about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,383 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to hide a body'.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Well, as Extra History delves into the strategies of ancient generals and the tactics of historical battles, it seems their catchy titles and thumbnails are inadvertently attracting a rather, uh, specialized audience. Who knew learning about the past could also help you plan for the future? Remember folks, always take historical advice with a grain of salt... or perhaps a whole bag if you're in the market for body-hiding tips!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic setting with holographic technology, showcasing a person interacting with a computer interface. The scene features a computer screen projecting a dynamic and vivid thumbnail for an Extra History video, revealing an intense illustration of ancient warfare. The title of the video, "Secrets of Ancient Generals Revealed! Tactics that Changed History!" stands out boldly. Below the screen, depict a person's hands hovering above a sleek and glowing keyboard, with "how to hide a body" being typed into the Google search bar. The setting should exude a sci-fi aesthetic, with subtle neon accents and advanced digital interfaces to set the scene in a futuristic realm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Brutalism inspired by bauhaus Sci-fi fantacy Concept art
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body', in the following situation: Well, as Extra History delves into the strategies of ancient generals and the tactics of historical battles, it seems their catchy titles and thumbnails are inadvertently attracting a rather, uh, specialized audience. Who knew learning about the past could also help you plan for the future? Remember folks, always take historical advice with a grain of salt... or perhaps a whole bag if you're in the market for body-hiding tips!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a computer screen displays a thumbnail for an Extra History video with a dramatic illustration of ancient warfare. The title reads, "Secrets of Ancient Generals Revealed! Tactics that Changed History!" Below the screen, someone types "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar, their fingers hovering over the keyboard as if seeking some less-than-historical advice.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a computer screen displays a thumbnail for an Extra History video with a dramatic illustration of ancient warfare. The title reads, "Secrets of Ancient Generals Revealed! Tactics that Changed History!" Below the screen, someone types "how to hide a body" into the Google search bar, their fingers hovering over the keyboard as if seeking some less-than-historical advice. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic setting with holographic technology, showcasing a person interacting with a computer interface. The scene features a computer screen projecting a dynamic and vivid thumbnail for an Extra History video, revealing an intense illustration of ancient warfare. The title of the video, "Secrets of Ancient Generals Revealed! Tactics that Changed History!" stands out boldly. Below the screen, depict a person's hands hovering above a sleek and glowing keyboard, with "how to hide a body" being typed into the Google search bar. The setting should exude a sci-fi aesthetic, with subtle neon accents and advanced digital interfaces to set the scene in a futuristic realm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are caused how to hide a body (Google searches for 'how to hide a body') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and How to Hide a Body Google Searches

The Journal of Internet Culture and Media Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

In the ever-evolving landscape of digital content, the allure of clickbait has become a force to be reckoned with. From enticing thumbnails to tantalizing titles, the art of clickbait has captivated audiences and researchers alike. As academics, we find ourselves drawn to the siren call of statistical analysis and unexpected correlations, leading to the unlikeliest of research endeavors. Thus, in this unconventional study, we sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the eyebrow-raising frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body."

Now, you might be thinking, "Why on earth would anyone delve into such an offbeat inquiry?" Well, dear reader, the world of academia is not without its surprises, and our inquisitive spirits impelled us to explore uncharted territories. After all, who wouldn't want to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the realms of historical storytelling and the peculiar curiosities of the online world?

By embracing the whimsical and the unexpected, we embarked on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious interplay between digital entertainment and the darker corners of human intrigue. Our journey led us through vast seas of data, where statistics and storytelling intertwined in a dance of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealing a narrative that was both perplexing and intriguing.

In this paper, we aim to shed light on the unconventional marriage of Extra History's clickbait prowess and the unsettling queries that populate the virtual realm. As we navigated through the currents of YouTube analytics and Google Trends, we unearthed a fascinating correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, accompanied by a p-value that was as elusive as a well-crafted clickbait title.

So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for we are about to plunge headfirst into the captivating world of clickbait, statistical serendipity, and the unforeseen bond between historical narratives and macabre Google searches. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in pondering the enigmatic forces at play and perhaps even share a chuckle at the whimsicality of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital content, the allure of clickbait has become a force to be reckoned with. From enticing thumbnails to tantalizing titles, the art of clickbait has captivated audiences and researchers alike. As academics, we find ourselves drawn to the siren call of statistical analysis and unexpected correlations, leading to the unlikeliest of research endeavors. Thus, in this unconventional study, we sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the eyebrow-raising frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body."
Now, you might be thinking, "Why on earth would anyone delve into such an offbeat inquiry?" Well, dear reader, the world of academia is not without its surprises, and our inquisitive spirits impelled us to explore uncharted territories. After all, who wouldn't want to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the realms of historical storytelling and the peculiar curiosities of the online world?
By embracing the whimsical and the unexpected, we embarked on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious interplay between digital entertainment and the darker corners of human intrigue. Our journey led us through vast seas of data, where statistics and storytelling intertwined in a dance of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealing a narrative that was both perplexing and intriguing.
In this paper, we aim to shed light on the unconventional marriage of Extra History's clickbait prowess and the unsettling queries that populate the virtual realm. As we navigated through the currents of YouTube analytics and Google Trends, we unearthed a fascinating correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, accompanied by a p-value that was as elusive as a well-crafted clickbait title.
So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for we are about to plunge headfirst into the captivating world of clickbait, statistical serendipity, and the unforeseen bond between historical narratives and macabre Google searches. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in pondering the enigmatic forces at play and perhaps even share a chuckle at the whimsicality of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between digital entertainment and internet search behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. From the impact of social media on consumer behavior to the psychology of online engagement, scholars have delved into the intricate web of human interaction with digital content. However, our current endeavor takes a rather unconventional turn as we delve into the realm of clickbait and its peculiar connection to Google searches for rather, ahem, unsettling inquiries.

In "Digital Engagement: Understanding Online User Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors explore the captivating allure of clickbait and its role in shaping user interactions with online content. Furthermore, Doe's "The Psychology of Digital Entertainment" provides insight into the intricacies of user engagement and the factors that drive individuals to click, view, and ultimately search for content on the internet. As we journey deeper into this unconventional study, these works serve as our foundational stepping stones, guiding us through a labyrinth of digital intrigue and academic fascination.

Now, while our pursuit may appear whimsical at first glance, it is worth noting the relevance of examining the unintended consequences of clickbait in the digital sphere. In "Hook, Line, and Click: The Impact of Clickbait in Online Media" by Jones, the author delves into the various dimensions of clickbait and its influence on user behavior. Little did Jones know that our research would venture into even more peculiar territory, unraveling a correlation that is as unexpected as stumbling upon a historical anomaly in the annals of time.

To add a humorous twist to our exploration, we draw inspiration from pop culture phenomena and imaginatively related works. "The Art of Misdirection: From Sleight of Hand to Click of Mouse" offers a whimsical take on the world of clickbait, drawing parallels between the craft of illusion and the art of online enticement. On a similar note, "The Curious Case of Clicks and Cadavers" presents a tongue-in-cheek analysis of the apparent bond between intriguing digital content and, well, the rather morbid curiosities of human nature.

As we take a light-hearted approach to our literature review, it's essential to recognize the influence of fiction on the human psyche. Books such as "Gone Girl" and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" may not directly relate to our study, but their themes of mystery and intrigue are certainly emblematic of the unexpected connections we often encounter in the realms of academia and digital exploration.

In a rather surprising turn of events, even board games such as Clue and Betrayal at House on the Hill piqued our interest, offering an amusing yet tangentially relevant perspective on the intertwining of historical storytelling and, well, let's just say, peculiar search queries.

With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of academic curiosity, we have embarked on a journey that transcends the ordinary boundaries of research. So, grab your magnifying glass and prepare to explore the uncharted territories of digital entertainment and macabre search trends, for the Clickbait Chronicles are about to unfold in all their whimsical glory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital content, the allure of clickbait has become a force to be reckoned with. From enticing thumbnails to tantalizing titles, the art of clickbait has captivated audiences and researchers alike. As academics, we find ourselves drawn to the siren call of statistical analysis and unexpected correlations, leading to the unlikeliest of research endeavors. Thus, in this unconventional study, we sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the eyebrow-raising frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body."
Now, you might be thinking, "Why on earth would anyone delve into such an offbeat inquiry?" Well, dear reader, the world of academia is not without its surprises, and our inquisitive spirits impelled us to explore uncharted territories. After all, who wouldn't want to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the realms of historical storytelling and the peculiar curiosities of the online world?
By embracing the whimsical and the unexpected, we embarked on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious interplay between digital entertainment and the darker corners of human intrigue. Our journey led us through vast seas of data, where statistics and storytelling intertwined in a dance of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealing a narrative that was both perplexing and intriguing.
In this paper, we aim to shed light on the unconventional marriage of Extra History's clickbait prowess and the unsettling queries that populate the virtual realm. As we navigated through the currents of YouTube analytics and Google Trends, we unearthed a fascinating correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, accompanied by a p-value that was as elusive as a well-crafted clickbait title.
So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for we are about to plunge headfirst into the captivating world of clickbait, statistical serendipity, and the unforeseen bond between historical narratives and macabre Google searches. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in pondering the enigmatic forces at play and perhaps even share a chuckle at the whimsicality of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

**Data Collection**
To embark on this offbeat yet intriguing investigation, we employed a multi-faceted approach to data collection. Our team of intrepid researchers scoured the digital expanse from 2012 to 2023, utilizing advanced AI analysis to decipher the enigmatic world of YouTube video titles and the peculiar realm of Google search trends related to clandestine inquiries.

With a mixture of scientific acumen and a healthy dose of curiosity, we ventured into the archives of Extra History's video repository, parsing through an extensive catalog of captivating titles that beckon viewers with promises of historical revelations. Simultaneously, we delved into the labyrinth of Google Trends, where queries related to the art of concealing, well, less-than-savory evidence, provided a telling insight into the darker corridors of online curiosity.

**Variable Selection**

In our quest for empirical enlightenment, we identified the key variables that would illuminate the potential correlation between clickbait-laden video titles and the search for tips on the discreet disposal of certain, shall we say, incriminating evidence. Our independent variable, the clickbait propensity of Extra History's video titles, was meticulously gauged based on an array of parameters, including keyword density, emotional appeal, and the artful employment of historical cliffhangers.

On the other hand, our dependent variable, the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body," presented a peculiar yet poignant reflection of an aspect of human curiosity that prudently lurks beneath the surface of polite society. As we grappled with the intricacies of these variables, we couldn't help but marvel at the sheer juxtaposition of highbrow historical narratives and, well, less-than-scholarly queries.

**Ethical Considerations**

In the pursuit of knowledge, ethics remain a steadfast guiding principle. Adhering to the highest standards of academic integrity, we approached this study with a keen awareness of the sensitivity surrounding the topic of online content and the exploration of, let's say, unconventional search patterns. Thus, we navigated the digital landscape with a conscientious regard for privacy and propriety, mindful of the potential implications of our findings.

**Statistical Analysis**

With our data in hand, we harnessed the formidable power of statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious dance between clickbait and clandestine inquiry. Employing correlation coefficients and p-values with the precision of a historical fencer, we embarked on a tango of data interpretation that would sway the skeptics and captivate the curious in equal measure.

Utilizing cutting-edge statistical software, we plumbed the depths of our dataset, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 with a p-value that sparked a fervent debate among our research team. The statistical significance of our findings, akin to an unexpected plot twist in an enthralling historical saga, demanded rigorous scrutiny and a touch of statistical whimsy.

**Limitations**

As with any intrepid expedition into uncharted realms, our study encountered its fair share of limitations. The inherently fluid nature of online content and search trends presented challenges in capturing the full spectrum of clickbait allure and, well, the less savory inquiries that drive internet traffic. Moreover, while our findings unveil a compelling correlation, we acknowledge the need for further research to delve into the underlying psychological and sociocultural factors at play.

In the spirit of scholarly humility, we recognize the boundaries of our exploration and invite future researchers to continue unraveling the enigmatic interplay between digital intrigue and the peculiar fascinations that define our online experiences.

So, with data in hand and curiosity as our trusty companion, we ventured forth into the uncharted waters of digital content and internet inquiries, paving the way for a peculiar yet profoundly engrossing journey of statistical serendipity and unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends .

For the time period 2012 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9015912, r-squared of 0.8128667, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital content, the allure of clickbait has become a force to be reckoned with. From enticing thumbnails to tantalizing titles, the art of clickbait has captivated audiences and researchers alike. As academics, we find ourselves drawn to the siren call of statistical analysis and unexpected correlations, leading to the unlikeliest of research endeavors. Thus, in this unconventional study, we sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the eyebrow-raising frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body."
Now, you might be thinking, "Why on earth would anyone delve into such an offbeat inquiry?" Well, dear reader, the world of academia is not without its surprises, and our inquisitive spirits impelled us to explore uncharted territories. After all, who wouldn't want to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the realms of historical storytelling and the peculiar curiosities of the online world?
By embracing the whimsical and the unexpected, we embarked on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious interplay between digital entertainment and the darker corners of human intrigue. Our journey led us through vast seas of data, where statistics and storytelling intertwined in a dance of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealing a narrative that was both perplexing and intriguing.
In this paper, we aim to shed light on the unconventional marriage of Extra History's clickbait prowess and the unsettling queries that populate the virtual realm. As we navigated through the currents of YouTube analytics and Google Trends, we unearthed a fascinating correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, accompanied by a p-value that was as elusive as a well-crafted clickbait title.
So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for we are about to plunge headfirst into the captivating world of clickbait, statistical serendipity, and the unforeseen bond between historical narratives and macabre Google searches. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in pondering the enigmatic forces at play and perhaps even share a chuckle at the whimsicality of scientific inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our unconventional inquiry into the connection between clickbait-infused Extra History YouTube video titles and the rather concerning Google searches for "how to hide a body" yielded some fascinating insights. As we navigated the choppy seas of data, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, indicating a striking relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8128667, further reinforcing the strength of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings refuse to be swept under the rug, demanding attention like a dramatic cliffhanger at the end of an Extra History episode.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 encapsulates the essence of this unexpected correlation with an elegance that could rival the most tantalizing of clickbait thumbnails. It portrays the undeniable link between the clickbait allure of historical narratives and the disconcerting allure of, well, less savory interests.

Like a twist in a riveting historical plot, our results challenge conventional expectations, showcasing the stranger-than-fiction nature of the digital world. One might even say that the allure of clickbait titles holds a kind of gravitational pull, much like a well-told historical tale, drawing in unsuspecting audiences and inadvertently sparking curiosity in the most peculiar of ways.

In essence, our findings highlight the quirkiness and complexity of human behavior as it intersects with online content. They serve as a reminder that behind every click, every search, and every statistical analysis, there lies a story waiting to be untangled, much like a historical mystery ripe for exploration.

So, dear reader, as we unravel this unorthodox connection, let us not only marvel at the statistical significance but also appreciate the whimsicality of our research journey. After all, in the realm of academia, even the most unconventional pairings can yield remarkably compelling results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between digital entertainment and internet search behavior has long been an area of interest for researchers across various disciplines. From the impact of social media on consumer behavior to the psychology of online engagement, scholars have delved into the intricate web of human interaction with digital content. However, our current endeavor takes a rather unconventional turn as we delve into the realm of clickbait and its peculiar connection to Google searches for rather, ahem, unsettling inquiries.
In "Digital Engagement: Understanding Online User Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors explore the captivating allure of clickbait and its role in shaping user interactions with online content. Furthermore, Doe's "The Psychology of Digital Entertainment" provides insight into the intricacies of user engagement and the factors that drive individuals to click, view, and ultimately search for content on the internet. As we journey deeper into this unconventional study, these works serve as our foundational stepping stones, guiding us through a labyrinth of digital intrigue and academic fascination.
Now, while our pursuit may appear whimsical at first glance, it is worth noting the relevance of examining the unintended consequences of clickbait in the digital sphere. In "Hook, Line, and Click: The Impact of Clickbait in Online Media" by Jones, the author delves into the various dimensions of clickbait and its influence on user behavior. Little did Jones know that our research would venture into even more peculiar territory, unraveling a correlation that is as unexpected as stumbling upon a historical anomaly in the annals of time.
To add a humorous twist to our exploration, we draw inspiration from pop culture phenomena and imaginatively related works. "The Art of Misdirection: From Sleight of Hand to Click of Mouse" offers a whimsical take on the world of clickbait, drawing parallels between the craft of illusion and the art of online enticement. On a similar note, "The Curious Case of Clicks and Cadavers" presents a tongue-in-cheek analysis of the apparent bond between intriguing digital content and, well, the rather morbid curiosities of human nature.
As we take a light-hearted approach to our literature review, it's essential to recognize the influence of fiction on the human psyche. Books such as "Gone Girl" and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" may not directly relate to our study, but their themes of mystery and intrigue are certainly emblematic of the unexpected connections we often encounter in the realms of academia and digital exploration.
In a rather surprising turn of events, even board games such as Clue and Betrayal at House on the Hill piqued our interest, offering an amusing yet tangentially relevant perspective on the intertwining of historical storytelling and, well, let's just say, peculiar search queries.
With a dash of humor and a sprinkle of academic curiosity, we have embarked on a journey that transcends the ordinary boundaries of research. So, grab your magnifying glass and prepare to explore the uncharted territories of digital entertainment and macabre search trends, for the Clickbait Chronicles are about to unfold in all their whimsical glory.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unconventional inquiry into the connection between clickbait-infused Extra History YouTube video titles and the rather concerning Google searches for "how to hide a body" yielded some fascinating insights. As we navigated the choppy seas of data, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, indicating a striking relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8128667, further reinforcing the strength of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings refuse to be swept under the rug, demanding attention like a dramatic cliffhanger at the end of an Extra History episode.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 encapsulates the essence of this unexpected correlation with an elegance that could rival the most tantalizing of clickbait thumbnails. It portrays the undeniable link between the clickbait allure of historical narratives and the disconcerting allure of, well, less savory interests.
Like a twist in a riveting historical plot, our results challenge conventional expectations, showcasing the stranger-than-fiction nature of the digital world. One might even say that the allure of clickbait titles holds a kind of gravitational pull, much like a well-told historical tale, drawing in unsuspecting audiences and inadvertently sparking curiosity in the most peculiar of ways.
In essence, our findings highlight the quirkiness and complexity of human behavior as it intersects with online content. They serve as a reminder that behind every click, every search, and every statistical analysis, there lies a story waiting to be untangled, much like a historical mystery ripe for exploration.
So, dear reader, as we unravel this unorthodox connection, let us not only marvel at the statistical significance but also appreciate the whimsicality of our research journey. After all, in the realm of academia, even the most unconventional pairings can yield remarkably compelling results.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In this unconventional and somewhat whimsical discussion, we aim to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden Extra History YouTube video titles and the rather disconcerting Google searches for "how to hide a body." Our findings have not only defied expectations but have also left us pondering the intricate web of digital engagement and its curious influence on human behavior.

Our results stand as a testament to the unexpected and often inexplicable patterns that manifest in the digital realm. Just as an illusory trick captivates an audience, our correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 has mesmerized us with its compelling evidence of a robust association between historical clickbait and, well, let's just say, less savory inquiries. It seems that the allure of captivating historical narratives has inadvertently sparked curiosity in the most unexpected of ways, much like stumbling upon an unexpected plot twist in the annals of time.

Building upon the foundation laid by our scholarly predecessors, our results echo the musings of Smith et al. and Doe, who delved into the captivating allure of online content and the intricate factors that shape digital engagement. While our pursuit may have started as an academic curiosity, it has evolved into a testament to the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences, reaffirming the relevance of examining the peculiar ramifications of digital enticement.

Amidst the statistical significance and the allure of our findings, it's essential to recognize the playful and humorous undertones that permeate our exploration. Just as "The Curious Case of Clicks and Cadavers" offered a tongue-in-cheek analysis of our study's apparent bond, our findings have embraced the whimsical spirit of uncovering unexpected correlations and weaving them into the tapestry of digital intrigue.

It's as if our research journey has unfolded like a narrative rife with unexpected plot twists, challenging conventional expectations and shedding light on the quirkiness of human behavior in the digital landscape. And much like the cliffhangers at the end of an Extra History episode, our results demand attention and leave us eagerly anticipating the next installment of this unconventional saga.

In the realm of academia, where the pursuit of knowledge often takes on a somber and serious demeanor, our findings serve as a delightful reminder that even the most unconventional pairings can yield remarkably compelling results. So, as we continue to unravel the mysteries of digital engagement and human curiosity, let us approach our research with a sense of whimsy and appreciation for the unexpected connections that await us in the digital age. After all, who knew that the allure of clickbait could lead us down such an intriguing - and slightly disconcerting - path?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and "How to Hide a Body" Google Searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.

With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital content, the allure of clickbait has become a force to be reckoned with. From enticing thumbnails to tantalizing titles, the art of clickbait has captivated audiences and researchers alike. As academics, we find ourselves drawn to the siren call of statistical analysis and unexpected correlations, leading to the unlikeliest of research endeavors. Thus, in this unconventional study, we sought to unravel the enigmatic connection between clickbait-laden titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the eyebrow-raising frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body."
Now, you might be thinking, "Why on earth would anyone delve into such an offbeat inquiry?" Well, dear reader, the world of academia is not without its surprises, and our inquisitive spirits impelled us to explore uncharted territories. After all, who wouldn't want to embark on a rollercoaster ride through the realms of historical storytelling and the peculiar curiosities of the online world?
By embracing the whimsical and the unexpected, we embarked on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious interplay between digital entertainment and the darker corners of human intrigue. Our journey led us through vast seas of data, where statistics and storytelling intertwined in a dance of correlation coefficients and p-values, revealing a narrative that was both perplexing and intriguing.
In this paper, we aim to shed light on the unconventional marriage of Extra History's clickbait prowess and the unsettling queries that populate the virtual realm. As we navigated through the currents of YouTube analytics and Google Trends, we unearthed a fascinating correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, accompanied by a p-value that was as elusive as a well-crafted clickbait title.
So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for we are about to plunge headfirst into the captivating world of clickbait, statistical serendipity, and the unforeseen bond between historical narratives and macabre Google searches. As we present our findings, we invite you to join us in pondering the enigmatic forces at play and perhaps even share a chuckle at the whimsicality of scientific inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unconventional inquiry into the connection between clickbait-infused Extra History YouTube video titles and the rather concerning Google searches for "how to hide a body" yielded some fascinating insights. As we navigated the choppy seas of data, we found a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9015912, indicating a striking relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8128667, further reinforcing the strength of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings refuse to be swept under the rug, demanding attention like a dramatic cliffhanger at the end of an Extra History episode.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 encapsulates the essence of this unexpected correlation with an elegance that could rival the most tantalizing of clickbait thumbnails. It portrays the undeniable link between the clickbait allure of historical narratives and the disconcerting allure of, well, less savory interests.
Like a twist in a riveting historical plot, our results challenge conventional expectations, showcasing the stranger-than-fiction nature of the digital world. One might even say that the allure of clickbait titles holds a kind of gravitational pull, much like a well-told historical tale, drawing in unsuspecting audiences and inadvertently sparking curiosity in the most peculiar of ways.
In essence, our findings highlight the quirkiness and complexity of human behavior as it intersects with online content. They serve as a reminder that behind every click, every search, and every statistical analysis, there lies a story waiting to be untangled, much like a historical mystery ripe for exploration.
So, dear reader, as we unravel this unorthodox connection, let us not only marvel at the statistical significance but also appreciate the whimsicality of our research journey. After all, in the realm of academia, even the most unconventional pairings can yield remarkably compelling results.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our expedition into the captivating world of clickbait and the clandestine universe of Google searches has unveiled a correlation that's as eyebrow-raising as a clickbait title screaming, "You won't believe what happened next!" The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and the elusive p-value have proven to be more entwined than a historical plot twist, leaving us pondering the mysterious dance of human intrigue and statistical significance.

Our findings not only highlight the power of clickbait to lure unsuspecting audiences but also hint at the enigmatic nature of human curiosity. It seems that the allure of a well-crafted historical narrative and the somewhat disconcerting allure of unconventional Google searches may be more intertwined than previously thought, akin to an unusual historical conspiracy waiting to be unraveled.

As we wrap up this whimsical journey, let's not only celebrate the statistical serendipity but also acknowledge the unexpected twists and turns that research can take. After all, in the world of academia, where the improbable meets the intriguing, no stone - or rather, no clickbait title - should be left unturned in pursuit of knowledge and a good chuckle.

Therefore, it is with utmost confidence that we assert: No further research is needed in this area. For now, let's bid adieu to the quirky world of clickbait and Google searches and venture forth, armed with the knowledge that even the most unusual pairings can yield statistically significant and amusing results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and How to Hide a Body Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Culture and Media Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and How to Hide a Body Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Digital Pop Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Clickbait Chronicles: A Correlational Study of Extra History YouTube Titles and How to Hide a Body Google Searches with an abstract of In this unconventional study, we delved into the realm of digital entertainment and criminal curiosity to explore the potential link between clickbait-y YouTube video titles from the popular Extra History channel and the frequency of Google searches for "how to hide a body." While this may sound like an unusual pairing, our findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation that cannot be easily dismissed. Utilizing data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9015912 and p < 0.01 over the period from 2012 to 2023.
With a mixture of amusement and academic rigor, we waded through the realm of intriguing historical narratives and the slightly disconcerting search history of internet users. Our research sheds light on the interconnectedness of online content and human curiosity, as well as the captivating power of clickbait and its unintended consequences. This study serves as a reminder that even in the world of academia, one can stumble upon unexpected and whimsical connections - or perhaps uncover a darker side of online engagement. So, grab your thinking caps and buckle up for a journey through the bizarre and the thought-provoking in the digital age.

ChatGPT:

Extra History, YouTube titles, clickbait, Google searches, how to hide a body, correlation study, digital entertainment, online content, human curiosity, internet users, Google Trends, AI analysis, academic study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are

Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to hide a body'

Correlation r = 0.9015912 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8128667 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to hide a body') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are) over the 12 years from 2012 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.1E-5. 0.0000614928572519529100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.0061% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 16,262 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are (Clickbait-y score)2.85372.75933.27783.30882.67192.77872.67072.81523.13993.22483.15333.5036
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Rel. search volume)51.416754.08338370.583343.666738.7536.416741.333356.583375.2572.2575.4444




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.8537,2.7593,3.2778,3.3088,2.6719,2.7787,2.6707,2.8152,3.1399,3.2248,3.1533,3.5036,])
array_2 = np.array([51.4167,54.0833,83,70.5833,43.6667,38.75,36.4167,41.3333,56.5833,75.25,72.25,75.4444,])
array_1_name = "How clickbait-y Extra History YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to hide a body'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4383 · Black Variable ID: 25784 · Red Variable ID: 1513
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0