about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,550 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People needed a way to cope with the emotional rollercoaster of historical events, so they turned to cooking as a form of stress relief. As a result, the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrocketed every time a new Extra History video was released, leading to nationwide culinary creative reenactments of past civilizations.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A photo-realistic image] In a lively kitchen, a diverse group of people gather around a massive screen, engrossed in the latest Extra History YouTube video. As the video reaches its peak, the Total views count on the screen surges, and simultaneously, the chefs in the kitchen rush to use Liquefied Petroleum Gas to whip up historical delicacies. The aroma of sizzling spices fills the air as the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrockets. Throughout the nation, individuals partake in creative culinary reenactments of past civilizations, serving as a means of emotional release amidst the upheavals of history. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation A photo-realistic image Parallax art Cute cartoon Surrealism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom, in the following situation: People needed a way to cope with the emotional rollercoaster of historical events, so they turned to cooking as a form of stress relief. As a result, the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrocketed every time a new Extra History video was released, leading to nationwide culinary creative reenactments of past civilizations.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling kitchen, a group of people are gathered around a large screen, watching the latest Extra History YouTube video. As the video reaches its climax, the Total views count on the screen spikes, and at the same time, the chefs in the kitchen are hurriedly using Liquefied Petroleum Gas to cook up historical delicacies. The smell of sizzling spices fills the air as the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrockets, and people engage in nationwide culinary creative reenactments of past civilizations to cope with the emotional rollercoaster of historical events.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling kitchen, a group of people are gathered around a large screen, watching the latest Extra History YouTube video. As the video reaches its climax, the Total views count on the screen spikes, and at the same time, the chefs in the kitchen are hurriedly using Liquefied Petroleum Gas to cook up historical delicacies. The smell of sizzling spices fills the air as the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrockets, and people engage in nationwide culinary creative reenactments of past civilizations to cope with the emotional rollercoaster of historical events. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A photo-realistic image] In a lively kitchen, a diverse group of people gather around a massive screen, engrossed in the latest Extra History YouTube video. As the video reaches its peak, the Total views count on the screen surges, and simultaneously, the chefs in the kitchen rush to use Liquefied Petroleum Gas to whip up historical delicacies. The aroma of sizzling spices fills the air as the demand for LPG in the United Kingdom skyrockets. Throughout the nation, individuals partake in creative culinary reenactments of past civilizations, serving as a means of emotional release amidst the upheavals of history.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Total views on Extra History YouTube videos positively influenced Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

The International Journal of Digital Culture and Transcontinental Energy Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9127136 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The realm of digital media and energy consumption may seem to exist in separate universes, like two ships passing in the night, or more aptly put, two British ships making their way across the Atlantic. However, as we peer into the swirling vortex of data and statistics, a peculiar correlation emerges, akin to finding an unexpected treasure map amongst the vast digital expanse.

As we delve into this seemingly incongruous tango between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, we wade into uncharted waters, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering hidden connections. The juxtaposition of these phenomena raises eyebrows and elicits quizzical looks, much like a historian stumbling upon a peculiar footnote in an ancient manuscript.

While the idea of linking the musings of history enthusiasts with the daily habits of LPG consumers may initially invoke a raised eyebrow or a perplexed chuckle, our diligent analysis and charting of trends have revealed a captivating correlation that demands further scrutiny, much like an elusive historical enigma waiting to be deciphered.

So, as we prepare to set sail on our scholarly expedition, envision the fusion of whimsy and intellectual rigor, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles with the mirth of unexpected connections. Join us as we navigate the tumultuous seas of data analysis and embark on an expedition into the untamed waters of digital entertainment and energy trends.

Let us unravel the enthralling tale of history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and ponder the implications of such a captivating confluence in our modern world. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scholarly journey that teeters on the edge of hilarity and insight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of digital media and energy consumption may seem to exist in separate universes, like two ships passing in the night, or more aptly put, two British ships making their way across the Atlantic. However, as we peer into the swirling vortex of data and statistics, a peculiar correlation emerges, akin to finding an unexpected treasure map amongst the vast digital expanse.
As we delve into this seemingly incongruous tango between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, we wade into uncharted waters, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering hidden connections. The juxtaposition of these phenomena raises eyebrows and elicits quizzical looks, much like a historian stumbling upon a peculiar footnote in an ancient manuscript.
While the idea of linking the musings of history enthusiasts with the daily habits of LPG consumers may initially invoke a raised eyebrow or a perplexed chuckle, our diligent analysis and charting of trends have revealed a captivating correlation that demands further scrutiny, much like an elusive historical enigma waiting to be deciphered.
So, as we prepare to set sail on our scholarly expedition, envision the fusion of whimsy and intellectual rigor, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles with the mirth of unexpected connections. Join us as we navigate the tumultuous seas of data analysis and embark on an expedition into the untamed waters of digital entertainment and energy trends.
Let us unravel the enthralling tale of history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and ponder the implications of such a captivating confluence in our modern world. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scholarly journey that teeters on the edge of hilarity and insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In considering the curious correlation between Extra History YouTube video views and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in the United Kingdom, it is imperative to explore existing literature on digital media consumption, historical fascination, and energy usage trends. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of internet user behavior and identified a growing interest in historically themed digital content, particularly among younger demographics. This finding aligns with the notion that Extra History, with its animated retellings of historical events, has captivated a dedicated audience within the YouTube sphere.

Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the intricacies of energy consumption patterns across different regions in their seminal work. While their focus was not explicitly on historical education videos, their insights shed light on the diverse factors influencing energy usage, underscoring the complexity of consumption trends. The juxtaposition of these serious scholarly works with the seemingly farcical link between YouTube history buffs and LPG users sets the stage for a delightful academic romp through the literature.

Turning to the realm of historical non-fiction, "The History of Gas: A Comprehensive Study" by Green (2017) may seem at first glance to be a fitting foray into understanding the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas. However, upon closer inspection, Green’s work primarily delves into the evolution and usage of natural gas over centuries, rather than specifically addressing LPG in the context of online historical content.

On a related note, the fiction book "Gaslight Mysteries: Tales of Intrigue" by Redfield (2015) could potentially hold obscure connections to our inquiry. Although these mysteries likely shed little light on the relationship between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers, they offer a charming diversion into the realm of gas-related fictitious adventures.

And who could forget the classic board game "Gas Out Expansion Pack: History Edition," where players race to expel gas (both of the bodily and non-renewable energy variety) in a historical context? While not directly related to our study, this lighthearted game encapsulates the spirit of unexpected connections and whimsical pursuits, much like our scholarly expedition.

With this multifaceted backdrop, we step into the vibrant world of literature and media, poised to unravel the tangled threads connecting YouTube history enthusiasts and LPG connoisseurs. The stage is set for an academic escapade that promises to both entertain and enlighten, akin to navigating a historical labyrinth in search of a cheeky punchline.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of digital media and energy consumption may seem to exist in separate universes, like two ships passing in the night, or more aptly put, two British ships making their way across the Atlantic. However, as we peer into the swirling vortex of data and statistics, a peculiar correlation emerges, akin to finding an unexpected treasure map amongst the vast digital expanse.
As we delve into this seemingly incongruous tango between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, we wade into uncharted waters, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering hidden connections. The juxtaposition of these phenomena raises eyebrows and elicits quizzical looks, much like a historian stumbling upon a peculiar footnote in an ancient manuscript.
While the idea of linking the musings of history enthusiasts with the daily habits of LPG consumers may initially invoke a raised eyebrow or a perplexed chuckle, our diligent analysis and charting of trends have revealed a captivating correlation that demands further scrutiny, much like an elusive historical enigma waiting to be deciphered.
So, as we prepare to set sail on our scholarly expedition, envision the fusion of whimsy and intellectual rigor, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles with the mirth of unexpected connections. Join us as we navigate the tumultuous seas of data analysis and embark on an expedition into the untamed waters of digital entertainment and energy trends.
Let us unravel the enthralling tale of history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and ponder the implications of such a captivating confluence in our modern world. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scholarly journey that teeters on the edge of hilarity and insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic correlation between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the utilization of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, our research team implemented a hodgepodge of data collection and analysis techniques, akin to an eclectic recipe for scholarly stew.

First and foremost, we harnessed the power of YouTube analytics, navigating the treacherous terrain of digital content platforms to harvest a bountiful crop of viewer statistics. We meticulously documented the total views accrued by Extra History videos, taking care to differentiate between views from history aficionados and accidental clicks from perplexed passersby. Much like diligent historians poring over ancient texts, we sifted through the virtual annals of YouTube to extract the precious data essential to our expedition.

Simultaneously, we ventured into the labyrinth of fuel consumption data, relying on the auspices of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) as our guiding beacon in the tempest of energy statistics. We ferreted out the intricate details of LPG usage in the United Kingdom, navigating through a sea of spreadsheets and databases, akin to intrepid sailors charting a course through uncharted waters. With unwavering determination, we tallied the barrels of LPG consumed, accounting for fluctuations in demand and market dynamics with the astuteness of seasoned financial buccaneers.

Having amassed these disparate troves of data, we deployed the formidable weaponry of statistical analysis to scrutinize and dissect the numerical tapestries before us. Through the venerable technique of multiple regression analysis, we endeavored to unearth the hidden threads of correlation, much like ambitious treasure hunters delving into the cryptic clues of an ancient map.

Applying the tools of the trade, including correlation coefficients and p-values, we plumbed the depths of the data, sieving out spurious connections and confounding variables with the finesse of keen-eyed detectives unraveling a complex historical mystery. Our meticulous approach aimed to weed out mere coincidences and spurious relationships, bolstering the credibility of our findings and fortifying the scholarly foundation of our expedition.

In summary, our research methodology harnessed the synergistic forces of digital analytics, energy data excavation, and statistical scrutiny to excavate the unanticipated ties between YouTube history enthusiasts and LPG consumers, offering a wry yet scholarly foray into the confluence of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, behold the tale of methodological ingenuity, where the pursuit of knowledge melds with the whimsy of unexpected connections, and where intellectual rigor dances a jocular jig with the quirks of modern society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9127136, r-squared of 0.8330461, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The realm of digital media and energy consumption may seem to exist in separate universes, like two ships passing in the night, or more aptly put, two British ships making their way across the Atlantic. However, as we peer into the swirling vortex of data and statistics, a peculiar correlation emerges, akin to finding an unexpected treasure map amongst the vast digital expanse.
As we delve into this seemingly incongruous tango between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, we wade into uncharted waters, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering hidden connections. The juxtaposition of these phenomena raises eyebrows and elicits quizzical looks, much like a historian stumbling upon a peculiar footnote in an ancient manuscript.
While the idea of linking the musings of history enthusiasts with the daily habits of LPG consumers may initially invoke a raised eyebrow or a perplexed chuckle, our diligent analysis and charting of trends have revealed a captivating correlation that demands further scrutiny, much like an elusive historical enigma waiting to be deciphered.
So, as we prepare to set sail on our scholarly expedition, envision the fusion of whimsy and intellectual rigor, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles with the mirth of unexpected connections. Join us as we navigate the tumultuous seas of data analysis and embark on an expedition into the untamed waters of digital entertainment and energy trends.
Let us unravel the enthralling tale of history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and ponder the implications of such a captivating confluence in our modern world. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scholarly journey that teeters on the edge of hilarity and insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between Total Views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in the United Kingdom during the period of 2012 to 2022 yielded some unexpectedly entwined outcomes. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9127136 suggests a remarkably robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. A notable R-squared value of 0.8330461 further strengthens the evidence of a strong linear relationship, leaving us pondering the possibility of YouTube views practically fueling the LPG market.

As humorously unexpected as it may seem, the observational data presents a compelling case for the interplay between historical narratives and the domestic use of LPG. It’s as if the views on Extra History YouTube videos were casting a historical shadow over the consumption patterns of LPG in UK households, almost like a historical reenactment taking place in the kitchen.

Figure 1, the scatterplot visual representation of our findings, vividly demonstrates the striking correlation between Extra History YouTube views and LPG consumption. The data points are as tightly bound as a good plot twist, leaving one to wonder if delving into ancient empires online leads to a propensity for gas-powered gastronomy in the physical world. It seems the voyages of historical wisdom on YouTube have steered the course of LPG usage in a manner that not even the most seasoned historian could have predicted.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between YouTube views and LPG consumption. As shocking as it may be, it appears that the musings of history enthusiasts have wielded a palpable impact on the energetics of daily life, much like a time-traveling excursion through the annals of British domestic energy habits.

The findings of this study underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the digital era, where historical enlightenment can inadvertently influence domestic energy choices. As we navigate the uncharted waters of data analysis, this unexpected tango between history buffs and gas aficionados showcases the intriguing, and occasionally ludicrous, confluences that can arise in the realm of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In considering the curious correlation between Extra History YouTube video views and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in the United Kingdom, it is imperative to explore existing literature on digital media consumption, historical fascination, and energy usage trends. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of internet user behavior and identified a growing interest in historically themed digital content, particularly among younger demographics. This finding aligns with the notion that Extra History, with its animated retellings of historical events, has captivated a dedicated audience within the YouTube sphere.
Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the intricacies of energy consumption patterns across different regions in their seminal work. While their focus was not explicitly on historical education videos, their insights shed light on the diverse factors influencing energy usage, underscoring the complexity of consumption trends. The juxtaposition of these serious scholarly works with the seemingly farcical link between YouTube history buffs and LPG users sets the stage for a delightful academic romp through the literature.
Turning to the realm of historical non-fiction, "The History of Gas: A Comprehensive Study" by Green (2017) may seem at first glance to be a fitting foray into understanding the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas. However, upon closer inspection, Green’s work primarily delves into the evolution and usage of natural gas over centuries, rather than specifically addressing LPG in the context of online historical content.
On a related note, the fiction book "Gaslight Mysteries: Tales of Intrigue" by Redfield (2015) could potentially hold obscure connections to our inquiry. Although these mysteries likely shed little light on the relationship between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers, they offer a charming diversion into the realm of gas-related fictitious adventures.
And who could forget the classic board game "Gas Out Expansion Pack: History Edition," where players race to expel gas (both of the bodily and non-renewable energy variety) in a historical context? While not directly related to our study, this lighthearted game encapsulates the spirit of unexpected connections and whimsical pursuits, much like our scholarly expedition.
With this multifaceted backdrop, we step into the vibrant world of literature and media, poised to unravel the tangled threads connecting YouTube history enthusiasts and LPG connoisseurs. The stage is set for an academic escapade that promises to both entertain and enlighten, akin to navigating a historical labyrinth in search of a cheeky punchline.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between Total Views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in the United Kingdom during the period of 2012 to 2022 yielded some unexpectedly entwined outcomes. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9127136 suggests a remarkably robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. A notable R-squared value of 0.8330461 further strengthens the evidence of a strong linear relationship, leaving us pondering the possibility of YouTube views practically fueling the LPG market.
As humorously unexpected as it may seem, the observational data presents a compelling case for the interplay between historical narratives and the domestic use of LPG. It’s as if the views on Extra History YouTube videos were casting a historical shadow over the consumption patterns of LPG in UK households, almost like a historical reenactment taking place in the kitchen.
Figure 1, the scatterplot visual representation of our findings, vividly demonstrates the striking correlation between Extra History YouTube views and LPG consumption. The data points are as tightly bound as a good plot twist, leaving one to wonder if delving into ancient empires online leads to a propensity for gas-powered gastronomy in the physical world. It seems the voyages of historical wisdom on YouTube have steered the course of LPG usage in a manner that not even the most seasoned historian could have predicted.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between YouTube views and LPG consumption. As shocking as it may be, it appears that the musings of history enthusiasts have wielded a palpable impact on the energetics of daily life, much like a time-traveling excursion through the annals of British domestic energy habits.
The findings of this study underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the digital era, where historical enlightenment can inadvertently influence domestic energy choices. As we navigate the uncharted waters of data analysis, this unexpected tango between history buffs and gas aficionados showcases the intriguing, and occasionally ludicrous, confluences that can arise in the realm of scholarly investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study provide compelling evidence for the surprising interplay between Extra History YouTube views and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in the United Kingdom. While the initial hypothesis of a connection between historical video consumption and household energy usage may have seemed whimsical, our findings present a robust case for the tangential relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. It's as if the past is coming back to gasp at our modern energy choices, prompting a historical gasp, if you will.

Our research corroborates the work of Smith et al. (2018), who highlighted the growing interest in historically themed digital content, particularly among younger demographics. The robust positive correlation uncovered in our analysis supports the notion that the captivating allure of historical narratives within the realms of online videos can wield a palpable influence on energy consumption patterns. It's like a digital domino effect, where a click leads to a flicker of a gas stove – history in the making, indeed.

Additionally, our findings align with the intricate insights of Doe and Jones (2019) into energy consumption patterns across different regions. While their focus was not explicitly on historical education videos, our results amplify the intricate web of factors influencing energy usage, with online historical content emerging as an unexpected yet influential thread in the tapestry of energy choices. It's like a historical eureka moment, where the past and present collide in the kitchen.

Digging deeper into the literature, the unexpected revelations from our study shed light on the comedic yet consequential interplay between seemingly unrelated spheres of interest. Just as "Gaslight Mysteries: Tales of Intrigue" by Redfield (2015) may have seemed like a lighthearted diversion, the unexpected tie we've uncovered between Extra History YouTube views and LPG consumption unveils an intriguing narrative of its own. Who knew that the whimsical world of gas-related fiction could hold a kernel of truth about real-world energy use?

In essence, our findings not only validate but also illuminate the surprising yet impactful connections that exist within the realms of digital media and energy consumption. As we stroll through the labyrinth of data, it becomes clear that the seemingly farcical connection between history buffs and LPG users isn't just a comedic happenstance; it's a tangible, statistically supported phenomenon. It's as if the digital peeks into the past are igniting a flame of influence that reverberates through the very fabric of domestic energy choices.

The results of this study serve as a testament to the delightful unpredictability that can emerge from scholarly pursuits, where the seemingly incongruous can coalesce into a symphony of unexpected revelations. As we unravel the unanticipated ties between history enthusiasts and gas connoisseurs, we are left with a lighthearted yet thought-provoking mosaic of connections that challenges traditional boundaries of academic inquiry. After all, who knew that the annals of British domestic energy habits could be influenced by the musings of online history enthusiasts? It's a historical twist that even the most cunning of storytellers couldn't have concocted.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The realm of digital media and energy consumption may seem to exist in separate universes, like two ships passing in the night, or more aptly put, two British ships making their way across the Atlantic. However, as we peer into the swirling vortex of data and statistics, a peculiar correlation emerges, akin to finding an unexpected treasure map amongst the vast digital expanse.
As we delve into this seemingly incongruous tango between the total views of Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom, we wade into uncharted waters, armed with curiosity and a penchant for uncovering hidden connections. The juxtaposition of these phenomena raises eyebrows and elicits quizzical looks, much like a historian stumbling upon a peculiar footnote in an ancient manuscript.
While the idea of linking the musings of history enthusiasts with the daily habits of LPG consumers may initially invoke a raised eyebrow or a perplexed chuckle, our diligent analysis and charting of trends have revealed a captivating correlation that demands further scrutiny, much like an elusive historical enigma waiting to be deciphered.
So, as we prepare to set sail on our scholarly expedition, envision the fusion of whimsy and intellectual rigor, where the pursuit of knowledge mingles with the mirth of unexpected connections. Join us as we navigate the tumultuous seas of data analysis and embark on an expedition into the untamed waters of digital entertainment and energy trends.
Let us unravel the enthralling tale of history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and ponder the implications of such a captivating confluence in our modern world. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for a scholarly journey that teeters on the edge of hilarity and insight.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between Total Views on Extra History YouTube videos and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in the United Kingdom during the period of 2012 to 2022 yielded some unexpectedly entwined outcomes. The Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9127136 suggests a remarkably robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. A notable R-squared value of 0.8330461 further strengthens the evidence of a strong linear relationship, leaving us pondering the possibility of YouTube views practically fueling the LPG market.
As humorously unexpected as it may seem, the observational data presents a compelling case for the interplay between historical narratives and the domestic use of LPG. It’s as if the views on Extra History YouTube videos were casting a historical shadow over the consumption patterns of LPG in UK households, almost like a historical reenactment taking place in the kitchen.
Figure 1, the scatterplot visual representation of our findings, vividly demonstrates the striking correlation between Extra History YouTube views and LPG consumption. The data points are as tightly bound as a good plot twist, leaving one to wonder if delving into ancient empires online leads to a propensity for gas-powered gastronomy in the physical world. It seems the voyages of historical wisdom on YouTube have steered the course of LPG usage in a manner that not even the most seasoned historian could have predicted.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence against the null hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between YouTube views and LPG consumption. As shocking as it may be, it appears that the musings of history enthusiasts have wielded a palpable impact on the energetics of daily life, much like a time-traveling excursion through the annals of British domestic energy habits.
The findings of this study underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the digital era, where historical enlightenment can inadvertently influence domestic energy choices. As we navigate the uncharted waters of data analysis, this unexpected tango between history buffs and gas aficionados showcases the intriguing, and occasionally ludicrous, confluences that can arise in the realm of scholarly investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our scholarly expedition into the intertwining twirl of Extra History YouTube views and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) consumption in the United Kingdom has left us with a treasure trove of captivating findings. What began as a whimsical pursuit has revealed a remarkably robust correlation, akin to stumbling upon a historical artifact in the digital domain.

The tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers has unfurled a tale as intriguing as a history mystery series. Our findings leave us pondering the possibility of history buffs indirectly stoking the flames of LPG consumption, much like a historical drama heating up the domestic kitchens of the UK.

As we bid adieu to this scholarly voyage, let us reflect on the unexpected connections that permeate our digital and domestic spheres. The fusion of historical musings and everyday energy choices leaves us with a renewed appreciation for the whimsy and wonder that lingers in our data-driven world.

It is clear that no more research is needed in this area, as our findings have shed light on the unanticipated correlations between seemingly disparate realms. The verdict is in: the tango between total views on Extra History YouTube and LPG usage in the UK is a truly titillating tale that requires no further elaboration. So, let our scholarly ships set sail for other intriguing waters, leaving this comedic connection to linger in the annals of academic curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Digital Culture and Transcontinental Energy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transdisciplinary Pop Culture and Petroleum Studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tango between Total Views on Extra History YouTube and Transatlantic Termination of Liquefied Petroleum in the UK: A Titillating Tale with an abstract of This study delves into the ostensibly incongruous linkage between the total views garnered by Extra History YouTube videos and the consumption of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in the United Kingdom. Amidst the labyrinthine world of digital media and energy consumption, our research team sought to disentangle the strands of correlation between these seemingly disparate realms. Utilizing data from YouTube analytics and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a meticulous analysis spanning the years 2012 to 2022. Intriguingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9127136, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. While our research may seem whimsical at first glance, the tantalizing tango between online history enthusiasts and LPG consumers offers a humorous yet thought-provoking foray into the intersection of digital entertainment and energy trends. So, come along on this scholarly expedition as we unravel the unanticipated ties between history buffs and gas enthusiasts, and consider the comedic implications of such connections in our modern world.

ChatGPT:

"Extra History YouTube," "total views," "LPG consumption UK," "correlation," "YouTube analytics," "Energy Information Administration," "digital entertainment," "energy trends," "correlation coefficient," "p-value," "online history enthusiasts," "gas consumers," "scholarly expedition"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total views on Extra History YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total views on Extra History YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Total views on Extra History YouTube videos

Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in United Kingdom in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom

Correlation r = 0.9127136 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8330461 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on Extra History YouTube videos) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.8E-5. 0.0000884083263327665000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0088% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,311 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.69, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Total views on Extra History YouTube videos (Total views)639565003638570067422700118577000128093000168560000133469000103029000549846004289030053753300
Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom (Million Barrels/Day)78.72473.005575.12689.876793.453693.194591.586390.646679.969979.068581.4192




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([63956500,36385700,67422700,118577000,128093000,168560000,133469000,103029000,54984600,42890300,53753300,])
array_2 = np.array([78.724,73.0055,75.126,89.8767,93.4536,93.1945,91.5863,90.6466,79.9699,79.0685,81.4192,])
array_1_name = "Total views on Extra History YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in United Kingdom"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 5550 · Black Variable ID: 25790 · Red Variable ID: 25049
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0