about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,899 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the second variable is The number of professional painters in Kentucky.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences decreased, so did the availability of professional painters in Kentucky. This is due to the little-known but undeniable fact that as Master's degree holders in Physical sciences waned, they took with them the secrets of the most advanced paint formulations. Without this crucial knowledge, professional painters in Kentucky found themselves unable to create the perfect hues and finishes, leading to a statewide shortage of impeccably painted surfaces. Who would have thought that the intricacies of quantum physics and the art of painting were inexplicably intertwined in the rolling hills of Kentucky?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene countryside scene in a sunny Kentucky town. In front of an old barn-turned-art-studio, a group of freshly graduated Master's degree holders in Physical sciences joyfully put away their lab coats and don colorful overalls. They are warmly welcomed by professional painters in Kentucky, with paintbrushes in hand, ready to master the canvas together. The scene is depicted in a Celtic art style, with intricate patterns and stylized elements inspired by Celtic designs. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Photorealism A scene from Skyrim a funny image you would see on reddit Celtic art
ChatGPT: Celtic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky, in the following situation: As the number of Master's degrees in Physical sciences increased, so did the number of professional painters in Kentucky. It turns out, all those physics and chemistry grads decided they'd rather be "masters of the canvas" than "masters of the universe." They traded in their lab coats for overalls and started creating "matter" masterpieces instead of conducting "matter" experiments.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny Kentucky town, a group of freshly graduated Master's degree holders in Physical sciences are seen joyfully putting away their lab coats and donning colorful overalls. They stand in front of an old barn-turned-art-studio, surrounded by a picturesque landscape. The professional painters in Kentucky, with their paintbrushes in hand, warmly welcome the new arrivals to their artistic community, all ready to master the canvas together.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Celtic art ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny Kentucky town, a group of freshly graduated Master's degree holders in Physical sciences are seen joyfully putting away their lab coats and donning colorful overalls. They stand in front of an old barn-turned-art-studio, surrounded by a picturesque landscape. The professional painters in Kentucky, with their paintbrushes in hand, warmly welcome the new arrivals to their artistic community, all ready to master the canvas together. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene countryside scene in a sunny Kentucky town. In front of an old barn-turned-art-studio, a group of freshly graduated Master's degree holders in Physical sciences joyfully put away their lab coats and don colorful overalls. They are warmly welcomed by professional painters in Kentucky, with paintbrushes in hand, ready to master the canvas together. The scene is depicted in a Celtic art style, with intricate patterns and stylized elements inspired by Celtic designs.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences caused The number of professional painters in Kentucky to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Artistic Endeavors

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The intersection of academic pursuits and artistic endeavors has long fascinated scholars, prompting us to delve deeper into the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the burgeoning community of professional painters in the picturesque state of Kentucky. As we embark on this research journey, we cannot help but marvel at the curious confluence of intellectual rigor and creative expression, akin to a scientist mixing elements in a laboratory to concoct a wondrous potion of artistry and innovation.

While most would assume that master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving trade of professional painters are as unrelated as a fish and a bicycle, our study unearthed a surprising kinship between these seemingly disparate domains. We were motivated by a desire to unravel this enigmatic relationship, fueled by the belief that there is more to the canvas of academia and the palette of artistic talent than meets the eye.

In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, we pored over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously scrutinizing numbers and trends to discern patterns that transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. What we uncovered was nothing short of a masterpiece in statistical intrigue – a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603, which left us marveling at the near-perfect alignment of academic achievement in physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the Bluegrass State. It seems that in the realm of academic excellence, as in art, the strokes of correlation can indeed create a masterpiece of unexpected coherence.

This study seeks to chip away at the stony facade of academic orthodoxy and reveal the vibrant colors beneath, illustrating the captivating dance between scholarly pursuits and the artistry that flourishes in the rolling hills of Kentucky. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and analysis, we invite you to join us in this revelatory exploration, where equations and pigments intertwine in a captivating waltz of intellect and ingenuity.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your berets, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to illuminate the wondrous interplay between academia and the arts, where the brushstrokes of scientific inquiry mingle with the hues of artistic expression in a stunning tableau of unexpected harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of academic pursuits and artistic endeavors has long fascinated scholars, prompting us to delve deeper into the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the burgeoning community of professional painters in the picturesque state of Kentucky. As we embark on this research journey, we cannot help but marvel at the curious confluence of intellectual rigor and creative expression, akin to a scientist mixing elements in a laboratory to concoct a wondrous potion of artistry and innovation.
While most would assume that master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving trade of professional painters are as unrelated as a fish and a bicycle, our study unearthed a surprising kinship between these seemingly disparate domains. We were motivated by a desire to unravel this enigmatic relationship, fueled by the belief that there is more to the canvas of academia and the palette of artistic talent than meets the eye.
In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, we pored over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously scrutinizing numbers and trends to discern patterns that transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. What we uncovered was nothing short of a masterpiece in statistical intrigue – a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603, which left us marveling at the near-perfect alignment of academic achievement in physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the Bluegrass State. It seems that in the realm of academic excellence, as in art, the strokes of correlation can indeed create a masterpiece of unexpected coherence.
This study seeks to chip away at the stony facade of academic orthodoxy and reveal the vibrant colors beneath, illustrating the captivating dance between scholarly pursuits and the artistry that flourishes in the rolling hills of Kentucky. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and analysis, we invite you to join us in this revelatory exploration, where equations and pigments intertwine in a captivating waltz of intellect and ingenuity.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your berets, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to illuminate the wondrous interplay between academia and the arts, where the brushstrokes of scientific inquiry mingle with the hues of artistic expression in a stunning tableau of unexpected harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
LITERATURE REVIEW

The correlation between academic achievements in the physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the state of Kentucky has intrigued scholars for decades, leading to a myriad of studies seeking to shed light on this unlikely kinship. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of educational attainment and artistic occupations, emphasizing the role of cross-disciplinary influences in shaping career trajectories. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the nuanced interconnections between scientific learning and creative expression, presenting a compelling argument for the symbiotic relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. Jones (2019) further explored this phenomenon, examining the societal impact of academic pursuits and artistic vocations, uncovering illuminating patterns that underscore the fascinating interplay between knowledge acquisition and aesthetic craftsmanship.

In "Artful Chemistry: Exploring the Alchemy of Science and Painting," the authors illuminate the curious parallels between the formulation of scientific hypotheses and the intricacies of mixing vibrant pigments on a canvas, inviting readers to ponder the artistry inherent in experimentation and discovery (Rosen & Davidson, 2017). Similarly, "The Physics of Paint: Unraveling the Mysteries of Color" delves into the wavelength properties of light and the chemical composition of pigments, offering a compelling synthesis of scientific principles and artistic applications (Johnson, 2016).

On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "The Artist's Equation" by Emily Greene and "The Quantum Canvas" by Michael Harper playfully blur the boundaries between scientific exploration and creative inspiration, weaving compelling narratives of scientists-turned-painters and artists-turned-physicists, challenging the conventional delineation of intellectual pursuits.

Furthermore, the animated series "The Magic School Bus" and the children's show "Bill Nye the Science Guy" provide captivating illustrations of the enchanting fusion of scientific inquiry and artistic expression, igniting the imaginations of young viewers and reinforcing the idea that the worlds of science and art are not as divergent as they may initially appear.

As we navigate through this colorful tapestry of literature, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of academic excellence in the physical sciences and the realm of professional painters is far from a mere academic curiosity. Rather, it presents a vibrant canvas of interconnectedness, where the brushstrokes of knowledge blend seamlessly with the palette of creativity, creating a tableau of unexpected harmony that stands as a testament to the boundless interplay between intellect and imagination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of academic pursuits and artistic endeavors has long fascinated scholars, prompting us to delve deeper into the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the burgeoning community of professional painters in the picturesque state of Kentucky. As we embark on this research journey, we cannot help but marvel at the curious confluence of intellectual rigor and creative expression, akin to a scientist mixing elements in a laboratory to concoct a wondrous potion of artistry and innovation.
While most would assume that master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving trade of professional painters are as unrelated as a fish and a bicycle, our study unearthed a surprising kinship between these seemingly disparate domains. We were motivated by a desire to unravel this enigmatic relationship, fueled by the belief that there is more to the canvas of academia and the palette of artistic talent than meets the eye.
In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, we pored over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously scrutinizing numbers and trends to discern patterns that transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. What we uncovered was nothing short of a masterpiece in statistical intrigue – a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603, which left us marveling at the near-perfect alignment of academic achievement in physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the Bluegrass State. It seems that in the realm of academic excellence, as in art, the strokes of correlation can indeed create a masterpiece of unexpected coherence.
This study seeks to chip away at the stony facade of academic orthodoxy and reveal the vibrant colors beneath, illustrating the captivating dance between scholarly pursuits and the artistry that flourishes in the rolling hills of Kentucky. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and analysis, we invite you to join us in this revelatory exploration, where equations and pigments intertwine in a captivating waltz of intellect and ingenuity.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your berets, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to illuminate the wondrous interplay between academia and the arts, where the brushstrokes of scientific inquiry mingle with the hues of artistic expression in a stunning tableau of unexpected harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the colorful web of connections between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving community of professional painters in Kentucky, our research team employed a mix of conventional statistical analyses and unconventional whimsy, much like a blend of chemical elements in a laboratory concoction. Our data collection process resembled a dance between the precision of scientific inquiry and the spontaneity of artistic creation, resulting in a methodology that is as eccentric as it is effective.

Data Collection:
The foundation of our research rested upon the sturdy pillars of data obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These sources provided a rich tapestry of information spanning the years 2012 to 2021, allowing us to delve into the depths of time and paint a comprehensive picture of the academic and artistic landscapes. We traversed these digital realms with the agility of a ballet dancer, gracefully selecting datasets and statistics that would serve as our canvas for exploration.

Quantitative Analysis:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, we set out to unravel the knots of correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the influx of professional painters in the rolling hills and vibrant cities of Kentucky. Much like a virtuoso artist brandishing a palette knife, we applied correlation coefficients, regression analyses, and t-tests with precision and flair. Our goal was to not only uncover correlations but also to infuse our findings with the vivacious spirit of discovery, injecting a touch of artistic finesse into the traditionally stoic realm of statistical analysis.

Qualitative Interpretation:
In addition to the quantitative gymnastics, we delved into the qualitative nuances of the data, exploring the narratives and stories that lurked behind the numerical facades. Much like a sleuth unraveling a mystery, we sought to understand the human elements that underpin the correlations, from the aspirations of academic scholars to the dreams of aspiring painters. This qualitative exploration added depth and richness to our findings, casting a spotlight on the personal journeys that intersected within the broader trends.

Artistic License:
As a nod to the artistic flair that permeates our study, we embraced a certain degree of "artistic license" in our approach to analysis and interpretation. We allowed our imaginations to run wild, sprinkling a dash of whimsy and creativity into our data processing, akin to the vibrant splatters of paint on a blank canvas. This unconventional twist infused our methodology with a sense of playfulness, reminding us that even in the rigidity of scientific research, there is room for spontaneity and expression.

Ultimately, our methodology was a blend of rigor and exuberance, a harmonious symphony of numbers and narratives, and a testament to the delightful marriage of academic inquiry and artistic exploration. As we present our findings, we invite readers to immerse themselves in the whimsical journey that led us to unravel the intricate threads connecting Master's degrees in physical sciences and the flourishing community of professional painters in the Bluegrass State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9793603, r-squared of 0.9591466, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection of academic pursuits and artistic endeavors has long fascinated scholars, prompting us to delve deeper into the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the burgeoning community of professional painters in the picturesque state of Kentucky. As we embark on this research journey, we cannot help but marvel at the curious confluence of intellectual rigor and creative expression, akin to a scientist mixing elements in a laboratory to concoct a wondrous potion of artistry and innovation.
While most would assume that master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving trade of professional painters are as unrelated as a fish and a bicycle, our study unearthed a surprising kinship between these seemingly disparate domains. We were motivated by a desire to unravel this enigmatic relationship, fueled by the belief that there is more to the canvas of academia and the palette of artistic talent than meets the eye.
In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, we pored over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously scrutinizing numbers and trends to discern patterns that transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. What we uncovered was nothing short of a masterpiece in statistical intrigue – a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603, which left us marveling at the near-perfect alignment of academic achievement in physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the Bluegrass State. It seems that in the realm of academic excellence, as in art, the strokes of correlation can indeed create a masterpiece of unexpected coherence.
This study seeks to chip away at the stony facade of academic orthodoxy and reveal the vibrant colors beneath, illustrating the captivating dance between scholarly pursuits and the artistry that flourishes in the rolling hills of Kentucky. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and analysis, we invite you to join us in this revelatory exploration, where equations and pigments intertwine in a captivating waltz of intellect and ingenuity.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your berets, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to illuminate the wondrous interplay between academia and the arts, where the brushstrokes of scientific inquiry mingle with the hues of artistic expression in a stunning tableau of unexpected harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of our data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in the state of Kentucky, from 2012 to 2021. This finding suggests a striking relationship between the pursuit of advanced education in the physical sciences and the cheerful proliferation of professional painters across the Bluegrass State.

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9591466 indicates that approximately 95.91% of the variation in the number of professional painters can be explained by the variation in the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences. In other words, the academic fervor in the physical sciences seems to be closely intertwined with the flourishing community of painters, as if each brushstroke of scientific discovery is mirrored by a brushstroke of artistic expression.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and lends statistical support to our findings. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is akin to stumbling upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – highly improbable, but undeniably delightful.

Our results are graphically depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in Kentucky. This visual representation vividly portrays the tight relationship between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt that the world of academia and the realm of art are engaged in a dance of unanticipated harmony.

In summation, our findings not only confirm the existence of a compelling link between academic achievements in the physical sciences and the artistic vibrancy of the painter community in Kentucky, but also serve to highlight the whimsical interconnectedness of disciplines that, at first glance, seem as different as chalk and cheese, or in this case, as different as a Bunsen burner and a paintbrush.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
LITERATURE REVIEW
The correlation between academic achievements in the physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the state of Kentucky has intrigued scholars for decades, leading to a myriad of studies seeking to shed light on this unlikely kinship. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of educational attainment and artistic occupations, emphasizing the role of cross-disciplinary influences in shaping career trajectories. Similarly, Doe (2018) delved into the nuanced interconnections between scientific learning and creative expression, presenting a compelling argument for the symbiotic relationship between these seemingly disparate realms. Jones (2019) further explored this phenomenon, examining the societal impact of academic pursuits and artistic vocations, uncovering illuminating patterns that underscore the fascinating interplay between knowledge acquisition and aesthetic craftsmanship.
In "Artful Chemistry: Exploring the Alchemy of Science and Painting," the authors illuminate the curious parallels between the formulation of scientific hypotheses and the intricacies of mixing vibrant pigments on a canvas, inviting readers to ponder the artistry inherent in experimentation and discovery (Rosen & Davidson, 2017). Similarly, "The Physics of Paint: Unraveling the Mysteries of Color" delves into the wavelength properties of light and the chemical composition of pigments, offering a compelling synthesis of scientific principles and artistic applications (Johnson, 2016).
On a more imaginative note, fictional works such as "The Artist's Equation" by Emily Greene and "The Quantum Canvas" by Michael Harper playfully blur the boundaries between scientific exploration and creative inspiration, weaving compelling narratives of scientists-turned-painters and artists-turned-physicists, challenging the conventional delineation of intellectual pursuits.
Furthermore, the animated series "The Magic School Bus" and the children's show "Bill Nye the Science Guy" provide captivating illustrations of the enchanting fusion of scientific inquiry and artistic expression, igniting the imaginations of young viewers and reinforcing the idea that the worlds of science and art are not as divergent as they may initially appear.
As we navigate through this colorful tapestry of literature, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of academic excellence in the physical sciences and the realm of professional painters is far from a mere academic curiosity. Rather, it presents a vibrant canvas of interconnectedness, where the brushstrokes of knowledge blend seamlessly with the palette of creativity, creating a tableau of unexpected harmony that stands as a testament to the boundless interplay between intellect and imagination.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in the state of Kentucky, from 2012 to 2021. This finding suggests a striking relationship between the pursuit of advanced education in the physical sciences and the cheerful proliferation of professional painters across the Bluegrass State.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9591466 indicates that approximately 95.91% of the variation in the number of professional painters can be explained by the variation in the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences. In other words, the academic fervor in the physical sciences seems to be closely intertwined with the flourishing community of painters, as if each brushstroke of scientific discovery is mirrored by a brushstroke of artistic expression.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and lends statistical support to our findings. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is akin to stumbling upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – highly improbable, but undeniably delightful.
Our results are graphically depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in Kentucky. This visual representation vividly portrays the tight relationship between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt that the world of academia and the realm of art are engaged in a dance of unanticipated harmony.
In summation, our findings not only confirm the existence of a compelling link between academic achievements in the physical sciences and the artistic vibrancy of the painter community in Kentucky, but also serve to highlight the whimsical interconnectedness of disciplines that, at first glance, seem as different as chalk and cheese, or in this case, as different as a Bunsen burner and a paintbrush.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling correlation uncovered in this study between the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in Kentucky from 2012 to 2021 aligns with the broader research landscape, where scientific inquiry and artistic expression intertwine like strands of DNA in a double helix. Our results not only affirm the findings of previous studies but also add a splash of color to the canvas of knowledge, reaffirming the delightful complexity of the relationship between academia and art.

Building upon the insightful work of Smith (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2019), our research strikes a chord with the idea that the pursuit of scientific mastery and the artistic endeavor are not two ships passing in the night, but rather ships gleefully doing synchronized swimming while humming a shared tune. The world of physical sciences and the domain of professional painting appear to engage in a delightful pas de deux, where each pirouette of academic achievement is echoed by a brushstroke of creative prowess. It's as if the periodic table and the color wheel have been conspiring in secret to create a symphony of intellectual and aesthetic harmony.

The robust correlation coefficient and the r-squared value obtained in our analysis serve as evidence that the number of professional painters in Kentucky can be substantially explained by the number of Master's degrees in the physical sciences. This statistical bedrock beneath our feet is as reassuring as finding a compass in a room full of magnetic personalities—resolute in its direction and unwavering in its implications.

The whimsical interconnectedness of academic excellence in the physical sciences and the expressive vitality of the painter community in Kentucky, captured so vividly in our results, unveils the playful dialogue between seemingly distinct domains. It's as if the laws of thermodynamics and the principles of color theory have been trading secrets in a clandestine rendezvous. This correlation paints a picture not only of scientific prowess but also of the kaleidoscopic nature of human endeavors, where scholarly pursuits and artistic expressions waltz in an enchanting, albeit unpredicted, harmony.

As we continue to peel back the layers of this curious relationship between academic accomplishments and the vibrant community of professional painters, let us remember that every data point is a brushstroke on the canvas of knowledge, depicting an interconnectedness that transcends disciplinary boundaries. Our findings, like a palette of colors waiting to be mixed, beckon researchers to explore the intricate symphony between academia and art, and to recognize that the quest for knowledge and the pursuit of creativity are but different verses of the same joyous melody. Our study serves as a delightful reminder that in the grand theater of human creativity, the fusion of physical sciences and artistic expression produces a masterpiece that is as harmonious as it is unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of professional painters in Kentucky. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of academic pursuits and artistic endeavors has long fascinated scholars, prompting us to delve deeper into the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in physical sciences and the burgeoning community of professional painters in the picturesque state of Kentucky. As we embark on this research journey, we cannot help but marvel at the curious confluence of intellectual rigor and creative expression, akin to a scientist mixing elements in a laboratory to concoct a wondrous potion of artistry and innovation.
While most would assume that master's degrees in physical sciences and the thriving trade of professional painters are as unrelated as a fish and a bicycle, our study unearthed a surprising kinship between these seemingly disparate domains. We were motivated by a desire to unravel this enigmatic relationship, fueled by the belief that there is more to the canvas of academia and the palette of artistic talent than meets the eye.
In the grand tradition of scholarly inquiry, we pored over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, meticulously scrutinizing numbers and trends to discern patterns that transcend the boundaries of conventional wisdom. What we uncovered was nothing short of a masterpiece in statistical intrigue – a correlation coefficient of 0.9793603, which left us marveling at the near-perfect alignment of academic achievement in physical sciences and the proliferation of professional painters in the Bluegrass State. It seems that in the realm of academic excellence, as in art, the strokes of correlation can indeed create a masterpiece of unexpected coherence.
This study seeks to chip away at the stony facade of academic orthodoxy and reveal the vibrant colors beneath, illustrating the captivating dance between scholarly pursuits and the artistry that flourishes in the rolling hills of Kentucky. As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and analysis, we invite you to join us in this revelatory exploration, where equations and pigments intertwine in a captivating waltz of intellect and ingenuity.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your berets, for we are about to embark on a journey that promises to illuminate the wondrous interplay between academia and the arts, where the brushstrokes of scientific inquiry mingle with the hues of artistic expression in a stunning tableau of unexpected harmony.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in the state of Kentucky, from 2012 to 2021. This finding suggests a striking relationship between the pursuit of advanced education in the physical sciences and the cheerful proliferation of professional painters across the Bluegrass State.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9591466 indicates that approximately 95.91% of the variation in the number of professional painters can be explained by the variation in the number of Master's degrees awarded in the physical sciences. In other words, the academic fervor in the physical sciences seems to be closely intertwined with the flourishing community of painters, as if each brushstroke of scientific discovery is mirrored by a brushstroke of artistic expression.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides convincing evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no correlation and lends statistical support to our findings. In simpler terms, the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is akin to stumbling upon a pot of gold at the end of a rainbow – highly improbable, but undeniably delightful.
Our results are graphically depicted in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees in the physical sciences and the population of professional painters in Kentucky. This visual representation vividly portrays the tight relationship between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt that the world of academia and the realm of art are engaged in a dance of unanticipated harmony.
In summation, our findings not only confirm the existence of a compelling link between academic achievements in the physical sciences and the artistic vibrancy of the painter community in Kentucky, but also serve to highlight the whimsical interconnectedness of disciplines that, at first glance, seem as different as chalk and cheese, or in this case, as different as a Bunsen burner and a paintbrush.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only uncovered an unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in the physical sciences and the community of professional painters in Kentucky but has also demonstrated the whimsical interplay between intellect and imagination, akin to a somber scientific symphony coalescing with a boisterous burst of artistic color. It appears that as scientists delve into the mysteries of the physical world, professional painters are busy concocting their own mixtures of pigments and perspectives, echoing the "Eureka!" moment with a vibrant "Easel-ika!" This correlation suggests that perhaps while some opt for the allure of quantum mechanics, others find solace in the quantum of artistic expression.

The near-perfect correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and the incredibly low p-value emphasize the robustness of this unexpected connection, leaving us in awe of the statistically significant bond between the seemingly unrelated realms of science and art. It seems that as physicists unravel the laws of the universe, painters are orchestrating their own Manifesto of Creativity, all while playing a rhapsody of hues and shades.

Our findings caution against dismissively regarding academic pursuits and artistic endeavors as unrelated domains but rather highlight the delicious serendipity of their intertwined dance. Our statistical analysis paints a captivating picture of academic excellence and artistic vibrancy merging in a symphony of unexpected coherence.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this particular area, as our work serves as a colorful reminder that brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places, like finding a hidden masterpiece in a thrift store painting or uncovering a pun in an academic paper. Let us revel in the delight of this surprising correlation and celebrate the unanticipated harmonies that lie at the crossroads of academic rigor and artistic flair.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Artistic Endeavors


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Studies in Art and Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Stroke of Genius: Exploring the Relationship Between Master's Degrees in Physical Sciences and the Flourishing of Professional Painters in Kentucky with an abstract of In this paper, we unveil the surprising connection between academic prowess in physical sciences and the vibrant community of professional painters in the state of Kentucky. By analyzing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics over the period from 2012 to 2021, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9793603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected correlation sheds light on the synergistic relationship between the world of science and art. The findings not only offer a fascinating insight into the dynamics of academic pursuits and creative professions but also highlight the tantalizing interplay between intellect and imagination. It seems that while some may excel at "mastering" physical sciences, others are busy "painting" the town red (and blue, green, and magenta). This correlation certainly paints a vivid picture of the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains. Our research serves as a colorful reminder that shades of brilliance can be found in the most unexpected places.

ChatGPT:

master's degrees, physical sciences, professional painters, Kentucky, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, academic prowess, creative professions, intellect and imagination, academic pursuits, art and science relationship, academic data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Physical sciences and science technologies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences

The number of professional painters in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of painters, construction and maintenance in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of professional painters in Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.9793603 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9591466 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of professional painters in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.7E-7. 0.0000007744545489372797000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 7.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,291,231 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences (Degrees awarded)6911701469847100713171367196712169786778
The number of professional painters in Kentucky (Laborers)1640174017201850192019502060184017001480




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6911,7014,6984,7100,7131,7136,7196,7121,6978,6778,])
array_2 = np.array([1640,1740,1720,1850,1920,1950,2060,1840,1700,1480,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Physical sciences"
array_2_name = "The number of professional painters in Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2899 · Black Variable ID: 1335 · Red Variable ID: 8535
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0