about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,093 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and the second variable is Google searches for 'snoop dog'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner, the local dogs no longer felt the need to snoop around for aromatic garbage, leading to a decrease in snoop dog activity.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of downtown Greenville, South Carolina, with a hazy skyline slowly clearing up to reveal a vibrant cityscape. Show a group of content local dogs lounging around in the cleaner environment, no longer searching for scraps. Meanwhile, include electronic devices displaying a decrease in Google searches for "snoop dog," reflecting the dogs' diminished interest in scavenging in the cleaner air. The overall scene should capture the positive impact of reduced air pollution on both the city and its canine residents. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image A Discovery magazine cover image Cybernetic art a funny image macro Art nouveau
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog', in the following situation: As the air became cleaner, the local dogs no longer felt the need to snoop around for aromatic garbage, leading to a decrease in snoop dog activity.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Greenville, South Carolina, the hazy air was slowly clearing up, and the skyline became more visible. As the air pollution decreased, the local dogs seemed content and no longer roamed around in search of aromatic garbage. Meanwhile, on people's electronic devices, the Google searches for "snoop dog" decreased as well, as the dogs were no longer inclined to snoop around for scraps in the cleaner environment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Greenville, South Carolina, the hazy air was slowly clearing up, and the skyline became more visible. As the air pollution decreased, the local dogs seemed content and no longer roamed around in search of aromatic garbage. Meanwhile, on people's electronic devices, the Google searches for "snoop dog" decreased as well, as the dogs were no longer inclined to snoop around for scraps in the cleaner environment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of downtown Greenville, South Carolina, with a hazy skyline slowly clearing up to reveal a vibrant cityscape. Show a group of content local dogs lounging around in the cleaner environment, no longer searching for scraps. Meanwhile, include electronic devices displaying a decrease in Google searches for "snoop dog," reflecting the dogs' diminished interest in scavenging in the cleaner air. The overall scene should capture the positive impact of reduced air pollution on both the city and its canine residents.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina caused snoop dog (Google searches for 'snoop dog') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering correlations and connections that defy logic and expectation. In the realm of environmental studies, the investigation of air pollution's impact on human health and behavior has been a longstanding endeavor. However, as researchers delved into the dataset pertaining to the air quality in Greenville, South Carolina, and the presence of a particular rap artist in the collective consciousness, an intriguing relationship emerged - one that is anything but "fo' shizzle."

The city of Greenville, nestled in the picturesque landscape of South Carolina, has grappled with air pollution levels stemming from a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and other less savory contributors to the atmospheric composition. Simultaneously, the enigmatic figure of Snoop Dogg, known for his lyrical prowess and unmistakable presence in the world of hip-hop, has continued to capture the public's attention throughout the years. These seemingly disparate elements converged in an unexpected manner, sparking curiosity and raising questions regarding the interplay of environmental factors and cultural phenomena.

As we embark on this exploration of the symbiotic dance between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg, it is crucial to approach the subject matter with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity. While the statistical analyses and quantitative assessments guide our inquiry, the underlying humor and oddity of this correlation remind us of the whimsical nature of the human experience. The juxtaposition of air quality measurements and Google search trends may seem incongruous, but as we shall uncover, the world of research is often rife with surprises, both scholarly and sardonic.

The aim of this study is to illuminate the peculiar bond between environmental conditions and online pursuits, offering a window into the intricacies of human behavior and interest. While the implications of this correlation remain to be fully comprehended, the journey toward unraveling this enigma promises to be a delightful odyssey through the realms of both science and entertainment. Join us as we venture into the uncharted territory where the aroma of air pollutants mingles with the allure of Snoop Dogg's virtual persona, creating a tapestry of intrigue that defies conventional explanation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering correlations and connections that defy logic and expectation. In the realm of environmental studies, the investigation of air pollution's impact on human health and behavior has been a longstanding endeavor. However, as researchers delved into the dataset pertaining to the air quality in Greenville, South Carolina, and the presence of a particular rap artist in the collective consciousness, an intriguing relationship emerged - one that is anything but "fo' shizzle."
The city of Greenville, nestled in the picturesque landscape of South Carolina, has grappled with air pollution levels stemming from a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and other less savory contributors to the atmospheric composition. Simultaneously, the enigmatic figure of Snoop Dogg, known for his lyrical prowess and unmistakable presence in the world of hip-hop, has continued to capture the public's attention throughout the years. These seemingly disparate elements converged in an unexpected manner, sparking curiosity and raising questions regarding the interplay of environmental factors and cultural phenomena.
As we embark on this exploration of the symbiotic dance between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg, it is crucial to approach the subject matter with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity. While the statistical analyses and quantitative assessments guide our inquiry, the underlying humor and oddity of this correlation remind us of the whimsical nature of the human experience. The juxtaposition of air quality measurements and Google search trends may seem incongruous, but as we shall uncover, the world of research is often rife with surprises, both scholarly and sardonic.
The aim of this study is to illuminate the peculiar bond between environmental conditions and online pursuits, offering a window into the intricacies of human behavior and interest. While the implications of this correlation remain to be fully comprehended, the journey toward unraveling this enigma promises to be a delightful odyssey through the realms of both science and entertainment. Join us as we venture into the uncharted territory where the aroma of air pollutants mingles with the allure of Snoop Dogg's virtual persona, creating a tapestry of intrigue that defies conventional explanation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has delved into the intricacies of air pollution and its potential impact on human behavior and cultural preferences. Smith and Jones (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban environments, demonstrating the adverse effects of particulate matter and airborne pollutants on the physiological well-being of inhabitants. Furthermore, Doe et al. (2018) explored the intersection of environmental factors and online search patterns, revealing fascinating correlations between local air pollution levels and the virtual queries of internet users. These foundational studies have provided a framework for understanding the potential relationships between air quality and human activities, laying the groundwork for the investigation at hand.

Moving beyond the realm of scholarly articles, the present inquiry draws inspiration from a diverse array of literature, both non-fiction and fiction, that touches upon the themes of air pollution, cultural phenomena, and unexpected connections. "The Air We Breathe: An Environmental History of Urban Landscapes" (Thompson, 2020) offers a nuanced examination of air quality fluctuations in metropolitan areas, shedding light on the societal responses to environmental challenges. In a more whimsical vein, "A Breath of Fresh Air: A Romantic Novel Set in a Polluted City" (Mills, 2017) presents a fictional narrative that intertwines the struggle for clean air with the complexities of human relationships, providing a fresh perspective on the interplay between environmental concerns and human experiences.

In the realm of popular fiction, the classic novel "Great Expectations" by Charles Dickens (1861) introduces readers to the foggy environs of Victorian London, evoking a sense of atmospheric intrigue that resonates with the nuances of air pollution. Similarly, the dystopian masterpiece "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley (1932) offers a speculative vision of a future society grappling with the consequences of industrialization, raising pertinent questions about the intersection of societal development and environmental degradation. These fictitious works, while seemingly removed from the specific context of Greenville, South Carolina, contribute to a broader tapestry of literary exploration, reminding us of the inextricable links between human creativity and environmental realities.

Drawing upon unexpected sources of inspiration, the authors also found resonance in the realm of board games that touch upon themes of environmental challenges and pop culture references. "Pollution Pandemonium: The Game of Environmental Dilemmas" and "Rap Rhythms: A Musical Quest for Victory" represent diverse strands of gaming entertainment, infusing elements of environmental awareness and musical motifs into interactive experiences. While these games may seem distant from the empirical analyses at hand, they underscore the diversity of mediums through which individuals engage with the themes of air pollution and cultural icons.

As the present study navigates the intersection of air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina, and the digital reverberations of Snoop Dogg's cultural presence, these multidisciplinary insights serve as a testament to the multifaceted dimensions of inquiry. The ensuing analysis will not only unravel the statistical associations but also pave the way for an exploration of the unexpected and eccentric within the framework of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering correlations and connections that defy logic and expectation. In the realm of environmental studies, the investigation of air pollution's impact on human health and behavior has been a longstanding endeavor. However, as researchers delved into the dataset pertaining to the air quality in Greenville, South Carolina, and the presence of a particular rap artist in the collective consciousness, an intriguing relationship emerged - one that is anything but "fo' shizzle."
The city of Greenville, nestled in the picturesque landscape of South Carolina, has grappled with air pollution levels stemming from a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and other less savory contributors to the atmospheric composition. Simultaneously, the enigmatic figure of Snoop Dogg, known for his lyrical prowess and unmistakable presence in the world of hip-hop, has continued to capture the public's attention throughout the years. These seemingly disparate elements converged in an unexpected manner, sparking curiosity and raising questions regarding the interplay of environmental factors and cultural phenomena.
As we embark on this exploration of the symbiotic dance between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg, it is crucial to approach the subject matter with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity. While the statistical analyses and quantitative assessments guide our inquiry, the underlying humor and oddity of this correlation remind us of the whimsical nature of the human experience. The juxtaposition of air quality measurements and Google search trends may seem incongruous, but as we shall uncover, the world of research is often rife with surprises, both scholarly and sardonic.
The aim of this study is to illuminate the peculiar bond between environmental conditions and online pursuits, offering a window into the intricacies of human behavior and interest. While the implications of this correlation remain to be fully comprehended, the journey toward unraveling this enigma promises to be a delightful odyssey through the realms of both science and entertainment. Join us as we venture into the uncharted territory where the aroma of air pollutants mingles with the allure of Snoop Dogg's virtual persona, creating a tapestry of intrigue that defies conventional explanation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The research employed a multifaceted approach to explore the relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the venerable rapper, Snoop Dogg. Data on air quality measurements, including particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide, was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System. The time span of the study encompassed the years 2004 to 2023, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of long-term trends in both air pollution and Snoop Dogg-related online activity.

To gauge public interest in Snoop Dogg, Google Trends data was utilized, capturing the relative search popularity of the artist over the specified time period. The search interest values were normalized to the peak search volume for the given time frame, enabling a comparative assessment of Snoop Dogg's virtual presence against the backdrop of evolving air pollution levels in Greenville.

In a rather unconventional turn of events, the research team also conducted a qualitative analysis of social media content, observing the frequency of Snoop Dogg references in online conversations related to environmental concerns. This qualitative approach provided anecdotal evidence of the rapper's ubiquitous presence in discussions on air quality, confirming the integration of pop culture and pollution in the digital sphere.

Statistical analyses, including Pearson correlation coefficients and time series modeling, were applied to elucidate the correlation between air pollution levels and Snoop Dogg search interest. Additionally, a hierarchical linear regression model was employed to control for potential confounding variables, such as seasonality and local events, which might influence both air quality and internet search behavior.

It is worth noting that the profusion of data sources and the interdisciplinary nature of the study allowed for a comprehensive examination of the curious nexus between environmental dynamics and online fascination. The convergence of environmental science, data analytics, and cultural studies unveiled a tapestry of associations that, much like a Snoop Dogg anthem, defied conventional boundaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9217283, r-squared of 0.8495831, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering correlations and connections that defy logic and expectation. In the realm of environmental studies, the investigation of air pollution's impact on human health and behavior has been a longstanding endeavor. However, as researchers delved into the dataset pertaining to the air quality in Greenville, South Carolina, and the presence of a particular rap artist in the collective consciousness, an intriguing relationship emerged - one that is anything but "fo' shizzle."
The city of Greenville, nestled in the picturesque landscape of South Carolina, has grappled with air pollution levels stemming from a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and other less savory contributors to the atmospheric composition. Simultaneously, the enigmatic figure of Snoop Dogg, known for his lyrical prowess and unmistakable presence in the world of hip-hop, has continued to capture the public's attention throughout the years. These seemingly disparate elements converged in an unexpected manner, sparking curiosity and raising questions regarding the interplay of environmental factors and cultural phenomena.
As we embark on this exploration of the symbiotic dance between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg, it is crucial to approach the subject matter with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity. While the statistical analyses and quantitative assessments guide our inquiry, the underlying humor and oddity of this correlation remind us of the whimsical nature of the human experience. The juxtaposition of air quality measurements and Google search trends may seem incongruous, but as we shall uncover, the world of research is often rife with surprises, both scholarly and sardonic.
The aim of this study is to illuminate the peculiar bond between environmental conditions and online pursuits, offering a window into the intricacies of human behavior and interest. While the implications of this correlation remain to be fully comprehended, the journey toward unraveling this enigma promises to be a delightful odyssey through the realms of both science and entertainment. Join us as we venture into the uncharted territory where the aroma of air pollutants mingles with the allure of Snoop Dogg's virtual persona, creating a tapestry of intrigue that defies conventional explanation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the volume of Google searches for the esteemed maestro of rap, Snoop Dogg. This coefficient, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8495831, provides compelling evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this connection, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the palpable association between air pollution and the frequency of searches for Snoop Dogg. The points on the graph coalesce into a discernible pattern, elucidating the consistent ebb and flow of Google queries in tandem with fluctuations in air quality. The conspicuous alignment of these data points serves as a tangible manifestation of the unanticipated interplay between environmental conditions and cultural intrigue.

The coherence of this correlation prompts contemplation on the mechanisms underlying such an unexpected concurrence. The surge in searches for Snoop Dogg may signify a perplexing response to elevated air pollution levels, where individuals turn to online diversions as a form of respite amidst deteriorating environmental conditions. Alternatively, this correlation may reflect a heightened awareness of environmental issues, prompting an uptick in searches for Snoop Dogg as a cultural touchstone in the face of ecological perturbations. However, the complexities of human behavior and the multifaceted influences on search trends warrant further exploration to unravel the nuanced dynamics at play.

This fortuitous confluence of environmental and cultural factors underscores the serendipitous nature of interdisciplinary research, where unexpected correlations materialize to unveil the whimsical idiosyncrasies of human experience. While the causal mechanisms underlying this relationship remain enigmatic, the emergent linkage between air pollution and the virtual pursuit of Snoop Dogg stands as a testament to the ineffable connections threaded through the fabric of societal phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has delved into the intricacies of air pollution and its potential impact on human behavior and cultural preferences. Smith and Jones (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban environments, demonstrating the adverse effects of particulate matter and airborne pollutants on the physiological well-being of inhabitants. Furthermore, Doe et al. (2018) explored the intersection of environmental factors and online search patterns, revealing fascinating correlations between local air pollution levels and the virtual queries of internet users. These foundational studies have provided a framework for understanding the potential relationships between air quality and human activities, laying the groundwork for the investigation at hand.
Moving beyond the realm of scholarly articles, the present inquiry draws inspiration from a diverse array of literature, both non-fiction and fiction, that touches upon the themes of air pollution, cultural phenomena, and unexpected connections. "The Air We Breathe: An Environmental History of Urban Landscapes" (Thompson, 2020) offers a nuanced examination of air quality fluctuations in metropolitan areas, shedding light on the societal responses to environmental challenges. In a more whimsical vein, "A Breath of Fresh Air: A Romantic Novel Set in a Polluted City" (Mills, 2017) presents a fictional narrative that intertwines the struggle for clean air with the complexities of human relationships, providing a fresh perspective on the interplay between environmental concerns and human experiences.
In the realm of popular fiction, the classic novel "Great Expectations" by Charles Dickens (1861) introduces readers to the foggy environs of Victorian London, evoking a sense of atmospheric intrigue that resonates with the nuances of air pollution. Similarly, the dystopian masterpiece "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley (1932) offers a speculative vision of a future society grappling with the consequences of industrialization, raising pertinent questions about the intersection of societal development and environmental degradation. These fictitious works, while seemingly removed from the specific context of Greenville, South Carolina, contribute to a broader tapestry of literary exploration, reminding us of the inextricable links between human creativity and environmental realities.
Drawing upon unexpected sources of inspiration, the authors also found resonance in the realm of board games that touch upon themes of environmental challenges and pop culture references. "Pollution Pandemonium: The Game of Environmental Dilemmas" and "Rap Rhythms: A Musical Quest for Victory" represent diverse strands of gaming entertainment, infusing elements of environmental awareness and musical motifs into interactive experiences. While these games may seem distant from the empirical analyses at hand, they underscore the diversity of mediums through which individuals engage with the themes of air pollution and cultural icons.
As the present study navigates the intersection of air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina, and the digital reverberations of Snoop Dogg's cultural presence, these multidisciplinary insights serve as a testament to the multifaceted dimensions of inquiry. The ensuing analysis will not only unravel the statistical associations but also pave the way for an exploration of the unexpected and eccentric within the framework of scholarly investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the volume of Google searches for the esteemed maestro of rap, Snoop Dogg. This coefficient, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8495831, provides compelling evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this connection, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the palpable association between air pollution and the frequency of searches for Snoop Dogg. The points on the graph coalesce into a discernible pattern, elucidating the consistent ebb and flow of Google queries in tandem with fluctuations in air quality. The conspicuous alignment of these data points serves as a tangible manifestation of the unanticipated interplay between environmental conditions and cultural intrigue.
The coherence of this correlation prompts contemplation on the mechanisms underlying such an unexpected concurrence. The surge in searches for Snoop Dogg may signify a perplexing response to elevated air pollution levels, where individuals turn to online diversions as a form of respite amidst deteriorating environmental conditions. Alternatively, this correlation may reflect a heightened awareness of environmental issues, prompting an uptick in searches for Snoop Dogg as a cultural touchstone in the face of ecological perturbations. However, the complexities of human behavior and the multifaceted influences on search trends warrant further exploration to unravel the nuanced dynamics at play.
This fortuitous confluence of environmental and cultural factors underscores the serendipitous nature of interdisciplinary research, where unexpected correlations materialize to unveil the whimsical idiosyncrasies of human experience. While the causal mechanisms underlying this relationship remain enigmatic, the emergent linkage between air pollution and the virtual pursuit of Snoop Dogg stands as a testament to the ineffable connections threaded through the fabric of societal phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have illuminated a highly significant correlation between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the renowned rap artist, Snoop Dogg. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and the considerably high r-squared value of 0.8495831 affirm a compelling connection between these seemingly divergent variables. Notably, this association aligns with previous research by Doe et al. (2018), who identified analogous links between environmental conditions and online search patterns. Consequently, the present study's results corroborate and extend the prior literature, underscoring the broader implications of environmental influences on cultural inquiry.

In a departure from conventional scholarly sources, our inquiry was inspired by a range of diverse cultural and imaginative works. The subtle resonance with the fog-enveloped landscapes of Victorian London in Charles Dickens' "Great Expectations" or the speculative vision of environmental degradation in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" may seem tangential, but they serve as poignant reminders of the pervasive impact of air pollution on human consciousness. Similarly, the playful integration of environmental dilemmas and musical motifs in board games underscores the multifaceted ways in which individuals engage with environmental and cultural themes. By embracing such unconventional sources of inspiration, this study has strived to capture the whimsical and unexpected facets of interdisciplinary investigation.

The unexpected connection between air pollution and public interest in Snoop Dogg not only emphasizes the complexity of human behavior but also highlights the unanticipated interplay between environmental variables and cultural phenomena. While traditional models of human behavior may not readily account for the surge in searches for Snoop Dogg in response to deteriorating air quality, the data incontrovertibly demonstrates the existence of this association. This quirk in the data distinctly captures the potential for serendipitous discoveries within the realm of scholarly inquiry, infusing a sense of humor and whimsy into the otherwise empirical domain of research.

Further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this correlation promises to unravel the nuanced dynamics at play. Whether the increased interest in Snoop Dogg serves as a form of escapism amidst environmental concerns or reflects a heightened environmental consciousness manifested in cultural expressions remains an open avenue for future investigation. Simultaneously, the unexpected concurrence of air pollution and musical inquiry challenges conventional paradigms, propelling the boundaries of scholarly inquiry into unanticipated territories.

In conclusion, this investigation into the interplay between air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina, and Google searches for Snoop Dogg underscores the vital import of considering unanticipated connections in scholarly endeavors. The study not only offers empirical evidence of a significant correlation but also beckons further scrutiny into the whimsical idiosyncrasies of human experience, transcending the conventional confines of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google searches for 'snoop dog'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge often leads researchers down unexpected paths, uncovering correlations and connections that defy logic and expectation. In the realm of environmental studies, the investigation of air pollution's impact on human health and behavior has been a longstanding endeavor. However, as researchers delved into the dataset pertaining to the air quality in Greenville, South Carolina, and the presence of a particular rap artist in the collective consciousness, an intriguing relationship emerged - one that is anything but "fo' shizzle."
The city of Greenville, nestled in the picturesque landscape of South Carolina, has grappled with air pollution levels stemming from a variety of sources, including industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and other less savory contributors to the atmospheric composition. Simultaneously, the enigmatic figure of Snoop Dogg, known for his lyrical prowess and unmistakable presence in the world of hip-hop, has continued to capture the public's attention throughout the years. These seemingly disparate elements converged in an unexpected manner, sparking curiosity and raising questions regarding the interplay of environmental factors and cultural phenomena.
As we embark on this exploration of the symbiotic dance between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg, it is crucial to approach the subject matter with a blend of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity. While the statistical analyses and quantitative assessments guide our inquiry, the underlying humor and oddity of this correlation remind us of the whimsical nature of the human experience. The juxtaposition of air quality measurements and Google search trends may seem incongruous, but as we shall uncover, the world of research is often rife with surprises, both scholarly and sardonic.
The aim of this study is to illuminate the peculiar bond between environmental conditions and online pursuits, offering a window into the intricacies of human behavior and interest. While the implications of this correlation remain to be fully comprehended, the journey toward unraveling this enigma promises to be a delightful odyssey through the realms of both science and entertainment. Join us as we venture into the uncharted territory where the aroma of air pollutants mingles with the allure of Snoop Dogg's virtual persona, creating a tapestry of intrigue that defies conventional explanation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the volume of Google searches for the esteemed maestro of rap, Snoop Dogg. This coefficient, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8495831, provides compelling evidence of a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforces the strength of this connection, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the palpable association between air pollution and the frequency of searches for Snoop Dogg. The points on the graph coalesce into a discernible pattern, elucidating the consistent ebb and flow of Google queries in tandem with fluctuations in air quality. The conspicuous alignment of these data points serves as a tangible manifestation of the unanticipated interplay between environmental conditions and cultural intrigue.
The coherence of this correlation prompts contemplation on the mechanisms underlying such an unexpected concurrence. The surge in searches for Snoop Dogg may signify a perplexing response to elevated air pollution levels, where individuals turn to online diversions as a form of respite amidst deteriorating environmental conditions. Alternatively, this correlation may reflect a heightened awareness of environmental issues, prompting an uptick in searches for Snoop Dogg as a cultural touchstone in the face of ecological perturbations. However, the complexities of human behavior and the multifaceted influences on search trends warrant further exploration to unravel the nuanced dynamics at play.
This fortuitous confluence of environmental and cultural factors underscores the serendipitous nature of interdisciplinary research, where unexpected correlations materialize to unveil the whimsical idiosyncrasies of human experience. While the causal mechanisms underlying this relationship remain enigmatic, the emergent linkage between air pollution and the virtual pursuit of Snoop Dogg stands as a testament to the ineffable connections threaded through the fabric of societal phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the remarkable correlation between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for Snoop Dogg has shed light on an intriguing interplay of environmental and cultural factors. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value point to a compelling association, tantalizing the academic palate with a curious fusion of atmospheric perturbations and online inquisitions. The somewhat unexpected nature of this correlation prompts reflection on the enigmatic twists and turns that research endeavors often unveil, adding an element of mirth to the pursuit of knowledge.

The data suggest a peculiar dance between the inhalation of pollutants and the exhalation of inquiries into the virtual realm of Snoop Dogg's domain. While the specific mechanisms underlying this correlation remain shrouded in mystery, the orchestrated symphony of air pollution levels and Google searches has introduced a comedic undertone to the confounding nature of scholarly discoveries. This unexpected juxtaposition serves as a poignant reminder that in the realm of research, as in life, sometimes the most incongruous pairings yield the most intriguing revelations.

As we strive to unravel the intricate web of human behavior, cultural phenomena, and environmental influences, the curious case of air pollution and searches for Snoop Dogg offers a delightful diversion from the usual scholarly pursuits. The statistical analyses have laid bare a connection that, while not inherently causal, speaks to the vibrant tapestry of human curiosity and the unpredictable manifestations of societal trends.

Ultimately, while the present study serves as a lighthearted exploration of an unexpected correlation, it bears testament to the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry. However, in the interest of maintaining academic decorum, it is imperative to acknowledge that no further research is needed in this area. The findings, while amusing and thought-provoking, do not warrant continued investigation into the quirks of search engine patterns and atmospheric compositions. This peculiar association between air pollution and the virtual quest for Snoop Dogg shall remain an enchanting outlier in the annals of research, a whimsical anomaly that captivated our scholarly musings for a fleeting yet delightful moment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Entanglements


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Environmental Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Dirty Air in the Chair: Air Pollution in Greenville, South Carolina and Google Searches for Snoop Dogg with an abstract of The present study investigates the perplexing relationship between air pollution levels in Greenville, South Carolina, and the frequency of Google searches for the iconic rap artist, Snoop Dogg. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.9217283 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were observed for the time period spanning from 2004 to 2023. The findings indicate a remarkable connection between the increase in air pollution and the curiosity about the notorious "Snoop D-o-double-g" in the airwaves of cyberspace. This unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the dynamics of public interest and environmental factors. While causation cannot be inferred from this association, it seems that when the air quality goes down, the searches for Snoop Dogg go up - a peculiar case of air pollution seemingly stimulating an uptick in musical inquiry. This quirk in the data brings forth a new appreciation for the unanticipated and humorous side of research in a world where the inexplicable can be discovered in the most unlikely places.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Greenville, South Carolina, Snoop Dogg, Google searches, correlation coefficient, Environmental Protection Agency, Google Trends, public interest, environmental factors, causation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina

Google searches for 'snoop dog'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'snoop dog'

Correlation r = 0.9217283 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8495831 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'snoop dog') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.9E-9. 0.0000000078626688537820300000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 7.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 127,183,278 random variables You don't actually need 127 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina (Bad air quality days)5.191269.589046.02746.02743.825140.2739733.287674.931511.36612000.5479451.91257000.2739730.2732240.27397300.732601
Google searches for 'snoop dog' (Rel. search volume)50.833367.916740.583338.532.916724.333321.2524.666717.7513.583317.517.916715.2511.259.416678.916679.416678.7513.333310.4444




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.19126,9.58904,6.0274,6.0274,3.82514,0.273973,3.28767,4.93151,1.36612,0,0,0.547945,1.91257,0,0,0.273973,0.273224,0.273973,0,0.732601,])
array_2 = np.array([50.8333,67.9167,40.5833,38.5,32.9167,24.3333,21.25,24.6667,17.75,13.5833,17.5,17.9167,15.25,11.25,9.41667,8.91667,9.41667,8.75,13.3333,10.4444,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Greenville, South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'snoop dog'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 4093 · Black Variable ID: 20696 · Red Variable ID: 1526
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0