about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,196 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Jet fuel used in United States and the second variable is Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies.  The chart goes from 1993 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the jets soar through the skies, they unknowingly create subtle air currents that carry baseballs in the desired direction, giving the Colorado Rockies an unexpected home run advantage. It's a classic case of high-flying interference leading to a whole new ball game!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a sprawling, mountainous landscape reminiscent of Skyrim, with a clear blue sky as a backdrop. In the foreground, overlay sleek jets streaking through the air, leaving distinct trails of jet fuel. Meanwhile, on a meticulously manicured baseball field, the Colorado Rockies players jubilantly round the bases, with a visible scoreboard displaying a growing number of runs. The unintended assistance from the air currents created by the passing jets should be subtly implied through the joyous reactions of the players. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic Magic realism Vaporwave Hyper-realistic A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies, in the following situation: As the jets soar through the skies, they unknowingly create subtle air currents that carry baseballs in the desired direction, giving the Colorado Rockies an unexpected home run advantage. It's a classic case of high-flying interference leading to a whole new ball game!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Against a clear blue sky, sleek jets streak through the air leaving trails of jet fuel behind. Meanwhile, on a baseball field, the Colorado Rockies players joyously round the bases as multiple runs are racked up on the scoreboard, thanks to the unintended assistance from the air currents created by the passing jets.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: Against a clear blue sky, sleek jets streak through the air leaving trails of jet fuel behind. Meanwhile, on a baseball field, the Colorado Rockies players joyously round the bases as multiple runs are racked up on the scoreboard, thanks to the unintended assistance from the air currents created by the passing jets. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a sprawling, mountainous landscape reminiscent of Skyrim, with a clear blue sky as a backdrop. In the foreground, overlay sleek jets streaking through the air, leaving distinct trails of jet fuel. Meanwhile, on a meticulously manicured baseball field, the Colorado Rockies players jubilantly round the bases, with a visible scoreboard displaying a growing number of runs. The unintended assistance from the air currents created by the passing jets should be subtly implied through the joyous reactions of the players.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Jet fuel used in United States caused Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Energy Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for 1993 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the delightful, whimsical world of academic research! Our journey into the peculiar correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has been nothing short of an adventure. In the often serious realm of statistical analysis, we were driven by an insatiable curiosity to explore the junction where the high-flying world of aviation intersects with the exhilarating sport of baseball. Combining a dash of statistical rigor with a generous sprinkle of levity, we embarked upon this charming endeavor to uncover the surprising relationship between two seemingly disparate entities. The result? A delightful romp through the corridors of data analysis that left our team simultaneously scratching our heads and chuckling at the unexpected twists and turns that emerged from our investigation.

As we delved into the statistical rabbit hole, we could not help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our inquiry. Who would have thought that the soaring trajectory of jet fuel consumption could have any bearing on the home runs belted at Coors Field? Yet, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and a healthy sense of humor, we found ourselves navigating the turbulent air currents of data analysis with a lighthearted yet determined spirit. Our quest was to unearth the hidden secrets of this peculiar relationship, all while maintaining a wry smile and an unshakeable commitment to academic excellence.

Join us on this whimsical escapade as we untangle the statistical web of jet fuel and runs scored, pitting the soaring fuel demand against the thunderous crack of a well-struck baseball. Our findings are as surprising as they are amusing, and we invite our fellow academics to don their thinking caps and their sense of humor as we embark on this gloriously whimsical expedition into the heart of statistical exploration. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, grab a bag of peanuts, and prepare for a journey that is as statistically rigorous as it is delightfully absurd. Welcome to the charmingly quirky world of jet fuel and the Colorado Rockies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful, whimsical world of academic research! Our journey into the peculiar correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has been nothing short of an adventure. In the often serious realm of statistical analysis, we were driven by an insatiable curiosity to explore the junction where the high-flying world of aviation intersects with the exhilarating sport of baseball. Combining a dash of statistical rigor with a generous sprinkle of levity, we embarked upon this charming endeavor to uncover the surprising relationship between two seemingly disparate entities. The result? A delightful romp through the corridors of data analysis that left our team simultaneously scratching our heads and chuckling at the unexpected twists and turns that emerged from our investigation.
As we delved into the statistical rabbit hole, we could not help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our inquiry. Who would have thought that the soaring trajectory of jet fuel consumption could have any bearing on the home runs belted at Coors Field? Yet, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and a healthy sense of humor, we found ourselves navigating the turbulent air currents of data analysis with a lighthearted yet determined spirit. Our quest was to unearth the hidden secrets of this peculiar relationship, all while maintaining a wry smile and an unshakeable commitment to academic excellence.
Join us on this whimsical escapade as we untangle the statistical web of jet fuel and runs scored, pitting the soaring fuel demand against the thunderous crack of a well-struck baseball. Our findings are as surprising as they are amusing, and we invite our fellow academics to don their thinking caps and their sense of humor as we embark on this gloriously whimsical expedition into the heart of statistical exploration. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, grab a bag of peanuts, and prepare for a journey that is as statistically rigorous as it is delightfully absurd. Welcome to the charmingly quirky world of jet fuel and the Colorado Rockies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of obscure statistical correlations, the connection between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has remained an enigmatic enigma, shrouded in whimsy and veiled in statistical mirth. Smith and Doe (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of energy consumption patterns in major league baseball stadiums, albeit with a focus on electricity usage rather than aviation fuel. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the intricacies of baseball statistics, but made no mention of the high-flying fuel that powers transcontinental flights.

Turning to the hallowed halls of non-fiction literature, "Fueling the Mind: A Comprehensive Guide to Aviation Energy" by Aviation Enthusiast Society and "The Art of Scoring: Unlocking the Secrets of Baseball Analytics" by Stat Guru provide invaluable insight into the respective realms of aviation fuel and baseball statistics. Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Jet Fuel Mystery" by Arthur Conandoyle and "Home Run High: A Tale of the Statistical Slugger" by Homer Runnerson offer narrative escapades that, while not directly addressing our research question, certainly capture the essence of our whimsical inquiry.

Moreover, it is imperative not to overlook the pivotal influence of childhood television programming on the formative minds of researchers. "The Jetsons," a quintessentially whimsical cartoon chronicling the futuristic escapades of a family who may or may not have dabbled in experimental aerodynamics, provides a lighthearted perspective on the potential intersections of jet fuel and everyday life. Additionally, "Rocky and Bullwinkle," featuring the misadventures of a plucky squirrel and a well-meaning moose, albeit not directly relevant, has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on the collective consciousness of this research team.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com . You used data from 1993 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful, whimsical world of academic research! Our journey into the peculiar correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has been nothing short of an adventure. In the often serious realm of statistical analysis, we were driven by an insatiable curiosity to explore the junction where the high-flying world of aviation intersects with the exhilarating sport of baseball. Combining a dash of statistical rigor with a generous sprinkle of levity, we embarked upon this charming endeavor to uncover the surprising relationship between two seemingly disparate entities. The result? A delightful romp through the corridors of data analysis that left our team simultaneously scratching our heads and chuckling at the unexpected twists and turns that emerged from our investigation.
As we delved into the statistical rabbit hole, we could not help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our inquiry. Who would have thought that the soaring trajectory of jet fuel consumption could have any bearing on the home runs belted at Coors Field? Yet, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and a healthy sense of humor, we found ourselves navigating the turbulent air currents of data analysis with a lighthearted yet determined spirit. Our quest was to unearth the hidden secrets of this peculiar relationship, all while maintaining a wry smile and an unshakeable commitment to academic excellence.
Join us on this whimsical escapade as we untangle the statistical web of jet fuel and runs scored, pitting the soaring fuel demand against the thunderous crack of a well-struck baseball. Our findings are as surprising as they are amusing, and we invite our fellow academics to don their thinking caps and their sense of humor as we embark on this gloriously whimsical expedition into the heart of statistical exploration. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, grab a bag of peanuts, and prepare for a journey that is as statistically rigorous as it is delightfully absurd. Welcome to the charmingly quirky world of jet fuel and the Colorado Rockies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our delightful quest of unraveling the mysterious connection between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies, our research team employed a blend of statistical analysis, data collection, and a healthy dose of whimsy. While the concept of such a correlation may seem as fantastical as a unicorn in left field, we approached our methodology with the utmost seriousness, coupled with a twinkle in our eyes and a nod to the absurdity of the endeavor.

Data Collection:
First and foremost, our team scoured the vast expanse of the internet to gather data from the Energy Information Administration for jet fuel consumption in the United States. The EIA provided us with a treasure trove of information spanning from 1993 to 2022. Our pursuit for the peculiar led us down the winding digital pathways of energy statistics, where we meticulously recorded the gallons of jet fuel consumed, all the while marveling at the unlikely journey that had led us to this point.

In parallel to our energy odyssey, we turned our attention to the hallowed grounds of Baseball-Reference.com. This repository of baseball statistics, shimmering with the glory of home runs and base hits, supplied us with the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies for the same time period. As we danced through the virtual baseball diamond of data, we marveled at the sheer whimsy of our quest - marrying the seriousness of research with the riotous joy of America's favorite pastime.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our treasure trove of data, we let loose our statistical wizards to conjure the enchanting formulae and algorithms necessary to uncover any hint of correlation between jet fuel consumption and runs scored. Our team deftly employed regression analysis, cross-correlation methods, and time series modeling to reveal the hidden dance between the consumption of jet fuel and the resounding crack of the bat at Coors Field.

We must confess that amongst the piles of spreadsheets, abacuses, and the occasional cackling laughter, our endeavor was accompanied by an unquenchable sense of whimsy. After all, who could resist the urge to crack a statisti-calculus joke amidst the solemn corridors of data analysis?

Ethical Considerations:
As we spiraled deeper into the intricate web of numbers and trends, we maintained a steadfast commitment to academic integrity and ethical research conduct. Our exploration may have been peppered with chuckles and raised eyebrows, but our dedication to upholding the principles of scholarly inquiry remained unwavering.

In summary, our methodology teetered on the precipice between rigorous statistical analysis and the whimsical allure of unearthing the unexpected. Our journey through the data labyrinth was a riotous tapestry of methodological wizardry and an unyielding affection for the absurd. As we present our findings, we invite the academic community to join us in celebrating the sheer delight that can be found in the unlikeliest of research pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com .

For the time period 1993 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7417091, r-squared of 0.5501324, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the delightful, whimsical world of academic research! Our journey into the peculiar correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has been nothing short of an adventure. In the often serious realm of statistical analysis, we were driven by an insatiable curiosity to explore the junction where the high-flying world of aviation intersects with the exhilarating sport of baseball. Combining a dash of statistical rigor with a generous sprinkle of levity, we embarked upon this charming endeavor to uncover the surprising relationship between two seemingly disparate entities. The result? A delightful romp through the corridors of data analysis that left our team simultaneously scratching our heads and chuckling at the unexpected twists and turns that emerged from our investigation.
As we delved into the statistical rabbit hole, we could not help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our inquiry. Who would have thought that the soaring trajectory of jet fuel consumption could have any bearing on the home runs belted at Coors Field? Yet, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and a healthy sense of humor, we found ourselves navigating the turbulent air currents of data analysis with a lighthearted yet determined spirit. Our quest was to unearth the hidden secrets of this peculiar relationship, all while maintaining a wry smile and an unshakeable commitment to academic excellence.
Join us on this whimsical escapade as we untangle the statistical web of jet fuel and runs scored, pitting the soaring fuel demand against the thunderous crack of a well-struck baseball. Our findings are as surprising as they are amusing, and we invite our fellow academics to don their thinking caps and their sense of humor as we embark on this gloriously whimsical expedition into the heart of statistical exploration. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, grab a bag of peanuts, and prepare for a journey that is as statistically rigorous as it is delightfully absurd. Welcome to the charmingly quirky world of jet fuel and the Colorado Rockies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our heartfelt journey into the whimsical realm of statistical analysis has yielded truly enchanting results. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. The correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and an r-squared value of 0.5501324 left our research team both bewildered and amused. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the unexpectedly strong link between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In support of our findings, we present Fig. 1, a visually striking scatterplot that vividly portrays the substantial correlation between jet fuel usage and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. This delightful visual aid perfectly encapsulates the remarkable relationship we uncovered, inviting readers to marvel at the whimsical nature of our discovery.

It is truly remarkable that the soaring heights of jet fuel consumption can coincide with the thunderous crack of a bat at Coors Field, producing a statistical symphony of sorts. As we present these findings with a twinkle in our eyes and a touch of astonishment, we cannot help but savor the absurdity of this correlation. While this result is undoubtedly whimsical, we approach it with the utmost seriousness, recognizing the whimsy that can be found in the most unexpected of places within the realm of academic inquiry.

Our research not only illuminates this peculiar connection but also demonstrates the unparalleled joy that can be derived from statistical exploration, even in the most unexpected and unconventional pairings. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in celebrating the delightful confluence of data, humor, and statistical insight as we continue to unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Indeed, the world of academic research is as enchanting as it is rigorous, and our findings serve as a testament to the extraordinary and often comical discoveries that can be made through the lens of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of obscure statistical correlations, the connection between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has remained an enigmatic enigma, shrouded in whimsy and veiled in statistical mirth. Smith and Doe (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of energy consumption patterns in major league baseball stadiums, albeit with a focus on electricity usage rather than aviation fuel. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the intricacies of baseball statistics, but made no mention of the high-flying fuel that powers transcontinental flights.
Turning to the hallowed halls of non-fiction literature, "Fueling the Mind: A Comprehensive Guide to Aviation Energy" by Aviation Enthusiast Society and "The Art of Scoring: Unlocking the Secrets of Baseball Analytics" by Stat Guru provide invaluable insight into the respective realms of aviation fuel and baseball statistics. Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Jet Fuel Mystery" by Arthur Conandoyle and "Home Run High: A Tale of the Statistical Slugger" by Homer Runnerson offer narrative escapades that, while not directly addressing our research question, certainly capture the essence of our whimsical inquiry.
Moreover, it is imperative not to overlook the pivotal influence of childhood television programming on the formative minds of researchers. "The Jetsons," a quintessentially whimsical cartoon chronicling the futuristic escapades of a family who may or may not have dabbled in experimental aerodynamics, provides a lighthearted perspective on the potential intersections of jet fuel and everyday life. Additionally, "Rocky and Bullwinkle," featuring the misadventures of a plucky squirrel and a well-meaning moose, albeit not directly relevant, has undoubtedly left an indelible mark on the collective consciousness of this research team.

[[RESULTS]]
Our heartfelt journey into the whimsical realm of statistical analysis has yielded truly enchanting results. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. The correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and an r-squared value of 0.5501324 left our research team both bewildered and amused. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the unexpectedly strong link between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In support of our findings, we present Fig. 1, a visually striking scatterplot that vividly portrays the substantial correlation between jet fuel usage and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. This delightful visual aid perfectly encapsulates the remarkable relationship we uncovered, inviting readers to marvel at the whimsical nature of our discovery.
It is truly remarkable that the soaring heights of jet fuel consumption can coincide with the thunderous crack of a bat at Coors Field, producing a statistical symphony of sorts. As we present these findings with a twinkle in our eyes and a touch of astonishment, we cannot help but savor the absurdity of this correlation. While this result is undoubtedly whimsical, we approach it with the utmost seriousness, recognizing the whimsy that can be found in the most unexpected of places within the realm of academic inquiry.
Our research not only illuminates this peculiar connection but also demonstrates the unparalleled joy that can be derived from statistical exploration, even in the most unexpected and unconventional pairings. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in celebrating the delightful confluence of data, humor, and statistical insight as we continue to unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Indeed, the world of academic research is as enchanting as it is rigorous, and our findings serve as a testament to the extraordinary and often comical discoveries that can be made through the lens of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have shed light on the unexpectedly buoyant relationship between jet fuel used in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. It's as though the Rockies were reaching for the stars, propelled not just by their athletic prowess but also by the high-flying fuel coursing through the nation's aviation hubs, fueling their spirited performance on the diamond.

Our journey into this charismatic correlation aligns with the outlandish and offbeat nature of statistical inquiry. As we ventured down this statistical rabbit hole, we found ourselves at the intersection of grandiose flight and the thunderous roar of a ballpark crowd. The results we've unearthed not only present an amusing spectacle but also contribute to the quirky and unconventional cornerstones of academic curiosity.

In revisiting the literature review, it's clear that while our inquiry initially seemed to belong to the realm of the surreal, it now stands anchored in tangible data. The references to "The Jetsons" and "Rocky and Bullwinkle" in our literature review, seemingly lighthearted digressions, now hold a remarkable degree of relevance in light of our findings. The fictional exploits of characters dabbling in aerodynamics and statistical escapades have set the stage for our own whimsical journey into aviation fuel and baseball runs. It's almost as if our research follows a narrative arc worthy of both a Shakespearean comedy and a Monty Python sketch.

Further bolstering our findings, we note the resounding echo of our results in the works of Smith and Doe (2020) and Jones et al. (2015), who explored related but tangential aspects of energy consumption and baseball statistics. It appears that our research has flown into uncharted territories, establishing a correlation so substantial that it beckons the scholarly community to join us in this lighthearted yet earnest pursuit of knowledge.

As we savor the eccentric convergence of jet fuel and homers at Coors Field, we are reminded that the pursuit of knowledge can be as entertaining as it is enlightening. Our findings not only dance in the realm of the unexpected but also underscore the whimsical spirit that underlies academic inquiry, demonstrating that even the most improbable pairings can yield valuable insights.

In this discussion, we invite our academic peers to revel in the joviality of our research while acknowledging the serious implications of our findings. After all, in the grand tapestry of academic inquiry, it's the unexpected yet substantial correlations that add a touch of whimsy to the serious business of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Jet fuel used in United States and Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful, whimsical world of academic research! Our journey into the peculiar correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies has been nothing short of an adventure. In the often serious realm of statistical analysis, we were driven by an insatiable curiosity to explore the junction where the high-flying world of aviation intersects with the exhilarating sport of baseball. Combining a dash of statistical rigor with a generous sprinkle of levity, we embarked upon this charming endeavor to uncover the surprising relationship between two seemingly disparate entities. The result? A delightful romp through the corridors of data analysis that left our team simultaneously scratching our heads and chuckling at the unexpected twists and turns that emerged from our investigation.
As we delved into the statistical rabbit hole, we could not help but marvel at the sheer audacity of our inquiry. Who would have thought that the soaring trajectory of jet fuel consumption could have any bearing on the home runs belted at Coors Field? Yet, armed with our trusty spreadsheets and a healthy sense of humor, we found ourselves navigating the turbulent air currents of data analysis with a lighthearted yet determined spirit. Our quest was to unearth the hidden secrets of this peculiar relationship, all while maintaining a wry smile and an unshakeable commitment to academic excellence.
Join us on this whimsical escapade as we untangle the statistical web of jet fuel and runs scored, pitting the soaring fuel demand against the thunderous crack of a well-struck baseball. Our findings are as surprising as they are amusing, and we invite our fellow academics to don their thinking caps and their sense of humor as we embark on this gloriously whimsical expedition into the heart of statistical exploration. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, grab a bag of peanuts, and prepare for a journey that is as statistically rigorous as it is delightfully absurd. Welcome to the charmingly quirky world of jet fuel and the Colorado Rockies.

[[RESULTS]]
Our heartfelt journey into the whimsical realm of statistical analysis has yielded truly enchanting results. We discovered a remarkably robust correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. The correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and an r-squared value of 0.5501324 left our research team both bewildered and amused. Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 further solidified the unexpectedly strong link between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In support of our findings, we present Fig. 1, a visually striking scatterplot that vividly portrays the substantial correlation between jet fuel usage and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. This delightful visual aid perfectly encapsulates the remarkable relationship we uncovered, inviting readers to marvel at the whimsical nature of our discovery.
It is truly remarkable that the soaring heights of jet fuel consumption can coincide with the thunderous crack of a bat at Coors Field, producing a statistical symphony of sorts. As we present these findings with a twinkle in our eyes and a touch of astonishment, we cannot help but savor the absurdity of this correlation. While this result is undoubtedly whimsical, we approach it with the utmost seriousness, recognizing the whimsy that can be found in the most unexpected of places within the realm of academic inquiry.
Our research not only illuminates this peculiar connection but also demonstrates the unparalleled joy that can be derived from statistical exploration, even in the most unexpected and unconventional pairings. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in celebrating the delightful confluence of data, humor, and statistical insight as we continue to unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. Indeed, the world of academic research is as enchanting as it is rigorous, and our findings serve as a testament to the extraordinary and often comical discoveries that can be made through the lens of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our delightful romp through the whimsical world of statistical analysis has led us to the enchanting revelation of a substantial correlation between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies. It seems that as the jets soar through the skies, the baseballs are also flying in a harmonious statistical symphony. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and the p-value of less than 0.01 have left us simultaneously scratching our heads and applauding the statistical absurdity. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 vividly captures this unexpected relationship, inviting us to marvel at the whimsical nature of our findings.

As we reflect on this curious correlation, we cannot help but chuckle at the delightful incongruity of our discovery. It seems that the high-flying world of aviation and the exhilarating sport of baseball have indeed found common ground in the realm of statistical analysis. Our research not only sheds light on this surprising connection but also serves as a testament to the charm and merriment that can be found within the confounding corridors of academic inquiry.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a hearty chuckle, we invite our esteemed colleagues to revel in the delightful absurdity of this discovery. It is a whimsical testament to the joy that can be derived from statistical exploration, even in the most unexpected and unconventional pairings. As we bid adieu to this zany excursion into statistical analysis, we assert with utmost seriousness and a healthy dose of humor that no further research is needed in this outlandishly delightful area of inquiry. It seems that the statistical stars have aligned in the most surprising of ways, and it is with great delight that we leave this peculiar correlation to enchant and intrigue future researchers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Energy Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sports Statistics and Aviation Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Scoring on the Diamond: Exploring the Jet Fuel Connection - A Statistical Analysis of Runs Scored by the Colorado Rockies and Jet Fuel Consumption in the United States with an abstract of This paper presents a whimsical yet rigorous exploration of the often overlooked relationship between jet fuel consumption in the United States and the runs scored by the Colorado Rockies baseball team. Employing a unique blend of statistical analysis and humor, our research team utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and Baseball-Reference.com to address this strikingly quirky question. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.7417091 and p < 0.01 for the years 1993 to 2022. While we acknowledge the absurdity of such a correlation, we present our results with utmost seriousness and a twinkle in our eyes, inviting fellow academics to join us in this delightful journey of discovery. As we unravel the enigmatic link between jet fuel and home runs at Coors Field, we cannot help but marvel at the delightful absurdity of our findings. This research not only sheds light on an unexpected phenomenon but also serves as a testament to the humor and whimsy that can be found in the most unlikely of places - even within the confines of academic inquiry.

ChatGPT:

"Colorado Rockies runs scored, United States jet fuel consumption, statistical analysis, Energy Information Administration data, Baseball-Reference.com data, correlation coefficient, Coors Field home runs, whimsical research, absurd correlation, academic inquiry"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Jet fuel used in United States
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in United States in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in United States

Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies
Detailed data title: The total number of runs scored during the year by the Colorado Rockies
Source: Baseball-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies

Correlation r = 0.7417091 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5501324 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Jet fuel used in United States) over the 30 years from 1993 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-6. 0.0000027306731945901570000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.74 in 0.00027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 366,210 random variables You don't actually need 366 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 29 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 29 because we have two variables measured over a period of 30 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.52, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Jet fuel used in United States (Million Barrels/Day)1357.391479.911497.181574.651597.971622.971674.711725.511655.641620.441578.191629.921678.991632.911622.391538.551393.191431.651425.341398.131434.41469.931548.241614.231682.181707.021743.381076.441369.881559.71
Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies (Runs scored)758573785961923826906968923778853833740813860747804770735758706755737845824780835275739698




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1357.39,1479.91,1497.18,1574.65,1597.97,1622.97,1674.71,1725.51,1655.64,1620.44,1578.19,1629.92,1678.99,1632.91,1622.39,1538.55,1393.19,1431.65,1425.34,1398.13,1434.4,1469.93,1548.24,1614.23,1682.18,1707.02,1743.38,1076.44,1369.88,1559.71,])
array_2 = np.array([758,573,785,961,923,826,906,968,923,778,853,833,740,813,860,747,804,770,735,758,706,755,737,845,824,780,835,275,739,698,])
array_1_name = "Jet fuel used in United States"
array_2_name = "Runs scored by the Colorado Rockies"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4196 · Black Variable ID: 25052 · Red Variable ID: 4356
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0