about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,767 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Storm and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Storm gained popularity, it created a ripple effect of enthusiasm and 'current'-ly charged energy in the region. The 'reign' of this electrifying name sparked a surge in hydropower generation, as people were 'flooded' with a renewed sense of 'watt'-er power. It seems the connection between the name Storm and hydropower in Kosovo is truly 'shock'-ing!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that symbolizes the impact of renewable energy on a small town in Kosovo. Depict a bustling playground filled with children, with a group of kids cheerfully playing with kites. The wind picks up, twirling their kites higher and higher. Along the nearby river, showcase hydroelectric turbines spinning fiercely, illuminated in the distance by the setting sun. The combined effect of the strong winds and efficient hydro power generation showcases the positive impact of renewable energy on the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Cute 2D animation Symbolism Hyper-realistic Macabre
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo, in the following situation: Because the increased popularity of the first name Storm led to more parents naming their kids after extreme weather events, which in turn caused a surge in atmospheric pressure over Kosovo. This increase in atmospheric pressure resulted in stronger winds, leading to more efficient hydroelectric power generation in the region. So, basically, storms named Storm brought about a storm of hydro energy.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small Kosovo town, a bustling playground is filled with children. Among them, a group of kids cheerfully play with kites, their laughter echoing in the air. The wind picks up, twirling their kites higher and higher. Along the nearby river, the hydroelectric turbines spin fiercely, illuminated in the distance by the setting sun. The combined effect of the strong winds and efficient hydro power generation showcases the positive impact Storm's popularity has brought to Kosovo.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In a small Kosovo town, a bustling playground is filled with children. Among them, a group of kids cheerfully play with kites, their laughter echoing in the air. The wind picks up, twirling their kites higher and higher. Along the nearby river, the hydroelectric turbines spin fiercely, illuminated in the distance by the setting sun. The combined effect of the strong winds and efficient hydro power generation showcases the positive impact Storm's popularity has brought to Kosovo. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that symbolizes the impact of renewable energy on a small town in Kosovo. Depict a bustling playground filled with children, with a group of kids cheerfully playing with kites. The wind picks up, twirling their kites higher and higher. Along the nearby river, showcase hydroelectric turbines spinning fiercely, illuminated in the distance by the setting sun. The combined effect of the strong winds and efficient hydro power generation showcases the positive impact of renewable energy on the town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Storm caused Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Storm and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to a whirlwind journey through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis and nomenclature quirks. In this outlandish yet meticulously researched paper, we unravel the mesmerizing tale of the peculiar parallel universe where the propagation of the first name "Storm" appears to coalesce with the hydroelectric power generation in none other than the enchanting land of Kosovo.

Gird your loins, for we are about to steer through a squall of data points and gales of linguistic ponderings, all in pursuit of understanding the unfathomable connection between a name that evokes visions of tempestuous winds and the generation of sustainable energy. As we traverse this whimsical landscape, you may find yourself pondering the age-old question: "What do you call a storm that generates hydroelectric power? A hydro-storm!"

Our investigation delves into the realms of both sociology and energy economics, attempting to unfurl the enigmatic ties between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in the heartland of Kosovo. A word of warning: prepare for a sprinkling of data puns and a downpour of name-related humor, as we navigate the confluence of two seemingly disparate phenomena.

The very premise of this inquiry may elicit raised eyebrows and quizzical expressions, prompting the inevitable query: "What do you call a name-related study about hydroelectric power? A stormy statistical adventure!" But fear not, for we are not deterred by the unconventional and the unexpected; instead, we embrace the stormy seas of empirical investigation with fervor and whimsy.

Our remarkable findings, detailed in the abstract, unearth an undeniable correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in Kosovo, leaving us with an imperative to ponder the legendary query: "Why don't storms ever become good economists? They always make terrible forecasts!"

Illuminate your intellect and prepare for a deluge of revelatory insights as we embark on this droll yet insightful journey. The storm surge is upon us, and we are ready to brave the wild winds of academic exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to a whirlwind journey through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis and nomenclature quirks. In this outlandish yet meticulously researched paper, we unravel the mesmerizing tale of the peculiar parallel universe where the propagation of the first name "Storm" appears to coalesce with the hydroelectric power generation in none other than the enchanting land of Kosovo.
Gird your loins, for we are about to steer through a squall of data points and gales of linguistic ponderings, all in pursuit of understanding the unfathomable connection between a name that evokes visions of tempestuous winds and the generation of sustainable energy. As we traverse this whimsical landscape, you may find yourself pondering the age-old question: "What do you call a storm that generates hydroelectric power? A hydro-storm!"
Our investigation delves into the realms of both sociology and energy economics, attempting to unfurl the enigmatic ties between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in the heartland of Kosovo. A word of warning: prepare for a sprinkling of data puns and a downpour of name-related humor, as we navigate the confluence of two seemingly disparate phenomena.
The very premise of this inquiry may elicit raised eyebrows and quizzical expressions, prompting the inevitable query: "What do you call a name-related study about hydroelectric power? A stormy statistical adventure!" But fear not, for we are not deterred by the unconventional and the unexpected; instead, we embrace the stormy seas of empirical investigation with fervor and whimsy.
Our remarkable findings, detailed in the abstract, unearth an undeniable correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in Kosovo, leaving us with an imperative to ponder the legendary query: "Why don't storms ever become good economists? They always make terrible forecasts!"
Illuminate your intellect and prepare for a deluge of revelatory insights as we embark on this droll yet insightful journey. The storm surge is upon us, and we are ready to brave the wild winds of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe's ground-breaking study, "Names and Energy: A Statistical Examination," the authors find a curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. Their analysis presents compelling evidence of a positive correlation, sparking discussions about the potential influence of nomenclature on renewable energy production. However, as we wade deeper into this intriguing topic, we must also consider the implications of naming conventions on atmospheric phenomena, raising the age-old question: "What do you call a windstorm that loves electricity? A fan of power!"

In a similar vein, Jones et al. in "Monikers and Megawatts: Exploring Unconventional Correlations," delve into the realm of social trends and electricity generation, revealing a remarkable association between the surge in hydroelectric power production and the prevalence of the name "Storm" in Kosovo. This finding ignites a storm of curiosity regarding the underlying mechanisms behind such an unexpected connection, prompting the whimsical inquiry: "Why did the storm break up with the wind? It just couldn't handle the commitment!"

Moving beyond the academic sphere, non-fiction works such as "The Power of Names" by John Smith and "Energy Economics: A Comprehensive Overview" by Jane Doe shed light on the intricacies of naming conventions and their potential influence on power generation. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the influence of fictional literature on our understanding of the subject. Works like "Storm Chasers and Sustainable Energy" by J.K. Rowling and "Winds of Change: A Tale of Energy and Identity" by George R.R. Martin offer imaginative insights into the intersection of nomenclature and energy, sparking both academic curiosity and a flurry of amusing wordplay.

In the realm of popular culture and internet memes, the "Ain't Nobody Got Time for That" meme humorously reflects the societal sentiment towards conventional energy sources, as the popularity of the name "Storm" seemingly surges in tandem with the preference for sustainable hydroelectric power. Additionally, the "It's Raining Men" meme playfully alludes to the atmospheric implications of the stormy nomenclature, adding a lighthearted touch to our contemplation of this unconventional correlation.

As we navigate through this peculiar and riveting research landscape, it becomes evident that the interdisciplinary nature of this study provides a fertile ground for both intellectual inquiry and comedic interludes. The storm of discussion surrounding the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo continues to gather momentum, leaving us with a riddle to ponder: "What do you call a storm that's named after sustainable energy? A brainstorm!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2008 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to a whirlwind journey through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis and nomenclature quirks. In this outlandish yet meticulously researched paper, we unravel the mesmerizing tale of the peculiar parallel universe where the propagation of the first name "Storm" appears to coalesce with the hydroelectric power generation in none other than the enchanting land of Kosovo.
Gird your loins, for we are about to steer through a squall of data points and gales of linguistic ponderings, all in pursuit of understanding the unfathomable connection between a name that evokes visions of tempestuous winds and the generation of sustainable energy. As we traverse this whimsical landscape, you may find yourself pondering the age-old question: "What do you call a storm that generates hydroelectric power? A hydro-storm!"
Our investigation delves into the realms of both sociology and energy economics, attempting to unfurl the enigmatic ties between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in the heartland of Kosovo. A word of warning: prepare for a sprinkling of data puns and a downpour of name-related humor, as we navigate the confluence of two seemingly disparate phenomena.
The very premise of this inquiry may elicit raised eyebrows and quizzical expressions, prompting the inevitable query: "What do you call a name-related study about hydroelectric power? A stormy statistical adventure!" But fear not, for we are not deterred by the unconventional and the unexpected; instead, we embrace the stormy seas of empirical investigation with fervor and whimsy.
Our remarkable findings, detailed in the abstract, unearth an undeniable correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in Kosovo, leaving us with an imperative to ponder the legendary query: "Why don't storms ever become good economists? They always make terrible forecasts!"
Illuminate your intellect and prepare for a deluge of revelatory insights as we embark on this droll yet insightful journey. The storm surge is upon us, and we are ready to brave the wild winds of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In our research, we employed a mixture of numerical analyses, linguistic observations, and a healthy amount of whimsical jocularity to uncover the mysterious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. Our approach can be best described as a fusion of statistical wizardry, linguistic sleuthing, and an affinity for puns that even the pun-tificating scholars of old would admire.

To commence our investigation, we scoured the labyrinthine depths of the US Social Security Administration's database, where we unearthed the frequency of the name "Storm" given to newborns in the United States from 2008 to 2021. This data served as the cornerstone of our inquiry, akin to the calm before the impending storm. As we delved deeper into the data, we meticulously examined trends related to the ebb and flow of "Storm" as a first name, fashioning a barometer for societal nomenclature trends that surpassed even the most tempestuous predictions.

Simultaneously, we commenced our maritime expedition into the prodigious reservoirs of the Energy Information Administration, aiming to capture the thunderous echoes of hydroelectric energy generation in Kosovo during the same time span. Conjuring a deluge of power-related data, we meticulously scrutinized the hydroelectric power output, allowing us to visualize the undulating waves of energy production that mirrored the capricious nature of a storm dance.

Pivoting to the statistical realm, we performed a wave of calculations designed to extract the essence of the concurrent occurrences of "Storm" namesakes and hydroelectric power generation. Employing a concoction of correlation analyses, regression modeling, and trendy techniques reminiscent of an eccentric dance with numbers, we sought to bring to light the magnetic pull that the name "Storm" exerted on the hydroelectric energy landscape, prompting the never-ending question: "Why did the statistics professor always carry a ruler? To measure the impressive wave of data!"

Now, in the spirit of veritable scientific daring, we applied an unorthodox approach to juxtapose the frequency of the name "Storm" against the hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. Through a series of pun-intended visual representations, we embarked on an odyssey to capture the essence of the storm's undeniable influence on the hydroelectric power production, amidst the occasional punny quips that served as beacon lights in our journey. Our compelling visualizations unveiled the tempestuous dance between nomenclature and energy, culminating in a kaleidoscope of interconnected patterns that left us amused and electrified at the same time.

In the end, our research methodology was as eclectic as the union between rainfall and hydroelectric turbines, paving the way for a captivating and pun-filled exploration into the mesmerizing relationship between the name "Storm" and the generation of hydroelectric power in Kosovo.

Stay tuned for our next paper, "Gust Relations: Investigating the Effect of Windy Names on Renewable Energy Sources."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2008 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9152536, r-squared of 0.8376892, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to a whirlwind journey through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis and nomenclature quirks. In this outlandish yet meticulously researched paper, we unravel the mesmerizing tale of the peculiar parallel universe where the propagation of the first name "Storm" appears to coalesce with the hydroelectric power generation in none other than the enchanting land of Kosovo.
Gird your loins, for we are about to steer through a squall of data points and gales of linguistic ponderings, all in pursuit of understanding the unfathomable connection between a name that evokes visions of tempestuous winds and the generation of sustainable energy. As we traverse this whimsical landscape, you may find yourself pondering the age-old question: "What do you call a storm that generates hydroelectric power? A hydro-storm!"
Our investigation delves into the realms of both sociology and energy economics, attempting to unfurl the enigmatic ties between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in the heartland of Kosovo. A word of warning: prepare for a sprinkling of data puns and a downpour of name-related humor, as we navigate the confluence of two seemingly disparate phenomena.
The very premise of this inquiry may elicit raised eyebrows and quizzical expressions, prompting the inevitable query: "What do you call a name-related study about hydroelectric power? A stormy statistical adventure!" But fear not, for we are not deterred by the unconventional and the unexpected; instead, we embrace the stormy seas of empirical investigation with fervor and whimsy.
Our remarkable findings, detailed in the abstract, unearth an undeniable correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in Kosovo, leaving us with an imperative to ponder the legendary query: "Why don't storms ever become good economists? They always make terrible forecasts!"
Illuminate your intellect and prepare for a deluge of revelatory insights as we embark on this droll yet insightful journey. The storm surge is upon us, and we are ready to brave the wild winds of academic exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Unveiling the climactic results of our gallant odyssey, we are thrilled to announce the emergence of a dazzling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric energy generated in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 has left us feeling positively charged, like a lightning bolt of statistical significance. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8376892, suggesting that a whopping 83.77% of the variability in hydroelectric power generation can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Storm." It seems that the name "Storm" is not just a passing breeze, but a significant force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape.

In true academically responsible fashion, we also uncovered a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the correlation between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power production is indeed statistically significant. The odds of this relationship occurring by mere chance are lower than a submarine in a sea of statistical veracity. It appears that the stormy moniker "Storm" is more than just a gust of wind; it holds a palpable sway over hydroelectric energy production in Kosovo.

Furthermore, our research team is eager to present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually depicts the robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo. Brace yourselves for a visual masterpiece that captures the electrifying nature of this unexpected relationship. It's certainly a plot twist worthy of a stormy, name-related adventure, wouldn't you agree?

So, there you have it, folks. The storm has spoken, and the winds of empirical evidence do blow in the favor of a captivating link between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. It seems that the impact of a name can indeed reverberate through the currents of energy economics. As this paper draws to a close, we leave you with a final punny sentiment: "Why did the weather forecaster break up with the name 'Storm'? They just couldn't weather the emotional forecast!" Thank you for weathering the storm of our quirky investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Doe's ground-breaking study, "Names and Energy: A Statistical Examination," the authors find a curious relationship between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. Their analysis presents compelling evidence of a positive correlation, sparking discussions about the potential influence of nomenclature on renewable energy production. However, as we wade deeper into this intriguing topic, we must also consider the implications of naming conventions on atmospheric phenomena, raising the age-old question: "What do you call a windstorm that loves electricity? A fan of power!"
In a similar vein, Jones et al. in "Monikers and Megawatts: Exploring Unconventional Correlations," delve into the realm of social trends and electricity generation, revealing a remarkable association between the surge in hydroelectric power production and the prevalence of the name "Storm" in Kosovo. This finding ignites a storm of curiosity regarding the underlying mechanisms behind such an unexpected connection, prompting the whimsical inquiry: "Why did the storm break up with the wind? It just couldn't handle the commitment!"
Moving beyond the academic sphere, non-fiction works such as "The Power of Names" by John Smith and "Energy Economics: A Comprehensive Overview" by Jane Doe shed light on the intricacies of naming conventions and their potential influence on power generation. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the influence of fictional literature on our understanding of the subject. Works like "Storm Chasers and Sustainable Energy" by J.K. Rowling and "Winds of Change: A Tale of Energy and Identity" by George R.R. Martin offer imaginative insights into the intersection of nomenclature and energy, sparking both academic curiosity and a flurry of amusing wordplay.
In the realm of popular culture and internet memes, the "Ain't Nobody Got Time for That" meme humorously reflects the societal sentiment towards conventional energy sources, as the popularity of the name "Storm" seemingly surges in tandem with the preference for sustainable hydroelectric power. Additionally, the "It's Raining Men" meme playfully alludes to the atmospheric implications of the stormy nomenclature, adding a lighthearted touch to our contemplation of this unconventional correlation.
As we navigate through this peculiar and riveting research landscape, it becomes evident that the interdisciplinary nature of this study provides a fertile ground for both intellectual inquiry and comedic interludes. The storm of discussion surrounding the relationship between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo continues to gather momentum, leaving us with a riddle to ponder: "What do you call a storm that's named after sustainable energy? A brainstorm!"

[[RESULTS]]
Unveiling the climactic results of our gallant odyssey, we are thrilled to announce the emergence of a dazzling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric energy generated in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 has left us feeling positively charged, like a lightning bolt of statistical significance. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8376892, suggesting that a whopping 83.77% of the variability in hydroelectric power generation can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Storm." It seems that the name "Storm" is not just a passing breeze, but a significant force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape.
In true academically responsible fashion, we also uncovered a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the correlation between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power production is indeed statistically significant. The odds of this relationship occurring by mere chance are lower than a submarine in a sea of statistical veracity. It appears that the stormy moniker "Storm" is more than just a gust of wind; it holds a palpable sway over hydroelectric energy production in Kosovo.
Furthermore, our research team is eager to present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually depicts the robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo. Brace yourselves for a visual masterpiece that captures the electrifying nature of this unexpected relationship. It's certainly a plot twist worthy of a stormy, name-related adventure, wouldn't you agree?
So, there you have it, folks. The storm has spoken, and the winds of empirical evidence do blow in the favor of a captivating link between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. It seems that the impact of a name can indeed reverberate through the currents of energy economics. As this paper draws to a close, we leave you with a final punny sentiment: "Why did the weather forecaster break up with the name 'Storm'? They just couldn't weather the emotional forecast!" Thank you for weathering the storm of our quirky investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our outlandish yet compelling study has opened a veritable Pandora's box of questions about the correlation between the popularity of the name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. Our findings not only corroborate the groundbreaking work of Smith and Doe, as well as Jones et al., but they also bring to light the electrifying impact of nomenclature on sustainable energy production. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results leave little room for doubt about the thunderous influence of the name "Storm" on hydroelectric power output.

The emergence of this significant relationship offers a tempest-tossed yet captivating glimpse into the unusual connections that exist in the realm of energy economics. It seems that the storm naming convention has truly brewed up a storm of its own in the hydroelectric power generation landscape. It's an unlikely marriage of statistical trends and social conventions that has left us thunderstruck with its implications.

We are not merely blowing hot air – our results stand as a testament to the unanticipated significance of a name in shaping the renewable energy landscape. The surge in hydroelectric power production appears to be riding on the winds of societal trends, symbolized by the rising popularity of the name "Storm." It goes to show that when it comes to empirical relationships, sometimes the most unexpected variables can wield a substantial impact.

Our research team's meticulous analysis has not only confirmed the previous findings but has also put a unique spin on the discourse surrounding the societal and environmental implications of naming conventions. This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that even the most unconventional variables can have a stormy impact on empirical relationships. It's a revelation that is sure to elicit more than a few thunderstruck reactions and, of course, a plethora of puns.

In closing, our inquiry into the mystical ties between the name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation has left us with a profound realization – that sometimes, even the most whimsical subjects can lead to a deluge of scholarly discussions. As we leave you with this agglomerate of findings, we hope our research triggers a lightning bolt of curiosity and, perhaps, an occasional peal of laughter. Thank you for allowing us to weather this academic storm with you.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Storm and Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name "Storm" and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.

As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.

In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, esteemed colleagues, to a whirlwind journey through the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis and nomenclature quirks. In this outlandish yet meticulously researched paper, we unravel the mesmerizing tale of the peculiar parallel universe where the propagation of the first name "Storm" appears to coalesce with the hydroelectric power generation in none other than the enchanting land of Kosovo.
Gird your loins, for we are about to steer through a squall of data points and gales of linguistic ponderings, all in pursuit of understanding the unfathomable connection between a name that evokes visions of tempestuous winds and the generation of sustainable energy. As we traverse this whimsical landscape, you may find yourself pondering the age-old question: "What do you call a storm that generates hydroelectric power? A hydro-storm!"
Our investigation delves into the realms of both sociology and energy economics, attempting to unfurl the enigmatic ties between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in the heartland of Kosovo. A word of warning: prepare for a sprinkling of data puns and a downpour of name-related humor, as we navigate the confluence of two seemingly disparate phenomena.
The very premise of this inquiry may elicit raised eyebrows and quizzical expressions, prompting the inevitable query: "What do you call a name-related study about hydroelectric power? A stormy statistical adventure!" But fear not, for we are not deterred by the unconventional and the unexpected; instead, we embrace the stormy seas of empirical investigation with fervor and whimsy.
Our remarkable findings, detailed in the abstract, unearth an undeniable correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in Kosovo, leaving us with an imperative to ponder the legendary query: "Why don't storms ever become good economists? They always make terrible forecasts!"
Illuminate your intellect and prepare for a deluge of revelatory insights as we embark on this droll yet insightful journey. The storm surge is upon us, and we are ready to brave the wild winds of academic exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Unveiling the climactic results of our gallant odyssey, we are thrilled to announce the emergence of a dazzling correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric energy generated in Kosovo. The correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 has left us feeling positively charged, like a lightning bolt of statistical significance. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8376892, suggesting that a whopping 83.77% of the variability in hydroelectric power generation can be explained by the prevalence of the name "Storm." It seems that the name "Storm" is not just a passing breeze, but a significant force to be reckoned with in the renewable energy landscape.
In true academically responsible fashion, we also uncovered a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the correlation between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power production is indeed statistically significant. The odds of this relationship occurring by mere chance are lower than a submarine in a sea of statistical veracity. It appears that the stormy moniker "Storm" is more than just a gust of wind; it holds a palpable sway over hydroelectric energy production in Kosovo.
Furthermore, our research team is eager to present Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually depicts the robust correlation between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo. Brace yourselves for a visual masterpiece that captures the electrifying nature of this unexpected relationship. It's certainly a plot twist worthy of a stormy, name-related adventure, wouldn't you agree?
So, there you have it, folks. The storm has spoken, and the winds of empirical evidence do blow in the favor of a captivating link between the first name "Storm" and hydroelectric power generation in Kosovo. It seems that the impact of a name can indeed reverberate through the currents of energy economics. As this paper draws to a close, we leave you with a final punny sentiment: "Why did the weather forecaster break up with the name 'Storm'? They just couldn't weather the emotional forecast!" Thank you for weathering the storm of our quirky investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our research has weathered the tumultuous seas of statistical analysis to reveal a remarkable connection between the prevalence of the name "Storm" and the generation of hydroelectric power in Kosovo. The electrifying correlation coefficient of 0.9152536 and a p-value of less than 0.01 indicate a storm of statistical significance that no umbrella can shield us from! It seems that "Storm" is making waves not only as a name but also as a force to be reckoned with in the realm of renewable energy production.

This study has shed light on the unexpected ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena can converge, leaving us to ponder the age-old question: "What do you call a hydroelectric Storm? A whirlwind of sustainable power!" The implications of this correlation are far from a mere drizzle; they pour down like a torrential downpour of thought-provoking realizations.

Our findings are as clear as a cloudless sky after a storm: there is an undeniable link between the name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo. It's almost as if the name itself conjures a tempest of energy generation! This revelation calls for a celebration akin to dancing in the rain, as it highlights the captivating interplay between nomenclature and energy economics.

As the rainclouds of our study dissipate, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. The storm has been weathered, and the data have spoken—sometimes, a name truly can influence the winds of change in unexpected ways. Thank you for embarking on this wild and whimsical journey with us, where the forecast is always filled with surprises!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Storm and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Storm and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Quirky Scientific Inquiries (AQSI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Storm Surge: A Quirky Investigation into the Relationship between the Popularity of the Name Storm and Hydroelectric Power Generation in Kosovo with an abstract of In this study, we embark on a whimsical yet rigorous exploration into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Storm" and the production of hydroelectric energy in the Balkan nation of Kosovo. Utilizing astute data analysis from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we discovered a surprising connection that may just blow you away.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9152536, with a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling a significant relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Storm" and the hydroelectric power output in Kosovo from 2008 to 2021. This unprecedented correlation may lead to a storm of discussions within the academic community, sparking pun-intended debates about the name's electrifying influence on energy generation.
As we delved into the data, it became clear that the surge in hydroelectric power production is not merely a tempest in a teapot; rather, it appears to be intricately linked to the prevailing social trend of naming newborns "Storm." This unexpected synergy between nomenclature and energy production serves as a gentle reminder that sometimes, even the most unconventional variables can have a thunderous impact on empirical relationships.
In conclusion, our research provides compelling evidence of a captivating association between the popularity of the first name "Storm" and the hydroelectric power generated in Kosovo, unleashing a flood of thought-provoking questions and electrifying puns in the realm of interdisciplinary studies.

ChatGPT:

"Storm" name popularity, hydroelectric power generation Kosovo, correlation name popularity energy production, impact of name "Storm" on hydroelectric power, social trend naming newborns "Storm," unconventional variables energy generation, relationship name "Storm" energy production, quirky correlation name "Storm" power generation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Storm
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Storm
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Storm

Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Kosovo in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo

Correlation r = 0.9152536 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8376892 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Storm) over the 14 years from 2008 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.4E-6. 0.0000044464441326979680000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00044% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 224,899 random variables You don't actually need 224 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Storm (Babies born)91888887107102121139174163177163229245
Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo (Billion kWh)0.0750.1190.1540.1040.0950.1420.1490.1390.2430.1770.270270.20790.2628260.300635




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([91,88,88,87,107,102,121,139,174,163,177,163,229,245,])
array_2 = np.array([0.075,0.119,0.154,0.104,0.095,0.142,0.149,0.139,0.243,0.177,0.27027,0.2079,0.262826,0.300635,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Storm"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Kosovo"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 3767 · Black Variable ID: 3636 · Red Variable ID: 23774
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0