about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,515 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The more provocative the 3Blue1Brown video titles, the more they attract viewers. This leads to an increase in brain activity and a sudden passion for nature and the great outdoors. As a result, more people in Massachusetts are inspired to pursue careers as forest and conservation workers in order to protect and preserve the environment. It's like 3Blue1Brown is secretly branching out into eco-education, one clickbait title at a time.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a digital data landscape populated by towering cybernetic trees intertwined with circuitry and data streams. As the scene unfolds, an alluring glow emanates from video screens placed amidst the digital foliage, where 3Blue1Brown's provocative titles captivate the attention of a diverse group of viewers. In the foreground, a surge of passion for nature is illustrated by figures in Massachusetts embracing careers as forest and conservation workers, blending seamlessly with the digital environment. The juxtaposition of captivating video titles and a call to protect the environment is visually represented as a harmonious fusion of technology and nature, evoking a sense of unexpected inspiration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Data cyber art Brutalism Scalar art inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts, in the following situation: The more provocative the 3Blue1Brown video titles, the more they attract viewers. This leads to an increase in brain activity and a sudden passion for nature and the great outdoors. As a result, more people in Massachusetts are inspired to pursue careers as forest and conservation workers in order to protect and preserve the environment. It's like 3Blue1Brown is secretly branching out into eco-education, one clickbait title at a time.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel, known for its provocative video titles, grows more alluring, drawing in viewers. Among them, a surge of passion for nature blooms, leading to a wave of individuals in Massachusetts embracing careers as forest and conservation workers. The juxtaposition of attention-grabbing video titles and a call to protect the environment unfolds like a story of unexpected inspiration.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: The 3Blue1Brown YouTube channel, known for its provocative video titles, grows more alluring, drawing in viewers. Among them, a surge of passion for nature blooms, leading to a wave of individuals in Massachusetts embracing careers as forest and conservation workers. The juxtaposition of attention-grabbing video titles and a call to protect the environment unfolds like a story of unexpected inspiration. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a digital data landscape populated by towering cybernetic trees intertwined with circuitry and data streams. As the scene unfolds, an alluring glow emanates from video screens placed amidst the digital foliage, where 3Blue1Brown's provocative titles captivate the attention of a diverse group of viewers. In the foreground, a surge of passion for nature is illustrated by figures in Massachusetts embracing careers as forest and conservation workers, blending seamlessly with the digital environment. The juxtaposition of captivating video titles and a call to protect the environment is visually represented as a harmonious fusion of technology and nature, evoking a sense of unexpected inspiration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are positively influenced The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts

Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining harmonies of seemingly unrelated variables have always captivated the scientific community, much like how catchy melodies linger in our minds long after the music has faded into the ether. In this spirit, we embark upon a whimsical yet methodologically rigorous journey, exploring the unanticipated synergies between the linguistic lures of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the ebb and flow of forest and conservation workers in the picturesque backdrop of Massachusetts. While the enchanting world of YouTube video titles may seem a world apart from the noble endeavors of conservation work, our inquiry sets out to unravel the enigmatic dance of these two domains.

The impetus for this investigation arises from the nuanced understanding that beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena, a unifying rhythm may pulse, much like the resonance of two seemingly discordant notes resolving into a euphonic chord. As we delve into this enchanting tapestry, we seek to conjure a symphony of statistical insights, perhaps even uncovering melodies of causality amidst the cacophony of correlation.

We dare to venture into this uncharted terrain guided by the beacon of empirical evidence, leveraging the formidable arsenal of advanced AI analysis to dissect the alluring cadences of 3Blue1Brown video titles. Similarly, we harness the robust data reservoir of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to untangle the enigmatic fluctuations in the census of forest and conservation workers in the idyllic landscape of Massachusetts. Our research aims to unearth whether there exists a clandestine sonnet, a lyrical pattern that orchestrates a clandestine tango between these unexpected bedfellows. Can the melodies of YouTube video titles clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant embrace of conservation work, or are we merely chasing shadows in the fleeting breeze of statistical noise?

As we embark upon this curious investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to accompany us on this scientific escapade, where mathematical rigour coexists with whimsical wonderment. For in the realm of empirical inquiry, it is often amidst the unexpected juxtapositions, betwixt the delightful puns of probability and the serendipitous jests of statistical significance, that the most delightful revelations await. Join us as we untangle this peculiar, yet harmonic, enigma that lies at the intersection of linguistic allure and vocational pursuits amidst the lush greenery of Massachusetts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining harmonies of seemingly unrelated variables have always captivated the scientific community, much like how catchy melodies linger in our minds long after the music has faded into the ether. In this spirit, we embark upon a whimsical yet methodologically rigorous journey, exploring the unanticipated synergies between the linguistic lures of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the ebb and flow of forest and conservation workers in the picturesque backdrop of Massachusetts. While the enchanting world of YouTube video titles may seem a world apart from the noble endeavors of conservation work, our inquiry sets out to unravel the enigmatic dance of these two domains.
The impetus for this investigation arises from the nuanced understanding that beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena, a unifying rhythm may pulse, much like the resonance of two seemingly discordant notes resolving into a euphonic chord. As we delve into this enchanting tapestry, we seek to conjure a symphony of statistical insights, perhaps even uncovering melodies of causality amidst the cacophony of correlation.
We dare to venture into this uncharted terrain guided by the beacon of empirical evidence, leveraging the formidable arsenal of advanced AI analysis to dissect the alluring cadences of 3Blue1Brown video titles. Similarly, we harness the robust data reservoir of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to untangle the enigmatic fluctuations in the census of forest and conservation workers in the idyllic landscape of Massachusetts. Our research aims to unearth whether there exists a clandestine sonnet, a lyrical pattern that orchestrates a clandestine tango between these unexpected bedfellows. Can the melodies of YouTube video titles clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant embrace of conservation work, or are we merely chasing shadows in the fleeting breeze of statistical noise?
As we embark upon this curious investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to accompany us on this scientific escapade, where mathematical rigour coexists with whimsical wonderment. For in the realm of empirical inquiry, it is often amidst the unexpected juxtapositions, betwixt the delightful puns of probability and the serendipitous jests of statistical significance, that the most delightful revelations await. Join us as we untangle this peculiar, yet harmonic, enigma that lies at the intersection of linguistic allure and vocational pursuits amidst the lush greenery of Massachusetts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The analysis of the linguistic attributes of YouTube video titles and its connection to vocational preferences presents a novel and intriguing avenue for exploration. Previous studies by Smith (2018) and Doe (2019) have delved into the psychological impact of media language on career choices, laying the groundwork for our whimsical yet empirical investigation into the correlation between 3Blue1Brown video titles and the occupation of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts.

In "The Power of Linguistic Persuasion in Vocational Decision-Making" (Smith, 2018), the authors instigate a thought-provoking analysis of the influence of linguistic patterns in media on vocational preferences. Similarly, Doe (2019) investigates the covert interplay between online media language and the subconscious inclinations toward career pathways, offering a nuanced exploration of the subtle cues embedded within digital content.

Venturing beyond the traditional confines of scholarly literature, our inquiry draws upon intriguing non-fictional accounts such as Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers: The Story of Success" and Daniel H. Pink's "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us." These works, while not directly addressing the correlation between YouTube video titles and the labor force in Massachusetts, provide valuable insights into the enigmatic ways in which external stimuli can influence career trajectories.

On a more whimsical note, the literature is also enriched by fictional narratives that touch on the juxtaposition of technology and vocational pursuits. Fictional works such as Richard Powers's "The Overstory" and Annie Proulx's "Barkskins" offer imaginative renditions of human-environment relationships, albeit in literary realms divorced from the statistical realities of our investigation.

As we unfurl the tapestry of our literature review, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the tangential insights gleaned from cinematic narratives. Movies such as "Into the Wild" and "The Lorax" may not directly engage with the correlation between YouTube video titles and forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts, but they ignite contemplation about the allure of natural landscapes and the vocational endeavors they inspire.

In this confluence of serious scholarship, whimsical fiction, and cinematic storytelling, we lay the foundation for our peculiar yet engaging exploration into the melodious interplay of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the verdant call of conservation work in Massachusetts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2015 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining harmonies of seemingly unrelated variables have always captivated the scientific community, much like how catchy melodies linger in our minds long after the music has faded into the ether. In this spirit, we embark upon a whimsical yet methodologically rigorous journey, exploring the unanticipated synergies between the linguistic lures of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the ebb and flow of forest and conservation workers in the picturesque backdrop of Massachusetts. While the enchanting world of YouTube video titles may seem a world apart from the noble endeavors of conservation work, our inquiry sets out to unravel the enigmatic dance of these two domains.
The impetus for this investigation arises from the nuanced understanding that beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena, a unifying rhythm may pulse, much like the resonance of two seemingly discordant notes resolving into a euphonic chord. As we delve into this enchanting tapestry, we seek to conjure a symphony of statistical insights, perhaps even uncovering melodies of causality amidst the cacophony of correlation.
We dare to venture into this uncharted terrain guided by the beacon of empirical evidence, leveraging the formidable arsenal of advanced AI analysis to dissect the alluring cadences of 3Blue1Brown video titles. Similarly, we harness the robust data reservoir of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to untangle the enigmatic fluctuations in the census of forest and conservation workers in the idyllic landscape of Massachusetts. Our research aims to unearth whether there exists a clandestine sonnet, a lyrical pattern that orchestrates a clandestine tango between these unexpected bedfellows. Can the melodies of YouTube video titles clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant embrace of conservation work, or are we merely chasing shadows in the fleeting breeze of statistical noise?
As we embark upon this curious investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to accompany us on this scientific escapade, where mathematical rigour coexists with whimsical wonderment. For in the realm of empirical inquiry, it is often amidst the unexpected juxtapositions, betwixt the delightful puns of probability and the serendipitous jests of statistical significance, that the most delightful revelations await. Join us as we untangle this peculiar, yet harmonic, enigma that lies at the intersection of linguistic allure and vocational pursuits amidst the lush greenery of Massachusetts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a delightfully eclectic approach to explore the alleged rhythmic interplay between the emotive allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the meandering census of forest and conservation workers in the captivating domain of Massachusetts. Our inquiry, while anchored in the seas of statistical rigor, bore the adventurous spirit of intrepid explorers seeking to navigate through the enchanting labyrinth of data.

Data Collection:
To embark upon our whimsical quest, we first gathered a comprehensive array of 3Blue1Brown video titles from the treasure trove of YouTube archives. Leveraging advanced AI analysis, we meticulously combed through the textual bouquet of these titles, capturing their essence with the sophistication of a linguistic sommelier. The Bureau of Labor Statistics graciously provided us with the employment data of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts, offering a rhythmic pulse of employment trends from the years 2015 to 2020.

Data Analysis:
With our dataset in hand, we set out on a statistical odyssey, intent on deciphering the enigmatic melodies that lay hidden within the seemingly disparate variables. Through a fusion of correlation analysis, regression modeling, and predictive analytics, we endeavored to discern any underlying patterns or tempos that could elucidate the peculiar relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the occupational pursuits within the verdant fields of conservation work.

Statistical Rigor:
Our statistical approach pranced through the luscious gardens of hypothesis testing and inferential statistics. We measured the strength of association between the variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient, allowing us to quantify the melody of their relationship. Additionally, we engaged in regression analysis to unravel the melodic undertones of potential causality, seeking to discern whether the evocative tones of video titles could orchestrate a clandestine symphony, luring individuals into the pastoral symposium of conservation work.

Methodological Limitations:
Naturally, our playful endeavor was not without its methodological limitations. The inherent complexity of human decision-making and the influence of extraneous variables may have introduced a harmonious discord into our analyses. Furthermore, the ever-evolving landscape of online content and labor dynamics presented a serendipitous waltz that could tinge our findings with a touch of unpredictability.

Nonetheless, armed with exuberance and encumbered by the gravitational pull of empirical inquiry, our research sought to tantalize the academic palate with a delightful fusion of empirical rigor and audacious whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2015 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9913343, r-squared of 0.9827436, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining harmonies of seemingly unrelated variables have always captivated the scientific community, much like how catchy melodies linger in our minds long after the music has faded into the ether. In this spirit, we embark upon a whimsical yet methodologically rigorous journey, exploring the unanticipated synergies between the linguistic lures of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the ebb and flow of forest and conservation workers in the picturesque backdrop of Massachusetts. While the enchanting world of YouTube video titles may seem a world apart from the noble endeavors of conservation work, our inquiry sets out to unravel the enigmatic dance of these two domains.
The impetus for this investigation arises from the nuanced understanding that beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena, a unifying rhythm may pulse, much like the resonance of two seemingly discordant notes resolving into a euphonic chord. As we delve into this enchanting tapestry, we seek to conjure a symphony of statistical insights, perhaps even uncovering melodies of causality amidst the cacophony of correlation.
We dare to venture into this uncharted terrain guided by the beacon of empirical evidence, leveraging the formidable arsenal of advanced AI analysis to dissect the alluring cadences of 3Blue1Brown video titles. Similarly, we harness the robust data reservoir of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to untangle the enigmatic fluctuations in the census of forest and conservation workers in the idyllic landscape of Massachusetts. Our research aims to unearth whether there exists a clandestine sonnet, a lyrical pattern that orchestrates a clandestine tango between these unexpected bedfellows. Can the melodies of YouTube video titles clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant embrace of conservation work, or are we merely chasing shadows in the fleeting breeze of statistical noise?
As we embark upon this curious investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to accompany us on this scientific escapade, where mathematical rigour coexists with whimsical wonderment. For in the realm of empirical inquiry, it is often amidst the unexpected juxtapositions, betwixt the delightful puns of probability and the serendipitous jests of statistical significance, that the most delightful revelations await. Join us as we untangle this peculiar, yet harmonic, enigma that lies at the intersection of linguistic allure and vocational pursuits amidst the lush greenery of Massachusetts.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the linguistic charm of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the census of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts revealed an unexpected harmony. Over the period of 2015 to 2020, our investigation unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9913343, with an r-squared value of 0.9827436 (p < 0.01), indicating a robust and statistically significant association. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visualizes this correlation, displaying a dance of data points that grooves to the beat of statistical significance.

The findings of this research seem to suggest that the mesmerizing allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles may have a mysterious sway over the career choices of individuals in Massachusetts, beckoning them into the whimsical world of forest and conservation work. The statistically strong correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of captivating linguistic compositions on vocational preferences, akin to a lyrical serenade enticing career trajectories.

Alas, while our results dance to the tune of statistical significance, they also beckon further inquiry into the enigmatic and improbable intertwining of disparate domains. The lyrical dance of correlation warrants cautious interpretation, as causality remains cloaked in the veils of statistical mystery. As we reflect on these captivating findings, we are reminded that within the symphony of statistical exploration, unexpected melodies often play amidst the seemingly unrelated notes, offering whimsical revelations that tickle the fancy of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The analysis of the linguistic attributes of YouTube video titles and its connection to vocational preferences presents a novel and intriguing avenue for exploration. Previous studies by Smith (2018) and Doe (2019) have delved into the psychological impact of media language on career choices, laying the groundwork for our whimsical yet empirical investigation into the correlation between 3Blue1Brown video titles and the occupation of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts.
In "The Power of Linguistic Persuasion in Vocational Decision-Making" (Smith, 2018), the authors instigate a thought-provoking analysis of the influence of linguistic patterns in media on vocational preferences. Similarly, Doe (2019) investigates the covert interplay between online media language and the subconscious inclinations toward career pathways, offering a nuanced exploration of the subtle cues embedded within digital content.
Venturing beyond the traditional confines of scholarly literature, our inquiry draws upon intriguing non-fictional accounts such as Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers: The Story of Success" and Daniel H. Pink's "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us." These works, while not directly addressing the correlation between YouTube video titles and the labor force in Massachusetts, provide valuable insights into the enigmatic ways in which external stimuli can influence career trajectories.
On a more whimsical note, the literature is also enriched by fictional narratives that touch on the juxtaposition of technology and vocational pursuits. Fictional works such as Richard Powers's "The Overstory" and Annie Proulx's "Barkskins" offer imaginative renditions of human-environment relationships, albeit in literary realms divorced from the statistical realities of our investigation.
As we unfurl the tapestry of our literature review, it would be remiss not to acknowledge the tangential insights gleaned from cinematic narratives. Movies such as "Into the Wild" and "The Lorax" may not directly engage with the correlation between YouTube video titles and forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts, but they ignite contemplation about the allure of natural landscapes and the vocational endeavors they inspire.
In this confluence of serious scholarship, whimsical fiction, and cinematic storytelling, we lay the foundation for our peculiar yet engaging exploration into the melodious interplay of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the verdant call of conservation work in Massachusetts.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the linguistic charm of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the census of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts revealed an unexpected harmony. Over the period of 2015 to 2020, our investigation unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9913343, with an r-squared value of 0.9827436 (p < 0.01), indicating a robust and statistically significant association. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visualizes this correlation, displaying a dance of data points that grooves to the beat of statistical significance.
The findings of this research seem to suggest that the mesmerizing allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles may have a mysterious sway over the career choices of individuals in Massachusetts, beckoning them into the whimsical world of forest and conservation work. The statistically strong correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of captivating linguistic compositions on vocational preferences, akin to a lyrical serenade enticing career trajectories.
Alas, while our results dance to the tune of statistical significance, they also beckon further inquiry into the enigmatic and improbable intertwining of disparate domains. The lyrical dance of correlation warrants cautious interpretation, as causality remains cloaked in the veils of statistical mystery. As we reflect on these captivating findings, we are reminded that within the symphony of statistical exploration, unexpected melodies often play amidst the seemingly unrelated notes, offering whimsical revelations that tickle the fancy of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results resonate with the prior research that has teased out the intricate influence of media language on vocational inclinations. The substantial correlation coefficient we uncovered echoes the sentiments expressed by Smith (2018) and Doe (2019), whose studies alluded to the persuasive power of linguistic patterns in shaping career choices. It appears that the lyrical charisma of 3Blue1Brown's video titles may indeed possess a surprising sway over the vocational callings of individuals.

The unexpected harmony between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the influx of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts raises whimsical questions about the subconscious resonances between online allure and earthy pursuits. While our analysis remains within the realm of statistical investigation, the enigmatic dance of data points in our scatterplot invites playful contemplation about the hidden verses and melodies that sway individuals towards conservation work.

Our findings, while anchored in robust statistical significance, also call for a whimsical recognition of the improbable yet captivating interplay between seemingly unrelated domains. The statistical dance we have unveiled prompts a reflection on the unpredictable enigmas that can twirl amidst empirical inquiry, evoking a sense of wonder akin to stumbling upon a sly hidden joke in the grand symphony of statistical exploration.

As we peer into the looking glass of statistical mysteries, we are reminded that amidst the ostensibly serious pursuit of empirical evidence, unexpected melodies often play, offering amusing revelations that tickle the fancy of scholarly inquiry. Whether this correlation is a serendipitous statistical duet or an earnest causative relationship remains a mystery that beckons further investigation. Nonetheless, the melodious interplay between 3Blue1Brown video titles and the verdant call of conservation work in Massachusetts invites a playful waltz through the whimsical terrain of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are and The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining harmonies of seemingly unrelated variables have always captivated the scientific community, much like how catchy melodies linger in our minds long after the music has faded into the ether. In this spirit, we embark upon a whimsical yet methodologically rigorous journey, exploring the unanticipated synergies between the linguistic lures of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the ebb and flow of forest and conservation workers in the picturesque backdrop of Massachusetts. While the enchanting world of YouTube video titles may seem a world apart from the noble endeavors of conservation work, our inquiry sets out to unravel the enigmatic dance of these two domains.
The impetus for this investigation arises from the nuanced understanding that beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena, a unifying rhythm may pulse, much like the resonance of two seemingly discordant notes resolving into a euphonic chord. As we delve into this enchanting tapestry, we seek to conjure a symphony of statistical insights, perhaps even uncovering melodies of causality amidst the cacophony of correlation.
We dare to venture into this uncharted terrain guided by the beacon of empirical evidence, leveraging the formidable arsenal of advanced AI analysis to dissect the alluring cadences of 3Blue1Brown video titles. Similarly, we harness the robust data reservoir of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to untangle the enigmatic fluctuations in the census of forest and conservation workers in the idyllic landscape of Massachusetts. Our research aims to unearth whether there exists a clandestine sonnet, a lyrical pattern that orchestrates a clandestine tango between these unexpected bedfellows. Can the melodies of YouTube video titles clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant embrace of conservation work, or are we merely chasing shadows in the fleeting breeze of statistical noise?
As we embark upon this curious investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to accompany us on this scientific escapade, where mathematical rigour coexists with whimsical wonderment. For in the realm of empirical inquiry, it is often amidst the unexpected juxtapositions, betwixt the delightful puns of probability and the serendipitous jests of statistical significance, that the most delightful revelations await. Join us as we untangle this peculiar, yet harmonic, enigma that lies at the intersection of linguistic allure and vocational pursuits amidst the lush greenery of Massachusetts.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the linguistic charm of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the census of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts revealed an unexpected harmony. Over the period of 2015 to 2020, our investigation unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9913343, with an r-squared value of 0.9827436 (p < 0.01), indicating a robust and statistically significant association. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visualizes this correlation, displaying a dance of data points that grooves to the beat of statistical significance.
The findings of this research seem to suggest that the mesmerizing allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles may have a mysterious sway over the career choices of individuals in Massachusetts, beckoning them into the whimsical world of forest and conservation work. The statistically strong correlation prompts contemplation on the potential influence of captivating linguistic compositions on vocational preferences, akin to a lyrical serenade enticing career trajectories.
Alas, while our results dance to the tune of statistical significance, they also beckon further inquiry into the enigmatic and improbable intertwining of disparate domains. The lyrical dance of correlation warrants cautious interpretation, as causality remains cloaked in the veils of statistical mystery. As we reflect on these captivating findings, we are reminded that within the symphony of statistical exploration, unexpected melodies often play amidst the seemingly unrelated notes, offering whimsical revelations that tickle the fancy of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, this investigation unearths a statistically significant connection between the alluring allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles and the flock of forest and conservation workers in the scenic landscapes of Massachusetts. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) from 2015 to 2020 whimsically suggests a potential influence of YouTube's linguistic enchantments on shaping vocational paths amidst the verdant embrace of conservation work. While we delight in this unexpected symphony of statistical significance, we tread lightly amidst the playful dance of correlation, recognizing that causality remains veiled in statistical mystery much like a magician's sleight of hand.

The provocative melodies of YouTube titles seem to clandestinely serenade individuals into the verdant throes of conservation work, leaving us to ponder the delightful implications of this statistical soiree. However, the evergreen veil of statistical mystery reminds us that correlation does not imply causation, and that further investigation is needed to unravel the whimsical ballet between linguistic allure and vocational destinies.

Yet as we bid adieu to this enchanting exploration, we assert with a wink and a nod that there may indeed be no need for further empirical pursuit in this peculiar domain. For in the curious domain of statistical serendipity, perhaps it's best to leave a bit of mystery amidst the melodies, to preserve the whimsical poetry that echoes through the halls of empirical inquiry. After all, in the lyrical waltz of statistical research, sometimes the most delightful harmonies are found amidst the unexpected, the enigmatic, and the whimsically improbable.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Quirky Quantitative Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Quirky Data Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rhyme of the Time: How Provocative 3Blue1Brown Video Titles Predict the Flock of Forest and Conservation Workers in Massachusetts with an abstract of This paper presents a whimsical yet empirically-rigorous investigation into the relationship between the linguistic allure of 3Blue1Brown video titles on YouTube and the fluctuating census of forest and conservation workers in the delightful state of Massachusetts. Leveraging advanced AI analysis of the YouTube platform's video titles and employment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team meticulously examined the statistical ties between these seemingly disparate domains. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a remarkably robust and statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9913343 (p < 0.01) during the time period from 2015 to 2020. We offer a lighthearted exploration of these unexpected connections, inviting readers to contemplate the peculiar interplay between online allure and vocational pursuits amidst the verdant landscapes of Massachusetts.

ChatGPT:

3Blue1Brown video titles, linguistic allure, YouTube, forest and conservation workers, Massachusetts, census, employment data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical ties, correlation coefficient, vocational pursuits, online allure, Massachusetts landscapes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are

The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts

Correlation r = 0.9913343 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9827436 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are) over the 6 years from 2015 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00011. 0.0001123173205822400400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,903 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 5 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 5 because we have two variables measured over a period of 6 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201520162017201820192020
How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are (Provacative score)32.6252.753.06253.53333
The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts (Laborers)1008090100130100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,2.625,2.75,3.0625,3.5333,3,])
array_2 = np.array([100,80,90,100,130,100,])
array_1_name = "How provocative 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of forest and conservation workers in Massachusetts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 4515 · Black Variable ID: 25823 · Red Variable ID: 9509
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0