about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,049 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and the second variable is Kerosene used in Tanzania.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the genetically modified cotton in North Carolina dwindled, so did the need for intense agricultural machinery. With the reduction in cottony chaos, there was a decreased demand for kerosene to fuel the previously buzzing, now snoozing, farm equipment. This curious case of transcontinental tranquility had Tanzanian kerosene wondering, "Where have all the cotton fields gone?" An unexpected twist in the fabric of agricultural interdependence, or should we say, inter-cotton-nence!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ inspired by bauhaus ] In a minimalist, geometric style, create an image of a vast North Carolina cotton field. In the foreground, depict a farmer closely inspecting rows of genetically modified cotton plants. The vibrant colors and rigid lines should capture the precision and order of the scene. In the background, portray a simple silhouette of a Tanzanian family's rural home illuminated by kerosene lamps as the sun sets, emphasizing the contrast between agricultural advancements and traditional living. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Psychedelic Cyber folk inspired by bauhaus Cubism
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in North Carolina, a farmer is inspecting rows of tall cotton plants, some of which have been genetically modified to resist pests. In the distance, in Tanzania, a family is using kerosene lamps to light their home as the sun sets.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a field in North Carolina, a farmer is inspecting rows of tall cotton plants, some of which have been genetically modified to resist pests. In the distance, in Tanzania, a family is using kerosene lamps to light their home as the sun sets. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ inspired by bauhaus ] In a minimalist, geometric style, create an image of a vast North Carolina cotton field. In the foreground, depict a farmer closely inspecting rows of genetically modified cotton plants. The vibrant colors and rigid lines should capture the precision and order of the scene. In the background, portray a simple silhouette of a Tanzanian family's rural home illuminated by kerosene lamps as the sun sets, emphasizing the contrast between agricultural advancements and traditional living.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in North Carolina caused Kerosene used in Tanzania to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania

The Journal of Agro-Comedic Studies

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Cotton, the fabric of our lives, and kerosene, the fuel that ignites the flames of life in many Tanzanian households, may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a snowflake. However, as we delve into the multifaceted web of agricultural and energy systems, a curious pattern emerges, akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack. We are presented with a conundrum that tickles the intellect and challenges conventional thinking – the seemingly whimsical connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.

GMOs have long been a subject of heated debates and controversies, much like the searing heat of the sun that North Carolina cotton fields endure. Meanwhile, kerosene, with its warm glow and pungent aroma, holds a significant position in the lives of many Tanzanians, akin to a trusted companion on a moonlit night. Our quest to understand the link between these two disparate elements has led us down a meandering path filled with surprises and unexpected delights, reminiscent of a playful journey through a perplexing maze.

The potential intersection of GMO use in cotton cultivation in the United States and kerosene consumption in Tanzania may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, much like a group of intrigued onlookers witnessing a particularly enthralling circus performance. As we navigate through this academic circus, we are reminded of the charm and awe of uncovering unforeseen connections, akin to the enchanting discovery of a hidden treasure amid a pile of mundane debris.

In this paper, we present the results of our rigorous analysis that unearths the fascinating correlation between these seemingly disparate elements. As we unravel the intricate dance of data and statistics, we invite readers to join us in this earnest pursuit of knowledge, and perhaps, to partake in a wry chuckle at the unexpected twist of fate that has brought together the world of cotton and the realm of kerosene in a harmonious and perplexing coexistence.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this peculiar yet captivating academic journey, for as we shall soon reveal, the world of research is indeed a stage where the most unlikely actors take their bows in the grand theater of the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cotton, the fabric of our lives, and kerosene, the fuel that ignites the flames of life in many Tanzanian households, may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a snowflake. However, as we delve into the multifaceted web of agricultural and energy systems, a curious pattern emerges, akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack. We are presented with a conundrum that tickles the intellect and challenges conventional thinking – the seemingly whimsical connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.
GMOs have long been a subject of heated debates and controversies, much like the searing heat of the sun that North Carolina cotton fields endure. Meanwhile, kerosene, with its warm glow and pungent aroma, holds a significant position in the lives of many Tanzanians, akin to a trusted companion on a moonlit night. Our quest to understand the link between these two disparate elements has led us down a meandering path filled with surprises and unexpected delights, reminiscent of a playful journey through a perplexing maze.
The potential intersection of GMO use in cotton cultivation in the United States and kerosene consumption in Tanzania may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, much like a group of intrigued onlookers witnessing a particularly enthralling circus performance. As we navigate through this academic circus, we are reminded of the charm and awe of uncovering unforeseen connections, akin to the enchanting discovery of a hidden treasure amid a pile of mundane debris.
In this paper, we present the results of our rigorous analysis that unearths the fascinating correlation between these seemingly disparate elements. As we unravel the intricate dance of data and statistics, we invite readers to join us in this earnest pursuit of knowledge, and perhaps, to partake in a wry chuckle at the unexpected twist of fate that has brought together the world of cotton and the realm of kerosene in a harmonious and perplexing coexistence.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this peculiar yet captivating academic journey, for as we shall soon reveal, the world of research is indeed a stage where the most unlikely actors take their bows in the grand theater of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The cornerstone of our exploration is in "The Cotton Connection: How GMOs Revolutionized Cotton Cultivation," by Smith et al. The authors find that the introduction of genetically modified varieties of cotton has significantly impacted the landscape of cotton production, akin to a plucky innovation upsetting the delicate balance of a juggling act. The use of GMOs has led to improved resistance to pests and enhanced yields, transforming the cotton fields of North Carolina into a veritable circus of productivity.

Adding to this insight, a study by Doe et al., "Kerosene and Energy Dynamics in Tanzania," delves into the intricate ecosystem of kerosene consumption and energy patterns in Tanzanian households. The authors unearth the nuanced relationship between kerosene and daily life, portraying it as a captivating tango between fuel and flame, not unlike the protagonist and antagonist in a gripping literary narrative.

Venturing beyond the realms of conventional academic literature, we turn our attention to "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, a work that intricately weaves the complexities of modern agriculture with thought-provoking insights, much like a master magician performing sleight of hand with the audience's expectations. In a similar vein, "Cutting for Stone" by Abraham Verghese offers a fictional yet poignantly evocative portrayal of the intertwined fates of individuals and the intricate tapestry of life, as complex and enigmatic as the enigmatic connection we seek to unravel.

Furthermore, in the curious world of social media, we stumbled upon a tweet by @AgriGuru42 that light-heartedly quipped, "GMO cotton and kerosene – a match made in agricultural and energy heaven, or perhaps in the whimsical world of statistical anomalies." This playful musing served as a gentle reminder of the infinite and often absurd possibilities that may arise amidst our pursuit of scholarly understanding.

As we wade deeper into this wondrous sea of interconnectedness between cotton and kerosene, we find ourselves immersed in a tapestry of unexpected correlations and whimsical revelations, akin to stumbling upon a comedic twist in the midst of a solemn play. This paper seeks not only to unearth the empirical link between genetically modified cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania, but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected connections amidst the labyrinth of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Cotton, the fabric of our lives, and kerosene, the fuel that ignites the flames of life in many Tanzanian households, may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a snowflake. However, as we delve into the multifaceted web of agricultural and energy systems, a curious pattern emerges, akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack. We are presented with a conundrum that tickles the intellect and challenges conventional thinking – the seemingly whimsical connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.
GMOs have long been a subject of heated debates and controversies, much like the searing heat of the sun that North Carolina cotton fields endure. Meanwhile, kerosene, with its warm glow and pungent aroma, holds a significant position in the lives of many Tanzanians, akin to a trusted companion on a moonlit night. Our quest to understand the link between these two disparate elements has led us down a meandering path filled with surprises and unexpected delights, reminiscent of a playful journey through a perplexing maze.
The potential intersection of GMO use in cotton cultivation in the United States and kerosene consumption in Tanzania may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, much like a group of intrigued onlookers witnessing a particularly enthralling circus performance. As we navigate through this academic circus, we are reminded of the charm and awe of uncovering unforeseen connections, akin to the enchanting discovery of a hidden treasure amid a pile of mundane debris.
In this paper, we present the results of our rigorous analysis that unearths the fascinating correlation between these seemingly disparate elements. As we unravel the intricate dance of data and statistics, we invite readers to join us in this earnest pursuit of knowledge, and perhaps, to partake in a wry chuckle at the unexpected twist of fate that has brought together the world of cotton and the realm of kerosene in a harmonious and perplexing coexistence.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this peculiar yet captivating academic journey, for as we shall soon reveal, the world of research is indeed a stage where the most unlikely actors take their bows in the grand theater of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania, we employed an eclectic array of research methods that could rival a magician’s bag of tricks. Our data collection primarily relied on information sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, akin to avid botanists scouring the globe for elusive exotic plants.

To commence our investigation, we first merrily hopped on the cybernetic web, spinning a gossamer of search queries across the digital expanse, foraging through the bountiful harvest of datasets and reports from the years 2000 to 2021. This digital expedition resembled a treasure hunt, as we traversed the virtual terrain, picking up nuggets of data as if they were hidden delights in a confectioner’s shop.

After gathering this veritable smorgasbord of information, we donned our analytical hats and unleashed a whirlwind of statistical analyses, ranging from the jovial t-tests to the somber regression models.

It should be noted that our calculations were as precise as a diamond cutter, meticulously unraveling the coiled mystery of correlation coefficients and p-values in a manner reminiscent of Sherlock Holmes untangling a web of clues. Through this rigorous statistical ballet, we attempted to discern any underlying patterns hidden within the seemingly capricious juxtaposition of GMO-laden cotton and the luminous glow of kerosene in Tanzanian households.

Moreover, we didn’t shy away from employing advanced techniques such as multivariate analyses, akin to conducting a symphony with a diverse ensemble of instruments, in an effort to sculpt a harmonious melody from this seemingly discordant confluence of agricultural and energy data.

In our quest for understanding, we also cultivated an appreciation for the intricacies of econometric modeling, where we stitched together a quilt of mathematical functions to map out the relationship between GMO use in cotton cultivation and kerosene consumption, ensuring that the threads of our findings were meticulously woven into a fabric of empirical evidence.

Lastly, to complement our statistical odyssey, we engaged in the time-honored tradition of extensive literature reviews, sifting through academic writings and scholarly tomes with the gusto of a bibliophilic detective hot on the trail of profound insights.

In summation, our methods amalgamated the precision of a clockmaker, the curiosity of a cat, and the tenacity of a bloodhound, ultimately revealing the unexpected correlation between GMO use in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9153513, r-squared of 0.8378680, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Cotton, the fabric of our lives, and kerosene, the fuel that ignites the flames of life in many Tanzanian households, may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a snowflake. However, as we delve into the multifaceted web of agricultural and energy systems, a curious pattern emerges, akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack. We are presented with a conundrum that tickles the intellect and challenges conventional thinking – the seemingly whimsical connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.
GMOs have long been a subject of heated debates and controversies, much like the searing heat of the sun that North Carolina cotton fields endure. Meanwhile, kerosene, with its warm glow and pungent aroma, holds a significant position in the lives of many Tanzanians, akin to a trusted companion on a moonlit night. Our quest to understand the link between these two disparate elements has led us down a meandering path filled with surprises and unexpected delights, reminiscent of a playful journey through a perplexing maze.
The potential intersection of GMO use in cotton cultivation in the United States and kerosene consumption in Tanzania may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, much like a group of intrigued onlookers witnessing a particularly enthralling circus performance. As we navigate through this academic circus, we are reminded of the charm and awe of uncovering unforeseen connections, akin to the enchanting discovery of a hidden treasure amid a pile of mundane debris.
In this paper, we present the results of our rigorous analysis that unearths the fascinating correlation between these seemingly disparate elements. As we unravel the intricate dance of data and statistics, we invite readers to join us in this earnest pursuit of knowledge, and perhaps, to partake in a wry chuckle at the unexpected twist of fate that has brought together the world of cotton and the realm of kerosene in a harmonious and perplexing coexistence.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this peculiar yet captivating academic journey, for as we shall soon reveal, the world of research is indeed a stage where the most unlikely actors take their bows in the grand theater of the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our research revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania during the period from 2000 to 2021. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 signifies a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities, reminiscent of finding the missing piece of a jigsaw puzzle in the unlikeliest of places.

Furthermore, the high R-squared value of 0.8378680 indicates that approximately 83.79% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Tanzania can be explained by the variability in GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. This statistical significance is akin to stumbling upon a rare gem in a haystack – a delightful surprise amidst an expanse of ordinary findings.

Our analysis identified a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a level of statistical significance that would make even the most discerning statistician crack a wry smile. It is as if the data itself was whispering a playful "gotcha" to the skeptical observer, adding an element of whimsy to our academic pursuit.

The included scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly depicts the strong correlation between these seemingly divergent variables, evoking a sense of amusement at the unexpected harmony they exhibit. The juxtaposition of the cotton fields of North Carolina and the earthen floors of Tanzanian households, brought together through the language of statistics, serves as a reminder that the world of research is indeed full of peculiar and delightful twists.

In light of these findings, it becomes evident that the relationship between GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania is not merely a statistical whim, but an intriguing connection worthy of further exploration. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to share in the revelry of unraveling the extraordinary bond that unites these seemingly dissimilar elements, for in the realm of academic inquiry, the unexpected often dons the most captivating and mirthful of disguises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The cornerstone of our exploration is in "The Cotton Connection: How GMOs Revolutionized Cotton Cultivation," by Smith et al. The authors find that the introduction of genetically modified varieties of cotton has significantly impacted the landscape of cotton production, akin to a plucky innovation upsetting the delicate balance of a juggling act. The use of GMOs has led to improved resistance to pests and enhanced yields, transforming the cotton fields of North Carolina into a veritable circus of productivity.
Adding to this insight, a study by Doe et al., "Kerosene and Energy Dynamics in Tanzania," delves into the intricate ecosystem of kerosene consumption and energy patterns in Tanzanian households. The authors unearth the nuanced relationship between kerosene and daily life, portraying it as a captivating tango between fuel and flame, not unlike the protagonist and antagonist in a gripping literary narrative.
Venturing beyond the realms of conventional academic literature, we turn our attention to "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, a work that intricately weaves the complexities of modern agriculture with thought-provoking insights, much like a master magician performing sleight of hand with the audience's expectations. In a similar vein, "Cutting for Stone" by Abraham Verghese offers a fictional yet poignantly evocative portrayal of the intertwined fates of individuals and the intricate tapestry of life, as complex and enigmatic as the enigmatic connection we seek to unravel.
Furthermore, in the curious world of social media, we stumbled upon a tweet by @AgriGuru42 that light-heartedly quipped, "GMO cotton and kerosene – a match made in agricultural and energy heaven, or perhaps in the whimsical world of statistical anomalies." This playful musing served as a gentle reminder of the infinite and often absurd possibilities that may arise amidst our pursuit of scholarly understanding.
As we wade deeper into this wondrous sea of interconnectedness between cotton and kerosene, we find ourselves immersed in a tapestry of unexpected correlations and whimsical revelations, akin to stumbling upon a comedic twist in the midst of a solemn play. This paper seeks not only to unearth the empirical link between genetically modified cotton in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania, but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected connections amidst the labyrinth of academic inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania during the period from 2000 to 2021. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 signifies a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities, reminiscent of finding the missing piece of a jigsaw puzzle in the unlikeliest of places.
Furthermore, the high R-squared value of 0.8378680 indicates that approximately 83.79% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Tanzania can be explained by the variability in GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. This statistical significance is akin to stumbling upon a rare gem in a haystack – a delightful surprise amidst an expanse of ordinary findings.
Our analysis identified a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a level of statistical significance that would make even the most discerning statistician crack a wry smile. It is as if the data itself was whispering a playful "gotcha" to the skeptical observer, adding an element of whimsy to our academic pursuit.
The included scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly depicts the strong correlation between these seemingly divergent variables, evoking a sense of amusement at the unexpected harmony they exhibit. The juxtaposition of the cotton fields of North Carolina and the earthen floors of Tanzanian households, brought together through the language of statistics, serves as a reminder that the world of research is indeed full of peculiar and delightful twists.
In light of these findings, it becomes evident that the relationship between GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania is not merely a statistical whim, but an intriguing connection worthy of further exploration. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to share in the revelry of unraveling the extraordinary bond that unites these seemingly dissimilar elements, for in the realm of academic inquiry, the unexpected often dons the most captivating and mirthful of disguises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The prodigious correlation we uncovered in our study between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania not only reaffirms the hypotheses posited by prior research but also introduces an unexpected comedic twist to the scholarly pursuit of elucidating hitherto unseen connections. Our findings serve as a testament to the Amaranthus of statistical anomalies that thrive amidst the fields of empirical inquiry.

The seminal work by Smith et al. delved into the transformative impacts of GMOs on cotton cultivation, akin to a choreographed performance that led to enhanced yields and robust resistance to pests. Likewise, our study uncovers the delightful waltz between GMO cotton and Tanzanian kerosene consumption, as if they were partners in an intricate dance of statistical significance. This unanticipated coupling adds a layer of whimsical charm to the solemn landscape of academic scrutiny.

Drawing from the insights gleaned from "Kerosene and Energy Dynamics in Tanzania" by Doe et al., we traverse the exuberant realms of kerosene consumption and energy patterns, likening the relationship between kerosene and daily life to a captivating soap opera unfurling within the confines of Tanzanian households. In a perhaps unexpected turn of events, our study upholds and extends these insights, unraveling an unexpected liaison between distant entities with the flair of a dramatic reenactment.

The playful musing tweeted by @AgriGuru42, though seemingly facetious, now emerges as a prescient harbinger of the playful quirkiness that underlies our empirical discovery. The inexplicable harmony we unveil between GMO cotton in North Carolina and kerosene in Tanzania is reminiscent of a witty repartee within the serious discourse of academic pursuit, adding a touch of levity to the rigorous pursuit of knowledge.

In concluding this segment, we invite our esteemed readers to partake in the jubilant revelry that envelops the unraveling of this unexpected alliance, for in the serious pursuit of scholarly inquiry, it is with unbridled joy that we stumble upon the delightful, the humorous, and the utterly improbable connections that shape our understanding of the world.

And now, we turn to the linchpin of every great research paper, the discussion of the results. Our findings exceed the wildest cotton-picking dreams one could have, revealing a truly mind-boggling correlation between GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Let’s join hands, or perhaps better yet, let’s grip some genetically modified golden strands and a jerrycan of kerosene and waltz through the fields of statistical significance together!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in North Carolina and Kerosene used in Tanzania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Cotton, the fabric of our lives, and kerosene, the fuel that ignites the flames of life in many Tanzanian households, may initially seem as unrelated as a pineapple and a snowflake. However, as we delve into the multifaceted web of agricultural and energy systems, a curious pattern emerges, akin to finding a unicorn in a haystack. We are presented with a conundrum that tickles the intellect and challenges conventional thinking – the seemingly whimsical connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania.
GMOs have long been a subject of heated debates and controversies, much like the searing heat of the sun that North Carolina cotton fields endure. Meanwhile, kerosene, with its warm glow and pungent aroma, holds a significant position in the lives of many Tanzanians, akin to a trusted companion on a moonlit night. Our quest to understand the link between these two disparate elements has led us down a meandering path filled with surprises and unexpected delights, reminiscent of a playful journey through a perplexing maze.
The potential intersection of GMO use in cotton cultivation in the United States and kerosene consumption in Tanzania may prompt a raised eyebrow or two, much like a group of intrigued onlookers witnessing a particularly enthralling circus performance. As we navigate through this academic circus, we are reminded of the charm and awe of uncovering unforeseen connections, akin to the enchanting discovery of a hidden treasure amid a pile of mundane debris.
In this paper, we present the results of our rigorous analysis that unearths the fascinating correlation between these seemingly disparate elements. As we unravel the intricate dance of data and statistics, we invite readers to join us in this earnest pursuit of knowledge, and perhaps, to partake in a wry chuckle at the unexpected twist of fate that has brought together the world of cotton and the realm of kerosene in a harmonious and perplexing coexistence.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this peculiar yet captivating academic journey, for as we shall soon reveal, the world of research is indeed a stage where the most unlikely actors take their bows in the grand theater of the unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research revealed a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania during the period from 2000 to 2021. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 signifies a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated entities, reminiscent of finding the missing piece of a jigsaw puzzle in the unlikeliest of places.
Furthermore, the high R-squared value of 0.8378680 indicates that approximately 83.79% of the variability in kerosene consumption in Tanzania can be explained by the variability in GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina. This statistical significance is akin to stumbling upon a rare gem in a haystack – a delightful surprise amidst an expanse of ordinary findings.
Our analysis identified a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a level of statistical significance that would make even the most discerning statistician crack a wry smile. It is as if the data itself was whispering a playful "gotcha" to the skeptical observer, adding an element of whimsy to our academic pursuit.
The included scatterplot (Fig. 1) vividly depicts the strong correlation between these seemingly divergent variables, evoking a sense of amusement at the unexpected harmony they exhibit. The juxtaposition of the cotton fields of North Carolina and the earthen floors of Tanzanian households, brought together through the language of statistics, serves as a reminder that the world of research is indeed full of peculiar and delightful twists.
In light of these findings, it becomes evident that the relationship between GMO use in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania is not merely a statistical whim, but an intriguing connection worthy of further exploration. As we conclude this section, we invite our readers to share in the revelry of unraveling the extraordinary bond that unites these seemingly dissimilar elements, for in the realm of academic inquiry, the unexpected often dons the most captivating and mirthful of disguises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the delightful tapestry of research, our investigation into the intertwined worlds of GMOs in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania has unveiled a connection as surprising as finding a unicorn grazing in a field of cotton. The robust correlation coefficient and the striking R-squared value discovered are akin to stumbling upon a comedic punchline in the midst of a serious academic discourse. The statistical significance that emerged in our results seems to have a mischievous twinkle, as if the data itself were playing a game of hide-and-seek with our expectations. As we wrap up this scholarly expedition, it becomes evident that the link between these seemingly unrelated aspects is no mere happenstance, but a whimsically perplexing relationship worthy of appreciation, much like discovering a secret compartment in an old trunk, filled with unexpected treasures. We hereby assert, with a lighthearted certainty, that no further research in this area is needed; for in the grand comedy of academic inquiry, this discovery stands as an unparalleled act of unexpected humor and amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agro-Comedic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Unlikely Agricultural Pairings Research (SUAPR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Harvesting Laughs: Exploring the Cotton-Kerosene Connection in North Carolina and Tanzania with an abstract of This study endeavors to shed light on the seemingly unrelated yet strangely intertwined realms of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in North Carolina and kerosene consumption in Tanzania. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on an analytical journey to investigate the potentially surprising correlation between these two divergent factors. To our delight (and slight bewilderment), our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9153513 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021. As we navigate through this whimsically incongruous horticultural-energetic nexus, we invite readers to share in the amusement of uncovering surprising connections amid the seemingly disparate; for in the realm of research, the unexpected often unfolds in the most delightful and astonishing ways.

ChatGPT:

cotton cultivation, genetically modified organisms, GMOs, North Carolina, kerosene consumption, Tanzania, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, horticultural-energetic nexus, surprising connections, research, unexpected findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in North Carolina that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in North Carolina

Kerosene used in Tanzania
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Tanzania in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Tanzania

Correlation r = 0.9153513 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8378680 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Tanzania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in North Carolina) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-9. 0.0000000023952460283051626000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 2.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 417,493,647 random variables You don't actually need 417 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in North Carolina (GMO cotton %)1191416181719131915141016231231233
Kerosene used in Tanzania (Million Barrels/Day)1.837462.456662.60492.774332.977953.197893.346143.642633.822763.261424.405041.249512.830110.7835890.6565210.4870951000.3476160.3319030.350214




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,9,14,16,18,17,19,13,19,15,14,10,16,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([1.83746,2.45666,2.6049,2.77433,2.97795,3.19789,3.34614,3.64263,3.82276,3.26142,4.40504,1.24951,2.83011,0.783589,0.656521,0.487095,1,0,0,0.347616,0.331903,0.350214,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Tanzania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2049 · Black Variable ID: 774 · Red Variable ID: 24979
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0