about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,771 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and the second variable is The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa.  The chart goes from 2014 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The more philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa, the greater the enlightenment on deep cosmic questions, leading to cooler SciShow Space video titles. It's a real scholastic-astro dynamic happening there!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Using the style [ Data cyber art ], generate an image depicting a serene courtyard amidst the rolling hills of Iowa. In this scene, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers gather, engaging in thoughtful discussions about the mysteries of the universe. The air is filled with a sense of enlightenment and cosmic curiosity as the number of educators grows. In the distance, a screen displays the latest SciShow Space video titles, each brimming with excitement and depth as the collective wisdom of the scholars inspires cooler and more profound explorations of the cosmos. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art A photo-realistic image A photo-realistic image Art nouveau Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa, in the following situation: The more philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa, the greater the enlightenment on deep cosmic questions, leading to cooler SciShow Space video titles. It's a real scholastic-astro dynamic happening there!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the rolling hills of Iowa, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers gather in a serene courtyard, engaging in thoughtful discussions about the mysteries of the universe. As the number of educators grows, the air becomes filled with a sense of enlightenment and cosmic curiosity. In the distance, a screen displays the latest SciShow Space video titles, each one brimming with excitement and depth as the collective wisdom of the scholars inspires ever cooler and more profound explorations of the cosmos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the rolling hills of Iowa, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers gather in a serene courtyard, engaging in thoughtful discussions about the mysteries of the universe. As the number of educators grows, the air becomes filled with a sense of enlightenment and cosmic curiosity. In the distance, a screen displays the latest SciShow Space video titles, each one brimming with excitement and depth as the collective wisdom of the scholars inspires ever cooler and more profound explorations of the cosmos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Using the style [ Data cyber art ], generate an image depicting a serene courtyard amidst the rolling hills of Iowa. In this scene, a group of university philosophy and religion teachers gather, engaging in thoughtful discussions about the mysteries of the universe. The air is filled with a sense of enlightenment and cosmic curiosity as the number of educators grows. In the distance, a screen displays the latest SciShow Space video titles, each brimming with excitement and depth as the collective wisdom of the scholars inspires cooler and more profound explorations of the cosmos.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are positively influenced The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities

The Interdisciplinary Journal of Cosmic Curiosity

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9267314 and p < 0.01 for 2014 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The allure of the cosmos has long captivated humanity, drawing us to ponder the mysteries of the universe and find our place within it. In recent times, the proliferation of online platforms has provided a gateway for the masses to delve into the realms of space exploration and discovery. One such platform, SciShow Space, has garnered attention for its engaging content and, perhaps unexpectedly, its intriguing video titles. With a twinkle in our eye and curiosity as vast as the universe, we aim to explore the seemingly ethereal connection between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic milieu of philosophy and religion teaching in the state of Iowa.

As the digital age unfolds, the influence of online media on societal trends and professional landscapes is becoming increasingly apparent. This study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. While this unusual pairing of variables may raise some eyebrows, our pursuit of knowledge knows no bounds. We embrace the challenge of peering beyond the conventional confines of research, even if it means venturing into uncharted territories of statistical analysis.

The celestial correlation under examination herein is as enigmatic as the dark matter that pervades the universe. By harnessing data from AI sentiment analysis of the captivating YouTube video titles proffered by SciShow Space and integrating it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' repository of scholarly employment records, we endeavor to unlock the secrets that lie at the infinitesimal intersection of science communication and academic disciplines. It is our hope that this endeavor will bring forth a supernova of insights, shedding light on the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.

As we embark on this astral journey of statistical exploration, we eagerly anticipate unveiling the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. The findings of this study promise to challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape. In doing so, we aspire to ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe that transcends disciplines and inspires further scholarly endeavors in the boundless expanse of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The allure of the cosmos has long captivated humanity, drawing us to ponder the mysteries of the universe and find our place within it. In recent times, the proliferation of online platforms has provided a gateway for the masses to delve into the realms of space exploration and discovery. One such platform, SciShow Space, has garnered attention for its engaging content and, perhaps unexpectedly, its intriguing video titles. With a twinkle in our eye and curiosity as vast as the universe, we aim to explore the seemingly ethereal connection between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic milieu of philosophy and religion teaching in the state of Iowa.
As the digital age unfolds, the influence of online media on societal trends and professional landscapes is becoming increasingly apparent. This study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. While this unusual pairing of variables may raise some eyebrows, our pursuit of knowledge knows no bounds. We embrace the challenge of peering beyond the conventional confines of research, even if it means venturing into uncharted territories of statistical analysis.
The celestial correlation under examination herein is as enigmatic as the dark matter that pervades the universe. By harnessing data from AI sentiment analysis of the captivating YouTube video titles proffered by SciShow Space and integrating it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' repository of scholarly employment records, we endeavor to unlock the secrets that lie at the infinitesimal intersection of science communication and academic disciplines. It is our hope that this endeavor will bring forth a supernova of insights, shedding light on the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
As we embark on this astral journey of statistical exploration, we eagerly anticipate unveiling the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. The findings of this study promise to challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape. In doing so, we aspire to ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe that transcends disciplines and inspires further scholarly endeavors in the boundless expanse of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior research on the interplay of online media and academic disciplines is scarce, prompting the authors to cast a wide net in their search for relevant literature. Early inquiries into this subject led the authors to the work of Smith et al. (2010) who examined the impact of science communication on public engagement with academic subjects. While the study did not explicitly focus on the coolness factor of YouTube video titles, it hinted at the potential influence of digital media on the public perception of scholarly pursuits.

In a similarly earnest pursuit of insights, Doe (2015) delved into the nuances of interdisciplinary influences in academia. Although their work primarily centered on the intersection of psychology and economics, the authors found inspiration in Doe's thorough exploration of unexpected connections within the scholarly landscape.

Jones (2018) contributed to the discourse by examining the correlation between quirky social media content and public interest in historical literature. While the focus was divergent from the current investigation, the authors discerned parallels between Jones's findings and the potential implications for the integration of digital media in academic domains.

Turning to the realm of literature, "Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context" by Sagan (2006) and "Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love" by Sobel (1999) presented a broader perspective on the interaction between celestial phenomena and the human intellect. Although not directly related to the present study, these literary works subtly encouraged the authors to contemplate the cosmic undercurrents that may influence intellectual pursuits.

Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979) and "Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch" by Gaiman and Pratchett (1990) weaved narratives that touched upon cosmic wonders and philosophical musings, capturing the authors' imagination and inspiring a lighthearted approach to the investigation.

In a foray into the digital realm, recent social media posts observed by the authors hinted at a potential rapport between captivating space-related content and academic zeal, albeit in an anecdotal context. An intriguing tweet by @AstroEnthusiast pondered, "Do SciShow Space titles hold the key to unlocking the universe of knowledge in Iowa's academia? #thoughtsfromouterspace."

Similarly, a Reddit thread titled "Space Videos and Scholarly Pursuits: A Match Made in the Cosmos?" garnered attention and diverse opinions from online denizens, signifying the unexplored intrigue surrounding the interstellar connection under scrutiny.

These nuanced glimpses into the astral underpinnings of scholarly pursuits hinted at a cosmic dance of influence, sparking the authors' determination to delve deeper into the intertwined realms of space-themed media and philosophical and religious academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2014 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The allure of the cosmos has long captivated humanity, drawing us to ponder the mysteries of the universe and find our place within it. In recent times, the proliferation of online platforms has provided a gateway for the masses to delve into the realms of space exploration and discovery. One such platform, SciShow Space, has garnered attention for its engaging content and, perhaps unexpectedly, its intriguing video titles. With a twinkle in our eye and curiosity as vast as the universe, we aim to explore the seemingly ethereal connection between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic milieu of philosophy and religion teaching in the state of Iowa.
As the digital age unfolds, the influence of online media on societal trends and professional landscapes is becoming increasingly apparent. This study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. While this unusual pairing of variables may raise some eyebrows, our pursuit of knowledge knows no bounds. We embrace the challenge of peering beyond the conventional confines of research, even if it means venturing into uncharted territories of statistical analysis.
The celestial correlation under examination herein is as enigmatic as the dark matter that pervades the universe. By harnessing data from AI sentiment analysis of the captivating YouTube video titles proffered by SciShow Space and integrating it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' repository of scholarly employment records, we endeavor to unlock the secrets that lie at the infinitesimal intersection of science communication and academic disciplines. It is our hope that this endeavor will bring forth a supernova of insights, shedding light on the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
As we embark on this astral journey of statistical exploration, we eagerly anticipate unveiling the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. The findings of this study promise to challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape. In doing so, we aspire to ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe that transcends disciplines and inspires further scholarly endeavors in the boundless expanse of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to investigate the celestial connection between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities, a rigorous and multi-faceted methodology was employed. The research team cast its net far and wide, utilizing a blend of innovative approaches and established data sources to capture the elusive essence of this intergalactic correlation.

Firstly, data on the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles was obtained through the employment of AI sentiment analysis, which harnessed the power of machine learning and natural language processing to gauge the cosmic appeal exuded by these titillating titles. This process involved feeding the AI algorithm a stellar diet of SciShow Space video titles, allowing it to discern the subtle nuances of interstellar allure encapsulated within these linguistic constructs.

Simultaneously, the research team delved into the veritable cosmos of statistical data maintained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Here, information pertaining to the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities was carefully gleaned, meticulously sifting through the astral debris of employment records to unearth the gravitational pull exerted by these scholarly disciplines in the state of Iowa.

The temporal scope of this study spanned from 2014 to 2022, encapsulating an expansive cosmic canvas upon which the interplay of variables could be scrutinized. By drawing data from this extended timeframe, the study aimed to capture the astronomical fluctuations in both the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the professional presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa.

Once all relevant data had been procured, diligent statistical analyses were conducted to identify the cosmic dance of correlation between the two variables. Utilizing the findings from the AI sentiment analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, sophisticated statistical models were employed to unveil the intricacies of this celestial alliance, all while keeping a keen eye on the cosmic comedy of errors that often characterizes statistical inference.

Care was taken to mitigate the potential influence of confounding cosmic variables by incorporating robust control measures and wielding statistical techniques with the precision of a cosmic ray striking its target. The interstellar dimensions of this study necessitated the adoption of methodological tools capable of navigating the celestial expanse of data, ushering us through the cosmic ballet of statistical analysis and inference.

In conclusion, the multifaceted methodology undertaken for this study encapsulated a cosmic odyssey, charting a course through the astral depths of AI sentiment analysis, labor statistics, and statistical inference. This approach enabled the research team to embark on an empirical voyage, casting light into the cosmic confluence of SciShow Space video titles and the scholarly landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Throughout this odyssey, the team remained attuned to the subtle cosmic humor that often permeates statistical inquiry, reminding us that even in the most ethereal of realms, statistical research can hold a cosmic surprise or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of YouTube video titles and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2014 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9267314, r-squared of 0.8588311, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The allure of the cosmos has long captivated humanity, drawing us to ponder the mysteries of the universe and find our place within it. In recent times, the proliferation of online platforms has provided a gateway for the masses to delve into the realms of space exploration and discovery. One such platform, SciShow Space, has garnered attention for its engaging content and, perhaps unexpectedly, its intriguing video titles. With a twinkle in our eye and curiosity as vast as the universe, we aim to explore the seemingly ethereal connection between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic milieu of philosophy and religion teaching in the state of Iowa.
As the digital age unfolds, the influence of online media on societal trends and professional landscapes is becoming increasingly apparent. This study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. While this unusual pairing of variables may raise some eyebrows, our pursuit of knowledge knows no bounds. We embrace the challenge of peering beyond the conventional confines of research, even if it means venturing into uncharted territories of statistical analysis.
The celestial correlation under examination herein is as enigmatic as the dark matter that pervades the universe. By harnessing data from AI sentiment analysis of the captivating YouTube video titles proffered by SciShow Space and integrating it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' repository of scholarly employment records, we endeavor to unlock the secrets that lie at the infinitesimal intersection of science communication and academic disciplines. It is our hope that this endeavor will bring forth a supernova of insights, shedding light on the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
As we embark on this astral journey of statistical exploration, we eagerly anticipate unveiling the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. The findings of this study promise to challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape. In doing so, we aspire to ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe that transcends disciplines and inspires further scholarly endeavors in the boundless expanse of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The force was indeed strong with this one. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314 between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. The r-squared value of 0.8588311 further solidified the robustness of this celestial relationship, indicating that approximately 85.88% of the variation in the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities could be explained by the whimsical allure of SciShow Space video titles. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the existence of a significant connection between these seemingly disparate domains.

The findings of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, where a scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. This celestial dance of data points eloquently illustrates the cosmic forces at play, as if the stars themselves conspired to forge this unlikely alliance between science communication and scholarly pursuits in the heartland of Iowa.

In unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic landscape of philosophy and religion teaching, our study has ventured into uncharted territories of statistical exploration. The findings not only challenge traditional paradigms but also beckon us to contemplate the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape, spanning the boundless expanse of academia and the far reaches of the universe. These results ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe, transcending disciplines and inspiring further scholarly endeavors amidst the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.

The statistical significance of this celestial correlation serves as a beacon, guiding us toward a deeper understanding of the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. In the ethos of statistical exploration, it seems that the stars have aligned to illuminate a pathway for future research, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to embark on their own cosmic journey of inquiry and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research on the interplay of online media and academic disciplines is scarce, prompting the authors to cast a wide net in their search for relevant literature. Early inquiries into this subject led the authors to the work of Smith et al. (2010) who examined the impact of science communication on public engagement with academic subjects. While the study did not explicitly focus on the coolness factor of YouTube video titles, it hinted at the potential influence of digital media on the public perception of scholarly pursuits.
In a similarly earnest pursuit of insights, Doe (2015) delved into the nuances of interdisciplinary influences in academia. Although their work primarily centered on the intersection of psychology and economics, the authors found inspiration in Doe's thorough exploration of unexpected connections within the scholarly landscape.
Jones (2018) contributed to the discourse by examining the correlation between quirky social media content and public interest in historical literature. While the focus was divergent from the current investigation, the authors discerned parallels between Jones's findings and the potential implications for the integration of digital media in academic domains.
Turning to the realm of literature, "Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context" by Sagan (2006) and "Galileo's Daughter: A Historical Memoir of Science, Faith, and Love" by Sobel (1999) presented a broader perspective on the interaction between celestial phenomena and the human intellect. Although not directly related to the present study, these literary works subtly encouraged the authors to contemplate the cosmic undercurrents that may influence intellectual pursuits.
Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979) and "Good Omens: The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch" by Gaiman and Pratchett (1990) weaved narratives that touched upon cosmic wonders and philosophical musings, capturing the authors' imagination and inspiring a lighthearted approach to the investigation.
In a foray into the digital realm, recent social media posts observed by the authors hinted at a potential rapport between captivating space-related content and academic zeal, albeit in an anecdotal context. An intriguing tweet by @AstroEnthusiast pondered, "Do SciShow Space titles hold the key to unlocking the universe of knowledge in Iowa's academia? #thoughtsfromouterspace."
Similarly, a Reddit thread titled "Space Videos and Scholarly Pursuits: A Match Made in the Cosmos?" garnered attention and diverse opinions from online denizens, signifying the unexplored intrigue surrounding the interstellar connection under scrutiny.
These nuanced glimpses into the astral underpinnings of scholarly pursuits hinted at a cosmic dance of influence, sparking the authors' determination to delve deeper into the intertwined realms of space-themed media and philosophical and religious academia.

[[RESULTS]]
The force was indeed strong with this one. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314 between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. The r-squared value of 0.8588311 further solidified the robustness of this celestial relationship, indicating that approximately 85.88% of the variation in the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities could be explained by the whimsical allure of SciShow Space video titles. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the existence of a significant connection between these seemingly disparate domains.
The findings of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, where a scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. This celestial dance of data points eloquently illustrates the cosmic forces at play, as if the stars themselves conspired to forge this unlikely alliance between science communication and scholarly pursuits in the heartland of Iowa.
In unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic landscape of philosophy and religion teaching, our study has ventured into uncharted territories of statistical exploration. The findings not only challenge traditional paradigms but also beckon us to contemplate the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape, spanning the boundless expanse of academia and the far reaches of the universe. These results ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe, transcending disciplines and inspiring further scholarly endeavors amidst the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
The statistical significance of this celestial correlation serves as a beacon, guiding us toward a deeper understanding of the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. In the ethos of statistical exploration, it seems that the stars have aligned to illuminate a pathway for future research, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to embark on their own cosmic journey of inquiry and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has unearthed a celestial correlation that extends far beyond the reaches of mere chance. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9267314 between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities provides compelling support for the hypothesis that there exists an otherworldly connection between online science communication and the scholarly domains of philosophy and religion. The robust r-squared value of 0.8588311 further reinforces the solidity of this cosmic relationship, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the variance in the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities can be attributed to the ineffable allure of SciShow Space video titles.

Building upon previous research that hinted at the potential influence of digital media on public perception of scholarly pursuits, our findings not only substantiate, but also elevate this notion to cosmic proportions. Upon reflecting on the nuanced sources cited in the literature review, it becomes evident that our study has skilfully navigated the astronomical landscape that exists at the intersection of online media, public engagement, and academic disciplines. The Twitter musings and Reddit ponderings, although anecdotal in nature, now seem less like fleeting comments and more like celestial whispers from the cosmic ether, gently nudging us towards the revelation of this unexpected, yet formidable correlation.

Figure 1 beautifully encapsulates this enigmatic relationship, painting a vivid portrait of the celestial dance of data points that mirrors the cosmic forces at play. It is as if the very stars themselves have aligned to foster this seemingly improbable alliance between the captivating titles of science videos and the scholarly pursuits that have long sought to plumb the depths of human understanding. Our results not only challenge traditional paradigms but also beckon us to consider the cosmic undercurrents that may, in fact, shape the intellectual landscape itself.

The statistical significance of this celestial correlation is undeniable, and it has illuminated a pathway for future research to probe deeper into the cosmic constants that bind together the whimsical realm of YouTube titles and the hallowed halls of academia. These findings stir cosmic curiosity and awe, transcending disciplinary boundaries and inspiring further scholarly endeavors amidst the intergalactic allure that appears to extend its influence into the philosophical and religious academia of Iowa. As we gaze into the starry sky of statistical exploration, it is undeniable that the stars have aligned to provide a guiding light for future inquiry—a cosmic call to embark on a journey of discovery that traverses the thriving expanse of inquiry and the far reaches of the universe.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are and The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The allure of the cosmos has long captivated humanity, drawing us to ponder the mysteries of the universe and find our place within it. In recent times, the proliferation of online platforms has provided a gateway for the masses to delve into the realms of space exploration and discovery. One such platform, SciShow Space, has garnered attention for its engaging content and, perhaps unexpectedly, its intriguing video titles. With a twinkle in our eye and curiosity as vast as the universe, we aim to explore the seemingly ethereal connection between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic milieu of philosophy and religion teaching in the state of Iowa.
As the digital age unfolds, the influence of online media on societal trends and professional landscapes is becoming increasingly apparent. This study endeavors to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. While this unusual pairing of variables may raise some eyebrows, our pursuit of knowledge knows no bounds. We embrace the challenge of peering beyond the conventional confines of research, even if it means venturing into uncharted territories of statistical analysis.
The celestial correlation under examination herein is as enigmatic as the dark matter that pervades the universe. By harnessing data from AI sentiment analysis of the captivating YouTube video titles proffered by SciShow Space and integrating it with the Bureau of Labor Statistics' repository of scholarly employment records, we endeavor to unlock the secrets that lie at the infinitesimal intersection of science communication and academic disciplines. It is our hope that this endeavor will bring forth a supernova of insights, shedding light on the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
As we embark on this astral journey of statistical exploration, we eagerly anticipate unveiling the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. The findings of this study promise to challenge conventional paradigms and beckon researchers and enthusiasts alike to ponder the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape. In doing so, we aspire to ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe that transcends disciplines and inspires further scholarly endeavors in the boundless expanse of academia.

[[RESULTS]]
The force was indeed strong with this one. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314 between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. The r-squared value of 0.8588311 further solidified the robustness of this celestial relationship, indicating that approximately 85.88% of the variation in the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities could be explained by the whimsical allure of SciShow Space video titles. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and support the existence of a significant connection between these seemingly disparate domains.
The findings of our analysis are succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, where a scatterplot vividly portrays the strong positive correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities. This celestial dance of data points eloquently illustrates the cosmic forces at play, as if the stars themselves conspired to forge this unlikely alliance between science communication and scholarly pursuits in the heartland of Iowa.
In unraveling the enigmatic relationship between the captivating allure of SciShow Space video titles and the academic landscape of philosophy and religion teaching, our study has ventured into uncharted territories of statistical exploration. The findings not only challenge traditional paradigms but also beckon us to contemplate the cosmic forces that shape the intellectual landscape, spanning the boundless expanse of academia and the far reaches of the universe. These results ignite a sense of cosmic curiosity and awe, transcending disciplines and inspiring further scholarly endeavors amidst the intergalactic allure that may extend its influence into the hallowed halls of Iowa's philosophical and religious academia.
The statistical significance of this celestial correlation serves as a beacon, guiding us toward a deeper understanding of the cosmic constants that tie together the whimsical world of YouTube titles and the sober world of academic pursuits. In the ethos of statistical exploration, it seems that the stars have aligned to illuminate a pathway for future research, inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to embark on their own cosmic journey of inquiry and discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In summation, our investigation into the cosmic connection between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the presence of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities has unveiled a celestial dance of data points that can only be described as out of this world. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, complemented by an r-squared value of 0.8588311, unequivocally demonstrates a cosmic influence that reaches across the statistical stratosphere. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides reassurance that this alliance is more than a statistical fluke - unless, of course, we're dealing with the statistically significant effects of a cosmic quirk.

As we reflect on these findings, it becomes clear that the allure of the cosmos extends far beyond the confines of astrophysical domains, permeating the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Perhaps the cosmic dance captured in our scatterplot is a metaphor for the interstellar dance of disciplines, each exerting gravitational influence on the other in a celestial waltz of statistical significance. It seems that the cosmic forces have conspired to forge an alliance that, much like the expanding universe, continues to defy traditional boundaries and spark cosmic curiosity in the academic realm.

In light of these findings, it is evident that the cosmic allure of SciShow Space video titles transcends disciplines and challenges us to look beyond the ordinary realms of statistical exploration. However, despite the tantalizing appeal of further research, it appears that the cosmic curtain has been drawn on this particular investigation. The cosmic connection between the coolness factor of SciShow Space video titles and the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa universities has been illuminated, leaving little room for further statistical stargazing. It seems that, in this celestial symphony of statistical significance, the stars have aligned to signal that no further research is needed in this cosmic frontier.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Interdisciplinary Journal of Cosmic Curiosity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Cosmic Inquiry Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Starry Eyed: Exploring the Celestial Connection Between SciShow Space Video Titles and the Presence of Philosophy and Religion Teachers in Iowa Universities with an abstract of This study investigates the potential celestial correlation between the coolness factor of SciShow Space YouTube video titles and the professional landscape of philosophy and religion teaching in Iowa universities. Leveraging data from AI sentiment analysis of YouTube video titles and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to unravel the cosmic influence on academic disciplines. Our analysis uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9267314, with a p-value of less than 0.01, for the period spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our findings suggest that there may be more than meets the eye in the intergalactic appeal of SciShow Space, reaching as far as the scholarly endeavors of Iowa's philosophical and religious minds. Consequently, this study sheds light on this unlikely alliance, challenging traditional paradigms and inspiring further exploration into the interdisciplinary influences that shape academia.

ChatGPT:

SciShow Space, YouTube video titles, philosophy, religion, teachers, Iowa universities, celestial correlation, AI sentiment analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, academic disciplines, cosmic influence, correlation coefficient, p-value, interdisciplinary influences, celestial connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are
Detailed data title: How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are, as rated by an AI.
Source: AI analysis of YouTube video titles
Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.

See what else correlates with How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are

The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of philosophy and religion teachers, postsecondary in Iowa
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.9267314 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8588311 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are) over the 9 years from 2014 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00033. 0.0003261373942103942500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.033% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,066 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.68, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201420152016201720182019202020212022
How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are (Coolness score (out of 10))7.27637.1257.60957.51927.4667.38837.38247.15317.1828
The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa (Laborers)270260350350360320300240280




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.2763,7.125,7.6095,7.5192,7.466,7.3883,7.3824,7.1531,7.1828,])
array_2 = np.array([270,260,350,350,360,320,300,240,280,])
array_1_name = "How cool SciShow Space YouTube video titles are"
array_2_name = "The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 4771 · Black Variable ID: 25665 · Red Variable ID: 7923
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0