about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,365 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia and the second variable is Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia decreased, it added to the state's overall apathy, causing a ripple effect that dampened the enthusiasm for stand-up comedy, math included. It seems the formula for political engagement is directly proportional to the laughter quotient, leading to a polynomial decrease in searches for Stand-Up Maths. It's a prime example of how even in the realm of entertainment, the power of politics can't be divided from the final outcome!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a small town bulletin board, prominently displaying election results with decreasing Democrat votes for Senators. Show the townspeople in the background, looking concerned and less energized. Include a local cafe with a sign promoting "Stand-Up Maths" and a once-bustling event room that now stands empty, contrasted with the decreasing Google searches for "Stand-Up Maths" on someone's phone by the cafe counter. Capture the noticeable shift from lively to subdued, reflecting the intertwining impact of political engagement and entertainment in the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie a meme Cute cartoon A photo-realistic image Realistic
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths', in the following situation: As the Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia decreased, it added to the state's overall apathy, causing a ripple effect that dampened the enthusiasm for stand-up comedy, math included. It seems the formula for political engagement is directly proportional to the laughter quotient, leading to a polynomial decrease in searches for Stand-Up Maths. It's a prime example of how even in the realm of entertainment, the power of politics can't be divided from the final outcome!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in West Virginia, a bulletin board displayed election results, showing a decrease in Democrat votes for Senators. As the numbers dwindled, the townspeople seemed less energized, with fewer smiles and laughter heard. A local cafe, known for hosting stand-up comedy shows, had a sign promoting "Stand-Up Maths" on its window. However, the once-bustling event room now had fewer people, and the Google searches for "Stand-Up Maths" were noticeably decreasing on someone's phone by the cafe counter. The atmosphere was marked by a visible shift from lively to subdued, reflecting the intertwining impact of political engagement and entertainment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in West Virginia, a bulletin board displayed election results, showing a decrease in Democrat votes for Senators. As the numbers dwindled, the townspeople seemed less energized, with fewer smiles and laughter heard. A local cafe, known for hosting stand-up comedy shows, had a sign promoting "Stand-Up Maths" on its window. However, the once-bustling event room now had fewer people, and the Google searches for "Stand-Up Maths" were noticeably decreasing on someone's phone by the cafe counter. The atmosphere was marked by a visible shift from lively to subdued, reflecting the intertwining impact of political engagement and entertainment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a small town bulletin board, prominently displaying election results with decreasing Democrat votes for Senators. Show the townspeople in the background, looking concerned and less energized. Include a local cafe with a sign promoting "Stand-Up Maths" and a once-bustling event room that now stands empty, contrasted with the decreasing Google searches for "Stand-Up Maths" on someone's phone by the cafe counter. Capture the noticeable shift from lively to subdued, reflecting the intertwining impact of political engagement and entertainment in the town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia caused Stand-Up Maths (Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

The Journal of Comedic Political Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for 2007 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the complex and ever-evolving world of political analysis, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected and seemingly nonsensical correlations. However, this study dives headfirst into a particularly quirky connection: the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. If there ever was a punchline waiting to be uncovered, this is it.

One cannot help but wonder, what could possibly link the political preferences of the constituents of West Virginia with their penchant for seeking out mathematical stand-up comedy online? It's a true mystery, as puzzling as why the statistician's plant died - because it had zero roots!

The aim of this research is to unravel this enigmatic association and unveil the potential implications it may have for understanding the behavior of voters in this unique context. Our investigation delves into the fundamental underpinnings of this unlikely correlation, aiming to bring both statistical rigor and a touch of humor to the forefront of political inquiry.

As we embark on this statistical journey, it's essential to approach this subject with a healthy dose of light-heartedness. After all, as every data enthusiast knows, "Statistically speaking, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are not Happy!" So, let us proceed with open minds and a sense of mirth as we explore this intriguing conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the complex and ever-evolving world of political analysis, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected and seemingly nonsensical correlations. However, this study dives headfirst into a particularly quirky connection: the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. If there ever was a punchline waiting to be uncovered, this is it.
One cannot help but wonder, what could possibly link the political preferences of the constituents of West Virginia with their penchant for seeking out mathematical stand-up comedy online? It's a true mystery, as puzzling as why the statistician's plant died - because it had zero roots!
The aim of this research is to unravel this enigmatic association and unveil the potential implications it may have for understanding the behavior of voters in this unique context. Our investigation delves into the fundamental underpinnings of this unlikely correlation, aiming to bring both statistical rigor and a touch of humor to the forefront of political inquiry.
As we embark on this statistical journey, it's essential to approach this subject with a healthy dose of light-heartedness. After all, as every data enthusiast knows, "Statistically speaking, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are not Happy!" So, let us proceed with open minds and a sense of mirth as we explore this intriguing conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To date, research on the intersection of political voting patterns and internet search behavior has largely focused on conventional topics such as candidate approval ratings, policy issues, and campaign strategies. However, an emerging area of interest involves the unlikely connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. According to Jones et al., (2018), utilizing innovative data mining techniques and advanced statistical analyses, a cohort of researchers investigated the potential correlation between political engagement and unconventional online interests. This study paved the way for the examination of seemingly unrelated variables, prompting a thought-provoking exploration of unexpected associations in the digital era.

In "The Power of People: The Four Keys to Success in America," Doe et al. (2016) discuss the intricate dynamics of voter behavior and the multifaceted influences that shape electoral outcomes. While the book predominantly focuses on sociological and economic factors, it inadvertently invites us to ponder the whimsical possibility of mathematics-themed comedy influencing political allegiances. The notion of voters being swayed by the allure of stand-up mathematical routines may appear far-fetched at first glance, but as the old saying goes, "Why should you never mention the number 288? It's two gross!"

In a similar vein, the works of renowned fiction authors also offer intriguing parallels to our exploration of unexpected correlations. In "Murder on the Orient Express" by Agatha Christie and "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, plots are intricately woven around cryptic connections and hidden meanings, akin to the peculiar link we are investigating. While these works of fiction are centered on thrilling mysteries and dramatic revelations, they mirror the unanticipated nature of our research findings, beckoning us to unravel the enigma of Stand-Up Maths and political votes in West Virginia.

Turning to the realm of cinema, the movie "Moneyball" directed by Bennett Miller presents an unconventional perspective on the statistical analysis of baseball performance. While this film may not directly relate to the focal points of our study, it underscores the significance of uncovering unconventional correlations and embracing unorthodox approaches to data analysis. Much like the characters in "Moneyball" challenged traditional scouting methods, our research embarks on an exploration of uncharted territory, probing a correlation that defies conventional wisdom and prompts us to ask, "What do you call a snake that's 3.14159 meters long? A π-thon!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the complex and ever-evolving world of political analysis, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected and seemingly nonsensical correlations. However, this study dives headfirst into a particularly quirky connection: the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. If there ever was a punchline waiting to be uncovered, this is it.
One cannot help but wonder, what could possibly link the political preferences of the constituents of West Virginia with their penchant for seeking out mathematical stand-up comedy online? It's a true mystery, as puzzling as why the statistician's plant died - because it had zero roots!
The aim of this research is to unravel this enigmatic association and unveil the potential implications it may have for understanding the behavior of voters in this unique context. Our investigation delves into the fundamental underpinnings of this unlikely correlation, aiming to bring both statistical rigor and a touch of humor to the forefront of political inquiry.
As we embark on this statistical journey, it's essential to approach this subject with a healthy dose of light-heartedness. After all, as every data enthusiast knows, "Statistically speaking, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are not Happy!" So, let us proceed with open minds and a sense of mirth as we explore this intriguing conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To conduct this peculiar investigation into the correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths', we employed a method as unconventional as the topic itself. Our research team embarked on a data mining expedition, sifting through the digital archives of MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends. It was a bit like panning for statistical gold in the vast expanse of the internet – but instead of gold, we found correlations and dad jokes. When it comes to research, we like to think outside the box, or should I say outside the bell curve!

The data collected for this study spanned from 2007 to 2020, providing a substantial temporal scope for our analysis. We aimed to capture any potential trends or patterns in the relationship between Democrat votes and interest in stand-up mathematics over this extensive timeframe. In the academic tenor of research, we took the term 'longitudinal study' quite literally. After all, when it comes to investigating the humor in mathematics, timing is everything – just ask the chronologically challenged statistician!

Our primary analysis involved the computation of a correlation coefficient between the two variables of interest. Now, if you're looking for a punchline, this might not be it, but bear with me. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the association. It's like the statistical equivalent of finding the common denominator between political voting behavior and math comedy appreciation. We also performed a statistical significance test to ensure that our findings were not merely the result of random chance. Spoiler alert: the results were statistically significant, and we couldn't be more amused!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8605845, r-squared of 0.7406056, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the complex and ever-evolving world of political analysis, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected and seemingly nonsensical correlations. However, this study dives headfirst into a particularly quirky connection: the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. If there ever was a punchline waiting to be uncovered, this is it.
One cannot help but wonder, what could possibly link the political preferences of the constituents of West Virginia with their penchant for seeking out mathematical stand-up comedy online? It's a true mystery, as puzzling as why the statistician's plant died - because it had zero roots!
The aim of this research is to unravel this enigmatic association and unveil the potential implications it may have for understanding the behavior of voters in this unique context. Our investigation delves into the fundamental underpinnings of this unlikely correlation, aiming to bring both statistical rigor and a touch of humor to the forefront of political inquiry.
As we embark on this statistical journey, it's essential to approach this subject with a healthy dose of light-heartedness. After all, as every data enthusiast knows, "Statistically speaking, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are not Happy!" So, let us proceed with open minds and a sense of mirth as we explore this intriguing conundrum.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' during the period from 2007 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that while some equations may be complex, this one is as simple as 1+1=2!

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7406056 suggests that approximately 74.1% of the variation in Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. It's truly impressive how mathematical comedy can explain political behavior almost as well as it explains why seven ate nine!

Our findings also indicate a statistically significant relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.05. This means that we can reject the null hypothesis and confidently say that there is a genuine connection between the two variables. In other words, the chances of this correlation occurring by random chance are about as likely as winning the lottery while simultaneously being struck by lightning on a sunny day!

The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. The data points are as tightly linked together as a comedian and his punchlines, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this association.

These results not only provide a glimpse into the fascinating interplay between mathematical humor and political preferences but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of voter behavior, let us not forget the words of wisdom from the great comedic statistician: "Why did the statistician only use a 3.14% confidence interval? Because he was π-thetic!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To date, research on the intersection of political voting patterns and internet search behavior has largely focused on conventional topics such as candidate approval ratings, policy issues, and campaign strategies. However, an emerging area of interest involves the unlikely connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. According to Jones et al., (2018), utilizing innovative data mining techniques and advanced statistical analyses, a cohort of researchers investigated the potential correlation between political engagement and unconventional online interests. This study paved the way for the examination of seemingly unrelated variables, prompting a thought-provoking exploration of unexpected associations in the digital era.
In "The Power of People: The Four Keys to Success in America," Doe et al. (2016) discuss the intricate dynamics of voter behavior and the multifaceted influences that shape electoral outcomes. While the book predominantly focuses on sociological and economic factors, it inadvertently invites us to ponder the whimsical possibility of mathematics-themed comedy influencing political allegiances. The notion of voters being swayed by the allure of stand-up mathematical routines may appear far-fetched at first glance, but as the old saying goes, "Why should you never mention the number 288? It's two gross!"
In a similar vein, the works of renowned fiction authors also offer intriguing parallels to our exploration of unexpected correlations. In "Murder on the Orient Express" by Agatha Christie and "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, plots are intricately woven around cryptic connections and hidden meanings, akin to the peculiar link we are investigating. While these works of fiction are centered on thrilling mysteries and dramatic revelations, they mirror the unanticipated nature of our research findings, beckoning us to unravel the enigma of Stand-Up Maths and political votes in West Virginia.
Turning to the realm of cinema, the movie "Moneyball" directed by Bennett Miller presents an unconventional perspective on the statistical analysis of baseball performance. While this film may not directly relate to the focal points of our study, it underscores the significance of uncovering unconventional correlations and embracing unorthodox approaches to data analysis. Much like the characters in "Moneyball" challenged traditional scouting methods, our research embarks on an exploration of uncharted territory, probing a correlation that defies conventional wisdom and prompts us to ask, "What do you call a snake that's 3.14159 meters long? A π-thon!"

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' during the period from 2007 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that while some equations may be complex, this one is as simple as 1+1=2!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7406056 suggests that approximately 74.1% of the variation in Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. It's truly impressive how mathematical comedy can explain political behavior almost as well as it explains why seven ate nine!
Our findings also indicate a statistically significant relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.05. This means that we can reject the null hypothesis and confidently say that there is a genuine connection between the two variables. In other words, the chances of this correlation occurring by random chance are about as likely as winning the lottery while simultaneously being struck by lightning on a sunny day!
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. The data points are as tightly linked together as a comedian and his punchlines, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this association.
These results not only provide a glimpse into the fascinating interplay between mathematical humor and political preferences but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of voter behavior, let us not forget the words of wisdom from the great comedic statistician: "Why did the statistician only use a 3.14% confidence interval? Because he was π-thetic!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unraveled a seemingly incongruous yet captivating relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and its statistical significance underscore the compelling link between these unlikely variables. It seems that it's not just the politicians in West Virginia who are skilled at getting a strong 'stand-up' vote!

The emergence of this correspondence aligns with the growing body of literature that has ventured into unexpected realms of data analysis. Jones et al. (2018) laid the groundwork for exploring unanticipated associations by employing innovative statistical techniques, echoing the approach utilized in our investigation. Our findings build upon their pioneering work and demonstrate that even the most unconventional connections warrant serious consideration. As the old saying goes, "Why don't statisticians trust standard deviations? Because they're mean!"

Expanding further, the works of Doe et al. (2016) indirectly led us to delve into the possibility of mathematical humor influencing political affinities. The unexpected interplay we discovered resonates with the whimsical humor that pervades the field of statistics. It's as if the voters in West Virginia decided to take a calculated risk and embrace the exponential laughter of stand-up mathematics with their political choices.

The r-squared value of 0.7406056 echoes the remarkable explanatory power of Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' in forecasting Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia. The substantial portion of variation elucidated by this correlation draws attention to the potential influence of mathematical comedy on political engagement. It's almost as if our findings are shouting, "Math jokes may just add up to political success after all!"

The statistically significant relationship punctuated by the p-value of less than 0.05 provides compelling evidence for the authenticity of the observed connection. This underscore the veracity of the bond between mathematical humor and political preferences in West Virginia. It's as if the data itself is telling us, "Don't be obtuse, the link is as real as a right angle!"

Our results open up a plethora of intriguing implications for the intersection of comic relief and political decision-making. Just as our research deftly intertwines humor and statistics, it exposes the uncharted potential for offbeat campaign strategies. As we continue to unveil the layers of this comedic correlation, let's not forget the insightful words of the legendary comedic statistician: "Why do statisticians prefer uncertainty to certainty? Because not everything in life is black and white!"

Our investigation provokes further inquiry into the curious nexus of mathematical comedy and its impact on political dynamics. It appears that the voters of West Virginia are not only adept at number-crunching but also have a keen sense of humor when it comes to casting their votes. It's as if the politicians have found the formula for success, and it equals a perfect ratio of mathematics and mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.

Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.

We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the complex and ever-evolving world of political analysis, it is not uncommon to stumble upon unexpected and seemingly nonsensical correlations. However, this study dives headfirst into a particularly quirky connection: the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. If there ever was a punchline waiting to be uncovered, this is it.
One cannot help but wonder, what could possibly link the political preferences of the constituents of West Virginia with their penchant for seeking out mathematical stand-up comedy online? It's a true mystery, as puzzling as why the statistician's plant died - because it had zero roots!
The aim of this research is to unravel this enigmatic association and unveil the potential implications it may have for understanding the behavior of voters in this unique context. Our investigation delves into the fundamental underpinnings of this unlikely correlation, aiming to bring both statistical rigor and a touch of humor to the forefront of political inquiry.
As we embark on this statistical journey, it's essential to approach this subject with a healthy dose of light-heartedness. After all, as every data enthusiast knows, "Statistically speaking, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are not Happy!" So, let us proceed with open minds and a sense of mirth as we explore this intriguing conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a striking correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' during the period from 2007 to 2020. The correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 indicates a robust positive relationship between the two variables. It seems that while some equations may be complex, this one is as simple as 1+1=2!
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7406056 suggests that approximately 74.1% of the variation in Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. It's truly impressive how mathematical comedy can explain political behavior almost as well as it explains why seven ate nine!
Our findings also indicate a statistically significant relationship, with a p-value of less than 0.05. This means that we can reject the null hypothesis and confidently say that there is a genuine connection between the two variables. In other words, the chances of this correlation occurring by random chance are about as likely as winning the lottery while simultaneously being struck by lightning on a sunny day!
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually demonstrates the strong positive correlation between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. The data points are as tightly linked together as a comedian and his punchlines, leaving little room for doubt about the strength of this association.
These results not only provide a glimpse into the fascinating interplay between mathematical humor and political preferences but also serve as a reminder that statistical analysis can be both enlightening and entertaining. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of voter behavior, let us not forget the words of wisdom from the great comedic statistician: "Why did the statistician only use a 3.14% confidence interval? Because he was π-thetic!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' has illuminated an unexpected and remarkably robust correlation. It's as if statistical analysis and comedic mathematics have coalesced to form a heartwarming friendship, proving that laughter truly knows no bounds - not even the rigid confines of political analysis! As we unravel the enigma of this connection, it's clear that this quirky correlation is no statistical fluke, much like how you can't simply "integrate" yourself out of a bad stand-up routine.

The strength of the correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and statistical significance all point to a genuine association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the voters of West Virginia have a keen appreciation for the harmonious blend of mathematical wit and political engagement. As every good statistician knows, correlation does not imply causation, but it does imply a good joke hidden in the data!

This whimsical revelation prompts us to consider the potential for injecting a bit of mathematical humor into the realm of political campaigns. Perhaps, in the spirit of bipartisanship, candidates could trade attack ads for punchlines, and policy debates for a good old-fashioned pun war. After all, as the saying goes, "Why was the obtuse triangle so frustrated? Because it was never right!" This research not only uncovers a curious connection but also hints at the promise of a more lighthearted approach to politics in the future.

With that said, it's safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. The numbers don't lie, and neither does the laughter that ensues from these findings. As we close this chapter in statistical hilarity, let's remember the timeless words of the infallible comedic statistician: "Statistics may be complicated, but they always add up to a good time!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Research Endeavors


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stand-Up Maths and Stand-Up Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google Searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' with an abstract of This study presents a statistical investigation into the relationship between Democrat votes for Senators in West Virginia and Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'. Using data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and Google Trends, we aimed to shed light on this peculiar association. Our research uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8605845 and p < 0.05 for the period from 2007 to 2020.
Our findings suggest a strong link between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting us to explore potential explanations for this unexpected connection. It seems that the art of mathematical humor may be capturing the attention of the politically inclined in West Virginia.
We also speculate that these findings may have implications for the development of innovative, joke-centered political campaigns in the future. In the immortal words of a particularly hilarious statistician, "Why was the statistician in so much demand at a comedy club? He could make a mean estimate!" This research not only provides unusual insights but also offers a good laugh in the world of political analysis.

ChatGPT:

Stand-Up Maths, Democrat votes West Virginia, Google searches, correlation analysis, political campaigns, mathematical humor, statistics and politics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia
Detailed data title: Total number of votes cast for Federal Democrat Senate candidates in West Virginia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia

Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'

Correlation r = 0.8605845 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7406056 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia) over the 6 years from 2007 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.028. 0.0278001541281330800000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 2.8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.16, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820102012201420182020
Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia (Total votes)447560283358399898156360288808210309
Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths' (Rel. search volume)12.752.083335.833330.52.166673.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([447560,283358,399898,156360,288808,210309,])
array_2 = np.array([12.75,2.08333,5.83333,0.5,2.16667,3.16667,])
array_1_name = "Votes for Democratic Senators in West Virginia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Stand-Up Maths'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are legendary!


Correlation ID: 4365 · Black Variable ID: 26333 · Red Variable ID: 1453
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0