about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,276 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and the second variable is Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The clean air in Lumberton must have had a dad-ly impact, inspiring a breath of fresh responsibility and giving single fathers across the nation the lung power to step up! Who knew that fresh air could lead to a 'father'ing revolution!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a group of single fathers from different parts of the United States standing tall and proud in their respective homes, confidently embracing their roles with determination. The scene should be set in Lumberton, North Carolina, with clear and fresh air, depicting families enjoying outdoor activities together. The image should capture the inspired sense of responsibility and energy that the clean air seems to have instilled in the single fathers nationwide, as they find the strength and resilience to fully embrace their important roles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Woodblock painting Cubism Glitch art A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States, in the following situation: The clean air in Lumberton must have had a dad-ly impact, inspiring a breath of fresh responsibility and giving single fathers across the nation the lung power to step up! Who knew that fresh air could lead to a 'father'ing revolution!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of single fathers across the United States are seen standing tall and proud in their respective homes, taking on their roles with determination. The air in Lumberton, North Carolina is depicted as clear and fresh, with families enjoying outdoor activities together. The clean air seems to have inspired a new sense of responsibility and energy, as single fathers nationwide have found the strength and resilience to fully embrace their important roles.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: A group of single fathers across the United States are seen standing tall and proud in their respective homes, taking on their roles with determination. The air in Lumberton, North Carolina is depicted as clear and fresh, with families enjoying outdoor activities together. The clean air seems to have inspired a new sense of responsibility and energy, as single fathers nationwide have found the strength and resilience to fully embrace their important roles. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a group of single fathers from different parts of the United States standing tall and proud in their respective homes, confidently embracing their roles with determination. The scene should be set in Lumberton, North Carolina, with clear and fresh air, depicting families enjoying outdoor activities together. The image should capture the inspired sense of responsibility and energy that the clean air seems to have instilled in the single fathers nationwide, as they find the strength and resilience to fully embrace their important roles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina caused Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households

The Journal of Environmental Health and Family Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old adage goes, "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree," and in the case of air quality and single father households, it seems that the pollutants also don't stray too far from the homes. The intertwining of environmental factors and societal dynamics has long captivated the curious minds of researchers, and our study boldly ventures into this intriguing intersection. While some may regard this research question as a rather peculiar pairing – akin to matching socks in the dark – we assure you that our investigation is firmly grounded in rigorous analysis, not just a breath of fresh air!

Air quality, a topic that often floats under the radar, has been the subject of heated discussions and the proverbial storm in a teacup for decades. The inhalation of airborne contaminants has been linked to a cornucopia of health issues, spanning from respiratory ailments to cardiovascular complications. Meanwhile, the rise of single father households in the United States has been a notable demographic trend deserving attention – these dads are not just winging it! As researchers, we couldn't resist the temptation to probe deeper into this nexus of environmental equilibrium and familial dynamics.

The choice of Lumberton, North Carolina, as our focal point is not just a case of throwing darts at a map – it's a deliberate selection based on the unique combination of air quality challenges and the prevalence of single father households. The environmental landscape of Lumberton provides a rich tapestry for our investigation, as it grapples with the delicate dance between pollutants and pristine air. On the other hand, the prevalence of single father-headed households in the broader United States sets the stage for an enthralling exploration of family structures and the influence of environmental factors.

Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we have meticulously sifted through a deluge of numbers and metrics to unearth the tantalizing connections between air quality and single father households. The correlation coefficient we've unearthed is as strong as an ox (0.9352401, to be exact), coupled with a statistically significant p-value that practically whispers "Eureka!" at less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. These findings beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie within the web of air quality and familial compositions – it's a statistical safari like no other!

So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and mentally don your research goggles as we embark on a scientific escapade through the convoluted labyrinth of air quality in Lumberton and the landscape of single father households in the United States. It's bound to be a whirlwind journey, replete with statistical detours and theoretical twists that will leave you gasping for more!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree," and in the case of air quality and single father households, it seems that the pollutants also don't stray too far from the homes. The intertwining of environmental factors and societal dynamics has long captivated the curious minds of researchers, and our study boldly ventures into this intriguing intersection. While some may regard this research question as a rather peculiar pairing – akin to matching socks in the dark – we assure you that our investigation is firmly grounded in rigorous analysis, not just a breath of fresh air!
Air quality, a topic that often floats under the radar, has been the subject of heated discussions and the proverbial storm in a teacup for decades. The inhalation of airborne contaminants has been linked to a cornucopia of health issues, spanning from respiratory ailments to cardiovascular complications. Meanwhile, the rise of single father households in the United States has been a notable demographic trend deserving attention – these dads are not just winging it! As researchers, we couldn't resist the temptation to probe deeper into this nexus of environmental equilibrium and familial dynamics.
The choice of Lumberton, North Carolina, as our focal point is not just a case of throwing darts at a map – it's a deliberate selection based on the unique combination of air quality challenges and the prevalence of single father households. The environmental landscape of Lumberton provides a rich tapestry for our investigation, as it grapples with the delicate dance between pollutants and pristine air. On the other hand, the prevalence of single father-headed households in the broader United States sets the stage for an enthralling exploration of family structures and the influence of environmental factors.
Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we have meticulously sifted through a deluge of numbers and metrics to unearth the tantalizing connections between air quality and single father households. The correlation coefficient we've unearthed is as strong as an ox (0.9352401, to be exact), coupled with a statistically significant p-value that practically whispers "Eureka!" at less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. These findings beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie within the web of air quality and familial compositions – it's a statistical safari like no other!
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and mentally don your research goggles as we embark on a scientific escapade through the convoluted labyrinth of air quality in Lumberton and the landscape of single father households in the United States. It's bound to be a whirlwind journey, replete with statistical detours and theoretical twists that will leave you gasping for more!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we delve into the substantial body of research surrounding the intriguing intersection of air quality and single father households, it is imperative to ground our investigation in the existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) explore the impacts of air pollution on familial dynamics, shedding light on the potential stressors that may arise from living in areas with poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) offer insights into the demographic shifts within single father households, providing a comprehensive overview of the societal landscape in the United States. These studies serve as foundational pillars, anchoring our exploration into the labyrinthine world of environmental elements and family structures.

Turning our attention to non-fiction publications, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Atmospheric Conditions" by Dr. Clean Air presents a meticulous dissection of the various pollutants that infiltrate our surroundings. And let's not forget "Single Dads: Navigating Parenthood Solo" by Parenting Pro, which chronicles the experiences of single fathers across the nation. These resources provide invaluable context for our research, guiding us through the tumultuous terrain of air quality and familial compositions with scholarly finesse.

On the fictional front, "The Dusty Chronicles" by Fiction Author Extraordinaire ventures into a world where air quality becomes a central theme, intertwining with the protagonists' personal journeys as single parents. Additionally, "A Breath of Fresh Challenges" by Novelist Environmentalist immerses readers in a tale where single fathers grapple with environmental adversities, weaving a narrative that blurs the lines between reality and fiction.

Venturing beyond the conventional realms of academic literature, our research team went to great lengths to uncover unconventional sources of insight. From meticulously analyzing supermarket receipts to deciphering the hidden messages in fortune cookies, we left no stone unturned in our quest for knowledge. The fieldwork also included in-depth discussions with local meteorologists and whispered conversations with the wind itself – after all, who knows air quality better than the air?

In the spirited pursuit of knowledge, we cast our net wide and ventured into uncharted territories, all in the name of unraveling the enigmatic interplay between air quality in Lumberton and the prevalence of single father households in the United States. So, fasten your research goggles and prepare to journey through a landscape where statistical significance meets whimsical wonders – it's an odyssey that breathes life into the very essence of interdisciplinary exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista . You used data from 1990 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree," and in the case of air quality and single father households, it seems that the pollutants also don't stray too far from the homes. The intertwining of environmental factors and societal dynamics has long captivated the curious minds of researchers, and our study boldly ventures into this intriguing intersection. While some may regard this research question as a rather peculiar pairing – akin to matching socks in the dark – we assure you that our investigation is firmly grounded in rigorous analysis, not just a breath of fresh air!
Air quality, a topic that often floats under the radar, has been the subject of heated discussions and the proverbial storm in a teacup for decades. The inhalation of airborne contaminants has been linked to a cornucopia of health issues, spanning from respiratory ailments to cardiovascular complications. Meanwhile, the rise of single father households in the United States has been a notable demographic trend deserving attention – these dads are not just winging it! As researchers, we couldn't resist the temptation to probe deeper into this nexus of environmental equilibrium and familial dynamics.
The choice of Lumberton, North Carolina, as our focal point is not just a case of throwing darts at a map – it's a deliberate selection based on the unique combination of air quality challenges and the prevalence of single father households. The environmental landscape of Lumberton provides a rich tapestry for our investigation, as it grapples with the delicate dance between pollutants and pristine air. On the other hand, the prevalence of single father-headed households in the broader United States sets the stage for an enthralling exploration of family structures and the influence of environmental factors.
Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we have meticulously sifted through a deluge of numbers and metrics to unearth the tantalizing connections between air quality and single father households. The correlation coefficient we've unearthed is as strong as an ox (0.9352401, to be exact), coupled with a statistically significant p-value that practically whispers "Eureka!" at less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. These findings beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie within the web of air quality and familial compositions – it's a statistical safari like no other!
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and mentally don your research goggles as we embark on a scientific escapade through the convoluted labyrinth of air quality in Lumberton and the landscape of single father households in the United States. It's bound to be a whirlwind journey, replete with statistical detours and theoretical twists that will leave you gasping for more!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States, our research team embarked on a scientific endeavor that was as meticulously planned as a complex chemistry experiment and as intricate as a statistical puzzle. We combined the precision of a master chef with the tenacity of a dog with a bone to gather, analyze, and interpret the data with due diligence.

Data Collection:
First and foremost, we scoured the digital wilderness of the internet, venturing into the wilderness of databases and repositories to gather our dataset. The Environmental Protection Agency's air quality reports and Statista's treasure trove of demographic statistics emerged as our main sources of information, akin to the trusted beacons guiding researchers through the maze of data. We carefully selected data spanning the years 1990 to 2014, providing us with a comprehensive historical panorama of atmospheric conditions and household compositions.

For air quality metrics, we embraced a menagerie of pollutants—ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, to name a few—each revealing a unique facet of Lumberton's atmospheric character. These airborne actors were subjected to rigorous scrutiny, akin to casting auditions, to ensure that only the most influential pollutants made it to the final cut of our analysis. Meanwhile, the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States was akin to a census of superheroes, each contributing to the intricate tapestry of familial dynamics in the nation.

Data Analysis:
Once our data hoard was assembled, we harnessed the power of statistical tools to unveil the hidden connections weaving through the strands of air quality and single father household prevalence. Like astronomers peering through telescopes, we calculated correlation coefficients with the precision of stargazers charting constellations, seeking the elusive threads of association between our variables. We utilized linear regression models, treating our data to a mathematical waltz, to tease out the relationships and potential causal pathways between atmospheric conditions and household structures.

The statistical significance of our findings was as clear as the blue skies we aimed to understand, with p-values as crisp and compelling as freshly laundered lab coats. Our chosen significance level of less than 0.01 ensured that our conclusions were as robust as the legs of a physics prodigy's theorem.

Limitations and Assumptions:
As with any scientific endeavor, we acknowledge the limitations that lurk within the crevices of our study. The reliance on historical data imposes its own constraints, akin to attempting to bake a cake with ingredients left over from a bygone era. Additionally, while our statistical analyses and mathematical manipulations provide valuable insights, they are not immune to the uncertainties and potential confounding variables that lurk like mischievous imps in the realm of research.

Nonetheless, armed with the rigorous methodologies and unyielding determination reminiscent of intrepid explorers, we set out to unravel the mysteries underpinning the linkage between air quality in Lumberton and the prevalence of single father households in the United States. Our journey through the scientific underbrush of data analysis and statistical scrutiny has not just been a quest for knowledge—it's been a thrilling adventure through the uncharted territories of environmental and demographic interactions.

So, with bated breath and an enthusiasm as buoyant as a hot air balloon, we present our findings, ready to uplift the discourse surrounding the confluence of air quality and familial structures. It's a statistical symphony and a scientific saga unlike any other, poised to captivate and enlighten those who dare to embark on this quest for understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista .

For the time period 1990 to 2014, you found a correlation 0.9352401, r-squared of 0.8746740, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old adage goes, "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree," and in the case of air quality and single father households, it seems that the pollutants also don't stray too far from the homes. The intertwining of environmental factors and societal dynamics has long captivated the curious minds of researchers, and our study boldly ventures into this intriguing intersection. While some may regard this research question as a rather peculiar pairing – akin to matching socks in the dark – we assure you that our investigation is firmly grounded in rigorous analysis, not just a breath of fresh air!
Air quality, a topic that often floats under the radar, has been the subject of heated discussions and the proverbial storm in a teacup for decades. The inhalation of airborne contaminants has been linked to a cornucopia of health issues, spanning from respiratory ailments to cardiovascular complications. Meanwhile, the rise of single father households in the United States has been a notable demographic trend deserving attention – these dads are not just winging it! As researchers, we couldn't resist the temptation to probe deeper into this nexus of environmental equilibrium and familial dynamics.
The choice of Lumberton, North Carolina, as our focal point is not just a case of throwing darts at a map – it's a deliberate selection based on the unique combination of air quality challenges and the prevalence of single father households. The environmental landscape of Lumberton provides a rich tapestry for our investigation, as it grapples with the delicate dance between pollutants and pristine air. On the other hand, the prevalence of single father-headed households in the broader United States sets the stage for an enthralling exploration of family structures and the influence of environmental factors.
Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we have meticulously sifted through a deluge of numbers and metrics to unearth the tantalizing connections between air quality and single father households. The correlation coefficient we've unearthed is as strong as an ox (0.9352401, to be exact), coupled with a statistically significant p-value that practically whispers "Eureka!" at less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. These findings beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie within the web of air quality and familial compositions – it's a statistical safari like no other!
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and mentally don your research goggles as we embark on a scientific escapade through the convoluted labyrinth of air quality in Lumberton and the landscape of single father households in the United States. It's bound to be a whirlwind journey, replete with statistical detours and theoretical twists that will leave you gasping for more!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista unveiled an astonishing correlation between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. It seems that these variables weren't just blowing hot air after all – they were locked in a statistical tango of significance.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 between our two variables was stronger than a coffee after an all-nighter – it practically jumped off the spreadsheet, waving a neon sign saying "Look at me, I'm significant!" This coefficient's solid grip on the relationship between air quality and single father households left us breathless, and not just from the atmospheric conditions in Lumberton.

Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8746740 indicated that a whopping 87.5% of the variability in the number of single father households could be explained by the variation in air quality. This finding is not something we can lightly breeze over – it's a testament to the influence of environmental factors on family structures, and it sure blew our expectations out of the water.

To top it off, the p-value of less than 0.01 was as rare as a unicorn in the world of statistics, providing resounding evidence of the robustness of our findings. It's the kind of p-value that makes researchers want to throw a statistical party and break out the fancy hypotheses – if only such parties weren't so rare.

And, of course, let's not forget about our trusty scatterplot (Fig. 1) – it was a visual masterpiece, showcasing the strong linear relationship between air quality and single father households. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot was practically penning a symphony of statistical perfection.

In conclusion, our results not only support the notion of a significant association between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the prevalence of single father households in the United States, but they also open the windows to a world of possibilities for future research in this area. These findings are more than just a breath of fresh air – they're a gust of inspiration for delving into the intricate connections between environmental influences and societal demographics. So, let's grab our statistical umbrellas and prepare for a storm of groundbreaking research ahead!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we delve into the substantial body of research surrounding the intriguing intersection of air quality and single father households, it is imperative to ground our investigation in the existing literature. Smith et al. (2015) explore the impacts of air pollution on familial dynamics, shedding light on the potential stressors that may arise from living in areas with poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) offer insights into the demographic shifts within single father households, providing a comprehensive overview of the societal landscape in the United States. These studies serve as foundational pillars, anchoring our exploration into the labyrinthine world of environmental elements and family structures.
Turning our attention to non-fiction publications, "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Atmospheric Conditions" by Dr. Clean Air presents a meticulous dissection of the various pollutants that infiltrate our surroundings. And let's not forget "Single Dads: Navigating Parenthood Solo" by Parenting Pro, which chronicles the experiences of single fathers across the nation. These resources provide invaluable context for our research, guiding us through the tumultuous terrain of air quality and familial compositions with scholarly finesse.
On the fictional front, "The Dusty Chronicles" by Fiction Author Extraordinaire ventures into a world where air quality becomes a central theme, intertwining with the protagonists' personal journeys as single parents. Additionally, "A Breath of Fresh Challenges" by Novelist Environmentalist immerses readers in a tale where single fathers grapple with environmental adversities, weaving a narrative that blurs the lines between reality and fiction.
Venturing beyond the conventional realms of academic literature, our research team went to great lengths to uncover unconventional sources of insight. From meticulously analyzing supermarket receipts to deciphering the hidden messages in fortune cookies, we left no stone unturned in our quest for knowledge. The fieldwork also included in-depth discussions with local meteorologists and whispered conversations with the wind itself – after all, who knows air quality better than the air?
In the spirited pursuit of knowledge, we cast our net wide and ventured into uncharted territories, all in the name of unraveling the enigmatic interplay between air quality in Lumberton and the prevalence of single father households in the United States. So, fasten your research goggles and prepare to journey through a landscape where statistical significance meets whimsical wonders – it's an odyssey that breathes life into the very essence of interdisciplinary exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista unveiled an astonishing correlation between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. It seems that these variables weren't just blowing hot air after all – they were locked in a statistical tango of significance.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 between our two variables was stronger than a coffee after an all-nighter – it practically jumped off the spreadsheet, waving a neon sign saying "Look at me, I'm significant!" This coefficient's solid grip on the relationship between air quality and single father households left us breathless, and not just from the atmospheric conditions in Lumberton.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8746740 indicated that a whopping 87.5% of the variability in the number of single father households could be explained by the variation in air quality. This finding is not something we can lightly breeze over – it's a testament to the influence of environmental factors on family structures, and it sure blew our expectations out of the water.
To top it off, the p-value of less than 0.01 was as rare as a unicorn in the world of statistics, providing resounding evidence of the robustness of our findings. It's the kind of p-value that makes researchers want to throw a statistical party and break out the fancy hypotheses – if only such parties weren't so rare.
And, of course, let's not forget about our trusty scatterplot (Fig. 1) – it was a visual masterpiece, showcasing the strong linear relationship between air quality and single father households. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot was practically penning a symphony of statistical perfection.
In conclusion, our results not only support the notion of a significant association between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the prevalence of single father households in the United States, but they also open the windows to a world of possibilities for future research in this area. These findings are more than just a breath of fresh air – they're a gust of inspiration for delving into the intricate connections between environmental influences and societal demographics. So, let's grab our statistical umbrellas and prepare for a storm of groundbreaking research ahead!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have blown the lid off the idea that air quality and the prevalence of single father households are entirely separate matters. It turns out they're as interconnected as a pair of unruly electrical cords – you can try to keep them apart, but they're just going to get tangled up again.

Our results align with previous research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017), who suggested that air pollution can act as a stressor in family dynamics and that demographic shifts impact single father households. It's as though our study has taken a deep breath and exhaled a resounding "I concur!," echoing the sentiments of these esteemed researchers.

The literature review may have seemed quirky with its nods to fictional works and unconventional sources, but the serious connection between air quality and single father households is no flight of fancy. Our data provides empirical support for the notion that air quality plays a substantial role in shaping the landscape of family structures.

The correlation coefficient we uncovered, as sturdy as a reinforced steel beam, reinforces the idea that this relationship is not just a whimsical statistical dance – it's a full-blown tango of significance. A correlation so strong, it might as well be bench-pressing the weight of our expectations.

The r-squared value, at a staggering 87.5%, is not something we can just brush off like dandelion seeds – it indicates that air quality explains a significant chunk of the variability in the number of single father households. It's as though air quality is holding a megaphone and shouting, "I'm here, and I matter!"

And let's not forget the p-value, as elusive as a rare Pokémon in the world of statistics. It's not just a number; it's a stamp of approval from the statistical deities, indicating that our findings are as solid as a petrified tree trunk.

Our trusty scatterplot (Fig. 1) isn't just a pretty picture. It's a clear visual representation of the strong relationship between air quality and single father households, akin to an artistic masterpiece painted with the finest statistical brush strokes.

In conclusion, our results provide empirical backing for the significant association between air quality in Lumberton and the prevalence of single father households in the United States. This research is more than just a breath of fresh air – it's a gust of inspiration for future studies to dive deep into the intricate connections between environmental influences and societal demographics. It's time to roll up our sleeves and let the winds of curiosity carry us to new frontiers of interdisciplinary exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina and Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree," and in the case of air quality and single father households, it seems that the pollutants also don't stray too far from the homes. The intertwining of environmental factors and societal dynamics has long captivated the curious minds of researchers, and our study boldly ventures into this intriguing intersection. While some may regard this research question as a rather peculiar pairing – akin to matching socks in the dark – we assure you that our investigation is firmly grounded in rigorous analysis, not just a breath of fresh air!
Air quality, a topic that often floats under the radar, has been the subject of heated discussions and the proverbial storm in a teacup for decades. The inhalation of airborne contaminants has been linked to a cornucopia of health issues, spanning from respiratory ailments to cardiovascular complications. Meanwhile, the rise of single father households in the United States has been a notable demographic trend deserving attention – these dads are not just winging it! As researchers, we couldn't resist the temptation to probe deeper into this nexus of environmental equilibrium and familial dynamics.
The choice of Lumberton, North Carolina, as our focal point is not just a case of throwing darts at a map – it's a deliberate selection based on the unique combination of air quality challenges and the prevalence of single father households. The environmental landscape of Lumberton provides a rich tapestry for our investigation, as it grapples with the delicate dance between pollutants and pristine air. On the other hand, the prevalence of single father-headed households in the broader United States sets the stage for an enthralling exploration of family structures and the influence of environmental factors.
Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we have meticulously sifted through a deluge of numbers and metrics to unearth the tantalizing connections between air quality and single father households. The correlation coefficient we've unearthed is as strong as an ox (0.9352401, to be exact), coupled with a statistically significant p-value that practically whispers "Eureka!" at less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. These findings beckon us to unravel the mysteries that lie within the web of air quality and familial compositions – it's a statistical safari like no other!
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts and mentally don your research goggles as we embark on a scientific escapade through the convoluted labyrinth of air quality in Lumberton and the landscape of single father households in the United States. It's bound to be a whirlwind journey, replete with statistical detours and theoretical twists that will leave you gasping for more!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista unveiled an astonishing correlation between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. It seems that these variables weren't just blowing hot air after all – they were locked in a statistical tango of significance.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 between our two variables was stronger than a coffee after an all-nighter – it practically jumped off the spreadsheet, waving a neon sign saying "Look at me, I'm significant!" This coefficient's solid grip on the relationship between air quality and single father households left us breathless, and not just from the atmospheric conditions in Lumberton.
Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.8746740 indicated that a whopping 87.5% of the variability in the number of single father households could be explained by the variation in air quality. This finding is not something we can lightly breeze over – it's a testament to the influence of environmental factors on family structures, and it sure blew our expectations out of the water.
To top it off, the p-value of less than 0.01 was as rare as a unicorn in the world of statistics, providing resounding evidence of the robustness of our findings. It's the kind of p-value that makes researchers want to throw a statistical party and break out the fancy hypotheses – if only such parties weren't so rare.
And, of course, let's not forget about our trusty scatterplot (Fig. 1) – it was a visual masterpiece, showcasing the strong linear relationship between air quality and single father households. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then this scatterplot was practically penning a symphony of statistical perfection.
In conclusion, our results not only support the notion of a significant association between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the prevalence of single father households in the United States, but they also open the windows to a world of possibilities for future research in this area. These findings are more than just a breath of fresh air – they're a gust of inspiration for delving into the intricate connections between environmental influences and societal demographics. So, let's grab our statistical umbrellas and prepare for a storm of groundbreaking research ahead!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has definitively established a stronger connection between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the prevalence of single father households in the United States than between peanut butter and jelly! The correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 was so robust, it could bench-press the entire data set without breaking a statistical sweat. And that r-squared value of 0.8746740? It's the clingy friend who explains a whopping 87.5% of the variability in single father households – talk about needing personal space!

The p-value of less than 0.01 was as elusive as a rare Pokémon, but unlike Pokémon, we actually caught it! We're not saying it's time to break out the champagne (or should we say chi-squared?), but these findings are more than just a blip on the radar – they're a full-blown statistical hurricane. As for our trusty scatterplot (Fig. 1), it could easily win an award for "Best Supporting Visualization," making other plots green with envy.

In light of these monumental findings, it's as clear as the air on a crisp autumn day that further research in this area is about as necessary as a fish riding a bicycle. We've confidently uncovered a treasure trove of statistical gold here, and it's time to let these results shine like the North Star of scientific discovery. So, let's power down our calculators, hang up our lab coats, and raise a toast to the end of this research journey. As they say in the world of academia, "Take a deep breath, and don't inhale any statistical significance!" There's no need for further research in this area – we've cracked this puzzle wide open, like a shellfish at a statistical feast.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Health and Family Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Environmental Justice and Family Wellness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Clearing the Air: A Breath of Fresh Data on Air Quality in Lumberton and Single Father Households with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the relationship between air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina, and the number of households headed by single fathers in the United States. While some may think this is an odd pairing, we assure you that our research is not just full of hot air! Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we've uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9352401 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2014. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a breath of truth to the connection between air quality and the prevalence of single father households. So, buckle up your air filters and get ready for a wild ride through the world of atmospheric conditions and family dynamics!

ChatGPT:

Air quality, Lumberton, North Carolina, single father households, Environmental Protection Agency data, Statista, correlation coefficient, p-value, atmospheric conditions, family dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Lumberton, NC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina

Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9352401 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8746740 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina) over the 25 years from 1990 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-12. 0.0000000000074207782592494800
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 7.4E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 134,756,755,298 random variables You don't actually need 134 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 24 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 24 because we have two variables measured over a period of 25 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina (Good air quality)000000000000.4869570.550.5217390.5250.5384620.5702480.5294120.5862070.7521370.6942150.7024790.8360660.8632480.841667
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States (Single father households)2907302530652914322835133847391139774099427744404663471749015134506751035255558256495888623163306162




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.486957,0.55,0.521739,0.525,0.538462,0.570248,0.529412,0.586207,0.752137,0.694215,0.702479,0.836066,0.863248,0.841667,])
array_2 = np.array([2907,3025,3065,2914,3228,3513,3847,3911,3977,4099,4277,4440,4663,4717,4901,5134,5067,5103,5255,5582,5649,5888,6231,6330,6162,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Lumberton, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 4276 · Black Variable ID: 21622 · Red Variable ID: 355
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0