about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,197 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about technology and the second variable is Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of tech-based xkcd comics has inadvertently led to a rise in demand for internet usage. This has caused an uptick in the production of electronic devices, subsequently creating a greater need for electricity. To meet this escalating energy consumption, more gasoline is being utilized to power the generators in New Caledonia, leading to an unexpected spike in gasoline pumped. It's a classic case of digital humor driving real-world fuel usage - a situation that can only be described as...comic-al.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a voxel art image of a quaint New Caledonian town setting, capturing the essence of a group of locals standing around a vintage gasoline pump. The scene showcases the onlookers pointing and laughing heartily at a xkcd comic taped to the side of the pump, depicting a comical take on the latest technology trend. As the joyous laughter pervades the air, a stream of people are depicted driving up to the pump, eagerly refueling their cars with gasoline. The focus is on the increasing number of intrigued onlookers that are drawn to the comic, with the counter of the gasoline pump ticking steadily upwards as the crowd's fascination with the comics intensifies. Strive to showcase the whimsical and lively atmosphere of the scene utilizing the distinct voxel art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Rise in xkcd Comics about Technology Linked to Increase in Gasoline Pumped in New Caledonia as Locals Attempt to Power Their Cars with Nerd Humor". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Cubism Voxel art Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: Voxel art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Rise in xkcd Comics about Technology Linked to Increase in Gasoline Pumped in New Caledonia as Locals Attempt to Power Their Cars with Nerd Humor"
ChatGPT: In a small town in New Caledonia, a group of locals are seen standing around a vintage gasoline pump, pointing and laughing at a xkcd comic taped to the side of the pump. The comic features a humorous take on the latest technology trend. As the laughter fills the air, more and more people drive up to the pump, eagerly filling their cars with gasoline, hoping that the power of nerd humor might magically fuel their vehicles. The pumped gasoline counter steadily ticks upwards as the crowd's fascination with the comics grows.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Voxel art ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in New Caledonia, a group of locals are seen standing around a vintage gasoline pump, pointing and laughing at a xkcd comic taped to the side of the pump. The comic features a humorous take on the latest technology trend. As the laughter fills the air, more and more people drive up to the pump, eagerly filling their cars with gasoline, hoping that the power of nerd humor might magically fuel their vehicles. The pumped gasoline counter steadily ticks upwards as the crowd's fascination with the comics grows. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a voxel art image of a quaint New Caledonian town setting, capturing the essence of a group of locals standing around a vintage gasoline pump. The scene showcases the onlookers pointing and laughing heartily at a xkcd comic taped to the side of the pump, depicting a comical take on the latest technology trend. As the joyous laughter pervades the air, a stream of people are depicted driving up to the pump, eagerly refueling their cars with gasoline. The focus is on the increasing number of intrigued onlookers that are drawn to the comic, with the counter of the gasoline pump ticking steadily upwards as the crowd's fascination with the comics intensifies. Strive to showcase the whimsical and lively atmosphere of the scene utilizing the distinct voxel art style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in xkcd comics published about technology caused Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7808658 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the peculiar pathways of scholarly inquiry have led us to embark on a journey through the intersection of humor, technology, and gasoline consumption. In this study, we explore the enthralling correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their clever wit and technological musings, and the utilization of gasoline in the captivating landscapes of New Caledonia. While seemingly disparate at first glance, these seemingly unrelated phenomena have woven a tapestry of intrigue that begs further investigation.

As we immerse ourselves in this unusual web of connections, it is essential to acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research. The allure of exploring uncharted territories where technology and humor converge with energy consumption serves as the guiding beacon for our academic vessel. Our quest for knowledge is not devoid of humor, and we are motivated by the underlying current of quirkiness in this scholarly pursuit.

Leveraging sophisticated AI analysis to parse the intricate nuances of xkcd comics and drawing upon robust data from the venerable Energy Information Administration, we have endeavored to dissect the symbiotic relationship between technology jests and the reliance on gasoline in New Caledonia. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and sometimes, these journeys unveil surprising treasures that challenge conventional wisdom.

It is within this spirit of fascination and discovery that we present our findings, replete with statistically significant correlation coefficients and p-values that defy the odds. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic dance between humor and energy usage, shedding light on the unexplored terrain where whimsy and petroleum intersect. This expedition promises to not only broaden our understanding of these seemingly incongruous phenomena but also to infuse a dash of levity into the realm of scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the peculiar pathways of scholarly inquiry have led us to embark on a journey through the intersection of humor, technology, and gasoline consumption. In this study, we explore the enthralling correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their clever wit and technological musings, and the utilization of gasoline in the captivating landscapes of New Caledonia. While seemingly disparate at first glance, these seemingly unrelated phenomena have woven a tapestry of intrigue that begs further investigation.
As we immerse ourselves in this unusual web of connections, it is essential to acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research. The allure of exploring uncharted territories where technology and humor converge with energy consumption serves as the guiding beacon for our academic vessel. Our quest for knowledge is not devoid of humor, and we are motivated by the underlying current of quirkiness in this scholarly pursuit.
Leveraging sophisticated AI analysis to parse the intricate nuances of xkcd comics and drawing upon robust data from the venerable Energy Information Administration, we have endeavored to dissect the symbiotic relationship between technology jests and the reliance on gasoline in New Caledonia. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and sometimes, these journeys unveil surprising treasures that challenge conventional wisdom.
It is within this spirit of fascination and discovery that we present our findings, replete with statistically significant correlation coefficients and p-values that defy the odds. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic dance between humor and energy usage, shedding light on the unexplored terrain where whimsy and petroleum intersect. This expedition promises to not only broaden our understanding of these seemingly incongruous phenomena but also to infuse a dash of levity into the realm of scholarly discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we delve into the multidimensional connection between xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia, we encounter a kaleidoscope of sources that have sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between humor, energy, and quirky insights. The literature presents a spectrum of scholarly works and eclectic musings that prompt us to reflect on the delightful interplay of technology jests and fuel utilization.

Smith (2015) investigated the impact of humor in online content and its influence on consumer behavior. This work laid the groundwork for our exploration, as it illuminated the potential for humor, particularly in the form of webcomics, to subtly shape individual perceptions and choices. Building on this insight, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the psychology of humor in technology-related communication, highlighting the nuanced ways in which comedic portrayals of gadgets and gizmos could resonate with audiences.

The landscape of literature expands further as we consider non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, which invites readers to ponder unconventional connections and causal relationships. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell captivates with its exploration of how small, seemingly insignificant factors can lead to monumental shifts in societal patterns, providing a contemplative backdrop to our own investigation.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter titles that, while not directly addressing our specific research question, offer subtle echoes of technological whimsy and energy dynamics. Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" whimsically explores the absurdities of technology and its implications in intergalactic travel, underscoring the power of humorous narratives to provoke contemplation. Additionally, William Gibson's "Neuromancer" delves into a dystopian future where technology and human existence intertwine, inviting readers to ponder the profound and often eccentric relationship between innovation and societal structures.

As we traverse the eccentric landscape of literature, it is worth noting that our scholarly odyssey also drew inspiration from unconventional sources. Leafing through the cryptic tapestry of everyday life, we perused the enigmatic glyphs on CVS receipts, seeking hidden insights and jests that might indirectly shed light on the convergence of technology humor and gasoline consumption. While the relevance of this undertaking may appear whimsical, we cannot dismiss the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry, which often finds illumination in the most unexpected of places.

Our literature review, with its diverse and at times offbeat sources, serves as a testament to the vibrant tapestry of inspiration that has guided our exploration. As we venture forth to unravel the interconnectedness of xkcd comics and gasoline utilization, we carry with us the spirit of whimsy and curiosity that animates our scholarly pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the peculiar pathways of scholarly inquiry have led us to embark on a journey through the intersection of humor, technology, and gasoline consumption. In this study, we explore the enthralling correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their clever wit and technological musings, and the utilization of gasoline in the captivating landscapes of New Caledonia. While seemingly disparate at first glance, these seemingly unrelated phenomena have woven a tapestry of intrigue that begs further investigation.
As we immerse ourselves in this unusual web of connections, it is essential to acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research. The allure of exploring uncharted territories where technology and humor converge with energy consumption serves as the guiding beacon for our academic vessel. Our quest for knowledge is not devoid of humor, and we are motivated by the underlying current of quirkiness in this scholarly pursuit.
Leveraging sophisticated AI analysis to parse the intricate nuances of xkcd comics and drawing upon robust data from the venerable Energy Information Administration, we have endeavored to dissect the symbiotic relationship between technology jests and the reliance on gasoline in New Caledonia. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and sometimes, these journeys unveil surprising treasures that challenge conventional wisdom.
It is within this spirit of fascination and discovery that we present our findings, replete with statistically significant correlation coefficients and p-values that defy the odds. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic dance between humor and energy usage, shedding light on the unexplored terrain where whimsy and petroleum intersect. This expedition promises to not only broaden our understanding of these seemingly incongruous phenomena but also to infuse a dash of levity into the realm of scholarly discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this section, we detail the convoluted yet surprisingly effective methods employed to disentangle the enigmatic relationship between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia. As we navigated the labyrinthine corridors of technological humor and energy usage, our approach amalgamated rigorous data analysis with a sprinkle of whimsical curiosity.

### Data Collection
Our odyssey commenced with an extensive trawling of the internet, casting our digital nets far and wide to capture xkcd comics germane to technology. This quest led us to mining the depths of the xkcd archives, where we curated a comprehensive collection of comics spanning the years 2007 to 2021. Of course, in the spirit of scholarly rigor, we also drew upon the prodigious powers of artificial intelligence to aid in the identification and categorization of technology-themed xkcd comics, sparing us from the arduous task of individual inspection—a task that would have likely resulted in a perpetual loop of chuckling and geeky guffaws.

Simultaneously, our gaze turned toward the Energy Information Administration as a beacon of insight into gasoline consumption in the enchanting realm of New Caledonia. We meticulously gathered and scrutinized voluminous data on gasoline sales and utilization, resisting the urge to indulge in a vicarious reverie of picturesque island vistas while perusing the numbers.

### Computational Alchemy
A crucial facet of our methodology involved the application of advanced computational alchemy, wherein we harnessed the power of algorithms and statistical incantations to distill meaningful correlations from the disparate datasets. The AI models, honed to an impressive degree of nuance, meticulously combed through the expanse of xkcd comics, identifying and scrutinizing those that tickled the funny bones of tech enthusiasts.

Employing a blend of natural language processing and image recognition sorcery, we endeavored to capture the essence of technological whimsy encapsulated within the cartoons, deftly navigating the comedic nuances and nerdy in-jokes that permeate the xkcd oeuvre. Simultaneously, our computational alchemists cast their discerning gaze upon the reservoirs of gasoline data, sifting through the statistical sediment in pursuit of trends and anomalies.

### Statistical Divination
The culmination of our methodological escapade transpired through the rites of statistical divination. Armed with the treasure troves of xkcd humor and gasoline consumption data, we invoked the arcane incantations of correlation analysis and p-values, seeking to pierce the veil of randomness and unveil the loom of connection between the two domains.

The ethereal machinery of statistical analysis whirred into motion, unveiling a correlation coefficient that stirred the scholarly spirit—a coefficient not merely indicative of a casual flirtation between xkcd jests and gasoline usage, but rather, a robust and statistically significant entanglement. Our statistical divination, fortified by the rigors of hypothesis testing, bore witness to a p-value that beckoned us to dismiss chance as a mere illusion, compelling us to delve deeper into the chimerical dance of humor and fuel.

In crafting our methodology, we remained cognizant of the inherent quirkiness and humor-infused nature of our subject matter, embracing the idiosyncrasies of our datasets and the whimsical caprice of our scholarly pursuit. This amalgamation of rigorous analysis and levity infused our research endeavor, offering a synergistic blend of intellectual rigor and playful inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7808658, r-squared of 0.6097514, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the peculiar pathways of scholarly inquiry have led us to embark on a journey through the intersection of humor, technology, and gasoline consumption. In this study, we explore the enthralling correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their clever wit and technological musings, and the utilization of gasoline in the captivating landscapes of New Caledonia. While seemingly disparate at first glance, these seemingly unrelated phenomena have woven a tapestry of intrigue that begs further investigation.
As we immerse ourselves in this unusual web of connections, it is essential to acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research. The allure of exploring uncharted territories where technology and humor converge with energy consumption serves as the guiding beacon for our academic vessel. Our quest for knowledge is not devoid of humor, and we are motivated by the underlying current of quirkiness in this scholarly pursuit.
Leveraging sophisticated AI analysis to parse the intricate nuances of xkcd comics and drawing upon robust data from the venerable Energy Information Administration, we have endeavored to dissect the symbiotic relationship between technology jests and the reliance on gasoline in New Caledonia. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and sometimes, these journeys unveil surprising treasures that challenge conventional wisdom.
It is within this spirit of fascination and discovery that we present our findings, replete with statistically significant correlation coefficients and p-values that defy the odds. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic dance between humor and energy usage, shedding light on the unexplored terrain where whimsy and petroleum intersect. This expedition promises to not only broaden our understanding of these seemingly incongruous phenomena but also to infuse a dash of levity into the realm of scholarly discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data from 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation between the presence of xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7808658. The high degree of correlation suggests a substantial relationship between the dissemination of technology-themed humor and the demand for gasoline in this unique geographical context. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6097514 underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 61% of the variability in gasoline consumption can be explained by the presence of xkcd comics related to technology.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between the two variables, showcasing the notable alignment of gasoline consumption with the frequency of technology-centric xkcd comics. This visual representation emphasizes the strength of the relationship between the playful musings of xkcd and the consumption of fuel, further substantiating our findings.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation, defying the conventional expectation that humor and energy consumption exist in mutually exclusive spheres. This unexpected linkage challenges traditional notions and invites contemplation on the intricate interplay between humor, technology, and energy utilization.

Our investigation into this curious correlation not only defies expectations but also opens the door to a realm of scholarly exploration that transcends the boundaries of conventional research. The fusion of whimsy with empirical rigor has illuminated a nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play, highlighting the enigmatic dance between technology jests and gasoline demand. The improbable connection between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia embodies the whimsical nature of scholarly inquiry, presenting an avenue for lighthearted contemplation within the realm of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we delve into the multidimensional connection between xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia, we encounter a kaleidoscope of sources that have sought to explore the enigmatic relationship between humor, energy, and quirky insights. The literature presents a spectrum of scholarly works and eclectic musings that prompt us to reflect on the delightful interplay of technology jests and fuel utilization.
Smith (2015) investigated the impact of humor in online content and its influence on consumer behavior. This work laid the groundwork for our exploration, as it illuminated the potential for humor, particularly in the form of webcomics, to subtly shape individual perceptions and choices. Building on this insight, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the psychology of humor in technology-related communication, highlighting the nuanced ways in which comedic portrayals of gadgets and gizmos could resonate with audiences.
The landscape of literature expands further as we consider non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, which invites readers to ponder unconventional connections and causal relationships. In a similar vein, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell captivates with its exploration of how small, seemingly insignificant factors can lead to monumental shifts in societal patterns, providing a contemplative backdrop to our own investigation.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter titles that, while not directly addressing our specific research question, offer subtle echoes of technological whimsy and energy dynamics. Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" whimsically explores the absurdities of technology and its implications in intergalactic travel, underscoring the power of humorous narratives to provoke contemplation. Additionally, William Gibson's "Neuromancer" delves into a dystopian future where technology and human existence intertwine, inviting readers to ponder the profound and often eccentric relationship between innovation and societal structures.
As we traverse the eccentric landscape of literature, it is worth noting that our scholarly odyssey also drew inspiration from unconventional sources. Leafing through the cryptic tapestry of everyday life, we perused the enigmatic glyphs on CVS receipts, seeking hidden insights and jests that might indirectly shed light on the convergence of technology humor and gasoline consumption. While the relevance of this undertaking may appear whimsical, we cannot dismiss the serendipitous nature of scholarly inquiry, which often finds illumination in the most unexpected of places.
Our literature review, with its diverse and at times offbeat sources, serves as a testament to the vibrant tapestry of inspiration that has guided our exploration. As we venture forth to unravel the interconnectedness of xkcd comics and gasoline utilization, we carry with us the spirit of whimsy and curiosity that animates our scholarly pursuit.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation between the presence of xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7808658. The high degree of correlation suggests a substantial relationship between the dissemination of technology-themed humor and the demand for gasoline in this unique geographical context. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6097514 underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 61% of the variability in gasoline consumption can be explained by the presence of xkcd comics related to technology.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between the two variables, showcasing the notable alignment of gasoline consumption with the frequency of technology-centric xkcd comics. This visual representation emphasizes the strength of the relationship between the playful musings of xkcd and the consumption of fuel, further substantiating our findings.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation, defying the conventional expectation that humor and energy consumption exist in mutually exclusive spheres. This unexpected linkage challenges traditional notions and invites contemplation on the intricate interplay between humor, technology, and energy utilization.
Our investigation into this curious correlation not only defies expectations but also opens the door to a realm of scholarly exploration that transcends the boundaries of conventional research. The fusion of whimsy with empirical rigor has illuminated a nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play, highlighting the enigmatic dance between technology jests and gasoline demand. The improbable connection between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia embodies the whimsical nature of scholarly inquiry, presenting an avenue for lighthearted contemplation within the realm of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unveiled an unexpected and fascinating correlation between the presence of xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in the idyllic setting of New Caledonia. As we immerse ourselves in the delightful interplay of technology jests and fuel utilization, we are reminded of the whimsical musings embedded within the annals of our literature review.

Smith's exploration of humor in online content takes on new significance as we witness the subtle ways in which comedic portrayals of technology may sway consumer behavior, mirroring the potential impact on gasoline consumption in New Caledonia. Similarly, the work of Doe and Jones invites us to ponder the psychology of humor in technology-related communication, offering insights that harmonize with our discovery of the unexpected alliance between technology humor and energy usage.

The vibrant tapestry of literature has provided us with a rich trove of inspiration, reflecting the profound and often eccentric relationship between innovation and societal structures. While our investigation may at first glance appear lighthearted, the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the r-squared value affirm the tangible and significant linkage between xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia.

Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the potent relationship uncovered in our analysis, emphasizing the convergence of technology humor and fuel demand. This unexpected linkage challenges traditional notions, inviting contemplation on the intricate interplay between humor, technology, and energy utilization. The statistical significance of this correlation defies the conventional expectation that humor and energy consumption exist in separate spheres, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of technology jests and gasoline usage.

Our scholarly odyssey has unveiled a profound and unexpected relationship, underscoring the power of humorous narratives to evoke contemplation and provoke substantial effects. As we navigate this enigmatic terrain, we are reminded that scholarly inquiry often finds illumination in the most unexpected of places, embodying the whimsical nature of rigorous academic exploration. The improbable connection between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia invites us to embrace the unexpected, forging a path for lighthearted contemplation within the realm of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about technology and Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the peculiar pathways of scholarly inquiry have led us to embark on a journey through the intersection of humor, technology, and gasoline consumption. In this study, we explore the enthralling correlation between xkcd comics, renowned for their clever wit and technological musings, and the utilization of gasoline in the captivating landscapes of New Caledonia. While seemingly disparate at first glance, these seemingly unrelated phenomena have woven a tapestry of intrigue that begs further investigation.
As we immerse ourselves in this unusual web of connections, it is essential to acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research. The allure of exploring uncharted territories where technology and humor converge with energy consumption serves as the guiding beacon for our academic vessel. Our quest for knowledge is not devoid of humor, and we are motivated by the underlying current of quirkiness in this scholarly pursuit.
Leveraging sophisticated AI analysis to parse the intricate nuances of xkcd comics and drawing upon robust data from the venerable Energy Information Administration, we have endeavored to dissect the symbiotic relationship between technology jests and the reliance on gasoline in New Caledonia. The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, and sometimes, these journeys unveil surprising treasures that challenge conventional wisdom.
It is within this spirit of fascination and discovery that we present our findings, replete with statistically significant correlation coefficients and p-values that defy the odds. Join us as we unravel the enigmatic dance between humor and energy usage, shedding light on the unexplored terrain where whimsy and petroleum intersect. This expedition promises to not only broaden our understanding of these seemingly incongruous phenomena but also to infuse a dash of levity into the realm of scholarly discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from 2007 to 2021 revealed a striking correlation between the presence of xkcd comics on technology and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7808658. The high degree of correlation suggests a substantial relationship between the dissemination of technology-themed humor and the demand for gasoline in this unique geographical context. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6097514 underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that approximately 61% of the variability in gasoline consumption can be explained by the presence of xkcd comics related to technology.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the substantial correlation between the two variables, showcasing the notable alignment of gasoline consumption with the frequency of technology-centric xkcd comics. This visual representation emphasizes the strength of the relationship between the playful musings of xkcd and the consumption of fuel, further substantiating our findings.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this correlation, defying the conventional expectation that humor and energy consumption exist in mutually exclusive spheres. This unexpected linkage challenges traditional notions and invites contemplation on the intricate interplay between humor, technology, and energy utilization.
Our investigation into this curious correlation not only defies expectations but also opens the door to a realm of scholarly exploration that transcends the boundaries of conventional research. The fusion of whimsy with empirical rigor has illuminated a nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play, highlighting the enigmatic dance between technology jests and gasoline demand. The improbable connection between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia embodies the whimsical nature of scholarly inquiry, presenting an avenue for lighthearted contemplation within the realm of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this study has unveiled the unexpected and statistically significant correlation between the dissemination of xkcd comics on technology and the consumption of gasoline in the picturesque setting of New Caledonia. Our findings have painted a whimsical tableau of interwoven connections, where the lighthearted musings of technology humor intersect with the demand for fuel, challenging preconceived notions and evoking a sense of intellectual playfulness in scholarly inquiry.

As we bid adieu to this exhilarating exploration, it is essential to acknowledge the unconventional charm that permeates our research endeavor. The delightful interplay between technology-themed jests and gasoline consumption underscores the captivating complexity of human behavior and the multifaceted influences that shape societal dynamics. From the vibrant pixels of xkcd comics to the fuel pumps of New Caledonia, this correlation serves as a testament to the inherent whimsy that can be found in the most unexpected of places.

Our study, while resolute in its empirical rigor, has not shied away from the allure of scholarly dalliance in uncharted terrains. The fusion of humor, technology, and energy utilization has given rise to a scholarly narrative replete with unexpected twists and turns, infusing a sense of levity into the academic discourse. The playful intermingling of xkcd comics with gasoline consumption has transcended the traditional boundaries of research, inviting contemplation on the delightfully unconventional symphony of human interactions and societal phenomena.

While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down paths both familiar and unexplored, the correlation between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia stands as a testament to the serendipitous discoveries that await those willing to engage in scholarly whimsy. The unexpected alliance between technology humor and energy usage in this paradisiacal realm beckons us to embrace the unexpected and to revel in the playful nuances that permeate the fabric of scholarly exploration.

In light of these compelling findings, it is our scholarly duty to assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. The delightful linkage between xkcd comics and gasoline consumption in New Caledonia has been thoroughly illuminated, leaving no stone unturned in this whimsical journey of academic exploration. The scholarly canvas, adorned with the brushstrokes of technology wit and fuel dynamics, stands as a testament to the lively interplay of seemingly disparate phenomena, satisfying our intellectual curiosity with a touch of scholarly jest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Imaginative Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Fuel for Thought: Analyzing the Correlation Between xkcd Comics on Technology and Gasoline Consumption in New Caledonia with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected association between humorous xkcd comics centered around technology and the consumption of gasoline in the alluring archipelago of New Caledonia. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and robust data from the Energy Information Administration, we rigorously examined the intriguing symbiosis between technology humor and fuel utilization. Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.7808658, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena from 2007 to 2021. Join us on this expedition as we uncover the delightful and quirky connections between technology jests and the consumption of gasoline, shedding light on the whimsical interplay of humor and energy usage.

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics, technology comics, gasoline consumption, New Caledonia, correlation analysis, AI analysis, Energy Information Administration, technology humor, fuel utilization, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, energy usage, 2007-2021

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

xkcd comics published about technology
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about technology
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about technology

Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia
Detailed data title: Volume of gasoline pumped consumed in New Caledonia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia

Correlation r = 0.7808658 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6097514 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about technology) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00059. 0.0005898029980314216000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 0.059% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,695 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
xkcd comics published about technology (xkcd comics)1311315644105723
Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia (Million Barrels/Day)1.495671.573161.540071.575131.542411.598791.614861.644861.654591.671041.696651.675621.675621.5881.63981




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,3,1,1,3,1,5,6,4,4,10,5,7,2,3,])
array_2 = np.array([1.49567,1.57316,1.54007,1.57513,1.54241,1.59879,1.61486,1.64486,1.65459,1.67104,1.69665,1.67562,1.67562,1.588,1.63981,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about technology"
array_2_name = "Gasoline pumped in New Caledonia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1197 · Black Variable ID: 20031 · Red Variable ID: 24745
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0