about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,290 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the second variable is Google searches for 'no cap'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the forensic science technician population grew in Georgia, so did their expertise in uncovering the truth. Their penchant for digging deeper and their ability to 'forensically' analyze situations led to a surge in instances where people were caught without their 'cap,' leading to the popularization of the phrase "no cap" to denote their inability to cover up their tracks. Looks like in Georgia, even the detectives couldn't resist a good pun!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic forensics lab bustling with activity in Georgia. Show a high-tech, sleek environment with neon lighting, holographic displays, and advanced equipment. Depict multiple forensic science technicians in specialized gear examining evidence under intense, futuristic magnifying glasses and cutting-edge analytical machines. Capture the collaboration and efficiency of the technicians as they work seamlessly together, sharing data and findings in real-time through the aid of advanced technology. Enhance the visual with an atmosphere of heightened precision and sophistication, reflecting the advancement in forensic techniques and the surge in productivity due to the increased workforce. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because as the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia increases, more individuals become skilled at identifying evidence from crime scenes. This rise in expertise leads to more accurate and efficient identification of "no cap" or "no lie" evidence, prompting an increase in searches related to "no cap" as people become more aware of the validity of the evidence presented.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Hyper-realistic Futuristic Cubism
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because as the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia increases, more individuals become skilled at identifying evidence from crime scenes. This rise in expertise leads to more accurate and efficient identification of "no cap" or "no lie" evidence, prompting an increase in searches related to "no cap" as people become more aware of the validity of the evidence presented.
ChatGPT: Picture a busy forensics lab in Georgia where the number of forensic science technicians has doubled. As a result, there are more people diligently examining evidence under bright lights and magnifying glasses. With the increase in manpower, the technicians are becoming more adept at identifying important clues and presenting "no cap" evidence, leading to an uptick in the number of searches related to "no cap." The technicians are methodically working and communicating with each other, resulting in a more efficient and accurate identification process.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: Picture a busy forensics lab in Georgia where the number of forensic science technicians has doubled. As a result, there are more people diligently examining evidence under bright lights and magnifying glasses. With the increase in manpower, the technicians are becoming more adept at identifying important clues and presenting "no cap" evidence, leading to an uptick in the number of searches related to "no cap." The technicians are methodically working and communicating with each other, resulting in a more efficient and accurate identification process. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic forensics lab bustling with activity in Georgia. Show a high-tech, sleek environment with neon lighting, holographic displays, and advanced equipment. Depict multiple forensic science technicians in specialized gear examining evidence under intense, futuristic magnifying glasses and cutting-edge analytical machines. Capture the collaboration and efficiency of the technicians as they work seamlessly together, sharing data and findings in real-time through the aid of advanced technology. Enhance the visual with an atmosphere of heightened precision and sophistication, reflecting the advancement in forensic techniques and the surge in productivity due to the increased workforce.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia caused no cap (Google searches for 'no cap') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'

The Journal of Forensic Linguistics and Cultural Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of forensic science and internet linguistics may seem improbable at first glance, akin to the unlikely partnership of Sherlock Holmes and a stand-up comedian, but it is precisely this unexpected juxtaposition that forms the basis of our investigation. As society hurtles forward into the digital age, the ways in which we interact with the world around us have become increasingly interconnected, unveiling surprising parallels and associations that defy conventional expectations. The purpose of this study is to delve into the perplexing correlation between a very specific occupational group, namely forensic science technicians in Georgia, and the widespread usage of the colloquial expression 'no cap' within the digital realm.

Forensic science technicians occupy a vital role in the criminal justice system, utilizing their expertise to analyze physical evidence and unravel complex mysteries. Meanwhile, the phrase 'no cap', originally originating from hip-hop culture as a declaration of honesty and sincerity, has evolved into a ubiquitous component of modern vernacular, permeating social media platforms and everyday conversations. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated entities prompts a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a fingerprint at a comedy club.

To that end, the study leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to outline the fluctuating population of forensic science technicians in Georgia, while also harnessing the power of Google Trends to quantify the ebbs and flows of 'no cap' searches over time. Initial explorations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2021, indicating a surprisingly robust statistical relationship between these divergent phenomena. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself had cracked the case, albeit in a slightly unconventional manner.

As we embark on this quirky quest for insight, our aim is not only to unravel the numeric ties between these entities but also to uncover the broader implications of their coexistence. By unraveling this peculiar correlation, we hope to shed light on the unexpected confluence of professional domains and contemporary linguistic trends, perhaps revealing that the truth may not only be stranger than fiction but also sometimes accompanied by a sly laugh and a cleverly worded quip.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of forensic science and internet linguistics may seem improbable at first glance, akin to the unlikely partnership of Sherlock Holmes and a stand-up comedian, but it is precisely this unexpected juxtaposition that forms the basis of our investigation. As society hurtles forward into the digital age, the ways in which we interact with the world around us have become increasingly interconnected, unveiling surprising parallels and associations that defy conventional expectations. The purpose of this study is to delve into the perplexing correlation between a very specific occupational group, namely forensic science technicians in Georgia, and the widespread usage of the colloquial expression 'no cap' within the digital realm.
Forensic science technicians occupy a vital role in the criminal justice system, utilizing their expertise to analyze physical evidence and unravel complex mysteries. Meanwhile, the phrase 'no cap', originally originating from hip-hop culture as a declaration of honesty and sincerity, has evolved into a ubiquitous component of modern vernacular, permeating social media platforms and everyday conversations. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated entities prompts a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a fingerprint at a comedy club.
To that end, the study leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to outline the fluctuating population of forensic science technicians in Georgia, while also harnessing the power of Google Trends to quantify the ebbs and flows of 'no cap' searches over time. Initial explorations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2021, indicating a surprisingly robust statistical relationship between these divergent phenomena. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself had cracked the case, albeit in a slightly unconventional manner.
As we embark on this quirky quest for insight, our aim is not only to unravel the numeric ties between these entities but also to uncover the broader implications of their coexistence. By unraveling this peculiar correlation, we hope to shed light on the unexpected confluence of professional domains and contemporary linguistic trends, perhaps revealing that the truth may not only be stranger than fiction but also sometimes accompanied by a sly laugh and a cleverly worded quip.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Upon delving into the extensive body of literature related to forensic science technicians and internet culture, a smorgasbord of diverse findings, theories, and, dare we say, puns, emerged. Smith (2015) delves into the intricate world of forensic science, meticulously outlining the methodologies and techniques employed by practitioners in the field. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) offers a comprehensive exploration of internet slang and linguistic evolution, providing a nuanced understanding of colloquial expressions in the digital sphere. Jones (2020) investigates the intersection of popular culture and professional occupations, offering insightful perspectives on the unanticipated convergence of seemingly disparate domains.

Turning to non-fiction books, "Forensic Science: From the Crime Scene to the Crime Lab" by Saferstein (2013) offers a comprehensive overview of the principles and practices of forensic science, while "The Slang and Jargon of Hip-Hop" by Williams (2017) delves into the evolution of linguistic expressions within hip-hop culture, shedding light on the origins and proliferation of phrases such as 'no cap'. As for fictional literature, the timeless classic "Sherlock Holmes" by Doyle (1892) provides captivating tales of deductive reasoning amid wry humor, resonating with the spirit of unexpected correlations. Likewise, "The Secret Life of Language" by Linguini (2005) presents a whimsical exploration of linguistic oddities and improbable connections, paralleling the spirited nature of our own research pursuits.

Additionally, a scholarly analysis of TV shows, such as "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" and "Forensic Files", further informed our understanding of the forensic science landscape, while immersive excursions into popular culture phenomena, including "The Office" and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine", inspired a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between professional endeavors and contemporary colloquialisms. These eclectic sources provided a rich foundation for contextualizing our inquiry, infusing the serious nature of our study with a dash of levity and mirth.

In this pursuit of uncovering the unexpectedly intertwined realms of forensic science technicians and the digital catchphrase 'no cap', it is imperative to embrace a nuanced and multifaceted approach that juxtaposes scholarly rigor with a lighthearted nod to the whimsical nature of our research endeavor. Building upon this diverse array of literature, we set out to illuminate the idiosyncratic correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the prevalence of 'no cap' searches on the internet, embarking on a quest that is as statistically sound as it is delightfully offbeat.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of forensic science and internet linguistics may seem improbable at first glance, akin to the unlikely partnership of Sherlock Holmes and a stand-up comedian, but it is precisely this unexpected juxtaposition that forms the basis of our investigation. As society hurtles forward into the digital age, the ways in which we interact with the world around us have become increasingly interconnected, unveiling surprising parallels and associations that defy conventional expectations. The purpose of this study is to delve into the perplexing correlation between a very specific occupational group, namely forensic science technicians in Georgia, and the widespread usage of the colloquial expression 'no cap' within the digital realm.
Forensic science technicians occupy a vital role in the criminal justice system, utilizing their expertise to analyze physical evidence and unravel complex mysteries. Meanwhile, the phrase 'no cap', originally originating from hip-hop culture as a declaration of honesty and sincerity, has evolved into a ubiquitous component of modern vernacular, permeating social media platforms and everyday conversations. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated entities prompts a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a fingerprint at a comedy club.
To that end, the study leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to outline the fluctuating population of forensic science technicians in Georgia, while also harnessing the power of Google Trends to quantify the ebbs and flows of 'no cap' searches over time. Initial explorations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2021, indicating a surprisingly robust statistical relationship between these divergent phenomena. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself had cracked the case, albeit in a slightly unconventional manner.
As we embark on this quirky quest for insight, our aim is not only to unravel the numeric ties between these entities but also to uncover the broader implications of their coexistence. By unraveling this peculiar correlation, we hope to shed light on the unexpected confluence of professional domains and contemporary linguistic trends, perhaps revealing that the truth may not only be stranger than fiction but also sometimes accompanied by a sly laugh and a cleverly worded quip.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study encompassed a multidimensional approach to capture the intricate relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the prevalence of Google searches for the phrase 'no cap'. As we ventured forth into the digital landscape and occupational realms, we diligently crafted a series of convoluted yet entertaining methods to ascertain the extent of this unexpected correlation.

First and foremost, we delved into the Bureau of Labor Statistics database to extract comprehensive data regarding the quantity of forensic science technicians within the state of Georgia. This involved perusing through various labor reports, employment surveys, and statistical analyses to compile a longitudinal profile stretching from 2004 to 2021. Our team of intrepid researchers waded through a veritable sea of occupational data, navigating through the statistical thickets much like forensic scientists deciphering a perplexing crime scene.

Simultaneously, our foray into the virtual sphere led us to the illustrious realm of Google Trends, where the ebbs and flows of internet searches were meticulously recorded and analyzed. By inputting the elusive phrase 'no cap' into the Google Trends interface, we unraveled the temporal patterns of its online resonance, observing the peaks and troughs of its popularity with almost forensic precision. The juxtaposition of investigating professional occupations and internet slang hinted at a peculiar amalgamation of academia and memes, replicating the curious fusion of a science laboratory and a comedy club.

Once the comprehensive datasets were secured, our statistical approach employed the venerable tools of correlation analysis to elucidate the potential connection between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the frequency of 'no cap' searches. The Pearson correlation coefficient emerged as our trusty companion in this endeavor, revealing itself as a stalwart ally in unveiling the degree of association between these seemingly disparate domains. Our team wielded this statistical sword with finesse, brandishing it much like Sherlock Holmes might wield his trusty magnifying glass in the hunt for clues.

To fortify our analysis and emphasize the robustness of our findings, we also conducted time series analysis to discern any temporal patterns and enduring trends embedded within the dataset. This multifaceted exploration provided a comprehensive and rigorous framework for unraveling the intricate linkages entwining the solemn world of forensic science and the capricious realm of online colloquialism.

In sum, our foray into the interconnected realms of occupational statistics and internet vernacular employed a vibrant tapestry of methods, ranging from the meticulous scrutiny of labor statistics to the whimsical exploration of digital search trends. The convergence of these diversely eclectic elements mirrored the strange yet fascinating encounter of a forensic science technician stumbling upon an unexpected clue in the world of internet jargon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8524745, r-squared of 0.7267128, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of forensic science and internet linguistics may seem improbable at first glance, akin to the unlikely partnership of Sherlock Holmes and a stand-up comedian, but it is precisely this unexpected juxtaposition that forms the basis of our investigation. As society hurtles forward into the digital age, the ways in which we interact with the world around us have become increasingly interconnected, unveiling surprising parallels and associations that defy conventional expectations. The purpose of this study is to delve into the perplexing correlation between a very specific occupational group, namely forensic science technicians in Georgia, and the widespread usage of the colloquial expression 'no cap' within the digital realm.
Forensic science technicians occupy a vital role in the criminal justice system, utilizing their expertise to analyze physical evidence and unravel complex mysteries. Meanwhile, the phrase 'no cap', originally originating from hip-hop culture as a declaration of honesty and sincerity, has evolved into a ubiquitous component of modern vernacular, permeating social media platforms and everyday conversations. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated entities prompts a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a fingerprint at a comedy club.
To that end, the study leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to outline the fluctuating population of forensic science technicians in Georgia, while also harnessing the power of Google Trends to quantify the ebbs and flows of 'no cap' searches over time. Initial explorations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2021, indicating a surprisingly robust statistical relationship between these divergent phenomena. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself had cracked the case, albeit in a slightly unconventional manner.
As we embark on this quirky quest for insight, our aim is not only to unravel the numeric ties between these entities but also to uncover the broader implications of their coexistence. By unraveling this peculiar correlation, we hope to shed light on the unexpected confluence of professional domains and contemporary linguistic trends, perhaps revealing that the truth may not only be stranger than fiction but also sometimes accompanied by a sly laugh and a cleverly worded quip.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap' yielded intriguing results. The analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7267128 underscored the considerable variance in 'no cap' searches that could be explained by the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation, affirming the statistical significance of the observed relationship.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy positive relationship between these unconventional bedfellows, resembling an unexpected collaboration between a forensic sketch artist and a wordsmith. Despite the peculiarity of the association, the data spoke with convincing clarity, emphasizing the substantial coherence between the professional pursuits of forensic science and the digital fascination with 'no cap'.

The remarkably high correlation coefficient implies that as the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia fluctuated over the years, there was a corresponding parallel shift in the frequency of 'no cap' searches. It's as if the scientific sleuths in Georgia left their distinctive mark not only in crime scene investigations but also in the cyberspace lexicon. This unexpected intersection of forensic science and linguistic colloquialism unveils a fascinating duality in the influence of professional vocations on contemporary culture, akin to a forensic science technician moonlighting as an amateur etymologist.

The significant correlation unveiled in this study beckons for a broader contemplation of the interconnectedness between occupational spheres and online trends, prompting an intellectual musing about the interplay between professional vocations and linguistic evolution. This peculiar union of forensic science and internet vernacular provides an amusing anecdote in the saga of interdisciplinary exploration, reminding us that within the labyrinth of statistical analysis, one may stumble upon unexpected correlations that invite a wry smile and a raised eyebrow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Upon delving into the extensive body of literature related to forensic science technicians and internet culture, a smorgasbord of diverse findings, theories, and, dare we say, puns, emerged. Smith (2015) delves into the intricate world of forensic science, meticulously outlining the methodologies and techniques employed by practitioners in the field. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) offers a comprehensive exploration of internet slang and linguistic evolution, providing a nuanced understanding of colloquial expressions in the digital sphere. Jones (2020) investigates the intersection of popular culture and professional occupations, offering insightful perspectives on the unanticipated convergence of seemingly disparate domains.
Turning to non-fiction books, "Forensic Science: From the Crime Scene to the Crime Lab" by Saferstein (2013) offers a comprehensive overview of the principles and practices of forensic science, while "The Slang and Jargon of Hip-Hop" by Williams (2017) delves into the evolution of linguistic expressions within hip-hop culture, shedding light on the origins and proliferation of phrases such as 'no cap'. As for fictional literature, the timeless classic "Sherlock Holmes" by Doyle (1892) provides captivating tales of deductive reasoning amid wry humor, resonating with the spirit of unexpected correlations. Likewise, "The Secret Life of Language" by Linguini (2005) presents a whimsical exploration of linguistic oddities and improbable connections, paralleling the spirited nature of our own research pursuits.
Additionally, a scholarly analysis of TV shows, such as "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" and "Forensic Files", further informed our understanding of the forensic science landscape, while immersive excursions into popular culture phenomena, including "The Office" and "Brooklyn Nine-Nine", inspired a lighthearted perspective on the interplay between professional endeavors and contemporary colloquialisms. These eclectic sources provided a rich foundation for contextualizing our inquiry, infusing the serious nature of our study with a dash of levity and mirth.
In this pursuit of uncovering the unexpectedly intertwined realms of forensic science technicians and the digital catchphrase 'no cap', it is imperative to embrace a nuanced and multifaceted approach that juxtaposes scholarly rigor with a lighthearted nod to the whimsical nature of our research endeavor. Building upon this diverse array of literature, we set out to illuminate the idiosyncratic correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the prevalence of 'no cap' searches on the internet, embarking on a quest that is as statistically sound as it is delightfully offbeat.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap' yielded intriguing results. The analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7267128 underscored the considerable variance in 'no cap' searches that could be explained by the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation, affirming the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy positive relationship between these unconventional bedfellows, resembling an unexpected collaboration between a forensic sketch artist and a wordsmith. Despite the peculiarity of the association, the data spoke with convincing clarity, emphasizing the substantial coherence between the professional pursuits of forensic science and the digital fascination with 'no cap'.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient implies that as the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia fluctuated over the years, there was a corresponding parallel shift in the frequency of 'no cap' searches. It's as if the scientific sleuths in Georgia left their distinctive mark not only in crime scene investigations but also in the cyberspace lexicon. This unexpected intersection of forensic science and linguistic colloquialism unveils a fascinating duality in the influence of professional vocations on contemporary culture, akin to a forensic science technician moonlighting as an amateur etymologist.
The significant correlation unveiled in this study beckons for a broader contemplation of the interconnectedness between occupational spheres and online trends, prompting an intellectual musing about the interplay between professional vocations and linguistic evolution. This peculiar union of forensic science and internet vernacular provides an amusing anecdote in the saga of interdisciplinary exploration, reminding us that within the labyrinth of statistical analysis, one may stumble upon unexpected correlations that invite a wry smile and a raised eyebrow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study illuminate an intriguing and, dare we say, captivating association between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the frequency of searches for the colloquial expression 'no cap' on the internet. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8524745, along with a p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of a statistically significant connection, underscoring the unexpected convergence of professional pursuits and contemporary linguistic trends.

Our results resonate with prior research efforts that have delved into the quixotic interplay between seemingly disparate domains. As our literature review playfully hinted, the study by Doe (2018) on internet slang and linguistic evolution offered a prescient understanding of the fluid nature of colloquial expressions in the digital sphere. This revelation is particularly poignant in the context of our findings, as the resounding correlation observed between forensic science technicians and the popular online meme 'no cap' vividly exemplifies the evolving landscape of language and its peculiar affiliations.

Furthermore, the comprehensive assessment of popular culture and professional occupations by Jones (2020) prompted a contemplation of the unanticipated convergence of these realms, akin to the unanticipated alignment of forensic science technicians and 'no cap' searches showcased in our study. Indeed, it seems that the professional endeavors of forensic science practitioners have surreptitiously infiltrated the fabric of online vernacular, much like a cryptic fingerprint left behind in the digital realm.

The unexpected nature of our findings, reminiscent of the wry humor and deductive reasoning prevalent in the tales of Sherlock Holmes (Doyle, 1892), not only underscores the spirited nature of our research endeavor but also highlights the unforeseen links that can materialize in the most unexpected of contexts. This study serves as a whimsical yet profound testament to the multifaceted and delightfully unpredictable nature of the interconnected world we inhabit.

In sum, our research has uncovered a delightfully enigmatic correlation that beckons for further exploration and, perhaps, a touch of good-humored contemplation. The unanticipated convergence of forensic science technicians and the digital catchphrase 'no cap' serves as a captivating anecdote that embodies the peculiar and delightful surprises that await within the realm of statistical inquiry. As we conclude this discussion, we are reminded of the words of Linguini (2005) in "The Secret Life of Language", where improbable connections are celebrated with a nod to the curious and the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of forensic science and internet linguistics may seem improbable at first glance, akin to the unlikely partnership of Sherlock Holmes and a stand-up comedian, but it is precisely this unexpected juxtaposition that forms the basis of our investigation. As society hurtles forward into the digital age, the ways in which we interact with the world around us have become increasingly interconnected, unveiling surprising parallels and associations that defy conventional expectations. The purpose of this study is to delve into the perplexing correlation between a very specific occupational group, namely forensic science technicians in Georgia, and the widespread usage of the colloquial expression 'no cap' within the digital realm.
Forensic science technicians occupy a vital role in the criminal justice system, utilizing their expertise to analyze physical evidence and unravel complex mysteries. Meanwhile, the phrase 'no cap', originally originating from hip-hop culture as a declaration of honesty and sincerity, has evolved into a ubiquitous component of modern vernacular, permeating social media platforms and everyday conversations. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly unrelated entities prompts a blend of curiosity and amusement, akin to stumbling upon a fingerprint at a comedy club.
To that end, the study leverages data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to outline the fluctuating population of forensic science technicians in Georgia, while also harnessing the power of Google Trends to quantify the ebbs and flows of 'no cap' searches over time. Initial explorations yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 from 2004 to 2021, indicating a surprisingly robust statistical relationship between these divergent phenomena. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself had cracked the case, albeit in a slightly unconventional manner.
As we embark on this quirky quest for insight, our aim is not only to unravel the numeric ties between these entities but also to uncover the broader implications of their coexistence. By unraveling this peculiar correlation, we hope to shed light on the unexpected confluence of professional domains and contemporary linguistic trends, perhaps revealing that the truth may not only be stranger than fiction but also sometimes accompanied by a sly laugh and a cleverly worded quip.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and Google searches for 'no cap' yielded intriguing results. The analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745, indicating a robust positive association between these seemingly disparate variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.7267128 underscored the considerable variance in 'no cap' searches that could be explained by the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia. The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation, affirming the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the noteworthy positive relationship between these unconventional bedfellows, resembling an unexpected collaboration between a forensic sketch artist and a wordsmith. Despite the peculiarity of the association, the data spoke with convincing clarity, emphasizing the substantial coherence between the professional pursuits of forensic science and the digital fascination with 'no cap'.
The remarkably high correlation coefficient implies that as the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia fluctuated over the years, there was a corresponding parallel shift in the frequency of 'no cap' searches. It's as if the scientific sleuths in Georgia left their distinctive mark not only in crime scene investigations but also in the cyberspace lexicon. This unexpected intersection of forensic science and linguistic colloquialism unveils a fascinating duality in the influence of professional vocations on contemporary culture, akin to a forensic science technician moonlighting as an amateur etymologist.
The significant correlation unveiled in this study beckons for a broader contemplation of the interconnectedness between occupational spheres and online trends, prompting an intellectual musing about the interplay between professional vocations and linguistic evolution. This peculiar union of forensic science and internet vernacular provides an amusing anecdote in the saga of interdisciplinary exploration, reminding us that within the labyrinth of statistical analysis, one may stumble upon unexpected correlations that invite a wry smile and a raised eyebrow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a rather unexpected and whimsical correlation between the number of forensic science technicians in Georgia and the frequency of searches for the colloquial expression 'no cap' on the internet. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021 not only underscores the statistical significance of this correlation but also prompts a curious contemplation of the peculiar interplay between professional occupations and online linguistic trends. It's as if the forensic science technicians in Georgia have left a distinct mark not only in crime scene investigations but also on the digital vernacular landscape, akin to uncovering a hidden message in a cryptic crossword puzzle.

This unforeseen convergence evokes a sense of lighthearted wonder, akin to stumbling upon a witty pun in a serious conversation. The unexpected union of forensic science and internet colloquialism suggests a fascinating duality in the influence of professional vocations on contemporary culture, reminiscent of a detective donning a jester's cap for a brief moment. As we venture into the uncharted territory of statistical exploration, we are reminded that amidst the rigidity of numerical analysis, there exists a playground for the whimsical and the bizarre, not unlike discovering a secret compartment in a staid institution.

This study beckons for a broader contemplation of the peculiar and often overlooked intersections between seemingly unrelated domains, inviting a humorous and light-hearted examination of the intrinsic interconnectedness of our world. However, the unexpected correlation uncovered in this study prompts a whimsical revelation that perhaps statistical analysis itself contains an element of caprice, akin to a mischievous wink from the enigmatic Mona Lisa.

While our findings have shed light on this charming quirk of statistical correlation, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, some mysteries are best left with a sly smile and a knowing nod.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Forensic Linguistics and Cultural Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Applied Anthropological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled No Cap: Exploring the Correlation Between the Number of Forensic Science Technicians in Georgia and Google Searches for 'No Cap' with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the enigmatic world of forensic science technicians and the online fervor for the colloquial expression 'no cap'. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we sought to illuminate the potential relationship between the number of forensic science technicians in the state of Georgia and the frequency of searches for 'no cap' on the internet. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8524745 with a p-value of less than 0.01 during the timeframe of 2004 to 2021. This unexpected connection beckons further investigation into the curious convergence of forensic science pursuits and modern vernacular expressions, prompting a whimsical examination of the interplay between professional occupations and internet culture. Our study underscores the importance of embracing a multidisciplinary approach to uncovering the unusual, and sometimes downright peculiar, connections in our world.

ChatGPT:

Forensic science technicians, Georgia, Google searches, 'No cap', correlation, internet culture, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, relationship, professional occupations, multidisciplinary approach

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of forensic science technicians in Georgia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia

Google searches for 'no cap'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'no cap' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'no cap'

Correlation r = 0.8524745 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7267128 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'no cap') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.03E-6. 0.0000070256040225158350000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.000703% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 142,337 random variables You don't actually need 142 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia (Laborers)130360390230200220170250420470210220450480560610700590
Google searches for 'no cap' (Rel. search volume)3.083332.666672.833333.333335.757.59.4166712.083317.666722.252024.2529.916734.916749.556.416783.916767




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([130,360,390,230,200,220,170,250,420,470,210,220,450,480,560,610,700,590,])
array_2 = np.array([3.08333,2.66667,2.83333,3.33333,5.75,7.5,9.41667,12.0833,17.6667,22.25,20,24.25,29.9167,34.9167,49.5,56.4167,83.9167,67,])
array_1_name = "The number of forensic science technicians in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'no cap'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1290 · Black Variable ID: 6736 · Red Variable ID: 1368
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0