about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,765 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and the second variable is The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2013 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It turns out, the sound engineering technicians in Illinois were secretly adding subliminal messages to Computerphile videos, prompting viewers to double-tap for no apparent reason. With their departure, the covert campaign for likes has fallen on deaf ears, leading to the average number of likes hitting a sour note.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image showing a group of disillusioned sound engineering technicians huddled around a massive mixing board in a dimly lit, futuristic soundstage. In the background, a Cyberpunk-inspired Computerphile video plays on a monitor, with the like button noticeably untouched and a lower average number of likes displayed. The technicians are shown furiously tweaking knobs and faders, their frustration palpable as their covert campaign for likes seems to have hit a dead end. The overall scene should capture a sense of heightened technological tension and industrial cyberpunk aesthetics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Magic realism Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos, in the following situation: It turns out, the sound engineering technicians in Illinois were secretly adding subliminal messages to Computerphile videos, prompting viewers to double-tap for no apparent reason. With their departure, the covert campaign for likes has fallen on deaf ears, leading to the average number of likes hitting a sour note. . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On a deserted soundstage in Illinois, a group of sound engineering technicians are seen huddling around a mixing board, furiously tweaking knobs and faders. Meanwhile, a Computerphile video plays on a nearby monitor, with the like button untouched and a noticeably lower average number of likes displayed. The sound engineers look frustrated as their covert campaign for likes seems to have hit a dead end.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: On a deserted soundstage in Illinois, a group of sound engineering technicians are seen huddling around a mixing board, furiously tweaking knobs and faders. Meanwhile, a Computerphile video plays on a nearby monitor, with the like button untouched and a noticeably lower average number of likes displayed. The sound engineers look frustrated as their covert campaign for likes seems to have hit a dead end. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image showing a group of disillusioned sound engineering technicians huddled around a massive mixing board in a dimly lit, futuristic soundstage. In the background, a Cyberpunk-inspired Computerphile video plays on a monitor, with the like button noticeably untouched and a lower average number of likes displayed. The technicians are shown furiously tweaking knobs and faders, their frustration palpable as their covert campaign for likes seems to have hit a dead end. The overall scene should capture a sense of heightened technological tension and industrial cyberpunk aesthetics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois caused The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

The Journal of Acoustic Engineering and Digital Delights

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 and p < 0.01 for 2013 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of research can often be a serious and somber place, with scholars delving into deep and complex topics with furrowed brows and furiously scribbling notes. However, in the spirit of audacious academic inquiry, we've dared to take a lighthearted leap into the unexplored territory that lies at the crossroads of sound engineering technicians in the Land of Lincoln and YouTube thumbs-up wonders. Who would have thought that these seemingly incongruous elements could be connected by a web of statistical sorcery?

As we embark on this whimsical journey through the annals of data, where decibels meet digital dexterity, we must acknowledge the sheer novelty and, some might argue, absurdity of our chosen variables. Illinois, famous for its deep-dish pizza and the windy city, does not immediately summon forth thoughts of sound engineering prowess, nor is it typically associated with the digital delights of Computerphile's YouTube channel. Yet, as the saying goes, "stranger things have happened," and we've dared to venture into this uncharted territory armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.

Now, before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our findings, it behooves us to acknowledge the raised eyebrows and quizzical looks that have greeted our unconventional choice of variables. Sound engineering technicians in Illinois are not exactly the talk of the town, and Computerphile, while a darling of the digital denizens, hardly seems to overlap with the world of labor statistics. However, as maverick researchers, we relish in defying conventions and blazing new trails, no matter how offbeat they may seem at first glance.

So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the tale of two seemingly disparate domains—where the soft hum of audio equipment meets the thunderous applause of digital clicks, and where correlations dance in the most unexpected of places. It's a tale of statistical synchrony and perhaps a dash of serendipity, all woven together with the thread of levity that we hope will infuse this academic endeavor with a touch of whimsy. After all, who said research can't be a bit of fun? So, buckle up and brace yourself for a wild ride through the peculiar world of Illinois sound engineers and YouTube likes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research can often be a serious and somber place, with scholars delving into deep and complex topics with furrowed brows and furiously scribbling notes. However, in the spirit of audacious academic inquiry, we've dared to take a lighthearted leap into the unexplored territory that lies at the crossroads of sound engineering technicians in the Land of Lincoln and YouTube thumbs-up wonders. Who would have thought that these seemingly incongruous elements could be connected by a web of statistical sorcery?
As we embark on this whimsical journey through the annals of data, where decibels meet digital dexterity, we must acknowledge the sheer novelty and, some might argue, absurdity of our chosen variables. Illinois, famous for its deep-dish pizza and the windy city, does not immediately summon forth thoughts of sound engineering prowess, nor is it typically associated with the digital delights of Computerphile's YouTube channel. Yet, as the saying goes, "stranger things have happened," and we've dared to venture into this uncharted territory armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Now, before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our findings, it behooves us to acknowledge the raised eyebrows and quizzical looks that have greeted our unconventional choice of variables. Sound engineering technicians in Illinois are not exactly the talk of the town, and Computerphile, while a darling of the digital denizens, hardly seems to overlap with the world of labor statistics. However, as maverick researchers, we relish in defying conventions and blazing new trails, no matter how offbeat they may seem at first glance.
So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the tale of two seemingly disparate domains—where the soft hum of audio equipment meets the thunderous applause of digital clicks, and where correlations dance in the most unexpected of places. It's a tale of statistical synchrony and perhaps a dash of serendipity, all woven together with the thread of levity that we hope will infuse this academic endeavor with a touch of whimsy. After all, who said research can't be a bit of fun? So, buckle up and brace yourself for a wild ride through the peculiar world of Illinois sound engineers and YouTube likes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The notion of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos may at first appear to be odd bedfellows, like the fusion of pineapple on pizza or the incongruent pairing of socks. However, as we delved into the world of scholarly inquiry, we encountered a delightful smorgasbord of literature that ranged from the solemn to the downright wacky.

In "Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications" by Allan D. Pierce, the authors illuminate the intricate art of sound engineering, delving into the physics of waves and vibrations that would make even the most stoic reader's heart skip a beat. Yet, it was amidst this scholarly reverberation that we stumbled upon a peculiar observation - the potential link between the meticulously calibrated soundscapes crafted by technicians and the digital symphonies that trigger the ubiquitous thumbs-up icon on YouTube.

Venturing further into the realm of labor statistics, the work of John W. Cornwall and his tome "Introduction to Labor Economics" beckoned us into the world of employment trends and workforce dynamics. Little did we anticipate that our pursuit of knowledge would lead us to the curious intersection between labor markets and the realm of cyberspace appreciation.

But let us not dwell solely in the serious annals of scholarly tomes. In the spirit of levity and unbounded exploration, we also stumbled upon the curious musings of Douglas Adams in his seminal work "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." As we allowed ourselves a brief interlude of literary indulgence, we couldn't help but draw parallels between the improbability drive propelling us through this research and the uncanny connection we sought to unravel.

Turning to the small screen, we undertook the arduous task of "researching" television shows that might shed some light on our peculiar confluence of variables. From the intricate machinations of "Breaking Bad" to the technologically inclined adventures of "Black Mirror," we scoured the visual landscape for any inkling of insight into the whimsical dance between audio artisans in Illinois and the digital dalliances of Computerphile.

In a twist of fate, we also found ourselves enchanted by the fictional exploits chronicled in "Stranger Things." While the Upside Down world of Hawkins, Indiana bears little resemblance to the statistical mazes we traversed, we couldn't help but draw parallels between our own foray into uncharted territory and the supernatural occurrences that unfold in the series. After all, who's to say that statistical synchrony can't have an otherworldly charm?

With our literary expedition complete, we stand armed with a medley of scholarly insights, a sprinkle of fictional whimsy, and a touch of pop culture pizzazz. As we lay the groundwork for our own foray into the labyrinth of data analysis, we carry with us the wisdom of economists, physicists, and even intergalactic hitchhikers, all in pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic synergy between Illinois sound engineers and the allure of Computerphile likes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2013 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of research can often be a serious and somber place, with scholars delving into deep and complex topics with furrowed brows and furiously scribbling notes. However, in the spirit of audacious academic inquiry, we've dared to take a lighthearted leap into the unexplored territory that lies at the crossroads of sound engineering technicians in the Land of Lincoln and YouTube thumbs-up wonders. Who would have thought that these seemingly incongruous elements could be connected by a web of statistical sorcery?
As we embark on this whimsical journey through the annals of data, where decibels meet digital dexterity, we must acknowledge the sheer novelty and, some might argue, absurdity of our chosen variables. Illinois, famous for its deep-dish pizza and the windy city, does not immediately summon forth thoughts of sound engineering prowess, nor is it typically associated with the digital delights of Computerphile's YouTube channel. Yet, as the saying goes, "stranger things have happened," and we've dared to venture into this uncharted territory armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Now, before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our findings, it behooves us to acknowledge the raised eyebrows and quizzical looks that have greeted our unconventional choice of variables. Sound engineering technicians in Illinois are not exactly the talk of the town, and Computerphile, while a darling of the digital denizens, hardly seems to overlap with the world of labor statistics. However, as maverick researchers, we relish in defying conventions and blazing new trails, no matter how offbeat they may seem at first glance.
So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the tale of two seemingly disparate domains—where the soft hum of audio equipment meets the thunderous applause of digital clicks, and where correlations dance in the most unexpected of places. It's a tale of statistical synchrony and perhaps a dash of serendipity, all woven together with the thread of levity that we hope will infuse this academic endeavor with a touch of whimsy. After all, who said research can't be a bit of fun? So, buckle up and brace yourself for a wild ride through the peculiar world of Illinois sound engineers and YouTube likes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unpack the mysterious connection between the number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos, we set out on a spirited quest through the wilds of data analysis. Our approach was as eclectic as the subjects themselves, blending traditional quantitative methods with a sprinkle of imagination and a dash of statistical whimsy.

To begin our whimsical journey, we combed through the treasure troves of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to gather comprehensive data on the employment of sound engineering technicians in the illustrious state of Illinois. Armed with spreadsheets and an unwavering sense of curiosity, we meticulously tabulated the annual employment figures, pausing occasionally to marvel at the intriguing dance of digits and decimal points that seemed to whisper secrets yet untold.

Having secured our bounty of labor statistics, our intrepid band of researchers then turned our gaze to the digital emporium of YouTube, where Computerphile reigns supreme in delivering captivating content on all things computational. With a stroke of luck and a hint of digital dexterity, we harnessed the power of web scraping to harvest the average number of likes bestowed upon Computerphile's videos over the same period. This endeavor, though fraught with the perils of parsing through meta tags and wrestling with data APIs, yielded a treasure trove of quantitative appreciation in the form of thumbs-up clicks.

With an assortment of digits and figures at our disposal, we engaged in the enchanting ballet of statistical analysis. Embracing the charm of correlation coefficients and the allure of p-values, we unleashed our trusty software tools to wrangle the data into submission. Our hearts aflutter with anticipation, we marveled at the emergence of a correlation coefficient of 0.9440237, a result so robust that it seemed to don a cape and mask, ready to leap off the page and into the annals of statistical legend.

But our fervent affair with these numbers did not stop there. No, we turned the dial of statistical scrutiny to the significance level, where the p-value shone like a beacon of statistical significance, twinkling at us with a mischievous glint. To our bewilderment and delight, the p-value fell below the hallowed threshold of 0.01, sending ripples of statistical satisfaction through our merry band of researchers.

In the midst of our statistical revelry, we incorporated time series analysis to trace the fluctuations in the employment of sound engineering technicians and the ebbs and flows of Computerphile's like counts. The vibrant tapestry of time unfolded before us, revealing subtle patterns and synchronicities that hitherto lay concealed in the folds of temporal data.

Ultimately, our methodology dances to the beat of statistical rigor and serendipitous discovery, guided by a spirit of whimsy and a keen sense of wonder. With our toolbox brimming with data, statistical tests, and a sprinkling of digital magic, we set forth to unearth the hidden connections between the serenades of sound engineers and the applause of digital audiences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2013 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9440237, r-squared of 0.8911807, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of research can often be a serious and somber place, with scholars delving into deep and complex topics with furrowed brows and furiously scribbling notes. However, in the spirit of audacious academic inquiry, we've dared to take a lighthearted leap into the unexplored territory that lies at the crossroads of sound engineering technicians in the Land of Lincoln and YouTube thumbs-up wonders. Who would have thought that these seemingly incongruous elements could be connected by a web of statistical sorcery?
As we embark on this whimsical journey through the annals of data, where decibels meet digital dexterity, we must acknowledge the sheer novelty and, some might argue, absurdity of our chosen variables. Illinois, famous for its deep-dish pizza and the windy city, does not immediately summon forth thoughts of sound engineering prowess, nor is it typically associated with the digital delights of Computerphile's YouTube channel. Yet, as the saying goes, "stranger things have happened," and we've dared to venture into this uncharted territory armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Now, before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our findings, it behooves us to acknowledge the raised eyebrows and quizzical looks that have greeted our unconventional choice of variables. Sound engineering technicians in Illinois are not exactly the talk of the town, and Computerphile, while a darling of the digital denizens, hardly seems to overlap with the world of labor statistics. However, as maverick researchers, we relish in defying conventions and blazing new trails, no matter how offbeat they may seem at first glance.
So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the tale of two seemingly disparate domains—where the soft hum of audio equipment meets the thunderous applause of digital clicks, and where correlations dance in the most unexpected of places. It's a tale of statistical synchrony and perhaps a dash of serendipity, all woven together with the thread of levity that we hope will infuse this academic endeavor with a touch of whimsy. After all, who said research can't be a bit of fun? So, buckle up and brace yourself for a wild ride through the peculiar world of Illinois sound engineers and YouTube likes!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of sound engineering technicians employed in Illinois and the average number of likes garnered by Computerphile's YouTube videos from 2013 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 signifies a strikingly close relationship between the two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.8911807 further corroborates the robustness of this correlation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.

In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the tight bond between these seemingly incongruent factors, depicting a clear and unmistakable pattern of alignment. The points on the plot practically hold hands, showcasing a synchronous dance of data points as if in perfect harmony.

Our findings, while undoubtedly surprising, offer a whimsical tale of unlikely connections and statistical symphonies. The marriage of sound engineering technicians in the heart of Illinois and the digital enthusiasm for Computerphile's content presents a puzzling yet captivating narrative. While the root cause of this correlation remains shrouded in mystery, our study serves as a testament to the unpredictable nature of data and the sheer delight of unearthing unexpected associations.

In conclusion, our results suggest a peculiar resonance between the niche world of sound engineering technicians in the Prairie State and the far-reaching digital reach of Computerphile's YouTube appeal. This tantalizing correlation beckons for further exploration and perhaps a touch of humor in navigating the untrodden paths of statistical serendipity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The notion of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos may at first appear to be odd bedfellows, like the fusion of pineapple on pizza or the incongruent pairing of socks. However, as we delved into the world of scholarly inquiry, we encountered a delightful smorgasbord of literature that ranged from the solemn to the downright wacky.
In "Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications" by Allan D. Pierce, the authors illuminate the intricate art of sound engineering, delving into the physics of waves and vibrations that would make even the most stoic reader's heart skip a beat. Yet, it was amidst this scholarly reverberation that we stumbled upon a peculiar observation - the potential link between the meticulously calibrated soundscapes crafted by technicians and the digital symphonies that trigger the ubiquitous thumbs-up icon on YouTube.
Venturing further into the realm of labor statistics, the work of John W. Cornwall and his tome "Introduction to Labor Economics" beckoned us into the world of employment trends and workforce dynamics. Little did we anticipate that our pursuit of knowledge would lead us to the curious intersection between labor markets and the realm of cyberspace appreciation.
But let us not dwell solely in the serious annals of scholarly tomes. In the spirit of levity and unbounded exploration, we also stumbled upon the curious musings of Douglas Adams in his seminal work "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." As we allowed ourselves a brief interlude of literary indulgence, we couldn't help but draw parallels between the improbability drive propelling us through this research and the uncanny connection we sought to unravel.
Turning to the small screen, we undertook the arduous task of "researching" television shows that might shed some light on our peculiar confluence of variables. From the intricate machinations of "Breaking Bad" to the technologically inclined adventures of "Black Mirror," we scoured the visual landscape for any inkling of insight into the whimsical dance between audio artisans in Illinois and the digital dalliances of Computerphile.
In a twist of fate, we also found ourselves enchanted by the fictional exploits chronicled in "Stranger Things." While the Upside Down world of Hawkins, Indiana bears little resemblance to the statistical mazes we traversed, we couldn't help but draw parallels between our own foray into uncharted territory and the supernatural occurrences that unfold in the series. After all, who's to say that statistical synchrony can't have an otherworldly charm?
With our literary expedition complete, we stand armed with a medley of scholarly insights, a sprinkle of fictional whimsy, and a touch of pop culture pizzazz. As we lay the groundwork for our own foray into the labyrinth of data analysis, we carry with us the wisdom of economists, physicists, and even intergalactic hitchhikers, all in pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic synergy between Illinois sound engineers and the allure of Computerphile likes.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of sound engineering technicians employed in Illinois and the average number of likes garnered by Computerphile's YouTube videos from 2013 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 signifies a strikingly close relationship between the two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.8911807 further corroborates the robustness of this correlation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the tight bond between these seemingly incongruent factors, depicting a clear and unmistakable pattern of alignment. The points on the plot practically hold hands, showcasing a synchronous dance of data points as if in perfect harmony.
Our findings, while undoubtedly surprising, offer a whimsical tale of unlikely connections and statistical symphonies. The marriage of sound engineering technicians in the heart of Illinois and the digital enthusiasm for Computerphile's content presents a puzzling yet captivating narrative. While the root cause of this correlation remains shrouded in mystery, our study serves as a testament to the unpredictable nature of data and the sheer delight of unearthing unexpected associations.
In conclusion, our results suggest a peculiar resonance between the niche world of sound engineering technicians in the Prairie State and the far-reaching digital reach of Computerphile's YouTube appeal. This tantalizing correlation beckons for further exploration and perhaps a touch of humor in navigating the untrodden paths of statistical serendipity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a fascinating alliance between the artisans of sound engineering in Illinois and the digital affections bestowed upon Computerphile's YouTube videos. The statistically robust correlation we uncovered defies conventional wisdom, much like the peculiar pairing of peanut butter and jelly. Our findings echo the eclectic juxtapositions we encountered in our literature review, deftly intertwining the seriousness of labor economics with the whimsy of fictional musings.

As we reflect upon our results, one cannot help but draw parallels to the uncanny musings of Douglas Adams in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." Just as the improbability drive propelled Adams' characters through absurd and unforeseen sequences of events, so too did our study uncover an improbable alliance between the palpable labor force in Illinois and the virtual thumbs-up gestures on Computerphile's digital landscape. Much like the upside-down world of "Stranger Things," this correlation presents a beguiling enigma that captivates the imagination.

Our findings echo the resonance observed by Pierce in "Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications." The intricacies of sound engineering, with its play of waves and vibrations, seem poised to extend beyond the physical realm and into the digital expanse of YouTube appreciation. Similarly, the astute insights of Cornwall in "Introduction to Labor Economics" resonate with our discovery, showcasing the unexpected interplay between labor markets and the intangible realm of cyber popularity.

The scatterplot, akin to a synchronized waltz, visually encapsulates the harmonic bond we observed. The robust correlation coefficient and the rejection of the null hypothesis provide a resounding validation of this unlikely confluence. Our results not only substantiate but also amplify the whimsical spirit of inquiry that animated our exploration.

In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis, we have emerged not only with statistical certitude but also with a newfound appreciation for the mirthful serendipity that permeates our research. Our study lays bare an untold narrative of statistical whimsy and unlikely connections, inviting further investigation into the baffling synergy between the hearths of Illinois sound engineering and the digital hearts of Computerphile admirers. As we progress, we must heed the sage words of Adams, Cornwall, and even the fictitious escapades of "Stranger Things," for the improbable may indeed hold the key to unlocking the riddles of statistical synchrony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois and The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of research can often be a serious and somber place, with scholars delving into deep and complex topics with furrowed brows and furiously scribbling notes. However, in the spirit of audacious academic inquiry, we've dared to take a lighthearted leap into the unexplored territory that lies at the crossroads of sound engineering technicians in the Land of Lincoln and YouTube thumbs-up wonders. Who would have thought that these seemingly incongruous elements could be connected by a web of statistical sorcery?
As we embark on this whimsical journey through the annals of data, where decibels meet digital dexterity, we must acknowledge the sheer novelty and, some might argue, absurdity of our chosen variables. Illinois, famous for its deep-dish pizza and the windy city, does not immediately summon forth thoughts of sound engineering prowess, nor is it typically associated with the digital delights of Computerphile's YouTube channel. Yet, as the saying goes, "stranger things have happened," and we've dared to venture into this uncharted territory armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
Now, before we dive into the nitty-gritty of our findings, it behooves us to acknowledge the raised eyebrows and quizzical looks that have greeted our unconventional choice of variables. Sound engineering technicians in Illinois are not exactly the talk of the town, and Computerphile, while a darling of the digital denizens, hardly seems to overlap with the world of labor statistics. However, as maverick researchers, we relish in defying conventions and blazing new trails, no matter how offbeat they may seem at first glance.
So, dear reader, prepare to be regaled with the tale of two seemingly disparate domains—where the soft hum of audio equipment meets the thunderous applause of digital clicks, and where correlations dance in the most unexpected of places. It's a tale of statistical synchrony and perhaps a dash of serendipity, all woven together with the thread of levity that we hope will infuse this academic endeavor with a touch of whimsy. After all, who said research can't be a bit of fun? So, buckle up and brace yourself for a wild ride through the peculiar world of Illinois sound engineers and YouTube likes!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the number of sound engineering technicians employed in Illinois and the average number of likes garnered by Computerphile's YouTube videos from 2013 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 signifies a strikingly close relationship between the two variables, and the r-squared value of 0.8911807 further corroborates the robustness of this correlation. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently reject the null hypothesis and assert that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance.
In Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the tight bond between these seemingly incongruent factors, depicting a clear and unmistakable pattern of alignment. The points on the plot practically hold hands, showcasing a synchronous dance of data points as if in perfect harmony.
Our findings, while undoubtedly surprising, offer a whimsical tale of unlikely connections and statistical symphonies. The marriage of sound engineering technicians in the heart of Illinois and the digital enthusiasm for Computerphile's content presents a puzzling yet captivating narrative. While the root cause of this correlation remains shrouded in mystery, our study serves as a testament to the unpredictable nature of data and the sheer delight of unearthing unexpected associations.
In conclusion, our results suggest a peculiar resonance between the niche world of sound engineering technicians in the Prairie State and the far-reaching digital reach of Computerphile's YouTube appeal. This tantalizing correlation beckons for further exploration and perhaps a touch of humor in navigating the untrodden paths of statistical serendipity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the harmonious tale of Illinois sound engineers and Computerphile YouTube likes, we've uncovered a correlation so tight, it's like they're two peas in a pod – or, in the case of sound engineers, two knobs on a soundboard. Our findings defy the conventional wisdom that the only way for sound engineers to make waves is with their soundwaves. Who knew that their impact could extend to the digital realm of YouTube likes?

As we wrap up this merry dance of data, it's clear that these seemingly unrelated variables have struck a chord with each other, creating a statistical duet that would make even the most seasoned researchers do a double take. It's like finding out that the secret to viral YouTube videos lies not just in the content, but in the subtle symphony of sound engineering prowess coursing through the digital airwaves.

While we're left scratching our heads as to the underlying cause of this curious correlation, one thing is abundantly clear: the world of data analysis is a place of endless surprises and unheralded connections. As we bid adieu to this serendipitous journey through Illinois and the digital domain, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical paths that statistical exploration can lead us down.

So, dear reader, let this be a reminder that in the world of research, where numbers and hypotheses reign supreme, there's always room for a dash of the unexpected and a dollop of humor. And with that, we proudly assert that our findings stand as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of data. No further research is needed in this area - we've quite literally struck the perfect note.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Acoustic Engineering and Digital Delights


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Audio Engineering Excellence


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Illinois Sound Engineers and Computerphile Likes: A Rhyme to Measure Time? with an abstract of Our study sought to address the seemingly unrelated realms of sound engineering technician employment in Illinois and the average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube, we endeavored to uncover any potential correlation between the two peculiar variables. To our amusement, we discovered a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9440237 with a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period from 2013 to 2022. Our findings, though unexpected, suggest that the technicians wielding knobs and sliders in Illinois may indeed have a discernible impact on the digital appreciation of Computerphile's content. While causation remains elusive, the resounding synchrony between these seemingly disparate factors serves as a symphonic reminder to approach data analysis with an open mind and a keen sense of humor.

ChatGPT:

Illinois, sound engineering technician, employment, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Computerphile, YouTube, correlation, data analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, digital appreciation, YouTube likes, Illinois technicians, Computerphile content

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of sound engineering technicians in Illinois
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois

The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9440237 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8911807 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois) over the 10 years from 2013 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.01E-5. 0.0000401347063023336200000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00401% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24,916 random variables You don't actually need 24 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois (Laborers)430290280320380220240280340250
The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos (Average likes)10763.57034.925357.947557.918106.74507.24776.925561.156784.085844.37




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([430,290,280,320,380,220,240,280,340,250,])
array_2 = np.array([10763.5,7034.92,5357.94,7557.91,8106.7,4507.2,4776.92,5561.15,6784.08,5844.37,])
array_1_name = "The number of sound engineering technicians in Illinois"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on Computerphile YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 4765 · Black Variable ID: 7394 · Red Variable ID: 25909
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0