about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,108 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'who is prince william' and the second variable is The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became curious about Prince William, they realized the importance of succession planning and proper leadership development. This led to a spike in demand for HR specialists in Hawaii, who were now tasked with finding the best candidates to rule their own little kingdoms within the workplace. After all, every company needs a royal succession plan, right?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute 2D animation ] Generate an image of a Hawaiian beach filled with animated characters. In the background, a cheerful "Hawaiian HR Convention" sign stands tall against the blue sky. The sun shines brightly, casting a warm glow over the lively scene. The beach is bustling with activity as groups of people, represented with playful animations, converse and exchange ideas. Some individuals hold clipboards and engage in lively discussions, while others excitedly point to a giant banner featuring an animated depiction of Prince William. In the distance, a stage is being assembled for presentations on HR best practices. The overall atmosphere radiates aspiration and renewed passion for a new career path, captured through vibrant and engaging animations. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Increased searches for "who is Prince William" led to an influx of people realizing they're not living up to their full potential, prompting them to seek out new career paths. As a result, many Hawaiians discovered a newfound passion for human resources, inspired by the Prince's royal duties and HR-like responsibilities (ensuring the monarchy runs smoothly, managing family dynamics, etc.). The correlation is obvious - the search for a royal role model led to an increase in individuals pursuing a regal career as HR specialists, undoubtedly hoping to bring a touch of class and refinement to their workplace. Plus, let's not overlook the fact that Prince William's charming smile and royal charisma may have inadvertently convinced some Hawaiians to partake in "people management" as well!. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Cute 2D animation Art nouveau Data cyber art Low poly
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Increased searches for "who is Prince William" led to an influx of people realizing they're not living up to their full potential, prompting them to seek out new career paths. As a result, many Hawaiians discovered a newfound passion for human resources, inspired by the Prince's royal duties and HR-like responsibilities (ensuring the monarchy runs smoothly, managing family dynamics, etc.). The correlation is obvious - the search for a royal role model led to an increase in individuals pursuing a regal career as HR specialists, undoubtedly hoping to bring a touch of class and refinement to their workplace. Plus, let's not overlook the fact that Prince William's charming smile and royal charisma may have inadvertently convinced some Hawaiians to partake in "people management" as well!
ChatGPT: Imagine a Hawaiian beach bustling with activity. In the background, a large sign reads "Hawaiian HR Convention." The sun is shining, and the air is filled with excitement. On the beach, groups of people are gathered, chatting and exchanging ideas. Some are holding clipboards and talking animatedly. A few individuals excitedly point to a giant banner featuring Prince William. In the distance, a stage is being set up for presentations on HR best practices. The atmosphere is filled with an air of aspiration and renewed passion for a new career path.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a Hawaiian beach bustling with activity. In the background, a large sign reads "Hawaiian HR Convention." The sun is shining, and the air is filled with excitement. On the beach, groups of people are gathered, chatting and exchanging ideas. Some are holding clipboards and talking animatedly. A few individuals excitedly point to a giant banner featuring Prince William. In the distance, a stage is being set up for presentations on HR best practices. The atmosphere is filled with an air of aspiration and renewed passion for a new career path. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute 2D animation ] Generate an image of a Hawaiian beach filled with animated characters. In the background, a cheerful "Hawaiian HR Convention" sign stands tall against the blue sky. The sun shines brightly, casting a warm glow over the lively scene. The beach is bustling with activity as groups of people, represented with playful animations, converse and exchange ideas. Some individuals hold clipboards and engage in lively discussions, while others excitedly point to a giant banner featuring an animated depiction of Prince William. In the distance, a stage is being assembled for presentations on HR best practices. The overall atmosphere radiates aspiration and renewed passion for a new career path, captured through vibrant and engaging animations.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in who is prince william (Google searches for 'who is prince william') caused The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for Who is Prince William and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

The Journal of Absurd Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of popular culture and labor market trends has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popular Google search query "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the picturesque state of Hawaii. While these two phenomena may seem worlds apart, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites us to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and labor dynamics.

As the digital age continues to shape the way we seek and consume information, Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding public interests and trends. Our investigation harnesses the power of Google Trends to examine the frequency and geographical distribution of searches for "Who is Prince William" over a span of ten years. At the same time, we turn to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for human resources specialists in Hawaii during the same period. The juxtaposition of these datasets uncovers a compelling narrative that transcends mere coincidence, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors at play.

The choice of "Who is Prince William" as the focal point of our inquiry is not arbitrary. Beyond his status as a prominent figure in British royalty, Prince William embodies a captivating blend of tradition and modernity, with a charismatic presence in the global spotlight. This intrigue surrounding the prince's identity and role in contemporary society serves as a lens through which we can examine societal interests and their potential impact on local labor markets.

Hawaii, with its idyllic landscapes and unique cultural tapestry, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The state's economic landscape, characterized by a diverse array of industries and an emphasis on tourism, sets the stage for a captivating exploration of how global fascination with a royal figure may intertwine with the demand for human resources expertise in a distinctive local context. Through our analysis, we aim to uncover the nuances and implications of this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the complex interplay between popular curiosity and professional pursuits.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where empirical rigor meets the whimsy of pop culture intrigue. Our findings promise to unveil a tapestry of connections that expands our comprehension of information behavior and labor market dynamics, all while inviting a playful excursion through the realms of celebrity fascination and professional expertise. With a steady gaze on the data and a sprinkle of lighthearted curiosity, we set out to untangle the royally googgled connection and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and labor market trends has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popular Google search query "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the picturesque state of Hawaii. While these two phenomena may seem worlds apart, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites us to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and labor dynamics.
As the digital age continues to shape the way we seek and consume information, Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding public interests and trends. Our investigation harnesses the power of Google Trends to examine the frequency and geographical distribution of searches for "Who is Prince William" over a span of ten years. At the same time, we turn to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for human resources specialists in Hawaii during the same period. The juxtaposition of these datasets uncovers a compelling narrative that transcends mere coincidence, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors at play.
The choice of "Who is Prince William" as the focal point of our inquiry is not arbitrary. Beyond his status as a prominent figure in British royalty, Prince William embodies a captivating blend of tradition and modernity, with a charismatic presence in the global spotlight. This intrigue surrounding the prince's identity and role in contemporary society serves as a lens through which we can examine societal interests and their potential impact on local labor markets.
Hawaii, with its idyllic landscapes and unique cultural tapestry, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The state's economic landscape, characterized by a diverse array of industries and an emphasis on tourism, sets the stage for a captivating exploration of how global fascination with a royal figure may intertwine with the demand for human resources expertise in a distinctive local context. Through our analysis, we aim to uncover the nuances and implications of this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the complex interplay between popular curiosity and professional pursuits.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where empirical rigor meets the whimsy of pop culture intrigue. Our findings promise to unveil a tapestry of connections that expands our comprehension of information behavior and labor market dynamics, all while inviting a playful excursion through the realms of celebrity fascination and professional expertise. With a steady gaze on the data and a sprinkle of lighthearted curiosity, we set out to untangle the royally googgled connection and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has been a subject of keen interest to researchers across various disciplines. Smith and Doe (2015) investigated the interplay between popular culture and labor market trends, shedding light on the unexpected connections that emerge from the collective psyche. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) explored the impact of digital age phenomena on public interests and behavior, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of information consumption and its broader societal implications.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction works, "The Royal We" by Heather Cocks and Jessica Morgan offers a captivating exploration of the fascination with monarchy and its intertwining with contemporary society. Similarly, "HR for Dummies" by Max Messmer provides a comprehensive guide to the world of human resources, delving into the intricacies of the profession with a touch of humor and practicality.

In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Crown" series by Kiera Cass and "Crazy Rich Asians" by Kevin Kwan delve into the opulence and intrigue of royal life, offering a lens through which to contemplate the intersection of celebrity fascination and societal dynamics.

Notably, social media posts have also contributed to the discourse surrounding popular curiosity and professional pursuits. A tweet by @HRHPrinceFanatic2019 pondering the impact of royal fervor on local labor markets in tropical paradises has garnered attention, prompting discussions on the unexpected intersections of global intrigue and professional expertise.

As we traverse the landscape of literature and digital discourse, it becomes evident that the interconnectedness of curiosity, employment, and popular culture is a tapestry woven with threads of amusement and scholarly inquisition. The juxtaposition of these sources not only offers a nuanced understanding of public interests and labor market dynamics but also invites a whimsical stroll through the enigmatic corridors of shared human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and labor market trends has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popular Google search query "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the picturesque state of Hawaii. While these two phenomena may seem worlds apart, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites us to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and labor dynamics.
As the digital age continues to shape the way we seek and consume information, Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding public interests and trends. Our investigation harnesses the power of Google Trends to examine the frequency and geographical distribution of searches for "Who is Prince William" over a span of ten years. At the same time, we turn to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for human resources specialists in Hawaii during the same period. The juxtaposition of these datasets uncovers a compelling narrative that transcends mere coincidence, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors at play.
The choice of "Who is Prince William" as the focal point of our inquiry is not arbitrary. Beyond his status as a prominent figure in British royalty, Prince William embodies a captivating blend of tradition and modernity, with a charismatic presence in the global spotlight. This intrigue surrounding the prince's identity and role in contemporary society serves as a lens through which we can examine societal interests and their potential impact on local labor markets.
Hawaii, with its idyllic landscapes and unique cultural tapestry, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The state's economic landscape, characterized by a diverse array of industries and an emphasis on tourism, sets the stage for a captivating exploration of how global fascination with a royal figure may intertwine with the demand for human resources expertise in a distinctive local context. Through our analysis, we aim to uncover the nuances and implications of this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the complex interplay between popular curiosity and professional pursuits.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where empirical rigor meets the whimsy of pop culture intrigue. Our findings promise to unveil a tapestry of connections that expands our comprehension of information behavior and labor market dynamics, all while inviting a playful excursion through the realms of celebrity fascination and professional expertise. With a steady gaze on the data and a sprinkle of lighthearted curiosity, we set out to untangle the royally googgled connection and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quest to unravel the royally googgled connection between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii, we employed a multifaceted approach that involved both quantitative analysis and a touch of whimsy. Our methodology sought to navigate the labyrinth of data while keeping an eye out for any unexpected twists and turns along the way.

**Data Collection and Preprocessing:**
We harnessed the power of Google Trends to capture the zeitgeist of public curiosity surrounding Prince William. By querying the search term "Who is Prince William" across a time span from 2012 to 2022, we harvested a bountiful crop of search interest data. This allowed us to delve into the ebb and flow of global fascination with the British royal, while also keeping a lookout for any potential spikes in interest that may coincide with significant milestones in his princely journey.

On the other side of the spectrum, we turned to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to glean insights into the employment landscape of Hawaii. Focusing our gaze specifically on the domain of human resources specialists, we meticulously extracted employment figures spanning the same temporal domain. These professional navigators of the workforce were at the heart of our exploration, guiding us through the labyrinthine corridors of labor market dynamics and, quite possibly, royal intrigue.

**Statistical Analysis:**
With our arsenal of data in hand, we donned our metaphorical lab coats and unleashed the powers of statistical wizardry upon the datasets. Employing the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient, we sought to quantify the degree of association between the intensity of Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the numerical roster of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Our calculations strove to uncover patterns that transcended the mere happenstance of data convergence, illuminating a path towards understanding the underlying relationship between these apparently disparate domains.

**Cross-Domain Examination:**
As we ventured deeper into the heart of our inquiry, we adopted a panoramic view, juxtaposing the tempestuous seas of search interest with the lush valleys of employment statistics. Through this interdisciplinary vantage point, we endeavored to discern echoes of correlation that reverberated across the chasms of popular culture and labor dynamics. In a daring bid to synthesize these divergent realms, we embarked on a quest to unearth the threads that wove a tapestry of connection, bridging the gap between princely queries and professional pursuits in the Hawaiian archipelago.

**Contingency Planning:**
In our pursuit of scholarly endeavors, it is essential to anticipate the unexpected and prepare for any incidental quirks that may arise. With this in mind, we remained vigilant for anomalies that could potentially dampen the veracity of our inferences. Whether it be an unusually fervent surge of royal curiosity or an unforeseen upheaval in the HR landscape, our methodology was primed to adapt to the capricious winds of fortune, all in the name of scientific rigor and a touch of scholarly derring-do.

Through this methodological odyssey, we laid the groundwork for an expedition that promised to reveal the uncanny interplay between the search for royal knowledge and the pursuit of human resources mastery in the enchanting environs of Hawaii. Armed with data, analytics, and a measure of irrepressible curiosity, we set out to chart the course through uncharted intellectual waters, where statistical exploration meets the whimsical allure of popular intrigue.

The distinct charm and allure of this research endeavour lies in its capacity to uncover connections that may initially appear as whimsical curiosities, yet hold the potential to illuminate deeper insights into human behavior and labor market dynamics. With a steady hand on the statistical tiller and a sparkle of inquisitiveness in our eyes, we set sail to unveil the royal secrets hidden within the enigmatic currents of search queries and employment trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9516988, r-squared of 0.9057307, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of popular culture and labor market trends has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popular Google search query "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the picturesque state of Hawaii. While these two phenomena may seem worlds apart, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites us to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and labor dynamics.
As the digital age continues to shape the way we seek and consume information, Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding public interests and trends. Our investigation harnesses the power of Google Trends to examine the frequency and geographical distribution of searches for "Who is Prince William" over a span of ten years. At the same time, we turn to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for human resources specialists in Hawaii during the same period. The juxtaposition of these datasets uncovers a compelling narrative that transcends mere coincidence, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors at play.
The choice of "Who is Prince William" as the focal point of our inquiry is not arbitrary. Beyond his status as a prominent figure in British royalty, Prince William embodies a captivating blend of tradition and modernity, with a charismatic presence in the global spotlight. This intrigue surrounding the prince's identity and role in contemporary society serves as a lens through which we can examine societal interests and their potential impact on local labor markets.
Hawaii, with its idyllic landscapes and unique cultural tapestry, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The state's economic landscape, characterized by a diverse array of industries and an emphasis on tourism, sets the stage for a captivating exploration of how global fascination with a royal figure may intertwine with the demand for human resources expertise in a distinctive local context. Through our analysis, we aim to uncover the nuances and implications of this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the complex interplay between popular curiosity and professional pursuits.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where empirical rigor meets the whimsy of pop culture intrigue. Our findings promise to unveil a tapestry of connections that expands our comprehension of information behavior and labor market dynamics, all while inviting a playful excursion through the realms of celebrity fascination and professional expertise. With a steady gaze on the data and a sprinkle of lighthearted curiosity, we set out to untangle the royally googgled connection and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The empirical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. This finding indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9057307, signifying that approximately 90.57% of the variation in the demand for HR specialists in Hawaii can be explained by changes in Google searches for Prince William. The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability and strength of the observed correlation.

To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to illustrate the compelling linkage between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Please imagine a graph where the data points are not just points, but tiny crowns or leis.

The onset of this correlation, spanning a decade from 2012 to 2022, reveals an intriguing harmony between public curiosity about a prominent member of the British royal family and the labor market dynamics in the serene setting of Hawaii. This connection beckons further exploration and invites a lighthearted reflection on the curious intersections of global fascination and local employment patterns.

Irrespective of being fond of Prince William, it's clear that the interest in him seems to have some influence on the labor market in Hawaii. Whether this influence is due to a wish for a more regal workplace or merely a reflection of broader cultural trends remains a mystery for future research to unravel. In any case, the convergence of royal curiosities and professional pursuits has broadened our understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world, proving that even the most unexpected correlations can offer poignant insights when viewed through the lens of both empirical analysis and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between seemingly disparate phenomena has been a subject of keen interest to researchers across various disciplines. Smith and Doe (2015) investigated the interplay between popular culture and labor market trends, shedding light on the unexpected connections that emerge from the collective psyche. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2018) explored the impact of digital age phenomena on public interests and behavior, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of information consumption and its broader societal implications.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction works, "The Royal We" by Heather Cocks and Jessica Morgan offers a captivating exploration of the fascination with monarchy and its intertwining with contemporary society. Similarly, "HR for Dummies" by Max Messmer provides a comprehensive guide to the world of human resources, delving into the intricacies of the profession with a touch of humor and practicality.
In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Crown" series by Kiera Cass and "Crazy Rich Asians" by Kevin Kwan delve into the opulence and intrigue of royal life, offering a lens through which to contemplate the intersection of celebrity fascination and societal dynamics.
Notably, social media posts have also contributed to the discourse surrounding popular curiosity and professional pursuits. A tweet by @HRHPrinceFanatic2019 pondering the impact of royal fervor on local labor markets in tropical paradises has garnered attention, prompting discussions on the unexpected intersections of global intrigue and professional expertise.
As we traverse the landscape of literature and digital discourse, it becomes evident that the interconnectedness of curiosity, employment, and popular culture is a tapestry woven with threads of amusement and scholarly inquisition. The juxtaposition of these sources not only offers a nuanced understanding of public interests and labor market dynamics but also invites a whimsical stroll through the enigmatic corridors of shared human experience.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. This finding indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9057307, signifying that approximately 90.57% of the variation in the demand for HR specialists in Hawaii can be explained by changes in Google searches for Prince William. The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability and strength of the observed correlation.
To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to illustrate the compelling linkage between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Please imagine a graph where the data points are not just points, but tiny crowns or leis.
The onset of this correlation, spanning a decade from 2012 to 2022, reveals an intriguing harmony between public curiosity about a prominent member of the British royal family and the labor market dynamics in the serene setting of Hawaii. This connection beckons further exploration and invites a lighthearted reflection on the curious intersections of global fascination and local employment patterns.
Irrespective of being fond of Prince William, it's clear that the interest in him seems to have some influence on the labor market in Hawaii. Whether this influence is due to a wish for a more regal workplace or merely a reflection of broader cultural trends remains a mystery for future research to unravel. In any case, the convergence of royal curiosities and professional pursuits has broadened our understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world, proving that even the most unexpected correlations can offer poignant insights when viewed through the lens of both empirical analysis and whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unveiled a striking correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the demand for human resources specialists in Hawaii, elucidating a fascinating intertwining of seemingly incongruous phenomena. This unexpected synergy of global intrigue and local labor market dynamics echoes prior research by Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018), affirming the significance of exploring the interplay between popular culture and professional pursuits with scholarly rigor. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 indicates a strong positive relationship, aligning with the hypothesis that the public's fascination with British royalty exerts an intriguing influence on the demand for HR expertise in the tropical oasis of Hawaii.

Drawing from the whimsical juxtapositions outlined in our literature review, particularly the tweet by @HRHPrinceFanatic2019, we navigate the convivial corridors of public curiosity and professional endeavors to unravel the enigmatic threads that weave together playful intrigue and labor market dynamics. As we gaze upon the scatterplot (Fig. 1), envisioning each data point bedecked with tiny crowns or leis, we are reminded that even in the realm of empirical analysis, there is room for playful contemplation and lighthearted reflection.

The statistical significance of this correlation, with a p-value below 0.01, underscores its robustness and reliability, echoing the sentiment expressed by Cocks and Morgan in "The Royal We" as they illuminate the captivating intersection of monarchy and contemporary society. This association of global fascination with local labor dynamics invites a thoughtful consideration of the subtle yet potent influences that shape our professional landscapes.

While this study offers empirical evidence of the correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship remain shrouded in whimsy and scholarly mystery. The allure of Prince William may indeed cast a regal spell on the labor market in Hawaii, prompting a whimsical contemplation of the potential impact on workplace ambiance and cultural trends. Nonetheless, the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin this correlation serve as a whimsical reminder that scholarly inquiry need not forsake the joys of serendipitous discovery and playful exploration.

As we peer through the lens of both empirical analysis and whimsy, we are reminded that the unlikeliest of correlations can yield profound insights, infusing scholarly discourse with a touch of mirth and intrigue. This study enriches our understanding of the intricate tapestry woven from public curiosity, professional pursuits, and the enigmatic dance of global fascination with local labor dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'who is prince william' and The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for "Who is Prince William" and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of popular culture and labor market trends has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic relationship between the popular Google search query "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the picturesque state of Hawaii. While these two phenomena may seem worlds apart, our analysis reveals a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites us to explore the quirky intricacies of human behavior and labor dynamics.
As the digital age continues to shape the way we seek and consume information, Google search data has emerged as a valuable tool for understanding public interests and trends. Our investigation harnesses the power of Google Trends to examine the frequency and geographical distribution of searches for "Who is Prince William" over a span of ten years. At the same time, we turn to the Bureau of Labor Statistics to track the employment figures for human resources specialists in Hawaii during the same period. The juxtaposition of these datasets uncovers a compelling narrative that transcends mere coincidence, prompting us to unravel the underlying factors at play.
The choice of "Who is Prince William" as the focal point of our inquiry is not arbitrary. Beyond his status as a prominent figure in British royalty, Prince William embodies a captivating blend of tradition and modernity, with a charismatic presence in the global spotlight. This intrigue surrounding the prince's identity and role in contemporary society serves as a lens through which we can examine societal interests and their potential impact on local labor markets.
Hawaii, with its idyllic landscapes and unique cultural tapestry, provides an intriguing backdrop for our investigation. The state's economic landscape, characterized by a diverse array of industries and an emphasis on tourism, sets the stage for a captivating exploration of how global fascination with a royal figure may intertwine with the demand for human resources expertise in a distinctive local context. Through our analysis, we aim to uncover the nuances and implications of this unexpected correlation, shedding light on the complex interplay between popular curiosity and professional pursuits.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, where empirical rigor meets the whimsy of pop culture intrigue. Our findings promise to unveil a tapestry of connections that expands our comprehension of information behavior and labor market dynamics, all while inviting a playful excursion through the realms of celebrity fascination and professional expertise. With a steady gaze on the data and a sprinkle of lighthearted curiosity, we set out to untangle the royally googgled connection and pave the way for a deeper understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world.

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis yielded a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. This finding indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9057307, signifying that approximately 90.57% of the variation in the demand for HR specialists in Hawaii can be explained by changes in Google searches for Prince William. The statistical significance of this relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the reliability and strength of the observed correlation.
To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) has been included to illustrate the compelling linkage between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in Hawaii. Please imagine a graph where the data points are not just points, but tiny crowns or leis.
The onset of this correlation, spanning a decade from 2012 to 2022, reveals an intriguing harmony between public curiosity about a prominent member of the British royal family and the labor market dynamics in the serene setting of Hawaii. This connection beckons further exploration and invites a lighthearted reflection on the curious intersections of global fascination and local employment patterns.
Irrespective of being fond of Prince William, it's clear that the interest in him seems to have some influence on the labor market in Hawaii. Whether this influence is due to a wish for a more regal workplace or merely a reflection of broader cultural trends remains a mystery for future research to unravel. In any case, the convergence of royal curiosities and professional pursuits has broadened our understanding of the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world, proving that even the most unexpected correlations can offer poignant insights when viewed through the lens of both empirical analysis and whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding this whimsically insightful expedition into the peculiar convergence of global intrigue and local labor dynamics, our findings have uncovered a correlation of regal proportions. The robust relationship between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the demand for human resources specialists in Hawaii, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 and an r-squared value indicative of a captivating 90.57% explanation, presents an intriguing fusion of popular curiosity and professional pursuits. As we gaze upon the scatterplot illustrating this delightful linkage, it becomes evident that the whims of the public can yield unexpected—yet statistically significant—impacts on the fabric of local employment trends. It's almost as if Prince William's influence extends beyond royal affairs and wields a subtle yet palpable sway over the labor market, akin to a royal scepter guiding the whimsical dance of data points in our graph.

While we have shed light on this enchanting correlation, the mysteries underlying this convergence linger, prompting further pondering on whether the allure of British royalty translates into a yearning for a more regally infused workplace ambiance. Nonetheless, as we bid adieu to this scholarly escapade, it becomes clear that the regally googgled connection between public fascination with Prince William and the demand for HR expertise in Hawaii stands as a testament to the delightful idiosyncrasies that shape our world. With a tip of the hat to statistical significance and a nod to the enigmatic dance of curiosity and labor dynamics, we assert that no further research is needed in this delightfully eccentric realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for Who is Prince William and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Absurd Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for Who is Prince William and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Bizarre Socio-Digital Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Royally Googled Connection: Unveiling the Correlation Between Google Searches for Who is Prince William and the Number of Human Resources Specialists in Hawaii with an abstract of This paper examines the peculiar yet intriguing correlation between Google searches for "Who is Prince William" and the number of human resources specialists in the tropical paradise of Hawaii. Utilizing Google Trends data and Bureau of Labor Statistics records, a correlation coefficient of 0.9516988 with statistical significance at p < 0.01 was observed for the period of 2012 to 2022. Our findings unveil a surprising intertwining of the public's intrigue with British royalty and the demand for HR expertise in the Aloha State. Delving into this uncharted territory, we unravel the mysteries underlying these seemingly unrelated phenomena and offer insights that may play a significant role in understanding both global information behavior and local labor market trends. As we venture into this intersection of data, we not only shed light on the correlation but also embark on a whimsical journey through the realms of pop culture, curiosity, and, of course, scholarly analysis.

ChatGPT:

"Google searches for Who is Prince William", "number of human resources specialists in Hawaii", "correlation coefficient", "Google Trends data", "Bureau of Labor Statistics records", "Hawaii labor market trends", "British royalty public intrigue", "global information behavior", "local labor market correlation", "pop culture and labor market trends"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'who is prince william'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is prince william' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is prince william'

The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of human resources specialists in Hawaii
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii

Correlation r = 0.9516988 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9057307 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'who is prince william') over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.5E-6. 0.0000065300122057495830000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00065% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 153,139 random variables You don't actually need 153 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Google searches for 'who is prince william' (Rel. search volume)3.416673.666672.53.166673.254.166676.833334.416675.833336.7514.75
The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii (Laborers)16001690160016201610178019802140219022103060




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.41667,3.66667,2.5,3.16667,3.25,4.16667,6.83333,4.41667,5.83333,6.75,14.75,])
array_2 = np.array([1600,1690,1600,1620,1610,1780,1980,2140,2190,2210,3060,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'who is prince william'"
array_2_name = "The number of human resources specialists in Hawaii"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1108 · Black Variable ID: 1443 · Red Variable ID: 19009
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0