about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,598 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and the second variable is Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO soybeans in Indiana grew larger and more robust, their sheer mass and volume exerted a gravitational pull on the Earth, subtly affecting the Earth's rotation. This unexpected change in the Earth's rotation altered the ocean currents, creating a domino effect that ultimately led to an increase in petroleum consumption in French Polynesia. After all, who knew that the humble soybean could have such cosmically chaotic consequences!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In the middle of a vast and vibrant soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans extend into the distance, their luscious green leaves swaying gently in the wind. As the pods emit a faint gas, the clear blue skies of the beautiful islands of French Polynesia are filled with this unique gas, blending with the air to create a colorful biofuel. In the background, petroleum-fueled vehicles can be seen navigating the roads of French Polynesia, emphasizing the unexpected connection between the GMO soybeans in Indiana and the petroleum consumption on the islands. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Magic realism Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia, in the following situation: As the soybeans in Indiana became more genetically modified, they inadvertently started producing a gas that, when combined with the air in French Polynesia, created a unique blend of biofuel, leading to a surge in demand for petroleum. This new biofuel blend was so in demand, even the islands couldn't resist the soy-powered wave. We could say the soybeans really fueled a global connection!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast soybean field in Indiana, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretched into the distance. Their vibrant green leaves waved in the wind as a faint gas was emitted from their pods. Meanwhile, on the beautiful islands of French Polynesia, the clear blue skies were filled with this unique gas, mixing with the air to create a colorful blend of biofuel. As the demand for this new biofuel surged, the sight of petroleum-fueled vehicles became increasingly common on the island roads, marking the unexpected connection between the GMO soybeans in Indiana and the petroleum consumption in French Polynesia.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a vast soybean field in Indiana, rows of genetically modified soybeans stretched into the distance. Their vibrant green leaves waved in the wind as a faint gas was emitted from their pods. Meanwhile, on the beautiful islands of French Polynesia, the clear blue skies were filled with this unique gas, mixing with the air to create a colorful blend of biofuel. As the demand for this new biofuel surged, the sight of petroleum-fueled vehicles became increasingly common on the island roads, marking the unexpected connection between the GMO soybeans in Indiana and the petroleum consumption in French Polynesia. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: In the middle of a vast and vibrant soybean field, rows of genetically modified soybeans extend into the distance, their luscious green leaves swaying gently in the wind. As the pods emit a faint gas, the clear blue skies of the beautiful islands of French Polynesia are filled with this unique gas, blending with the air to create a colorful biofuel. In the background, petroleum-fueled vehicles can be seen navigating the roads of French Polynesia, emphasizing the unexpected connection between the GMO soybeans in Indiana and the petroleum consumption on the islands.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Indiana caused Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

The Journal of Agricultural Innovations and Global Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9268424 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The global interconnectedness of various economic and agricultural systems has long been a subject of fascination and investigation. As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in a web of data, seeking to unravel the complex relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena. In this study, we dive into the intriguing and somewhat enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the idyllic landscapes of French Polynesia.

While on the surface, soybeans and petroleum may appear to have as much in common as a fox and a henhouse, our analysis uncovers a correlation that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in surprise. Our exploration takes us on a journey that spans vast distances and delves into the intricate tapestry of global trade and consumption patterns, revealing unexpected threads of connection between agricultural biotechnology and energy utilization.

The title of our paper, "The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show," is not merely a tongue-twister designed to amuse linguists but encapsulates the essence of our inquiry. We aim to shed light on a phenomenon that is as mysterious as it is compelling, and our findings promise to intrigue, entertain, and perhaps even raise a chuckle from the academically-inclined reader. After all, who could resist the allure of a study that unites the heartland of America with the islands of the South Pacific, all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry?

As we embark on this exploration, it is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of global agro-economic dynamics but also serve as a delightful romp through the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. So, buckle up and join us on this whimsical journey as we unveil the surprising correlation between soybeans and petroleum, proving once and for all that in the world of economics and agriculture, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The global interconnectedness of various economic and agricultural systems has long been a subject of fascination and investigation. As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in a web of data, seeking to unravel the complex relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena. In this study, we dive into the intriguing and somewhat enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the idyllic landscapes of French Polynesia.
While on the surface, soybeans and petroleum may appear to have as much in common as a fox and a henhouse, our analysis uncovers a correlation that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in surprise. Our exploration takes us on a journey that spans vast distances and delves into the intricate tapestry of global trade and consumption patterns, revealing unexpected threads of connection between agricultural biotechnology and energy utilization.
The title of our paper, "The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show," is not merely a tongue-twister designed to amuse linguists but encapsulates the essence of our inquiry. We aim to shed light on a phenomenon that is as mysterious as it is compelling, and our findings promise to intrigue, entertain, and perhaps even raise a chuckle from the academically-inclined reader. After all, who could resist the allure of a study that unites the heartland of America with the islands of the South Pacific, all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry?
As we embark on this exploration, it is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of global agro-economic dynamics but also serve as a delightful romp through the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. So, buckle up and join us on this whimsical journey as we unveil the surprising correlation between soybeans and petroleum, proving once and for all that in the world of economics and agriculture, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of GMO soybean cultivation in the Midwest region of the United States. Their findings highlighted the benefits of genetically modified soybeans in increasing yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the trends in petroleum consumption in various Pacific islands, including French Polynesia, attributing the fluctuations to global oil prices and regional economic development.

Expanding the scope to include broader perspectives, "The Economics of Agriculture: Essays on Land, Water, and Energy" by Brown et al. (2017) offers insights into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and energy usage. Similarly, "Energy Economics and Policy" by Miller and Smith (2016) delves into the complexities of energy markets, shedding light on the factors influencing petroleum consumption across diverse geographical locations.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Next" presents a fictionalized account of biotechnology and its potential ramifications on global ecosystems. Furthermore, Margaret Atwood's speculative fiction masterpiece "Oryx and Crake" explores the ethical dilemmas surrounding genetic engineering and its implications for society. While these literary works may seem far removed from empirical research, they underscore the pervasive influence of biotechnology on the collective imagination.

In the age of social media, it is not uncommon to encounter intriguing anecdotes and musings on seemingly incongruous topics. A tweet by @AgroEcoEnigma posited an unconventional hypothesis linking soybean genetics to the geopolitics of petroleum, prompting us to consider the whimsical nature of scholarly inquiry.

As we navigate the labyrinth of literature, it becomes evident that the correlation between GMO soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, defying expectations and eliciting a sense of wonder. The interconnectedness of these disparate domains beckons us to embark on an intellectual escapade that promises both enlightenment and amusement, demonstrating the delightful unpredictability of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The global interconnectedness of various economic and agricultural systems has long been a subject of fascination and investigation. As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in a web of data, seeking to unravel the complex relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena. In this study, we dive into the intriguing and somewhat enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the idyllic landscapes of French Polynesia.
While on the surface, soybeans and petroleum may appear to have as much in common as a fox and a henhouse, our analysis uncovers a correlation that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in surprise. Our exploration takes us on a journey that spans vast distances and delves into the intricate tapestry of global trade and consumption patterns, revealing unexpected threads of connection between agricultural biotechnology and energy utilization.
The title of our paper, "The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show," is not merely a tongue-twister designed to amuse linguists but encapsulates the essence of our inquiry. We aim to shed light on a phenomenon that is as mysterious as it is compelling, and our findings promise to intrigue, entertain, and perhaps even raise a chuckle from the academically-inclined reader. After all, who could resist the allure of a study that unites the heartland of America with the islands of the South Pacific, all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry?
As we embark on this exploration, it is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of global agro-economic dynamics but also serve as a delightful romp through the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. So, buckle up and join us on this whimsical journey as we unveil the surprising correlation between soybeans and petroleum, proving once and for all that in the world of economics and agriculture, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, our research team delved into a series of data exploration and analysis maneuvers that would make even the most stoic of researchers crack a smile. Our approach combined elements of statistical analysis, econometric modeling, and a dash of whimsical curiosity to shed light on this unexpected correlation.

Data Collection:

We scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through virtual fields and cyber-oceans, to procure relevant data covering the period from 2000 to 2021. Our primary sources of information were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), where we gleaned an abundance of numerical treasures to fuel our quest for correlation.

Statistical Analysis:

Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, we meticulously examined the datasets, running regressions, and conducting tests with the enthusiasm of a botanist discovering a new species of soybean. Our analysis embraced the wondrous world of correlation coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals, offering insights into the degree and significance of the observed relationship between GMO soybean usage and petroleum consumption.

Econometric Modeling:

With a fervent nod to the traditions of economic analysis, we employed econometric models to capture the intricate dance between soybean genetics and Polynesian petroleum preferences. Our models were refined with the precision of a French pastry chef crafting a delicate dessert, allowing us to untangle the complexity of variables and uncover the underlying patterns shaping the soy-petro connection.

Sensitivity Analysis:

No voyage of scientific discovery would be complete without a touch of uncertainty, so we subjected our findings to a battery of sensitivity analyses. These exercises tested the robustness of our results to various modifications and perturbations, ensuring that our conclusions remained as resilient as a soybean plant swaying in the Midwestern breeze.

So, with a blend of analytical rigor, imaginative wanderings, and the occasional whimsical flourish, our methodology served as the compass guiding us through the uncharted territory of agricultural biotechnology and energy interconnections. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this scientific escapade as we unravel the thread that ties GMO soybeans to Polynesian petrol, proving once more that in the world of scholarly inquiry, truth is often the best punchline.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9268424, r-squared of 0.8590369, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The global interconnectedness of various economic and agricultural systems has long been a subject of fascination and investigation. As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in a web of data, seeking to unravel the complex relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena. In this study, we dive into the intriguing and somewhat enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the idyllic landscapes of French Polynesia.
While on the surface, soybeans and petroleum may appear to have as much in common as a fox and a henhouse, our analysis uncovers a correlation that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in surprise. Our exploration takes us on a journey that spans vast distances and delves into the intricate tapestry of global trade and consumption patterns, revealing unexpected threads of connection between agricultural biotechnology and energy utilization.
The title of our paper, "The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show," is not merely a tongue-twister designed to amuse linguists but encapsulates the essence of our inquiry. We aim to shed light on a phenomenon that is as mysterious as it is compelling, and our findings promise to intrigue, entertain, and perhaps even raise a chuckle from the academically-inclined reader. After all, who could resist the allure of a study that unites the heartland of America with the islands of the South Pacific, all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry?
As we embark on this exploration, it is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of global agro-economic dynamics but also serve as a delightful romp through the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. So, buckle up and join us on this whimsical journey as we unveil the surprising correlation between soybeans and petroleum, proving once and for all that in the world of economics and agriculture, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The quantitative analysis of the data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9268424 indicated a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana increased, petroleum consumption in French Polynesia also exhibited a corresponding rise.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8590369 further emphasized the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 85.9% of the variability in petroleum consumption in French Polynesia could be explained by the variation in the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana. The significance level of the correlation was striking, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the statistical strength of this unanticipated relationship.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually presents this striking correlation, illustrating a clear and convincing pattern of co-movement between the two variables. The figure encapsulates the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated agricultural and energy dynamics, prompting both curiosity and admiration for the quirky nature of global economic interdependencies.

These compelling results not only attest to the unexpected association between soybean GMO usage and Polynesian petroleum consumption but also highlight the need for further exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unorthodox relationship. As we confront the amusing reality of soybeans and petroleum partaking in a global pas de deux, it becomes evident that the world of economic and agricultural phenomena is rife with delightful surprises, waiting to be uncovered by the discerning eye of the inquisitive researcher.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive study on the impact of GMO soybean cultivation in the Midwest region of the United States. Their findings highlighted the benefits of genetically modified soybeans in increasing yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) examined the trends in petroleum consumption in various Pacific islands, including French Polynesia, attributing the fluctuations to global oil prices and regional economic development.
Expanding the scope to include broader perspectives, "The Economics of Agriculture: Essays on Land, Water, and Energy" by Brown et al. (2017) offers insights into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and energy usage. Similarly, "Energy Economics and Policy" by Miller and Smith (2016) delves into the complexities of energy markets, shedding light on the factors influencing petroleum consumption across diverse geographical locations.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Next" presents a fictionalized account of biotechnology and its potential ramifications on global ecosystems. Furthermore, Margaret Atwood's speculative fiction masterpiece "Oryx and Crake" explores the ethical dilemmas surrounding genetic engineering and its implications for society. While these literary works may seem far removed from empirical research, they underscore the pervasive influence of biotechnology on the collective imagination.
In the age of social media, it is not uncommon to encounter intriguing anecdotes and musings on seemingly incongruous topics. A tweet by @AgroEcoEnigma posited an unconventional hypothesis linking soybean genetics to the geopolitics of petroleum, prompting us to consider the whimsical nature of scholarly inquiry.
As we navigate the labyrinth of literature, it becomes evident that the correlation between GMO soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries, defying expectations and eliciting a sense of wonder. The interconnectedness of these disparate domains beckons us to embark on an intellectual escapade that promises both enlightenment and amusement, demonstrating the delightful unpredictability of scholarly exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis of the data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9268424 indicated a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana increased, petroleum consumption in French Polynesia also exhibited a corresponding rise.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8590369 further emphasized the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 85.9% of the variability in petroleum consumption in French Polynesia could be explained by the variation in the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana. The significance level of the correlation was striking, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the statistical strength of this unanticipated relationship.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually presents this striking correlation, illustrating a clear and convincing pattern of co-movement between the two variables. The figure encapsulates the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated agricultural and energy dynamics, prompting both curiosity and admiration for the quirky nature of global economic interdependencies.
These compelling results not only attest to the unexpected association between soybean GMO usage and Polynesian petroleum consumption but also highlight the need for further exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unorthodox relationship. As we confront the amusing reality of soybeans and petroleum partaking in a global pas de deux, it becomes evident that the world of economic and agricultural phenomena is rife with delightful surprises, waiting to be uncovered by the discerning eye of the inquisitive researcher.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only confirm but also amplify the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the ethereal landscapes of French Polynesia. At first glance, this connection may appear as enigmatic as a Polynesian riddle, but our rigorous analysis leaves little room for doubt regarding its existence.

Drawing from the literature review, the whimsical hypothesis posed by @AgroEcoEnigma on Twitter emerges as an intriguing catalyst for our investigation. While social media musings are often met with skepticism in academic circles, this unconventional suggestion captured both our attention and our imagination. Smith et al.'s emphasis on the benefits of GMO soybeans aligns with our findings, demonstrating that the influence of biotechnology reaches far beyond the boundaries of agricultural fields, quite literally in this case.

As we confront the delightful reality of soybeans and petroleum engaging in an unexpected tango across continents, it becomes apparent that the intricate interplay between these seemingly incongruous commodities holds a captivating allure. Just as Margaret Atwood's literary exploration delves into the ethical dilemmas of genetic engineering, our research has resolutely unveiled the whimsical interconnectedness of agricultural biotechnology and global energy dynamics.

The statistically robust correlation coefficient and the compelling scatterplot in Figure 1 not only point to a tangible association but also beckon us to embrace the unpredictability of economic interdependencies with bemused fondness. At the heart of this seemingly curious correlation lies a truth as whimsical as a French farce – the world of economic and agricultural phenomena is replete with delightful surprises, where soybeans and petroleum elegantly waltz to a synchronous cadence, leaving us awe-struck yet undeniably entertained.

In the spirit of scholarly inquiry, our research represents a humble attempt to decipher the captivating complexity of global interconnections, reminding us that within the labyrinth of empirical data and statistical analyses, there exists a realm of enchanting peculiarity waiting to be unfurled by the discerning gaze of the inquisitive scholar.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Indiana and Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.

Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The global interconnectedness of various economic and agricultural systems has long been a subject of fascination and investigation. As researchers, we often find ourselves entangled in a web of data, seeking to unravel the complex relationships between seemingly disparate phenomena. In this study, we dive into the intriguing and somewhat enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified soybeans in the heartland of America and the consumption of petroleum in the idyllic landscapes of French Polynesia.
While on the surface, soybeans and petroleum may appear to have as much in common as a fox and a henhouse, our analysis uncovers a correlation that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow in surprise. Our exploration takes us on a journey that spans vast distances and delves into the intricate tapestry of global trade and consumption patterns, revealing unexpected threads of connection between agricultural biotechnology and energy utilization.
The title of our paper, "The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show," is not merely a tongue-twister designed to amuse linguists but encapsulates the essence of our inquiry. We aim to shed light on a phenomenon that is as mysterious as it is compelling, and our findings promise to intrigue, entertain, and perhaps even raise a chuckle from the academically-inclined reader. After all, who could resist the allure of a study that unites the heartland of America with the islands of the South Pacific, all in the pursuit of scientific inquiry?
As we embark on this exploration, it is our hope that this research will not only contribute to the scholarly understanding of global agro-economic dynamics but also serve as a delightful romp through the unexpected connections that underpin our modern world. So, buckle up and join us on this whimsical journey as we unveil the surprising correlation between soybeans and petroleum, proving once and for all that in the world of economics and agriculture, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis of the data collected from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration revealed a remarkable correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9268424 indicated a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana increased, petroleum consumption in French Polynesia also exhibited a corresponding rise.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8590369 further emphasized the robustness of this association, indicating that approximately 85.9% of the variability in petroleum consumption in French Polynesia could be explained by the variation in the use of GMO soybeans in Indiana. The significance level of the correlation was striking, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the statistical strength of this unanticipated relationship.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually presents this striking correlation, illustrating a clear and convincing pattern of co-movement between the two variables. The figure encapsulates the surprising interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated agricultural and energy dynamics, prompting both curiosity and admiration for the quirky nature of global economic interdependencies.
These compelling results not only attest to the unexpected association between soybean GMO usage and Polynesian petroleum consumption but also highlight the need for further exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this unorthodox relationship. As we confront the amusing reality of soybeans and petroleum partaking in a global pas de deux, it becomes evident that the world of economic and agricultural phenomena is rife with delightful surprises, waiting to be uncovered by the discerning eye of the inquisitive researcher.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia has revealed a truly remarkable connection. The statistical analysis has not only demonstrated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables but has also highlighted the whimsical nature of global economic interdependencies.

The findings of our study prompt contemplation on the idiosyncrasies of international trade and consumption patterns, serving as a charming reminder that the world of economics and agriculture is indeed a place where the unexpected can, and does, happen. It's a bit like stumbling upon a cow at a petrol station - surprising, perhaps even amusing, but ultimately indicative of the inexplicable connections that underpin our modern globalized society.

As we wrap up this curious exploration, it's worth noting that the correlation coefficient of 0.9268424 may just be the unexpected hero of this tale, linking the heartland of America with the picturesque landscapes of French Polynesia in a manner that would make even the most stoic economist smirk with amusement.

In light of these findings, it is our resolute assertion that no further research is needed in this realm of inquiry. After all, once you've uncovered a correlation as delightfully absurd as the one between GMO soybeans and Polynesian petroleum consumption, there's little more to say - except, perhaps, to marvel at the unpredictable dance of global economic forces and to acknowledge that truth really can be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Innovations and Global Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture and Biotechnology Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Soybean GMO Flow and the Polynesian Petro Price Show with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified soybeans in Indiana and petroleum consumption in French Polynesia, with the aim of shedding light on a surprisingly interconnected global phenomenon. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, our research team sought to unravel the perplexing link between agricultural biotechnology in one part of the world and energy consumption in another.
Upon deep analysis, an unexpected correlation emerged, with a coefficient of 0.9268424 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. The findings of this study suggest a striking association between the two seemingly disparate realms, raising intriguing questions and prompting further investigation into the intricate and often whimsical web of global interdependencies.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified soybeans, Indiana, petroleum consumption, French Polynesia, global phenomenon, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, agricultural biotechnology, energy consumption, correlation analysis, global interdependencies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Indiana that are genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Indiana

Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia
Detailed data title: Volume of petroluem consumption consumed in French Polynesia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia

Correlation r = 0.9268424 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8590369 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Indiana) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.8E-10. 0.0000000005846036081991783000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 5.8E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,710,560,773 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in soybeans in Indiana (GMO soybeans %)63788388878992949694959693909293929291939391
Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia (Million Barrels/Day)5.246645.856726.1056.544376.3836.684616.492366.854917.010926.991936.995786.725946.531646.629536.482716.784576.671436.497726.694026.694026.344146.55112




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([63,78,83,88,87,89,92,94,96,94,95,96,93,90,92,93,92,92,91,93,93,91,])
array_2 = np.array([5.24664,5.85672,6.105,6.54437,6.383,6.68461,6.49236,6.85491,7.01092,6.99193,6.99578,6.72594,6.53164,6.62953,6.48271,6.78457,6.67143,6.49772,6.69402,6.69402,6.34414,6.55112,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Petroluem consumption in French Polynesia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2598 · Black Variable ID: 815 · Red Variable ID: 24429
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0