about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,718 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and the second variable is Petroluem consumption in Greenland.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As Greenlanders switched from watching history videos to participating in history-making renewable energy efforts, they realized that the real gas was in creating a sustainable future. This sparked a historic shift towards a greener lifestyle, proving that when it comes to renewable energy, the past is oil in the rearview mirror!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Greenlandic community gathered around a computer, engrossed in an Extra History YouTube video entitled "The Power of Renewable Energy." In the background, showcase the transition from old oil barrels to modern solar panels and wind turbines, symbolizing the shift towards sustainable energy sources. The scene should capture the community's curiosity and enthusiasm for embracing renewable energy, while showcasing the visual contrast between the old and the new. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Sci-fi fantacy A Discovery magazine cover image inspired by bauhaus A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland, in the following situation: As Greenlanders switched from watching history videos to participating in history-making renewable energy efforts, they realized that the real gas was in creating a sustainable future. This sparked a historic shift towards a greener lifestyle, proving that when it comes to renewable energy, the past is oil in the rearview mirror!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a group of Greenlanders is gathered around a computer, watching an insightful Extra History YouTube video with the title "The Power of Renewable Energy." Meanwhile, in the background, we see old oil barrels being replaced by sleek solar panels and wind turbines, symbolizing the shift towards renewable energy and the decrease in petroleum consumption in Greenland.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a group of Greenlanders is gathered around a computer, watching an insightful Extra History YouTube video with the title "The Power of Renewable Energy." Meanwhile, in the background, we see old oil barrels being replaced by sleek solar panels and wind turbines, symbolizing the shift towards renewable energy and the decrease in petroleum consumption in Greenland. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Greenlandic community gathered around a computer, engrossed in an Extra History YouTube video entitled "The Power of Renewable Energy." In the background, showcase the transition from old oil barrels to modern solar panels and wind turbines, symbolizing the shift towards sustainable energy sources. The scene should capture the community's curiosity and enthusiasm for embracing renewable energy, while showcasing the visual contrast between the old and the new.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are caused Petroluem consumption in Greenland to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

The Journal of Amusing Energy and Unconventional Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most profound insights emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. One might expect groundbreaking revelations to spring forth from meticulously conducted laboratory experiments or meticulously parsed economic data. Certainly, the notion that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could hold any sway over the consumption of petroleum in the remote and enigmatic land of Greenland might initially seem preposterous – or even "extra"ordinary. However, as the esteemed playwright Oscar Wilde once quipped, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." With this in mind, we embarked on a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration into the realm of corporate video titling and its unsuspected connection to energy consumption in the Arctic hinterlands.

The divergence between historical curiosity and contemporary energy behavior might seem as wide as the fabled rift between continental plates, but as our intrepid team would discover, the two are not as incongruent as one might assume. Our research sought to harness the neural network capabilities behind advanced artificial intelligence in its inexorable quest to elucidate patterns and relationships. In doing so, we were able to intercept the transfer of information between these seemingly disparate domains. This paper endeavors to present the findings of our joyous jaunt through the landscape of data analysis, where the unexpected links between the whimsically crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in Greenland were laid bare for all to behold.

The interplay between historical curiosity and contemporary petrochemical predilections may appear as incongruous as a polar bear sunbathing on a tropical beach. Yet as our team delved into the depths of historical narratives and uncanny correlations, we found ourselves illuminated by the unanticipated synergies that lie latent within seemingly unrelated spheres. In this paper, we shall embark on an expedition that not only unlocks the secrets of data analysis and statistical significance but also captures the essence of discovery presented with a subtle sparkle of wit and merriment. We invite our esteemed readers to join us on this intellectual romp, as we unravel the whimsical tapestry connecting Extra History YouTube video titles and the intriguing journey of petroleum consumption in Greenland. After all, where else can one find such mirth in the seemingly mundane interplay of academic study and popular culture?

So take a deep breath, brace yourself for the inevitable surprises that lie ahead, and prepare to be regaled with the unexpected whimsy that underpins this scholarly investigation. As we delve deeper into the nexus of history, energy, and digital entertainment, we hope to reveal that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of seemingly unrelated domains can evoke a sense of awe and amusement—one that is not just Extra, but positively extraordinary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most profound insights emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. One might expect groundbreaking revelations to spring forth from meticulously conducted laboratory experiments or meticulously parsed economic data. Certainly, the notion that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could hold any sway over the consumption of petroleum in the remote and enigmatic land of Greenland might initially seem preposterous – or even "extra"ordinary. However, as the esteemed playwright Oscar Wilde once quipped, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." With this in mind, we embarked on a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration into the realm of corporate video titling and its unsuspected connection to energy consumption in the Arctic hinterlands.
The divergence between historical curiosity and contemporary energy behavior might seem as wide as the fabled rift between continental plates, but as our intrepid team would discover, the two are not as incongruent as one might assume. Our research sought to harness the neural network capabilities behind advanced artificial intelligence in its inexorable quest to elucidate patterns and relationships. In doing so, we were able to intercept the transfer of information between these seemingly disparate domains. This paper endeavors to present the findings of our joyous jaunt through the landscape of data analysis, where the unexpected links between the whimsically crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in Greenland were laid bare for all to behold.
The interplay between historical curiosity and contemporary petrochemical predilections may appear as incongruous as a polar bear sunbathing on a tropical beach. Yet as our team delved into the depths of historical narratives and uncanny correlations, we found ourselves illuminated by the unanticipated synergies that lie latent within seemingly unrelated spheres. In this paper, we shall embark on an expedition that not only unlocks the secrets of data analysis and statistical significance but also captures the essence of discovery presented with a subtle sparkle of wit and merriment. We invite our esteemed readers to join us on this intellectual romp, as we unravel the whimsical tapestry connecting Extra History YouTube video titles and the intriguing journey of petroleum consumption in Greenland. After all, where else can one find such mirth in the seemingly mundane interplay of academic study and popular culture?
So take a deep breath, brace yourself for the inevitable surprises that lie ahead, and prepare to be regaled with the unexpected whimsy that underpins this scholarly investigation. As we delve deeper into the nexus of history, energy, and digital entertainment, we hope to reveal that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of seemingly unrelated domains can evoke a sense of awe and amusement—one that is not just Extra, but positively extraordinary.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) delved into the intricacies of YouTube video titles and their potential impact on viewer engagement, laying the groundwork for our own examination of the subject. They noted the strategic use of language and the psychological effects of curiosity-inducing titles, underlining the power of a well-crafted title to captivate an audience. While their focus was on consumer behavior and marketing strategies, their findings indirectly paved the way for our investigation into the unforeseen consequences of such titling on broader societal phenomena – namely, petroleum consumption in Greenland.

Doe (2018) made strides in the realm of energy consumption patterns, exploring the multifaceted factors influencing global fuel usage. While her work primarily centered around economic and environmental variables, the interdisciplinary nature of her research inspired us to consider unconventional influences on energy demand. Her analysis of the contributing factors to petroleum consumption unwittingly set the stage for our offbeat foray into the world of online historical videos and their impact on Greenlandic fuel habits.

Jones (2020) ventured into the realm of historical narration and its role in shaping societal perceptions, setting the stage for our whimsical investigation. His examination of the influence of storytelling on cultural narratives and collective memory laid a foundation for our exploration of unexpected connections between historical curiosity and petroleum usage. Although Jones did not expressly delve into the realm of YouTube titling, his insights into the propagation of historical narratives are serendipitously intertwined with our own endeavor to uncover the playful synergy between engaging video titles and fuel consumption in Greenland.

In "The History of Petroleum in Polar Regions" by Arctic Enthusiast (2016), the author examines the historical significance of petroleum in polar environments, providing a comprehensive overview of the industry's development in regions like Greenland. While this text may not directly address the influence of YouTube titles on petroleum consumption, its insights into the historical and economic aspects of fuel in Arctic territories offer a contextual backdrop for our unconventional inquiry.

Similarly, "Frozen Tundra Tales: An Exploration of Greenlandic Folklore" by Ice Princess (2014) provides a cultural perspective on Greenlandic narratives and storytelling traditions. While the focus of this work is on folklore rather than contemporary media, it underscores the enduring power of storytelling in Greenlandic society. As we delve into the realm of historical narratives in a digital context, this exploration of traditional storytelling serves as a reminder of the enduring significance of narrative engagement in the region.

Moving away from traditional academic sources, we also ventured into the realm of popular culture for insights into historical storytelling and its impact on audience engagement. A thorough analysis of "Phineas and Ferb" episodes featuring historical escapades provided unexpected but invaluable insights into the themes and motifs that captivate audiences, fueling our broader understanding of narrative allure and its potential influence on consumer behavior – including, in our case, petroleum consumption.

The literature, thus far, has laid the foundation for our unorthodox exploration, paving the way for a lighthearted but rigorous investigation into the peculiar yet surprisingly potent connection between the captivating titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in the idiosyncratic realm of Greenland.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most profound insights emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. One might expect groundbreaking revelations to spring forth from meticulously conducted laboratory experiments or meticulously parsed economic data. Certainly, the notion that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could hold any sway over the consumption of petroleum in the remote and enigmatic land of Greenland might initially seem preposterous – or even "extra"ordinary. However, as the esteemed playwright Oscar Wilde once quipped, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." With this in mind, we embarked on a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration into the realm of corporate video titling and its unsuspected connection to energy consumption in the Arctic hinterlands.
The divergence between historical curiosity and contemporary energy behavior might seem as wide as the fabled rift between continental plates, but as our intrepid team would discover, the two are not as incongruent as one might assume. Our research sought to harness the neural network capabilities behind advanced artificial intelligence in its inexorable quest to elucidate patterns and relationships. In doing so, we were able to intercept the transfer of information between these seemingly disparate domains. This paper endeavors to present the findings of our joyous jaunt through the landscape of data analysis, where the unexpected links between the whimsically crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in Greenland were laid bare for all to behold.
The interplay between historical curiosity and contemporary petrochemical predilections may appear as incongruous as a polar bear sunbathing on a tropical beach. Yet as our team delved into the depths of historical narratives and uncanny correlations, we found ourselves illuminated by the unanticipated synergies that lie latent within seemingly unrelated spheres. In this paper, we shall embark on an expedition that not only unlocks the secrets of data analysis and statistical significance but also captures the essence of discovery presented with a subtle sparkle of wit and merriment. We invite our esteemed readers to join us on this intellectual romp, as we unravel the whimsical tapestry connecting Extra History YouTube video titles and the intriguing journey of petroleum consumption in Greenland. After all, where else can one find such mirth in the seemingly mundane interplay of academic study and popular culture?
So take a deep breath, brace yourself for the inevitable surprises that lie ahead, and prepare to be regaled with the unexpected whimsy that underpins this scholarly investigation. As we delve deeper into the nexus of history, energy, and digital entertainment, we hope to reveal that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of seemingly unrelated domains can evoke a sense of awe and amusement—one that is not just Extra, but positively extraordinary.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our whimsical journey into the unprecedented connection between the insightful witticisms of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of petroleum in the ever-mysterious Greenland, we employed a methodological approach befitting the eclectic nature of our inquiry. Our research undertaking involved a medley of data collection, artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, and statistical computation – a virtual cauldron of methods that would make even the deftest of researchers raise an eyebrow in bemusement.

First and foremost, we harnessed the power of advanced AI algorithms to scour the depths of the digital realm for the most ingenious and evocative Extra History video titles spanning the years 2012 to 2021. This involved a sophisticated web-scraping operation that cast a wide net across the virtual seas, reeling in titles that not only piqued historical curiosity but also injected a dash of amusement into our every keystroke.

With a chorus of whirring processors and humming servers at our disposal, we subjected these vibrant video titles to a rigorous linguistic analysis, probing their lexical structures, semantic quirks, and latent insights. The AI models employed for this task were carefully calibrated to discern not only the superficial allure of each title but also the underlying layers of historical nuance and witty wordplay. Our aim was to distill the essence of each title, bringing to light the veritable tapestry of literary exploits and rhetorical acrobatics embedded within.

On the other side of the spectrum, we delved into the realm of energy data with the aptitude of a spelunker probing the cavernous depths of a petrochemical mine. Leveraging the reservoir of information provided by the Energy Information Administration, we gathered copious volumes of data on petroleum consumption in the enigmatic land of Greenland. This rigorous data collection process spanned the same temporal domain as our YouTube title analysis, allowing for a comprehensive alignment of the two disparate yet captivating datasets.

With our hands firmly grasping the reins of this elaborate carousel of comedic contemplation and data-driven detective work, we then proceeded to unleash the power of statistical inference and hypothesis testing. Employing a litany of mathematical tools and software, we endeavored to quantitatively unveil the correlation – no, the unbreakable bond – between the beguiling YouTube titles and the petroleum consumption figures in Greenland. Through the crucible of regression analysis and correlation coefficients, we sought to extract the robust numerical evidence that would underpin the seemingly whimsical link between history's allure and the insatiable thirst for fuel.

The collision of these idiosyncratic methodologies resulted in a climactic fusion of rigor and revelry, where the lighthearted glee of YouTube titles danced merrily with the weighty gravitas of energy consumption. It is with both fortitude and frivolity that we present the detailed findings of this methodological menagerie, hoping to inspire a sense of wonder and amusement within our esteemed readers – for in the spirited pursuit of knowledge, there is no room for solemnity alone.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9037098, r-squared of 0.8166914, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most profound insights emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. One might expect groundbreaking revelations to spring forth from meticulously conducted laboratory experiments or meticulously parsed economic data. Certainly, the notion that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could hold any sway over the consumption of petroleum in the remote and enigmatic land of Greenland might initially seem preposterous – or even "extra"ordinary. However, as the esteemed playwright Oscar Wilde once quipped, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." With this in mind, we embarked on a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration into the realm of corporate video titling and its unsuspected connection to energy consumption in the Arctic hinterlands.
The divergence between historical curiosity and contemporary energy behavior might seem as wide as the fabled rift between continental plates, but as our intrepid team would discover, the two are not as incongruent as one might assume. Our research sought to harness the neural network capabilities behind advanced artificial intelligence in its inexorable quest to elucidate patterns and relationships. In doing so, we were able to intercept the transfer of information between these seemingly disparate domains. This paper endeavors to present the findings of our joyous jaunt through the landscape of data analysis, where the unexpected links between the whimsically crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in Greenland were laid bare for all to behold.
The interplay between historical curiosity and contemporary petrochemical predilections may appear as incongruous as a polar bear sunbathing on a tropical beach. Yet as our team delved into the depths of historical narratives and uncanny correlations, we found ourselves illuminated by the unanticipated synergies that lie latent within seemingly unrelated spheres. In this paper, we shall embark on an expedition that not only unlocks the secrets of data analysis and statistical significance but also captures the essence of discovery presented with a subtle sparkle of wit and merriment. We invite our esteemed readers to join us on this intellectual romp, as we unravel the whimsical tapestry connecting Extra History YouTube video titles and the intriguing journey of petroleum consumption in Greenland. After all, where else can one find such mirth in the seemingly mundane interplay of academic study and popular culture?
So take a deep breath, brace yourself for the inevitable surprises that lie ahead, and prepare to be regaled with the unexpected whimsy that underpins this scholarly investigation. As we delve deeper into the nexus of history, energy, and digital entertainment, we hope to reveal that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of seemingly unrelated domains can evoke a sense of awe and amusement—one that is not just Extra, but positively extraordinary.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 and an r-squared value of 0.8166914 for the period from 2012 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 confidently establishes the statistical significance of this connection. These results conjure notions of a rousing journey through the spirited hinterlands of data analysis, where the unexpected synchronicity between historical intrigue and fuel consumption could best be described as "history in the making."

Indeed, as depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables. This compelling visual depiction leaves little doubt as to the discernible association between the captivating allure of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of petroleum in the Arctic environs of Greenland.

The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as they are amusing. One cannot help but pause to ponder the extraordinary interplay of digital entertainment and energy consumption, as if history itself were penning a whimsical tale of interconnectedness. It seems that even in the seemingly disparate domains of historical education and petroleum utilization, a distinct bond of influence exists, accentuating the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in unexpected ways.

In summary, the results of this study not only affirm the correlation between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of disparate spheres can yield surprising and whimsical insights. Thus, as we draw this chapter to a close, we hope this endeavor serves as a gleeful reminder that beneath the veneer of numbers and figures lies a landscape of wonder, merriment, and perhaps a touch of "extra"ordinary amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) delved into the intricacies of YouTube video titles and their potential impact on viewer engagement, laying the groundwork for our own examination of the subject. They noted the strategic use of language and the psychological effects of curiosity-inducing titles, underlining the power of a well-crafted title to captivate an audience. While their focus was on consumer behavior and marketing strategies, their findings indirectly paved the way for our investigation into the unforeseen consequences of such titling on broader societal phenomena – namely, petroleum consumption in Greenland.
Doe (2018) made strides in the realm of energy consumption patterns, exploring the multifaceted factors influencing global fuel usage. While her work primarily centered around economic and environmental variables, the interdisciplinary nature of her research inspired us to consider unconventional influences on energy demand. Her analysis of the contributing factors to petroleum consumption unwittingly set the stage for our offbeat foray into the world of online historical videos and their impact on Greenlandic fuel habits.
Jones (2020) ventured into the realm of historical narration and its role in shaping societal perceptions, setting the stage for our whimsical investigation. His examination of the influence of storytelling on cultural narratives and collective memory laid a foundation for our exploration of unexpected connections between historical curiosity and petroleum usage. Although Jones did not expressly delve into the realm of YouTube titling, his insights into the propagation of historical narratives are serendipitously intertwined with our own endeavor to uncover the playful synergy between engaging video titles and fuel consumption in Greenland.
In "The History of Petroleum in Polar Regions" by Arctic Enthusiast (2016), the author examines the historical significance of petroleum in polar environments, providing a comprehensive overview of the industry's development in regions like Greenland. While this text may not directly address the influence of YouTube titles on petroleum consumption, its insights into the historical and economic aspects of fuel in Arctic territories offer a contextual backdrop for our unconventional inquiry.
Similarly, "Frozen Tundra Tales: An Exploration of Greenlandic Folklore" by Ice Princess (2014) provides a cultural perspective on Greenlandic narratives and storytelling traditions. While the focus of this work is on folklore rather than contemporary media, it underscores the enduring power of storytelling in Greenlandic society. As we delve into the realm of historical narratives in a digital context, this exploration of traditional storytelling serves as a reminder of the enduring significance of narrative engagement in the region.
Moving away from traditional academic sources, we also ventured into the realm of popular culture for insights into historical storytelling and its impact on audience engagement. A thorough analysis of "Phineas and Ferb" episodes featuring historical escapades provided unexpected but invaluable insights into the themes and motifs that captivate audiences, fueling our broader understanding of narrative allure and its potential influence on consumer behavior – including, in our case, petroleum consumption.
The literature, thus far, has laid the foundation for our unorthodox exploration, paving the way for a lighthearted but rigorous investigation into the peculiar yet surprisingly potent connection between the captivating titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in the idiosyncratic realm of Greenland.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 and an r-squared value of 0.8166914 for the period from 2012 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 confidently establishes the statistical significance of this connection. These results conjure notions of a rousing journey through the spirited hinterlands of data analysis, where the unexpected synchronicity between historical intrigue and fuel consumption could best be described as "history in the making."
Indeed, as depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables. This compelling visual depiction leaves little doubt as to the discernible association between the captivating allure of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of petroleum in the Arctic environs of Greenland.
The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as they are amusing. One cannot help but pause to ponder the extraordinary interplay of digital entertainment and energy consumption, as if history itself were penning a whimsical tale of interconnectedness. It seems that even in the seemingly disparate domains of historical education and petroleum utilization, a distinct bond of influence exists, accentuating the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in unexpected ways.
In summary, the results of this study not only affirm the correlation between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of disparate spheres can yield surprising and whimsical insights. Thus, as we draw this chapter to a close, we hope this endeavor serves as a gleeful reminder that beneath the veneer of numbers and figures lies a landscape of wonder, merriment, and perhaps a touch of "extra"ordinary amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The evidence of the significant correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland has left us in a state of delightful disbelief. Who would have thought that the captivating allure of historical narratives could intertwine so merrily with the hum of petroleum consumption in the Arctic expanse?

Our findings not only buttress the groundwork laid by Smith et al. (2015) on the psychological effects of curiosity-inducing titles but also bring a lighthearted twist to Doe's (2018) exploration of energy consumption patterns. Additionally, our results shine a light on the unanticipated influence of historical storytelling, as hinted at by Jones (2020), and its relationship to petroleum usage. Even the subtly intertwined insights from Arctic Enthusiast's (2016) commentary on the historical significance of petroleum in polar regions and Ice Princess's (2014) exploration of Greenlandic folklore seem to converge with our own whimsical inquiry, showcasing the interconnectedness of historical narratives and societal behaviors. And let's not forget the unorthodox but strangely insightful examination of "Phineas and Ferb" episodes, which unexpectedly contributed to our understanding of narrative allure and its potential impact on consumer behavior – somewhat like a plot twist in a comic book!

The robust correlation we have discerned between the two seemingly disparate variables – historical curiosity and petroleum consumption – paints a vivid picture of the whimsical tapestry of interconnectedness that underlies human behavior. It seems that, against the backdrop of the Arctic hinterlands, even the most disjointed of phenomena find themselves in a harmonious dance of numbers and narratives.

As the dust settles on this curious correlation, we are left with a giggle and a nod to the unexpected synergies that underpin our often-peculiar world. The quirkiness of our findings serves as a fitting reminder that even in the seemingly staid realm of scholarly inquiry, there lies a playful terrain of wonder and amusement – after all, who would dare say that the world of academia lacks a "rich" sense of humor?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are and Petroluem consumption in Greenland. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is often the case that the most profound insights emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. One might expect groundbreaking revelations to spring forth from meticulously conducted laboratory experiments or meticulously parsed economic data. Certainly, the notion that the whimsical world of YouTube video titles could hold any sway over the consumption of petroleum in the remote and enigmatic land of Greenland might initially seem preposterous – or even "extra"ordinary. However, as the esteemed playwright Oscar Wilde once quipped, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." With this in mind, we embarked on a lighthearted yet rigorous exploration into the realm of corporate video titling and its unsuspected connection to energy consumption in the Arctic hinterlands.
The divergence between historical curiosity and contemporary energy behavior might seem as wide as the fabled rift between continental plates, but as our intrepid team would discover, the two are not as incongruent as one might assume. Our research sought to harness the neural network capabilities behind advanced artificial intelligence in its inexorable quest to elucidate patterns and relationships. In doing so, we were able to intercept the transfer of information between these seemingly disparate domains. This paper endeavors to present the findings of our joyous jaunt through the landscape of data analysis, where the unexpected links between the whimsically crafted titles of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of petroleum in Greenland were laid bare for all to behold.
The interplay between historical curiosity and contemporary petrochemical predilections may appear as incongruous as a polar bear sunbathing on a tropical beach. Yet as our team delved into the depths of historical narratives and uncanny correlations, we found ourselves illuminated by the unanticipated synergies that lie latent within seemingly unrelated spheres. In this paper, we shall embark on an expedition that not only unlocks the secrets of data analysis and statistical significance but also captures the essence of discovery presented with a subtle sparkle of wit and merriment. We invite our esteemed readers to join us on this intellectual romp, as we unravel the whimsical tapestry connecting Extra History YouTube video titles and the intriguing journey of petroleum consumption in Greenland. After all, where else can one find such mirth in the seemingly mundane interplay of academic study and popular culture?
So take a deep breath, brace yourself for the inevitable surprises that lie ahead, and prepare to be regaled with the unexpected whimsy that underpins this scholarly investigation. As we delve deeper into the nexus of history, energy, and digital entertainment, we hope to reveal that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of seemingly unrelated domains can evoke a sense of awe and amusement—one that is not just Extra, but positively extraordinary.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the insightfulness of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 and an r-squared value of 0.8166914 for the period from 2012 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 confidently establishes the statistical significance of this connection. These results conjure notions of a rousing journey through the spirited hinterlands of data analysis, where the unexpected synchronicity between historical intrigue and fuel consumption could best be described as "history in the making."
Indeed, as depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot vividly illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables. This compelling visual depiction leaves little doubt as to the discernible association between the captivating allure of Extra History YouTube video titles and the consumption of petroleum in the Arctic environs of Greenland.
The implications of these findings are as thought-provoking as they are amusing. One cannot help but pause to ponder the extraordinary interplay of digital entertainment and energy consumption, as if history itself were penning a whimsical tale of interconnectedness. It seems that even in the seemingly disparate domains of historical education and petroleum utilization, a distinct bond of influence exists, accentuating the idiosyncrasies of human behavior in unexpected ways.
In summary, the results of this study not only affirm the correlation between the insightful nature of Extra History YouTube video titles and petroleum consumption in Greenland but also offer a delightful reminder that even in the most unconventional of contexts, the intermingling of disparate spheres can yield surprising and whimsical insights. Thus, as we draw this chapter to a close, we hope this endeavor serves as a gleeful reminder that beneath the veneer of numbers and figures lies a landscape of wonder, merriment, and perhaps a touch of "extra"ordinary amusement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the realm of YouTube video titles and their unforeseen correlation with petroleum consumption in Greenland has proven to be a captivating odyssey, illuminating the curious interplay of historical curiosity and contemporary energy consumption. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value underscore the unexpected influence of engaging historical content on the consumption of petroleum in this remote region. It appears that the captivating allure of Extra History YouTube video titles has captured not only the attention of history enthusiasts but also seems to have intertwined itself with the patterns of fuel usage in a manner both puzzling and amusing.

The results of our study prompt us to reflect on the quirky and often enigmatic intersections between apparently unrelated domains. Who would have thought that the captivating allure of historical narratives could bear influence on the fuel preferences of an Arctic expanse? As we wrap up this scholarly escapade, it is with both a sense of astonishment and amusement that we affirm the intriguing relationship between historical edutainment and energy dynamics. As we bid adieu to this unlikely coupling, we can't help but wonder at the peculiarities that lie at the nexus of entertainment, history, and energy consumption.

With this, we assert that no further research is required in this area, and we hope our findings bring a smile to the faces of our esteemed readers. After all, it seems that even in the most unexpected of contexts, the interplay of scholarly inquiry and popular culture unveils a tapestry of wonder, amusement, and just a hint of "extra"ordinary delight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Amusing Energy and Unconventional Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Energy Studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pondering Petroleum: Perusing the Playfulness of Extra History YouTube Video Titles and Petroleum Consumption in Peculiar Greenland with an abstract of In this scholarly pursuit, we dabble in the wacky world of YouTube video titles and their aptitude for insightfulness, and their unexpected link to the consumption of petroleum in the enigmatic land of Greenland. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the Extra History YouTube video titles and tapping into the Energy Information Administration for petroleum consumption data, we embarked on an endeavor that would make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. Our findings, while initially deemed preposterous by some, revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9037098 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. The implications of this connection between historical curiosity and fuel consumption are enough to make one reevaluate the phrase "history repeats itself" – after all, who would have thought that the fate of petroleum in Greenland could be influenced by the engaging allure of engaging YouTube titles? This study isn't just about numbers – it's about the unexpected synergies that lie beneath the surface, waiting to be uncovered with a bit of lighthearted curiosity and a splash of humor. So, sit back and enjoy this academic rollercoaster – we promise, the ride is anything but "extra"ordinary.

ChatGPT:

YouTube video titles, Extra History, petroleum consumption, Greenland, correlation, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, historical curiosity, fuel consumption, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2012-2021

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are

Petroluem consumption in Greenland
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in Greenland in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in Greenland

Correlation r = 0.9037098 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8166914 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petroluem consumption in Greenland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00033. 0.0003343639885102797000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.033% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,991 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are (Insightful score (out of 10))7.85377.85197.40487.61767.77347.67217.63417.71747.54557.4884
Petroluem consumption in Greenland (Million Barrels/Day)4.258324.156763.700123.9729544.050254.053474.016163.673563.70907




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.8537,7.8519,7.4048,7.6176,7.7734,7.6721,7.6341,7.7174,7.5455,7.4884,])
array_2 = np.array([4.25832,4.15676,3.70012,3.97295,4,4.05025,4.05347,4.01616,3.67356,3.70907,])
array_1_name = "How insightful Extra History YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "Petroluem consumption in Greenland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4718 · Black Variable ID: 25782 · Red Variable ID: 24475
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0