about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,417 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa and the second variable is The number of butchers in Iowa.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Perhaps the Senators were known for their strong opinions on meat production, leading to a political beef that ultimately led to a shortage of butchers!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that appears to be a scene from 'Star Wars', featuring a bustling downtown Iowa. A line of Republican voters stretches around the block, eagerly casting their votes for Senators as stormtroopers stand guard nearby. In the background, a row of vacant butcher shops with "Help Wanted" signs displayed in their windows contrasts with the political fervor. Amidst the chaos, a crowd has gathered outside the remaining open butcher shop, with customers lining up to purchase meat before it sells out. The clash of political opinions on meat production is evident in the scene, where the shortage of skilled butchers has sparked a heated debate. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Oragami Cutsy art illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Concept art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa, in the following situation: Perhaps the Senators were known for their strong opinions on meat production, leading to a political beef that ultimately led to a shortage of butchers!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In downtown Iowa, a line of Republican voters stretches around the block, eagerly casting their votes for Senators. Meanwhile, a row of butcher shops sit empty, their "Help Wanted" signs hanging in the windows. The shortage of butchers has caused a frenzy, with people lining up to buy meat before it sells out. The clash of political opinions on meat production has sparked a heated debate, leaving Iowa with a scarcity of skilled workers to meet the demand for butchery.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In downtown Iowa, a line of Republican voters stretches around the block, eagerly casting their votes for Senators. Meanwhile, a row of butcher shops sit empty, their "Help Wanted" signs hanging in the windows. The shortage of butchers has caused a frenzy, with people lining up to buy meat before it sells out. The clash of political opinions on meat production has sparked a heated debate, leaving Iowa with a scarcity of skilled workers to meet the demand for butchery. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that appears to be a scene from 'Star Wars', featuring a bustling downtown Iowa. A line of Republican voters stretches around the block, eagerly casting their votes for Senators as stormtroopers stand guard nearby. In the background, a row of vacant butcher shops with "Help Wanted" signs displayed in their windows contrasts with the political fervor. Amidst the chaos, a crowd has gathered outside the remaining open butcher shop, with customers lining up to purchase meat before it sells out. The clash of political opinions on meat production is evident in the scene, where the shortage of skilled butchers has sparked a heated debate.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa caused The number of butchers in Iowa to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

The Journal of Political Butchery

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Politics and meat - two essential components of human society, each with its own unique flavor. As the saying goes, "Where's the beef?" Well, in this case, it seems to be in the voting booths of Iowa. This study seeks to uncover the intriguing relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. To paraphrase a classic, it's time to put on our statistical apron and start slicing through the data to reveal the meaty truth behind this curious association.

First things first, though. Why did the butcher become a Republican? Because he wanted to bring home the bacon, of course! Now that we've gotten that out of our system, let's delve into the heart of the matter (pun intended).

Upon conducting our analysis and crunching the numbers with the precision of a skilled chef, we discovered a strong correlation between the surge in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the rise in the number of butchers across the state. It's almost as if the aroma of sizzling steaks was compelling voters to lean in a particular political direction. One does wonder if political platforms should start including "grill rights" in their policies.

In considering this correlation, we couldn't help but reflect on the age-old question: "Why did the tomato turn red?" Because it saw the salad dressing! Jokes aside, the findings of this study encourage us to rethink the symbiotic relationship between labor market trends and political preferences, demonstrating that sometimes, the influence of a profession extends beyond the realms of economics and into the polling stations.

While we've certainly had our fun with meaty puns and dad jokes, the implications of our findings point to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the political landscape. As we unravel the connections between everyday occupations and electoral outcomes, it becomes clear that there is more to democracy than meets the eye. Perhaps next time, when faced with the question of whether politics is a cutthroat business, we should also consider whether it's a "cutbeef" business. After all, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a good beef brisket recipe." With this study, we hope to add a bit of spice to the discourse and offer food for thought (pun definitely intended).


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and meat - two essential components of human society, each with its own unique flavor. As the saying goes, "Where's the beef?" Well, in this case, it seems to be in the voting booths of Iowa. This study seeks to uncover the intriguing relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. To paraphrase a classic, it's time to put on our statistical apron and start slicing through the data to reveal the meaty truth behind this curious association.
First things first, though. Why did the butcher become a Republican? Because he wanted to bring home the bacon, of course! Now that we've gotten that out of our system, let's delve into the heart of the matter (pun intended).
Upon conducting our analysis and crunching the numbers with the precision of a skilled chef, we discovered a strong correlation between the surge in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the rise in the number of butchers across the state. It's almost as if the aroma of sizzling steaks was compelling voters to lean in a particular political direction. One does wonder if political platforms should start including "grill rights" in their policies.
In considering this correlation, we couldn't help but reflect on the age-old question: "Why did the tomato turn red?" Because it saw the salad dressing! Jokes aside, the findings of this study encourage us to rethink the symbiotic relationship between labor market trends and political preferences, demonstrating that sometimes, the influence of a profession extends beyond the realms of economics and into the polling stations.
While we've certainly had our fun with meaty puns and dad jokes, the implications of our findings point to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the political landscape. As we unravel the connections between everyday occupations and electoral outcomes, it becomes clear that there is more to democracy than meets the eye. Perhaps next time, when faced with the question of whether politics is a cutthroat business, we should also consider whether it's a "cutbeef" business. After all, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a good beef brisket recipe." With this study, we hope to add a bit of spice to the discourse and offer food for thought (pun definitely intended).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we dive into the literature to explore the intriguing connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the number of butchers in the state, it is apparent that this subject has been largely overlooked. However, our comprehensive review uncovered a myriad of notable studies shedding light on unexpected relationships between economic factors and political behavior.

In "The Political Economy of Beef: From Pasture to Policy," Smith et al. provide a thorough analysis of the impact of the beef industry on local and national politics. Their work emphasizes the influence of agricultural constituents on voting patterns, raising intriguing questions about the potential clout of butchers in shaping political landscapes.

In a similarly themed study, Doe and Jones examine "The Political Philosophy of Barbecue: Grill to Win" and delve into the intersection of culinary traditions and political ideology. While their focus is not specific to Iowa, their findings suggest that the scent of grilled meats may indeed hold persuasive power over voters' political affiliations, perhaps explaining the correlation we have observed.

Contrary to the serious tone of academic literature, it's worth venturing into the realm of popular non-fiction works that delve into the meaty world of politics and economics. Books like "The Beef Whisperer: A Butcher's Tale" and "Cuts and Votes: The Political Influence of Meat" provide intriguing insights into the intersections of food, labor, and politics, offering a thought-provoking backdrop to our study.

On the fiction front, novels such as "The Sausage Conspiracy" and "Meatocracy: The Beef Strikes Back" provide a satirical take on the potential manipulative influence of butchers on electoral outcomes, blurring the lines between fantasy and the meaty reality we seek to investigate.

Moving into the realm of internet culture, the widely circulated "Iowa Butcher Memes" offer a lighthearted, albeit relevant, demonstration of the public's fascination with the potential influence wielded by this enigmatic profession in the political arena. Whether it's a meme featuring a butcher holding a ballot box or playfully wielding a sausage as a gavel, the broader interest in this topic is apparent.

In a sense, our exploration into the literature surrounding this topic resembles a finely aged steak – rich, complex, and occasionally marbled with unexpected humor. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of political behavior, it is clear that the meat of the matter goes beyond mere sustenance and delves into the very fabric of democracy itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Politics and meat - two essential components of human society, each with its own unique flavor. As the saying goes, "Where's the beef?" Well, in this case, it seems to be in the voting booths of Iowa. This study seeks to uncover the intriguing relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. To paraphrase a classic, it's time to put on our statistical apron and start slicing through the data to reveal the meaty truth behind this curious association.
First things first, though. Why did the butcher become a Republican? Because he wanted to bring home the bacon, of course! Now that we've gotten that out of our system, let's delve into the heart of the matter (pun intended).
Upon conducting our analysis and crunching the numbers with the precision of a skilled chef, we discovered a strong correlation between the surge in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the rise in the number of butchers across the state. It's almost as if the aroma of sizzling steaks was compelling voters to lean in a particular political direction. One does wonder if political platforms should start including "grill rights" in their policies.
In considering this correlation, we couldn't help but reflect on the age-old question: "Why did the tomato turn red?" Because it saw the salad dressing! Jokes aside, the findings of this study encourage us to rethink the symbiotic relationship between labor market trends and political preferences, demonstrating that sometimes, the influence of a profession extends beyond the realms of economics and into the polling stations.
While we've certainly had our fun with meaty puns and dad jokes, the implications of our findings point to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the political landscape. As we unravel the connections between everyday occupations and electoral outcomes, it becomes clear that there is more to democracy than meets the eye. Perhaps next time, when faced with the question of whether politics is a cutthroat business, we should also consider whether it's a "cutbeef" business. After all, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a good beef brisket recipe." With this study, we hope to add a bit of spice to the discourse and offer food for thought (pun definitely intended).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To meat the objectives of this study, we embarked on a wild and exciting journey through the vast expanse of data from the years 2003 to 2020. Our first task was to gather data regarding Republican votes for Senators in Iowa from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab. It was like trying to find the pick of the litter in a sea of political data, but we managed to sniff out the pertinent information with the precision of a bloodhound. Next, we ventured into the realm of labor statistics, delving into the Bureau of Labor Statistics to source the number of butchers in Iowa. We can certainly say this part of the process was a cut above the rest!

With these data in hand, we performed an exhaustive and, dare I say, "meat"-iculous statistical analysis to determine the correlation between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the number of butchers in the state. Using a combination of regression analysis and correlation coefficient computations, we attempted to uncover the beefy truth behind this intriguing connection.

Now, you may be wondering, what do you call a cow with a twitch? Beef jerky! But let's not steer off course - back to the methodology. As we trotted through the statistical pastures, we employed a rigorous approach to account for potential confounding variables and ensure the robustness of our findings.

To mold a more comprehensive and toothsome understanding of the relationship between the political and butchery realms, we also employed a time series analysis, allowing us to savor the changes over the years and unravel any delectable trends that might have been hidden within the data. We marinated, stewed, and finally brought to the boil our findings, all to serve up a juicy revelation about the tantalizing correlation between Republican votes for Senators and the number of butchers in Iowa.

In essence, our methodology sought to blend the best practices from the fields of political science, labor economics, and statisti-"cal" analysis to tenderize the meaty truth of this curious connection. And now, onto the main course, where we unveal (pun intended!) the beefy results of our findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8841947, r-squared of 0.7818002, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Politics and meat - two essential components of human society, each with its own unique flavor. As the saying goes, "Where's the beef?" Well, in this case, it seems to be in the voting booths of Iowa. This study seeks to uncover the intriguing relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. To paraphrase a classic, it's time to put on our statistical apron and start slicing through the data to reveal the meaty truth behind this curious association.
First things first, though. Why did the butcher become a Republican? Because he wanted to bring home the bacon, of course! Now that we've gotten that out of our system, let's delve into the heart of the matter (pun intended).
Upon conducting our analysis and crunching the numbers with the precision of a skilled chef, we discovered a strong correlation between the surge in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the rise in the number of butchers across the state. It's almost as if the aroma of sizzling steaks was compelling voters to lean in a particular political direction. One does wonder if political platforms should start including "grill rights" in their policies.
In considering this correlation, we couldn't help but reflect on the age-old question: "Why did the tomato turn red?" Because it saw the salad dressing! Jokes aside, the findings of this study encourage us to rethink the symbiotic relationship between labor market trends and political preferences, demonstrating that sometimes, the influence of a profession extends beyond the realms of economics and into the polling stations.
While we've certainly had our fun with meaty puns and dad jokes, the implications of our findings point to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the political landscape. As we unravel the connections between everyday occupations and electoral outcomes, it becomes clear that there is more to democracy than meets the eye. Perhaps next time, when faced with the question of whether politics is a cutthroat business, we should also consider whether it's a "cutbeef" business. After all, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a good beef brisket recipe." With this study, we hope to add a bit of spice to the discourse and offer food for thought (pun definitely intended).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8841947, r-squared of 0.7818002, and p < 0.05 for the time period of 2003 to 2020. This strong correlation indicates that as the number of butchers in Iowa increased, so did the Republican votes for Senators, leaving us with the undeniable conclusion that butchers and ballots are more entangled than we might have "meat" (pun intended).

The resulting scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the unmistakable positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators and the number of butchers in Iowa. The upward trend in the scatterplot is as clear as the grill marks on a perfectly cooked steak. It seems that the aroma of sizzling meat and the allure of political engagement go hand in hand, like a well-seasoned brisket and barbecue sauce.

The intriguing nature of this correlation sparks a myriad of questions. Is it the butchers' persuasive ability, the symbolic representation of a thriving local economy, or just the result of a shared love for grilled meat that influences their political stance? As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and in this case, where there are butchers, there's a bold Republican vote.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and the number of butchers in Iowa but also showcases the undeniable influence of the meat industry on political preferences. It appears that there's more to Iowa's political landscape than mere steakholders – the butchers are holding their own too!

Now, let's not butcher the interpretation of these results, but it seems that at the intersection of poll and pole, the aroma of grilled meat does have a considerable influence. And in the wise words of Ronald Reagan, "Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then go out with a bang."

Overall, our findings are rare, juicy, and undeniably well seasoned – much like a perfectly grilled steak. So, let's raise a toast to the unexpected connections uncovered in this study and remember, when it comes to political research, the meat of the matter is always something to chew on.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we dive into the literature to explore the intriguing connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the number of butchers in the state, it is apparent that this subject has been largely overlooked. However, our comprehensive review uncovered a myriad of notable studies shedding light on unexpected relationships between economic factors and political behavior.
In "The Political Economy of Beef: From Pasture to Policy," Smith et al. provide a thorough analysis of the impact of the beef industry on local and national politics. Their work emphasizes the influence of agricultural constituents on voting patterns, raising intriguing questions about the potential clout of butchers in shaping political landscapes.
In a similarly themed study, Doe and Jones examine "The Political Philosophy of Barbecue: Grill to Win" and delve into the intersection of culinary traditions and political ideology. While their focus is not specific to Iowa, their findings suggest that the scent of grilled meats may indeed hold persuasive power over voters' political affiliations, perhaps explaining the correlation we have observed.
Contrary to the serious tone of academic literature, it's worth venturing into the realm of popular non-fiction works that delve into the meaty world of politics and economics. Books like "The Beef Whisperer: A Butcher's Tale" and "Cuts and Votes: The Political Influence of Meat" provide intriguing insights into the intersections of food, labor, and politics, offering a thought-provoking backdrop to our study.
On the fiction front, novels such as "The Sausage Conspiracy" and "Meatocracy: The Beef Strikes Back" provide a satirical take on the potential manipulative influence of butchers on electoral outcomes, blurring the lines between fantasy and the meaty reality we seek to investigate.
Moving into the realm of internet culture, the widely circulated "Iowa Butcher Memes" offer a lighthearted, albeit relevant, demonstration of the public's fascination with the potential influence wielded by this enigmatic profession in the political arena. Whether it's a meme featuring a butcher holding a ballot box or playfully wielding a sausage as a gavel, the broader interest in this topic is apparent.
In a sense, our exploration into the literature surrounding this topic resembles a finely aged steak – rich, complex, and occasionally marbled with unexpected humor. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of political behavior, it is clear that the meat of the matter goes beyond mere sustenance and delves into the very fabric of democracy itself.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8841947, r-squared of 0.7818002, and p < 0.05 for the time period of 2003 to 2020. This strong correlation indicates that as the number of butchers in Iowa increased, so did the Republican votes for Senators, leaving us with the undeniable conclusion that butchers and ballots are more entangled than we might have "meat" (pun intended).
The resulting scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the unmistakable positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators and the number of butchers in Iowa. The upward trend in the scatterplot is as clear as the grill marks on a perfectly cooked steak. It seems that the aroma of sizzling meat and the allure of political engagement go hand in hand, like a well-seasoned brisket and barbecue sauce.
The intriguing nature of this correlation sparks a myriad of questions. Is it the butchers' persuasive ability, the symbolic representation of a thriving local economy, or just the result of a shared love for grilled meat that influences their political stance? As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and in this case, where there are butchers, there's a bold Republican vote.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and the number of butchers in Iowa but also showcases the undeniable influence of the meat industry on political preferences. It appears that there's more to Iowa's political landscape than mere steakholders – the butchers are holding their own too!
Now, let's not butcher the interpretation of these results, but it seems that at the intersection of poll and pole, the aroma of grilled meat does have a considerable influence. And in the wise words of Ronald Reagan, "Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then go out with a bang."
Overall, our findings are rare, juicy, and undeniably well seasoned – much like a perfectly grilled steak. So, let's raise a toast to the unexpected connections uncovered in this study and remember, when it comes to political research, the meat of the matter is always something to chew on.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The connection we have unveiled between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators is, quite frankly, a rare find – a true beef of an observation (pardon the pun). As we trawl through the literature review, the unexpected links between economic sectors and political choices do not disappoint; in fact, they are as meaty as a USDA prime rib-eye steak from your local butcher. Smith et al.'s work on the beef industry's political influence served as a substantial prelude to our findings, emphasizing the sway that agricultural constituents hold in voting patterns. Similarly, Doe and Jones' examination of the intersection of culinary traditions and political ideology touched upon a key aspect of our results – the persuasive power that the scent of grilled meats may hold over voters' political affiliations.

Our results stand in solidarity with the intriguing suggestions put forward by these prior works, showcasing a correlation so robust that it's as conspicuous as a cow in a cornfield. It's clear that, just like a well-marbled Wagyu steak, the relationship between the number of butchers and Republican votes is undeniably rich and full of flavor. It's no longer just a joke about the rump, but we must grill down and take these findings seriously. The meat of the matter is – our results bolster and intensify the intriguing propositions embraced by the literature we have reviewed.

Now, let's not mince words. The statistical strength of our correlation is as impressive as a perfectly sharpened cleaver – a hearty, beefy coefficient that commands attention. The upward trend in the scatterplot simmers like a pot of beef stew, lending credence to the notion that butchers and ballots are more intricately intertwined than we could have "meat" (pun intended).

In the grand theater of politics, the aroma of sizzling meat has emerged as a heavyweight contender, akin to a prime cut fresh off the grill, making the connection between butchers and ballots one that's difficult to overlook. Our findings provide something substantial to chew on, a cut of knowledge to sink your teeth into. Whether one agrees or disagrees with our results, there's no denying that the beefy undertones of this correlation add a delectable garnish to the political discourse.

In the end, it appears that the influence of butchers in Iowa is worth more than just a throwaway joke; their impact is as piquant as a rub of paprika on a rack of ribs. Our study not only reinforces the intriguing proposals put forth by our literary predecessors but also injects a hefty slab of substance into the debate. After all, in the carnivorous world of political examination, it's always best to have one's steak and eat it too.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and The number of butchers in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!

But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.

In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Politics and meat - two essential components of human society, each with its own unique flavor. As the saying goes, "Where's the beef?" Well, in this case, it seems to be in the voting booths of Iowa. This study seeks to uncover the intriguing relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. To paraphrase a classic, it's time to put on our statistical apron and start slicing through the data to reveal the meaty truth behind this curious association.
First things first, though. Why did the butcher become a Republican? Because he wanted to bring home the bacon, of course! Now that we've gotten that out of our system, let's delve into the heart of the matter (pun intended).
Upon conducting our analysis and crunching the numbers with the precision of a skilled chef, we discovered a strong correlation between the surge in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the rise in the number of butchers across the state. It's almost as if the aroma of sizzling steaks was compelling voters to lean in a particular political direction. One does wonder if political platforms should start including "grill rights" in their policies.
In considering this correlation, we couldn't help but reflect on the age-old question: "Why did the tomato turn red?" Because it saw the salad dressing! Jokes aside, the findings of this study encourage us to rethink the symbiotic relationship between labor market trends and political preferences, demonstrating that sometimes, the influence of a profession extends beyond the realms of economics and into the polling stations.
While we've certainly had our fun with meaty puns and dad jokes, the implications of our findings point to a deeper understanding of the dynamics at play in the political landscape. As we unravel the connections between everyday occupations and electoral outcomes, it becomes clear that there is more to democracy than meets the eye. Perhaps next time, when faced with the question of whether politics is a cutthroat business, we should also consider whether it's a "cutbeef" business. After all, in the words of Benjamin Franklin, "In this world, nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes, and a good beef brisket recipe." With this study, we hope to add a bit of spice to the discourse and offer food for thought (pun definitely intended).

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis unveiled a remarkably strong correlation between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8841947, r-squared of 0.7818002, and p < 0.05 for the time period of 2003 to 2020. This strong correlation indicates that as the number of butchers in Iowa increased, so did the Republican votes for Senators, leaving us with the undeniable conclusion that butchers and ballots are more entangled than we might have "meat" (pun intended).
The resulting scatterplot (Fig. 1) depicts the unmistakable positive correlation between Republican votes for Senators and the number of butchers in Iowa. The upward trend in the scatterplot is as clear as the grill marks on a perfectly cooked steak. It seems that the aroma of sizzling meat and the allure of political engagement go hand in hand, like a well-seasoned brisket and barbecue sauce.
The intriguing nature of this correlation sparks a myriad of questions. Is it the butchers' persuasive ability, the symbolic representation of a thriving local economy, or just the result of a shared love for grilled meat that influences their political stance? As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire," and in this case, where there are butchers, there's a bold Republican vote.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and the number of butchers in Iowa but also showcases the undeniable influence of the meat industry on political preferences. It appears that there's more to Iowa's political landscape than mere steakholders – the butchers are holding their own too!
Now, let's not butcher the interpretation of these results, but it seems that at the intersection of poll and pole, the aroma of grilled meat does have a considerable influence. And in the wise words of Ronald Reagan, "Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, coast for a while, and then go out with a bang."
Overall, our findings are rare, juicy, and undeniably well seasoned – much like a perfectly grilled steak. So, let's raise a toast to the unexpected connections uncovered in this study and remember, when it comes to political research, the meat of the matter is always something to chew on.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study present a compelling case for the entwined relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and the Republican votes for Senators. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 highlight the beefy truth behind this unexpected association. It seems that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices - a real "rare" revelation, if you will.

As we wrap up our analysis, it's clear that the influence of butchers on political leanings in Iowa is not just a mere "sausage" of statistics. Our results indicate a profound connection that cannot be "meat"ly disregarded. It appears that the aroma of sizzling meat and the allure of political engagement indeed go hand in hand, much like a well-matched steak and wine pairing.

Now, it would be a missed "steak" to overlook the implications of these findings. It's not every day that we stumble upon such a juicy correlation in the realm of political research. This study not only puts a "rare" spotlight on the role of everyday occupations in shaping electoral outcomes but also offers a fresh perspective on the dynamics at play in the political landscape.

With such flavorful findings, we believe this study serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.

Therefore, with the sizzle of the skillet still echoing in our ears, we boldly assert that no more research is needed in this area. The connection between Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the number of butchers is as clear as a prime cut of beef - it's time to hang up our aprons and relish in the "meat"y success of this study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Butchery


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

National Institute for Butcher Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Meat of the Matter: Correlating Republican Votes for Senators in Iowa with the Number of Butchers in Iowa with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing and, dare I say, meaty relationship between the number of butchers in Iowa and Republican votes for Senators. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team sought to uncover the beefy truth behind this connection. Our findings revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8841947 and p < 0.05 for the years 2003 to 2020, leaving us both astounded and pleasantly amused. It appears that there's more than just meat on the grill when it comes to these electoral choices!
But enough meaty puns, let's dig into the results. The statistical analysis unveiled a striking link between the increase in Republican votes for Senators in Iowa and the surge in the number of butchers in the state. While it may sound like a bit of a stretch, this correlation stood out like a steak in a vegetarian restaurant - it was hard to miss. Our findings suggest that butchers wield a profound influence on the political leanings of the good folks of Iowa, or perhaps there's a secret sausage-based political strategy at play.
In conclusion, our research not only sheds light on the relationship between Republican votes and butchers in Iowa but also serves as a reminder that sometimes, in the realm of politics, things can get a little bit "meaty." Whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, one thing is clear: the steak of our findings is well done and worth sinking your teeth into.
Remember, when it comes to political research, the proof is in the pudding...or in this case, the beef.

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, Senators, Iowa, butchers, correlation, election data, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, political leanings, election choices, sausage-based political strategy, influence of butchers on politics, meaty relationship, beefy truth, political research, meaty puns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in Iowa
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa

The number of butchers in Iowa
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of butchers and meat cutters in Iowa
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of butchers in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.8841947 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7818002 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of butchers in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa) over the 6 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.019. 0.0193397841513339650000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 1.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 52 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.26, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420082010201420162020
Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa (Percentage of votes)70.183637.261264.352552.100160.089950.8783
The number of butchers in Iowa (Laborers)352019802680285030402630




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([70.1836,37.2612,64.3525,52.1001,60.0899,50.8783,])
array_2 = np.array([3520,1980,2680,2850,3040,2630,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in Iowa"
array_2_name = "The number of butchers in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4417 · Black Variable ID: 26386 · Red Variable ID: 8077
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0