about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,234 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jasper and the second variable is Wind power generated in France.  The chart goes from 1993 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Jaspers grew, so did the collective jaunty attitude, leading to an upsurge in spontaneous whistling. The melodious tunes created atmospheric disturbances, ultimately boosting wind power productivity in France. Remember, it's not the gusts of wind, it's the Jaspers that make the turbines spin!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an idyllic photo-realistic image of a picturesque French countryside, where a group of people named Jasper are gathered amidst a field of vibrant, colorful flowers and rolling green hills. The Jaspers are cheerfully whistling tunes, their joyous melodies reverberating through the air. Captivate the scene as winds respond to their melodies, swirling and dancing around the whistlers, creating a magical and enchanting ambiance. In the distance, rows of elegant wind turbines spin faster and more smoothly, harnessing the newfound energy created by the collective jaunty attitude of the Jaspers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art High-tech Parallax art Cyberpunk A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France, in the following situation: As the number of Jaspers grew, so did the collective jaunty attitude, leading to an upsurge in spontaneous whistling. The melodious tunes created atmospheric disturbances, ultimately boosting wind power productivity in France. Remember, it's not the gusts of wind, it's the Jaspers that make the turbines spin!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst a field of colorful flowers and rolling green hills in France, a group of people named Jasper gathered and began to cheerfully whistle tunes. As their joyful melodies filled the air, the winds seemed to respond, swirling and dancing around the whistlers. In the distance, rows of wind turbines spun faster and more smoothly, harnessing the newfound energy created by the collective jaunty attitude of the Jaspers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: Amidst a field of colorful flowers and rolling green hills in France, a group of people named Jasper gathered and began to cheerfully whistle tunes. As their joyful melodies filled the air, the winds seemed to respond, swirling and dancing around the whistlers. In the distance, rows of wind turbines spun faster and more smoothly, harnessing the newfound energy created by the collective jaunty attitude of the Jaspers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an idyllic photo-realistic image of a picturesque French countryside, where a group of people named Jasper are gathered amidst a field of vibrant, colorful flowers and rolling green hills. The Jaspers are cheerfully whistling tunes, their joyous melodies reverberating through the air. Captivate the scene as winds respond to their melodies, swirling and dancing around the whistlers, creating a magical and enchanting ambiance. In the distance, rows of elegant wind turbines spin faster and more smoothly, harnessing the newfound energy created by the collective jaunty attitude of the Jaspers.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Jasper caused Wind power generated in France to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

The Journal of Nameology and Climate Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The phenomenon of wind power generation has been a subject of extensive research in the field of renewable energy, with a focus on factors such as wind speed, turbine efficiency, and geographical location. However, in the spirit of exploring uncharted territory, this study delves into the unorthodox correlation between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. While this may seem like an unusual avenue of investigation, it presents an opportunity to unearth unexpected connections and perhaps even unveil the whimsical workings of the universe.

The name "Jasper," with its origins rooted in Old French and Persian, has enjoyed varied levels of popularity over the years. Its prevalence in certain time periods has been attributed to cultural trends, historical events, and even the influence of fictional characters. On the other hand, wind power, characterized by its renewable nature and ability to harness the kinetic energy of moving air, has increasingly become a focal point in the global pursuit of sustainable energy sources.

The convergence of these seemingly disparate elements begs the question: could there be a relationship between the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity and the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France? Our investigation aims to shed light on this curious correlation and provide a statistical basis for an otherwise enigmatic association.

Through meticulous data analysis and statistical modeling, we seek to discern whether the rise and fall of Jasper's popularity aligns with the ebbs and flows of wind power generation in France. This pursuit is underscored by the belief that empirical evidence, while often unexpected, can yield valuable insights – and perhaps unexpected chuckles – into the interconnectedness of societal trends and natural phenomena.

In the following sections, we will explore the methodological approach, data sources, and analytical techniques employed to uncover the potential link between the whims of baby naming practices and the gusts of wind propelling France's renewable energy landscape. Prepare to be blown away by the peculiar journey we are about to embark upon – a journey that promises to infuse statistical rigor with a hint of mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of wind power generation has been a subject of extensive research in the field of renewable energy, with a focus on factors such as wind speed, turbine efficiency, and geographical location. However, in the spirit of exploring uncharted territory, this study delves into the unorthodox correlation between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. While this may seem like an unusual avenue of investigation, it presents an opportunity to unearth unexpected connections and perhaps even unveil the whimsical workings of the universe.
The name "Jasper," with its origins rooted in Old French and Persian, has enjoyed varied levels of popularity over the years. Its prevalence in certain time periods has been attributed to cultural trends, historical events, and even the influence of fictional characters. On the other hand, wind power, characterized by its renewable nature and ability to harness the kinetic energy of moving air, has increasingly become a focal point in the global pursuit of sustainable energy sources.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate elements begs the question: could there be a relationship between the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity and the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France? Our investigation aims to shed light on this curious correlation and provide a statistical basis for an otherwise enigmatic association.
Through meticulous data analysis and statistical modeling, we seek to discern whether the rise and fall of Jasper's popularity aligns with the ebbs and flows of wind power generation in France. This pursuit is underscored by the belief that empirical evidence, while often unexpected, can yield valuable insights – and perhaps unexpected chuckles – into the interconnectedness of societal trends and natural phenomena.
In the following sections, we will explore the methodological approach, data sources, and analytical techniques employed to uncover the potential link between the whims of baby naming practices and the gusts of wind propelling France's renewable energy landscape. Prepare to be blown away by the peculiar journey we are about to embark upon – a journey that promises to infuse statistical rigor with a hint of mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The search for connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the scientific community, prompting researchers to embark on quests that often border on the whimsical. In the pursuit of uncovering the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and wind power generation in France, the authors have scoured a plethora of scholarly works and literary sources, delving into the depths of both factual and fictional realms.

Smith et al. (2010) conducted an extensive analysis of naming patterns and societal trends, laying the groundwork for understanding the societal implications of baby naming practices. Doe's (2015) comprehensive study on renewable energy sources provided valuable insight into the intricate dynamics of wind power generation, offering a solid foundation for exploring the potential interplay between renewable energy production and cultural phenomena.

Turning to the world of literature, "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "Zeitoun" by Dave Eggers offer poignant narratives that underscore the profound impact of names and cultural identities, hinting at the symbolic significance embedded within the choice of appellations. On a more whimsical note, "Jasper Jones" by Craig Silvey and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame beckon readers into fictional realms that teem with the allure of adventurous exploits and breezy escapades, lending a touch of whimsy to the exploration of interconnected themes.

In a bid to unravel the unconventional correlation at hand, the authors also indulged in an insightful exploration of visual media. The television shows "The Windy City Rehab" and "Breezy Living" provided an unconventional yet surprisingly delightful perspective on the potential influence of wind-inspired narratives on societal constructs, adding a lighthearted tint to the somber echoes of statistical analysis.

Indeed, as the academic pursuit unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that the journey to unravel the jocular relationship between the popularity of the name Jasper and the wind power generated in France is replete with unexpected surprises and whimsical tangents. With this foundation in place, the subsequent sections of this paper will endeavor to bring a gust of statistical rigor to the whimsical winds of inquiry, unearthing the potential link between the ebb and flow of Jasper's allure and the windswept landscapes of renewable energy generation in France.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1993 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The phenomenon of wind power generation has been a subject of extensive research in the field of renewable energy, with a focus on factors such as wind speed, turbine efficiency, and geographical location. However, in the spirit of exploring uncharted territory, this study delves into the unorthodox correlation between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. While this may seem like an unusual avenue of investigation, it presents an opportunity to unearth unexpected connections and perhaps even unveil the whimsical workings of the universe.
The name "Jasper," with its origins rooted in Old French and Persian, has enjoyed varied levels of popularity over the years. Its prevalence in certain time periods has been attributed to cultural trends, historical events, and even the influence of fictional characters. On the other hand, wind power, characterized by its renewable nature and ability to harness the kinetic energy of moving air, has increasingly become a focal point in the global pursuit of sustainable energy sources.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate elements begs the question: could there be a relationship between the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity and the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France? Our investigation aims to shed light on this curious correlation and provide a statistical basis for an otherwise enigmatic association.
Through meticulous data analysis and statistical modeling, we seek to discern whether the rise and fall of Jasper's popularity aligns with the ebbs and flows of wind power generation in France. This pursuit is underscored by the belief that empirical evidence, while often unexpected, can yield valuable insights – and perhaps unexpected chuckles – into the interconnectedness of societal trends and natural phenomena.
In the following sections, we will explore the methodological approach, data sources, and analytical techniques employed to uncover the potential link between the whims of baby naming practices and the gusts of wind propelling France's renewable energy landscape. Prepare to be blown away by the peculiar journey we are about to embark upon – a journey that promises to infuse statistical rigor with a hint of mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the enthralling connection between the popularity of the first name Jasper and wind power generated in France, our research team embarked on a methodological odyssey that combined meticulous data collection, thorough statistical analysis, and a dash of whimsy. Utilizing data spanning from 1993 to 2021, we employed a series of convoluted protocols that would intrigue even the most discerning aficionados of statistical tomfoolery.

Data Collection
The first phase of our methodology involved harvesting the popularity of the name Jasper from the treasure trove of information stored within the annals of the US Social Security Administration. This invaluable repository allowed us to trace the undulating waves of Jasper's prominence across time, providing a glimpse into the whims and fancies of baby naming practices.

Simultaneously, we delved into the depths of the Energy Information Administration’s data vaults to extract the wind power generation statistics in France. While traversing these digital catacombs, we encountered formidable challenges, including navigating through labyrinthine directories and evading the perils of erroneous data entry. After overcoming these hurdles, we emerged triumphant, clutching a trove of wind power production figures poised to reveal the potential correlations lurking within the tempestuous currents of data.

Data Processing
The assembly of this disparate array of data mandated a harmonious fusion of statistical tools and revelatory insights. Employing sophisticated software reminiscent of a virtuoso conductor orchestrating a symphony, we harmonized the temporal patterns of Jasper's popularity with the rhythmic undulations of wind power generation.

At this juncture, we implemented a series of obfuscating algorithms that danced with the artistry of a mischievous poltergeist, concealing the true nature of our conspiratorial intentions from the prying eyes of conventional analysis. With each enigmatic flourish, we sought to uncover the clandestine interplay between the ebb and flow of Jasper and the swirling tempests propelling wind turbines.

Statistical Analysis
Armed with our meticulously pruned dataset, we summoned the formidable spirits of statistical inference to scrutinize the potential relationship between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generated in France. Through an intricate pas de deux between regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and hypothesis testing, we sought to unmask the elusive connections pervading the fabric of our data.

Our statistical foray culminated in the revelation of a correlation coefficient tantamount to 0.9903895, accompanied by a p-value that shimmered beneath the hallowed threshold of 0.01. These prodigious findings furnished us with compelling evidence of a robust relationship between Jasper's resonance and the gusty ballet of wind power in France, sending ripples of bemusement through the hallowed halls of academia.

In the forthcoming sections, we shall delve into the riveting disclosure of our findings and offer whimsical musings on the implications of this unorthodox correlation. Prepare to be swept away by the gusts of statistical revelation – a tempestuous temerity that reveals the enigmatic entwining of namesake renown and the zephyrs of renewable energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1993 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9903895, r-squared of 0.9808713, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The phenomenon of wind power generation has been a subject of extensive research in the field of renewable energy, with a focus on factors such as wind speed, turbine efficiency, and geographical location. However, in the spirit of exploring uncharted territory, this study delves into the unorthodox correlation between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. While this may seem like an unusual avenue of investigation, it presents an opportunity to unearth unexpected connections and perhaps even unveil the whimsical workings of the universe.
The name "Jasper," with its origins rooted in Old French and Persian, has enjoyed varied levels of popularity over the years. Its prevalence in certain time periods has been attributed to cultural trends, historical events, and even the influence of fictional characters. On the other hand, wind power, characterized by its renewable nature and ability to harness the kinetic energy of moving air, has increasingly become a focal point in the global pursuit of sustainable energy sources.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate elements begs the question: could there be a relationship between the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity and the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France? Our investigation aims to shed light on this curious correlation and provide a statistical basis for an otherwise enigmatic association.
Through meticulous data analysis and statistical modeling, we seek to discern whether the rise and fall of Jasper's popularity aligns with the ebbs and flows of wind power generation in France. This pursuit is underscored by the belief that empirical evidence, while often unexpected, can yield valuable insights – and perhaps unexpected chuckles – into the interconnectedness of societal trends and natural phenomena.
In the following sections, we will explore the methodological approach, data sources, and analytical techniques employed to uncover the potential link between the whims of baby naming practices and the gusts of wind propelling France's renewable energy landscape. Prepare to be blown away by the peculiar journey we are about to embark upon – a journey that promises to infuse statistical rigor with a hint of mirth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the association between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France yielded intriguing results. Evidently, the correlation coefficient between the two variables was found to be 0.9903895, indicating a remarkably strong positive correlation. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.9808713, elucidating that approximately 98.08% of the variation in wind power generated in France can be explained by the popularity of the name Jasper. The p-value, which was less than 0.01, further substantiates the robustness of this observed relationship.

Notably, the statistical analysis revealed a nearly perfect alignment between the two phenomena, indicating that the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Jasper correspond harmoniously with the variation in wind power generation in France. To visually encapsulate this striking correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to showcase the strong linear relationship between the variables.

It is remarkable how the gusts of wind and the name Jasper seem to dance in unison, defying conventional logic and inspiring fascinating reflections on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated elements. This unexpected association between a baby name and renewable energy production piques curiosity and encourages a light-hearted appreciation for the serendipitous discoveries that statistical analyses can unveil.

The findings of this investigation not only provide empirical evidence of the peculiar link between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generation in France but also set the stage for further exploration into the whimsical interplay of societal trends and natural phenomena. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and as researchers, we are called to harness the power of statistical inquiry to unravel the unexpected while delighting in the subtle pun opportunities that present themselves along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The search for connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the scientific community, prompting researchers to embark on quests that often border on the whimsical. In the pursuit of uncovering the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and wind power generation in France, the authors have scoured a plethora of scholarly works and literary sources, delving into the depths of both factual and fictional realms.
Smith et al. (2010) conducted an extensive analysis of naming patterns and societal trends, laying the groundwork for understanding the societal implications of baby naming practices. Doe's (2015) comprehensive study on renewable energy sources provided valuable insight into the intricate dynamics of wind power generation, offering a solid foundation for exploring the potential interplay between renewable energy production and cultural phenomena.
Turning to the world of literature, "The Namesake" by Jhumpa Lahiri and "Zeitoun" by Dave Eggers offer poignant narratives that underscore the profound impact of names and cultural identities, hinting at the symbolic significance embedded within the choice of appellations. On a more whimsical note, "Jasper Jones" by Craig Silvey and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame beckon readers into fictional realms that teem with the allure of adventurous exploits and breezy escapades, lending a touch of whimsy to the exploration of interconnected themes.
In a bid to unravel the unconventional correlation at hand, the authors also indulged in an insightful exploration of visual media. The television shows "The Windy City Rehab" and "Breezy Living" provided an unconventional yet surprisingly delightful perspective on the potential influence of wind-inspired narratives on societal constructs, adding a lighthearted tint to the somber echoes of statistical analysis.
Indeed, as the academic pursuit unfolds, it becomes increasingly evident that the journey to unravel the jocular relationship between the popularity of the name Jasper and the wind power generated in France is replete with unexpected surprises and whimsical tangents. With this foundation in place, the subsequent sections of this paper will endeavor to bring a gust of statistical rigor to the whimsical winds of inquiry, unearthing the potential link between the ebb and flow of Jasper's allure and the windswept landscapes of renewable energy generation in France.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France yielded intriguing results. Evidently, the correlation coefficient between the two variables was found to be 0.9903895, indicating a remarkably strong positive correlation. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.9808713, elucidating that approximately 98.08% of the variation in wind power generated in France can be explained by the popularity of the name Jasper. The p-value, which was less than 0.01, further substantiates the robustness of this observed relationship.
Notably, the statistical analysis revealed a nearly perfect alignment between the two phenomena, indicating that the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Jasper correspond harmoniously with the variation in wind power generation in France. To visually encapsulate this striking correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to showcase the strong linear relationship between the variables.
It is remarkable how the gusts of wind and the name Jasper seem to dance in unison, defying conventional logic and inspiring fascinating reflections on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated elements. This unexpected association between a baby name and renewable energy production piques curiosity and encourages a light-hearted appreciation for the serendipitous discoveries that statistical analyses can unveil.
The findings of this investigation not only provide empirical evidence of the peculiar link between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generation in France but also set the stage for further exploration into the whimsical interplay of societal trends and natural phenomena. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and as researchers, we are called to harness the power of statistical inquiry to unravel the unexpected while delighting in the subtle pun opportunities that present themselves along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation evoke a kaleidoscope of whimsy and wonder, as we find ourselves swept up in the winds of statistical serendipity. Our endeavor to untangle the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and wind power generation in France has not only yielded a robust statistical correlation but has also unveiled an unexpected tapestry of interconnectedness. As we reflect upon the gusty dance of data points and ponder the breezy allure of the name Jasper, it becomes clear that this peculiar association transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, inviting us to embrace the delightful caprice of statistical exploration.

Building upon the foundation laid by prior research, our findings fortify the captivating notion that the ebb and flow of societal naming preferences is intertwined with the windswept landscapes of renewable energy generation. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 and the remarkably low p-value prompt us to gaze upon statistical significance with a whimsical twinkle in our eyes, recognizing the potential for unexpected discoveries even in the most unconventional of realms.

The winds of statistical inquiry have propelled us into uncharted territories, offering a refreshing breeze of levity and mirth amidst the rigors of academic pursuit. As we lean into the zephyrs of intellectual curiosity, we find ourselves embracing the lighthearted pun opportunities that arise from this unexpected correlation, acknowledging that statistical analyses can unfold with a playful wink and a nod to the unconventional.

Indeed, our findings not only bolster the prior literature's whispers of interconnectedness between naming practices and cultural phenomena but also beckon us to revel in the whimsical allure of statistical revelations. The scatterplot vividly illustrates the harmonious dance of the name Jasper and the windswept production of renewable energy, prompting us to appreciate the symphony of statistical patterns with a wry smile and a nod to the capricious nature of empirical inquiry.

In illuminating the unexpected yet robust relationship between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generation in France, our study stands as a testament to the delightful surprises that statistical analyses can unveil. The gusts of statistical significance and the breezy allure of the name Jasper intertwine to give rise to a lighthearted appreciation for the serendipitous discoveries that statistical exploration can offer. As we bid adieu to the discussion section, we are reminded of the whimsical potentials that lie at the intersection of seemingly disparate elements, inviting us to embrace the unanticipated revelations with a dose of scholarly mirth and an appreciation for the joyful dance of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jasper and Wind power generated in France. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The phenomenon of wind power generation has been a subject of extensive research in the field of renewable energy, with a focus on factors such as wind speed, turbine efficiency, and geographical location. However, in the spirit of exploring uncharted territory, this study delves into the unorthodox correlation between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. While this may seem like an unusual avenue of investigation, it presents an opportunity to unearth unexpected connections and perhaps even unveil the whimsical workings of the universe.
The name "Jasper," with its origins rooted in Old French and Persian, has enjoyed varied levels of popularity over the years. Its prevalence in certain time periods has been attributed to cultural trends, historical events, and even the influence of fictional characters. On the other hand, wind power, characterized by its renewable nature and ability to harness the kinetic energy of moving air, has increasingly become a focal point in the global pursuit of sustainable energy sources.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate elements begs the question: could there be a relationship between the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity and the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France? Our investigation aims to shed light on this curious correlation and provide a statistical basis for an otherwise enigmatic association.
Through meticulous data analysis and statistical modeling, we seek to discern whether the rise and fall of Jasper's popularity aligns with the ebbs and flows of wind power generation in France. This pursuit is underscored by the belief that empirical evidence, while often unexpected, can yield valuable insights – and perhaps unexpected chuckles – into the interconnectedness of societal trends and natural phenomena.
In the following sections, we will explore the methodological approach, data sources, and analytical techniques employed to uncover the potential link between the whims of baby naming practices and the gusts of wind propelling France's renewable energy landscape. Prepare to be blown away by the peculiar journey we are about to embark upon – a journey that promises to infuse statistical rigor with a hint of mirth.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France yielded intriguing results. Evidently, the correlation coefficient between the two variables was found to be 0.9903895, indicating a remarkably strong positive correlation. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) was calculated to be 0.9808713, elucidating that approximately 98.08% of the variation in wind power generated in France can be explained by the popularity of the name Jasper. The p-value, which was less than 0.01, further substantiates the robustness of this observed relationship.
Notably, the statistical analysis revealed a nearly perfect alignment between the two phenomena, indicating that the fluctuations in the popularity of the name Jasper correspond harmoniously with the variation in wind power generation in France. To visually encapsulate this striking correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to showcase the strong linear relationship between the variables.
It is remarkable how the gusts of wind and the name Jasper seem to dance in unison, defying conventional logic and inspiring fascinating reflections on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated elements. This unexpected association between a baby name and renewable energy production piques curiosity and encourages a light-hearted appreciation for the serendipitous discoveries that statistical analyses can unveil.
The findings of this investigation not only provide empirical evidence of the peculiar link between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generation in France but also set the stage for further exploration into the whimsical interplay of societal trends and natural phenomena. The winds of change indeed blow in mysterious ways, and as researchers, we are called to harness the power of statistical inquiry to unravel the unexpected while delighting in the subtle pun opportunities that present themselves along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study have brought to light a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the name Jasper and wind power generation in France, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 and a coefficient of determination of 0.9808713. It is clear from our analysis that the ebb and flow of Jasper's popularity aligns almost perfectly with the winds of change driving the production of wind power in France.

The unearthing of this unexpected relationship not only underscores the playful serendipity of statistical analyses but also opens doors for a plethora of pun opportunities. One might say that the winds of statistical significance have blown in our favor, revealing a breezy connection between baby-naming whims and renewable energy production.

While the implications of this correlation may seem whimsical, they prompt a lighthearted appreciation for the unpredictable interconnectedness of societal trends and natural forces. The unexpected alignment between the gusts of wind and the name Jasper serves as a delightful reminder of the enigmatic dance of statistical associations and the whimsical workings of the universe.

However, in the spirit of embracing the lighthearted nature of this investigation, it is important to recognize that the pursuit of puns and whimsy should not overshadow the empirical rigor of our findings. The statistical evidence presented here substantiates the robustness of the Jasper-wind power link, calling for continued exploration into the uncharted territories of unusual correlations.

In this vein, it must be acknowledged that while the correlation presented in this study is undeniably strong, further research in this area may be superfluous, as we have surely reached the breezy pinnacle of understanding the inexplicable connection between the name Jasper and wind power in France. As such, it is with a wry smile and a final whimsical pun that we assert: the wind of investigation in this area has been well and truly spent.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nameology and Climate Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Vortex Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowin' in the Jasper: A Breezy Investigation into the Jasper Name Popularity-Wind Power Link in France with an abstract of This study sets out to tackle the unconventional yet intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jasper and the wind power generated in France. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we scrutinized the time period spanning from 1993 to 2021. Our investigation yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9903895 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical relationship. Our findings suggest that the popularity of the name Jasper is curiously intertwined with the gusty production of wind power in France, opening up unexpected avenues for future research and pun opportunities.

ChatGPT:

Jasper, wind power, popularity, first name, France, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, name popularity, wind energy, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jasper
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jasper
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jasper

Wind power generated in France
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in France in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in France

Correlation r = 0.9903895 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9808713 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in France) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jasper) over the 29 years from 1993 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.7E-25. 0.0000000000000000000000009747
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 9.7E-23% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,025,956,704,627,064,655,839,232 random variables You don't actually need 1 septillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 28 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 28 because we have two variables measured over a period of 29 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.98, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Jasper (Babies born)238225261273295314305358415499487409472460610645976119412811381150717901908195221572551283727012950
Wind power generated in France (Billion kWh)0.0020.0050.0050.0070.0110.0190.0370.0480.1310.2650.3880.5950.9622.1824.075.6947.9129.94512.371615.178416.126717.323821.420621.38124.609428.598634.787439.791936.908




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([238,225,261,273,295,314,305,358,415,499,487,409,472,460,610,645,976,1194,1281,1381,1507,1790,1908,1952,2157,2551,2837,2701,2950,])
array_2 = np.array([0.002,0.005,0.005,0.007,0.011,0.019,0.037,0.048,0.131,0.265,0.388,0.595,0.962,2.182,4.07,5.694,7.912,9.945,12.3716,15.1784,16.1267,17.3238,21.4206,21.381,24.6094,28.5986,34.7874,39.7919,36.908,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jasper"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in France"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 4234 · Black Variable ID: 3353 · Red Variable ID: 23673
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0