about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,970 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the second variable is Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2015 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

Well, as the number of dental assistants in Wyoming increased, so did their access to tiny, intricate tools on a daily basis. This inadvertently sparked a trend of incredibly efficient and precise lock picking among dental professionals. The LockPickingLawyer, realizing the potential of this untapped market, began creating longer and more elaborate videos to cater to this newfound audience of dental superstars with a knack for getting to the root of any lock problem. The result? A surge in total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, all thanks to the dental assistants of Wyoming showing off their unexpected lock-picking prowess between appointments!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image of a bright dental office in Wyoming where dental assistants, equipped with tiny, intricate tools, are showcasing their impressive knack for precision lock picking. In the background, the LockPickingLawyer is creating longer and more elaborate YouTube videos in response to this trend. The scene should capture the surge in total length of the LockPickingLawyer's videos due to the dental assistants' newfound lock-picking skills." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre A scene from Skyrim Concept art Macabre Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, in the following situation: Well, as the number of dental assistants in Wyoming increased, so did their access to tiny, intricate tools on a daily basis. This inadvertently sparked a trend of incredibly efficient and precise lock picking among dental professionals. The LockPickingLawyer, realizing the potential of this untapped market, began creating longer and more elaborate videos to cater to this newfound audience of dental superstars with a knack for getting to the root of any lock problem. The result? A surge in total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, all thanks to the dental assistants of Wyoming showing off their unexpected lock-picking prowess between appointments!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bright dental office in Wyoming, the number of dental assistants has increased. They are now equipped with tiny, intricate tools, and as a result, they have developed an impressive knack for precision lock picking. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer has responded to this trend by creating longer and more elaborate YouTube videos. In the background, dental assistants showcase their newfound lock-picking skills, contributing to the surge in total length of LockPickingLawyer's videos.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a bright dental office in Wyoming, the number of dental assistants has increased. They are now equipped with tiny, intricate tools, and as a result, they have developed an impressive knack for precision lock picking. Meanwhile, the LockPickingLawyer has responded to this trend by creating longer and more elaborate YouTube videos. In the background, dental assistants showcase their newfound lock-picking skills, contributing to the surge in total length of LockPickingLawyer's videos. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image of a bright dental office in Wyoming where dental assistants, equipped with tiny, intricate tools, are showcasing their impressive knack for precision lock picking. In the background, the LockPickingLawyer is creating longer and more elaborate YouTube videos in response to this trend. The scene should capture the surge in total length of the LockPickingLawyer's videos due to the dental assistants' newfound lock-picking skills."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of dental assistants in Wyoming positively influenced Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos

The Journal of Dental Hygiene and Unconventional Skills Review

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and p < 0.01 for 2015 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Of all the unusual pairings one could imagine, the relationship between dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube may seem like a far-fetched one, akin to comparing apples to wrenches. Yet, it is precisely this eyebrow-raising association that has piqued the curiosity of the scientific community and prompted us to embark on this unconventional investigation. At first glance, one might wonder what the meticulous work of dental professionals has to do with the captivating clips of locks being skillfully picked. However, as we delve into the data and statistical analyses, the unexpected parallels between these two disparate domains begin to unravel, forming a narrative that is as unexpected as it is amusing.

We found ourselves walking a fine line between skepticism and astonishment upon stumbling onto this seemingly inexplicable link. To approach this enigmatic conundrum, we sought to employ rigorous statistical methods and analytical tools that would allow us to shine a light on this bewildering correlation. Little did we anticipate that our analysis would reveal a correlation coefficient so high, it almost seemed as though it was deliberately locked in place. Our adventure into the realm of data led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, which left us both astounded and chuckling at the statistical serendipity of it all.

Moreover, not content with merely scratching the surface, we uncovered a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between these two variables was not merely a fluke, but a curious coincidence worth exploring further. As we peered deeper into the time period from 2015 to 2022, we couldn't shake off the amusing thought that perhaps there's more to the dental field than meets the eye, and likewise, more to the art of lock-picking than we had previously appreciated.

This unexpected alignment of dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube brings about a humorous juxtaposition of precision, dexterity, and attention to detail that we simply cannot overlook. It invites us to ponder the uncanny parallel between the delicate art of oral care and the nimble manipulation of locks, prompting us to entertain the whimsical idea that perhaps dental assistants possess a hidden talent for finesse and intricacy beyond their expertise in teeth and gums. The absurdity of this notion only serves to lure us further into the labyrinth of improbable connections, leaving us with a sense of wonder and an eagerness to unravel the mysteries hidden in the interwoven fabric of professional vocations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Of all the unusual pairings one could imagine, the relationship between dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube may seem like a far-fetched one, akin to comparing apples to wrenches. Yet, it is precisely this eyebrow-raising association that has piqued the curiosity of the scientific community and prompted us to embark on this unconventional investigation. At first glance, one might wonder what the meticulous work of dental professionals has to do with the captivating clips of locks being skillfully picked. However, as we delve into the data and statistical analyses, the unexpected parallels between these two disparate domains begin to unravel, forming a narrative that is as unexpected as it is amusing.
We found ourselves walking a fine line between skepticism and astonishment upon stumbling onto this seemingly inexplicable link. To approach this enigmatic conundrum, we sought to employ rigorous statistical methods and analytical tools that would allow us to shine a light on this bewildering correlation. Little did we anticipate that our analysis would reveal a correlation coefficient so high, it almost seemed as though it was deliberately locked in place. Our adventure into the realm of data led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, which left us both astounded and chuckling at the statistical serendipity of it all.
Moreover, not content with merely scratching the surface, we uncovered a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between these two variables was not merely a fluke, but a curious coincidence worth exploring further. As we peered deeper into the time period from 2015 to 2022, we couldn't shake off the amusing thought that perhaps there's more to the dental field than meets the eye, and likewise, more to the art of lock-picking than we had previously appreciated.
This unexpected alignment of dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube brings about a humorous juxtaposition of precision, dexterity, and attention to detail that we simply cannot overlook. It invites us to ponder the uncanny parallel between the delicate art of oral care and the nimble manipulation of locks, prompting us to entertain the whimsical idea that perhaps dental assistants possess a hidden talent for finesse and intricacy beyond their expertise in teeth and gums. The absurdity of this notion only serves to lure us further into the labyrinth of improbable connections, leaving us with a sense of wonder and an eagerness to unravel the mysteries hidden in the interwoven fabric of professional vocations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The surprising nexus between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total duration of videos by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform has intrigued many in the research community. This unconventional association has prompted a thorough examination of existing literature to discern any potential historical or theoretical underpinnings that may elucidate this unexpected correlation.

In their study, Smith and Doe (2017) explored the occupational trends in dental healthcare, shedding light on the demands and responsibilities of dental assistants in various regions. While their focus was centered on workforce dynamics, their findings provided valuable insight into the diverse skill sets and adaptability of dental professionals. Jones (2019) also contributed to this body of knowledge, emphasizing the significance of precision and attention to detail in the practice of dental assistance, qualities that are central to the success of lock-picking endeavors highlighted in the LockPickingLawyer videos.

Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Art of Lock Picking" by Eddie the Lock (2016) and "The Complete Guide to Dental Assisting" by Smith and Johnson (2018) provided invaluable insights into the technical and artistic aspects of these respective disciplines. These works, alongside numerous others, presented captivating narratives of proficiency and delicacy, twining together the threads of manual dexterity, fine motor skills, and meticulous attention to detail that resonate with the themes emerging from our own research.

Furthermore, the fiction domain also offered intriguing parallels. "The Lockpick Society" by A. Mysterious Author (2020) and "The Secret Lives of Dental Assistants" by Fictional Writer (2019) drew upon the mystique and intrigue pervading both fields, weaving tales of intrigue and mastery that mirrored the unexpected correlation discovered in our analyses.

In an entirely different vein, the unconventional sources such as the backs of shampoo bottles and cookie fortunes surprisingly offered some insightful comical relief and quirky observations on the interplay of intricate manipulations, albeit in a metaphorical sense. Despite the inherent lightheartedness of these sources, they invited a humorous reflection on the unexpected congruence between the precision of dental assistants and the deftness of lock-picking showcased in the LockPickingLawyer's videos.

As we surveyed the diverse array of literature, we couldn't help but marvel at the serendipitous connections and whimsical associations that emerged from unlikely sources, underscoring the unpredictably delightful nature of interdisciplinary research and inviting us to embrace the humor in our pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2015 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Of all the unusual pairings one could imagine, the relationship between dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube may seem like a far-fetched one, akin to comparing apples to wrenches. Yet, it is precisely this eyebrow-raising association that has piqued the curiosity of the scientific community and prompted us to embark on this unconventional investigation. At first glance, one might wonder what the meticulous work of dental professionals has to do with the captivating clips of locks being skillfully picked. However, as we delve into the data and statistical analyses, the unexpected parallels between these two disparate domains begin to unravel, forming a narrative that is as unexpected as it is amusing.
We found ourselves walking a fine line between skepticism and astonishment upon stumbling onto this seemingly inexplicable link. To approach this enigmatic conundrum, we sought to employ rigorous statistical methods and analytical tools that would allow us to shine a light on this bewildering correlation. Little did we anticipate that our analysis would reveal a correlation coefficient so high, it almost seemed as though it was deliberately locked in place. Our adventure into the realm of data led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, which left us both astounded and chuckling at the statistical serendipity of it all.
Moreover, not content with merely scratching the surface, we uncovered a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between these two variables was not merely a fluke, but a curious coincidence worth exploring further. As we peered deeper into the time period from 2015 to 2022, we couldn't shake off the amusing thought that perhaps there's more to the dental field than meets the eye, and likewise, more to the art of lock-picking than we had previously appreciated.
This unexpected alignment of dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube brings about a humorous juxtaposition of precision, dexterity, and attention to detail that we simply cannot overlook. It invites us to ponder the uncanny parallel between the delicate art of oral care and the nimble manipulation of locks, prompting us to entertain the whimsical idea that perhaps dental assistants possess a hidden talent for finesse and intricacy beyond their expertise in teeth and gums. The absurdity of this notion only serves to lure us further into the labyrinth of improbable connections, leaving us with a sense of wonder and an eagerness to unravel the mysteries hidden in the interwoven fabric of professional vocations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the mysterious relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, our research team employed a blend of traditional statistical methods and unconventional investigative approaches. Firstly, we gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to capture the fluctuations in the population of dental assistants in the state of Wyoming from 2015 to 2022. The meticulous data extraction process was akin to navigating a labyrinth of dental records, carefully flossing out the necessary information to build a comprehensive dataset.

Simultaneously, we embarked on a digital quest through the vast expanse of YouTube, where we painstakingly tallied the total duration of LockPickingLawyer's videos over the same time period. It was no small feat to sieve through the myriad of lock-picking demonstrations, and one might say we found ourselves in a 'pick-le' by the sheer volume of content. Nevertheless, armed with determination, we triumphed over this digital jungle and collected the data needed to illuminate the connection between dental assistants and lock manipulation aficionados.

With our dataset in hand, we turned to the illustrious world of statistics to conduct our analysis. Employing robust regression models and sophisticated correlation analyses, we delved into the numerical realm, seeking to reveal patterns that might unlock the cryptic relationship between our variables. Our investigations were akin to unraveling a tangled bundle of dental floss and lockpicking tools—a twist and turn at every step, as we navigated the intricate web of numerical intricacies.

Furthermore, our analysis involved the use of advanced statistical software, which we affectionately regarded as the 'key' to unlocking the mysteries concealed within our dataset. In this digital laboratory, we wielded the power of statistical wizardry, conjuring correlations and p-values with a flourish that would make even the most accomplished illusionist envious.

It is important to note that, while our approach may appear unconventional, it was underpinned by a commitment to scientific rigor and thoroughness. We juggled an array of statistical methodologies with a light-hearted demeanor, recognizing that the quest for knowledge is inevitably sprinkled with both moments of perplexity and joyous discovery.

In summary, our methodology intricately blended the rigors of statistical analysis with the playful curiosity of uncovering unexpected associations, setting the stage for a scientific journey that would leave even the most seasoned researchers amused and captivated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2015 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9847603, r-squared of 0.9697528, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Of all the unusual pairings one could imagine, the relationship between dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube may seem like a far-fetched one, akin to comparing apples to wrenches. Yet, it is precisely this eyebrow-raising association that has piqued the curiosity of the scientific community and prompted us to embark on this unconventional investigation. At first glance, one might wonder what the meticulous work of dental professionals has to do with the captivating clips of locks being skillfully picked. However, as we delve into the data and statistical analyses, the unexpected parallels between these two disparate domains begin to unravel, forming a narrative that is as unexpected as it is amusing.
We found ourselves walking a fine line between skepticism and astonishment upon stumbling onto this seemingly inexplicable link. To approach this enigmatic conundrum, we sought to employ rigorous statistical methods and analytical tools that would allow us to shine a light on this bewildering correlation. Little did we anticipate that our analysis would reveal a correlation coefficient so high, it almost seemed as though it was deliberately locked in place. Our adventure into the realm of data led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, which left us both astounded and chuckling at the statistical serendipity of it all.
Moreover, not content with merely scratching the surface, we uncovered a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between these two variables was not merely a fluke, but a curious coincidence worth exploring further. As we peered deeper into the time period from 2015 to 2022, we couldn't shake off the amusing thought that perhaps there's more to the dental field than meets the eye, and likewise, more to the art of lock-picking than we had previously appreciated.
This unexpected alignment of dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube brings about a humorous juxtaposition of precision, dexterity, and attention to detail that we simply cannot overlook. It invites us to ponder the uncanny parallel between the delicate art of oral care and the nimble manipulation of locks, prompting us to entertain the whimsical idea that perhaps dental assistants possess a hidden talent for finesse and intricacy beyond their expertise in teeth and gums. The absurdity of this notion only serves to lure us further into the labyrinth of improbable connections, leaving us with a sense of wonder and an eagerness to unravel the mysteries hidden in the interwoven fabric of professional vocations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the dizzyingly divergent worlds of dental assistants and lock-picking on YouTube culminated in a statistically robust exploration, yielding results that were both eyebrow-raising and knee-slapping in their revelatory nature. Through our rigorous analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, suggesting that the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos are mysteriously intertwined. This highly significant correlation was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.9697528, reaffirming the strength of this unlikely relationship.

The sheer magnitude of this correlation prompted numerous tongue-in-cheek speculations and wisecracks among the research team, as we found ourselves contemplating the potential tandempairing of dental floss with locksmithing tools, and other punny permutations. The statistical fortitude of this correlation left us marveling at the unlikely kinship between these two seemingly incongruous domains, evoking both amusement and bemusement in equal measure.

Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this association defied the odds and beckoned us to dive deeper into its enigmatic depths, as this unearthed connection persisted despite our initial disbelief. These findings serve as a poignant reminder of the capricious nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected revelations that often lie in wait amidst the most unlikely pairings.

Remarkably, the correlation between the number of dental assistants in the state of Wyoming and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations on the YouTube platform is vividly captured in the scatterplot illustrated in Figure 1, which showcases the striking alignment of these two variables. As we gazed upon this graphical representation of the dental assistants-dentally picked connection, we found ourselves succumbing to both incredulity and laughter, our preconceptions shattered by the undeniable evidence before us.

In conclusion, our findings not only highlight the statistical salience of this unorthodox correlation but also beckon us to revel in the whimsy and wonderment of scientific discovery. The dental assistants-dentally picked connection serves as a testament to the often unpredictable and delightfully absurd facets of statistical inquiry, reminding us that even the most improbable pairings can unveil captivating insights and elicit a hearty chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The surprising nexus between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total duration of videos by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform has intrigued many in the research community. This unconventional association has prompted a thorough examination of existing literature to discern any potential historical or theoretical underpinnings that may elucidate this unexpected correlation.
In their study, Smith and Doe (2017) explored the occupational trends in dental healthcare, shedding light on the demands and responsibilities of dental assistants in various regions. While their focus was centered on workforce dynamics, their findings provided valuable insight into the diverse skill sets and adaptability of dental professionals. Jones (2019) also contributed to this body of knowledge, emphasizing the significance of precision and attention to detail in the practice of dental assistance, qualities that are central to the success of lock-picking endeavors highlighted in the LockPickingLawyer videos.
Delving into the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Art of Lock Picking" by Eddie the Lock (2016) and "The Complete Guide to Dental Assisting" by Smith and Johnson (2018) provided invaluable insights into the technical and artistic aspects of these respective disciplines. These works, alongside numerous others, presented captivating narratives of proficiency and delicacy, twining together the threads of manual dexterity, fine motor skills, and meticulous attention to detail that resonate with the themes emerging from our own research.
Furthermore, the fiction domain also offered intriguing parallels. "The Lockpick Society" by A. Mysterious Author (2020) and "The Secret Lives of Dental Assistants" by Fictional Writer (2019) drew upon the mystique and intrigue pervading both fields, weaving tales of intrigue and mastery that mirrored the unexpected correlation discovered in our analyses.
In an entirely different vein, the unconventional sources such as the backs of shampoo bottles and cookie fortunes surprisingly offered some insightful comical relief and quirky observations on the interplay of intricate manipulations, albeit in a metaphorical sense. Despite the inherent lightheartedness of these sources, they invited a humorous reflection on the unexpected congruence between the precision of dental assistants and the deftness of lock-picking showcased in the LockPickingLawyer's videos.
As we surveyed the diverse array of literature, we couldn't help but marvel at the serendipitous connections and whimsical associations that emerged from unlikely sources, underscoring the unpredictably delightful nature of interdisciplinary research and inviting us to embrace the humor in our pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the dizzyingly divergent worlds of dental assistants and lock-picking on YouTube culminated in a statistically robust exploration, yielding results that were both eyebrow-raising and knee-slapping in their revelatory nature. Through our rigorous analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, suggesting that the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos are mysteriously intertwined. This highly significant correlation was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.9697528, reaffirming the strength of this unlikely relationship.
The sheer magnitude of this correlation prompted numerous tongue-in-cheek speculations and wisecracks among the research team, as we found ourselves contemplating the potential tandempairing of dental floss with locksmithing tools, and other punny permutations. The statistical fortitude of this correlation left us marveling at the unlikely kinship between these two seemingly incongruous domains, evoking both amusement and bemusement in equal measure.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this association defied the odds and beckoned us to dive deeper into its enigmatic depths, as this unearthed connection persisted despite our initial disbelief. These findings serve as a poignant reminder of the capricious nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected revelations that often lie in wait amidst the most unlikely pairings.
Remarkably, the correlation between the number of dental assistants in the state of Wyoming and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations on the YouTube platform is vividly captured in the scatterplot illustrated in Figure 1, which showcases the striking alignment of these two variables. As we gazed upon this graphical representation of the dental assistants-dentally picked connection, we found ourselves succumbing to both incredulity and laughter, our preconceptions shattered by the undeniable evidence before us.
In conclusion, our findings not only highlight the statistical salience of this unorthodox correlation but also beckon us to revel in the whimsy and wonderment of scientific discovery. The dental assistants-dentally picked connection serves as a testament to the often unpredictable and delightfully absurd facets of statistical inquiry, reminding us that even the most improbable pairings can unveil captivating insights and elicit a hearty chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the ever-unfolding saga of the dental assistants-dentally picked connection, our statistically robust findings have propelled us into the whimsical realm of improbable correlations and lighthearted reflections. The results of our study not only confirmed, but also amplified, the earlier research endeavors that highlighted the surprising parallels between the dental and lock-picking domains.

In the spirit of delving into the unexpected, our findings affirmed the curious correlation between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total duration of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos, accentuating the uncanny kinship between these seemingly distant professions. As the statistical numbers unraveled this peculiar connection, our research team couldn't help but playfully ponder the potential collaborative endeavors of dental floss and lock-picking tools, offering a comical perspective on the interplay of these two variables.

Drawing from the eccentric insights gleaned from the literature review, our results echoed the poignant musings of Smith and Doe (2017), Jones (2019), and the metaphorical wisdom of shampoo bottles and cookie fortunes, as we reveled in the quirky intersection between precision, delicacy, and the meticulous attention to detail in both the dental and lock-picking realms. As the correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and the p-value of less than 0.01 emphatically validated this unlikely association, our findings reinforced the humorous observations and lively anecdotes that punctuated our research journey.

In this merry dance of statistical revelation, the scatterplot displayed a visual symphony of alignment between dental assistants and the craft of lock-picking, inviting us to embrace the indomitable spirit of statistical wanderlust and the chuckles that accompany each unforeseen discovery. The r-squared value of 0.9697528 further bolstered the strength of this correlation, demonstrating the statistical mettle that underpins this unexpected partnership and eliciting whimsical contemplations on the delightful caprice of interdisciplinary associations.

Our study's findings, steeped in statistical significance and mirthful reflection, beckon scholars to embrace the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry and revel in the unexpected chuckles and revelations that lie in the harmonious blend of dental assistants and lock-picking escapades. As we pause to savor the delightful absurdity of our statistically sound yet unexpectedly humorous findings, we are reminded that even the unlikeliest of pairings can unravel tantalizing insights and prompt a hearty giggle or two amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dental assistants in Wyoming and Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Of all the unusual pairings one could imagine, the relationship between dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube may seem like a far-fetched one, akin to comparing apples to wrenches. Yet, it is precisely this eyebrow-raising association that has piqued the curiosity of the scientific community and prompted us to embark on this unconventional investigation. At first glance, one might wonder what the meticulous work of dental professionals has to do with the captivating clips of locks being skillfully picked. However, as we delve into the data and statistical analyses, the unexpected parallels between these two disparate domains begin to unravel, forming a narrative that is as unexpected as it is amusing.
We found ourselves walking a fine line between skepticism and astonishment upon stumbling onto this seemingly inexplicable link. To approach this enigmatic conundrum, we sought to employ rigorous statistical methods and analytical tools that would allow us to shine a light on this bewildering correlation. Little did we anticipate that our analysis would reveal a correlation coefficient so high, it almost seemed as though it was deliberately locked in place. Our adventure into the realm of data led us to the discovery of a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, which left us both astounded and chuckling at the statistical serendipity of it all.
Moreover, not content with merely scratching the surface, we uncovered a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between these two variables was not merely a fluke, but a curious coincidence worth exploring further. As we peered deeper into the time period from 2015 to 2022, we couldn't shake off the amusing thought that perhaps there's more to the dental field than meets the eye, and likewise, more to the art of lock-picking than we had previously appreciated.
This unexpected alignment of dental assistants and lock-picking videos on YouTube brings about a humorous juxtaposition of precision, dexterity, and attention to detail that we simply cannot overlook. It invites us to ponder the uncanny parallel between the delicate art of oral care and the nimble manipulation of locks, prompting us to entertain the whimsical idea that perhaps dental assistants possess a hidden talent for finesse and intricacy beyond their expertise in teeth and gums. The absurdity of this notion only serves to lure us further into the labyrinth of improbable connections, leaving us with a sense of wonder and an eagerness to unravel the mysteries hidden in the interwoven fabric of professional vocations.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the dizzyingly divergent worlds of dental assistants and lock-picking on YouTube culminated in a statistically robust exploration, yielding results that were both eyebrow-raising and knee-slapping in their revelatory nature. Through our rigorous analysis, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603, suggesting that the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos are mysteriously intertwined. This highly significant correlation was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.9697528, reaffirming the strength of this unlikely relationship.
The sheer magnitude of this correlation prompted numerous tongue-in-cheek speculations and wisecracks among the research team, as we found ourselves contemplating the potential tandempairing of dental floss with locksmithing tools, and other punny permutations. The statistical fortitude of this correlation left us marveling at the unlikely kinship between these two seemingly incongruous domains, evoking both amusement and bemusement in equal measure.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, this association defied the odds and beckoned us to dive deeper into its enigmatic depths, as this unearthed connection persisted despite our initial disbelief. These findings serve as a poignant reminder of the capricious nature of statistical analyses and the unexpected revelations that often lie in wait amidst the most unlikely pairings.
Remarkably, the correlation between the number of dental assistants in the state of Wyoming and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations on the YouTube platform is vividly captured in the scatterplot illustrated in Figure 1, which showcases the striking alignment of these two variables. As we gazed upon this graphical representation of the dental assistants-dentally picked connection, we found ourselves succumbing to both incredulity and laughter, our preconceptions shattered by the undeniable evidence before us.
In conclusion, our findings not only highlight the statistical salience of this unorthodox correlation but also beckon us to revel in the whimsy and wonderment of scientific discovery. The dental assistants-dentally picked connection serves as a testament to the often unpredictable and delightfully absurd facets of statistical inquiry, reminding us that even the most improbable pairings can unveil captivating insights and elicit a hearty chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, the intriguing correlation between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos has left us both amazed and amused. The statistical robustness of the connection, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a p-value of less than 0.01, has captivated our scientific curiosity and sparked numerous comical contemplations about the potential tandempairing of dental floss with locksmithing tools. However, while the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions may inspire whimsical musings, we assert with certainty that no further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dental Hygiene and Unconventional Skills Review


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Dental Hygiene and Lock-Picking Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Dental Assistants-Dentally Picked Connection: A Statistical Analysis of Dental Assistants in Wyoming and LockPickingLawyer YouTube Videos with an abstract of This paper investigates the surprising relationship between the number of dental assistants in Wyoming and the total length of videos produced by the LockPickingLawyer on the YouTube platform. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and YouTube analytics, our research team employed sophisticated statistical analyses to unlock the potential correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9847603 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2015 to 2022. Despite the initial disbelief and skepticism surrounding these unlikely pairings, the findings suggest a strong link between the dental assistant workforce and the duration of lock-picking demonstrations, prompting humorous musings about the dental dexterity and uncanny knack for precision shared by these vastly different professions. This unexpected revelation raises more questions than answers and offers an intriguing juxtaposition of oral care and lock manipulation, which begs further investigation into the curious coincidences and unpredictable connections within the tapestry of professional endeavors.

ChatGPT:

dental assistants, Wyoming, LockPickingLawyer, YouTube videos, statistical analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2015-2022, professional endeavors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of dental assistants in Wyoming
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of dental assistants in Wyoming
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of dental assistants in Wyoming

Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos.
Source: YouTube
See what else correlates with Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9847603 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9697528 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of dental assistants in Wyoming) over the 8 years from 2015 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-6. 0.0000087476691237150470000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.00087% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 114,316 random variables You don't actually need 114 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20152016201720182019202020212022
The number of dental assistants in Wyoming (Dental Assistants)560640640610580550550550
Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos (Total length in seconds)3497297221920316497244483338722916519268




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([560,640,640,610,580,550,550,550,])
array_2 = np.array([34972,97221,92031,64972,44483,33872,29165,19268,])
array_1_name = "The number of dental assistants in Wyoming"
array_2_name = "Total length of LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 4970 · Black Variable ID: 16468 · Red Variable ID: 25774
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0