about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,984 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Robberies in Mississippi and the second variable is The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As robberies decreased, there was less demand for hastily paved secret getaway roads, leading to a surplus of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Apparently, even the paving industry couldn't escape the impact of a crime-free Mississippi!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a small town in Mississippi. Show a group of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators focused on resurfacing a road. In the background, include a convenience store being robbed, drawing the attention of law enforcement and interrupting the peaceful work scene. The contrast of the serene roadwork and the chaotic robbery should be visually engaging. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art A Discovery magazine cover image A photo-realistic image Cyber folk Celtic art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Mississippi, a group of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators are carefully working on resurfacing a road. Suddenly, a robbery takes place at a nearby convenience store, drawing the attention of law enforcement and interrupting the peaceful work scene.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Mississippi, a group of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators are carefully working on resurfacing a road. Suddenly, a robbery takes place at a nearby convenience store, drawing the attention of law enforcement and interrupting the peaceful work scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a small town in Mississippi. Show a group of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators focused on resurfacing a road. In the background, include a convenience store being robbed, drawing the attention of law enforcement and interrupting the peaceful work scene. The contrast of the serene roadwork and the chaotic robbery should be visually engaging.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Robberies in Mississippi caused The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

The Journal of Applied Pavementology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Welcome to this pavement-pounding study where we explore the curious connection between the number of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. As researchers, we're used to digging deep into data, but we never expected to find such a concrete correlation between these two variables.

The idea for this study sprouted from a lightbulb moment – we pondered, "Could there be more to Mississippi's crime and construction statistics than meets the eye?" Little did we know, we'd be uncovering a pavement puzzle worthy of a Nobel Prize in Ridiculous Research Discoveries.

Now, before you roll your eyes at the thought of comparing pavement with pilferage, let's consider the possibility that there might be more to this correlation than meets the road, er, eye. After all, as asphalt clad pioneers of research, we're no strangers to unearthing unexpected relationships in the data. So, buckle up and hit the road with us as we embark on a hilariously unexpected journey to probe the interplay of theft and tarmac.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this pavement-pounding study where we explore the curious connection between the number of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. As researchers, we're used to digging deep into data, but we never expected to find such a concrete correlation between these two variables.
The idea for this study sprouted from a lightbulb moment – we pondered, "Could there be more to Mississippi's crime and construction statistics than meets the eye?" Little did we know, we'd be uncovering a pavement puzzle worthy of a Nobel Prize in Ridiculous Research Discoveries.
Now, before you roll your eyes at the thought of comparing pavement with pilferage, let's consider the possibility that there might be more to this correlation than meets the road, er, eye. After all, as asphalt clad pioneers of research, we're no strangers to unearthing unexpected relationships in the data. So, buckle up and hit the road with us as we embark on a hilariously unexpected journey to probe the interplay of theft and tarmac.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To situate our study within the broader academic discourse, we begin by examining existing literature concerning crime rates and occupational trends. Smith (2015) highlights the correlation between economic downturns and an increase in property crimes, such as theft and burglary. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) emphasizes the impact of urbanization on crime rates, pointing to the prevalence of robberies in densely populated areas. These studies provide valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of criminal activities, setting the stage for our investigation into the peculiar connection between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators.

Shifting our focus to the realm of labor statistics, Jones (2016) delves into the occupational dynamics of the construction industry, elucidating the key role played by paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in infrastructure development. Furthermore, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' comprehensive reports offer a wealth of data regarding employment trends, wage projections, and occupational hazards within the construction sector. These scholarly works serve as the foundational bedrock upon which we built our analysis, bringing us one step closer to unraveling the enigmatic relationship between criminal incidents and the presence of pavement professionals.

In a slightly more unconventional turn, "Pavement Perplexities: An Exploration of Asphalt Anomalies" (Smith, 2019) sheds light on the lesser-known anecdotes and conundrums surrounding the world of paving, presenting a quirky yet insightful perspective into the peculiarities of pavement maintenance. This offbeat yet informative literature expands our understanding of the idiosyncratic realm of construction work, providing a quirky lens through which we can view the intersection of crime and tarmac-related occupations.

Venturing further into the domain of fictional literature, works such as "The Asphalt Avenger" and "The Paving Predicament" offer imaginative depictions of crime-fighting protagonists within the context of road construction, prompting us to ponder the potential influence of popular culture on societal perceptions of paving and criminal activities. Additionally, TV shows like "Pave Wars" and "Paving Justice" exhibit dramatized interpretations of conflicts and resolutions within the construction industry, offering a light-hearted yet revealing glimpse into the public's fascination with paving-related narratives.

As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes apparent that the intersection of crime and pavement-related occupations is not as straightforward as the straightest stretch of highway. By incorporating diverse sources, both scholarly and fictional, we aim to elucidate the unexpected nuances underlying our research interest and pave the way for a more engaging exploration of this intriguing correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this pavement-pounding study where we explore the curious connection between the number of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. As researchers, we're used to digging deep into data, but we never expected to find such a concrete correlation between these two variables.
The idea for this study sprouted from a lightbulb moment – we pondered, "Could there be more to Mississippi's crime and construction statistics than meets the eye?" Little did we know, we'd be uncovering a pavement puzzle worthy of a Nobel Prize in Ridiculous Research Discoveries.
Now, before you roll your eyes at the thought of comparing pavement with pilferage, let's consider the possibility that there might be more to this correlation than meets the road, er, eye. After all, as asphalt clad pioneers of research, we're no strangers to unearthing unexpected relationships in the data. So, buckle up and hit the road with us as we embark on a hilariously unexpected journey to probe the interplay of theft and tarmac.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Now that we've set the stage for our journey into the wild world of correlations between crime and construction, let's take a peek under the hood of our data collection and analysis methods. Our approach to uncovering the puzzling relationship between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators was anything but pedestrian. We traversed the bumpy terrain of statistical analysis, waving our "caution: data at work" flag with pride.

Data Collection:

To kick off this pavement-pounding research, we harnessed the power of the information superhighway, also known as the internet, to source our data. We turned to reliable repositories of crime statistics, making a pit stop at the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to gather detailed records of reported robberies in the state of Mississippi from 2003 to 2022. Meanwhile, our quest for occupational data led us to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, where we uncovered the numbers of hardworking paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators who weathered the employment landscape during the same time period. The virtual highways and byways of data mining led us to these goldmines of information, allowing us to lay the groundwork for our analysis.

Data Analysis:

With our treasure trove of data in tow, we revved up our statistical engines and embarked on the formidable task of crunching numbers. Our toolbox was filled to the brim with an assortment of statistical methods, from simple correlation coefficients to more complex regression analyses. We carefully paved our path through the data, scrutinizing every twist and turn to tease out any potential relationships between robberies and the employment of pavement professionals.

To quantify the strength of the relationship, we computed a correlation coefficient to measure the degree to which the two variables, robberies, and paving-related employment, moved in tandem. But that's not all—the pièce de résistance of our analysis was the p-value, a statistical superhero that swooped in to determine whether the relationship we observed was just a fluke or a true-blue signal.

So, picture us donning our statistical hard hats and wielding our analysis tools with the finesse of a maestro conducting a symphony, as we unraveled the digitized mysteries hidden within the data.

Stay tuned for our next installment, where we showcase the results of our quirkily captivating exploration into the potential correlation between crime and construction. Buckle up, fellow pavement ponders, for the ride is about to get statistically spectacular!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9230430, r-squared of 0.8520083, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this pavement-pounding study where we explore the curious connection between the number of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. As researchers, we're used to digging deep into data, but we never expected to find such a concrete correlation between these two variables.
The idea for this study sprouted from a lightbulb moment – we pondered, "Could there be more to Mississippi's crime and construction statistics than meets the eye?" Little did we know, we'd be uncovering a pavement puzzle worthy of a Nobel Prize in Ridiculous Research Discoveries.
Now, before you roll your eyes at the thought of comparing pavement with pilferage, let's consider the possibility that there might be more to this correlation than meets the road, er, eye. After all, as asphalt clad pioneers of research, we're no strangers to unearthing unexpected relationships in the data. So, buckle up and hit the road with us as we embark on a hilariously unexpected journey to probe the interplay of theft and tarmac.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data collected from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we uncovered a startling connection between the occurrences of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. The correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding suggests that as the number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators increased, the incidences of robberies in Mississippi decreased, or perhaps the criminals just couldn't handle the heat of the pavement!

The r-squared value of 0.8520083 further highlighted the robustness of this relationship, demonstrating that a whopping 85.20% of the variation in the occurrence of robberies can be explained by the variation in the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It seems that the road to fewer robberies in Mississippi is, quite literally, paved with asphalt!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between these variables. Instead, our findings suggest that there is indeed a significant statistical link between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It appears that these two disparate domains are not as unrelated as one might assume at first glance.

To visually convey the strength of this connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably exhibits the strong positive correlation between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. The data points cling to the regression line like freshly laid asphalt, leaving little room for doubt about the robustness of this relationship.

In summary, our results not only unveil an unexpected correlation between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators but also highlight the quirky yet captivating connections that can be revealed through rigorous statistical analysis. It's clear that when it comes to crime and construction, the devil is in the details – or should we say, the data!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To situate our study within the broader academic discourse, we begin by examining existing literature concerning crime rates and occupational trends. Smith (2015) highlights the correlation between economic downturns and an increase in property crimes, such as theft and burglary. Meanwhile, Doe (2018) emphasizes the impact of urbanization on crime rates, pointing to the prevalence of robberies in densely populated areas. These studies provide valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of criminal activities, setting the stage for our investigation into the peculiar connection between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators.
Shifting our focus to the realm of labor statistics, Jones (2016) delves into the occupational dynamics of the construction industry, elucidating the key role played by paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in infrastructure development. Furthermore, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' comprehensive reports offer a wealth of data regarding employment trends, wage projections, and occupational hazards within the construction sector. These scholarly works serve as the foundational bedrock upon which we built our analysis, bringing us one step closer to unraveling the enigmatic relationship between criminal incidents and the presence of pavement professionals.
In a slightly more unconventional turn, "Pavement Perplexities: An Exploration of Asphalt Anomalies" (Smith, 2019) sheds light on the lesser-known anecdotes and conundrums surrounding the world of paving, presenting a quirky yet insightful perspective into the peculiarities of pavement maintenance. This offbeat yet informative literature expands our understanding of the idiosyncratic realm of construction work, providing a quirky lens through which we can view the intersection of crime and tarmac-related occupations.
Venturing further into the domain of fictional literature, works such as "The Asphalt Avenger" and "The Paving Predicament" offer imaginative depictions of crime-fighting protagonists within the context of road construction, prompting us to ponder the potential influence of popular culture on societal perceptions of paving and criminal activities. Additionally, TV shows like "Pave Wars" and "Paving Justice" exhibit dramatized interpretations of conflicts and resolutions within the construction industry, offering a light-hearted yet revealing glimpse into the public's fascination with paving-related narratives.
As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes apparent that the intersection of crime and pavement-related occupations is not as straightforward as the straightest stretch of highway. By incorporating diverse sources, both scholarly and fictional, we aim to elucidate the unexpected nuances underlying our research interest and pave the way for a more engaging exploration of this intriguing correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we uncovered a startling connection between the occurrences of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. The correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding suggests that as the number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators increased, the incidences of robberies in Mississippi decreased, or perhaps the criminals just couldn't handle the heat of the pavement!
The r-squared value of 0.8520083 further highlighted the robustness of this relationship, demonstrating that a whopping 85.20% of the variation in the occurrence of robberies can be explained by the variation in the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It seems that the road to fewer robberies in Mississippi is, quite literally, paved with asphalt!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between these variables. Instead, our findings suggest that there is indeed a significant statistical link between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It appears that these two disparate domains are not as unrelated as one might assume at first glance.
To visually convey the strength of this connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably exhibits the strong positive correlation between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. The data points cling to the regression line like freshly laid asphalt, leaving little room for doubt about the robustness of this relationship.
In summary, our results not only unveil an unexpected correlation between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators but also highlight the quirky yet captivating connections that can be revealed through rigorous statistical analysis. It's clear that when it comes to crime and construction, the devil is in the details – or should we say, the data!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have paved the way for a fascinating discussion, shedding light on the seemingly improbable link between criminal activities and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. As we delve into the implications of our results, it's clear that there's more to this correlation than meets the eye – or should we say, more than meets the asphalt!

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 that we unearthed not only supports prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2018) on the multifaceted nature of criminal activities but also adds a novel dimension to the existing literature. It appears that as urbanization and economic downturns influence crime rates, the presence of paving professionals may play a surprising role in deterring robberies. Perhaps the potential suspects simply couldn't handle the pressure of evading the law while trying to navigate the complexities of pavement-related pursuits. After all, asphalt is no easy road to tread!

Moreover, our results align with Jones's (2016) insights into the occupational dynamics of the construction industry, emphasizing the pivotal position of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in infrastructure development. Let's not underestimate the impact of these professionals – it seems they've been silently but effectively "paving the way" to a safer Mississippi!

Our quirky yet insightful literature review draws attention to the whimsical anecdotes and conundrums surrounding pavement maintenance presented by Smith (2019). Little did we know that amidst the asphalt anomalies lies a peculiar association with criminal incidents. Furthermore, incorporating diverse sources, from scholarly to fictional, allowed us to uncover the unexpected nuances underlying our research interest. It goes to show that when it comes to crime and construction, the story is never just set in stone – it's constantly evolving like a freshly laid road!

In a light-hearted yet revealing nod to popular culture, our findings resonate with the imaginative depictions of crime-fighting protagonists within the context of construction and the public's fascination with paving-related narratives. Could it be that the fictional asphalt avengers were onto something after all? It's a thought as tantalizing as a freshly paved surface!

Ultimately, our study has broken new ground in the understanding of the interplay between criminal activities and occupational patterns. It's evident that the road to uncovering unique correlations might twist and turn more unexpectedly than an unpaved country lane. With this in mind, we must approach our scholarly pursuits with an open mind, ready to embrace the unanticipated connections that may lie beneath the surface of even the most mundane variables. After all, in the world of research, there's always more than meets the eye – and sometimes, it's a pavement-flavored surprise!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Robberies in Mississippi and The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Welcome to this pavement-pounding study where we explore the curious connection between the number of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. As researchers, we're used to digging deep into data, but we never expected to find such a concrete correlation between these two variables.
The idea for this study sprouted from a lightbulb moment – we pondered, "Could there be more to Mississippi's crime and construction statistics than meets the eye?" Little did we know, we'd be uncovering a pavement puzzle worthy of a Nobel Prize in Ridiculous Research Discoveries.
Now, before you roll your eyes at the thought of comparing pavement with pilferage, let's consider the possibility that there might be more to this correlation than meets the road, er, eye. After all, as asphalt clad pioneers of research, we're no strangers to unearthing unexpected relationships in the data. So, buckle up and hit the road with us as we embark on a hilariously unexpected journey to probe the interplay of theft and tarmac.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we uncovered a startling connection between the occurrences of robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. The correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding suggests that as the number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators increased, the incidences of robberies in Mississippi decreased, or perhaps the criminals just couldn't handle the heat of the pavement!
The r-squared value of 0.8520083 further highlighted the robustness of this relationship, demonstrating that a whopping 85.20% of the variation in the occurrence of robberies can be explained by the variation in the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It seems that the road to fewer robberies in Mississippi is, quite literally, paved with asphalt!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between these variables. Instead, our findings suggest that there is indeed a significant statistical link between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. It appears that these two disparate domains are not as unrelated as one might assume at first glance.
To visually convey the strength of this connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that unmistakably exhibits the strong positive correlation between the number of robberies and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi. The data points cling to the regression line like freshly laid asphalt, leaving little room for doubt about the robustness of this relationship.
In summary, our results not only unveil an unexpected correlation between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators but also highlight the quirky yet captivating connections that can be revealed through rigorous statistical analysis. It's clear that when it comes to crime and construction, the devil is in the details – or should we say, the data!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have paved the way for a paradigm shift in understanding the quirky correlations that exist within the realm of crime and construction. The striking statistical link between robberies in Mississippi and the employment of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators suggests that when it comes to criminal activity, the road less traveled may indeed be the freshly paved one.

These results not only highlight the necessity of considering unexpected variables in crime analysis but also serve as a reminder that in the world of statistics, one must always be prepared for some unexpected twists and turns. Who would have thought that the path to reducing robberies would involve laying asphalt?

In light of these findings, we make a strong case for incorporating unconventional factors into crime prevention strategies. Perhaps a "Pave the Way to Safety" initiative could prove to be the missing piece in Mississippi's crime reduction efforts. After all, why rely on traditional crime-fighting methods when you can literally lay the groundwork for a safer community?

As for future research, we assert that no further investigation is needed in this area. After all, we have already surfaced the underlying connection between criminal behavior and pavement-related occupations – and that's certainly no small feat. It's time to roll up our sleeves and tackle the next peculiar puzzle in the world of statistical correlations. Remember, when it comes to research, sometimes the most unexpected variables lead to the most intriguing discoveries!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Applied Pavementology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

National Association for Road Infrastructure Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Paving the Way to Safety: A Correlative Analysis of Robberies in Mississippi and the Employment of Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Operators with an abstract of This paper explores the relationship between the occurrence of robberies in the state of Mississippi and the number of individuals employed as paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators. Using data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, we conducted a thorough analysis to uncover any potential correlations. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9230430 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical link between these seemingly unrelated variables. While causation cannot be definitively established, it appears that when the pavement is involved, theft takes a backseat. This study sheds light on the quirky yet intriguing connections that may exist in the realm of criminal activity and occupational patterns.

ChatGPT:

robberies, Mississippi, employment, paving operators, surfacing operators, tamping equipment, correlation analysis, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical link, criminal activity, occupational patterns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Robberies in Mississippi
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in Mississippi
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in Mississippi

The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi

Correlation r = 0.9230430 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8520083 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Robberies in Mississippi) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-9. 0.0000000067840256131500166000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 6.8E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 147,405,104 random variables You don't actually need 147 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Robberies in Mississippi (Robbery rate)104.686.382.711299.2104.8100.693.583.876.280.680.377.381.583.45754.447.827.825.6
The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi (Laborers)1240114011201100114012201110910870970920900790910880790730680330470




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([104.6,86.3,82.7,112,99.2,104.8,100.6,93.5,83.8,76.2,80.6,80.3,77.3,81.5,83.4,57,54.4,47.8,27.8,25.6,])
array_2 = np.array([1240,1140,1120,1100,1140,1220,1110,910,870,970,920,900,790,910,880,790,730,680,330,470,])
array_1_name = "Robberies in Mississippi"
array_2_name = "The number of paving, surfacing, and tamping equipment operators in Mississippi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1984 · Black Variable ID: 20198 · Red Variable ID: 10304
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0