about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,325 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Leonel and the second variable is Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina.  The chart goes from 1978 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Leonel is born, a secret message is transmitted via baby babble directly into the minds of North Carolina Republicans, compelling them to head to the polls. It's like a tiny, adorable, conservative rally cry that they just can't resist! Who knew that baby Leonels held the key to political influence in North Carolina? It's a 'Lion King' level of power, and it's no coincidence that it's shaping the mane-steam of elections in the Tar Heel State!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a TIME magazine cover, depicting a bustling urban scene in North Carolina. In the foreground, show a newborn baby named Leonel letting out his first cry, while in the background, illustrate a wave of Republican voters eagerly heading to the polls. The image should convey a subtle, mystical connection between the baby's name and the mobilization of the conservative voter base, shaping the political landscape of the state. The visual should capture the impactful influence of the name "Leonel" on the election, without the use of words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami A TIME magazine cover image Voxel art Data cyber art Psychedelic
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina, in the following situation: Every time someone named Leonel is born, a secret message is transmitted via baby babble directly into the minds of North Carolina Republicans, compelling them to head to the polls. It's like a tiny, adorable, conservative rally cry that they just can't resist! Who knew that baby Leonels held the key to political influence in North Carolina? It's a 'Lion King' level of power, and it's no coincidence that it's shaping the mane-steam of elections in the Tar Heel State!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling North Carolina city, a baby named Leonel is born, and as he lets out his first cry, a wave of Republican voters in the state feels an unexplainable urge to head to the polls. The newborn's name seems to carry an invisible force that mobilizes the conservative voter base, shaping the political landscape of the state. It's as if each baby named Leonel possesses the power to influence the election, creating a uniquely impactful connection between the popularity of the name and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling North Carolina city, a baby named Leonel is born, and as he lets out his first cry, a wave of Republican voters in the state feels an unexplainable urge to head to the polls. The newborn's name seems to carry an invisible force that mobilizes the conservative voter base, shaping the political landscape of the state. It's as if each baby named Leonel possesses the power to influence the election, creating a uniquely impactful connection between the popularity of the name and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a TIME magazine cover, depicting a bustling urban scene in North Carolina. In the foreground, show a newborn baby named Leonel letting out his first cry, while in the background, illustrate a wave of Republican voters eagerly heading to the polls. The image should convey a subtle, mystical connection between the baby's name and the mobilization of the conservative voter base, shaping the political landscape of the state. The visual should capture the impactful influence of the name "Leonel" on the election, without the use of words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Leonel caused Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina

The Journal of Sociopolitical Naming Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9108778 and p < 0.01 for 1978 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

"Knock knock."
"Who's there?"
"Leonel."
"Leonel who?"
"Leonel who might influence your political choices in North Carolina!"

The intersection of nomenclature and political predilections has long been a subject of fascination, but the connection between a name's popularity and voting patterns has seldom been explored. Our study, "Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina," endeavors to unravel this enigmatic relationship.

In a world where political affiliations can be as polarizing as a pair of magnets, the influence of seemingly trivial factors such as first names on electoral decisions presents a compelling enigma. While the idea may elicit skepticism akin to a dad joke at first glance, our investigation aims to shed light on the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the propensity to cast a Republican vote in the state of North Carolina.

As we embark on this academic endeavor, it is pertinent to acknowledge the historical influence of names in shaping societal perceptions and biases. From the iconic "John" and "Jane" to the unique "Chad" and "Tiffany," names carry cultural connotations that could permeate into the realm of politics. After all, a name is more than mere nomenclature; it carries a legacy, a narrative, and apparently, a political inclination.

Our research draws inspiration from the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate dance between identity and politics. It aims to unravel the mysteries behind the correlation between a name as distinct as "Leonel" and the voting trends for Republican senators in North Carolina. Let's just say, we're diving into uncharted waters, but hey, someone has to plunge headfirst into the deep end of the pun pool.

So, prepare to be both entertained and enlightened as we navigate through the intriguing landscape where nomenclature and politics share a surprising tango. And remember, if you ever feel the weight of the world on your shoulders, just think about the statistical significance of a name's influence on politics—you might find yourself chuckling amidst the data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Knock knock."
"Who's there?"
"Leonel."
"Leonel who?"
"Leonel who might influence your political choices in North Carolina!"
The intersection of nomenclature and political predilections has long been a subject of fascination, but the connection between a name's popularity and voting patterns has seldom been explored. Our study, "Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina," endeavors to unravel this enigmatic relationship.
In a world where political affiliations can be as polarizing as a pair of magnets, the influence of seemingly trivial factors such as first names on electoral decisions presents a compelling enigma. While the idea may elicit skepticism akin to a dad joke at first glance, our investigation aims to shed light on the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the propensity to cast a Republican vote in the state of North Carolina.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, it is pertinent to acknowledge the historical influence of names in shaping societal perceptions and biases. From the iconic "John" and "Jane" to the unique "Chad" and "Tiffany," names carry cultural connotations that could permeate into the realm of politics. After all, a name is more than mere nomenclature; it carries a legacy, a narrative, and apparently, a political inclination.
Our research draws inspiration from the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate dance between identity and politics. It aims to unravel the mysteries behind the correlation between a name as distinct as "Leonel" and the voting trends for Republican senators in North Carolina. Let's just say, we're diving into uncharted waters, but hey, someone has to plunge headfirst into the deep end of the pun pool.
So, prepare to be both entertained and enlightened as we navigate through the intriguing landscape where nomenclature and politics share a surprising tango. And remember, if you ever feel the weight of the world on your shoulders, just think about the statistical significance of a name's influence on politics—you might find yourself chuckling amidst the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The influence of names on individual behavior and societal perceptions has been a subject of long-standing interest in academic circles. Smith et al. (2005) examined the role of nomenclature in shaping cognitive biases, shedding light on the psychological implications of names in various contexts. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2010) delved into the cultural significance of names and their impact on self-identity and interpersonal relationships.

Now, let's pivot to some more unconventional sources that will surely make you name-drop in your next political debate. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors explore the unexpected and often amusing side of human behavior, where subtle influences such as names can lead to significant outcomes. Meanwhile, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the rapid cognition and decision-making processes, offering insights into how unconscious biases, including those related to names, can sway individual choices.

In the fictitious realm, the novel "American Psycho" by Bret Easton Ellis offers a satirical take on societal norms and individuals' perceptions, where names play a role in defining characters and their interactions. On the lighter side, the classic novel "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen intricately weaves social commentary with romantic entanglements, showcasing the nuanced influence of names and societal expectations.

Taking a detour into the world of board games, "Scrabble" and "Name That Person" offer playful perspectives on the significance of names and words. After all, who wouldn't want to strategize their way to victory with an exceptionally named character or word?

So, what do you get when you cross a statistical analysis with a penchant for puns and dad jokes? A paper investigating the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina! But fear not, dear reader, for this lighthearted exploration is not without its merits; it uncovers the delightful intersection where academic inquiry meets the quirky intricacies of human behavior. Just when you thought research couldn't get punnier, we're here to prove you wrong!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1978 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
"Knock knock."
"Who's there?"
"Leonel."
"Leonel who?"
"Leonel who might influence your political choices in North Carolina!"
The intersection of nomenclature and political predilections has long been a subject of fascination, but the connection between a name's popularity and voting patterns has seldom been explored. Our study, "Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina," endeavors to unravel this enigmatic relationship.
In a world where political affiliations can be as polarizing as a pair of magnets, the influence of seemingly trivial factors such as first names on electoral decisions presents a compelling enigma. While the idea may elicit skepticism akin to a dad joke at first glance, our investigation aims to shed light on the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the propensity to cast a Republican vote in the state of North Carolina.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, it is pertinent to acknowledge the historical influence of names in shaping societal perceptions and biases. From the iconic "John" and "Jane" to the unique "Chad" and "Tiffany," names carry cultural connotations that could permeate into the realm of politics. After all, a name is more than mere nomenclature; it carries a legacy, a narrative, and apparently, a political inclination.
Our research draws inspiration from the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate dance between identity and politics. It aims to unravel the mysteries behind the correlation between a name as distinct as "Leonel" and the voting trends for Republican senators in North Carolina. Let's just say, we're diving into uncharted waters, but hey, someone has to plunge headfirst into the deep end of the pun pool.
So, prepare to be both entertained and enlightened as we navigate through the intriguing landscape where nomenclature and politics share a surprising tango. And remember, if you ever feel the weight of the world on your shoulders, just think about the statistical significance of a name's influence on politics—you might find yourself chuckling amidst the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To kick things off, we embarked on a journey through the digital realms of the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. Our team's foray into cyberspace was akin to navigating a labyrinth of information, where we sought the elusive connection between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina.

Like intrepid explorers of the digital age, we ventured into the vast expanse of datasets spanning from 1978 to 2020. Our mission? To gather copious amounts of data on the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the electoral preferences for Republican senators, all while resisting the siren call of cat videos and online shopping temptations. It was a true test of data-wrangling fortitude, where Excel sheets became our compass, and statistical software our trusty steed.

Much like a Sherlock Holmes in the realm of data analysis, we employed a method as intricate as a Rube Goldberg machine. Our approach involved a combination of t-testing, regression analysis, and categorical comparisons, all meticulously conducted to discern the potential relationship between the name "Leonel" and Republican voting tendencies. It was a complicated dance of algorithms and computation, where even the most Sherlockian of minds could get a bit discombobulated.

In addition to our statistical escapades, we incorporated geographical mapping to visually depict the concentration of individuals bearing the name "Leonel" alongside Republican voting hotspots in North Carolina. The resulting cartographic spectacle was a blend of art and science, evoking the spirit of adventurous cartographers charting unexplored territories, albeit with fewer compass malfunctions and more coffee breaks.

With the tenacity of a caffeinated squirrel storing nuts for winter, we navigated the labyrinth of data points, cross-referencing and scrutinizing each snippet of information with the fervor of a meme connoisseur debating the merits of a cat versus dog meme. Ultimately, our tumultuous journey through the digital seas of data led to the unfolding of a captivating correlation between the name "Leonel" and the proclivity for Republican votes in North Carolina.

In the words of William Shakespeare, "To Leonel or not to Leonel, that is the statistical question." It was a journey fraught with data perils and pun-packed revelations, but in the end, we emerged with remarkable insights into the interconnectedness of nomenclature and political predilections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1978 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9108778, r-squared of 0.8296984, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
"Knock knock."
"Who's there?"
"Leonel."
"Leonel who?"
"Leonel who might influence your political choices in North Carolina!"
The intersection of nomenclature and political predilections has long been a subject of fascination, but the connection between a name's popularity and voting patterns has seldom been explored. Our study, "Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina," endeavors to unravel this enigmatic relationship.
In a world where political affiliations can be as polarizing as a pair of magnets, the influence of seemingly trivial factors such as first names on electoral decisions presents a compelling enigma. While the idea may elicit skepticism akin to a dad joke at first glance, our investigation aims to shed light on the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the propensity to cast a Republican vote in the state of North Carolina.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, it is pertinent to acknowledge the historical influence of names in shaping societal perceptions and biases. From the iconic "John" and "Jane" to the unique "Chad" and "Tiffany," names carry cultural connotations that could permeate into the realm of politics. After all, a name is more than mere nomenclature; it carries a legacy, a narrative, and apparently, a political inclination.
Our research draws inspiration from the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate dance between identity and politics. It aims to unravel the mysteries behind the correlation between a name as distinct as "Leonel" and the voting trends for Republican senators in North Carolina. Let's just say, we're diving into uncharted waters, but hey, someone has to plunge headfirst into the deep end of the pun pool.
So, prepare to be both entertained and enlightened as we navigate through the intriguing landscape where nomenclature and politics share a surprising tango. And remember, if you ever feel the weight of the world on your shoulders, just think about the statistical significance of a name's influence on politics—you might find yourself chuckling amidst the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation indicate a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9108778 suggests a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that in North Carolina, the name "Leonel" carries more electoral weight than a politician's promises during campaign season.

Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot representing the unmistakable relationship between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators. The data points fall into place with the precision of a well-rehearsed stand-up routine, highlighting the consistent association between the two factors. This correlation is as undeniable as the fact that "Leonel" will always be an interesting conversation starter at political gatherings.

Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8296984, indicating that approximately 83% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina can be explained by the popularity of the name "Leonel." This suggests that the name "Leonel" wields a substantial influence on political leanings in the state, perhaps even more than a catchy campaign slogan does.

Furthermore, our findings yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the influence of the name "Leonel" on Republican voting behavior is about as noticeable as a dad joke at a family reunion—it's impossible to ignore.

In summary, our study unravels a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the predilection for Republican votes in North Carolina. The data imparts a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations, showcasing the unmistakable influence of a name on electoral decisions. It's safe to say that in the realm of North Carolina politics, "Leonel" isn't just a name; it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The influence of names on individual behavior and societal perceptions has been a subject of long-standing interest in academic circles. Smith et al. (2005) examined the role of nomenclature in shaping cognitive biases, shedding light on the psychological implications of names in various contexts. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2010) delved into the cultural significance of names and their impact on self-identity and interpersonal relationships.
Now, let's pivot to some more unconventional sources that will surely make you name-drop in your next political debate. In "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, the authors explore the unexpected and often amusing side of human behavior, where subtle influences such as names can lead to significant outcomes. Meanwhile, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the rapid cognition and decision-making processes, offering insights into how unconscious biases, including those related to names, can sway individual choices.
In the fictitious realm, the novel "American Psycho" by Bret Easton Ellis offers a satirical take on societal norms and individuals' perceptions, where names play a role in defining characters and their interactions. On the lighter side, the classic novel "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen intricately weaves social commentary with romantic entanglements, showcasing the nuanced influence of names and societal expectations.
Taking a detour into the world of board games, "Scrabble" and "Name That Person" offer playful perspectives on the significance of names and words. After all, who wouldn't want to strategize their way to victory with an exceptionally named character or word?
So, what do you get when you cross a statistical analysis with a penchant for puns and dad jokes? A paper investigating the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina! But fear not, dear reader, for this lighthearted exploration is not without its merits; it uncovers the delightful intersection where academic inquiry meets the quirky intricacies of human behavior. Just when you thought research couldn't get punnier, we're here to prove you wrong!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation indicate a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9108778 suggests a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that in North Carolina, the name "Leonel" carries more electoral weight than a politician's promises during campaign season.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot representing the unmistakable relationship between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators. The data points fall into place with the precision of a well-rehearsed stand-up routine, highlighting the consistent association between the two factors. This correlation is as undeniable as the fact that "Leonel" will always be an interesting conversation starter at political gatherings.
Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8296984, indicating that approximately 83% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina can be explained by the popularity of the name "Leonel." This suggests that the name "Leonel" wields a substantial influence on political leanings in the state, perhaps even more than a catchy campaign slogan does.
Furthermore, our findings yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the influence of the name "Leonel" on Republican voting behavior is about as noticeable as a dad joke at a family reunion—it's impossible to ignore.
In summary, our study unravels a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the predilection for Republican votes in North Carolina. The data imparts a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations, showcasing the unmistakable influence of a name on electoral decisions. It's safe to say that in the realm of North Carolina politics, "Leonel" isn't just a name; it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have unveiled an intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina, reinforcing prior studies that have underscored the subtle but impactful influence of names on human behavior and decision-making processes. The significant correlation coefficient we observed aligns with the findings of Smith et al. (2005), which highlighted the psychological implications of names. It's clear that the name "Leonel" carries more weight in North Carolina politics than a politician's hefty rhetoric during an election campaign.

As the old adage goes, "What's in a name?" Turns out, if the name is "Leonel," the answer might be "a few thousand votes." Our robust correlation coefficient of 0.9108778 echoes the sentiments of Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics," showcasing the unexpected yet consequential impact of seemingly trivial factors on real-world outcomes. It seems that in North Carolina, the name "Leonel" has a more pronounced effect on political leanings than a campaign trail balloon drop.

The r-squared value of 0.8296984 from our analysis suggests that approximately 83% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Leonel." This echoes the narrative put forth by Malcolm Gladwell in "Blink," where unconscious biases, including those related to names, can significantly sway individual choices. It's as if the name "Leonel" possesses the persuasive prowess of a captivating political speech, except it achieves its impact without saying a word.

Moreover, the striking p-value of less than 0.01 emphasizes the undeniable statistical significance of the correlation, akin to the persistence of a dad joke at a family reunion—it's impossible to overlook. Our findings lock in the observation from Ellis's "American Psycho," where names shape characters and their interactions, highlighting the nuanced influence of nomenclature in political decision-making. So, the next time someone suggests that a name is just a name, we can confidently point to our data and say, "Not in North Carolina."

In conclusion, our study not only adds a new dimension to the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations but also cements the notion that a name can indeed wield a formidable influence on electoral decisions. Upon reflection, it's evident that in the context of North Carolina politics, "Leonel" doesn't just signify an individual; it embodies a statistical force that leaves an indelible imprint on the state's electoral landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Leonel and Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.

Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.

It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.

Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
"Knock knock."
"Who's there?"
"Leonel."
"Leonel who?"
"Leonel who might influence your political choices in North Carolina!"
The intersection of nomenclature and political predilections has long been a subject of fascination, but the connection between a name's popularity and voting patterns has seldom been explored. Our study, "Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina," endeavors to unravel this enigmatic relationship.
In a world where political affiliations can be as polarizing as a pair of magnets, the influence of seemingly trivial factors such as first names on electoral decisions presents a compelling enigma. While the idea may elicit skepticism akin to a dad joke at first glance, our investigation aims to shed light on the correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the propensity to cast a Republican vote in the state of North Carolina.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, it is pertinent to acknowledge the historical influence of names in shaping societal perceptions and biases. From the iconic "John" and "Jane" to the unique "Chad" and "Tiffany," names carry cultural connotations that could permeate into the realm of politics. After all, a name is more than mere nomenclature; it carries a legacy, a narrative, and apparently, a political inclination.
Our research draws inspiration from the quirkiness of human behavior and the intricate dance between identity and politics. It aims to unravel the mysteries behind the correlation between a name as distinct as "Leonel" and the voting trends for Republican senators in North Carolina. Let's just say, we're diving into uncharted waters, but hey, someone has to plunge headfirst into the deep end of the pun pool.
So, prepare to be both entertained and enlightened as we navigate through the intriguing landscape where nomenclature and politics share a surprising tango. And remember, if you ever feel the weight of the world on your shoulders, just think about the statistical significance of a name's influence on politics—you might find yourself chuckling amidst the data.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation indicate a remarkably strong correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. The correlation coefficient of 0.9108778 suggests a robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It seems that in North Carolina, the name "Leonel" carries more electoral weight than a politician's promises during campaign season.
Fig. 1 illustrates the scatterplot representing the unmistakable relationship between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators. The data points fall into place with the precision of a well-rehearsed stand-up routine, highlighting the consistent association between the two factors. This correlation is as undeniable as the fact that "Leonel" will always be an interesting conversation starter at political gatherings.
Our analysis also revealed an r-squared value of 0.8296984, indicating that approximately 83% of the variation in Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina can be explained by the popularity of the name "Leonel." This suggests that the name "Leonel" wields a substantial influence on political leanings in the state, perhaps even more than a catchy campaign slogan does.
Furthermore, our findings yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the statistical significance of the correlation. To put it simply, the influence of the name "Leonel" on Republican voting behavior is about as noticeable as a dad joke at a family reunion—it's impossible to ignore.
In summary, our study unravels a peculiar yet compelling connection between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the predilection for Republican votes in North Carolina. The data imparts a fresh perspective on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations, showcasing the unmistakable influence of a name on electoral decisions. It's safe to say that in the realm of North Carolina politics, "Leonel" isn't just a name; it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has brought to light the noteworthy correlation between the frequency of the first name "Leonel" and the tendency to favor Republican senators in North Carolina. It seems that curiosity indeed killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back, as our investigation into this offbeat relationship has proven to be both enlightening and entertaining—just like a good dad joke at a family dinner.

Our findings indicate a correlation coefficient so high, it's almost as if "Leonel" himself cast the votes. It’s clear that there’s something about this name that resonates strongly with a significant portion of North Carolinians, and it's not just because it’s fun to say "Leonel" five times fast.

With an r-squared value so substantial, it's as if the name "Leonel" has become an integral part of the North Carolina political landscape, akin to biscuits and gravy in southern cuisine. One might even suggest that North Carolina politics could be characterized as the "Leonel Show," but we digress – let’s not go too far down the pun rabbit hole.

The statistical significance of the correlation, as indicated by the p-value, is as unmistakable as a bright red tie at a political rally. It's safe to say that the influence of the name "Leonel" on Republican votes in North Carolina is not to be underestimated, much like the impact of a well-timed punchline.

In light of these compelling findings, it’s clear that there’s no need for further research on this subject. Our study has comprehensively outlined the surprising connection between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and political preferences in North Carolina. It’s time to close this chapter and leave the "Leonel effect" as a whimsical yet firm fixture in the annals of political research. After all, sometimes a meaningful discovery can be as simple as a name and a voting booth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sociopolitical Naming Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Social Psyche Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Leonel, Lies, and Legislation: The Influence of Name Popularity on Political Preferences in North Carolina with an abstract of This paper investigates the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Leonel" and the Republican votes for Senators in North Carolina. Our research team meticulously analyzed data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to tackle this intriguing yet curious subject. We sought to determine whether there is a notable association between the frequency of the name "Leonel" and the voting patterns for Republican senators in North Carolina.
Upon delving into the data from 1978 to 2020, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9108778, with a p-value lower than your expectations for a stand-up comedian. In layman's terms, our results suggest a striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Leonel" and the propensity to vote for Republican senators in North Carolina.
It appears that there is more to a name than meets the eye, as our data indicates that a significant portion of the population with the name "Leonel" may have an inclination toward Republican preferences. Our research introduces an innovative perspective on the influence of names in shaping political tendencies, shedding light on the unexpected yet amusing interplay between nomenclature and political affiliations.
Intriguingly, our analysis yielded notable results, emphasizing the peculiar influence of names in the political arena. As the old saying goes, "What's in a name?". Well, according to our study, it could potentially influence your political leanings. Our findings inspire a renewed fascination with the unconventional and whimsical factors that shape human behavior. They also give a whole new meaning to "Leonel the Vote.

ChatGPT:

Leonel, Republican senators, North Carolina, name popularity, political preferences, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, influence of names, political tendencies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Leonel
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Leonel
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Leonel

Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Republican Senate candidates in North Carolina
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina

Correlation r = 0.9108778 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8296984 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Leonel) over the 15 years from 1978 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.4E-6. 0.0000023676065113725475000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.00024% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 422,367 random variables You don't actually need 422 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197819801984198619901992199619982002200420082010201420162020
Popularity of the first name Leonel (Babies born)129155168205266320325351407535572594709890929
Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina (Total votes)61915189806411567707538811087330129789013458309459431248660179145018875101458050142326023953802665600




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([129,155,168,205,266,320,325,351,407,535,572,594,709,890,929,])
array_2 = np.array([619151,898064,1156770,753881,1087330,1297890,1345830,945943,1248660,1791450,1887510,1458050,1423260,2395380,2665600,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Leonel"
array_2_name = "Votes for Republican Senators in North Carolina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4325 · Black Variable ID: 3201 · Red Variable ID: 26292
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0