about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,366 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Cyrus and the second variable is Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the popularity of the name Cyrus soared, more and more parents were subconsciously drawn to the idea of strong, leadership qualities for their children. This led to a ripple effect in North Carolina, where youngsters named Cyrus excelled in their school leadership roles, inadvertently inspiring their parents to lean towards the Republican candidate. It's a case of the name setting a 'cyrus' of events in motion, ultimately shaping the political landscape. Remember, behind every great leader is a trendy name!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image in 3D Pixar style set in a vibrant classroom in North Carolina. The scene is filled with young Cyruses leading various activities with contagious confidence, capturing the attention of their peers. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, parents are engaged in discussions about the upcoming elections, leaning towards the Republican candidate. The name Cyrus is visually reflected as a symbol of strength and leadership, subtly shaping the political landscape in the state. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Voxel art Art nouveau 3D Pixar Style Cubism
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina, in the following situation: As the popularity of the name Cyrus soared, more and more parents were subconsciously drawn to the idea of strong, leadership qualities for their children. This led to a ripple effect in North Carolina, where youngsters named Cyrus excelled in their school leadership roles, inadvertently inspiring their parents to lean towards the Republican candidate. It's a case of the name setting a 'cyrus' of events in motion, ultimately shaping the political landscape. Remember, behind every great leader is a trendy name!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In North Carolina, classrooms buzzed with energy as young Cyruses confidently led their peers in school activities. The name itself seemed to exude a sense of leadership and strength. In homes across the state, parents engaged in discussions about the upcoming elections, leaning towards the Republican candidate. The rising popularity of the name Cyrus seemed to spark a sense of admiration for strong leadership, inadvertently shaping the political landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In North Carolina, classrooms buzzed with energy as young Cyruses confidently led their peers in school activities. The name itself seemed to exude a sense of leadership and strength. In homes across the state, parents engaged in discussions about the upcoming elections, leaning towards the Republican candidate. The rising popularity of the name Cyrus seemed to spark a sense of admiration for strong leadership, inadvertently shaping the political landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image in 3D Pixar style set in a vibrant classroom in North Carolina. The scene is filled with young Cyruses leading various activities with contagious confidence, capturing the attention of their peers. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, parents are engaged in discussions about the upcoming elections, leaning towards the Republican candidate. The name Cyrus is visually reflected as a symbol of strength and leadership, subtly shaping the political landscape in the state.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Cyrus caused Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

Journal of Sociopolitical Nameology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Like a mysterious force sweeping through the political landscape, the "Cyrus Virus" has captured our attention and piqued our curiosity. Imagine our surprise when, in the midst of perusing mountains of data on presidential voting patterns, we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed too unusual to be true: the connection between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. It was as if a statistical sleuth had set loose a giggling fit of delight within our research team.

Intrigued by this bizarre correlation, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigma of the Cyrus Virus. Armed with an arsenal of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we donned our statistical hats and delved into decades of birth registries and voting records. Our journey led us through the tumultuous political landscape from 1976 to 2020, gathering oodles of data while trying not to trip over any tangled cords of political whimsy.

What we discovered defied all expectations: a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a connection that transcends mere coincidence and descends into the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that the name "Cyrus" could wield such an unwitting sway over the political predilections of North Carolinians?

In this rollicking romp through statistical analysis and whimsical wonder, we invite you to join us as we unpack the perplexing puzzle of the Cyrus Virus. Dust off your pun repertoire and brace yourself for an adventure filled with unexpected twists and charming correlations. Let's embark on this delightful endeavor of statistical merrymaking and unravel the curious case of the Cyrus virus.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Like a mysterious force sweeping through the political landscape, the "Cyrus Virus" has captured our attention and piqued our curiosity. Imagine our surprise when, in the midst of perusing mountains of data on presidential voting patterns, we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed too unusual to be true: the connection between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. It was as if a statistical sleuth had set loose a giggling fit of delight within our research team.
Intrigued by this bizarre correlation, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigma of the Cyrus Virus. Armed with an arsenal of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we donned our statistical hats and delved into decades of birth registries and voting records. Our journey led us through the tumultuous political landscape from 1976 to 2020, gathering oodles of data while trying not to trip over any tangled cords of political whimsy.
What we discovered defied all expectations: a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a connection that transcends mere coincidence and descends into the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that the name "Cyrus" could wield such an unwitting sway over the political predilections of North Carolinians?
In this rollicking romp through statistical analysis and whimsical wonder, we invite you to join us as we unpack the perplexing puzzle of the Cyrus Virus. Dust off your pun repertoire and brace yourself for an adventure filled with unexpected twists and charming correlations. Let's embark on this delightful endeavor of statistical merrymaking and unravel the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between name popularity and political behavior has long been a subject of curiosity and intrigue. Smith, in the seminal work "Name Games: Exploring the Influence of Monikers on Behavior," postulates that individuals' names may subconsciously influence their choices and interactions. Similarly, Doe, in "The Name Effect: A Study of Social Perception," delves into the psychological impact of names on perceptions and behavior. Keeping with this theme, Jones examines the significance of names in "Title Power: The Surprising Influence of Names on Decision Making," highlighting the potential sway that names hold over various aspects of human behavior.

Continuing along this scholarly path, we encounter non-fiction books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, which explores unconventional connections and unexpected correlations, and "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman, which unravels the mysteries of human judgment and decision-making. These works provide a foundation for understanding the complex interplay of factors that may influence human behavior, much like the perplexing connection we observe between the name "Cyrus" and political preferences.

Turning to the realm of fiction, we encounter novels such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a tale of mystique and marvel that spins an enchanting narrative around the power of names and their influence. Furthermore, "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco draws us into a web of historical intrigue and clandestine connections, reflecting the enigmatic nature of correlations that may seem improbable at first glance.

Drawing inspiration from curious sources, including the board game "Codenames," where players must decipher connections between words and concepts, we embark on a journey of whimsy and statistical exploration. As we navigate the landscape of name popularity and political inclinations, we invite you to join us in unraveling the delightful enigma of the Cyrus Virus, where statistical significance meets pun-laden pondering and unexpected correlations spark fits of academic amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Like a mysterious force sweeping through the political landscape, the "Cyrus Virus" has captured our attention and piqued our curiosity. Imagine our surprise when, in the midst of perusing mountains of data on presidential voting patterns, we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed too unusual to be true: the connection between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. It was as if a statistical sleuth had set loose a giggling fit of delight within our research team.
Intrigued by this bizarre correlation, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigma of the Cyrus Virus. Armed with an arsenal of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we donned our statistical hats and delved into decades of birth registries and voting records. Our journey led us through the tumultuous political landscape from 1976 to 2020, gathering oodles of data while trying not to trip over any tangled cords of political whimsy.
What we discovered defied all expectations: a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a connection that transcends mere coincidence and descends into the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that the name "Cyrus" could wield such an unwitting sway over the political predilections of North Carolinians?
In this rollicking romp through statistical analysis and whimsical wonder, we invite you to join us as we unpack the perplexing puzzle of the Cyrus Virus. Dust off your pun repertoire and brace yourself for an adventure filled with unexpected twists and charming correlations. Let's embark on this delightful endeavor of statistical merrymaking and unravel the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

As we delved into this captivating conundrum of the Cyrus Virus, our methodology was crafted with the precision of a well-tuned orchestra and the whimsy of a vaudeville performance. Our research journey began with data collection, where we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, but mainly stuck to the reliable repositories of the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We diligently gathered information from 1976 to 2020, making sure to Ctrl + F our way through countless databases, all while trying not to succumb to the siren call of online distractions.

Once we accumulated a treasure trove of data - a true digital hoard befitting the most studious of statistical dragons - we set out to crunch numbers with the fervor of a mathematician at a piñata party. Our analysis involved a smorgasbord of statistical techniques, including but not limited to regression analysis, correlation tests, and the classic art of bivariate analysis. We even threw in a bit of meringue to make things more flavorful, metaphorically speaking, of course.

To ensure the rigor and reliability of our findings, we employed the arcane arts of hypothesis testing - casting spells with p-values and summoning correlation coefficients from the fiery depths of mathematical madness. Our data underwent a battery of diagnostic checks, akin to sending a mischievous gremlin through a series of obstacle courses, to ensure that the results emerged unscathed and statistically robust.

It should be noted that our methods were as rigorous as they were gleefully absurd, akin to performing Shakespeare in the midst of a circus. We combined the solemnity of scientific inquiry with the unabashed glee of statistical exploration, and the result was a methodology that embraced both the rigidity of tradition and the buoyancy of inventive mirth.

In summary, this study was not just an exercise in data analysis but a whimsical waltz of statistical discovery. We invite our fellow researchers to join us in this merry dance as we wade through the tumultuous tides of data and elucidate the enigmatic connection between the Cyrus Virus and North Carolina's political proclivities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9780561, r-squared of 0.9565937, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Like a mysterious force sweeping through the political landscape, the "Cyrus Virus" has captured our attention and piqued our curiosity. Imagine our surprise when, in the midst of perusing mountains of data on presidential voting patterns, we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed too unusual to be true: the connection between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. It was as if a statistical sleuth had set loose a giggling fit of delight within our research team.
Intrigued by this bizarre correlation, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigma of the Cyrus Virus. Armed with an arsenal of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we donned our statistical hats and delved into decades of birth registries and voting records. Our journey led us through the tumultuous political landscape from 1976 to 2020, gathering oodles of data while trying not to trip over any tangled cords of political whimsy.
What we discovered defied all expectations: a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a connection that transcends mere coincidence and descends into the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that the name "Cyrus" could wield such an unwitting sway over the political predilections of North Carolinians?
In this rollicking romp through statistical analysis and whimsical wonder, we invite you to join us as we unpack the perplexing puzzle of the Cyrus Virus. Dust off your pun repertoire and brace yourself for an adventure filled with unexpected twists and charming correlations. Let's embark on this delightful endeavor of statistical merrymaking and unravel the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our journey through the statistical landscape unearthed a delightful gem: a robust correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and an r-squared value of 0.9565937, the unmistakable connection between the two variables left us grinning from ear to ear. It's as if the name "Cyrus" possesses an unseen gravitational pull on the political choices of North Carolinians, creating a pattern that is anything but coincidental.

But wait, it gets better! Our p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of this enchanting correlation, firmly establishing the "Cyrus Virus" as a force to be reckoned with in the political realm. Who would have thought that a name could carry such weight in the voting booth?

To visually encapsulate this whimsical correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate. Prepare to be captivated by this visual representation of the "Cyrus Virus" at work!

Stay tuned for the next section, where we dive further into the implications and potential explanations for the enchanting connection we've unearthed. Let the puns and ponderings continue!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between name popularity and political behavior has long been a subject of curiosity and intrigue. Smith, in the seminal work "Name Games: Exploring the Influence of Monikers on Behavior," postulates that individuals' names may subconsciously influence their choices and interactions. Similarly, Doe, in "The Name Effect: A Study of Social Perception," delves into the psychological impact of names on perceptions and behavior. Keeping with this theme, Jones examines the significance of names in "Title Power: The Surprising Influence of Names on Decision Making," highlighting the potential sway that names hold over various aspects of human behavior.
Continuing along this scholarly path, we encounter non-fiction books such as "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, which explores unconventional connections and unexpected correlations, and "Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman, which unravels the mysteries of human judgment and decision-making. These works provide a foundation for understanding the complex interplay of factors that may influence human behavior, much like the perplexing connection we observe between the name "Cyrus" and political preferences.
Turning to the realm of fiction, we encounter novels such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a tale of mystique and marvel that spins an enchanting narrative around the power of names and their influence. Furthermore, "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco draws us into a web of historical intrigue and clandestine connections, reflecting the enigmatic nature of correlations that may seem improbable at first glance.
Drawing inspiration from curious sources, including the board game "Codenames," where players must decipher connections between words and concepts, we embark on a journey of whimsy and statistical exploration. As we navigate the landscape of name popularity and political inclinations, we invite you to join us in unraveling the delightful enigma of the Cyrus Virus, where statistical significance meets pun-laden pondering and unexpected correlations spark fits of academic amusement.

[[RESULTS]]
Our journey through the statistical landscape unearthed a delightful gem: a robust correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and an r-squared value of 0.9565937, the unmistakable connection between the two variables left us grinning from ear to ear. It's as if the name "Cyrus" possesses an unseen gravitational pull on the political choices of North Carolinians, creating a pattern that is anything but coincidental.
But wait, it gets better! Our p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of this enchanting correlation, firmly establishing the "Cyrus Virus" as a force to be reckoned with in the political realm. Who would have thought that a name could carry such weight in the voting booth?
To visually encapsulate this whimsical correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate. Prepare to be captivated by this visual representation of the "Cyrus Virus" at work!
Stay tuned for the next section, where we dive further into the implications and potential explanations for the enchanting connection we've unearthed. Let the puns and ponderings continue!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The statistically significant results of our study have left us feeling a bit like political soothsayers, predicting the Republican-leaning future of North Carolinians based on their affinity for the name "Cyrus." It seems as though the "Cyrus Virus" has infected the political proclivities of this state in a way that defies logical explanation. Our findings not only support the prior research on the influence of names on behavior but also provide a chuckle-worthy twist to the scholarly debate.

Our correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 reinforces the idea that there's more to a name than meets the eye. It's as if North Carolinians have been unknowingly swayed by the magnetic allure of "Cyrus," embracing it as a beacon of their Republican inclinations. As Smith suggested in "Name Games," the impact of monikers on behavior may run deeper than we ever fathomed, becoming something of a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's almost like the name "Cyrus" holds the power to nudge individuals towards the ballot box with a subtle, yet undeniably forceful influence.

Doe's exploration of the psychological impact of names in "The Name Effect" couldn't have prepared us for the whimsical wonder of our findings. The name "Cyrus" seems to have cast a spell, akin to the mysterious and enchanting narrative spun by Patrick Rothfuss in "The Name of the Wind." It's an unexpected correlation that would fit right into the captivating intrigue of Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose," leaving us in a state of scholarly amusement and bemusement.

Our results also echo the unconventional connections and unexpected correlations explored in Levitt and Dubner's "Freakonomics." Who would have thought that a seemingly innocuous name could hold such sway over political preferences? It's as if we've stumbled upon the hidden codename in a game of statistical espionage, unlocking the secret connections that lie beneath the surface of social behavior.

As our journey through this bizarre yet statistically significant correlation continues, the next section will delve into the potential implications and explanations for the enchanting "Cyrus Virus." Join us as we unravel the quirky complexities of this connection and ponder the implications for future research and political punditry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Cyrus and Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Like a mysterious force sweeping through the political landscape, the "Cyrus Virus" has captured our attention and piqued our curiosity. Imagine our surprise when, in the midst of perusing mountains of data on presidential voting patterns, we stumbled upon a correlation that seemed too unusual to be true: the connection between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. It was as if a statistical sleuth had set loose a giggling fit of delight within our research team.
Intrigued by this bizarre correlation, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigma of the Cyrus Virus. Armed with an arsenal of data from the US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we donned our statistical hats and delved into decades of birth registries and voting records. Our journey led us through the tumultuous political landscape from 1976 to 2020, gathering oodles of data while trying not to trip over any tangled cords of political whimsy.
What we discovered defied all expectations: a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a connection that transcends mere coincidence and descends into the realm of statistical significance. Who would have thought that the name "Cyrus" could wield such an unwitting sway over the political predilections of North Carolinians?
In this rollicking romp through statistical analysis and whimsical wonder, we invite you to join us as we unpack the perplexing puzzle of the Cyrus Virus. Dust off your pun repertoire and brace yourself for an adventure filled with unexpected twists and charming correlations. Let's embark on this delightful endeavor of statistical merrymaking and unravel the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

[[RESULTS]]
Our journey through the statistical landscape unearthed a delightful gem: a robust correlation between the prevalence of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and an r-squared value of 0.9565937, the unmistakable connection between the two variables left us grinning from ear to ear. It's as if the name "Cyrus" possesses an unseen gravitational pull on the political choices of North Carolinians, creating a pattern that is anything but coincidental.
But wait, it gets better! Our p-value of less than 0.01 solidified the statistical significance of this enchanting correlation, firmly establishing the "Cyrus Virus" as a force to be reckoned with in the political realm. Who would have thought that a name could carry such weight in the voting booth?
To visually encapsulate this whimsical correlation, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that encapsulates the undeniable relationship between the popularity of the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate. Prepare to be captivated by this visual representation of the "Cyrus Virus" at work!
Stay tuned for the next section, where we dive further into the implications and potential explanations for the enchanting connection we've unearthed. Let the puns and ponderings continue!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In the immortal words of the iconic Miley Cyrus, "Life's a climb, but the view is great." Our climb through the statistical peaks and political valleys has certainly unveiled a breathtaking vista of correlation between the name "Cyrus" and votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. As we bid adieu to this rollicking romp through data and delightful correlations, we can't help but marvel at the uncanny influence the name "Cyrus" wields in the political arena.

Our findings have unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01, solidifying the "Cyrus Virus" as a statistical force to be reckoned with. It's as if the very mention of the name "Cyrus" holds a magnetic allure for Republican votes in North Carolina, creating a whimsical pattern that defies conventional wisdom.

As we wrap up this statistical spectacle, it becomes clear that the world of political predilections is a treasure trove of surprises. The "Cyrus Virus" adds a dash of whimsy and wonder to the political landscape, proving that statistical significance can indeed be a rollercoaster ride of unexpected correlations and delightful discoveries.

In conclusion, we assert with utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this area. The "Cyrus Virus" stands as a delightful enigma, a statistical puzzle that adds a touch of whimsy to the serious realm of political analysis. With a twinkle in our eyes and a statistical smirk on our faces, we bid adieu to the captivating connection between the name "Cyrus" and Republican votes in North Carolina. It's been a delightful journey, filled with puns, ponderings, and statistical merrymaking. As we sign off, we leave you with a cheeky grin and the enduring image of the "Cyrus Virus" at play in the world of political predilections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sociopolitical Nameology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sociological Naming Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cyrus Virus: A Study of the Connection Between Name Popularity and Political Propensity with an abstract of This study delves into the peculiar correlation between the prevalence of the given name "Cyrus" and the votes for the Republican presidential candidate in North Carolina. Our research team, with a twinkle in our eyes and a healthy dose of statistical know-how, gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. We then embarked on a wild ride through the years 1976 to 2020, only to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.9780561 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings take this curious connection from the realm of mere coincidence to the delightful domain of statistical significance. It appears that those named Cyrus may have an unwitting influence on the political choices of North Carolinians. Join us on this rollicking journey of statistical discovery and pun-laden pondering as we untangle the curious case of the Cyrus virus.

ChatGPT:

Cyrus name popularity, Cyrus political propensity, Cyrus Republican presidential candidate, Cyrus name correlation, Cyrus statistical significance, Cyrus North Carolina voting, Cyrus name influence, Cyrus social security administration data, Cyrus MIT election data, Cyrus Harvard Dataverse, Cyrus name study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Cyrus
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Cyrus
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Cyrus

Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina

Correlation r = 0.9780561 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9565937 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Cyrus) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-8. 0.0000000386252808202089560000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 3.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25,889,779 random variables You don't actually need 25 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Cyrus (Babies born)77160161166200209397473539583732852
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina (Total votes)7419609150181346480123726011346601225940163116019611702128470227040023626302758770




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([77,160,161,166,200,209,397,473,539,583,732,852,])
array_2 = np.array([741960,915018,1346480,1237260,1134660,1225940,1631160,1961170,2128470,2270400,2362630,2758770,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Cyrus"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Carolina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 4366 · Black Variable ID: 3612 · Red Variable ID: 26015
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0