.6E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 644,180,929,366 random variables You don't actually need 644 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
UFO sightings in Alabama (UFO sightings)51004413210063977101630191218422740375148322641658112361466328545314
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador (Billion kWh)2.3082.7523.0142.4050.950.9450.9270.7710.7630.7691.2781.7822.0771.4981.5093.0722.8162.923.4422.9432.822823.740264.101224.10315.751865.297846.3916.6886.8738.5799.995968.58229.6923411.153111.612811.561110.8537.378128.008797.051986.362256.25116




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,1,0,0,4,4,1,3,2,1,0,0,6,3,9,7,7,10,16,30,19,12,18,42,27,40,37,51,48,32,26,41,65,81,123,61,46,63,28,54,53,14,])
array_2 = np.array([2.308,2.752,3.014,2.405,0.95,0.945,0.927,0.771,0.763,0.769,1.278,1.782,2.077,1.498,1.509,3.072,2.816,2.92,3.442,2.943,2.82282,3.74026,4.10122,4.1031,5.75186,5.29784,6.391,6.688,6.873,8.579,9.99596,8.5822,9.69234,11.1531,11.6128,11.5611,10.853,7.37812,8.00879,7.05198,6.36225,6.25116,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Alabama"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Ecuador"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 3789 · Black Variable ID: 1178 · Red Variable ID: 23639
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0