about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,574 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Romania.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the psychiatric aides in Minnesota perfected the art of "plane" old positive reinforcement, their uplifting energy inadvertently sparked a desire for personal growth in Romania. The end result? A skyrocketing demand for jet fuel to help people in Romania take off on their own emotional journeys.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene Minnesota mental health institution, where a line of psychiatric aides, disguised as humans, stands in formation, silently observing the patients. Their alien technology hums quietly in the background as they collect data on human behavior. Suddenly, a ripple in the Earth's electromagnetic field causes a commotion, leading to a chain reaction that resonates across the globe. In Romania, a gleaming jet fuel production facility is momentarily disrupted as the strange disturbance manifests itself in a stream of vibrant light, casting an otherworldly glow on the surrounding landscape. The scene should capture the juxtaposition of the simple, serene setting of the mental health institution with the otherworldly disruption in Romania. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Woodblock painting Steampunk Sci-fi fantacy Cutsy art illustration
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania, in the following situation: The psychiatric aides in Minnesota were secretly aliens collecting data on human behavior. Their departure caused a disturbance in the Earth's electromagnetic field, leading to a chain reaction that ultimately influenced the production of jet fuel in Romania.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a serene Minnesota mental health institution, a line of psychiatric aides, disguised as humans, stand in formation, silently observing the patients. Their alien technology hums quietly in the background as they collect data on human behavior. Suddenly, a ripple in the Earth's electromagnetic field causes a commotion, leading to a chain reaction that resonates across the globe. In Romania, a gleaming jet fuel production facility is momentarily disrupted as the strange disturbance manifests itself in a stream of vibrant light, casting an otherworldly glow on the surrounding landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: In a serene Minnesota mental health institution, a line of psychiatric aides, disguised as humans, stand in formation, silently observing the patients. Their alien technology hums quietly in the background as they collect data on human behavior. Suddenly, a ripple in the Earth's electromagnetic field causes a commotion, leading to a chain reaction that resonates across the globe. In Romania, a gleaming jet fuel production facility is momentarily disrupted as the strange disturbance manifests itself in a stream of vibrant light, casting an otherworldly glow on the surrounding landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene Minnesota mental health institution, where a line of psychiatric aides, disguised as humans, stands in formation, silently observing the patients. Their alien technology hums quietly in the background as they collect data on human behavior. Suddenly, a ripple in the Earth's electromagnetic field causes a commotion, leading to a chain reaction that resonates across the globe. In Romania, a gleaming jet fuel production facility is momentarily disrupted as the strange disturbance manifests itself in a stream of vibrant light, casting an otherworldly glow on the surrounding landscape. The scene should capture the juxtaposition of the simple, serene setting of the mental health institution with the otherworldly disruption in Romania.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota caused Jet fuel used in Romania to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection

Journal of Neurological Novelties

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As scientific explorers, we often find ourselves traversing uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the mysteries of our world. While some connections are as clear as a microscope slide, others may appear as improbable as a lab rat composing a symphony. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the enigmatic link between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania – a correlation as unexpected as discovering a caffeine addict in a decaf-only establishment!

Our investigation into this seemingly unrelated pair of variables was sparked by a serendipitous encounter at a research conference, where an economist and a psychiatrist walked into a statistical analysis seminar. The ensuing conversation led to an exchange of data, and our exploration began in earnest. After all, what better way to demonstrate the synergy between seemingly disparate fields than to uncover a correlation coefficient as surprising as finding a brain teaser in a medical journal!

Before delving into the empirical evidence, it is essential to appreciate the significance of our inquiry. By connecting the labor market dynamics in Minnesota with the energy consumption patterns in Romania, we not only challenge conventional wisdom but also bring to light the unforeseen intersections of human activity. It's as if the psychiatric aides are whispering words of encouragement to the jet fuel, giving it the much-needed boost to soar to new heights – not unlike an unexpected punchline brightening up a statistics symposium!

In conducting our analysis, we employed rigorous methodologies to ensure the robustness of our findings. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we subjected the variables to rigorous statistical scrutiny, using tools that were as precise as a calibrated scalpel in the hands of a skilled surgeon. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 – a statistical achievement as remarkable as discovering a hidden treasure in a complex data set!

As we unveil the findings of our investigation, it is important to remember that, much like a well-crafted joke, scientific discoveries often defy expectations and challenge preconceived notions. This study serves as a reminder that the essence of great research lies in the ability to embrace the unexpected, to seek correlations where none may seem apparent. After all, who would have thought that the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the jet fuel consumed in Romania would exhibit such a compelling relationship—an unexpected duo worthy of the spotlight in the scientific hall of fame!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As scientific explorers, we often find ourselves traversing uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the mysteries of our world. While some connections are as clear as a microscope slide, others may appear as improbable as a lab rat composing a symphony. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the enigmatic link between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania – a correlation as unexpected as discovering a caffeine addict in a decaf-only establishment!
Our investigation into this seemingly unrelated pair of variables was sparked by a serendipitous encounter at a research conference, where an economist and a psychiatrist walked into a statistical analysis seminar. The ensuing conversation led to an exchange of data, and our exploration began in earnest. After all, what better way to demonstrate the synergy between seemingly disparate fields than to uncover a correlation coefficient as surprising as finding a brain teaser in a medical journal!
Before delving into the empirical evidence, it is essential to appreciate the significance of our inquiry. By connecting the labor market dynamics in Minnesota with the energy consumption patterns in Romania, we not only challenge conventional wisdom but also bring to light the unforeseen intersections of human activity. It's as if the psychiatric aides are whispering words of encouragement to the jet fuel, giving it the much-needed boost to soar to new heights – not unlike an unexpected punchline brightening up a statistics symposium!
In conducting our analysis, we employed rigorous methodologies to ensure the robustness of our findings. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we subjected the variables to rigorous statistical scrutiny, using tools that were as precise as a calibrated scalpel in the hands of a skilled surgeon. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 – a statistical achievement as remarkable as discovering a hidden treasure in a complex data set!
As we unveil the findings of our investigation, it is important to remember that, much like a well-crafted joke, scientific discoveries often defy expectations and challenge preconceived notions. This study serves as a reminder that the essence of great research lies in the ability to embrace the unexpected, to seek correlations where none may seem apparent. After all, who would have thought that the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the jet fuel consumed in Romania would exhibit such a compelling relationship—an unexpected duo worthy of the spotlight in the scientific hall of fame!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Mind Matters: The Role of Psychiatric Aides in Modern Healthcare" by Smith et al., the authors find a strong correlation between the number of psychiatric aides and the overall well-being of patients. It's as if the aides are the unsung heroes, providing mental fuel for the individuals in their care, much like a good cup of coffee jumpstarts our mornings.

Similarly, in "Jet Propulsion: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fuel Usage in Aeronautics" by Doe and Jones, the authors explore the intricate relationship between jet fuel consumption and the operational efficiency of aircraft. Their findings highlight the vital role of fuel in propelling planes to new heights, akin to how a good punchline propels a stand-up comedian's career forward.

Building on these foundational studies, we turn to "The Workplace Dynamics of Minnesota: Trends and Insights" by Brown and Green, which sheds light on the labor market trends in Minnesota, including the employment of psychiatric aides. It's as if the authors are unravelling a mystery, much like a detective piecing together clues, trying to decipher the connection between psychiatric care and jet fuel in Romania.

Now, let's dig a little deeper into the literature and consider "Jet Lag: Understanding the Challenges of International Travel" by Walker and White. While not directly related to jet fuel usage, this work provides valuable insights into the effects of long-distance travel, reminding us that even the most unexpected journeys can lead to unforeseen connections. It's as if the authors are charting new territory, navigating unexplored correlations much like a pilot navigating through turbulent skies.

Shifting gears, we come to "The Silent Language of Emotions" by Goleman, a work that highlights the importance of emotional support in various settings. One could say that the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing a special kind of "fuel" to their patients, much like the way a good dad joke provides a burst of laughter in unexpected places.

Turning to the world of fiction, "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" by Stieg Larsson and "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown offer thrilling tales of mystery and intrigue. While they may not directly relate to our topic, they remind us of the unexpected connections that can emerge from seemingly unrelated elements, much like the surprising correlation between psychiatric aides and jet fuel usage.

Finally, in the realm of cinema, "Catch Me If You Can" directed by Steven Spielberg, and "Up in the Air" starring George Clooney, explore the complexities of travel and human connections. While not explicitly about psychiatric aides or jet fuel, these films capture the essence of unexpected encounters and the interwoven nature of human experiences, reminiscent of our surprising findings.

As we journey through this eclectic mix of literature and media, we are reminded that unexpected connections can often lead to remarkable discoveries, much like stumbling upon a great dad joke in the midst of a serious academic paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As scientific explorers, we often find ourselves traversing uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the mysteries of our world. While some connections are as clear as a microscope slide, others may appear as improbable as a lab rat composing a symphony. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the enigmatic link between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania – a correlation as unexpected as discovering a caffeine addict in a decaf-only establishment!
Our investigation into this seemingly unrelated pair of variables was sparked by a serendipitous encounter at a research conference, where an economist and a psychiatrist walked into a statistical analysis seminar. The ensuing conversation led to an exchange of data, and our exploration began in earnest. After all, what better way to demonstrate the synergy between seemingly disparate fields than to uncover a correlation coefficient as surprising as finding a brain teaser in a medical journal!
Before delving into the empirical evidence, it is essential to appreciate the significance of our inquiry. By connecting the labor market dynamics in Minnesota with the energy consumption patterns in Romania, we not only challenge conventional wisdom but also bring to light the unforeseen intersections of human activity. It's as if the psychiatric aides are whispering words of encouragement to the jet fuel, giving it the much-needed boost to soar to new heights – not unlike an unexpected punchline brightening up a statistics symposium!
In conducting our analysis, we employed rigorous methodologies to ensure the robustness of our findings. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we subjected the variables to rigorous statistical scrutiny, using tools that were as precise as a calibrated scalpel in the hands of a skilled surgeon. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 – a statistical achievement as remarkable as discovering a hidden treasure in a complex data set!
As we unveil the findings of our investigation, it is important to remember that, much like a well-crafted joke, scientific discoveries often defy expectations and challenge preconceived notions. This study serves as a reminder that the essence of great research lies in the ability to embrace the unexpected, to seek correlations where none may seem apparent. After all, who would have thought that the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the jet fuel consumed in Romania would exhibit such a compelling relationship—an unexpected duo worthy of the spotlight in the scientific hall of fame!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the tangled web of the psychiatric aides' influence on the jet fuel consumption in Romania, we embarked on a research journey worthy of a daring expedition through uncharted territories. Picture Indiana Jones armed with regression models and statistical software instead of a bullwhip! Our data collection, like a well-crafted punchline, relied on a comedic blend of precision and serendipity, drawing from the illustrious databases of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the years 2003 to 2018. We also scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the digital wilderness like intrepid explorers in search of the elusive connection.

The initial step in our research odyssey involved quantifying the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the consumption of jet fuel in Romania. We crafted a clever algorithm, a scientific equivalent of a stand-up comedian's timing, to harmonize these disparate datasets, ensuring their compatibility like a well-paired wine and cheese. With each data point meticulously handled, we constructed a comprehensive dataset that encapsulated the intriguing dance of psychiatric care in Minnesota and the roars of jet engines in Romania.

Our statistical analysis, akin to testing the punchlines of a comedian, involved employing the revered spearman rank correlation coefficient to discern the nature of the connection. This robust statistical tool, as reliable as a well-tuned instrument in an orchestra, allowed us to measure the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. With each calculation, we sifted through the data like expert comedians crafting the perfect joke, seeking the elusive essence of correlation beneath the surface of the numbers.

Furthermore, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses, resembling the refined adjustments to the timing of a pun, to ensure the stability of our findings across different periods within the 2003-2018 timeframe. This intricate process, much like fine-tuning an impeccable comedic performance, necessitated a meticulous examination of the data's nuances, ensuring that each result resonated with statistical precision and relevance.

Lastly, we wielded the mighty sword of regression analysis, crafting a model as powerful as a comedian's charismatic stage presence, to disentangle the complex web of factors influencing the interaction between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the demand for jet fuel in Romania. Through this analytical prowess, we brought forth a compelling narrative, much like a stand-up routine that unfolds with captivating precision, illuminating the essence of this unlikely association.

Our scientific escapade, as exhilarating as a night at a comedy club, encapsulated the essence of scientific inquiry, blending rigor and intellectual daring to shed light on unexpected connections. Through these methodological endeavors, we unearthed a correlation as intriguing as a comedic plot twist, revealing the interconnected dance of psychiatric care and jet fuel consumption – a duo that defies convention and invites future exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8888515, r-squared of 0.7900569, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As scientific explorers, we often find ourselves traversing uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the mysteries of our world. While some connections are as clear as a microscope slide, others may appear as improbable as a lab rat composing a symphony. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the enigmatic link between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania – a correlation as unexpected as discovering a caffeine addict in a decaf-only establishment!
Our investigation into this seemingly unrelated pair of variables was sparked by a serendipitous encounter at a research conference, where an economist and a psychiatrist walked into a statistical analysis seminar. The ensuing conversation led to an exchange of data, and our exploration began in earnest. After all, what better way to demonstrate the synergy between seemingly disparate fields than to uncover a correlation coefficient as surprising as finding a brain teaser in a medical journal!
Before delving into the empirical evidence, it is essential to appreciate the significance of our inquiry. By connecting the labor market dynamics in Minnesota with the energy consumption patterns in Romania, we not only challenge conventional wisdom but also bring to light the unforeseen intersections of human activity. It's as if the psychiatric aides are whispering words of encouragement to the jet fuel, giving it the much-needed boost to soar to new heights – not unlike an unexpected punchline brightening up a statistics symposium!
In conducting our analysis, we employed rigorous methodologies to ensure the robustness of our findings. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we subjected the variables to rigorous statistical scrutiny, using tools that were as precise as a calibrated scalpel in the hands of a skilled surgeon. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 – a statistical achievement as remarkable as discovering a hidden treasure in a complex data set!
As we unveil the findings of our investigation, it is important to remember that, much like a well-crafted joke, scientific discoveries often defy expectations and challenge preconceived notions. This study serves as a reminder that the essence of great research lies in the ability to embrace the unexpected, to seek correlations where none may seem apparent. After all, who would have thought that the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the jet fuel consumed in Romania would exhibit such a compelling relationship—an unexpected duo worthy of the spotlight in the scientific hall of fame!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.8888515 between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the consumption of jet fuel in Romania from 2003 to 2018. This correlation coefficient is as robust as the caffeine content in a double shot espresso – it's a jolt of statistical power that leaves no room for decaffeinated doubt!

Our findings further showcased an r-squared value of 0.7900569, emphasizing the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota whispered words of encouragement to the jet fuel, propelling it to new heights of energy consumption – a dynamic duo as unexpected as finding a chemistry joke in an economics textbook!

The significance level of p < 0.01 cemented the credibility of our results, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This level of significance is as rare as spotting a unicorn in a laboratory – a statistical marvel that demands attention and further exploration.

Moreover, our research team constructed a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually illustrate the compelling relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and jet fuel consumption. The scatterplot showcases the data points aligning in a manner as harmonious as a perfectly timed punchline, reinforcing the strength of the correlation we uncovered. It's the kind of visual representation that would make even a skeptic crack a smile and nod in agreement – a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis.

In summary, our empirical investigation into the connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and jet fuel usage in Romania has yielded results that challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the enigmatic nature of statistical relationships. This correlation, akin to finding humor in unexpected places, serves as a reminder that scientific inquiry often leads us down unexpected paths, where even the most unlikely variables can reveal meaningful connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Mind Matters: The Role of Psychiatric Aides in Modern Healthcare" by Smith et al., the authors find a strong correlation between the number of psychiatric aides and the overall well-being of patients. It's as if the aides are the unsung heroes, providing mental fuel for the individuals in their care, much like a good cup of coffee jumpstarts our mornings.
Similarly, in "Jet Propulsion: A Comprehensive Analysis of Fuel Usage in Aeronautics" by Doe and Jones, the authors explore the intricate relationship between jet fuel consumption and the operational efficiency of aircraft. Their findings highlight the vital role of fuel in propelling planes to new heights, akin to how a good punchline propels a stand-up comedian's career forward.
Building on these foundational studies, we turn to "The Workplace Dynamics of Minnesota: Trends and Insights" by Brown and Green, which sheds light on the labor market trends in Minnesota, including the employment of psychiatric aides. It's as if the authors are unravelling a mystery, much like a detective piecing together clues, trying to decipher the connection between psychiatric care and jet fuel in Romania.
Now, let's dig a little deeper into the literature and consider "Jet Lag: Understanding the Challenges of International Travel" by Walker and White. While not directly related to jet fuel usage, this work provides valuable insights into the effects of long-distance travel, reminding us that even the most unexpected journeys can lead to unforeseen connections. It's as if the authors are charting new territory, navigating unexplored correlations much like a pilot navigating through turbulent skies.
Shifting gears, we come to "The Silent Language of Emotions" by Goleman, a work that highlights the importance of emotional support in various settings. One could say that the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing a special kind of "fuel" to their patients, much like the way a good dad joke provides a burst of laughter in unexpected places.
Turning to the world of fiction, "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" by Stieg Larsson and "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown offer thrilling tales of mystery and intrigue. While they may not directly relate to our topic, they remind us of the unexpected connections that can emerge from seemingly unrelated elements, much like the surprising correlation between psychiatric aides and jet fuel usage.
Finally, in the realm of cinema, "Catch Me If You Can" directed by Steven Spielberg, and "Up in the Air" starring George Clooney, explore the complexities of travel and human connections. While not explicitly about psychiatric aides or jet fuel, these films capture the essence of unexpected encounters and the interwoven nature of human experiences, reminiscent of our surprising findings.
As we journey through this eclectic mix of literature and media, we are reminded that unexpected connections can often lead to remarkable discoveries, much like stumbling upon a great dad joke in the midst of a serious academic paper.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.8888515 between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the consumption of jet fuel in Romania from 2003 to 2018. This correlation coefficient is as robust as the caffeine content in a double shot espresso – it's a jolt of statistical power that leaves no room for decaffeinated doubt!
Our findings further showcased an r-squared value of 0.7900569, emphasizing the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota whispered words of encouragement to the jet fuel, propelling it to new heights of energy consumption – a dynamic duo as unexpected as finding a chemistry joke in an economics textbook!
The significance level of p < 0.01 cemented the credibility of our results, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This level of significance is as rare as spotting a unicorn in a laboratory – a statistical marvel that demands attention and further exploration.
Moreover, our research team constructed a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually illustrate the compelling relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and jet fuel consumption. The scatterplot showcases the data points aligning in a manner as harmonious as a perfectly timed punchline, reinforcing the strength of the correlation we uncovered. It's the kind of visual representation that would make even a skeptic crack a smile and nod in agreement – a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis.
In summary, our empirical investigation into the connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and jet fuel usage in Romania has yielded results that challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the enigmatic nature of statistical relationships. This correlation, akin to finding humor in unexpected places, serves as a reminder that scientific inquiry often leads us down unexpected paths, where even the most unlikely variables can reveal meaningful connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
Our investigation into the association between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the consumption of jet fuel in Romania has unveiled an intriguing and robust correlation, rekindling memories of discovering a good "chemistry" joke in an economics textbook. Our findings not only support previous research on the importance of psychiatric aides in patient well-being but also offer a unique perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate variables - it's as if the psychiatric aides are providing a type of "jet therapy" to the fuel in Romania, propelling it to new statistical heights.

Building on Smith et al.'s work, our results underscore the pivotal role of psychiatric aides in promoting overall well-being. Their impact seems to extend beyond individual patients, reaching jet fuel consumption in Romania, much like a well-timed joke that spreads laughter in unexpected places. Similarly, Doe and Jones' exploration of jet fuel usage is reinforced by our findings, emphasizing how seemingly unrelated elements can come together in surprising ways, much like finding humor in unexpected correlations.

Our study aligns with Brown and Green's examination of labor market trends in Minnesota, shedding light on the workforce dynamics of psychiatric care. It appears that this workforce exerts a broader influence, touching even the skies in distant Romania, much like a running gag that transcends borders. Furthermore, our results echo the insights from "Jet Lag: Understanding the Challenges of International Travel," elucidating how jet fuel usage is not just a technical matter but also a reflection of interconnected global dynamics, much like the interconnectedness of data points in our scatterplot - it's as if the statistical patterns tell a joke of their own.

In addition, Goleman's emphasis on emotional support finds an unexpected parallel in our findings, as the psychiatric aides in Minnesota seem to be "fueling" a broader spectrum of care, resonating with the unexpected interconnections we've unraveled. Even in the world of fiction and cinema, our research serves as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis, much like a clever twist in a compelling narrative.

By shedding light on this unlikely association, our study challenges conventional paradigms and encourages a broader perspective in scientific inquiry. It reminds us that even in the most unexpected places, meaningful connections can be found, keeping the spirit of discovery and exploration alive - just like the thrill of stumbling upon a good dad joke in the most serious of academic settings!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and Jet fuel used in Romania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As scientific explorers, we often find ourselves traversing uncharted territories, seeking to unravel the mysteries of our world. While some connections are as clear as a microscope slide, others may appear as improbable as a lab rat composing a symphony. In this study, we embark on a journey to uncover the enigmatic link between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania – a correlation as unexpected as discovering a caffeine addict in a decaf-only establishment!
Our investigation into this seemingly unrelated pair of variables was sparked by a serendipitous encounter at a research conference, where an economist and a psychiatrist walked into a statistical analysis seminar. The ensuing conversation led to an exchange of data, and our exploration began in earnest. After all, what better way to demonstrate the synergy between seemingly disparate fields than to uncover a correlation coefficient as surprising as finding a brain teaser in a medical journal!
Before delving into the empirical evidence, it is essential to appreciate the significance of our inquiry. By connecting the labor market dynamics in Minnesota with the energy consumption patterns in Romania, we not only challenge conventional wisdom but also bring to light the unforeseen intersections of human activity. It's as if the psychiatric aides are whispering words of encouragement to the jet fuel, giving it the much-needed boost to soar to new heights – not unlike an unexpected punchline brightening up a statistics symposium!
In conducting our analysis, we employed rigorous methodologies to ensure the robustness of our findings. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we subjected the variables to rigorous statistical scrutiny, using tools that were as precise as a calibrated scalpel in the hands of a skilled surgeon. And just like a well-timed punchline, our results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018 – a statistical achievement as remarkable as discovering a hidden treasure in a complex data set!
As we unveil the findings of our investigation, it is important to remember that, much like a well-crafted joke, scientific discoveries often defy expectations and challenge preconceived notions. This study serves as a reminder that the essence of great research lies in the ability to embrace the unexpected, to seek correlations where none may seem apparent. After all, who would have thought that the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the jet fuel consumed in Romania would exhibit such a compelling relationship—an unexpected duo worthy of the spotlight in the scientific hall of fame!


[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation of 0.8888515 between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the consumption of jet fuel in Romania from 2003 to 2018. This correlation coefficient is as robust as the caffeine content in a double shot espresso – it's a jolt of statistical power that leaves no room for decaffeinated doubt!
Our findings further showcased an r-squared value of 0.7900569, emphasizing the strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota whispered words of encouragement to the jet fuel, propelling it to new heights of energy consumption – a dynamic duo as unexpected as finding a chemistry joke in an economics textbook!
The significance level of p < 0.01 cemented the credibility of our results, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance. This level of significance is as rare as spotting a unicorn in a laboratory – a statistical marvel that demands attention and further exploration.
Moreover, our research team constructed a scatterplot (Fig. 1) to visually illustrate the compelling relationship between the number of psychiatric aides and jet fuel consumption. The scatterplot showcases the data points aligning in a manner as harmonious as a perfectly timed punchline, reinforcing the strength of the correlation we uncovered. It's the kind of visual representation that would make even a skeptic crack a smile and nod in agreement – a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis.
In summary, our empirical investigation into the connection between psychiatric aides in Minnesota and jet fuel usage in Romania has yielded results that challenge conventional wisdom and underscore the enigmatic nature of statistical relationships. This correlation, akin to finding humor in unexpected places, serves as a reminder that scientific inquiry often leads us down unexpected paths, where even the most unlikely variables can reveal meaningful connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our research has illuminated a correlation as unlikely as finding a jet engine at a psychiatric convention. The robust correlation coefficient between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the utilization of jet fuel in Romania from 2003 to 2018 (r = 0.8888515) is as remarkable as finding a statistical gem in a trove of data. This relationship is so strong; it's as if the psychiatric aides are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy—talk about jet-setting psychology!

Our results, supported by a significance level of p < 0.01, are as solid as a well-constructed experiment, leaving little room for doubt. It's the kind of significance that's as rare as a controlled double-blind study on Bigfoot. The visual representation of our findings in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) is as visually appealing as a well-crafted graphing joke – a testament to the unexpected harmony between these seemingly disparate variables.

Like an unexpected pun at a research conference, our study challenges preconceived notions and underscores the unpredictable nature of statistical relationships. These findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables and serve as a reminder that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights.

In conclusion, our research has demonstrated the unexpected synergy between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, akin to finding humor in unexpected places. Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed to confirm the quirky connection – it’s as clear as a neurologist’s handwriting on a prescription pad!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Neurological Novelties


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cognitive Aerodynamics and Mental Performance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mind Fuel: Exploring the Psychiatric Aides and Jet Fuel Connection with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota and the usage of jet fuel in Romania, shedding light on a correlation that might seem as unlikely as finding a stethoscope at an airport. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8888515 and a significance level of p < 0.01 from 2003 to 2018. It's as if the psychiatric aides in Minnesota are providing the jet fuel in Romania with some much-needed therapy! Our findings prompt a reevaluation of the connections between seemingly unrelated variables, reminding us that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can fuel new insights - much like finding a pilot's favorite joke in the lab report!

ChatGPT:

psychiatric aides, jet fuel, Minnesota, Romania, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, surprising correlation coefficient, significance level, reevaluation of connections, unexpected pairings, insights

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of psychiatric aides in Minnesota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota

Jet fuel used in Romania
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Romania in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Romania

Correlation r = 0.8888515 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7900569 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Romania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-6. 0.0000041690791967074500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.00042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 239,861 random variables You don't actually need 239 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota (Psychiatric Aides)150150210140430380390190180190510480900840900430
Jet fuel used in Romania (Million Barrels/Day)2.476772.992.389863.150273.497893.8353.041643.280633.410993.033333.063373.86723566.3443.62825




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([150,150,210,140,430,380,390,190,180,190,510,480,900,840,900,430,])
array_2 = np.array([2.47677,2.99,2.38986,3.15027,3.49789,3.835,3.04164,3.28063,3.41099,3.03333,3.06337,3.86723,5,6,6.344,3.62825,])
array_1_name = "The number of psychiatric aides in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Romania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2574 · Black Variable ID: 9982 · Red Variable ID: 24838
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0