about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,155 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lamar and the second variable is Customer satisfaction with UPS.  The chart goes from 1994 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It turns out, every time someone named Lamar received a package, they couldn't help but give UPS a 5-star rating on their delivery services. This inflated their customer satisfaction scores. But as the name Lamar fell out of favor, UPS saw a dip in these inflated ratings, leading to a decrease in overall customer satisfaction. It seems like Lamar had some serious delivery-approval powers!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a cyberpunk kitchen with a bustling atmosphere. A bulletin board is prominently displayed, adorned with colorful thank-you notes addressed to "Lamar," symbolizing packages delivered on time. As the scene progresses, the notes gradually vanish, leaving empty spaces on the board. The diminishing notes reflect a sense of waning warmth and satisfaction, impacting the overall mood of the kitchen. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: A decrease in the popularity of the name Lamar has led to a decrease in customer satisfaction with UPS because as the name Lamar becomes less popular, there are fewer people named Lamar to appreciate the efficiency and reliability of UPS deliveries. This lack of appreciation has a ripple effect on overall customer satisfaction with the company.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Cyberpunk Celtic art Steampunk Realistic
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. A decrease in the popularity of the name Lamar has led to a decrease in customer satisfaction with UPS because as the name Lamar becomes less popular, there are fewer people named Lamar to appreciate the efficiency and reliability of UPS deliveries. This lack of appreciation has a ripple effect on overall customer satisfaction with the company.
ChatGPT: In a warm, bustling kitchen, a bulletin board is covered in colorful thank-you notes, each addressed to "Lamar," expressing gratitude for packages that arrived right on time. However, as the scene unfolds, the notes start to disappear one by one, leaving behind empty spaces. With fewer notes left, the warmth and satisfaction in the room diminishes, impacting the overall mood.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In a warm, bustling kitchen, a bulletin board is covered in colorful thank-you notes, each addressed to "Lamar," expressing gratitude for packages that arrived right on time. However, as the scene unfolds, the notes start to disappear one by one, leaving behind empty spaces. With fewer notes left, the warmth and satisfaction in the room diminishes, impacting the overall mood. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a cyberpunk kitchen with a bustling atmosphere. A bulletin board is prominently displayed, adorned with colorful thank-you notes addressed to "Lamar," symbolizing packages delivered on time. As the scene progresses, the notes gradually vanish, leaving empty spaces on the board. The diminishing notes reflect a sense of waning warmth and satisfaction, impacting the overall mood of the kitchen.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Lamar caused Customer satisfaction with UPS to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

The Journal of Offbeat Criminology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and American Customer Satisfaction Index to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7348114 and p < 0.01 for 1994 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between a person's name and their experiences in daily life has long been a subject of intrigue. From the academic ponderings of nominative determinism to the practical considerations of how a name might impact an individual's prospects, the influence of nomenclature on the human experience is a topic of perpetual fascination. In a similar vein, the field of customer satisfaction research has sought to unravel the myriad factors that contribute to consumer contentment with the products and services they encounter. However, the intersection of these two areas of inquiry has largely remained unexplored, leaving a substantial gap in our understanding of consumer behavior and the whims of destiny.

It is within this captivating context that our research endeavors to investigate the correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with the United Parcel Service (UPS). While on the surface, the connection between a name and a delivery service may appear tenuous at best, our preliminary exploration has unearthed a statistically significant relationship that demands further scrutiny. This seemingly serendipitous link between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction raises intriguing questions about the subtle influences that shape consumer experiences – questions that beckon us to embark on a curious journey through the realms of nomenclatural notability and logistical contentment.

Despite the levity that the juxtaposition of "Lamar" and UPS may elicit, this investigation is underpinned by rigorous empirical analysis and a commitment to unveiling the enigmatic patterns that govern consumer preferences. By delving into the depths of historical data and wielding the formidable tools of statistical inquiry, our research aims to illuminate the peculiar connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and the satisfaction of recipients of brown-clad parcels. Through this endeavor, we aspire to not only contribute to the burgeoning field of consumer satisfaction research but also to offer a lighthearted perspective on the curious confluence of nomenclature and delivery service dynamics.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unravel the intricacies of our methodology, present the compelling findings of our analysis, and elucidate the implications of our discoveries. As we navigate through the realms of nomenclature and consumer contentment, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical expedition, where statistical inquiry and name-based musings converge to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our daily interactions – much like how a UPS delivery driver might navigate the intertwining streets of fate and satisfaction, carrying packages destined for a more contented Lamar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between a person's name and their experiences in daily life has long been a subject of intrigue. From the academic ponderings of nominative determinism to the practical considerations of how a name might impact an individual's prospects, the influence of nomenclature on the human experience is a topic of perpetual fascination. In a similar vein, the field of customer satisfaction research has sought to unravel the myriad factors that contribute to consumer contentment with the products and services they encounter. However, the intersection of these two areas of inquiry has largely remained unexplored, leaving a substantial gap in our understanding of consumer behavior and the whims of destiny.
It is within this captivating context that our research endeavors to investigate the correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with the United Parcel Service (UPS). While on the surface, the connection between a name and a delivery service may appear tenuous at best, our preliminary exploration has unearthed a statistically significant relationship that demands further scrutiny. This seemingly serendipitous link between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction raises intriguing questions about the subtle influences that shape consumer experiences – questions that beckon us to embark on a curious journey through the realms of nomenclatural notability and logistical contentment.
Despite the levity that the juxtaposition of "Lamar" and UPS may elicit, this investigation is underpinned by rigorous empirical analysis and a commitment to unveiling the enigmatic patterns that govern consumer preferences. By delving into the depths of historical data and wielding the formidable tools of statistical inquiry, our research aims to illuminate the peculiar connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and the satisfaction of recipients of brown-clad parcels. Through this endeavor, we aspire to not only contribute to the burgeoning field of consumer satisfaction research but also to offer a lighthearted perspective on the curious confluence of nomenclature and delivery service dynamics.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unravel the intricacies of our methodology, present the compelling findings of our analysis, and elucidate the implications of our discoveries. As we navigate through the realms of nomenclature and consumer contentment, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical expedition, where statistical inquiry and name-based musings converge to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our daily interactions – much like how a UPS delivery driver might navigate the intertwining streets of fate and satisfaction, carrying packages destined for a more contented Lamar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS builds upon existing research that examines the impact of nomenclature on various facets of human experience. Smith et al. (2008) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the potential effects of names on individuals' career choices, finding that individuals with certain names may be more inclined toward particular professions. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the phenomenon of nominative determinism, exploring the intriguing tendency for individuals to gravitate toward activities or occupations that reflect their names. These foundational studies illustrate the enduring fascination with the influence of names on human behavior and set the stage for our whimsical exploration into the interplay between the name "Lamar" and satisfaction with UPS deliveries.

Turning to the domain of customer satisfaction, Lorem and Ipsum (2012) provide a thorough review of the factors that shape consumers' perceptions of service quality. Their work highlights the multifaceted nature of satisfaction with commercial services, emphasizing the intricate interplay between tangible service attributes and intangible emotional experiences. Furthermore, Lorem and Ipsum (2017) delve into the nuances of consumer loyalty, shedding light on the intricate web of factors that engender long-term allegiance to particular brands or service providers. These scholarly endeavors contribute to our understanding of the complex tapestry of consumer satisfaction, which serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the peculiar connection between the name "Lamar" and UPS service satisfaction.

In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell, and "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely offer intriguing insights into human decision-making and behavior, providing a thought-provoking context for our study. Furthermore, works of fiction such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, "The Shipping News" by Annie Proulx, and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon weave narratives that, while not directly related to our research, offer a whimsical reflection on the intricacies of human experiences and the peculiarities of fate.

In the realm of popular culture, TV shows such as "The Good Place," "The Big Bang Theory," and "The Office" offer glimpses into the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and interpersonal dynamics, providing a lighthearted backdrop for our investigation. While these sources may not directly address the specific link between the name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS, they offer a playful perspective on the varied facets of human existence and the serendipitous connections that shape our daily lives.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and American Customer Satisfaction Index . You used data from 1994 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between a person's name and their experiences in daily life has long been a subject of intrigue. From the academic ponderings of nominative determinism to the practical considerations of how a name might impact an individual's prospects, the influence of nomenclature on the human experience is a topic of perpetual fascination. In a similar vein, the field of customer satisfaction research has sought to unravel the myriad factors that contribute to consumer contentment with the products and services they encounter. However, the intersection of these two areas of inquiry has largely remained unexplored, leaving a substantial gap in our understanding of consumer behavior and the whims of destiny.
It is within this captivating context that our research endeavors to investigate the correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with the United Parcel Service (UPS). While on the surface, the connection between a name and a delivery service may appear tenuous at best, our preliminary exploration has unearthed a statistically significant relationship that demands further scrutiny. This seemingly serendipitous link between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction raises intriguing questions about the subtle influences that shape consumer experiences – questions that beckon us to embark on a curious journey through the realms of nomenclatural notability and logistical contentment.
Despite the levity that the juxtaposition of "Lamar" and UPS may elicit, this investigation is underpinned by rigorous empirical analysis and a commitment to unveiling the enigmatic patterns that govern consumer preferences. By delving into the depths of historical data and wielding the formidable tools of statistical inquiry, our research aims to illuminate the peculiar connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and the satisfaction of recipients of brown-clad parcels. Through this endeavor, we aspire to not only contribute to the burgeoning field of consumer satisfaction research but also to offer a lighthearted perspective on the curious confluence of nomenclature and delivery service dynamics.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unravel the intricacies of our methodology, present the compelling findings of our analysis, and elucidate the implications of our discoveries. As we navigate through the realms of nomenclature and consumer contentment, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical expedition, where statistical inquiry and name-based musings converge to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our daily interactions – much like how a UPS delivery driver might navigate the intertwining streets of fate and satisfaction, carrying packages destined for a more contented Lamar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To flesh out the enigmatic intertwining of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, our methodology traversed through a tapestry of data sources and analytical procedures. Our research team embarked on a comprehensive data collection endeavor, mining information from diverse repositories to construct a robust foundation for our investigation.

In the elucidation of the prevalence of the first name "Lamar," data from the US Social Security Administration served as a primary wellspring of nomenclatural insights. This dataset provided us with the historical popularity trends of the name "Lamar" from 1994 to 2021, enabling a thorough examination of its ebb and flow across the temporal expanse. With diligence akin to an archivist preserving the chronicles of nomenclatural evolution, our team meticulously compiled and scrutinized these statistics to unveil the fluctuating prominence of "Lamar" within the fabric of nomenclature.

In weaving the fabric of customer satisfaction with UPS, the American Customer Satisfaction Index emerged as an invaluable reservoir of consumer sentiment. This index, a trove of perceptions and appraisals spanning an assortment of industries, furnished us with the means to gauge the satisfaction levels of the benefactors of UPS services. Leveraging this repository, we scrutinized the variegated hues of customer contentment and dissatisfaction, spotlighting the nuanced interplay between service excellence and the whims of consumer preferences.

To forge a tangible connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS, we harnessed the formidable potency of statistical analysis. Employing sophisticated correlation techniques and regression models, we interlaced the temporal trajectories of Lamar's acclaim with the undulating waves of UPS satisfaction. With the finesse of a maestro conducting an intricate symphony, we orchestrated the harmonic resonance of these disparate datasets, culminating in the revelation of a startling correlation coefficient of 0.7348114. This noteworthy correlation, draped in statistical significance at p < 0.01, engenders a vivid portrayal of the entwined trajectories of "Lamar" and UPS satisfaction, casting a luminous spotlight on this curious confluence.

Within the web of our methodology, the confluence of data sources, statistical ingenuity, and analytical contemplation afforded us a vantage point from which to unravel the perplexing links between nomenclature and consumer contentment. As we plunge into the depths of our findings, we invite our readers to accompany us on this voyage of statistical inquiry and interpersonal serendipity – an expedition where the quirky quirks of nomenclature coalesce with the unfurling narratives of consumer satisfaction, unveiling the unexpected correlations lurking amidst the peculiarities of our mundane existence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and American Customer Satisfaction Index .

For the time period 1994 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7348114, r-squared of 0.5399477, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between a person's name and their experiences in daily life has long been a subject of intrigue. From the academic ponderings of nominative determinism to the practical considerations of how a name might impact an individual's prospects, the influence of nomenclature on the human experience is a topic of perpetual fascination. In a similar vein, the field of customer satisfaction research has sought to unravel the myriad factors that contribute to consumer contentment with the products and services they encounter. However, the intersection of these two areas of inquiry has largely remained unexplored, leaving a substantial gap in our understanding of consumer behavior and the whims of destiny.
It is within this captivating context that our research endeavors to investigate the correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with the United Parcel Service (UPS). While on the surface, the connection between a name and a delivery service may appear tenuous at best, our preliminary exploration has unearthed a statistically significant relationship that demands further scrutiny. This seemingly serendipitous link between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction raises intriguing questions about the subtle influences that shape consumer experiences – questions that beckon us to embark on a curious journey through the realms of nomenclatural notability and logistical contentment.
Despite the levity that the juxtaposition of "Lamar" and UPS may elicit, this investigation is underpinned by rigorous empirical analysis and a commitment to unveiling the enigmatic patterns that govern consumer preferences. By delving into the depths of historical data and wielding the formidable tools of statistical inquiry, our research aims to illuminate the peculiar connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and the satisfaction of recipients of brown-clad parcels. Through this endeavor, we aspire to not only contribute to the burgeoning field of consumer satisfaction research but also to offer a lighthearted perspective on the curious confluence of nomenclature and delivery service dynamics.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unravel the intricacies of our methodology, present the compelling findings of our analysis, and elucidate the implications of our discoveries. As we navigate through the realms of nomenclature and consumer contentment, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical expedition, where statistical inquiry and name-based musings converge to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our daily interactions – much like how a UPS delivery driver might navigate the intertwining streets of fate and satisfaction, carrying packages destined for a more contented Lamar.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon conducting our analysis, we found a substantial correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. The correlation coefficient of 0.7348114 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The r-squared value of 0.5399477 further underscores the robustness of this association, suggesting that the prominence of the name "Lamar" explains over 53% of the variance in UPS customer satisfaction. Moreover, the statistical significance at p < 0.01 solidifies the validity of this intriguing connection, leaving little room to attribute our findings to mere happenstance. Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the striking correlation between the two variables, providing a visual representation of this remarkable relationship.

The magnitude of the correlation highlights the noteworthy nature of this linkage, prompting us to reflect on the role of nomenclature in shaping consumer experiences. It is an endeavor worthy of further exploration, akin to the unearthing of hidden treasures in the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and package delivery preferences. Although we have established the statistical significance of this correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association remain shrouded in mystery, much like the elusive contents of a UPS package en route to a more satisfied Lamar. As we unravel the implications of our findings, we invite readers to join us in this lighthearted journey through the uncharted territory where nomenclature and customer satisfaction intersect, reminiscent of an unpredictable delivery route through the whims of fate and packaging prognostication.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS builds upon existing research that examines the impact of nomenclature on various facets of human experience. Smith et al. (2008) conducted a comprehensive analysis on the potential effects of names on individuals' career choices, finding that individuals with certain names may be more inclined toward particular professions. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the phenomenon of nominative determinism, exploring the intriguing tendency for individuals to gravitate toward activities or occupations that reflect their names. These foundational studies illustrate the enduring fascination with the influence of names on human behavior and set the stage for our whimsical exploration into the interplay between the name "Lamar" and satisfaction with UPS deliveries.
Turning to the domain of customer satisfaction, Lorem and Ipsum (2012) provide a thorough review of the factors that shape consumers' perceptions of service quality. Their work highlights the multifaceted nature of satisfaction with commercial services, emphasizing the intricate interplay between tangible service attributes and intangible emotional experiences. Furthermore, Lorem and Ipsum (2017) delve into the nuances of consumer loyalty, shedding light on the intricate web of factors that engender long-term allegiance to particular brands or service providers. These scholarly endeavors contribute to our understanding of the complex tapestry of consumer satisfaction, which serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the peculiar connection between the name "Lamar" and UPS service satisfaction.
In the realm of non-fiction literature, books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell, and "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely offer intriguing insights into human decision-making and behavior, providing a thought-provoking context for our study. Furthermore, works of fiction such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, "The Shipping News" by Annie Proulx, and "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon weave narratives that, while not directly related to our research, offer a whimsical reflection on the intricacies of human experiences and the peculiarities of fate.
In the realm of popular culture, TV shows such as "The Good Place," "The Big Bang Theory," and "The Office" offer glimpses into the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and interpersonal dynamics, providing a lighthearted backdrop for our investigation. While these sources may not directly address the specific link between the name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS, they offer a playful perspective on the varied facets of human existence and the serendipitous connections that shape our daily lives.


[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a substantial correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. The correlation coefficient of 0.7348114 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The r-squared value of 0.5399477 further underscores the robustness of this association, suggesting that the prominence of the name "Lamar" explains over 53% of the variance in UPS customer satisfaction. Moreover, the statistical significance at p < 0.01 solidifies the validity of this intriguing connection, leaving little room to attribute our findings to mere happenstance. Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the striking correlation between the two variables, providing a visual representation of this remarkable relationship.
The magnitude of the correlation highlights the noteworthy nature of this linkage, prompting us to reflect on the role of nomenclature in shaping consumer experiences. It is an endeavor worthy of further exploration, akin to the unearthing of hidden treasures in the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and package delivery preferences. Although we have established the statistical significance of this correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association remain shrouded in mystery, much like the elusive contents of a UPS package en route to a more satisfied Lamar. As we unravel the implications of our findings, we invite readers to join us in this lighthearted journey through the uncharted territory where nomenclature and customer satisfaction intersect, reminiscent of an unpredictable delivery route through the whims of fate and packaging prognostication.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The pronounced correlation between the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS unveils a curious connection that beckons us to delve into the enigmatic intertwining of nomenclature and consumer experiences. Our findings affirm and extend prior research by Smith et al. (2008) and Doe and Jones (2015), who explored the influence of names on individuals' choices and activities, stirring an elated euphony--or perhaps one might say, a "lullabuddy" of resonance--with our own inquiry. The association between nomenclature and career choices, as elucidated by Smith et al., finds an echo in our revelation of the interplay between the name "Lamar" and service satisfaction, shining a spotlight on the enduring perplexity of naming phenomena.

Drawing from the works of Lorem and Ipsum (2012, 2017), our research situates itself within the intricate mosaic of consumer satisfaction and loyalty, offering a whimsical twist with the discovery of the Lamar-UPS nexus. The varied factors influencing service quality and consumer allegiance intertwine in an unexpected chorus with the emergence of the Lamar-UPS correlation, casting a droll charm on the captivating world of consumer behavior.

Moreover, our study resonates with the spirit of levity and serendipitous connections imbued in popular literature and cultural portrayals. While "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Shipping News" by Annie Proulx captivate readers with narratives distinct from our research focus, they echo the whimsical nature of our findings, infusing an element of humor and intrigue into the fabric of human experiences.

The robustness of the correlation underscores the gravity of this connection, prompting a reflective wink at the role of nomenclature in consumer perceptions. The statistical significance of our findings defies mere coincidence with a playful wink and a nod, leaving us pondering the mysteries akin to the whims and caprices of package delivery. As we unravel the implications of our discoveries, we invite our readers to accompany us on this mischievous jaunt through the labyrinth of consumer behavior and delivery whimsy, akin to a package's unpredictable journey through the confounding corridors of customer satisfaction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lamar and Customer satisfaction with UPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between a person's name and their experiences in daily life has long been a subject of intrigue. From the academic ponderings of nominative determinism to the practical considerations of how a name might impact an individual's prospects, the influence of nomenclature on the human experience is a topic of perpetual fascination. In a similar vein, the field of customer satisfaction research has sought to unravel the myriad factors that contribute to consumer contentment with the products and services they encounter. However, the intersection of these two areas of inquiry has largely remained unexplored, leaving a substantial gap in our understanding of consumer behavior and the whims of destiny.
It is within this captivating context that our research endeavors to investigate the correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with the United Parcel Service (UPS). While on the surface, the connection between a name and a delivery service may appear tenuous at best, our preliminary exploration has unearthed a statistically significant relationship that demands further scrutiny. This seemingly serendipitous link between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction raises intriguing questions about the subtle influences that shape consumer experiences – questions that beckon us to embark on a curious journey through the realms of nomenclatural notability and logistical contentment.
Despite the levity that the juxtaposition of "Lamar" and UPS may elicit, this investigation is underpinned by rigorous empirical analysis and a commitment to unveiling the enigmatic patterns that govern consumer preferences. By delving into the depths of historical data and wielding the formidable tools of statistical inquiry, our research aims to illuminate the peculiar connection between the popularity of the name "Lamar" and the satisfaction of recipients of brown-clad parcels. Through this endeavor, we aspire to not only contribute to the burgeoning field of consumer satisfaction research but also to offer a lighthearted perspective on the curious confluence of nomenclature and delivery service dynamics.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we will unravel the intricacies of our methodology, present the compelling findings of our analysis, and elucidate the implications of our discoveries. As we navigate through the realms of nomenclature and consumer contentment, we invite our readers to join us on this whimsical expedition, where statistical inquiry and name-based musings converge to uncover the unexpected connections that permeate our daily interactions – much like how a UPS delivery driver might navigate the intertwining streets of fate and satisfaction, carrying packages destined for a more contented Lamar.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found a substantial correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. The correlation coefficient of 0.7348114 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate entities. The r-squared value of 0.5399477 further underscores the robustness of this association, suggesting that the prominence of the name "Lamar" explains over 53% of the variance in UPS customer satisfaction. Moreover, the statistical significance at p < 0.01 solidifies the validity of this intriguing connection, leaving little room to attribute our findings to mere happenstance. Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot depicting the striking correlation between the two variables, providing a visual representation of this remarkable relationship.
The magnitude of the correlation highlights the noteworthy nature of this linkage, prompting us to reflect on the role of nomenclature in shaping consumer experiences. It is an endeavor worthy of further exploration, akin to the unearthing of hidden treasures in the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and package delivery preferences. Although we have established the statistical significance of this correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association remain shrouded in mystery, much like the elusive contents of a UPS package en route to a more satisfied Lamar. As we unravel the implications of our findings, we invite readers to join us in this lighthearted journey through the uncharted territory where nomenclature and customer satisfaction intersect, reminiscent of an unpredictable delivery route through the whims of fate and packaging prognostication.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a compelling correlation between the prevalence of the name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, coupled with the r-squared value of 0.5399477 and the statistical significance at p < 0.01, firmly establishes the noteworthy nature of this connection. This unexpected association between nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction beckons us to contemplate the intriguing ways in which our names may influence our experiences in the world – a sentimental journey through the vicissitudes of appellation allocation, much like how a delivery package may traverse an unpredictable route to its recipient.

The astounding statistical link we have uncovered calls for further investigation into the mechanisms that underpin this connection. While we have shed light on this enigmatic relationship, the underlying reasons for the pronounced correlation remain as mysterious as the contents of a UPS delivery, perpetually intriguing and gently teasing our curiosity.

In the pantheon of peculiar pairings, the congruence of Lamar and UPS customer satisfaction stands as a testament to the whimsical intricacies of consumer experiences. As we navigate the confluence of nomenclature and logistical contentment, we have unearthed a treasure trove of statistical intrigue, offering a lighthearted perspective on the curious interplay of names and package delivery proclivities.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, some mysteries are best left to the imagination, much like the inexplicable joy that arises when a delivery arrives promptly and delights a contented Lamar.

Continued inquiries into the relationship between nomenclature and consumer satisfaction must now venture into uncharted realms, seeking other improbable pairings that captivate the whimsical fancy of the academic mind. The saga of Lamar and UPS customer satisfaction, though enlightening and delightful, must now take its place in the annals of statistical curiosities, reminding us of the playful and unexpected connections that pepper our wondrous world.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Offbeat Criminology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Interdisciplinary Institute for Irreverent Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lighthearted Larceny: Lamentable Links between Lamar and UPS with an abstract of This paper investigates the perplexing intersection of nomenclature and delivery service satisfaction, by examining the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Lamar" and customer satisfaction with UPS. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the American Customer Satisfaction Index spanning the years 1994 to 2021, our research team delved into this curious connection. The analysis reveals a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7348114, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, indicating a remarkably striking association between the two seemingly unrelated domains. While our study provides empirical evidence of the link, the underlying mechanisms remain shrouded in mystery – much like the contents of a UPS package on its way to a more satisfied Lamar. This investigation sheds light on an unexplored facet of consumer behavior, while also offering a lighthearted glimpse into the enigmatic world of delivery service statistics.

ChatGPT:

"Lamar popularity," "UPS customer satisfaction," "nomenclature correlation," "delivery service statistics," "consumer behavior correlation," "UPS satisfaction factors," "Lamar association," "naming trends study," "UPS customer data," "Lamar empirical evidence"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lamar
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lamar
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lamar

Customer satisfaction with UPS
Source: American Customer Satisfaction Index
See what else correlates with Customer satisfaction with UPS

Correlation r = 0.7348114 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5399477 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 54% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Customer satisfaction with UPS) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lamar) over the 28 years from 1994 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.5E-6. 0.0000084762404586795450000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 0.00085% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 117,977 random variables You don't actually need 117 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 27 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 27 because we have two variables measured over a period of 28 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Lamar (Babies born)372306296323251256286288242238268303353356332323361352317376318337289286234221200163
Customer satisfaction with UPS (Consumer Satisfaction)82838782777981788079808283818382828581848282808182797675




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([372,306,296,323,251,256,286,288,242,238,268,303,353,356,332,323,361,352,317,376,318,337,289,286,234,221,200,163,])
array_2 = np.array([82,83,87,82,77,79,81,78,80,79,80,82,83,81,83,82,82,85,81,84,82,82,80,81,82,79,76,75,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lamar"
array_2_name = "Customer satisfaction with UPS"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1155 · Black Variable ID: 3275 · Red Variable ID: 19839
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0