about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,882 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Renewable energy production in Belgium and the second variable is Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Belgium started harnessing more renewable energy, the electrons in the air became charged with eco-friendly vibes. These supercharged particles inadvertently enhanced the magnetism of LockPickingLawyer's video content, attracting a shocking surge of likes from viewers. It's a true power play of positivity – sparking an electrifying connection between renewable energy production and the virtual approval of lock-picking escapades.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Description] Create an image of a picturesque Belgian countryside with wind turbines and solar panels generating renewable energy. The charged particles in the air should be depicted as shimmering colorful swirls. In the background, show a digital screen displaying LockPickingLawyer's YouTube video receiving a surge of likes. Illustrate an electrifying connection between the renewable energy production and the virtual approval of the lock-picking content. The scene should exude a sense of charged atmosphere and technological synergy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Surrealism Realistic Brutalism Glitch art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, in the following situation: As Belgium started harnessing more renewable energy, the electrons in the air became charged with eco-friendly vibes. These supercharged particles inadvertently enhanced the magnetism of LockPickingLawyer's video content, attracting a shocking surge of likes from viewers. It's a true power play of positivity – sparking an electrifying connection between renewable energy production and the virtual approval of lock-picking escapades.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Belgium, wind turbines and solar panels line the countryside, generating renewable energy as charged particles swirl in the air. Meanwhile, on the digital front, LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos are gaining an impressive number of likes, with a surge in virtual approval for his lock-picking skills. The charged atmosphere has inadvertently enhanced the magnetism of his content, sparking an electrifying connection between renewable energy production and the virtual approval of lock-picking escapades.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Belgium, wind turbines and solar panels line the countryside, generating renewable energy as charged particles swirl in the air. Meanwhile, on the digital front, LockPickingLawyer's YouTube videos are gaining an impressive number of likes, with a surge in virtual approval for his lock-picking skills. The charged atmosphere has inadvertently enhanced the magnetism of his content, sparking an electrifying connection between renewable energy production and the virtual approval of lock-picking escapades. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Description] Create an image of a picturesque Belgian countryside with wind turbines and solar panels generating renewable energy. The charged particles in the air should be depicted as shimmering colorful swirls. In the background, show a digital screen displaying LockPickingLawyer's YouTube video receiving a surge of likes. Illustrate an electrifying connection between the renewable energy production and the virtual approval of the lock-picking content. The scene should exude a sense of charged atmosphere and technological synergy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Renewable energy production in Belgium caused Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

Journal of Renewable Energy and Security Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of renewable energy has long been an illuminating subject within scientific discourse, shedding light on the sustainable future of our planet. Conversely, the fascination with lock picking has often been regarded as an obscure, albeit intriguing, pastime that has captured the attention of a surprisingly large audience. These two seemingly unrelated phenomena have been subjects of individual studies and analyses; however, the potential relationship between renewable energy production and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has largely remained in the dark.

In recent years, Belgium has emerged as a beacon of renewable energy production, drawing attention not only to its efforts in reducing carbon emissions but also to its notable strides in wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer, with his deft hands and unparalleled finesse, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube, mesmerizing viewers with the art and precision of lock picking while simultaneously providing an unexpected education on the vulnerabilities of security systems.

Intrigued by the juxtaposition of these two seemingly incongruous trends, our research team set out to untangle the web of interconnectedness that may exist between the production of renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes garnered by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. With a twinkle of curiosity and a surge of statistical rigor, we ventured into uncharted territory, seeking to shed light on this unusual association.

As we delved into the depths of data acquisition and analysis, the prevailing question emerged: could there be an illuminating connection between the generation of sustainable energy and the magnetic allure of lock-picking finesse? The initial skepticism towards such a correlation was swiftly overshadowed by the gleam of intriguing possibilities, prompting a rigorous exploration of the entwined paths of renewable energy and lock-picking enthusiasm.

In this paper, we present the results of our exhaustive investigation, which introduces a novel perspective on the unforeseen interplay between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking. Our findings not only illuminate potential linkages between these divergent realms but also underscore the intricacies of societal engagement and the captivating nature of public interest. As we embark on this illuminating journey, we invite the reader to join us in uncovering the unexpected, whether it be the capture of sunlight or the unlocking of secrets, for in the world of research, there is always a glimmer of discovery waiting to be revealed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of renewable energy has long been an illuminating subject within scientific discourse, shedding light on the sustainable future of our planet. Conversely, the fascination with lock picking has often been regarded as an obscure, albeit intriguing, pastime that has captured the attention of a surprisingly large audience. These two seemingly unrelated phenomena have been subjects of individual studies and analyses; however, the potential relationship between renewable energy production and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has largely remained in the dark.
In recent years, Belgium has emerged as a beacon of renewable energy production, drawing attention not only to its efforts in reducing carbon emissions but also to its notable strides in wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer, with his deft hands and unparalleled finesse, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube, mesmerizing viewers with the art and precision of lock picking while simultaneously providing an unexpected education on the vulnerabilities of security systems.
Intrigued by the juxtaposition of these two seemingly incongruous trends, our research team set out to untangle the web of interconnectedness that may exist between the production of renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes garnered by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. With a twinkle of curiosity and a surge of statistical rigor, we ventured into uncharted territory, seeking to shed light on this unusual association.
As we delved into the depths of data acquisition and analysis, the prevailing question emerged: could there be an illuminating connection between the generation of sustainable energy and the magnetic allure of lock-picking finesse? The initial skepticism towards such a correlation was swiftly overshadowed by the gleam of intriguing possibilities, prompting a rigorous exploration of the entwined paths of renewable energy and lock-picking enthusiasm.
In this paper, we present the results of our exhaustive investigation, which introduces a novel perspective on the unforeseen interplay between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking. Our findings not only illuminate potential linkages between these divergent realms but also underscore the intricacies of societal engagement and the captivating nature of public interest. As we embark on this illuminating journey, we invite the reader to join us in uncovering the unexpected, whether it be the capture of sunlight or the unlocking of secrets, for in the world of research, there is always a glimmer of discovery waiting to be revealed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the curious correlation between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos stands at the intersection of unconventional inquiries and uncharted scholarly landscapes. Previous literature has sought to shed light on the intricacies of renewable energy trends, with authors Smith and Doe (2018) elucidating the multifaceted dynamics of energy transition and the societal impacts of sustainable initiatives. Similarly, Jones (2019) delved into the complexities of public engagement with renewable energy, illuminating the patterns of societal interest and enthusiasm for environmentally conscious practices.

The world of lock picking, though seemingly esoteric, has also garnered scholarly attention, with works such as "The Art of Lockpicking" by Lockhart (2017) offering keen insights into the historical, technical, and cultural dimensions of this enigmatic craft. Furthermore, "Criminal Lock Picking: A Handbook on How to Pick Different Types of Locks" by Turnquist (2020) delves into the practical applications of lock picking, intertwining theoretical knowledge with real-world scenarios.

Turning to the more imaginative realm of fiction, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code," and its exploration of cryptic codes and enigmatic mechanisms draw tangential parallels to the intricacies of lock picking and the allure of uncovering hidden truths. Similarly, the escapades of Sherlock Holmes, as penned by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, evoke a sense of intrigue and problem-solving prowess that resonates with the art of navigating security systems.

As we traverse through the landscape of unconventional literature and scholarly pursuits, it becomes evident that unorthodox connections can often yield unexpected insights, much like how a random assortment of items on a CVS receipt might hold the key to decoding complex societal trends. In this context, our literature review extends beyond the traditional confines of scholarly works, embracing the unanticipated and embracing the unexpected as we illuminate the unexplored connections between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of renewable energy has long been an illuminating subject within scientific discourse, shedding light on the sustainable future of our planet. Conversely, the fascination with lock picking has often been regarded as an obscure, albeit intriguing, pastime that has captured the attention of a surprisingly large audience. These two seemingly unrelated phenomena have been subjects of individual studies and analyses; however, the potential relationship between renewable energy production and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has largely remained in the dark.
In recent years, Belgium has emerged as a beacon of renewable energy production, drawing attention not only to its efforts in reducing carbon emissions but also to its notable strides in wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer, with his deft hands and unparalleled finesse, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube, mesmerizing viewers with the art and precision of lock picking while simultaneously providing an unexpected education on the vulnerabilities of security systems.
Intrigued by the juxtaposition of these two seemingly incongruous trends, our research team set out to untangle the web of interconnectedness that may exist between the production of renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes garnered by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. With a twinkle of curiosity and a surge of statistical rigor, we ventured into uncharted territory, seeking to shed light on this unusual association.
As we delved into the depths of data acquisition and analysis, the prevailing question emerged: could there be an illuminating connection between the generation of sustainable energy and the magnetic allure of lock-picking finesse? The initial skepticism towards such a correlation was swiftly overshadowed by the gleam of intriguing possibilities, prompting a rigorous exploration of the entwined paths of renewable energy and lock-picking enthusiasm.
In this paper, we present the results of our exhaustive investigation, which introduces a novel perspective on the unforeseen interplay between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking. Our findings not only illuminate potential linkages between these divergent realms but also underscore the intricacies of societal engagement and the captivating nature of public interest. As we embark on this illuminating journey, we invite the reader to join us in uncovering the unexpected, whether it be the capture of sunlight or the unlocking of secrets, for in the world of research, there is always a glimmer of discovery waiting to be revealed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential connection between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, our research team embarked on a quest for data spanning from 2015 to 2021. With the fervor of a detective seeking to crack a case, we scoured the digital landscape, employing a myriad of tools and resources to uncover the elusive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Data Collection:
Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted territories, we traversed the virtual realms of the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and YouTube, utilizing their extensive databases to procure the necessary datasets for our analysis. We meticulously combed through the EIA's treasure trove of renewable energy statistics, delving into the depths of Belgium's wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy production. Simultaneously, we delved into the YouTube API, casting our nets wide to capture the total likes garnered by the captivating escapades of the LockPickingLawyer. Every byte of data was carefully cataloged, akin to a scholarly hoarder saving gems for future analysis.

Data Processing:
With the fervor of an alchemist transmuting base metals into gold, our team set about processing the raw data, employing statistical sorcery to transform unwieldy figures into meaningful insights. Through the incantations of Python and R, we meticulously cleaned and organized the datasets, ensuring that no gremlins or goblins of data irregularities plagued our analyses. Each variable underwent rigorous scrutiny, akin to a discerning sommelier appraising the qualities of fine wine.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a battery of statistical tools and an arsenal of analytical acumen, we set forth to unravel the potential association between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer videos. A symphony of regression models, correlation tests, and time series analyses were orchestrated, each note resonating with the desire to unearth any hidden melodies in the data. The melodies were sweet, as our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01), garnering a nod of approval from the statistical muses.

Cross-Validation and Sensitivity Analysis:
In the pursuit of scientific rigor, we subjected our findings to the crucible of cross-validation and sensitivity analysis. Like a wine connoisseur savoring the complexities of a fine vintage, we scrutinized our results to ensure their robustness and reliability. Sensitivity analyses were conducted, with various permutations and combinations of model specifications, akin to a rigorous stress test for statistical stamina.

Limitations and Assumptions:
While our methodology exuded the charm of scientific sorcery, it was not immune to limitations and assumptions. The assumptions underlying our statistical models were akin to the hidden ingredients of a culinary masterpiece, adding flavor and depth to our analyses. Furthermore, the limitations of our study were akin to the occasional gusts of wind disrupting a serene picnic, reminding us of the imperfections inherent in any scientific endeavor.

In summary, our methodology harnessed the spirit of scholarly inquisitiveness and the rigor of statistical craftsmanship to investigate the uncharted territory of the relationship between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. As we journeyed through the twists and turns of data collection, processing, and analysis, our fervent pursuit of knowledge shone brightly, much like a renewable energy source illuminating the pathway to discovery.

```


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9939426, r-squared of 0.9879219, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of renewable energy has long been an illuminating subject within scientific discourse, shedding light on the sustainable future of our planet. Conversely, the fascination with lock picking has often been regarded as an obscure, albeit intriguing, pastime that has captured the attention of a surprisingly large audience. These two seemingly unrelated phenomena have been subjects of individual studies and analyses; however, the potential relationship between renewable energy production and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has largely remained in the dark.
In recent years, Belgium has emerged as a beacon of renewable energy production, drawing attention not only to its efforts in reducing carbon emissions but also to its notable strides in wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer, with his deft hands and unparalleled finesse, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube, mesmerizing viewers with the art and precision of lock picking while simultaneously providing an unexpected education on the vulnerabilities of security systems.
Intrigued by the juxtaposition of these two seemingly incongruous trends, our research team set out to untangle the web of interconnectedness that may exist between the production of renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes garnered by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. With a twinkle of curiosity and a surge of statistical rigor, we ventured into uncharted territory, seeking to shed light on this unusual association.
As we delved into the depths of data acquisition and analysis, the prevailing question emerged: could there be an illuminating connection between the generation of sustainable energy and the magnetic allure of lock-picking finesse? The initial skepticism towards such a correlation was swiftly overshadowed by the gleam of intriguing possibilities, prompting a rigorous exploration of the entwined paths of renewable energy and lock-picking enthusiasm.
In this paper, we present the results of our exhaustive investigation, which introduces a novel perspective on the unforeseen interplay between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking. Our findings not only illuminate potential linkages between these divergent realms but also underscore the intricacies of societal engagement and the captivating nature of public interest. As we embark on this illuminating journey, we invite the reader to join us in uncovering the unexpected, whether it be the capture of sunlight or the unlocking of secrets, for in the world of research, there is always a glimmer of discovery waiting to be revealed.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9939426, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9879219, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These results not only raise eyebrows but also open the floodgates of curiosity, inviting further exploration into the unexpected connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena.

As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot portrays a compelling narrative of the synchronized dance between renewable energy trends and the enchanting allure of lock-picking finesse. The data points waltz across the plot with a harmony that mirrors the melody of a well-picked lock, capturing the essence of interconnectedness between these two contrasting domains.

Our findings uncover a captivating interplay that transcends traditional boundaries, shedding light on the notion that societal engagement knows no bounds, whether it be harnessed from the sun's rays or the loving tap of a "like" button on a YouTube video. While the initial appearance of this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or perhaps a lock pick in an unexpected place – our results bring to the forefront the subtle yet significant associations that permeate the fabric of public interest and engagement.

The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, resonating with the broader theme of interconnectedness in the scientific landscape. As our understanding of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to evolve, it beckons us to embrace the unexpected, to unravel the mysteries that lie in the unlikeliest of pairings, and to acknowledge that in the world of research, there are always hidden connections waiting to be unlocked.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the curious correlation between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos stands at the intersection of unconventional inquiries and uncharted scholarly landscapes. Previous literature has sought to shed light on the intricacies of renewable energy trends, with authors Smith and Doe (2018) elucidating the multifaceted dynamics of energy transition and the societal impacts of sustainable initiatives. Similarly, Jones (2019) delved into the complexities of public engagement with renewable energy, illuminating the patterns of societal interest and enthusiasm for environmentally conscious practices.
The world of lock picking, though seemingly esoteric, has also garnered scholarly attention, with works such as "The Art of Lockpicking" by Lockhart (2017) offering keen insights into the historical, technical, and cultural dimensions of this enigmatic craft. Furthermore, "Criminal Lock Picking: A Handbook on How to Pick Different Types of Locks" by Turnquist (2020) delves into the practical applications of lock picking, intertwining theoretical knowledge with real-world scenarios.
Turning to the more imaginative realm of fiction, the works of Dan Brown, particularly "The Da Vinci Code," and its exploration of cryptic codes and enigmatic mechanisms draw tangential parallels to the intricacies of lock picking and the allure of uncovering hidden truths. Similarly, the escapades of Sherlock Holmes, as penned by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, evoke a sense of intrigue and problem-solving prowess that resonates with the art of navigating security systems.
As we traverse through the landscape of unconventional literature and scholarly pursuits, it becomes evident that unorthodox connections can often yield unexpected insights, much like how a random assortment of items on a CVS receipt might hold the key to decoding complex societal trends. In this context, our literature review extends beyond the traditional confines of scholarly works, embracing the unanticipated and embracing the unexpected as we illuminate the unexplored connections between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9939426, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9879219, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These results not only raise eyebrows but also open the floodgates of curiosity, inviting further exploration into the unexpected connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot portrays a compelling narrative of the synchronized dance between renewable energy trends and the enchanting allure of lock-picking finesse. The data points waltz across the plot with a harmony that mirrors the melody of a well-picked lock, capturing the essence of interconnectedness between these two contrasting domains.
Our findings uncover a captivating interplay that transcends traditional boundaries, shedding light on the notion that societal engagement knows no bounds, whether it be harnessed from the sun's rays or the loving tap of a "like" button on a YouTube video. While the initial appearance of this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or perhaps a lock pick in an unexpected place – our results bring to the forefront the subtle yet significant associations that permeate the fabric of public interest and engagement.
The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, resonating with the broader theme of interconnectedness in the scientific landscape. As our understanding of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to evolve, it beckons us to embrace the unexpected, to unravel the mysteries that lie in the unlikeliest of pairings, and to acknowledge that in the world of research, there are always hidden connections waiting to be unlocked.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation unveil a tantalizing connection between renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. The strikingly high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value underscore the intricate dance between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings not only corroborate prior research on the unpredictability of societal engagement but also highlight the exuberant nature of statistical relationships – akin to the unpredictable nature of fidgety tumblers in a lock.

Harking back to the literature review, it is clear that the unexpected connections in unconventional literature and scholarly pursuits often lead to surprising insights, not unlike the revelation of a previously unnoticed security flaw. Just as the fictional adventures of Sherlock Holmes can captivate our imagination, the real-world interplay between renewable energy and lock picking has managed to capture our statistical scrutiny. It seems that, much like a master locksmith's appreciation for every pin and tumbler in a lock, our statistical analysis has uncovered the seemingly correlated movements of renewable energy production and YouTube likes.

Our findings not only support the prior research on renewable energy trends and public engagement but also underscore the need for continued exploration into unanticipated connections that may lie beneath the surface of seemingly disparate phenomena. As the obscure art of lock picking finds an unexpected companion in the realm of renewable energy trends, it beckons researchers to peer past the traditional boundaries and embrace the interplay between improbable bedfellows, much like a lock and its key.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Renewable energy production in Belgium and Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of renewable energy has long been an illuminating subject within scientific discourse, shedding light on the sustainable future of our planet. Conversely, the fascination with lock picking has often been regarded as an obscure, albeit intriguing, pastime that has captured the attention of a surprisingly large audience. These two seemingly unrelated phenomena have been subjects of individual studies and analyses; however, the potential relationship between renewable energy production and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has largely remained in the dark.
In recent years, Belgium has emerged as a beacon of renewable energy production, drawing attention not only to its efforts in reducing carbon emissions but also to its notable strides in wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer, with his deft hands and unparalleled finesse, has garnered a substantial following on YouTube, mesmerizing viewers with the art and precision of lock picking while simultaneously providing an unexpected education on the vulnerabilities of security systems.
Intrigued by the juxtaposition of these two seemingly incongruous trends, our research team set out to untangle the web of interconnectedness that may exist between the production of renewable energy in Belgium and the total likes garnered by the LockPickingLawyer's videos. With a twinkle of curiosity and a surge of statistical rigor, we ventured into uncharted territory, seeking to shed light on this unusual association.
As we delved into the depths of data acquisition and analysis, the prevailing question emerged: could there be an illuminating connection between the generation of sustainable energy and the magnetic allure of lock-picking finesse? The initial skepticism towards such a correlation was swiftly overshadowed by the gleam of intriguing possibilities, prompting a rigorous exploration of the entwined paths of renewable energy and lock-picking enthusiasm.
In this paper, we present the results of our exhaustive investigation, which introduces a novel perspective on the unforeseen interplay between renewable energy production and the fascination with lock picking. Our findings not only illuminate potential linkages between these divergent realms but also underscore the intricacies of societal engagement and the captivating nature of public interest. As we embark on this illuminating journey, we invite the reader to join us in uncovering the unexpected, whether it be the capture of sunlight or the unlocking of secrets, for in the world of research, there is always a glimmer of discovery waiting to be revealed.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos revealed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9939426, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9879219, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These results not only raise eyebrows but also open the floodgates of curiosity, inviting further exploration into the unexpected connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena.
As shown in Fig. 1, the scatterplot portrays a compelling narrative of the synchronized dance between renewable energy trends and the enchanting allure of lock-picking finesse. The data points waltz across the plot with a harmony that mirrors the melody of a well-picked lock, capturing the essence of interconnectedness between these two contrasting domains.
Our findings uncover a captivating interplay that transcends traditional boundaries, shedding light on the notion that societal engagement knows no bounds, whether it be harnessed from the sun's rays or the loving tap of a "like" button on a YouTube video. While the initial appearance of this correlation may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or perhaps a lock pick in an unexpected place – our results bring to the forefront the subtle yet significant associations that permeate the fabric of public interest and engagement.
The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, resonating with the broader theme of interconnectedness in the scientific landscape. As our understanding of seemingly unrelated phenomena continues to evolve, it beckons us to embrace the unexpected, to unravel the mysteries that lie in the unlikeliest of pairings, and to acknowledge that in the world of research, there are always hidden connections waiting to be unlocked.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only shed light on the unexpected and intriguing correlation between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes garnered by LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, but it has also uncovered the hidden interconnectedness between seemingly disparate realms. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and the mesmerizing dance of data points on the scatterplot serve as a testament to the unexpected harmony between sustainable energy trends and the magnetic allure of lock picking finesse.

As we reflect on these findings, it is evident that the world of research is reminiscent of a well-picked lock, revealing surprising connections and unlocking the door to new insights. This unexpected correlation not only underscores the captivating nature of societal engagement but also emphasizes the need to embrace unconventional perspectives and explore uncharted territories in the scientific landscape. After all, in the world of research, there is always the potential for unforeseen connections waiting to be revealed, whether it's the fusion of renewable energy or the allure of lock-picking finesse.

In light of these compelling results, we are compelled to assert that further research in this area is unnecessary. The correlation between renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has been firmly established, and it is high time for these unexpected associations to bask in the spotlight, much like the sustainable glow of renewable energy and the captivating allure of lock-picking finesse. As we close this chapter of research, we invite fellow enthusiasts to venture into uncharted territories and embrace the unexpected, for the world of research is abound with hidden connections waiting to be illuminated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Renewable Energy and Security Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Sustainable Illumination and Locksmithing Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shining Bright: The Plight of Renewable Light and Lock-Picking Delight with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the seemingly disparate worlds of renewable energy production in Belgium and the total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Using data from the Energy Information Administration and YouTube, our research team sought to unearth any potential correlations between the two variables. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9939426 and a statistical significance (p < 0.01) for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2021. While initially unexpected, this finding shines a light on the intricacies of public interest and societal enthusiasm, illustrating the interconnectedness between renewable energy trends and the fascination with the art of lock picking. Our results highlight the need for further investigation into the potential ripple effects of renewable energy advancements on unexpected facets of societal engagement, whether it's a bolt cutter, a lock, or a YouTube like button.

ChatGPT:

renewable energy, Belgium, energy production, Energy Information Administration, YouTube, correlation, statistical significance, public interest, societal enthusiasm, lock picking, LockPickingLawyer, renewable energy advancements, societal engagement, ripple effects

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Renewable energy production in Belgium
Detailed data title: Total renewable energy production in Belgium in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Renewable energy production in Belgium

Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9939426 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9879219 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Renewable energy production in Belgium) over the 7 years from 2015 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.5E-6. 0.0000054671512787842640000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.00055% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 182,911 random variables You don't actually need 182 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2015201620172018201920202021
Renewable energy production in Belgium (Billion kWh)15.698815.572217.102118.333920.609324.485722.7492
Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos (Total likes)216663455464230743044961505905330102693008602380




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  6. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15.6988,15.5722,17.1021,18.3339,20.6093,24.4857,22.7492,])
array_2 = np.array([216663,455464,2307430,4496150,5905330,10269300,8602380,])
array_1_name = "Renewable energy production in Belgium"
array_2_name = "Total likes of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4882 · Black Variable ID: 23507 · Red Variable ID: 25772
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0