about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,032 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Layne and the second variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The theory is that every time someone named Layne is born, a simultaneous surge of support for the Democrat candidate is mysteriously generated in Minnesota. Some believe it to be a coincidental cosmic alignment, while others think it could be a secret political strategy linked to baby naming trends. One thing's for sure - the Layne effect on Minnesota politics is real, and it's one nursery rhyme of a situation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy Minnesota nursery where little Layne is being welcomed into the world with joy and laughter. The art style should be reminiscent of 1960s comic book illustration, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. In the background, depict a crowd gathered outside the window engaging in fervent discussions about the upcoming election. As if by magic, with every Layne born, show the Democratic candidate's support in Minnesota growing palpably - a phenomenon noticed by curious onlookers. Illustrate these parallel events unfolding in harmony, with their connection depicted as an enigma that fascinates and captivates the community. Keep the visual depiction simple, without including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s A TIME magazine cover image a Polaroid photo A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota, in the following situation: The theory is that every time someone named Layne is born, a simultaneous surge of support for the Democrat candidate is mysteriously generated in Minnesota. Some believe it to be a coincidental cosmic alignment, while others think it could be a secret political strategy linked to baby naming trends. One thing's for sure - the Layne effect on Minnesota politics is real, and it's one nursery rhyme of a situation!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy Minnesota nursery, little Layne is welcomed into the world with joy and laughter. As the proud parents celebrate, outside the window, a crowd has gathered, caught up in fervent discussions about the upcoming election. As if by magic, with every Layne born, the Democratic candidate's support in Minnesota grows palpably - a phenomenon noticed and pondered by curious onlookers. These parallel events seem to unfold in harmony, their connection an enigma that fascinates and captivates the community.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy Minnesota nursery, little Layne is welcomed into the world with joy and laughter. As the proud parents celebrate, outside the window, a crowd has gathered, caught up in fervent discussions about the upcoming election. As if by magic, with every Layne born, the Democratic candidate's support in Minnesota grows palpably - a phenomenon noticed and pondered by curious onlookers. These parallel events seem to unfold in harmony, their connection an enigma that fascinates and captivates the community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy Minnesota nursery where little Layne is being welcomed into the world with joy and laughter. The art style should be reminiscent of 1960s comic book illustration, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. In the background, depict a crowd gathered outside the window engaging in fervent discussions about the upcoming election. As if by magic, with every Layne born, show the Democratic candidate's support in Minnesota growing palpably - a phenomenon noticed by curious onlookers. Illustrate these parallel events unfolding in harmony, with their connection depicted as an enigma that fascinates and captivates the community. Keep the visual depiction simple, without including any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Layne caused Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes

Journal of Political Popularity and Voting Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the grand symphony of statistical analysis, where variables waltz and correlations cha-cha, there are curious pairings that catch the eye and tickle the funny bone. Our study sets out to unravel one such whimsical conundrum - the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the state of Minnesota. Picture this: a name, synonymous with cool and mystery, taking a tango with the political preferences of Minnesotans. It's a tale as old as statistics – or at least as old as data collection – and we are here to take you on a merry journey through the Land of 10,000 Lakes and statistical mischief.

As academics, we often find ourselves knee-deep in reams of data, crunching numbers and slicing through p-values like a hot knife through butter. But every now and then, a peculiar pairing of variables presents itself, beckoning us to don our detective hats and embark on a statistical adventure. The name Layne, with its enigmatic allure, has waltzed its way into our realm of research, leaving us no choice but to indulge in a delightful dalliance between nomenclature and political inclination. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to witness the captivating collision of demography and democracy, as we travel through time and data to unearth the fascinating relationship between a name and a political leaning.

It's not every day that researchers get to delve into the whimsical world of names and political fervor, but when the stars align and the correlation coefficient whispers sweet nothings in our ears, we dare to explore the uncharted territories of statistical amusement. With a twinkle in our eyes and a robust dataset at our fingertips, we aim to shed light on this unorthodox coupling and, perhaps, inject a dose of levity into the often serious realm of academic inquiry. So, gear up, fellow scholars, for a romp through the realm of "Layne and Left Leaning," where standard deviations meet offbeat observations, and statistical significance shares the stage with captivating curiosity. Let the games begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the grand symphony of statistical analysis, where variables waltz and correlations cha-cha, there are curious pairings that catch the eye and tickle the funny bone. Our study sets out to unravel one such whimsical conundrum - the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the state of Minnesota. Picture this: a name, synonymous with cool and mystery, taking a tango with the political preferences of Minnesotans. It's a tale as old as statistics – or at least as old as data collection – and we are here to take you on a merry journey through the Land of 10,000 Lakes and statistical mischief.
As academics, we often find ourselves knee-deep in reams of data, crunching numbers and slicing through p-values like a hot knife through butter. But every now and then, a peculiar pairing of variables presents itself, beckoning us to don our detective hats and embark on a statistical adventure. The name Layne, with its enigmatic allure, has waltzed its way into our realm of research, leaving us no choice but to indulge in a delightful dalliance between nomenclature and political inclination. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to witness the captivating collision of demography and democracy, as we travel through time and data to unearth the fascinating relationship between a name and a political leaning.
It's not every day that researchers get to delve into the whimsical world of names and political fervor, but when the stars align and the correlation coefficient whispers sweet nothings in our ears, we dare to explore the uncharted territories of statistical amusement. With a twinkle in our eyes and a robust dataset at our fingertips, we aim to shed light on this unorthodox coupling and, perhaps, inject a dose of levity into the often serious realm of academic inquiry. So, gear up, fellow scholars, for a romp through the realm of "Layne and Left Leaning," where standard deviations meet offbeat observations, and statistical significance shares the stage with captivating curiosity. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2010) conducted a seminal study that examined the impact of names on political affiliations, paving the way for our exploration into the relationship between the prevalence of the name Layne and the proclivity for Democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Building upon this foundation, Doe and Jones (2015) expanded the scope of inquiry, delving into the nuanced interplay of nomenclature and electoral behavior across various geographical regions.

But now, let's step out of the realm of serious scholarly works and into the surreal and unexpected. In "Name Games: The Influence of Monikers on Politics" by Lorem and Ipsum, the authors take a whimsical journey through the annals of voter behavior, uncovering surprising connections between names and political leanings, including the unforgettable saga of Layne and the Democrats.

And if that's not unconventional enough for you, how about "The Name Connection: A Political Odyssey" by Terry Tall Tale and Rhonda Rambler? This fictitious yet eerily relevant tome transcends the boundaries of reality and dives headfirst into the mystical realm of name-based political propensities, where Layne and left-leaning become the stuff of legend.

Of course, we can't overlook the cultural impact of cartoons and children's shows on our young, impressionable minds. Who can forget the episode of "Democracy Dilemmas" in the animated series "Political Pals," where Layne, the intrepid protagonist, navigates the intricacies of democratic votes while showcasing an uncanny mastery of statistical analysis? It's a heartwarming tale that captivates both the young and the young at heart, leaving an indelible mark on our collective consciousness.

Entering the arena of statistical analysis with a healthy dose of playfulness and absurdity, we aim to channel the eclectic spirit of these works and infuse our research with a touch of whimsy. After all, what better way to unravel the peculiar pas de deux of Layne and Left Leaning than with a sprinkle of laughter and a dash of delightful absurdity? So, buckle up for a rollercoaster ride through literature, fiction, and childhood nostalgia, as we unearth the enigmatic correlation between a name and a political sway in the unique landscape of Minnesota politics.

Stay tuned for the grand reveal of the mischievous mechanisms behind Layne's journey through the political labyrinth!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1976 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the grand symphony of statistical analysis, where variables waltz and correlations cha-cha, there are curious pairings that catch the eye and tickle the funny bone. Our study sets out to unravel one such whimsical conundrum - the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the state of Minnesota. Picture this: a name, synonymous with cool and mystery, taking a tango with the political preferences of Minnesotans. It's a tale as old as statistics – or at least as old as data collection – and we are here to take you on a merry journey through the Land of 10,000 Lakes and statistical mischief.
As academics, we often find ourselves knee-deep in reams of data, crunching numbers and slicing through p-values like a hot knife through butter. But every now and then, a peculiar pairing of variables presents itself, beckoning us to don our detective hats and embark on a statistical adventure. The name Layne, with its enigmatic allure, has waltzed its way into our realm of research, leaving us no choice but to indulge in a delightful dalliance between nomenclature and political inclination. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to witness the captivating collision of demography and democracy, as we travel through time and data to unearth the fascinating relationship between a name and a political leaning.
It's not every day that researchers get to delve into the whimsical world of names and political fervor, but when the stars align and the correlation coefficient whispers sweet nothings in our ears, we dare to explore the uncharted territories of statistical amusement. With a twinkle in our eyes and a robust dataset at our fingertips, we aim to shed light on this unorthodox coupling and, perhaps, inject a dose of levity into the often serious realm of academic inquiry. So, gear up, fellow scholars, for a romp through the realm of "Layne and Left Leaning," where standard deviations meet offbeat observations, and statistical significance shares the stage with captivating curiosity. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Before delving into the whimsical world of statistical analysis, it's imperative to ensure our methodology is as robust as possible. Our approach combined the rigors of scientific inquiry with a dash of playful curiosity, akin to a scientist wearing a clown nose – serious business, but with a hint of merriment.

Data Collection:
Our plucky team of researchers scoured the internet landscape, navigating through the labyrinth of information superhighway, to collect data from reputable sources. The US Social Security Administration provided us with the delightful details of Layne’s rise to prominence among monikers, while the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, served up a delectable dish of electoral preferences in Minnesota. We gathered data from 1976 to 2020, ensuring a generous spread of years to capture the ebbs and flows of both Layne’s popularity and democratic votes.

Variable Definition:
With a gleam in our eyes and a nod to the gods of research, we defined our key variables with utmost care. The variable "Popularity of the first name Layne" encompassed the frequency of occurrences of this charming moniker in the social fabric, while "Votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in Minnesota" danced its way into our analysis, capturing the political pulse of the Land of 10,000 Lakes. These enchanting variables were the yin and yang of our analysis, swirling together in a statistical waltz that promised to be as intriguing as it was illuminating.

Statistical Analysis:
To unravel the mystery behind the dalliance of Layne and Left Leaning, we deployed an arsenal of statistical tools that would make even the most seasoned statistician crack a smile. We conducted a robust regression model, sprinkling in a dash of time-series analysis for good measure. Our goal was to tease out the intricate connections between the popularity of Layne and the democratic votes, all while keeping an eye out for statistical shenanigans that might lead us astray.

Ethical Considerations:
Just as a good jester knows the bounds of merriment, we were mindful of ethical considerations in our research. All data were handled with the utmost care and respect, ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of individuals behind the numbers. Our goal was not just to entertain with our findings, but also to uphold the principles of ethical research conduct, creating a harmonious blend of mirth and mindfulness in the scholarly arena.

In closing, our methodology was not just a means to an end, but a charming romp through the cornucopia of scientific inquiry, peppered with the spirit of curiosity and an unwavering dedication to rigorous research standards. With our data collected, variables defined, analyses conducted, and ethical compass firmly in hand, we embarked on our delightful journey towards unraveling the enigmatic alliance of Layne and Left Leaning.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1976 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9472869, r-squared of 0.8973525, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the grand symphony of statistical analysis, where variables waltz and correlations cha-cha, there are curious pairings that catch the eye and tickle the funny bone. Our study sets out to unravel one such whimsical conundrum - the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the state of Minnesota. Picture this: a name, synonymous with cool and mystery, taking a tango with the political preferences of Minnesotans. It's a tale as old as statistics – or at least as old as data collection – and we are here to take you on a merry journey through the Land of 10,000 Lakes and statistical mischief.
As academics, we often find ourselves knee-deep in reams of data, crunching numbers and slicing through p-values like a hot knife through butter. But every now and then, a peculiar pairing of variables presents itself, beckoning us to don our detective hats and embark on a statistical adventure. The name Layne, with its enigmatic allure, has waltzed its way into our realm of research, leaving us no choice but to indulge in a delightful dalliance between nomenclature and political inclination. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to witness the captivating collision of demography and democracy, as we travel through time and data to unearth the fascinating relationship between a name and a political leaning.
It's not every day that researchers get to delve into the whimsical world of names and political fervor, but when the stars align and the correlation coefficient whispers sweet nothings in our ears, we dare to explore the uncharted territories of statistical amusement. With a twinkle in our eyes and a robust dataset at our fingertips, we aim to shed light on this unorthodox coupling and, perhaps, inject a dose of levity into the often serious realm of academic inquiry. So, gear up, fellow scholars, for a romp through the realm of "Layne and Left Leaning," where standard deviations meet offbeat observations, and statistical significance shares the stage with captivating curiosity. Let the games begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The time has come to unravel the captivating connection between the popularity of the name Layne and the political preferences of Minnesotans. After meticulously sifting through decades of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team emerged victorious, armed with a formidable correlation coefficient and a cheeky dose of statistical dazzle.

In our boisterous quest for enlightenment, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9472869, gifting us with a wry smile and an undeniable nod to the merriment of statistical anomalies. This robust coefficient serves as a testament to the striking dance between the popularity of Layne and the Democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. With an r-squared value of 0.8973525, we basked in the warmth of a relationship that defies the conventional wisdom of statistical happenstance. And if that weren't enough, our p-value waltzed beneath the cherished threshold of 0.01, adding a touch of flair to our already beguiling findings.

But wait, dear reader, there's more! Behold, the illustrious Fig. 1 – a scatterplot that embodies the resplendent correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the Democratic votes in the enchanting state of Minnesota. As you gaze upon this visual marvel, allow your eyes to twinkle with wonder as the data points waltz across the plot, harmonizing in a mesmerizing display of statistical synchrony.

The culmination of our laborious analysis has uncovered an unorthodox and whimsical link between a name and political persuasions, enriching the tapestry of statistical exploration with a delightful dash of peculiarity. So, without further ado, let us revel in the mirth of Layne and Left Leaning, where statistical mischief meets electoral exuberance, and demography pirouettes with democracy. Cheers to the merriment of empirical discovery!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2010) conducted a seminal study that examined the impact of names on political affiliations, paving the way for our exploration into the relationship between the prevalence of the name Layne and the proclivity for Democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Building upon this foundation, Doe and Jones (2015) expanded the scope of inquiry, delving into the nuanced interplay of nomenclature and electoral behavior across various geographical regions.
But now, let's step out of the realm of serious scholarly works and into the surreal and unexpected. In "Name Games: The Influence of Monikers on Politics" by Lorem and Ipsum, the authors take a whimsical journey through the annals of voter behavior, uncovering surprising connections between names and political leanings, including the unforgettable saga of Layne and the Democrats.
And if that's not unconventional enough for you, how about "The Name Connection: A Political Odyssey" by Terry Tall Tale and Rhonda Rambler? This fictitious yet eerily relevant tome transcends the boundaries of reality and dives headfirst into the mystical realm of name-based political propensities, where Layne and left-leaning become the stuff of legend.
Of course, we can't overlook the cultural impact of cartoons and children's shows on our young, impressionable minds. Who can forget the episode of "Democracy Dilemmas" in the animated series "Political Pals," where Layne, the intrepid protagonist, navigates the intricacies of democratic votes while showcasing an uncanny mastery of statistical analysis? It's a heartwarming tale that captivates both the young and the young at heart, leaving an indelible mark on our collective consciousness.
Entering the arena of statistical analysis with a healthy dose of playfulness and absurdity, we aim to channel the eclectic spirit of these works and infuse our research with a touch of whimsy. After all, what better way to unravel the peculiar pas de deux of Layne and Left Leaning than with a sprinkle of laughter and a dash of delightful absurdity? So, buckle up for a rollercoaster ride through literature, fiction, and childhood nostalgia, as we unearth the enigmatic correlation between a name and a political sway in the unique landscape of Minnesota politics.
Stay tuned for the grand reveal of the mischievous mechanisms behind Layne's journey through the political labyrinth!

[[RESULTS]]
The time has come to unravel the captivating connection between the popularity of the name Layne and the political preferences of Minnesotans. After meticulously sifting through decades of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team emerged victorious, armed with a formidable correlation coefficient and a cheeky dose of statistical dazzle.
In our boisterous quest for enlightenment, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9472869, gifting us with a wry smile and an undeniable nod to the merriment of statistical anomalies. This robust coefficient serves as a testament to the striking dance between the popularity of Layne and the Democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. With an r-squared value of 0.8973525, we basked in the warmth of a relationship that defies the conventional wisdom of statistical happenstance. And if that weren't enough, our p-value waltzed beneath the cherished threshold of 0.01, adding a touch of flair to our already beguiling findings.
But wait, dear reader, there's more! Behold, the illustrious Fig. 1 – a scatterplot that embodies the resplendent correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the Democratic votes in the enchanting state of Minnesota. As you gaze upon this visual marvel, allow your eyes to twinkle with wonder as the data points waltz across the plot, harmonizing in a mesmerizing display of statistical synchrony.
The culmination of our laborious analysis has uncovered an unorthodox and whimsical link between a name and political persuasions, enriching the tapestry of statistical exploration with a delightful dash of peculiarity. So, without further ado, let us revel in the mirth of Layne and Left Leaning, where statistical mischief meets electoral exuberance, and demography pirouettes with democracy. Cheers to the merriment of empirical discovery!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the delightful romp through statistical analysis and the enigmatic dance of Layne and Left Leaning, our findings have not only validated the prior scholarly works but have also infused the realm of demography and democratic preferences with an added layer of whimsy.

Drawing inspiration from the quirk-laden literature review, where we dabbled in the cultural impact of cartoons and children's shows on political propensities, we've managed to unravel a correlation coefficient worthy of a standing ovation. Our results align with the previous scholarly works, showcasing a robust statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Layne and the proclivity for Democratic votes in the captivating state of Minnesota.

Channeling the cheerful spirit of "Name Games: The Influence of Monikers on Politics," our research plunges into the blissful chaos of nomenclature and electoral behavior, leaving us with a correlation coefficient of 0.9472869. This delightful numerical prodigy twirls elegantly within the realm of statistical significance, with a p-value ensuring that our findings are not just a statistical prank played by mischievous data points.

And let's not forget the audacious scatterplot, our Fig. 1, a visual masterpiece that captures the enduring romance between Layne's popularity and the Democratic votes. This enchanting display of data points frolicking across the plot serves as a gentle reminder that even in the land of statistics, there's room for a bit of whimsical charm.

As we bask in the revelry of Layne and Left Leaning, our findings stand as a testament to the captivating synergy between a name and political persuasions, adding a sprinkle of mirth to the tapestry of statistical exploration. So, raise your glasses to the jolly dance of demography and democracy, where Layne takes center stage in the captivating saga of electoral exuberance! Cheers to the merry madness of empirical discovery!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Layne and Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the grand symphony of statistical analysis, where variables waltz and correlations cha-cha, there are curious pairings that catch the eye and tickle the funny bone. Our study sets out to unravel one such whimsical conundrum - the intriguing connection between the popularity of the first name Layne and the votes for the Democratic presidential candidate in the state of Minnesota. Picture this: a name, synonymous with cool and mystery, taking a tango with the political preferences of Minnesotans. It's a tale as old as statistics – or at least as old as data collection – and we are here to take you on a merry journey through the Land of 10,000 Lakes and statistical mischief.
As academics, we often find ourselves knee-deep in reams of data, crunching numbers and slicing through p-values like a hot knife through butter. But every now and then, a peculiar pairing of variables presents itself, beckoning us to don our detective hats and embark on a statistical adventure. The name Layne, with its enigmatic allure, has waltzed its way into our realm of research, leaving us no choice but to indulge in a delightful dalliance between nomenclature and political inclination. So, sit back, relax, and get ready to witness the captivating collision of demography and democracy, as we travel through time and data to unearth the fascinating relationship between a name and a political leaning.
It's not every day that researchers get to delve into the whimsical world of names and political fervor, but when the stars align and the correlation coefficient whispers sweet nothings in our ears, we dare to explore the uncharted territories of statistical amusement. With a twinkle in our eyes and a robust dataset at our fingertips, we aim to shed light on this unorthodox coupling and, perhaps, inject a dose of levity into the often serious realm of academic inquiry. So, gear up, fellow scholars, for a romp through the realm of "Layne and Left Leaning," where standard deviations meet offbeat observations, and statistical significance shares the stage with captivating curiosity. Let the games begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The time has come to unravel the captivating connection between the popularity of the name Layne and the political preferences of Minnesotans. After meticulously sifting through decades of data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, our research team emerged victorious, armed with a formidable correlation coefficient and a cheeky dose of statistical dazzle.
In our boisterous quest for enlightenment, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.9472869, gifting us with a wry smile and an undeniable nod to the merriment of statistical anomalies. This robust coefficient serves as a testament to the striking dance between the popularity of Layne and the Democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. With an r-squared value of 0.8973525, we basked in the warmth of a relationship that defies the conventional wisdom of statistical happenstance. And if that weren't enough, our p-value waltzed beneath the cherished threshold of 0.01, adding a touch of flair to our already beguiling findings.
But wait, dear reader, there's more! Behold, the illustrious Fig. 1 – a scatterplot that embodies the resplendent correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the Democratic votes in the enchanting state of Minnesota. As you gaze upon this visual marvel, allow your eyes to twinkle with wonder as the data points waltz across the plot, harmonizing in a mesmerizing display of statistical synchrony.
The culmination of our laborious analysis has uncovered an unorthodox and whimsical link between a name and political persuasions, enriching the tapestry of statistical exploration with a delightful dash of peculiarity. So, without further ado, let us revel in the mirth of Layne and Left Leaning, where statistical mischief meets electoral exuberance, and demography pirouettes with democracy. Cheers to the merriment of empirical discovery!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In the illustrious saga of statistical tomfoolery, our exploration of Layne's dalliance with Democratic votes in Minnesota has left us chuckling in disbelief. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 and an r-squared value of 0.8973525 have regaled us with a statistical tango fit for the archives of whimsy. With a p-value prancing gleefully under 0.01, our findings have unveiled a relationship so beguiling, it might just prompt a dance-off at the next academic soirée.

As we bid adieu to this delightful escapade, we raise a toast to the jolly anthropomorphic nature of statistical curiosities. The whims of demography and democracy have shared an unexpected pas de deux, enticing us to imagine a world where names and political leanings engage in a merry jig beyond our wildest hypotheses.

In light of these uproarious findings, we assert with utmost certainty that no further research is needed in this area. The mirthful confluence of Layne's popularity and left-leaning votes in Minnesota has been dissected with all the fervor of a statistical carnival, leaving us breathless with laughter and utterly satiated in our quest for analytical amusement.

In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "Good night, good night! Parting is such sweet sorrow, that we shall say good night till it be morrow." And for this whimsical research, we bid adieu, knowing that Layne and left-leaning have left an indelible mark on the annals of statistical jocundity. Cheers to Layne, to left-leaning, and to the capricious wonders of statistical revelry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Political Popularity and Voting Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Midwestern Political Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Ballad of Layne and Left Leaning: Exploring the Link Between Layne's Popularity and Democratic Presidential Votes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes with an abstract of In this delightfully quirky study, we delve into the curious case of the name Layne and its rather unexpected dance with democratic votes in the state of Minnesota. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we meticulously examine the correlation between the popularity of the name Layne and the electoral behavior of Minnesotans from 1976 to 2020. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9472869 with a p-value less than 0.01, demonstrating a robust statistical relationship that is sure to send a ripple of amusement through the academic community. Strap on your seatbelts, as we embark on this joyous rollercoaster ride of demography and democratic leanings!

ChatGPT:

Layne popularity, Layne name, democratic votes, Minnesota, correlation, US Social Security Administration, MIT Election Data, Harvard Dataverse, Minnesota electoral behavior, demographic study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Layne
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Layne
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Layne

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in Minnesota
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota

Correlation r = 0.9472869 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8973525 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Layne) over the 12 years from 1976 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-6. 0.0000029329250725144664000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00029% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 340,957 random variables You don't actually need 340 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197619801984198819921996200020042008201220162020
Popularity of the first name Layne (Babies born)8072112103147336308429474512413672
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota (Total votes)10704409541731036360110947010210001120380116827014450101573350154617013677001717080




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([80,72,112,103,147,336,308,429,474,512,413,672,])
array_2 = np.array([1070440,954173,1036360,1109470,1021000,1120380,1168270,1445010,1573350,1546170,1367700,1717080,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Layne"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Minnesota"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5032 · Black Variable ID: 3176 · Red Variable ID: 25994
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0