about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,558 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US household spending on home maintenance and the second variable is The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on home maintenance increased, more people were investing in high-security locks. This led to a spike in interest in lock-picking videos, boosting the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer’s YouTube channel. After all, there’s nothing like a well-maintained home to lock in those likes!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that combines the style of a TIME magazine cover with the scene of a suburban neighborhood. The focus is on a house with freshly painted walls and neatly trimmed hedges standing out amidst other homes in different states of repair. People are depicted investing in high-security locks for their doors and windows, showing a sense of urgency and interest in home security. Additionally, include a smartphone playing a video tutorial by LockPickingLawyer on the latest high-security locks, with the like button visibly glowing as the average number of likes on his videos increases. Capture the essence of security-consciousness and technology consumption within a typical suburban setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art A scene from Skyrim A TIME magazine cover image a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, in the following situation: As household spending on home maintenance increased, more people were investing in high-security locks. This led to a spike in interest in lock-picking videos, boosting the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer’s YouTube channel. After all, there’s nothing like a well-maintained home to lock in those likes!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a suburban neighborhood, a house with freshly painted walls and neatly trimmed hedges stands out against the backdrop of homes in different states of repair. People are seen investing in high-security locks for their doors and windows, visibly interested in home security. Meanwhile, on a nearby smartphone, a video of LockPickingLawyer's tutorial on the latest high-security locks is playing, with the like button glowing as the average number of likes on his videos increases.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a suburban neighborhood, a house with freshly painted walls and neatly trimmed hedges stands out against the backdrop of homes in different states of repair. People are seen investing in high-security locks for their doors and windows, visibly interested in home security. Meanwhile, on a nearby smartphone, a video of LockPickingLawyer's tutorial on the latest high-security locks is playing, with the like button glowing as the average number of likes on his videos increases. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that combines the style of a TIME magazine cover with the scene of a suburban neighborhood. The focus is on a house with freshly painted walls and neatly trimmed hedges standing out amidst other homes in different states of repair. People are depicted investing in high-security locks for their doors and windows, showing a sense of urgency and interest in home security. Additionally, include a smartphone playing a video tutorial by LockPickingLawyer on the latest high-security locks, with the like button visibly glowing as the average number of likes on his videos increases. Capture the essence of security-consciousness and technology consumption within a typical suburban setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US household spending on home maintenance caused The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes

The Journal of Eccentric Consumer Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Unlocking the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been a task akin to picking a particularly complex lock – requiring precision, patience, and a good sense of humor. As we present our findings, we hope to shed light on this novel and somewhat unexpected connection, all while adding a bit of levity and wit to our scholarly pursuits.

In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in examining the correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might say it's like trying to pick a lock using a rubber chicken – it seems improbable, but with a little ingenuity, one might just find a way. Our research delves into this unconventional territory, aiming to reveal the underlying mechanisms that tie together household maintenance and the engrossing world of lock-picking content on YouTube.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analyses indicates a robust and statistically significant relationship between these variables. Talk about a lock-solid connection! This suggests that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a commensurate rise in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as if the more we invest in our homes, the more we find ourselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking escapades – a puzzling yet intriguing parallel.

In the spirit of maintaining a light-hearted tone, here's a dad-approved joke to lighten the scholarly mood: Why did the locksmith go to therapy? Because he had too many issues to work through! In a similar vein, our research aims to navigate the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking entertainment, all while keeping our sense of humor intact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Unlocking the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been a task akin to picking a particularly complex lock – requiring precision, patience, and a good sense of humor. As we present our findings, we hope to shed light on this novel and somewhat unexpected connection, all while adding a bit of levity and wit to our scholarly pursuits.
In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in examining the correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might say it's like trying to pick a lock using a rubber chicken – it seems improbable, but with a little ingenuity, one might just find a way. Our research delves into this unconventional territory, aiming to reveal the underlying mechanisms that tie together household maintenance and the engrossing world of lock-picking content on YouTube.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analyses indicates a robust and statistically significant relationship between these variables. Talk about a lock-solid connection! This suggests that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a commensurate rise in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as if the more we invest in our homes, the more we find ourselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking escapades – a puzzling yet intriguing parallel.
In the spirit of maintaining a light-hearted tone, here's a dad-approved joke to lighten the scholarly mood: Why did the locksmith go to therapy? Because he had too many issues to work through! In a similar vein, our research aims to navigate the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking entertainment, all while keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has perplexed scholars and enthusiasts alike. In "Unlocking the Mystery: Investigating Unlikely Correlations" by Smith, the authors find that seemingly disparate consumer behaviors often exhibit unexpected connections. This sentiment is aptly captured in the unusual correlation uncovered in our study.

Further exploring the topic, Doe et al. in "Home Economics: A Modern Approach" delve into the intricate dynamics of household spending patterns. However, none could have foreseen the uncanny parallel between home maintenance investments and burgeoning interest in lock-picking content. It's a bit like trying to unlock a door with a banana – initially nonsensical, but with our findings, it has become an undeniable reality.

Turning to a more lighthearted discourse, Jones in "Tumblers and Torsion: A Modern Guide to Lock-Picking" offers a comprehensive overview of the niche world of lock-picking. Despite the serious tone of the subject matter, our investigation has revealed a surprising correlation that is sure to "tumble" the conventional wisdom in this domain.

In the realm of fiction, "The Lock Mysteries: Tales of Intrigue and Innovation" by Johnson, and "The Art of Home Maintenance: A Novel Approach" by Lee, both evoke the resonance of our findings in an eerily prescient manner. The serendipity of these fictional works in mirroring our real-life study is akin to finding a hidden key in unexpected places.

As an integral part of our research process, we also drew inspiration from popular culture, namely "Breaking and Entering" and "Lockdown Locksmiths," two TV shows that provided valuable insights into the world of locks and security. The parallels we uncovered in our study resonate with the intriguing escapades portrayed in these shows, albeit with a touch of statistical analysis and scholarly rigor.

In the realm of unexpected and interconnected phenomena, our research exemplifies the fusion of statistical inquiry and comedic relief. Much like a well-crafted lock, our findings are poised to unlock new avenues of exploration and amusement in the realms of consumer behavior and YouTube engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Unlocking the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been a task akin to picking a particularly complex lock – requiring precision, patience, and a good sense of humor. As we present our findings, we hope to shed light on this novel and somewhat unexpected connection, all while adding a bit of levity and wit to our scholarly pursuits.
In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in examining the correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might say it's like trying to pick a lock using a rubber chicken – it seems improbable, but with a little ingenuity, one might just find a way. Our research delves into this unconventional territory, aiming to reveal the underlying mechanisms that tie together household maintenance and the engrossing world of lock-picking content on YouTube.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analyses indicates a robust and statistically significant relationship between these variables. Talk about a lock-solid connection! This suggests that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a commensurate rise in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as if the more we invest in our homes, the more we find ourselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking escapades – a puzzling yet intriguing parallel.
In the spirit of maintaining a light-hearted tone, here's a dad-approved joke to lighten the scholarly mood: Why did the locksmith go to therapy? Because he had too many issues to work through! In a similar vein, our research aims to navigate the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking entertainment, all while keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To ascertain the purported connection between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, our research team engaged in a methodological endeavor that was as intricate as, well, picking a lock with a toothpick. We meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, aptly named for keeping tabs on every household expenditure, and YouTube, the virtual treasure trove of video content. Data spanning from 2015 to 2022 was analyzed with the utmost precision and a touch of whimsy.

First, we delved into the labyrinthine world of household spending on home maintenance, navigating through the Bureau of Labor Statistics databases with the same determination one might employ when attempting to open a particularly obstinate lock. We examined categories such as home maintenance tools, locksmith services, and even the elusive category of "other expenses" – because, as any lock-picking enthusiast knows, sometimes the key to success lies in the unexpected.

Next, we ventured into the realm of YouTube analytics, sifting through the multitude of LockPickingLawyer's intriguing videos with the tenacity and precision of a locksmith mastering a complex tumbler. The average number of likes on these videos served as our key metric, offering insight into the level of engagement and affinity toward lock-picking content. We also factored in variables such as video upload frequency and the complexity of the locks featured, because in the world of lock-picking, nuances matter just as much as in statistical analyses.

In the true spirit of our lighthearted approach, we injected a bit of levity into our methodological pursuits. At times, we found ourselves counting lock-picking lawyer likes and home maintenance expenditures with the giddy excitement of a child on a treasure hunt, because even serious research can benefit from a dash of playfulness.

After meticulously compiling and cleansing the data, we employed robust statistical methods, careful not to lock ourselves into a single approach. Regression analyses, time series modeling, and even a touch of Bayesian inference were utilized to unlock the intricate relationship between household spending on home maintenance and the lock-picking fervor exhibited through YouTube likes. Our statistical toolbox was as diverse and versatile as a locksmith's collection of tools, ensuring that we could deftly handle any statistical tumbler that stood in our way.

In the playful spirit of our research, allow me to offer a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths make good boxers? Because they always make a bolt for the door! Just as a well-placed pun can lighten the mood, our research methodically and joyfully elucidated the captivating relationship between home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination, all while celebrating the unexpected connections that make scholarly pursuits endlessly engaging.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9881117, r-squared of 0.9763648, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Unlocking the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been a task akin to picking a particularly complex lock – requiring precision, patience, and a good sense of humor. As we present our findings, we hope to shed light on this novel and somewhat unexpected connection, all while adding a bit of levity and wit to our scholarly pursuits.
In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in examining the correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might say it's like trying to pick a lock using a rubber chicken – it seems improbable, but with a little ingenuity, one might just find a way. Our research delves into this unconventional territory, aiming to reveal the underlying mechanisms that tie together household maintenance and the engrossing world of lock-picking content on YouTube.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analyses indicates a robust and statistically significant relationship between these variables. Talk about a lock-solid connection! This suggests that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a commensurate rise in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as if the more we invest in our homes, the more we find ourselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking escapades – a puzzling yet intriguing parallel.
In the spirit of maintaining a light-hearted tone, here's a dad-approved joke to lighten the scholarly mood: Why did the locksmith go to therapy? Because he had too many issues to work through! In a similar vein, our research aims to navigate the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking entertainment, all while keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881117, with an r-squared value of 0.9763648 and p < 0.01. These results highlight a remarkably strong and statistically significant association between these two seemingly unrelated variables, providing a key insight into the intertwined nature of home maintenance and lock-picking interest.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as clear and undeniable as a well-picked lock!

As we unlock the mystery behind this unexpected relationship, our findings suggest a captivating parallel between increased investment in home maintenance and heightened engagement with lock-picking content. It's as if the more effort people put into maintaining their homes, the more they find themselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking adventures – a tale of two locks, if you will.

In the spirit of adding a touch of whimsy to our scholarly endeavor, here's a dad-approved joke: Why are locksmiths the best at math? Because they know all about the combinations! Just as a locksmith masterfully navigates through combinations, our research has deftly uncovered the numerical connections between home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination.

Overall, our study contributes a unique perspective on the interplay between household expenditure on maintenance and the captivating allure of lock-picking content on YouTube, revealing a correlation that is not easily locked away.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has perplexed scholars and enthusiasts alike. In "Unlocking the Mystery: Investigating Unlikely Correlations" by Smith, the authors find that seemingly disparate consumer behaviors often exhibit unexpected connections. This sentiment is aptly captured in the unusual correlation uncovered in our study.
Further exploring the topic, Doe et al. in "Home Economics: A Modern Approach" delve into the intricate dynamics of household spending patterns. However, none could have foreseen the uncanny parallel between home maintenance investments and burgeoning interest in lock-picking content. It's a bit like trying to unlock a door with a banana – initially nonsensical, but with our findings, it has become an undeniable reality.
Turning to a more lighthearted discourse, Jones in "Tumblers and Torsion: A Modern Guide to Lock-Picking" offers a comprehensive overview of the niche world of lock-picking. Despite the serious tone of the subject matter, our investigation has revealed a surprising correlation that is sure to "tumble" the conventional wisdom in this domain.
In the realm of fiction, "The Lock Mysteries: Tales of Intrigue and Innovation" by Johnson, and "The Art of Home Maintenance: A Novel Approach" by Lee, both evoke the resonance of our findings in an eerily prescient manner. The serendipity of these fictional works in mirroring our real-life study is akin to finding a hidden key in unexpected places.
As an integral part of our research process, we also drew inspiration from popular culture, namely "Breaking and Entering" and "Lockdown Locksmiths," two TV shows that provided valuable insights into the world of locks and security. The parallels we uncovered in our study resonate with the intriguing escapades portrayed in these shows, albeit with a touch of statistical analysis and scholarly rigor.
In the realm of unexpected and interconnected phenomena, our research exemplifies the fusion of statistical inquiry and comedic relief. Much like a well-crafted lock, our findings are poised to unlock new avenues of exploration and amusement in the realms of consumer behavior and YouTube engagement.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881117, with an r-squared value of 0.9763648 and p < 0.01. These results highlight a remarkably strong and statistically significant association between these two seemingly unrelated variables, providing a key insight into the intertwined nature of home maintenance and lock-picking interest.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as clear and undeniable as a well-picked lock!
As we unlock the mystery behind this unexpected relationship, our findings suggest a captivating parallel between increased investment in home maintenance and heightened engagement with lock-picking content. It's as if the more effort people put into maintaining their homes, the more they find themselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking adventures – a tale of two locks, if you will.
In the spirit of adding a touch of whimsy to our scholarly endeavor, here's a dad-approved joke: Why are locksmiths the best at math? Because they know all about the combinations! Just as a locksmith masterfully navigates through combinations, our research has deftly uncovered the numerical connections between home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination.
Overall, our study contributes a unique perspective on the interplay between household expenditure on maintenance and the captivating allure of lock-picking content on YouTube, revealing a correlation that is not easily locked away.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 (p < 0.01) that we uncovered certainly suggests that there is more to this relationship than meets the eye. It's as if the act of keeping our homes secure and well-maintained is somehow intricately linked to our online fascination with lock-picking antics. It's like discovering a hidden key in the most unexpected of places!

Our findings align with prior research that has emphasized the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly disparate factors. Analogous to trying to unlock a door with a banana, the unlikely correlation we unveiled in our study challenges conventional wisdom and sheds new light on the whimsical nature of consumer behavior and YouTube engagement.

The uncanny parallel between home maintenance investments and burgeoning interest in lock-picking content aptly reflects the intriguing fusion of statistical inquiry and lighthearted curiosity. It's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure in the depths of an old attic – unexpected, delightful, and undeniably real.

Moreover, our results echo the sentiments expressed in various literary works and TV shows. They permeate through the figurative "tumblers and torsions" of our understanding, indicating that the unexpected connection between home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination is more than just a statistical oddity. It's as though the lock of consumer behavior has been picked, and a whole new dimension of understanding has been unlocked.

The joke that we have incorporated into our discussion serves as a humorous interlude amidst the scholarly exploration, much like a well-timed punchline in a comedy act. Why are locksmiths the best at math? Because they know all about the combinations! This jest playfully reflects the unexpected numerical connections that our research has revealed, adding a touch of whimsy to our otherwise serious discourse.

In essence, our study not only provides valuable insights into the interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination but also exemplifies the fusion of statistical inquiry and comedic relief. Like an expertly picked lock, our findings have unveiled new avenues of exploration and amusement in the domains of consumer behavior and YouTube engagement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US household spending on home maintenance and The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.

In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.

In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Unlocking the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been a task akin to picking a particularly complex lock – requiring precision, patience, and a good sense of humor. As we present our findings, we hope to shed light on this novel and somewhat unexpected connection, all while adding a bit of levity and wit to our scholarly pursuits.
In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in examining the correlations between seemingly unrelated phenomena. One might say it's like trying to pick a lock using a rubber chicken – it seems improbable, but with a little ingenuity, one might just find a way. Our research delves into this unconventional territory, aiming to reveal the underlying mechanisms that tie together household maintenance and the engrossing world of lock-picking content on YouTube.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analyses indicates a robust and statistically significant relationship between these variables. Talk about a lock-solid connection! This suggests that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a commensurate rise in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as if the more we invest in our homes, the more we find ourselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking escapades – a puzzling yet intriguing parallel.
In the spirit of maintaining a light-hearted tone, here's a dad-approved joke to lighten the scholarly mood: Why did the locksmith go to therapy? Because he had too many issues to work through! In a similar vein, our research aims to navigate the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking entertainment, all while keeping our sense of humor intact.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9881117, with an r-squared value of 0.9763648 and p < 0.01. These results highlight a remarkably strong and statistically significant association between these two seemingly unrelated variables, providing a key insight into the intertwined nature of home maintenance and lock-picking interest.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. It's as clear and undeniable as a well-picked lock!
As we unlock the mystery behind this unexpected relationship, our findings suggest a captivating parallel between increased investment in home maintenance and heightened engagement with lock-picking content. It's as if the more effort people put into maintaining their homes, the more they find themselves drawn to the fascinating world of lock-picking adventures – a tale of two locks, if you will.
In the spirit of adding a touch of whimsy to our scholarly endeavor, here's a dad-approved joke: Why are locksmiths the best at math? Because they know all about the combinations! Just as a locksmith masterfully navigates through combinations, our research has deftly uncovered the numerical connections between home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination.
Overall, our study contributes a unique perspective on the interplay between household expenditure on maintenance and the captivating allure of lock-picking content on YouTube, revealing a correlation that is not easily locked away.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding our investigation, we have successfully unraveled the surprising connection between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Our findings have solidified what might be called a "lock-solid" relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022. It seems that the more households invest in keeping their locks secure, the more they appreciate the art of unlocking them - it's quite the intriguing paradox, isn't it?

As we close the door on this study, let's partake in one final dad-approved joke: Why was the lock so sensitive? It had too many issues to handle! Just like that finicky lock, this research has delicately handled the complex issues at the intersection of home maintenance spending and lock-picking fascination with a keen sense of humor.

Our findings shed light on the unexpectedly intertwined realms of household upkeep and lock-picking enchantment, providing a key insight into the curious connection between these seemingly disparate domains. Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. We've successfully unlocked its mysteries, pun intended!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Consumer Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Social Science Research on Quirky Consumer Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Key to Locked Spending: Unlocking the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Video Likes with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing correlation between US household spending on home maintenance and the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we set out to unearth whether there is a tangible connection between these seemingly disparate factors. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9881117 and p < 0.01 for the years 2015 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship that cannot simply be locked away.
In parsing through the data, we uncovered that as US household spending on home maintenance increases, there is a strikingly parallel uptick in the average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. This intriguing association suggests that as individuals invest in maintaining their homes, they also exhibit an increased interest in the art of lock-picking, as showcased by the LockPickingLawyer. We have aptly coined this phenomenon "lock-lucrative" behavior, shedding light on the unexpectedly interconnected realms of household upkeep and lock-picking fascination.
In the spirit of further elucidating our findings, we provide a Dad-approved joke: Why don't locksmiths ever go on vacation? Because they have too many locks to pick! This lighthearted jest reflects the delightful quirkiness of our research, underscoring the unexpected connections we have unveiled in the world of home maintenance and YouTube engagement.

ChatGPT:

US household spending, home maintenance, LockPickingLawyer, YouTube video likes, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, lock-picking fascination, connection, household upkeep, lock-lucrative behavior, association, data analysis, home maintenance investment, lock-picking interest, lock-picking trends, unusual correlations, unexpected connections, YouTube engagement, Dad-approved joke

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US household spending on home maintenance
Detailed data title: Annual US household spend on home maintenance, as a percentage of total household spend
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with US household spending on home maintenance

The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9881117 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9763648 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US household spending on home maintenance) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-6. 0.0000041630859982258400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.00042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 240,206 random variables You don't actually need 240 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
US household spending on home maintenance (Household spend)2.568872.507372.690642.781592.980843.518443.488823.50706
The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos (Average likes)2462.081751.789534.8420437.128255.250838.249724.745055.3




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.56887,2.50737,2.69064,2.78159,2.98084,3.51844,3.48882,3.50706,])
array_2 = np.array([2462.08,1751.78,9534.84,20437.1,28255.2,50838.2,49724.7,45055.3,])
array_1_name = "US household spending on home maintenance"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 4558 · Black Variable ID: 19965 · Red Variable ID: 25757
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0