about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,998 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Dusty and the second variable is Air pollution in Miami.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Less demand for personalized airbrushed license plates and truck decals resulted in fewer particles being released into the air during application.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a park in Miami with a clear skyline in the distance. The setting is serene with a fewer number of people named Dusty, resulting in significantly less dust storms and pollutants in the air. Show a peaceful, clean atmosphere with a gentle breeze and the city skyline visible in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art Futuristic Celtic art Brutalism A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the first name Dusty decreased, fewer people were named Dusty. As a result, there were fewer and less frequent dust storms in Miami, leading to a decrease in air pollution.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a park in Miami, there are fewer people with the name Dusty, and as a result, there are considerably fewer dust storms. The air is clearer, with fewer pollutants, and the city skyline is visible in the distance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a park in Miami, there are fewer people with the name Dusty, and as a result, there are considerably fewer dust storms. The air is clearer, with fewer pollutants, and the city skyline is visible in the distance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a park in Miami with a clear skyline in the distance. The setting is serene with a fewer number of people named Dusty, resulting in significantly less dust storms and pollutants in the air. Show a peaceful, clean atmosphere with a gentle breeze and the city skyline visible in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Dusty caused Air pollution in Miami to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami

Journal of Ecological Linguistics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8169307 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the study of environmental factors and their impact on various aspects of human life has gained significant attention. While the connection between air pollution and respiratory health has been extensively studied, the potential link between the popularity of first names and environmental conditions has received comparatively less focus. However, as researchers, we are not afraid to venture into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through dusty databases and pun-filled pathways.

The name "Dusty" has a certain rustic charm, evoking images of open plains and roving tumbleweeds. However, could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Our study dives into the dusty depths of data to unravel the potential connection between the presence of airborne particles and the frequency of the name Dusty in the bustling city of Miami. One might say we’re aiming to clear the air on this subject – pun intended!

As we sifted through decades of birth records and air quality measurements, we couldn't help but wonder: Is there a dusty connection between the popularity of the name Dusty and the environmental conditions in Miami, or are we just blowing hot air? Our findings suggest that there might, in fact, be a strong correlation between the two, raising questions about the influence of names on the atmospheric composition of a city.

In the words of a true dad joke enthusiast, "It seems that Dusty brings a whole new meaning to the term 'airborne'!" Perhaps there's more to a name than its linguistic significance, and our research endeavors to unravel the dusty mysteries surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.

Stay tuned as we embark on this delightful journey through the whimsical world of name popularity and air quality, with a dash of humor and a hint of scientific inquiry. After all, who says academic research can't be a breath of fresh air?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the study of environmental factors and their impact on various aspects of human life has gained significant attention. While the connection between air pollution and respiratory health has been extensively studied, the potential link between the popularity of first names and environmental conditions has received comparatively less focus. However, as researchers, we are not afraid to venture into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through dusty databases and pun-filled pathways.
The name "Dusty" has a certain rustic charm, evoking images of open plains and roving tumbleweeds. However, could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Our study dives into the dusty depths of data to unravel the potential connection between the presence of airborne particles and the frequency of the name Dusty in the bustling city of Miami. One might say we’re aiming to clear the air on this subject – pun intended!
As we sifted through decades of birth records and air quality measurements, we couldn't help but wonder: Is there a dusty connection between the popularity of the name Dusty and the environmental conditions in Miami, or are we just blowing hot air? Our findings suggest that there might, in fact, be a strong correlation between the two, raising questions about the influence of names on the atmospheric composition of a city.
In the words of a true dad joke enthusiast, "It seems that Dusty brings a whole new meaning to the term 'airborne'!" Perhaps there's more to a name than its linguistic significance, and our research endeavors to unravel the dusty mysteries surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.
Stay tuned as we embark on this delightful journey through the whimsical world of name popularity and air quality, with a dash of humor and a hint of scientific inquiry. After all, who says academic research can't be a breath of fresh air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in urban settings has drawn limited scholarly attention. However, a study by Smith et al. (2010) found a modest correlation between unique first names and environmental factors, opening the door to further investigation into this unexplored terrain. Do not worry, we are not about to leave you hanging like a loose particle in the wind – we are determined to fill this research vacuum with some refreshing insights.

In their work, Doe and Jones (2015) also examined the influence of first names on environmental phenomena and identified a potential link between popular first names and atmospheric conditions. Their study served as a springboard for our investigation, propelling us into the dusty realm of name-related air quality dynamics. As we dived deeper into this peculiar correlation, we could not help but wonder if there’s more than meets the dusty eye.

The integration of environmental dynamics with nomenclature has also been tangentially addressed in contemporary non-fiction works. "The Air We Breathe: Exploring the Intersection of Names and Nature" by Green (2019) delves into the curious connections between names and environmental influences, laying the groundwork for our quirky quest. Similarly, "The Names of the Wind: A Dusty Investigation" by Rothfuss (2007) provides a fictional yet thought-provoking exploration of the interconnectedness between names and atmospheric elements.

Returning to more serious fare, the correlation between first names and environmental conditions has also permeated popular culture and internet memes. The "Dusty Roads" meme, inspired by the classic song, humorously depicts the hypothetical journey of a person named Dusty through environmentally challenged landscapes, accentuating the whimsical aspects of our research subject.

In "Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami," we aim to contribute a breath of fresh air to the academic discussion by shedding light on the unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. As we embark on this peculiar journey, accompanied by a cloud of dad jokes, we strive to demonstrate that there is indeed more to a name than mere linguistic significance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the study of environmental factors and their impact on various aspects of human life has gained significant attention. While the connection between air pollution and respiratory health has been extensively studied, the potential link between the popularity of first names and environmental conditions has received comparatively less focus. However, as researchers, we are not afraid to venture into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through dusty databases and pun-filled pathways.
The name "Dusty" has a certain rustic charm, evoking images of open plains and roving tumbleweeds. However, could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Our study dives into the dusty depths of data to unravel the potential connection between the presence of airborne particles and the frequency of the name Dusty in the bustling city of Miami. One might say we’re aiming to clear the air on this subject – pun intended!
As we sifted through decades of birth records and air quality measurements, we couldn't help but wonder: Is there a dusty connection between the popularity of the name Dusty and the environmental conditions in Miami, or are we just blowing hot air? Our findings suggest that there might, in fact, be a strong correlation between the two, raising questions about the influence of names on the atmospheric composition of a city.
In the words of a true dad joke enthusiast, "It seems that Dusty brings a whole new meaning to the term 'airborne'!" Perhaps there's more to a name than its linguistic significance, and our research endeavors to unravel the dusty mysteries surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.
Stay tuned as we embark on this delightful journey through the whimsical world of name popularity and air quality, with a dash of humor and a hint of scientific inquiry. After all, who says academic research can't be a breath of fresh air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential relationship between the popularity of the first name Dusty and levels of air pollution in Miami, we employed a plethora of data mining techniques and statistical analyses that could knock the dust off any old database. Our data was primarily sourced from the US Social Security Administration, which contains records of baby names from 1980 to 2022, and the Environmental Protection Agency, which provides comprehensive air quality measurements for Miami during the same time period. We also scoured various internet sources, combing through online databases and archives to ensure the thoroughness of our dataset. It was quite the endeavor, but we were determined to leave no stone unturned, or should I say, no dusty particle unexamined!

After muddling through mountains of data, we constructed a time series dataset that captured the frequencies of the name Dusty alongside air quality indices in Miami. To bring some levity to the process, we couldn't resist making an air-tight dad joke: "It felt like we were sifting through the sands of time, but we weren't about to let this research blow away!"

Next, we enlisted the help of a range of statistical tools, including correlation analysis, time series modelling, and multivariate regression methods, to untangle the potential connection between the name Dusty and air pollution. It was like trying to clear the dust off an old bookshelf - a meticulous process that at times required a touch of lightheartedness to keep our spirits high.

In our quest to elucidate the link between the name Dusty and levels of airborne particles, we entertained the use of advanced algorithms and machine learning models to uncover any underlying patterns or anomalies. We aimed to approach the research with a sense of adventure, for after all, isn't the pursuit of knowledge a grand expedition through the unknown?

Finally, as we pieced together the findings of our analyses, we sought to present a comprehensive evaluation of the potential correlation between the name Dusty's popularity and air quality in Miami, providing an evidence-based argument that leaves no room for a dusty claim.

This methodology section has revealed more than just our research techniques; it has also brought to light the amusing nature of academic inquiry. As the saying goes, "When it comes to unraveling dusty mysteries, nothing beats a combination of data-driven methods and a sprinkle of humor!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8169307, r-squared of 0.6673757, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the study of environmental factors and their impact on various aspects of human life has gained significant attention. While the connection between air pollution and respiratory health has been extensively studied, the potential link between the popularity of first names and environmental conditions has received comparatively less focus. However, as researchers, we are not afraid to venture into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through dusty databases and pun-filled pathways.
The name "Dusty" has a certain rustic charm, evoking images of open plains and roving tumbleweeds. However, could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Our study dives into the dusty depths of data to unravel the potential connection between the presence of airborne particles and the frequency of the name Dusty in the bustling city of Miami. One might say we’re aiming to clear the air on this subject – pun intended!
As we sifted through decades of birth records and air quality measurements, we couldn't help but wonder: Is there a dusty connection between the popularity of the name Dusty and the environmental conditions in Miami, or are we just blowing hot air? Our findings suggest that there might, in fact, be a strong correlation between the two, raising questions about the influence of names on the atmospheric composition of a city.
In the words of a true dad joke enthusiast, "It seems that Dusty brings a whole new meaning to the term 'airborne'!" Perhaps there's more to a name than its linguistic significance, and our research endeavors to unravel the dusty mysteries surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.
Stay tuned as we embark on this delightful journey through the whimsical world of name popularity and air quality, with a dash of humor and a hint of scientific inquiry. After all, who says academic research can't be a breath of fresh air?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded compelling results. Our investigation into the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami over the period of 1980 to 2022 revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8169307. This positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name Dusty increased, so did the air pollution in Miami. It seems that the name Dusty isn't just leaving traces in the birth records but also in the atmospheric composition of the city!

The r-squared value of 0.6673757 further bolstered the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 66.7% of the variation in air pollution levels in Miami could be explained by the popularity of the name Dusty. Our results paint a compelling picture of the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions, further cementing the intriguing nature of our findings.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the correlation. This finding provides strong evidence that the association between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami is not just a result of random chance. It appears that there's more to Dusty than meets the eye, as our research unearths an unexpected link between a popular name and atmospheric composition.

Our study also presents a scatterplot (Fig. 1), visually illustrating the strong correlation identified between the popularity of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. The figure showcases the unmistakable trend, demonstrating the co-occurrence of increasing Dusty popularity and rising air pollution levels over the decades. It seems that the wind isn't the only thing carrying dust in Miami – Dusty is making quite an impression in the city's air quality too!

In the immortal words of a proud dad joke connoisseur, "It looks like Dusty is blowing a breath of fresh correlation into the dusty world of name popularity and environmental factors!" Our results not only highlight the empirical evidence of this unexpected relationship but also serve as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections can offer valuable insights when viewed through a lighthearted lens.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in urban settings has drawn limited scholarly attention. However, a study by Smith et al. (2010) found a modest correlation between unique first names and environmental factors, opening the door to further investigation into this unexplored terrain. Do not worry, we are not about to leave you hanging like a loose particle in the wind – we are determined to fill this research vacuum with some refreshing insights.
In their work, Doe and Jones (2015) also examined the influence of first names on environmental phenomena and identified a potential link between popular first names and atmospheric conditions. Their study served as a springboard for our investigation, propelling us into the dusty realm of name-related air quality dynamics. As we dived deeper into this peculiar correlation, we could not help but wonder if there’s more than meets the dusty eye.
The integration of environmental dynamics with nomenclature has also been tangentially addressed in contemporary non-fiction works. "The Air We Breathe: Exploring the Intersection of Names and Nature" by Green (2019) delves into the curious connections between names and environmental influences, laying the groundwork for our quirky quest. Similarly, "The Names of the Wind: A Dusty Investigation" by Rothfuss (2007) provides a fictional yet thought-provoking exploration of the interconnectedness between names and atmospheric elements.
Returning to more serious fare, the correlation between first names and environmental conditions has also permeated popular culture and internet memes. The "Dusty Roads" meme, inspired by the classic song, humorously depicts the hypothetical journey of a person named Dusty through environmentally challenged landscapes, accentuating the whimsical aspects of our research subject.
In "Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami," we aim to contribute a breath of fresh air to the academic discussion by shedding light on the unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. As we embark on this peculiar journey, accompanied by a cloud of dad jokes, we strive to demonstrate that there is indeed more to a name than mere linguistic significance.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded compelling results. Our investigation into the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami over the period of 1980 to 2022 revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8169307. This positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name Dusty increased, so did the air pollution in Miami. It seems that the name Dusty isn't just leaving traces in the birth records but also in the atmospheric composition of the city!
The r-squared value of 0.6673757 further bolstered the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 66.7% of the variation in air pollution levels in Miami could be explained by the popularity of the name Dusty. Our results paint a compelling picture of the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions, further cementing the intriguing nature of our findings.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the correlation. This finding provides strong evidence that the association between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami is not just a result of random chance. It appears that there's more to Dusty than meets the eye, as our research unearths an unexpected link between a popular name and atmospheric composition.
Our study also presents a scatterplot (Fig. 1), visually illustrating the strong correlation identified between the popularity of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. The figure showcases the unmistakable trend, demonstrating the co-occurrence of increasing Dusty popularity and rising air pollution levels over the decades. It seems that the wind isn't the only thing carrying dust in Miami – Dusty is making quite an impression in the city's air quality too!
In the immortal words of a proud dad joke connoisseur, "It looks like Dusty is blowing a breath of fresh correlation into the dusty world of name popularity and environmental factors!" Our results not only highlight the empirical evidence of this unexpected relationship but also serve as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections can offer valuable insights when viewed through a lighthearted lens.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study offers compelling evidence supporting the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307 serves as a testament to the surprising influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions. It appears that Dusty's impact extends beyond social circles, leaving an indelible mark in Miami's atmospheric composition. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we couldn't help but chuckle and offer our research findings with a side order of dad jokes for good measure.

Building on the foundation laid by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), our results provide empirical support for the hypothesis that the frequency of the name Dusty is intertwined with air pollution dynamics in Miami. It seems that as Dusty's popularity soared, it brought with it a gust of dusty air, creating an unexpected yet robust relationship between a moniker and atmospheric conditions. Our findings not only mirror these prior studies but also blow some fresh air into the dusty realm of name-related environmental phenomena.

The striking r-squared value of 0.6673757 further emphasizes the substantial influence of the name Dusty on air pollution levels in Miami. This statistical indicator underscores that a significant portion, approximately 66.7%, of the variation in air pollution levels can be attributed to the popularity dynamics of Dusty. It turns out that Dusty isn't just making waves among parents naming their bundles of joy but also among atmospheric particles, leading to a breath of fresh insights into the interconnectedness of human nomenclature and environmental factors.

Furthermore, the statistical significance denoted by the p-value of less than 0.01 reaffirms the validity of our findings. It appears that the relationship between Dusty's popularity and air pollution levels in Miami isn't just a result of chance; there's a substantial likelihood of a meaningful association. It seems Dusty's impact on Miami's air quality isn't just a dust in the wind – it's a carefully crafted composition of intriguing connections between human naming preferences and environmental dynamics.

In line with our quirky approach to this unusual research topic, the scatterplot presented in Figure 1 vividly illustrates the captivating correlation between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. It's clearer than the Florida sky that Dusty's popularity and Miami's air pollution levels march in harmony, painting a whimsical yet compelling picture of the unexpected influence of a first name on a city's environmental characteristics. It seems that the name Dusty isn't just a linguistic label but a potential atmospheric influencer in the Magic City.

In summary, our research findings not only uphold the prior studies but also lend credence to the unanticipated relationship between a popular name and the environmental ambiance of a vibrant city. As we bask in the dust-filled glory of our findings, we hope to reignite a lighthearted perspective within the scholarly domain and remind our esteemed colleagues that amidst the sediment of serious research, a sprinkling of dad jokes can add a breath of levity and humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Dusty and Air pollution in Miami. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.

Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?

To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the study of environmental factors and their impact on various aspects of human life has gained significant attention. While the connection between air pollution and respiratory health has been extensively studied, the potential link between the popularity of first names and environmental conditions has received comparatively less focus. However, as researchers, we are not afraid to venture into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through dusty databases and pun-filled pathways.
The name "Dusty" has a certain rustic charm, evoking images of open plains and roving tumbleweeds. However, could there be more to this name than meets the eye? Our study dives into the dusty depths of data to unravel the potential connection between the presence of airborne particles and the frequency of the name Dusty in the bustling city of Miami. One might say we’re aiming to clear the air on this subject – pun intended!
As we sifted through decades of birth records and air quality measurements, we couldn't help but wonder: Is there a dusty connection between the popularity of the name Dusty and the environmental conditions in Miami, or are we just blowing hot air? Our findings suggest that there might, in fact, be a strong correlation between the two, raising questions about the influence of names on the atmospheric composition of a city.
In the words of a true dad joke enthusiast, "It seems that Dusty brings a whole new meaning to the term 'airborne'!" Perhaps there's more to a name than its linguistic significance, and our research endeavors to unravel the dusty mysteries surrounding the interplay between nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.
Stay tuned as we embark on this delightful journey through the whimsical world of name popularity and air quality, with a dash of humor and a hint of scientific inquiry. After all, who says academic research can't be a breath of fresh air?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency yielded compelling results. Our investigation into the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami over the period of 1980 to 2022 revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8169307. This positive correlation suggests that as the popularity of the name Dusty increased, so did the air pollution in Miami. It seems that the name Dusty isn't just leaving traces in the birth records but also in the atmospheric composition of the city!
The r-squared value of 0.6673757 further bolstered the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 66.7% of the variation in air pollution levels in Miami could be explained by the popularity of the name Dusty. Our results paint a compelling picture of the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions, further cementing the intriguing nature of our findings.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the statistical significance of the correlation. This finding provides strong evidence that the association between the frequency of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami is not just a result of random chance. It appears that there's more to Dusty than meets the eye, as our research unearths an unexpected link between a popular name and atmospheric composition.
Our study also presents a scatterplot (Fig. 1), visually illustrating the strong correlation identified between the popularity of the name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami. The figure showcases the unmistakable trend, demonstrating the co-occurrence of increasing Dusty popularity and rising air pollution levels over the decades. It seems that the wind isn't the only thing carrying dust in Miami – Dusty is making quite an impression in the city's air quality too!
In the immortal words of a proud dad joke connoisseur, "It looks like Dusty is blowing a breath of fresh correlation into the dusty world of name popularity and environmental factors!" Our results not only highlight the empirical evidence of this unexpected relationship but also serve as a reminder that even the most unlikely connections can offer valuable insights when viewed through a lighthearted lens.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our exploration of the correlation between the popularity of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in Miami has illuminated a dusty path towards a whimsical understanding of nomenclature and environmental phenomena. Our findings have shed light on the unexpected connection between the airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere and the rising popularity of the name Dusty, blowing away any doubts about the intrinsic relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we draw the curtains on this peculiar investigation, we can't help but exclaim, "It seems that Dusty has really left a 'particulate' impression on Miami's air quality!" Our study not only unravels the statistical significance of this correlation but also brings a touch of levity to the often-serious realm of academic research – after all, who says scientific inquiry can't be a breezy affair?

With a firm nod to the undeniable dad joke enthusiast, we affirm that our research has provided concrete evidence that the name Dusty is more than just a moniker; it is a dynamic force that leaves its mark not only in birth records but also in the atmospheric composition of a bustling city. Our scatterplot serves as a visual testament to this unique relationship, showcasing the harmonious rise of Dusty popularity and air pollution levels over the years, much like a dance between a name and the noxious fumes of modern life.

Nonetheless, we must assert that no further research is needed in this area - not because we've exhausted the topic, but because no amount of academic exploration can truly capture the magnitude of the Dad joke potential here. It's a breath of fresh air in the dusty world of research.

In the spirit of lighthearted inquiry, we invite future researchers to embrace the unconventional and to explore the uncharted territories of whimsy and wonder, confident that even the most unexpected correlations can offer valuable insights when viewed through a playful lens. After all, who's to say that academic inquiry can't be a breath of fresh air?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Linguistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Name-Environment Research and Analysis (INERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Dusty Name, Dusty Air: The Correlation between the Popularity of the Name Dusty and Air Pollution in Miami with an abstract of In this study, we embark on an exploration of the relationship between the frequency of the first name Dusty and air pollution levels in the sunny city of Miami. While this may seem like a dusty topic, our research aims to shed light on the potential association between the two seemingly unrelated variables. Our data, sourced from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, covers the years 1980 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the trend.
Our findings reveal a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8169307, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong statistical significance. This suggests that there might be more than just dust in the wind when it comes to the relationship between the name Dusty and the presence of airborne particles in Miami's atmosphere. As we delve into this peculiar correlation, we cannot help but ponder: Is it possible that the environmental impact of the name Dusty extends beyond mere dust?
To further illustrate the gravity of our results, we can't help but crack a dad joke, "It seems that Dusty has been leaving more than just footprints in the Miami air!" This study serves to not only provide data-driven insights into the peculiar correlation between a popular name and environmental factors but also to inject a dash of humor into the sometimes dusty realm of academic research.

ChatGPT:

"Dusty name" "air pollution Miami" correlation, Dusty name popularity Miami, "name Dusty" environmental impact, air pollution Dusty correlation, "Dusty name" statistical significance, US Social Security Administration data, Environmental Protection Agency air pollution data, Dusty name frequency analysis, name Dusty trending years, airborne particles Miami atmosphere, Dusty name correlation coefficient, Dusty name p-value, environmental impact of name Dusty, "Dusty name" airborne particles, humorous academic research, academic study correlation name Dusty, correlation between name Dusty and air pollution.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Dusty
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Dusty
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Dusty

Air pollution in Miami
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Miami

Correlation r = 0.8169307 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6673757 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Miami) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Dusty) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-11. 0.0000000000237611744550049800
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 2.4E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 42,085,461,806 random variables You don't actually need 42 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Dusty (Babies born)7848306314384224464455064383083042231752633252832362241801701551301221131141279799818775476662566451444650534764
Air pollution in Miami (Bad air quality days)5.191264.383561.917810.8219180.5464481.369861.643841.643842.459021.917810.54794501.09291.917810.5479450.8219180.2732240.5479452.465752.191780.2732240.5479450.5479450.2739730.8196720.2739730.5479450.8219180.546448000.27397300000.275482000000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([784,830,631,438,422,446,445,506,438,308,304,223,175,263,325,283,236,224,180,170,155,130,122,113,114,127,97,99,81,87,75,47,66,62,56,64,51,44,46,50,53,47,64,])
array_2 = np.array([5.19126,4.38356,1.91781,0.821918,0.546448,1.36986,1.64384,1.64384,2.45902,1.91781,0.547945,0,1.0929,1.91781,0.547945,0.821918,0.273224,0.547945,2.46575,2.19178,0.273224,0.547945,0.547945,0.273973,0.819672,0.273973,0.547945,0.821918,0.546448,0,0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.275482,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Dusty"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Miami"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 3998 · Black Variable ID: 3489 · Red Variable ID: 20894
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0