about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,042 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total NBA League Revenue and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Eritrea.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As NBA revenue rises, players' salaries increase, leading to a higher demand for luxury cars. Eritrea, wanting to showcase its newfound wealth, starts importing more luxury cars, which in turn boosts fossil fuel use due to increased driving. It's a real slam dunk for the Eritrean car industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant cityscape in Eritrea, where the streets are bustling with activity. Cars adorned with basketball hoops are driving through the streets, while people gather around, enthusiastically dunking basketballs through the hoops attached to the cars. In the backdrop, there's a large fuel station with people lining up to fill their cars with extra gasoline, amidst the high-energy atmosphere of the basketball game. The colorful scene captures the intersection between the soaring NBA league revenue and increased fossil fuel use in Eritrea. The image should be realistic and vibrant, depicting the lively intersection of sports and fuel consumption in the city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Celtic art Art nouveau Minimalism Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea, in the following situation: Because as NBA revenue soared, more people started dunking on their cars instead of driving. This led to increased fossil fuel use in Eritrea as folks tried to pump up their ride's performance to match the high-flying action on the court. It's a slam dunk of a correlation, as the game's excitement spilled over into the fuel tank!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant cityscape of Eritrea, the streets are bustling with cars adorned with basketball hoops. People are gathered around, enthusiastically dunking basketballs through the hoops attached to their cars, with smiles and cheers filling the air. Meanwhile, a large fuel station nearby is bustling with activity, as people line up to fill their cars with extra gasoline to boost their performance in emulation of the high-flying action on the basketball court. The colorful scene is a clear illustration of the intersection between the soaring NBA league revenue and the increased fossil fuel use in Eritrea.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant cityscape of Eritrea, the streets are bustling with cars adorned with basketball hoops. People are gathered around, enthusiastically dunking basketballs through the hoops attached to their cars, with smiles and cheers filling the air. Meanwhile, a large fuel station nearby is bustling with activity, as people line up to fill their cars with extra gasoline to boost their performance in emulation of the high-flying action on the basketball court. The colorful scene is a clear illustration of the intersection between the soaring NBA league revenue and the increased fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant cityscape in Eritrea, where the streets are bustling with activity. Cars adorned with basketball hoops are driving through the streets, while people gather around, enthusiastically dunking basketballs through the hoops attached to the cars. In the backdrop, there's a large fuel station with people lining up to fill their cars with extra gasoline, amidst the high-energy atmosphere of the basketball game. The colorful scene captures the intersection between the soaring NBA league revenue and increased fossil fuel use in Eritrea. The image should be realistic and vibrant, depicting the lively intersection of sports and fuel consumption in the city.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Total NBA League Revenue caused Fossil fuel use in Eritrea to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea

The Journal of Sports Economics and Ecological Impacts

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between sports and the world of economics has always been a hot topic - much like the sweat on a basketball court after a heated match. However, when you throw fossil fuel use in Eritrea into the mix, things start to get really interesting. In this paper, we embark on a wild and whimsical journey to explore the connection between the Total NBA League Revenue and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It's a match-up that is as unexpected as finding a unicorn in a basketball jersey!

While the link might seem as far-fetched as a half-court buzzer-beater, our initial findings have left us in a state of bewildered glee. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 that we unearthed has all the statistical significance of a slam dunk in the NBA finals! The p-value of less than 0.01 has got us feeling as confident as a superstar player sinking a free throw. Who would've thought that the success of a basketball league would be so closely tied to the burning of fossil fuels in a small East African country?

This unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads like a team of puzzled referees. Could it be that the more money the NBA rakes in, the more Eritreans turn to fossil fuels to fire up their daily lives? Or is there something deeper at play here, like a game-changing strategy devised by the basketball-loving energy industry?

Intrigued by this serendipitous discovery, we aim to unravel the source of this peculiar association, delving into the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and get ready for a game of thrilling twists and turns as we attempt to make sense of this delightful and eccentric link between b-ball bucks and fossil fuel fervor in Eritrea.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between sports and the world of economics has always been a hot topic - much like the sweat on a basketball court after a heated match. However, when you throw fossil fuel use in Eritrea into the mix, things start to get really interesting. In this paper, we embark on a wild and whimsical journey to explore the connection between the Total NBA League Revenue and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It's a match-up that is as unexpected as finding a unicorn in a basketball jersey!
While the link might seem as far-fetched as a half-court buzzer-beater, our initial findings have left us in a state of bewildered glee. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 that we unearthed has all the statistical significance of a slam dunk in the NBA finals! The p-value of less than 0.01 has got us feeling as confident as a superstar player sinking a free throw. Who would've thought that the success of a basketball league would be so closely tied to the burning of fossil fuels in a small East African country?
This unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads like a team of puzzled referees. Could it be that the more money the NBA rakes in, the more Eritreans turn to fossil fuels to fire up their daily lives? Or is there something deeper at play here, like a game-changing strategy devised by the basketball-loving energy industry?
Intrigued by this serendipitous discovery, we aim to unravel the source of this peculiar association, delving into the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and get ready for a game of thrilling twists and turns as we attempt to make sense of this delightful and eccentric link between b-ball bucks and fossil fuel fervor in Eritrea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have delved into the tantalizing relationship between sports economics and energy consumption, but few have ventured into the wacky world of basketball revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Smith et al. (2010) explored the economic impacts of major sporting events on energy consumption, while Doe and Jones (2015) examined the intricate web of factors influencing fossil fuel use in developing countries. However, these studies overlooked the peculiar intersection of NBA revenue and Eritrean fuel habits.

Moving beyond the academic realm, real-world accounts offer intriguing perspectives on energy usage and the enchanting allure of sports. In "The Prize" by Daniel Yergin, the authors explore the historical interplay between energy resources and economic power, but fail to mention the swish of a basketball net in the context of fossil fuel consumption. On a parallel note, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis showcases the savvy analytics of sports economics, yet fails to uncover the slam dunk of a correlation between NBA revenue and fuel use in Eritrea.

Venturing further into the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Quidditch Through the Ages" provides a fantastical take on the economics of a magical sport, but regrettably omits any mention of fossil fuels or Eritrea. Similarly, in Isaac Asimov's "The Caves of Steel," the futuristic blend of sports and society fails to touch upon the unexpected fusion of NBA wealth and Eritrean energy patterns.

As the search for literature extended to unconventional sources, the authors found no relevant information in the collected data. Instead, they resorted to perusing the backs of shampoo bottles, where they encountered delightful trivia about ingredients, none of which shed light on the enchantingly bizarre relationship between NBA league revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statisa and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between sports and the world of economics has always been a hot topic - much like the sweat on a basketball court after a heated match. However, when you throw fossil fuel use in Eritrea into the mix, things start to get really interesting. In this paper, we embark on a wild and whimsical journey to explore the connection between the Total NBA League Revenue and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It's a match-up that is as unexpected as finding a unicorn in a basketball jersey!
While the link might seem as far-fetched as a half-court buzzer-beater, our initial findings have left us in a state of bewildered glee. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 that we unearthed has all the statistical significance of a slam dunk in the NBA finals! The p-value of less than 0.01 has got us feeling as confident as a superstar player sinking a free throw. Who would've thought that the success of a basketball league would be so closely tied to the burning of fossil fuels in a small East African country?
This unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads like a team of puzzled referees. Could it be that the more money the NBA rakes in, the more Eritreans turn to fossil fuels to fire up their daily lives? Or is there something deeper at play here, like a game-changing strategy devised by the basketball-loving energy industry?
Intrigued by this serendipitous discovery, we aim to unravel the source of this peculiar association, delving into the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and get ready for a game of thrilling twists and turns as we attempt to make sense of this delightful and eccentric link between b-ball bucks and fossil fuel fervor in Eritrea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing connection between Total NBA League Revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea, our research team employed a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and a sprinkle of whimsy. We scoured the corners of the internet, much like a persistent point guard driving through the defense, to gather relevant data from 2002 to 2021. The primary sources of our data were Statisa and the Energy Information Administration, which provided us with the vital statistics necessary to unravel this curious correlation.

Our initial step was akin to a behind-the-scenes playmaker, as we meticulously collected annual Total NBA League Revenue figures and fossil fuel consumption data for Eritrea. Like a meticulous coach crafting a winning game plan, we organized the data into a coherent, analyzable format, ensuring that no rogue turnovers or missed rebounds would disrupt our statistical maneuvers.

With our datasets in hand, we donned our metaphorical lab coats and unleashed a volley of statistical analyses to uncover the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Using the time-tested tools of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we sought to tease out any hidden connections lurking between the bounces of a basketball and the burning of fossil fuels.

Our pursuit of truth led us to uncover a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and a tantalizingly small p-value of less than 0.01. These findings were as surprising as a last-second, full-court shot swishing through the net, prompting a collective eruption of bewildered glee among our research team.

Despite the light-hearted nature of our subject matter, we approached our statistical analyses with the gravity of a championship game. Our rigorous methods upheld the principles of academic research while embracing the unconventional nature of our investigation. The curious confluence of sports economics and global energy consumption provided a canvas for our academic prowess to dance a pirouette with the whimsy of unexpected connections.

In conclusion, our methodological approach blended the rigor of traditional statistical analysis with the playful spirit befitting a study of such a delightfully improbable link. This methodology allowed us to waltz through the complex data landscape with the grace of a seasoned ballerina, unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea with a dash of flair and a sprinkle of statistical stardust.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statisa and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9572763, r-squared of 0.9163778, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between sports and the world of economics has always been a hot topic - much like the sweat on a basketball court after a heated match. However, when you throw fossil fuel use in Eritrea into the mix, things start to get really interesting. In this paper, we embark on a wild and whimsical journey to explore the connection between the Total NBA League Revenue and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It's a match-up that is as unexpected as finding a unicorn in a basketball jersey!
While the link might seem as far-fetched as a half-court buzzer-beater, our initial findings have left us in a state of bewildered glee. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 that we unearthed has all the statistical significance of a slam dunk in the NBA finals! The p-value of less than 0.01 has got us feeling as confident as a superstar player sinking a free throw. Who would've thought that the success of a basketball league would be so closely tied to the burning of fossil fuels in a small East African country?
This unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads like a team of puzzled referees. Could it be that the more money the NBA rakes in, the more Eritreans turn to fossil fuels to fire up their daily lives? Or is there something deeper at play here, like a game-changing strategy devised by the basketball-loving energy industry?
Intrigued by this serendipitous discovery, we aim to unravel the source of this peculiar association, delving into the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and get ready for a game of thrilling twists and turns as we attempt to make sense of this delightful and eccentric link between b-ball bucks and fossil fuel fervor in Eritrea.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a robust and noteworthy correlation between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea for the period 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9163778, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in fossil fuel use in Eritrea can be explained by the variations in NBA league revenue.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the two variables, leaving our research team feeling as victorious as a team that's just clinched the championship.

The evidence from the scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the striking connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as a well-executed pick and roll, emphasizing the strong association between the two variables.

These findings highlight the unexpected and whimsical link between the success of the NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It seems that when the NBA thrives, so does the demand for fossil fuels in this East African country. This unanticipated association opens the door to a world of possibilities for further research and exploration into the intertwined realms of sports economics and global energy consumption.

In light of these results, it's clear that the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea is no air ball. Instead, it's a fascinating alley-oop of unforeseen correlations that beckons for continued investigation and analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have delved into the tantalizing relationship between sports economics and energy consumption, but few have ventured into the wacky world of basketball revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Smith et al. (2010) explored the economic impacts of major sporting events on energy consumption, while Doe and Jones (2015) examined the intricate web of factors influencing fossil fuel use in developing countries. However, these studies overlooked the peculiar intersection of NBA revenue and Eritrean fuel habits.
Moving beyond the academic realm, real-world accounts offer intriguing perspectives on energy usage and the enchanting allure of sports. In "The Prize" by Daniel Yergin, the authors explore the historical interplay between energy resources and economic power, but fail to mention the swish of a basketball net in the context of fossil fuel consumption. On a parallel note, "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis showcases the savvy analytics of sports economics, yet fails to uncover the slam dunk of a correlation between NBA revenue and fuel use in Eritrea.
Venturing further into the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Quidditch Through the Ages" provides a fantastical take on the economics of a magical sport, but regrettably omits any mention of fossil fuels or Eritrea. Similarly, in Isaac Asimov's "The Caves of Steel," the futuristic blend of sports and society fails to touch upon the unexpected fusion of NBA wealth and Eritrean energy patterns.
As the search for literature extended to unconventional sources, the authors found no relevant information in the collected data. Instead, they resorted to perusing the backs of shampoo bottles, where they encountered delightful trivia about ingredients, none of which shed light on the enchantingly bizarre relationship between NBA league revenue and fossil fuel use in Eritrea.


[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a robust and noteworthy correlation between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea for the period 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9163778, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in fossil fuel use in Eritrea can be explained by the variations in NBA league revenue.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the two variables, leaving our research team feeling as victorious as a team that's just clinched the championship.
The evidence from the scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the striking connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as a well-executed pick and roll, emphasizing the strong association between the two variables.
These findings highlight the unexpected and whimsical link between the success of the NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It seems that when the NBA thrives, so does the demand for fossil fuels in this East African country. This unanticipated association opens the door to a world of possibilities for further research and exploration into the intertwined realms of sports economics and global energy consumption.
In light of these results, it's clear that the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea is no air ball. Instead, it's a fascinating alley-oop of unforeseen correlations that beckons for continued investigation and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a rather unconventional relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. Our results align with previous research that has explored the curious intersection of sports economics and energy consumption, albeit in more traditional contexts. Despite the inherent whimsy and seeming incongruity of our research topic, the robust correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and the p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a striking connection between these variables.

This unexpected connection harkens back to the offbeat items mentioned in the literature review, such as the oversight of NBA revenue and Eritrean fuel habits in scholarly works and literary masterpieces, including J.K. Rowling's musings on Quidditch economics and Isaac Asimov's futuristic amalgamation of sports and society. While these references were made in jest, our results only serve to validate the depth and breadth of our meticulously absurd investigation.

The strong positive relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea suggests that as the NBA flourishes, Eritrea's demand for fossil fuels grows. It's as peculiar a linkage as finding a basketball hoop in a desert, yet our data unambiguously underscores this correlation. The r-squared value of 0.9163778 further emphasizes that the variability in Eritrea's fossil fuel use can be predominantly explained by fluctuations in NBA league revenue, leaving very little room for interpretation or skepticism.

The scatterplot visualization of our findings complements the numerical data, evoking the image of an expertly executed pick and roll with its clear and undeniable pattern. It not only underscores the significance of our results but also serves as a metaphorical slam dunk in elucidating the unexpected kinship between the success of the NBA and the utilization of fossil fuels in Eritrea.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on a previously overlooked and undeniably amusing relationship, challenging the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. This humorous and unlikely pairing presents an opportunity for further investigation and the potential for even more surprising revelations. It seems that in the game of academic research, just like in basketball, there are always unexpected alley-oops waiting to be discovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil fuel use in Eritrea. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between sports and the world of economics has always been a hot topic - much like the sweat on a basketball court after a heated match. However, when you throw fossil fuel use in Eritrea into the mix, things start to get really interesting. In this paper, we embark on a wild and whimsical journey to explore the connection between the Total NBA League Revenue and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It's a match-up that is as unexpected as finding a unicorn in a basketball jersey!
While the link might seem as far-fetched as a half-court buzzer-beater, our initial findings have left us in a state of bewildered glee. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 that we unearthed has all the statistical significance of a slam dunk in the NBA finals! The p-value of less than 0.01 has got us feeling as confident as a superstar player sinking a free throw. Who would've thought that the success of a basketball league would be so closely tied to the burning of fossil fuels in a small East African country?
This unexpected correlation has left us scratching our heads like a team of puzzled referees. Could it be that the more money the NBA rakes in, the more Eritreans turn to fossil fuels to fire up their daily lives? Or is there something deeper at play here, like a game-changing strategy devised by the basketball-loving energy industry?
Intrigued by this serendipitous discovery, we aim to unravel the source of this peculiar association, delving into the realms of sports economics and global energy consumption. So sit back, grab some popcorn, and get ready for a game of thrilling twists and turns as we attempt to make sense of this delightful and eccentric link between b-ball bucks and fossil fuel fervor in Eritrea.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a robust and noteworthy correlation between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea for the period 2002 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was further supported by the r-squared value of 0.9163778, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in fossil fuel use in Eritrea can be explained by the variations in NBA league revenue.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between the two variables, leaving our research team feeling as victorious as a team that's just clinched the championship.
The evidence from the scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the striking connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. The data points form a pattern that is as clear as a well-executed pick and roll, emphasizing the strong association between the two variables.
These findings highlight the unexpected and whimsical link between the success of the NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea. It seems that when the NBA thrives, so does the demand for fossil fuels in this East African country. This unanticipated association opens the door to a world of possibilities for further research and exploration into the intertwined realms of sports economics and global energy consumption.
In light of these results, it's clear that the connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea is no air ball. Instead, it's a fascinating alley-oop of unforeseen correlations that beckons for continued investigation and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a dazzling and unexpected correlation between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. The robust relationship between the success of the NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in this East African nation has left us feeling as bewildered as a mascot trying to make a half-court shot.

It seems that as the NBA thrives and rakes in the big bucks, so does the demand for fossil fuels in Eritrea. The link between these seemingly disparate entities is as intriguing as a buzzer-beater that decides the fate of a championship game.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and a p-value of less than 0.01, have shaken up the world of sports economics and global energy consumption like a thunderous dunk shattering the backboard. It's almost as if the success of the NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea are engaged in a game of one-on-one, with each trying to outdo the other in a grand display of economic and environmental prowess.

This remarkable association is as unexpected as a referee joining the dance cam during a timeout. It raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay between sports and global energy dynamics, leaving us pondering whether there's a deeper strategy at play, akin to a savvy playmaker orchestrating every move on the court.

In light of these revelatory findings, it is apparent that further research in this area may yield valuable insights. However, it is our firm belief that the quirky and delightful connection between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea has been thoroughly explored in this study, and no further research is needed in this capricious and fascinating realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Economics and Ecological Impacts


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eclectic Basketball and Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Slam Dunk and Gas Guzzlers: Exploring the Playful Link Between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea with an abstract of This study delves into the whimsical relationship between Total NBA League Revenue and Fossil Fuel Use in Eritrea from 2002 to 2021. Utilizing data from Statisa and Energy Information Administration, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9572763 and p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a surprisingly robust connection between the success of NBA and the consumption of fossil fuels in Eritrea, leaving researchers and basketball fans alike in a state of hoop-la! This unlikely association prompts further investigation into the interplay between sports economics and global energy consumption.

ChatGPT:

"Total NBA League Revenue," "Fossil Fuel Use," "Eritrea," "NBA revenue correlation," "Fossil fuel consumption correlation," "Economic impact of sports," "Global energy consumption," "NBA economic analysis," "Eritrea energy statistics," "NBA revenue trends," "Fossil fuel usage trends," "Sports economics and energy consumption"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total NBA League Revenue
Source: Statisa
See what else correlates with Total NBA League Revenue

Fossil fuel use in Eritrea
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Eritrea in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Eritrea

Correlation r = 0.9572763 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9163778 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Eritrea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total NBA League Revenue) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-11. 0.0000000000385627465383701160
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.9E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25,931,762,900 random variables You don't actually need 25 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Total NBA League Revenue (Billion US Dollars)2.662.722.933.193.373.573.773.793.813.963.684.564.795.185.177.378.018.767.926.41
Fossil fuel use in Eritrea (Billion kWh)0.242520.259440.265080.269780.250980.268840.26790.275420.290460.30080.311140.317720.32430.330880.337460.40420.41830.431460.4096560.435874




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2.66,2.72,2.93,3.19,3.37,3.57,3.77,3.79,3.81,3.96,3.68,4.56,4.79,5.18,5.17,7.37,8.01,8.76,7.92,6.41,])
array_2 = np.array([0.24252,0.25944,0.26508,0.26978,0.25098,0.26884,0.2679,0.27542,0.29046,0.3008,0.31114,0.31772,0.3243,0.33088,0.33746,0.4042,0.4183,0.43146,0.409656,0.435874,])
array_1_name = "Total NBA League Revenue"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Eritrea"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3042 · Black Variable ID: 411 · Red Variable ID: 23652
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0