about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,482 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Republican Senators in New York and the second variable is Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in Republican votes for Senators in New York has led to a surge in green poop queries because it appears that political preferences have become so influential that even our digestive systems are getting politically colored!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image where a New York City subway station is depicted. In the background, a large billboard displays the slogan "Votes for Republican Senators in NY," while a line of people eagerly cast their ballots. Next to it, a giant screen shows a Google search bar with the words "why do i have green poop" being typed in, as curious commuters huddle around, engaged in the surprising correlation between politics and bodily functions. The atmosphere should convey a lighthearted and humorous tone while blending these two unrelated subjects in a bustling urban setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for Republican Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic a meme Psychedelic Cute cartoon Concept art
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for Republican Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop', in the following situation: The increase in Republican votes for Senators in New York has led to a surge in green poop queries because it appears that political preferences have become so influential that even our digestive systems are getting politically colored!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling New York City subway station, a large billboard reads "Votes for Republican Senators in NY" with a line of people eagerly casting their ballots. Next to it, a giant screen displays a Google search bar with the words "why do i have green poop" being typed in, as curious commuters huddle around, engaged in the surprising correlation between politics and bodily functions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling New York City subway station, a large billboard reads "Votes for Republican Senators in NY" with a line of people eagerly casting their ballots. Next to it, a giant screen displays a Google search bar with the words "why do i have green poop" being typed in, as curious commuters huddle around, engaged in the surprising correlation between politics and bodily functions. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image where a New York City subway station is depicted. In the background, a large billboard displays the slogan "Votes for Republican Senators in NY," while a line of people eagerly cast their ballots. Next to it, a giant screen shows a Google search bar with the words "why do i have green poop" being typed in, as curious commuters huddle around, engaged in the surprising correlation between politics and bodily functions. The atmosphere should convey a lighthearted and humorous tone while blending these two unrelated subjects in a bustling urban setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Republican votes for Senators in New York caused why do i have green poop (Google searches for 'why do i have green poop') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

The Journal of Political Gastroenterology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic relationship between political preferences and peculiar human behavior has long perplexed researchers and pundits alike. And what could be more peculiar than the color of one's stool, especially when it turns a rather concerning shade of green? As strange as it may seem, this paper aims to examine the statistical connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and the inexplicable impulse of individuals to consult "Dr. Google" with queries such as "why do I have green poop?" It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? But fear not, dear reader, for our inquiry promises not to stink!

The motivation for this study stems from a curious observation that piqued our interest. While sifting through the treasure trove of data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we noticed a pattern that was as unexpected as it was, well, colorful. The correlation between red state preference and a decidedly green bodily output piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rather unconventional path of investigation. If this sounds odd, just think of it as a serendipitous fusion of political science and, dare I say, colonic science. It's a collaboration that's sure to raise some eyebrows, not to mention a few waistbands!

As academics, we are accustomed to dealing with complex and nuanced information, meticulously teasing out correlations, and drawing conclusions based on rigorous analysis. Unraveling the mysteries of human behavior is often akin to untangling a knotty problem – it requires patience, precision, and the occasional dose of humor. After all, what good is research if you can't extract a few chuckles along the way? So, pardon us if we sprinkle a bit of levity into the serious business of data exploration; after all, we're only human, and we firmly believe that a good dad joke is worth its weight in statistical significance.

Now, back to the matter at hand – the fusion of political discourse and gastrointestinal curiosities. While our initial inclination was to dismiss this correlation as a fluke, further examination revealed that it was, in fact, robust and reliable. It seems that the connection between the ballot box and the bathroom stall transcends mere coincidence and enters the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that election decisions and digestive distress could form such a compelling duo? It's a revelation that's sure to leave our fellow researchers feeling a bit green with envy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between political preferences and peculiar human behavior has long perplexed researchers and pundits alike. And what could be more peculiar than the color of one's stool, especially when it turns a rather concerning shade of green? As strange as it may seem, this paper aims to examine the statistical connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and the inexplicable impulse of individuals to consult "Dr. Google" with queries such as "why do I have green poop?" It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? But fear not, dear reader, for our inquiry promises not to stink!
The motivation for this study stems from a curious observation that piqued our interest. While sifting through the treasure trove of data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we noticed a pattern that was as unexpected as it was, well, colorful. The correlation between red state preference and a decidedly green bodily output piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rather unconventional path of investigation. If this sounds odd, just think of it as a serendipitous fusion of political science and, dare I say, colonic science. It's a collaboration that's sure to raise some eyebrows, not to mention a few waistbands!
As academics, we are accustomed to dealing with complex and nuanced information, meticulously teasing out correlations, and drawing conclusions based on rigorous analysis. Unraveling the mysteries of human behavior is often akin to untangling a knotty problem – it requires patience, precision, and the occasional dose of humor. After all, what good is research if you can't extract a few chuckles along the way? So, pardon us if we sprinkle a bit of levity into the serious business of data exploration; after all, we're only human, and we firmly believe that a good dad joke is worth its weight in statistical significance.
Now, back to the matter at hand – the fusion of political discourse and gastrointestinal curiosities. While our initial inclination was to dismiss this correlation as a fluke, further examination revealed that it was, in fact, robust and reliable. It seems that the connection between the ballot box and the bathroom stall transcends mere coincidence and enters the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that election decisions and digestive distress could form such a compelling duo? It's a revelation that's sure to leave our fellow researchers feeling a bit green with envy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Earlier studies have explored the connection between political behavior and internet search queries, demonstrating that public interest in specific health concerns can coincide with electoral events. Smith et al. (2016) found that fluctuations in Google searches for symptoms of indigestion and queasiness mirrored variations in voter turnout during midterm elections. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) discovered a linkage between searches for "stress-induced rashes" and congressional approval ratings. While these studies offer valuable insights into the intersection of politics and personal well-being, none have ventured into the uncharted territory where green ballots meet green...well, you know.

Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature,

"Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Navigating the Maze of a Modern Affliction" by Dr. Alan Greenspan,

"The Politics of the Gut: How Your Digestive System Can Swing an Election" by Jane Vote-Smith,

and "50 Shades of Green: A Biological Investigation into Peculiar Stool Colors" by Dr. Emerald Brown.

All provide tangential perspectives on the subject matter, albeit without directly addressing the correlation between Republican support and queries about unusual fecal hues. It is clear that the intersection of politics and bodily functions has been a topic of interest across various disciplines, inviting us to delve deeper into the veiled connections between the voting booth and the porcelain throne.

In the world of fiction, we encounter titles that, while not explicitly related to our research, offer intriguing parallels.

"Green Eggs and Ham" by Dr. Seuss,

"The Color Purple" by Alice Walker,

and "The Green Mile" by Stephen King.

Though these works may not shed light on the empirical relationship between political affiliations and gastrointestinal inquiries, they serve as a whimsical reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely places. After all, who wouldn't appreciate a literary allusion while pondering the complex dance between red states and green excretions?

Furthermore, our research team took a foray into the realm of children's television programs and cartoons, conducting an in-depth analysis of characters' dietary habits and bathroom-related plotlines. While this may seem like an unconventional approach, it yielded valuable insights into the ways in which popular culture shapes our perceptions of bodily functions and, by extension, our subconscious attitudes toward political representation.

In "SpongeBob SquarePants," we observed intermittent references to peculiarly colored sea creatures, prompting us to consider the potential influence of animated narratives on the public's interpretation of colorful excretions.

Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" episodes featuring digestive system escapades provided a window into the ways in which educational entertainment could both inform and mold young viewers' perceptions of bodily processes, potentially influencing their future political inclinations.

Lastly, "Arthur" presented a particularly poignant episode in which the protagonist, Arthur Read, grappled with digestive discomfort following a questionable meal, prompting his friends to embark on a comical quest for the source of his ailment. This lighthearted exploration of bodily concerns underscored the ubiquity of gastrointestinal references in children's media and their potential impact on developing attitudes toward bodily health and, by extension, political ideologies.

In synthesizing these varied sources, we are confronted with a multidimensional tapestry of influences that contribute to the intricate web of political and digestive phenomena. It is within this tapestry that we endeavor to untangle the intriguing correlation between Republican votes and inquiries about unusually hued excreta, shedding light on an aspect of human behavior that is as confounding as it is chuckle-worthy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between political preferences and peculiar human behavior has long perplexed researchers and pundits alike. And what could be more peculiar than the color of one's stool, especially when it turns a rather concerning shade of green? As strange as it may seem, this paper aims to examine the statistical connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and the inexplicable impulse of individuals to consult "Dr. Google" with queries such as "why do I have green poop?" It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? But fear not, dear reader, for our inquiry promises not to stink!
The motivation for this study stems from a curious observation that piqued our interest. While sifting through the treasure trove of data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we noticed a pattern that was as unexpected as it was, well, colorful. The correlation between red state preference and a decidedly green bodily output piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rather unconventional path of investigation. If this sounds odd, just think of it as a serendipitous fusion of political science and, dare I say, colonic science. It's a collaboration that's sure to raise some eyebrows, not to mention a few waistbands!
As academics, we are accustomed to dealing with complex and nuanced information, meticulously teasing out correlations, and drawing conclusions based on rigorous analysis. Unraveling the mysteries of human behavior is often akin to untangling a knotty problem – it requires patience, precision, and the occasional dose of humor. After all, what good is research if you can't extract a few chuckles along the way? So, pardon us if we sprinkle a bit of levity into the serious business of data exploration; after all, we're only human, and we firmly believe that a good dad joke is worth its weight in statistical significance.
Now, back to the matter at hand – the fusion of political discourse and gastrointestinal curiosities. While our initial inclination was to dismiss this correlation as a fluke, further examination revealed that it was, in fact, robust and reliable. It seems that the connection between the ballot box and the bathroom stall transcends mere coincidence and enters the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that election decisions and digestive distress could form such a compelling duo? It's a revelation that's sure to leave our fellow researchers feeling a bit green with envy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Hypothesis?

By Jove, indeed! We have a hypothesis, and it’s a fairly bold one at that. Our crackerjack team hypothesizes that there is a significant correlation between the number of Republican votes for Senators in New York and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase “why do I have green poop?” It’s a rather tantalizing juxtaposition of political proclivities and, well, intestinal perplexities, wouldn’t you say?

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To scrutinize the veracity of our hypothesis, we employed an array of rigorous research methods to ensure that our findings were as sturdy as a well-constructed political argument. Firstly, we procured data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab and Harvard Dataverse. As we sifted through the electoral numbers and polling statistics, a curious pattern began to emerge, like a hidden gem amidst the data deluge - or should we say, data 'poo-luge'? Excuse the scatological pun, but as we delve into the depths of this unconventional investigation, a dash of humor feels almost as vital as a reliable statistical model!

Next, we harnessed the formidable powers of Google Trends, where we uncovered an abundance of queries related to, shall we say, gastrointestinal unexpectedness. Our search terms included variations of "Republican votes in New York," "Senate elections," and the telltale phrase "why do I have green poop?" It’s safe to say that our research took us into some uncharted territory, or should we say "uncolonized" territory? Oh, the joys of a well-placed dad joke!

We collected data spanning the period from 2004 to 2018, encompassing multiple election cycles and an assortment of fecal inquiries. The time frame enabled us to capture the flux and sway of political allegiances while also tracking the ebb and flow of, well, gastrointestinal unease.

Employing advanced statistical analyses, such as regression modeling and time-series data examination, we sought to unravel the intricate dance between political proclivities and peculiar medical queries. The statistical models were as robust as an incumbent Senator’s re-election campaign, undergoing meticulous scrutiny to ensure their validity and reliability. It's a messy business, this statistical exploration, and what better way to navigate it than with a few laughs and well-timed jests?

Furthermore, we implemented controls for various potential confounding variables, such as regional patterns of internet usage, and adjusted for temporal lags to account for any delayed effects between senatorial votes and, well, green contemplations. After all, we couldn’t afford to let any statistical leavings contaminate our findings!

Conclusively, our research methodology was as robust and meticulous as a chef crafting the perfect recipe – albeit one with a rather offbeat assortment of ingredients. Nonetheless, we forged ahead with determination and a strong stomach, ready to dish out our findings with academic rigor and a dollop of good old-fashioned toilet humor.

This methodology reflects our commitment to thorough investigation and statistical precision, ensuring that our study into this unique interplay between political inclinations and bodily revelations stands on solid scientific ground. After all, it takes more than a few raised eyebrows to deter us from pursuing a curious connection – especially when it involves such a colorful combination of voters and, dare we say, votaries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8457135, r-squared of 0.7152313, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic relationship between political preferences and peculiar human behavior has long perplexed researchers and pundits alike. And what could be more peculiar than the color of one's stool, especially when it turns a rather concerning shade of green? As strange as it may seem, this paper aims to examine the statistical connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and the inexplicable impulse of individuals to consult "Dr. Google" with queries such as "why do I have green poop?" It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? But fear not, dear reader, for our inquiry promises not to stink!
The motivation for this study stems from a curious observation that piqued our interest. While sifting through the treasure trove of data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we noticed a pattern that was as unexpected as it was, well, colorful. The correlation between red state preference and a decidedly green bodily output piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rather unconventional path of investigation. If this sounds odd, just think of it as a serendipitous fusion of political science and, dare I say, colonic science. It's a collaboration that's sure to raise some eyebrows, not to mention a few waistbands!
As academics, we are accustomed to dealing with complex and nuanced information, meticulously teasing out correlations, and drawing conclusions based on rigorous analysis. Unraveling the mysteries of human behavior is often akin to untangling a knotty problem – it requires patience, precision, and the occasional dose of humor. After all, what good is research if you can't extract a few chuckles along the way? So, pardon us if we sprinkle a bit of levity into the serious business of data exploration; after all, we're only human, and we firmly believe that a good dad joke is worth its weight in statistical significance.
Now, back to the matter at hand – the fusion of political discourse and gastrointestinal curiosities. While our initial inclination was to dismiss this correlation as a fluke, further examination revealed that it was, in fact, robust and reliable. It seems that the connection between the ballot box and the bathroom stall transcends mere coincidence and enters the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that election decisions and digestive distress could form such a compelling duo? It's a revelation that's sure to leave our fellow researchers feeling a bit green with envy!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation unveiled a striking and, dare I say, gut-wrenching correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." The Pearson correlation coefficient calculated to be 0.8457135, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Not to be too crass, but it seems that political leanings and peculiar bowel movements went hand in hand, or should I say, "cheek to cheek."

The r-squared value of 0.7152313 further underscored the robustness of this connection, suggesting that approximately 71.5% of the variability in green poop queries could be explained by the Republican vote share. Now that's what I call a bowel-load of information!

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This finding left us feeling rather flushed with excitement, as it solidified our contention that there was indeed a substantive link between political affiliations and, well, colorful concerns of a digestive nature.

Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the correlation between Republican votes and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." As you can see, the data points adhere to a clear, upward trajectory, akin to an election campaign on an upward swing. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as strong as the bond between a politican and a handshake.

Overall, our results not only illuminated an unexpected connection between political behavior and bio-physiological queries but also underscored the potential for interdisciplinary research to yield, let's say, surprisingly colorful outcomes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Earlier studies have explored the connection between political behavior and internet search queries, demonstrating that public interest in specific health concerns can coincide with electoral events. Smith et al. (2016) found that fluctuations in Google searches for symptoms of indigestion and queasiness mirrored variations in voter turnout during midterm elections. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) discovered a linkage between searches for "stress-induced rashes" and congressional approval ratings. While these studies offer valuable insights into the intersection of politics and personal well-being, none have ventured into the uncharted territory where green ballots meet green...well, you know.
Turning to the realm of popular non-fiction literature,
"Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Navigating the Maze of a Modern Affliction" by Dr. Alan Greenspan,
"The Politics of the Gut: How Your Digestive System Can Swing an Election" by Jane Vote-Smith,
and "50 Shades of Green: A Biological Investigation into Peculiar Stool Colors" by Dr. Emerald Brown.
All provide tangential perspectives on the subject matter, albeit without directly addressing the correlation between Republican support and queries about unusual fecal hues. It is clear that the intersection of politics and bodily functions has been a topic of interest across various disciplines, inviting us to delve deeper into the veiled connections between the voting booth and the porcelain throne.
In the world of fiction, we encounter titles that, while not explicitly related to our research, offer intriguing parallels.
"Green Eggs and Ham" by Dr. Seuss,
"The Color Purple" by Alice Walker,
and "The Green Mile" by Stephen King.
Though these works may not shed light on the empirical relationship between political affiliations and gastrointestinal inquiries, they serve as a whimsical reminder that unexpected connections can be found in the most unlikely places. After all, who wouldn't appreciate a literary allusion while pondering the complex dance between red states and green excretions?
Furthermore, our research team took a foray into the realm of children's television programs and cartoons, conducting an in-depth analysis of characters' dietary habits and bathroom-related plotlines. While this may seem like an unconventional approach, it yielded valuable insights into the ways in which popular culture shapes our perceptions of bodily functions and, by extension, our subconscious attitudes toward political representation.
In "SpongeBob SquarePants," we observed intermittent references to peculiarly colored sea creatures, prompting us to consider the potential influence of animated narratives on the public's interpretation of colorful excretions.
Similarly, "The Magic School Bus" episodes featuring digestive system escapades provided a window into the ways in which educational entertainment could both inform and mold young viewers' perceptions of bodily processes, potentially influencing their future political inclinations.
Lastly, "Arthur" presented a particularly poignant episode in which the protagonist, Arthur Read, grappled with digestive discomfort following a questionable meal, prompting his friends to embark on a comical quest for the source of his ailment. This lighthearted exploration of bodily concerns underscored the ubiquity of gastrointestinal references in children's media and their potential impact on developing attitudes toward bodily health and, by extension, political ideologies.
In synthesizing these varied sources, we are confronted with a multidimensional tapestry of influences that contribute to the intricate web of political and digestive phenomena. It is within this tapestry that we endeavor to untangle the intriguing correlation between Republican votes and inquiries about unusually hued excreta, shedding light on an aspect of human behavior that is as confounding as it is chuckle-worthy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a striking and, dare I say, gut-wrenching correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." The Pearson correlation coefficient calculated to be 0.8457135, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Not to be too crass, but it seems that political leanings and peculiar bowel movements went hand in hand, or should I say, "cheek to cheek."
The r-squared value of 0.7152313 further underscored the robustness of this connection, suggesting that approximately 71.5% of the variability in green poop queries could be explained by the Republican vote share. Now that's what I call a bowel-load of information!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This finding left us feeling rather flushed with excitement, as it solidified our contention that there was indeed a substantive link between political affiliations and, well, colorful concerns of a digestive nature.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the correlation between Republican votes and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." As you can see, the data points adhere to a clear, upward trajectory, akin to an election campaign on an upward swing. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as strong as the bond between a politican and a handshake.
Overall, our results not only illuminated an unexpected connection between political behavior and bio-physiological queries but also underscored the potential for interdisciplinary research to yield, let's say, surprisingly colorful outcomes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research uncovered a rather revealing link between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for "why do I have green poop". While at first glance, these two variables seem about as unrelated as a tummy ache and a tax return, our results supported prior research findings related to the intertwining of political activity and public health concerns. As unexpected as it may seem, the correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 we unearthed echoed previous studies that noted connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to political leanings and gastrointestinal inquiries, the data wasn't just passing gas—the relationship was as solid as a well-constructed hypothesis.

Our findings align with Smith et al. (2016) and Doe and Jones (2018), who similarly discovered intriguing parallels between voter behavior and health-related internet searches. While it may sound like a downright colonundrum, the pattern we observed falls in line with the wider body of literature exploring these unanticipated correlations. Our study, with its unmistakable tie between green ballots and green bowel movements, demonstrated that even the most outlandish hypotheses can lead to...shall we say, substantial results.

Moreover, our foray into the world of children's television and popular literature, although seemingly humorous at first glance, lent additional credence to our findings. Just as in our research, where we discovered a surprising correlation between Republican votes and peculiar poop queries, popular fiction and children's programming also contained elements that were unexpectedly aligned with our data. These diverse sources, taken together, highlighted the multifaceted influences that can shape human behavior, including the intersection of political choices and...intestinal inquisitions.

In conclusion, our work offers fresh insights into the ways in which political decisions might be intertwined with the public's concerns about intestinal irregularities. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic relationship between political affiliations and unusual...shall we say, digestive discoveries, we are reminded that science and statistics can often lead us to the most surprising, and occasionally humorous, conclusions. After all, who knew that delving into political ballots and peculiar bowel movements would lead to such, ahem, moving results?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic relationship between political preferences and peculiar human behavior has long perplexed researchers and pundits alike. And what could be more peculiar than the color of one's stool, especially when it turns a rather concerning shade of green? As strange as it may seem, this paper aims to examine the statistical connection between Republican votes for Senators in New York and the inexplicable impulse of individuals to consult "Dr. Google" with queries such as "why do I have green poop?" It's a bit of a head-scratcher, isn't it? But fear not, dear reader, for our inquiry promises not to stink!
The motivation for this study stems from a curious observation that piqued our interest. While sifting through the treasure trove of data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we noticed a pattern that was as unexpected as it was, well, colorful. The correlation between red state preference and a decidedly green bodily output piqued our scholarly interest, leading us down a rather unconventional path of investigation. If this sounds odd, just think of it as a serendipitous fusion of political science and, dare I say, colonic science. It's a collaboration that's sure to raise some eyebrows, not to mention a few waistbands!
As academics, we are accustomed to dealing with complex and nuanced information, meticulously teasing out correlations, and drawing conclusions based on rigorous analysis. Unraveling the mysteries of human behavior is often akin to untangling a knotty problem – it requires patience, precision, and the occasional dose of humor. After all, what good is research if you can't extract a few chuckles along the way? So, pardon us if we sprinkle a bit of levity into the serious business of data exploration; after all, we're only human, and we firmly believe that a good dad joke is worth its weight in statistical significance.
Now, back to the matter at hand – the fusion of political discourse and gastrointestinal curiosities. While our initial inclination was to dismiss this correlation as a fluke, further examination revealed that it was, in fact, robust and reliable. It seems that the connection between the ballot box and the bathroom stall transcends mere coincidence and enters the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that election decisions and digestive distress could form such a compelling duo? It's a revelation that's sure to leave our fellow researchers feeling a bit green with envy!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a striking and, dare I say, gut-wrenching correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." The Pearson correlation coefficient calculated to be 0.8457135, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Not to be too crass, but it seems that political leanings and peculiar bowel movements went hand in hand, or should I say, "cheek to cheek."
The r-squared value of 0.7152313 further underscored the robustness of this connection, suggesting that approximately 71.5% of the variability in green poop queries could be explained by the Republican vote share. Now that's what I call a bowel-load of information!
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.05 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation was unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This finding left us feeling rather flushed with excitement, as it solidified our contention that there was indeed a substantive link between political affiliations and, well, colorful concerns of a digestive nature.
Fig. 1 presents a visual representation of the correlation between Republican votes and Google searches for "why do I have green poop." As you can see, the data points adhere to a clear, upward trajectory, akin to an election campaign on an upward swing. One could even say that the relationship between these variables is as strong as the bond between a politican and a handshake.
Overall, our results not only illuminated an unexpected connection between political behavior and bio-physiological queries but also underscored the potential for interdisciplinary research to yield, let's say, surprisingly colorful outcomes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unraveled a captivating correlation between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop.' It's safe to say that our findings have left us feeling green with statistical significance! The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 value provide compelling evidence to support our contention that there is indeed a substantive link between political affiliations and colorful concerns of a digestive nature - proving that in the world of statistics, even poop can hold significant value. It seems that even in the realm of research, the unexpected can lead to some truly fascinating discoveries.

Our results underscore the startling ways in which political decisions may be intertwined with the public's quirky gastrointestinal queries, shaping a new perspective on the intersection of politics and bodily functions. Now that's what I call a political "movement"! One could even say that our findings "stool" the show, demonstrating the depth and breadth of unconventional correlations existing in the human experience.

As with any research, there are limitations to consider and much more to explore in this peculiar area of inquiry. That being said, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already spent enough time looking into this "crappy" connection between Republican votes and green poop queries!

In the words of a true statistician, "May the odds be ever in your favor, and may your stool colors remain within the normal distribution!" With that said, this paper concludes on a note of statistical merriment and colorful curiosity.

And remember, always approach statistical significance with caution – never take it at face value, especially when it comes to matters of...unusual coloration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Gastroenterology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Political and Gastrointestinal Research (IQPGR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Red State Tales: Republican Ballots and Green Poop Queries in the Empire State with an abstract of This paper delves into the intriguing relationship between Republican votes for Senators in New York and Google searches for 'why do I have green poop'. Utilizing data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends, our research team uncovered a striking correlation between these seemingly unrelated trends. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8457135 and p < 0.05 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2018, proving the connection beyond a shadow of a doubt. As we delved into this rather unsavory topic, it became clear that the data were anything but....wait for it...unsubstantiated! Our analysis sheds light on the surprising ways in which political decisions might be linked to the public's gastrointestinal concerns. So, what a relief it is to see the data unbowelled before us!

ChatGPT:

Republican votes, Senators, New York, Google searches, green poop, correlation, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Google Trends, political decisions, gastrointestinal concerns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Republican Senators in New York
Detailed data title: Percentage of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in New York
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in New York

Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'

Correlation r = 0.8457135 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7152313 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'why do i have green poop') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in New York) over the 6 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.034. 0.0338701616417978700000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 3.4% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 30 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.11, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420062010201220162018
Votes for Republican Senators in New York (Percentage of votes)21.819425.80354.150521.283222.099628.578
Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' (Rel. search volume)12.166718.083340.416724.58331112.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21.8194,25.803,54.1505,21.2832,22.0996,28.578,])
array_2 = np.array([12.1667,18.0833,40.4167,24.5833,11,12.5,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in New York"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'why do i have green poop'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 5482 · Black Variable ID: 26436 · Red Variable ID: 1539
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0