about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,654 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the second variable is Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts increases, there is a corresponding increase in the ease of transportation for the losing team in the World Series. This leads to a reduced level of travel stress and improved overall team morale, resulting in a higher performance on the field and ultimately more runs scored. After all, a smooth sailing team is a scoring team!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Realistic] Generate an image of two bridge tenders adjusting the position of the bridges next to a serene river in Massachusetts. The tenders are surrounded by lush greenery and the tranquil flow of the river. In the background, a portable radio plays a lost baseball game, with the numbers flashing on the scoreboard reflecting the score change that captures the attention of the tenders as they work. The scene should capture the atmosphere of a serene riverside setting with the tenders immersed in their task while being subtly distracted by the baseball game. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Cybernetic art Realistic Concept art Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Massachusetts, next to a serene river, two bridge tenders are seen adjusting the position of the bridges as a lost baseball game plays on a portable radio. The losing team in the World Series has just scored a run, their numbers flashing on the scoreboard, capturing the attention of the tenders as they work.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Massachusetts, next to a serene river, two bridge tenders are seen adjusting the position of the bridges as a lost baseball game plays on a portable radio. The losing team in the World Series has just scored a run, their numbers flashing on the scoreboard, capturing the attention of the tenders as they work. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Realistic] Generate an image of two bridge tenders adjusting the position of the bridges next to a serene river in Massachusetts. The tenders are surrounded by lush greenery and the tranquil flow of the river. In the background, a portable radio plays a lost baseball game, with the numbers flashing on the scoreboard reflecting the score change that captures the attention of the tenders as they work. The scene should capture the atmosphere of a serene riverside setting with the tenders immersed in their task while being subtly distracted by the baseball game.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts positively influenced Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series

Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Baseball, a sport that "locks" fans in with its suspenseful moments, dramatic plays, and the occasional extra innings that leave us all on the edge of our seats. As we delve into the numbers of this beloved American pastime, we stumble upon an unexpected bridge that connects the world of baseball to the seemingly unrelated occupation of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts. It seems there may be more to these tenders than meets the "high"way.

One might wonder, just how could the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts be tied to the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series? It's a head-scratcher, to be sure, and one that our research team couldn't resist "tendering" to explore. But really, who knew there could be a statistical connection between the swings of baseball bats and the swivels of lock mechanisms?

In the realm of statistics, it's easy to find correlations, but to uncover a significant relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities is like hitting a home run without swinging the bat. It's as unexpected as finding out that the winning baseball team has a "lock" on victory while the losing team's runs are "bridging" the gap.

This paper seeks to shed light on this offbeat correlation, providing a quantitative analysis that goes beyond simply batting averages and earned run averages. Our research aims to bring to the forefront a connection that invites further investigation and perhaps a few chuckles along the way. After all, who doesn't appreciate a good statistical analysis with a side of humor?

Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and baseball archives, we have unearthed a correlation that lifts the "lock" off this peculiar connection and offers an insight into the whimsy and unpredictability of statistical relationships. But don't worry, we promise not to "lock" you out of the details. So, buckle up and get ready to "tenderly" explore this statistical marriage between America's favorite pastime and the maintenance of its infrastructure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Baseball, a sport that "locks" fans in with its suspenseful moments, dramatic plays, and the occasional extra innings that leave us all on the edge of our seats. As we delve into the numbers of this beloved American pastime, we stumble upon an unexpected bridge that connects the world of baseball to the seemingly unrelated occupation of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts. It seems there may be more to these tenders than meets the "high"way.
One might wonder, just how could the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts be tied to the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series? It's a head-scratcher, to be sure, and one that our research team couldn't resist "tendering" to explore. But really, who knew there could be a statistical connection between the swings of baseball bats and the swivels of lock mechanisms?
In the realm of statistics, it's easy to find correlations, but to uncover a significant relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities is like hitting a home run without swinging the bat. It's as unexpected as finding out that the winning baseball team has a "lock" on victory while the losing team's runs are "bridging" the gap.
This paper seeks to shed light on this offbeat correlation, providing a quantitative analysis that goes beyond simply batting averages and earned run averages. Our research aims to bring to the forefront a connection that invites further investigation and perhaps a few chuckles along the way. After all, who doesn't appreciate a good statistical analysis with a side of humor?
Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and baseball archives, we have unearthed a correlation that lifts the "lock" off this peculiar connection and offers an insight into the whimsy and unpredictability of statistical relationships. But don't worry, we promise not to "lock" you out of the details. So, buckle up and get ready to "tenderly" explore this statistical marriage between America's favorite pastime and the maintenance of its infrastructure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The permutation of variables nuanced the peculiar link between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. In "Smith et al.," the authors found that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities yielded a coefficient of 0.8203639 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This paves the path for further scrutiny into this unexpected association.

Now, moving on to "Doe and Jones," it is interesting to note that their research delved into the historical trends of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts, and their findings echoed the uncanny alignment between the ebb and flow of tender numbers and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. The impetus for this research stemmed from the idea that perhaps there is more to these tenders than meets the eye – or perhaps, more to their tenders than meets the "I."

In exploring the relevant literature, we turned our attention to popular non-fiction works such as "The Bridges of Madison County" and "Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America" by Isenberg, both of which added a dimension of tangential relevance to our study. Meanwhile, fictional narratives like "The Lock Artist" by Hamilton and "A Bridge to the Stars" by Jonsson tantalizingly hinted at the potential interplay between the structural integrity of bridges and locks and the dynamics of the World Series.

As we ventured into less conventional sources of inspiration, cartoons and children's shows also offered insights that, while not academically rigorous, brought an element of pizzazz to our investigation. From "Bob the Builder" to "Paw Patrol," the themes of construction, teamwork, and problem-solving provided a whimsical backdrop to our earnest pursuit of uncovering the links between bridge and lock tenders and baseball outcomes.

In this light, it becomes apparent that exploring the connection between bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series not only presents a statistical enigma but also offers a lighthearted opportunity for levity in the often serious realm of statistical research. After all, who’s to say that a little statistical whimsy can't bridge the gap between seemingly incongruous fields of study?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2005 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Baseball, a sport that "locks" fans in with its suspenseful moments, dramatic plays, and the occasional extra innings that leave us all on the edge of our seats. As we delve into the numbers of this beloved American pastime, we stumble upon an unexpected bridge that connects the world of baseball to the seemingly unrelated occupation of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts. It seems there may be more to these tenders than meets the "high"way.
One might wonder, just how could the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts be tied to the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series? It's a head-scratcher, to be sure, and one that our research team couldn't resist "tendering" to explore. But really, who knew there could be a statistical connection between the swings of baseball bats and the swivels of lock mechanisms?
In the realm of statistics, it's easy to find correlations, but to uncover a significant relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities is like hitting a home run without swinging the bat. It's as unexpected as finding out that the winning baseball team has a "lock" on victory while the losing team's runs are "bridging" the gap.
This paper seeks to shed light on this offbeat correlation, providing a quantitative analysis that goes beyond simply batting averages and earned run averages. Our research aims to bring to the forefront a connection that invites further investigation and perhaps a few chuckles along the way. After all, who doesn't appreciate a good statistical analysis with a side of humor?
Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and baseball archives, we have unearthed a correlation that lifts the "lock" off this peculiar connection and offers an insight into the whimsy and unpredictability of statistical relationships. But don't worry, we promise not to "lock" you out of the details. So, buckle up and get ready to "tenderly" explore this statistical marriage between America's favorite pastime and the maintenance of its infrastructure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, our research team embarked on a statistically whimsical journey. We harnessed the power of data collection from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, utilizing a concoction of structured interviews, engaging surveys, and a sprinkle of web scraping to gather the necessary information. It was a bit like crafting the perfect baseball roster – a strategic blend of methods for optimal performance.

Once the data was gathered, we engaged in a meticulous process of data cleaning, thoroughly sieving through the information like a baseball fan hunting for the best seat in the stadium. We rigorously checked for outliers and inaccuracies, ensuring that our data set was as pristine as a freshly mown outfield. After all, we couldn't afford any errors - we needed to make sure our results were a "hit" with the statistical community!

Next, we employed a harmonious blend of statistical techniques, including correlation analysis, regression modeling, and a pinch of Bayesian inference to tease out the relationship between the number of bridge and lock tenders and runs scored by the losing team. We also utilized a sophisticated algorithm, affectionately named the "Highway Bridge Lock Model," to create a robust framework for our analysis. It's safe to say that we didn't just build bridges; we built statistical bridges of understanding.

To ensure the reliability and validity of our results, we subjected our analysis to a battery of sensitivity tests and diagnostics, akin to the meticulous scrutiny of an umpire reviewing a contested play. We even took a leaf out of the baseball playbook and implemented a strategic time-series analysis to capture any temporal nuances in the data. We didn't want to miss any curveballs, after all.

Lastly, to assess the significance of our findings, we calculated p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes with the precision of a baseball pitcher targeting the strike zone. We opted for a threshold of p < 0.01 to determine the statistical significance, ensuring that our results were as reliable as a veteran pitcher getting ready to throw the game-winning pitch.

In the end, our methodology was a fusion of rigorous statistical techniques and a touch of lightheartedness, underscoring the essence of playful inquiry and rigorous analysis that defines the joy of academic research. After all, as Mark Twain once said, "The secret of getting ahead is getting started," and we certainly did so with a resounding "strike" of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2005 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.8203639, r-squared of 0.6729969, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Baseball, a sport that "locks" fans in with its suspenseful moments, dramatic plays, and the occasional extra innings that leave us all on the edge of our seats. As we delve into the numbers of this beloved American pastime, we stumble upon an unexpected bridge that connects the world of baseball to the seemingly unrelated occupation of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts. It seems there may be more to these tenders than meets the "high"way.
One might wonder, just how could the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts be tied to the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series? It's a head-scratcher, to be sure, and one that our research team couldn't resist "tendering" to explore. But really, who knew there could be a statistical connection between the swings of baseball bats and the swivels of lock mechanisms?
In the realm of statistics, it's easy to find correlations, but to uncover a significant relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities is like hitting a home run without swinging the bat. It's as unexpected as finding out that the winning baseball team has a "lock" on victory while the losing team's runs are "bridging" the gap.
This paper seeks to shed light on this offbeat correlation, providing a quantitative analysis that goes beyond simply batting averages and earned run averages. Our research aims to bring to the forefront a connection that invites further investigation and perhaps a few chuckles along the way. After all, who doesn't appreciate a good statistical analysis with a side of humor?
Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and baseball archives, we have unearthed a correlation that lifts the "lock" off this peculiar connection and offers an insight into the whimsy and unpredictability of statistical relationships. But don't worry, we promise not to "lock" you out of the details. So, buckle up and get ready to "tenderly" explore this statistical marriage between America's favorite pastime and the maintenance of its infrastructure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series revealed a surprising relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639, a coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6729969, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings provide compelling evidence of a strong positive connection between these two unrelated entities, leaving us to wonder if we've stumbled upon the "bridge of destiny" or simply uncovered a "lock" of coincidence.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the remarkable correlation between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. It's as clear as day that there's more to this statistical relationship than meets the eye.

It appears that when it comes to baseball outcomes, the work of bridge and lock tenders may exert a surprisingly influential role, much like the relief pitcher coming out of the bullpen to "lock down" a game. One might even say that these tenders hold the "key" to understanding the subtle nuances of the game. Is it possible that the creaking of bridge mechanisms echoes the arduous efforts of a losing team attempting to "bridge" the gap in runs scored? Only time (and further research) will tell.

Our findings not only serve to emphasize the unexpected connections that statistical analysis can unveil but also provide a whimsical reminder that even in the world of academia, a good "dad joke" never goes amiss. After all, who could resist the puns and wordplay of this unlikely statistical relationship?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The permutation of variables nuanced the peculiar link between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. In "Smith et al.," the authors found that the correlation between these seemingly unrelated entities yielded a coefficient of 0.8203639 with a significance level of p < 0.01. This paves the path for further scrutiny into this unexpected association.
Now, moving on to "Doe and Jones," it is interesting to note that their research delved into the historical trends of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts, and their findings echoed the uncanny alignment between the ebb and flow of tender numbers and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. The impetus for this research stemmed from the idea that perhaps there is more to these tenders than meets the eye – or perhaps, more to their tenders than meets the "I."
In exploring the relevant literature, we turned our attention to popular non-fiction works such as "The Bridges of Madison County" and "Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America" by Isenberg, both of which added a dimension of tangential relevance to our study. Meanwhile, fictional narratives like "The Lock Artist" by Hamilton and "A Bridge to the Stars" by Jonsson tantalizingly hinted at the potential interplay between the structural integrity of bridges and locks and the dynamics of the World Series.
As we ventured into less conventional sources of inspiration, cartoons and children's shows also offered insights that, while not academically rigorous, brought an element of pizzazz to our investigation. From "Bob the Builder" to "Paw Patrol," the themes of construction, teamwork, and problem-solving provided a whimsical backdrop to our earnest pursuit of uncovering the links between bridge and lock tenders and baseball outcomes.
In this light, it becomes apparent that exploring the connection between bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series not only presents a statistical enigma but also offers a lighthearted opportunity for levity in the often serious realm of statistical research. After all, who’s to say that a little statistical whimsy can't bridge the gap between seemingly incongruous fields of study?

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series revealed a surprising relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639, a coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6729969, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings provide compelling evidence of a strong positive connection between these two unrelated entities, leaving us to wonder if we've stumbled upon the "bridge of destiny" or simply uncovered a "lock" of coincidence.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the remarkable correlation between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. It's as clear as day that there's more to this statistical relationship than meets the eye.
It appears that when it comes to baseball outcomes, the work of bridge and lock tenders may exert a surprisingly influential role, much like the relief pitcher coming out of the bullpen to "lock down" a game. One might even say that these tenders hold the "key" to understanding the subtle nuances of the game. Is it possible that the creaking of bridge mechanisms echoes the arduous efforts of a losing team attempting to "bridge" the gap in runs scored? Only time (and further research) will tell.
Our findings not only serve to emphasize the unexpected connections that statistical analysis can unveil but also provide a whimsical reminder that even in the world of academia, a good "dad joke" never goes amiss. After all, who could resist the puns and wordplay of this unlikely statistical relationship?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have uncovered a fascinating correlation between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. The strong positive connection with a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and a p-value of less than 0.01 not only supports the prior research by Smith et al., affirming the unexpected association between these seemingly disparate entities, but also piques further curiosity. It seems we've finally built the "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, bringing new meaning to the term "bridge-builder."

Moreover, the empirical evidence we have gleaned suggests an intriguing interplay between the functions of bridge and lock tenders and the dynamics of baseball outcomes. It's almost as if the tenders are metaphorically "locking" hands with the losing team, playing an unexpected role in the ebb and flow of runs scored. This leaves one pondering whether these tenders are indeed the "key" players in the game, shaping the narrative much like a key is used to lock a door.

In line with the findings of Doe and Jones, our study reinforces the significance of considering historical trends in bridge and lock tender numbers, highlighting an uncanny alignment with the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. This "tender" subject of inquiry has evolved from mere statistical observation to a potentially profound aspect of baseball outcomes, prompting the need for further exploration into the mechanisms behind this connection.

Our whimsical approach to uncovering unconventional links between bridge and lock tenders and baseball outcomes has not only yielded remarkable statistical insights but has also added a touch of humor to the often serious pursuit of academic research. Indeed, it appears that statistical whimsy can, in fact, "bridge" the gap between seemingly incongruous fields of study, challenging traditional perceptions of statistical investigation. And as we've learned from this research, sometimes the most unexpected connections can be found in the unlikeliest of places – much like discovering a "lock" in a "tender" subject.

In conclusion, this study's unexpected findings open up a realm of possibilities for future research and may serve as a playful reminder that statistical analysis can be as unpredictable and delightful as a well-timed dad joke. After all, who wouldn't want to "tender" a little statistical humor now and then?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.

Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Baseball, a sport that "locks" fans in with its suspenseful moments, dramatic plays, and the occasional extra innings that leave us all on the edge of our seats. As we delve into the numbers of this beloved American pastime, we stumble upon an unexpected bridge that connects the world of baseball to the seemingly unrelated occupation of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts. It seems there may be more to these tenders than meets the "high"way.
One might wonder, just how could the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts be tied to the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series? It's a head-scratcher, to be sure, and one that our research team couldn't resist "tendering" to explore. But really, who knew there could be a statistical connection between the swings of baseball bats and the swivels of lock mechanisms?
In the realm of statistics, it's easy to find correlations, but to uncover a significant relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities is like hitting a home run without swinging the bat. It's as unexpected as finding out that the winning baseball team has a "lock" on victory while the losing team's runs are "bridging" the gap.
This paper seeks to shed light on this offbeat correlation, providing a quantitative analysis that goes beyond simply batting averages and earned run averages. Our research aims to bring to the forefront a connection that invites further investigation and perhaps a few chuckles along the way. After all, who doesn't appreciate a good statistical analysis with a side of humor?
Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and baseball archives, we have unearthed a correlation that lifts the "lock" off this peculiar connection and offers an insight into the whimsy and unpredictability of statistical relationships. But don't worry, we promise not to "lock" you out of the details. So, buckle up and get ready to "tenderly" explore this statistical marriage between America's favorite pastime and the maintenance of its infrastructure.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series revealed a surprising relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639, a coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6729969, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings provide compelling evidence of a strong positive connection between these two unrelated entities, leaving us to wonder if we've stumbled upon the "bridge of destiny" or simply uncovered a "lock" of coincidence.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the remarkable correlation between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. It's as clear as day that there's more to this statistical relationship than meets the eye.
It appears that when it comes to baseball outcomes, the work of bridge and lock tenders may exert a surprisingly influential role, much like the relief pitcher coming out of the bullpen to "lock down" a game. One might even say that these tenders hold the "key" to understanding the subtle nuances of the game. Is it possible that the creaking of bridge mechanisms echoes the arduous efforts of a losing team attempting to "bridge" the gap in runs scored? Only time (and further research) will tell.
Our findings not only serve to emphasize the unexpected connections that statistical analysis can unveil but also provide a whimsical reminder that even in the world of academia, a good "dad joke" never goes amiss. After all, who could resist the puns and wordplay of this unlikely statistical relationship?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light an unexpectedly strong correlation between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and the runs scored by the losing team in the World Series. It seems that when it comes to baseball outcomes, the work of bridge and lock tenders may hold more significance than we initially thought, much like a curveball that catches us off guard.

The statistical link we've uncovered not only adds a new dimension to the intricate web of factors influencing baseball results but also serves as a reminder that in the world of data analysis, there's always room for a "bridge" to unexpected discoveries. It's as if the tenders have been silently influencing the fate of losing teams, just like a coach guiding their players from behind the scenes.

With our findings, we can't help but ponder: Are these tenders quietly "locking in" the fate of the losing team, or could they be the "bridge" to understanding the unanticipated nuances of baseball outcomes? It's a conundrum as perplexing as trying to figure out why the baseball kept disappearing, until it finally hit me.

Moreover, our research highlights the value of exploring unlikely statistical connections, proving that when it comes to uncovering remarkable relationships, it's all about "tending" to the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some. It's as if we've hit a statistical home run without even swinging the bat!

In light of these findings, we assert that further investigation into this area is unnecessary. As they say in baseball, it's best to "tender" to other statistical mysteries and leave this particular "lock" and "bridge" combination to bask in its statistical glory. After all, sometimes it's best to let a good correlation stand on its own, just like a well-timed dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Studies of Quirky Correlations (SISQC)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bridge the Gap: An Unlikely Correlation between Bridge and Lock Tenders in Massachusetts and Runs Scored by the Losing Team in the World Series with an abstract of Baseball, a beloved pastime filled with statistics, surprises, and the occasional heartbreak. This paper delves into the curious connection between the number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts and runs scored by the losing team in the World Series, shedding light on an unexpected correlation. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8203639 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2013, providing empirical evidence to support this intriguing link.
Interestingly, our findings prompt the question: Is there a "bridge" between the work of these tenders and the gap in runs scored by the losing team, or is it merely a "lock" of coincidence? Our results not only invite further investigation into the factors influencing baseball outcomes but also serve as a reminder to "bridge" the gap between seemingly disparate fields of study. After all, when it comes to uncovering remarkable connections, it's all about "locking" in on the unexpected, even if it's a "tender" subject for some.

ChatGPT:

bridge tenders, lock tenders, Massachusetts, runs scored, losing team, World Series, correlation coefficient, baseball statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, factors influencing baseball outcomes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts

Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series

Correlation r = 0.8203639 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6729969 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts) over the 9 years from 2005 through 2013.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0068. 0.0067534680212687020000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.68% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 148 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.34, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013
The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts (Bridge And Lock Tenders)6070801101701301705040
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series (Runs scored)14111015271230614




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60,70,80,110,170,130,170,50,40,])
array_2 = np.array([14,11,10,15,27,12,30,6,14,])
array_1_name = "The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 1654 · Black Variable ID: 17591 · Red Variable ID: 535
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0