about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,997 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Nashville and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog from Nashville somehow made its way to Sierra Leone, where it interacted with the jet fuel molecules, giving them a turbo-charged boost. It's like Mother Nature's questionable recipe for supercharging plane engines! Get ready for takeoff, with a hint of Tennessee in every flight!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'. The scene depicts Nashville with thick smog hanging over the city, obscuring the skyline and making it difficult to breathe. Additionally, in Sierra Leone, there is a stream of jet fuel molecules materializing out of thin air, shimmering in the tropical sunlight. The scene should have a futuristic and otherworldly feel, evoking the iconic imagery of 'Star Wars'. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' inspired by bauhaus Oragami Cutsy graphics An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone, in the following situation: Because the increased air pollution in Nashville caused a chain reaction that disrupted the Earth's energy flow, resulting in a spontaneous creation of jet fuel molecules in Sierra Leone.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Nashville, thick smog hangs over the city, obscuring the skyline and making it difficult to breathe. Meanwhile, in Sierra Leone, a stream of jet fuel molecules suddenly materializes out of thin air, shimmering in the tropical sunlight.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In Nashville, thick smog hangs over the city, obscuring the skyline and making it difficult to breathe. Meanwhile, in Sierra Leone, a stream of jet fuel molecules suddenly materializes out of thin air, shimmering in the tropical sunlight. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'. The scene depicts Nashville with thick smog hanging over the city, obscuring the skyline and making it difficult to breathe. Additionally, in Sierra Leone, there is a stream of jet fuel molecules materializing out of thin air, shimmering in the tropical sunlight. The scene should have a futuristic and otherworldly feel, evoking the iconic imagery of 'Star Wars'.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Nashville positively influenced Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

The Journal of Global Air Quality Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a turbulent journey through the uncharted skies of academic inquiry. As we buckle up for this high-flying adventure, we aim to navigate the ever-changing atmospheric conditions of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee, and the jet fuel dynamics in Sierra Leone. While this seemingly stratospheric connection between two distant locales may appear as perplexing as navigating through a maze of jet streams, our research has set its course to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these disparate factors.

As the smog of uncertainty begins to clear, we are propelled into the heart of our inquiry by our quest to understand the atmospheric forces at play. The intercontinental scope of our investigation encompasses the clouded skies of air quality in Nashville and the fuel-saturated jet streams of Sierra Leone. It is our ambition to trace the intricate patterns swirling within this global air traffic to discern the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated variables.

So, before we fasten our scientific seatbelts and take off into the empirical stratosphere, let us acknowledge the whimsical yet significant nature of our pursuit. For in the boundless expanse of academic investigation, it seems that the air we breathe in Nashville may not be as distant from the jet fuel combusted in Sierra Leone as we previously assumed. As we embark on this scholarly excursion, we invite our readers to join us on this riotous and riveting flight through the labyrinthine trails of scientific revelry.

And remember, in the realm of scientific inquiry, when it comes to uncovering concealed connections, the sky's the limit!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a turbulent journey through the uncharted skies of academic inquiry. As we buckle up for this high-flying adventure, we aim to navigate the ever-changing atmospheric conditions of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee, and the jet fuel dynamics in Sierra Leone. While this seemingly stratospheric connection between two distant locales may appear as perplexing as navigating through a maze of jet streams, our research has set its course to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these disparate factors.
As the smog of uncertainty begins to clear, we are propelled into the heart of our inquiry by our quest to understand the atmospheric forces at play. The intercontinental scope of our investigation encompasses the clouded skies of air quality in Nashville and the fuel-saturated jet streams of Sierra Leone. It is our ambition to trace the intricate patterns swirling within this global air traffic to discern the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated variables.
So, before we fasten our scientific seatbelts and take off into the empirical stratosphere, let us acknowledge the whimsical yet significant nature of our pursuit. For in the boundless expanse of academic investigation, it seems that the air we breathe in Nashville may not be as distant from the jet fuel combusted in Sierra Leone as we previously assumed. As we embark on this scholarly excursion, we invite our readers to join us on this riotous and riveting flight through the labyrinthine trails of scientific revelry.
And remember, in the realm of scientific inquiry, when it comes to uncovering concealed connections, the sky's the limit!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their comprehensive study, Smith and Doe (2010) outlined the detrimental effects of air pollution on public health, emphasizing the need for concerted efforts to mitigate the impact of airborne pollutants. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the complexities of global air quality, highlighting the interconnected nature of environmental factors across regions.

However, as we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter a mixture of fact and fiction, much like the unexpected fusion of air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel in Sierra Leone. In "Airborne: The New Era of Pollution" by Greenfield (2018), the author presents a dramatized account of the perils of air pollution, blending scientific insights with a touch of literary flair. Conversely, "Jetstream Dreams" by Blue Sky (2013) delves into the imaginary world of aviation fascination, offering a whimsical narrative that seems tangentially relevant to our lofty pursuit.

Adding a contemporary twist to our review, social media posts have also contributed to the discourse surrounding our peculiar investigation. In a tweet by @CleanAirAdvocate, the author presents a witty comparison between breathable air and jet fuel, igniting a virtual conversation akin to the cross-continental relationship we seek to unravel. Additionally, a Reddit thread titled "Jetsetters and Smog: What's the Connection?" sparked layperson speculation, highlighting the underlying curiosity pertaining to our scholarly endeavor.

As we spiral into the literary horizon, it becomes apparent that the entanglement of air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel in Sierra Leone transcends the confines of traditional academic discourse. While our initial foray may have seemed as uncertain as predicting the flight path of a migratory bird, the amalgamation of serious research, fictional narratives, and social media musings serves as a reminder that even in the most serious of pursuits, a touch of levity can soar to unexpected heights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a turbulent journey through the uncharted skies of academic inquiry. As we buckle up for this high-flying adventure, we aim to navigate the ever-changing atmospheric conditions of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee, and the jet fuel dynamics in Sierra Leone. While this seemingly stratospheric connection between two distant locales may appear as perplexing as navigating through a maze of jet streams, our research has set its course to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these disparate factors.
As the smog of uncertainty begins to clear, we are propelled into the heart of our inquiry by our quest to understand the atmospheric forces at play. The intercontinental scope of our investigation encompasses the clouded skies of air quality in Nashville and the fuel-saturated jet streams of Sierra Leone. It is our ambition to trace the intricate patterns swirling within this global air traffic to discern the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated variables.
So, before we fasten our scientific seatbelts and take off into the empirical stratosphere, let us acknowledge the whimsical yet significant nature of our pursuit. For in the boundless expanse of academic investigation, it seems that the air we breathe in Nashville may not be as distant from the jet fuel combusted in Sierra Leone as we previously assumed. As we embark on this scholarly excursion, we invite our readers to join us on this riotous and riveting flight through the labyrinthine trails of scientific revelry.
And remember, in the realm of scientific inquiry, when it comes to uncovering concealed connections, the sky's the limit!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystifying connection between air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone, our research team conducted a multi-faceted analysis that could rival the complexity of a flight plan for a cross-continental journey. We digitized our metaphorical boarding passes and harnessed the power of data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the extensive time frame from 1980 to 2018. In a meticulous and painstaking process that could only be likened to untangling a mass of airplane headphone wires, we extracted and organized these data points, mindful of potential confounding variables.

With the data firmly in hand, we proceeded to defy gravity and launch into statistical orbit. Employing sophisticated techniques that would make aeronautical engineers green with envy, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values to examine the relationship between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. Our statistical analyses were conducted with the level of precision one might expect from a master pilot guiding a plane through turbulent weather, ensuring that our findings would not be hijacked by statistical turbulence.

Furthermore, our research incorporated novel approaches to data visualization, creating charts and graphs that rival the contrasting color palette of a picturesque sunset and inspiring awe as wide as the vista seen from an airplane window. These visual representations allowed us to soar above potential obscurities and provide a clear flight path for understanding the complex interplay between air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone.

Additionally, we employed econometric models that could navigate the economic air currents, enabling us to account for various factors that may influence the observed relationship. Like intrepid explorers unfurling a map of uncharted territories, we meticulously explored and controlled for potential confounders, ensuring that our final analysis would lead to a destination of credible and substantial findings.

In the spirit of adventurous inquiry, we believe that humor and wit are as essential as a co-pilot in this research ride. Thus, while our methodologies may have been as tangled and convoluted as an aircraft's wiring diagram, we hope that our findings will navigate the academic skies with the grace and precision of a well-executed landing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8331678, r-squared of 0.6941686, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a turbulent journey through the uncharted skies of academic inquiry. As we buckle up for this high-flying adventure, we aim to navigate the ever-changing atmospheric conditions of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee, and the jet fuel dynamics in Sierra Leone. While this seemingly stratospheric connection between two distant locales may appear as perplexing as navigating through a maze of jet streams, our research has set its course to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these disparate factors.
As the smog of uncertainty begins to clear, we are propelled into the heart of our inquiry by our quest to understand the atmospheric forces at play. The intercontinental scope of our investigation encompasses the clouded skies of air quality in Nashville and the fuel-saturated jet streams of Sierra Leone. It is our ambition to trace the intricate patterns swirling within this global air traffic to discern the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated variables.
So, before we fasten our scientific seatbelts and take off into the empirical stratosphere, let us acknowledge the whimsical yet significant nature of our pursuit. For in the boundless expanse of academic investigation, it seems that the air we breathe in Nashville may not be as distant from the jet fuel combusted in Sierra Leone as we previously assumed. As we embark on this scholarly excursion, we invite our readers to join us on this riotous and riveting flight through the labyrinthine trails of scientific revelry.
And remember, in the realm of scientific inquiry, when it comes to uncovering concealed connections, the sky's the limit!


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data on air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8331678, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6941686, and a p-value of less than 0.01. The scatterplot in Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this striking relationship, resembling a flight path that navigates the atmospheric conditions of two seemingly distant regions.

In simpler terms, the results of our investigation suggest that as air pollution levels in Nashville have fluctuated over the years, the consumption of jet fuel in Sierra Leone has mirrored these changes with surprising precision. It's almost as if the smog in the Nashville air is sending signals across the globe, guiding the jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone like a celestial air traffic controller.

This significant statistical association, which we've unearthed amidst the clouds of data and analysis, points to an unexpected intercontinental link between these variables. While initially, the prospect of a relationship between air quality and jet fuel consumption may have seemed as improbable as a penguin taking flight, our findings indicate otherwise.

The implications of our findings stretch beyond the confines of statistical significance, highlighting the interdependent nature of global environmental factors. Much like an elaborate domino display, changes in air quality in one location can trigger a sequence of effects that reverberate across the globe, including influencing energy usage in a region thousands of miles away.

In sum, our results not only call attention to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental variables but also beckon further exploration into the intricate web of relationships that govern the skies we share. As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our readers to soar alongside us and revel in the delightful and unexpected connections that permeate the world of research.

In closing, our findings remind us that in the realm of empirical inquiry, the most unlikely connections may unveil themselves, shimmering like constellations in the scientific firmament. After all, as we navigate the unseen currents of data and analysis, the sky's the limit in uncovering the hidden relationships that shape our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their comprehensive study, Smith and Doe (2010) outlined the detrimental effects of air pollution on public health, emphasizing the need for concerted efforts to mitigate the impact of airborne pollutants. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the complexities of global air quality, highlighting the interconnected nature of environmental factors across regions.
However, as we venture further into the realm of literature, we encounter a mixture of fact and fiction, much like the unexpected fusion of air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel in Sierra Leone. In "Airborne: The New Era of Pollution" by Greenfield (2018), the author presents a dramatized account of the perils of air pollution, blending scientific insights with a touch of literary flair. Conversely, "Jetstream Dreams" by Blue Sky (2013) delves into the imaginary world of aviation fascination, offering a whimsical narrative that seems tangentially relevant to our lofty pursuit.
Adding a contemporary twist to our review, social media posts have also contributed to the discourse surrounding our peculiar investigation. In a tweet by @CleanAirAdvocate, the author presents a witty comparison between breathable air and jet fuel, igniting a virtual conversation akin to the cross-continental relationship we seek to unravel. Additionally, a Reddit thread titled "Jetsetters and Smog: What's the Connection?" sparked layperson speculation, highlighting the underlying curiosity pertaining to our scholarly endeavor.
As we spiral into the literary horizon, it becomes apparent that the entanglement of air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel in Sierra Leone transcends the confines of traditional academic discourse. While our initial foray may have seemed as uncertain as predicting the flight path of a migratory bird, the amalgamation of serious research, fictional narratives, and social media musings serves as a reminder that even in the most serious of pursuits, a touch of levity can soar to unexpected heights.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data on air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8331678, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6941686, and a p-value of less than 0.01. The scatterplot in Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this striking relationship, resembling a flight path that navigates the atmospheric conditions of two seemingly distant regions.
In simpler terms, the results of our investigation suggest that as air pollution levels in Nashville have fluctuated over the years, the consumption of jet fuel in Sierra Leone has mirrored these changes with surprising precision. It's almost as if the smog in the Nashville air is sending signals across the globe, guiding the jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone like a celestial air traffic controller.
This significant statistical association, which we've unearthed amidst the clouds of data and analysis, points to an unexpected intercontinental link between these variables. While initially, the prospect of a relationship between air quality and jet fuel consumption may have seemed as improbable as a penguin taking flight, our findings indicate otherwise.
The implications of our findings stretch beyond the confines of statistical significance, highlighting the interdependent nature of global environmental factors. Much like an elaborate domino display, changes in air quality in one location can trigger a sequence of effects that reverberate across the globe, including influencing energy usage in a region thousands of miles away.
In sum, our results not only call attention to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental variables but also beckon further exploration into the intricate web of relationships that govern the skies we share. As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our readers to soar alongside us and revel in the delightful and unexpected connections that permeate the world of research.
In closing, our findings remind us that in the realm of empirical inquiry, the most unlikely connections may unveil themselves, shimmering like constellations in the scientific firmament. After all, as we navigate the unseen currents of data and analysis, the sky's the limit in uncovering the hidden relationships that shape our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unveiled a remarkable link between air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone, a connection that may have seemed as unlikely as finding a snowman in the Sahara. As we reflect on the literature review, it's intriguing to note how the academic discourse converges with elements of popular culture. The intermingling of serious scholarship and fanciful narratives echoes the unexpected fusion of air pollution and jet fuel in our investigation.

Smith and Doe (2010) emphasized the urgent need to address the impacts of air pollution on public health, and our results underscore the potential far-reaching consequences of air quality fluctuations. Indeed, the ripple effects of pollution across continents, much like a stone skipped across the waters of global interconnectedness, cannot be overlooked.

Furthermore, the whimsical narratives in Greenfield's "Airborne: The New Era of Pollution" and Blue Sky's "Jetstream Dreams," while seemingly tangential, offer an interesting parallel to our own pursuit of deciphering the interconnectedness between air pollution and jet fuel consumption. This juxtaposition of the serious and the surreal mirrors the unexpected relationship we've discovered, akin to uncovering hidden treasure in the most unlikely of places.

Our findings not only corroborate previous research but also catapult us into a realm where scientific inquiry and serendipitous discoveries collide. In a world teeming with complex and often perplexing relationships, our study serves as a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge is an exploration into uncharted territory. While our data might seem as elusive as catching a cloud, the robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value speak volumes about the tangible bond between air quality and jet fuel consumption.

As we continue to navigate this uncharted airspace of research, our results invite further exploration and consideration of the myriad connections that shape our world. The unexpected fusion of air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel in Sierra Leone beckons us to embrace the delightful quirks and peculiarities that permeate the landscape of scientific investigation. After all, in the grand symphony of knowledge, the most enchanting melodies often arise from the unlikeliest of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Nashville and Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.

Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.

Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a turbulent journey through the uncharted skies of academic inquiry. As we buckle up for this high-flying adventure, we aim to navigate the ever-changing atmospheric conditions of air pollution in Nashville, Tennessee, and the jet fuel dynamics in Sierra Leone. While this seemingly stratospheric connection between two distant locales may appear as perplexing as navigating through a maze of jet streams, our research has set its course to unravel the enigmatic relationship between these disparate factors.
As the smog of uncertainty begins to clear, we are propelled into the heart of our inquiry by our quest to understand the atmospheric forces at play. The intercontinental scope of our investigation encompasses the clouded skies of air quality in Nashville and the fuel-saturated jet streams of Sierra Leone. It is our ambition to trace the intricate patterns swirling within this global air traffic to discern the hidden connections between seemingly unrelated variables.
So, before we fasten our scientific seatbelts and take off into the empirical stratosphere, let us acknowledge the whimsical yet significant nature of our pursuit. For in the boundless expanse of academic investigation, it seems that the air we breathe in Nashville may not be as distant from the jet fuel combusted in Sierra Leone as we previously assumed. As we embark on this scholarly excursion, we invite our readers to join us on this riotous and riveting flight through the labyrinthine trails of scientific revelry.
And remember, in the realm of scientific inquiry, when it comes to uncovering concealed connections, the sky's the limit!


[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data on air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8331678, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.6941686, and a p-value of less than 0.01. The scatterplot in Figure 1 provides a visual representation of this striking relationship, resembling a flight path that navigates the atmospheric conditions of two seemingly distant regions.
In simpler terms, the results of our investigation suggest that as air pollution levels in Nashville have fluctuated over the years, the consumption of jet fuel in Sierra Leone has mirrored these changes with surprising precision. It's almost as if the smog in the Nashville air is sending signals across the globe, guiding the jet fuel consumption in Sierra Leone like a celestial air traffic controller.
This significant statistical association, which we've unearthed amidst the clouds of data and analysis, points to an unexpected intercontinental link between these variables. While initially, the prospect of a relationship between air quality and jet fuel consumption may have seemed as improbable as a penguin taking flight, our findings indicate otherwise.
The implications of our findings stretch beyond the confines of statistical significance, highlighting the interdependent nature of global environmental factors. Much like an elaborate domino display, changes in air quality in one location can trigger a sequence of effects that reverberate across the globe, including influencing energy usage in a region thousands of miles away.
In sum, our results not only call attention to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental variables but also beckon further exploration into the intricate web of relationships that govern the skies we share. As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our readers to soar alongside us and revel in the delightful and unexpected connections that permeate the world of research.
In closing, our findings remind us that in the realm of empirical inquiry, the most unlikely connections may unveil themselves, shimmering like constellations in the scientific firmament. After all, as we navigate the unseen currents of data and analysis, the sky's the limit in uncovering the hidden relationships that shape our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we glide in for a smooth landing, it is clear that our findings have taken us on a journey through the hazy skies of academic exploration. Our results not only lend credence to the surprising correlation between air pollution in Nashville and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone but also beckon attention to the importance of investigating celestial connections that extend far beyond our initial expectations. It seems that the smog in Nashville may have more influence on global jet streams than we anticipated - a reminder that in the realm of research, the most unexpected relationships often take flight. With these findings, we assert that the sky's the limit, and no further research is needed in this area. Time to let this study take off into the academic stratosphere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Global Air Quality Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Society for Atmospheric and Environmental Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Pollution in Nashville and Jet Fuel in Sierra Leone: The Sky's the Limit with an abstract of This study investigates the relationship between air pollution levels in Nashville, Tennessee, and jet fuel usage in Sierra Leone. By examining data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1980 to 2018, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8331678 and a p-value of less than 0.01 were obtained, indicating a strong and statistically significant association.
Through rigorous statistical analysis and thorough investigation, our research team has observed a noteworthy correlation between the levels of particulate matter in the air in Nashville and the volume of jet fuel consumed in Sierra Leone. While the initial connection may seem as up in the air as a jet plane, our findings suggest a tangible link between these seemingly distant factors which warrants further investigation and consideration.
Our findings not only shed light on the interconnectedness of global air quality and energy consumption but also highlight the need for international collaboration and cooperation in addressing environmental challenges. As we soar into the realm of scientific inquiry, we invite readers to join us in exploring the whimsical world of cross-continental relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. After all, as the old adage goes, the sky's the limit in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution Nashville, Tennessee, jet fuel Sierra Leone, correlation coefficient air pollution jet fuel, particulate matter air pollution, energy consumption air quality, international collaboration environmental challenges, global air quality energy consumption, cross-continental relationships variables

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Nashville
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Nashville

Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Sierra Leone in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone

Correlation r = 0.8331678 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6941686 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Nashville) over the 39 years from 1980 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.7E-11. 0.0000000000468608101652920700
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 4.7E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 21,339,793,240 random variables You don't actually need 21 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 38 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 38 because we have two variables measured over a period of 39 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Air pollution in Nashville (Bad air quality days)3.005461.095890.8219184.657534.098361.643844.109593.2876714.75412.465758.219183.561641.639344.657535.479458.493156.284156.02748.2191812.60274.644811.643844.109591.369860.2732241.643841.643843.287670.54644800.2739730.2739731.0929000000.273973
Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone (Million Barrels/Day)0.2583230.2583230.2789890.2583230.2583230.2841550.30.30.50.30.30.30.30.30.20.30.30.40.40.40.2389860.2346410.2324680.2324680.2309480.2324680.2504140.217260.2129150.2107420.2063970.208570.2107420.2042250.2020520.1977070.1846710.1890160.171636




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3.00546,1.09589,0.821918,4.65753,4.09836,1.64384,4.10959,3.28767,14.7541,2.46575,8.21918,3.56164,1.63934,4.65753,5.47945,8.49315,6.28415,6.0274,8.21918,12.6027,4.64481,1.64384,4.10959,1.36986,0.273224,1.64384,1.64384,3.28767,0.546448,0,0.273973,0.273973,1.0929,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([0.258323,0.258323,0.278989,0.258323,0.258323,0.284155,0.3,0.3,0.5,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.3,0.2,0.3,0.3,0.4,0.4,0.4,0.238986,0.234641,0.232468,0.232468,0.230948,0.232468,0.250414,0.21726,0.212915,0.210742,0.206397,0.20857,0.210742,0.204225,0.202052,0.197707,0.184671,0.189016,0.171636,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Nashville"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Sierra Leone"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2997 · Black Variable ID: 20949 · Red Variable ID: 24897
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0