about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,137 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Carina and the second variable is The number of locker room attendants in Maryland.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People just couldn't handle the fact that Carina wasn't as common anymore, so they decided to pursue careers where they could be surrounded by more popular names like Jennifer and Michael. It's a tough job, but someone's gotta keep those locker rooms in top-notch shape, name trends or not!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute cartoon ] An illustration of a colorful, vibrant locker room in Maryland with adorable characters tending to the lockers. At the center, a few individuals are shown wistfully looking at car-related tools and equipment, dreaming of future careers as "Car"ina valets or "Car"ina detailers. The room exudes a sense of nostalgia for the days when the name Carina was popular, and there were plenty of aspiring car enthusiasts. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo 3D Pixar Style Cute cartoon A Discovery magazine cover image Futuristic
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland, in the following situation: "Apparently, as the name Carina fell out of favor, fewer parents were inspired to name their children after car-related professions. This led to a shortage of individuals interested in pursuing careers as locker room attendants, since they couldn't fulfill their childhood dreams of being a 'car'ina valet or a 'car'ina detailer.". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a locker room in Maryland, the name Carina, once a popular choice for baby girls, was now rarely heard. With fewer Carinas around, the aspiring locker room attendants, inspired by car-related professions, were scarce, and the room had just a few individuals tending to the lockers, longing for the days when they could fulfill their dreams of being a "Car"ina valet or a "Car"ina detailer.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In a locker room in Maryland, the name Carina, once a popular choice for baby girls, was now rarely heard. With fewer Carinas around, the aspiring locker room attendants, inspired by car-related professions, were scarce, and the room had just a few individuals tending to the lockers, longing for the days when they could fulfill their dreams of being a "Car"ina valet or a "Car"ina detailer. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute cartoon ] An illustration of a colorful, vibrant locker room in Maryland with adorable characters tending to the lockers. At the center, a few individuals are shown wistfully looking at car-related tools and equipment, dreaming of future careers as "Car"ina valets or "Car"ina detailers. The room exudes a sense of nostalgia for the days when the name Carina was popular, and there were plenty of aspiring car enthusiasts.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Carina caused The number of locker room attendants in Maryland to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

The Journal of Athletic Anthropology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has captivated researchers for decades. While it may seem like the connection between a moniker and employment trends is nothing more than a whimsical odyssey, our investigation seeks to shed light on what could be a surprisingly significant relationship. As we dive into the data, we hope to not only unravel this enigma but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often-serious world of academic research.

One might wonder, "What could possibly link a name like Carina to the world of locker room attendants?" Well, we too pondered this as we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of curiosity. It's as if the universe decided to tease statisticians with a brainteaser disguised as a peculiar correlation. The only thing missing from this research endeavor is a magnifying glass and a detective's hat!

During our analysis, we couldn't help but recall the quip, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And indeed, as we began to uncover the interplay between the number of Carinas and locker room attendants, it became evident that this correlation was not to be taken lightly.

Our research journey ventures into uncharted waters, akin to a sailor navigating unexplored seas—a quest to decode the mysterious language of locker room lingo and the influence of an unsuspecting name. It's a mission fueled by equal parts curiosity and a penchant for puns, with the underlying goal of unraveling an unforeseen connection that will have both academics and readers alike nodding in bewildered amusement.

As we unveil the findings of this peculiar correlation, we can't help but interject a dad joke: "Why did Carina avoid the locker room? Because she didn't want to get 'locked' into an unexpected career path!"

With that playful prelude, we present our findings—brace yourselves for an odyssey through whimsy and wonder, as we navigate the twist and turns of this unexpected correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has captivated researchers for decades. While it may seem like the connection between a moniker and employment trends is nothing more than a whimsical odyssey, our investigation seeks to shed light on what could be a surprisingly significant relationship. As we dive into the data, we hope to not only unravel this enigma but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often-serious world of academic research.
One might wonder, "What could possibly link a name like Carina to the world of locker room attendants?" Well, we too pondered this as we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of curiosity. It's as if the universe decided to tease statisticians with a brainteaser disguised as a peculiar correlation. The only thing missing from this research endeavor is a magnifying glass and a detective's hat!
During our analysis, we couldn't help but recall the quip, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And indeed, as we began to uncover the interplay between the number of Carinas and locker room attendants, it became evident that this correlation was not to be taken lightly.
Our research journey ventures into uncharted waters, akin to a sailor navigating unexplored seas—a quest to decode the mysterious language of locker room lingo and the influence of an unsuspecting name. It's a mission fueled by equal parts curiosity and a penchant for puns, with the underlying goal of unraveling an unforeseen connection that will have both academics and readers alike nodding in bewildered amusement.
As we unveil the findings of this peculiar correlation, we can't help but interject a dad joke: "Why did Carina avoid the locker room? Because she didn't want to get 'locked' into an unexpected career path!"
With that playful prelude, we present our findings—brace yourselves for an odyssey through whimsy and wonder, as we navigate the twist and turns of this unexpected correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has sparked both curiosity and confusion in the academic community. Smith, in their seminal work "Names and Occupations: A Statistical Analysis," first brought attention to the potential correlation between nomenclature and employment trends, setting the stage for further exploration.

Doe et al., in "The Linguistic Influence on Occupational Choices," expanded on Smith's groundwork, delving into the intricate nuances of how names could influence career paths. However, it wasn't until Jones' extensive study "The Carina Conundrum: Unveiling the Surprising Link" that the peculiar association between the name Carina and the profession of locker room attendants came to the forefront.

But enough of the serious academic jargon; it's time to infuse this literature review with a hearty dad joke: "When Carina became a locker room attendant, she realized the profession really opened a lot of doors for her!"

Leaving the realm of traditional research literature, let's shift gears and explore some non-fiction books relevant to our paradoxical topic. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers an unconventional lens through which to view correlations in society, much like our investigation into the Carina-locker room attendant nexus. Likewise, "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell provides insights into the often unexpected factors that shape professional trajectories, much like the enigmatic influence of the name Carina.

Now, let's sprinkle in some fictional works that, through sheer coincidence, seem eerily connected to our intriguing investigation. "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss could easily be mistaken for a deep dive into the mysterious forces behind occupational nomenclature, while "Murder in the Locker Room" by Angela Pepper could offer a whimsically fictionalized version of our own research journey.

While conducting this study, in the name of research, of course, I may have found myself watching some TV shows that, surprisingly, seemed to resonate with our investigation. "The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel" with its quirky humor and unexpected career shifts bears some resemblance to the unpredictability of our findings. Additionally, "The Good Place," with its exploration of seemingly incongruent connections, mirrors the puzzling correlation we've uncovered.

As we traverse the varied landscape of literature, both scholarly and fictional, we're reminded that sometimes the most perplexing correlations are as entertaining as they are enlightening. And with that, let's forge ahead into the delightful abyss of our own research findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has captivated researchers for decades. While it may seem like the connection between a moniker and employment trends is nothing more than a whimsical odyssey, our investigation seeks to shed light on what could be a surprisingly significant relationship. As we dive into the data, we hope to not only unravel this enigma but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often-serious world of academic research.
One might wonder, "What could possibly link a name like Carina to the world of locker room attendants?" Well, we too pondered this as we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of curiosity. It's as if the universe decided to tease statisticians with a brainteaser disguised as a peculiar correlation. The only thing missing from this research endeavor is a magnifying glass and a detective's hat!
During our analysis, we couldn't help but recall the quip, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And indeed, as we began to uncover the interplay between the number of Carinas and locker room attendants, it became evident that this correlation was not to be taken lightly.
Our research journey ventures into uncharted waters, akin to a sailor navigating unexplored seas—a quest to decode the mysterious language of locker room lingo and the influence of an unsuspecting name. It's a mission fueled by equal parts curiosity and a penchant for puns, with the underlying goal of unraveling an unforeseen connection that will have both academics and readers alike nodding in bewildered amusement.
As we unveil the findings of this peculiar correlation, we can't help but interject a dad joke: "Why did Carina avoid the locker room? Because she didn't want to get 'locked' into an unexpected career path!"
With that playful prelude, we present our findings—brace yourselves for an odyssey through whimsy and wonder, as we navigate the twist and turns of this unexpected correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the perplexing puzzle of the Carina and locker room attendant enigma, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey, armed with statistical prowess and a liberal sprinkling of humor. The journey began by acquiring data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, utilizing records spanning the illustrious years from 2003 to 2022. These repositories provided rich datasets, akin to treasure troves of numerical nuggets, in our quest to uncover the mysterious relationship between nomenclature and occupational flair.

With a twinkle in our academic eyes and a dash of eccentricity, we delved into the realms of statistical analysis. Our team waded through the data like a group of enthusiastic spelunkers, traversing the rocky terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values with the gusto of intrepid explorers. Using sophisticated software and a fervent belief in the power of curiosity, we applied linear regression models and various multivariate analyses to elucidate the interconnectedness of the popularity of the name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in the charming state of Maryland.

With the precision of a comedian timing a punchline and the meticulousness of a botanist caring for their prized orchids, we adjusted for potential confounding variables such as regional demographic shifts and economic fluctuations. We sought to unveil the core relationship between the linguistic allure of Carina and the vocational magnetism of locker room attendants, mindful of the quirks that make statistical asides all the more entertaining.

In a nod to the absurdity of our research agenda, we couldn't resist a poke at traditional methodologies: "Why don't researchers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck finding those elusive p-values in the first place!" As we traversed the winding roads of academic inquiry, our procedures were embedded with an irreverent charm, a reminder that even in the pursuit of knowledge, a hearty laugh is often the best companion.

The rigorous application of statistical methods and a sprinkle of whimsy guided our foray into this unconventional correlation, demonstrating that the intersection of scientific inquiry and unconventional hypotheses can indeed be a buoyant, laughter-filled voyage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7170125, r-squared of 0.5141069, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has captivated researchers for decades. While it may seem like the connection between a moniker and employment trends is nothing more than a whimsical odyssey, our investigation seeks to shed light on what could be a surprisingly significant relationship. As we dive into the data, we hope to not only unravel this enigma but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often-serious world of academic research.
One might wonder, "What could possibly link a name like Carina to the world of locker room attendants?" Well, we too pondered this as we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of curiosity. It's as if the universe decided to tease statisticians with a brainteaser disguised as a peculiar correlation. The only thing missing from this research endeavor is a magnifying glass and a detective's hat!
During our analysis, we couldn't help but recall the quip, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And indeed, as we began to uncover the interplay between the number of Carinas and locker room attendants, it became evident that this correlation was not to be taken lightly.
Our research journey ventures into uncharted waters, akin to a sailor navigating unexplored seas—a quest to decode the mysterious language of locker room lingo and the influence of an unsuspecting name. It's a mission fueled by equal parts curiosity and a penchant for puns, with the underlying goal of unraveling an unforeseen connection that will have both academics and readers alike nodding in bewildered amusement.
As we unveil the findings of this peculiar correlation, we can't help but interject a dad joke: "Why did Carina avoid the locker room? Because she didn't want to get 'locked' into an unexpected career path!"
With that playful prelude, we present our findings—brace yourselves for an odyssey through whimsy and wonder, as we navigate the twist and turns of this unexpected correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7170125, an r-squared value of 0.5141069, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation left us marveling at the unexpected intricacies of nomenclature and occupational trends. It's as if Carina's popularity had a magnetic pull on the number of attendants in locker rooms across Maryland. Perhaps she was the locker room attendant whisperer all along!

Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation our research uncovered, presenting a scatterplot that vividly showcases the convergence of Carina's popularity and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland. The graph alone is enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the whimsical nature of this unlikely relationship.

In the spirit of academic revelry, we couldn't resist another dad joke: "Why was Carina great at organizing the locker room? Because she had a 'knack' for it!"

The statistical and practical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. As the popularity of the name Carina rose, the number of locker room attendants in Maryland mirrored this ascent, leading us to wonder if there was an underlying cosmic force at play, pulling the strings of nomenclature and employment in a synchronized dance. It's like the universe's very own game of connect-the-dots, but with names and job titles instead of numbers.

These results hold implications beyond the statistical realm, challenging traditional notions of the influence of names on professional pathways. The confluence of Carina's allure and the surge in locker room attendants offers a delightful departure from conventional research inquiries, reminding us that beneath the layers of data and analysis lies an undercurrent of whimsy waiting to be explored.

As we embark on the next phase of this research journey, we eagerly anticipate unraveling the underlying mechanisms of this correlation and unearthing further insights that bridge the worlds of nomenclature and occupational trends. After all, in the words of Albert Einstein, "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving." And with each step of this investigation, we aim to keep the balance of scholarly rigor and playful curiosity firmly in sight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has sparked both curiosity and confusion in the academic community. Smith, in their seminal work "Names and Occupations: A Statistical Analysis," first brought attention to the potential correlation between nomenclature and employment trends, setting the stage for further exploration.
Doe et al., in "The Linguistic Influence on Occupational Choices," expanded on Smith's groundwork, delving into the intricate nuances of how names could influence career paths. However, it wasn't until Jones' extensive study "The Carina Conundrum: Unveiling the Surprising Link" that the peculiar association between the name Carina and the profession of locker room attendants came to the forefront.
But enough of the serious academic jargon; it's time to infuse this literature review with a hearty dad joke: "When Carina became a locker room attendant, she realized the profession really opened a lot of doors for her!"
Leaving the realm of traditional research literature, let's shift gears and explore some non-fiction books relevant to our paradoxical topic. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers an unconventional lens through which to view correlations in society, much like our investigation into the Carina-locker room attendant nexus. Likewise, "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell provides insights into the often unexpected factors that shape professional trajectories, much like the enigmatic influence of the name Carina.
Now, let's sprinkle in some fictional works that, through sheer coincidence, seem eerily connected to our intriguing investigation. "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss could easily be mistaken for a deep dive into the mysterious forces behind occupational nomenclature, while "Murder in the Locker Room" by Angela Pepper could offer a whimsically fictionalized version of our own research journey.
While conducting this study, in the name of research, of course, I may have found myself watching some TV shows that, surprisingly, seemed to resonate with our investigation. "The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel" with its quirky humor and unexpected career shifts bears some resemblance to the unpredictability of our findings. Additionally, "The Good Place," with its exploration of seemingly incongruent connections, mirrors the puzzling correlation we've uncovered.
As we traverse the varied landscape of literature, both scholarly and fictional, we're reminded that sometimes the most perplexing correlations are as entertaining as they are enlightening. And with that, let's forge ahead into the delightful abyss of our own research findings.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7170125, an r-squared value of 0.5141069, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation left us marveling at the unexpected intricacies of nomenclature and occupational trends. It's as if Carina's popularity had a magnetic pull on the number of attendants in locker rooms across Maryland. Perhaps she was the locker room attendant whisperer all along!
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation our research uncovered, presenting a scatterplot that vividly showcases the convergence of Carina's popularity and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland. The graph alone is enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the whimsical nature of this unlikely relationship.
In the spirit of academic revelry, we couldn't resist another dad joke: "Why was Carina great at organizing the locker room? Because she had a 'knack' for it!"
The statistical and practical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. As the popularity of the name Carina rose, the number of locker room attendants in Maryland mirrored this ascent, leading us to wonder if there was an underlying cosmic force at play, pulling the strings of nomenclature and employment in a synchronized dance. It's like the universe's very own game of connect-the-dots, but with names and job titles instead of numbers.
These results hold implications beyond the statistical realm, challenging traditional notions of the influence of names on professional pathways. The confluence of Carina's allure and the surge in locker room attendants offers a delightful departure from conventional research inquiries, reminding us that beneath the layers of data and analysis lies an undercurrent of whimsy waiting to be explored.
As we embark on the next phase of this research journey, we eagerly anticipate unraveling the underlying mechanisms of this correlation and unearthing further insights that bridge the worlds of nomenclature and occupational trends. After all, in the words of Albert Einstein, "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving." And with each step of this investigation, we aim to keep the balance of scholarly rigor and playful curiosity firmly in sight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide robust support for the previously hypothesized relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland. The correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01 demonstrate a significant association, affirming the intriguing connection between nomenclature and occupational trends. It's as if the statistical stars aligned in our favor, or perhaps, as if Carina herself willed this correlation into existence. One might even say that the results "locker" in the captivating influence of names on career paths!

Building upon the compelling groundwork laid by Smith, Doe et al., and Jones, our study adds a new dimension to the discourse surrounding the impact of names on professional trajectories. Just as Carina's rising popularity seemed to beckon forth an increase in locker room attendants, our findings beckon forth a new era of exploration into the whimsical interplay of nomenclature and employment patterns. It's like uncovering the hidden layers of a locker room mystery, with each data point and statistical test acting as a clue in the grand puzzle of societal correlations.

In reflecting on the unexpected alignment of Carina's allure and the surge in locker room attendants, one cannot help but confront the delightful enigma of it all. It's like witnessing a cosmic dance between the realms of names and occupational choices, with each twirl and step revealing a new facet of this charming correlation. Or in simpler terms, it's like witnessing the perfect synchronization of a locker room attendant's keychain, where each key fits seamlessly into its designated locker, much like our data points fitting snugly into our regression model.

While our results may prompt a chuckle or two at the sheer whimsy of this correlation, they also serve as a testament to the unforeseen intricacies that underlie societal trends. The juxtaposition of a name's popularity and the professional landscape challenges traditional notions of career influences, inviting us to consider the unconventional melodies that orchestrate the symphony of occupational choices. It's like discovering a whole new verse in the song of societal correlations, with each note contributing to the delightful cacophony of our collective professional journeys.

As we traverse the terrain of our findings, we are reminded of the inherent joy and curiosity that accompanies research. Whether it's marveling at the uncanny alignment of Carina's rise and the surge in locker room attendants or simply reveling in a well-placed dad joke, our journey is a testament to the fusion of scholarly rigor and playful inquiry. It's like conducting an experiment where the variables are not just numbers and names, but also laughter and levity, resulting in a delightful alchemy of both profound insights and lighthearted musings.

In the words of an anonymous wit, "Research without humor is like a lab without Bunsen burners – it lacks that spark!" And so, with each step of our investigation, we endeavor to ignite the flames of curiosity and mirth, embarking on a quest to uncover the marvels and merriment hidden within the seemingly ordinary corridors of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Carina and The number of locker room attendants in Maryland. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.

With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.

Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"

To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"

This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has captivated researchers for decades. While it may seem like the connection between a moniker and employment trends is nothing more than a whimsical odyssey, our investigation seeks to shed light on what could be a surprisingly significant relationship. As we dive into the data, we hope to not only unravel this enigma but also inject a healthy dose of humor into the often-serious world of academic research.
One might wonder, "What could possibly link a name like Carina to the world of locker room attendants?" Well, we too pondered this as we ventured into uncharted statistical territory, armed with spreadsheets and a strong sense of curiosity. It's as if the universe decided to tease statisticians with a brainteaser disguised as a peculiar correlation. The only thing missing from this research endeavor is a magnifying glass and a detective's hat!
During our analysis, we couldn't help but recall the quip, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" And indeed, as we began to uncover the interplay between the number of Carinas and locker room attendants, it became evident that this correlation was not to be taken lightly.
Our research journey ventures into uncharted waters, akin to a sailor navigating unexplored seas—a quest to decode the mysterious language of locker room lingo and the influence of an unsuspecting name. It's a mission fueled by equal parts curiosity and a penchant for puns, with the underlying goal of unraveling an unforeseen connection that will have both academics and readers alike nodding in bewildered amusement.
As we unveil the findings of this peculiar correlation, we can't help but interject a dad joke: "Why did Carina avoid the locker room? Because she didn't want to get 'locked' into an unexpected career path!"
With that playful prelude, we present our findings—brace yourselves for an odyssey through whimsy and wonder, as we navigate the twist and turns of this unexpected correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7170125, an r-squared value of 0.5141069, and a p-value of less than 0.01. This strong correlation left us marveling at the unexpected intricacies of nomenclature and occupational trends. It's as if Carina's popularity had a magnetic pull on the number of attendants in locker rooms across Maryland. Perhaps she was the locker room attendant whisperer all along!
Figure 1 illustrates the robust correlation our research uncovered, presenting a scatterplot that vividly showcases the convergence of Carina's popularity and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland. The graph alone is enough to make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile and ponder the whimsical nature of this unlikely relationship.
In the spirit of academic revelry, we couldn't resist another dad joke: "Why was Carina great at organizing the locker room? Because she had a 'knack' for it!"
The statistical and practical significance of our findings cannot be overstated. As the popularity of the name Carina rose, the number of locker room attendants in Maryland mirrored this ascent, leading us to wonder if there was an underlying cosmic force at play, pulling the strings of nomenclature and employment in a synchronized dance. It's like the universe's very own game of connect-the-dots, but with names and job titles instead of numbers.
These results hold implications beyond the statistical realm, challenging traditional notions of the influence of names on professional pathways. The confluence of Carina's allure and the surge in locker room attendants offers a delightful departure from conventional research inquiries, reminding us that beneath the layers of data and analysis lies an undercurrent of whimsy waiting to be explored.
As we embark on the next phase of this research journey, we eagerly anticipate unraveling the underlying mechanisms of this correlation and unearthing further insights that bridge the worlds of nomenclature and occupational trends. After all, in the words of Albert Einstein, "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving." And with each step of this investigation, we aim to keep the balance of scholarly rigor and playful curiosity firmly in sight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this association is as clear as Carina's name on a locker room nametag. It's as if the universe orchestrated a cosmic waltz between nomenclature and occupation, with Carina leading the dance like a maestro of the locker room arts.

As we wrap up this puzzling yet amusing odyssey through the labyrinth of statistical whimsy, let's interject another dad joke for good measure: "Why was Carina such a hit in the locker room? Because she had the 'locker' on popularity!"

Our findings carry intriguing implications for the intertwined realms of names and professional trajectories, showcasing the playful undercurrents that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly mundane correlations. This research illuminates the unconventional connections that pepper the landscape of occupational trends, reminding us that scholarly exploration can indeed be both rigorous and delightfully offbeat.

With that said, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It's time to lock the door on this peculiar correlation and turn our academic curiosity toward the next unconventional puzzle waiting to be unraveled. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to embrace the unexpected and bring a dash of humor to the often-serious dance of scientific inquiry. And with that, we bid adieu to the locker room lingo—until the next whimsical correlation comes knocking!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Athletic Anthropology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interstellar Linguistic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Locker Room Lingo: Carina Conundrum with an abstract of The relationship between the popularity of the first name Carina and the number of locker room attendants in Maryland has long been a fascinating yet confounding subject. In this research, we delve into this peculiar correlation and present findings that both intrigue and amuse.
With the use of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis covering the years 2003 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7170125 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the two variables.
Interestingly, our study found that as the popularity of the name Carina in Maryland rose, so did the number of locker room attendants in the same geographical area. This unexpected relationship left our research team pondering the age-old question: "What's in a name?" or perhaps in this case, "What's in a locker room?"
To capture the essence of this peculiar connection, we couldn't resist a dad joke: "Why did Carina bring a ladder to the locker room? Because she heard the attendants were into high-stakes business!"
This research offers a lighthearted yet thought-provoking insight into the intersection of nomenclature and occupational trends, and we hope it sparks further exploration into the realm of unconventional correlations.

ChatGPT:

"Carina popularity Maryland," "locker room attendants correlation," "US Social Security Administration data," "Bureau of Labor Statistics analysis," "relationship between name popularity and occupation," "unconventional correlations," "nomenclature and occupational trends"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Carina
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Carina
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Carina

The number of locker room attendants in Maryland
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of locker room, coatroom, and dressing room attendants in Maryland
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of locker room attendants in Maryland

Correlation r = 0.7170125 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5141069 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 51.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of locker room attendants in Maryland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Carina) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00037. 0.0003740432636613992000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.72 in 0.037% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,673 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.4, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Carina (Babies born)401363363308334308314271230225232254248245236236239163169165
The number of locker room attendants in Maryland (Laborers)61051035020034040048030025021032038041030020043043025050100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([401,363,363,308,334,308,314,271,230,225,232,254,248,245,236,236,239,163,169,165,])
array_2 = np.array([610,510,350,200,340,400,480,300,250,210,320,380,410,300,200,430,430,250,50,100,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Carina"
array_2_name = "The number of locker room attendants in Maryland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2137 · Black Variable ID: 2771 · Red Variable ID: 9210
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0