about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,036 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the second variable is Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins.  The chart goes from 1976 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people in New Hampshire showed support for the Democrat Presidential candidate, the excitement and anticipation for the party's future success grew. This surge in positive energy inexplicably manifested as a sudden urge for many to take a spontaneous trip to Las Vegas. It seems like the idea of backing a winning candidate was a huge gamble that people were willing to bet on, leading to a rise in hotel room check-ins in the entertainment capital of the world. The political heat from the primaries somehow ignited a simultaneous passion for the vibrant lights, extravagant shows, and endless buffets in Vegas, proving that when it comes to elections and vacations, anything can happen in the land of opportunity!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that captures the atmosphere of New Hampshire's Democratic voters celebrating their candidate's victory, leading to a spontaneous migration to Las Vegas. Show a bustling city scene in New Hampshire with people cheering and celebrating, seamlessly transitioning into a vibrant Las Vegas setting with dazzling lights and bustling hotel check-ins. The contrast between the New Hampshire celebration and the lively atmosphere of Las Vegas should be visually captivating and emphasize the exciting journey triggered by the unexpected surge in positive energy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Voxel art A TIME magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie High-tech
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins, in the following situation: As more people in New Hampshire showed support for the Democrat Presidential candidate, the excitement and anticipation for the party's future success grew. This surge in positive energy inexplicably manifested as a sudden urge for many to take a spontaneous trip to Las Vegas. It seems like the idea of backing a winning candidate was a huge gamble that people were willing to bet on, leading to a rise in hotel room check-ins in the entertainment capital of the world. The political heat from the primaries somehow ignited a simultaneous passion for the vibrant lights, extravagant shows, and endless buffets in Vegas, proving that when it comes to elections and vacations, anything can happen in the land of opportunity!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Hampshire, as more people voted for the Democrat Presidential candidate, the excitement grew. Inexplicably, this surge in positive energy triggered a spontaneous urge for many to head to Las Vegas. The number of hotel room check-ins in Las Vegas escalated. It seemed that the idea of backing a winning candidate sparked a gamble, leading to a rise in Las Vegas excitement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In New Hampshire, as more people voted for the Democrat Presidential candidate, the excitement grew. Inexplicably, this surge in positive energy triggered a spontaneous urge for many to head to Las Vegas. The number of hotel room check-ins in Las Vegas escalated. It seemed that the idea of backing a winning candidate sparked a gamble, leading to a rise in Las Vegas excitement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that captures the atmosphere of New Hampshire's Democratic voters celebrating their candidate's victory, leading to a spontaneous migration to Las Vegas. Show a bustling city scene in New Hampshire with people cheering and celebrating, seamlessly transitioning into a vibrant Las Vegas setting with dazzling lights and bustling hotel check-ins. The contrast between the New Hampshire celebration and the lively atmosphere of Las Vegas should be visually captivating and emphasize the exciting journey triggered by the unexpected surge in positive energy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire caused Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins

The Journal of Political Hospitality Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining of politics and tourism may seem like an unlikely pairing, reminiscent of an awkward dance between two distant cousins at a family wedding. However, as researchers, we are constantly reminded of the serendipitous and, at times, downright bizarre connections that can emerge from statistical analyses. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. As we dig into the data, we are reminded of the old adage: "What happens in Vegas may not stay in Vegas, especially when it comes to political inclinations."

Our quest for understanding begins with an examination of the datasets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. Armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity, we delve into the depths of this seemingly incongruous pairing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 that surfaced from our analysis left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show - a striking indicator of a strong link between the political leanings of New Hampshire voters and the frequency of hotel room check-ins in the bustling city of Las Vegas.

While this unexpected correlation initially had us scratching our heads like perplexed tourists navigating the Las Vegas strip, we soon endeavored to uncover potential explanations for this unlikely kinship. Trade winds of speculation swirled, leading us to ponder the influence of shared demographic characteristics, the impact of media coverage on voter behavior, or perhaps even the echo of a mysterious, statistically significant Las Vegas luck charm.

As we present our findings, we hope to impart a sense of lightheartedness and wonderment about the unpredictable and at times comical intersections that arise when diverse datasets collide. Through this research, we aim to not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between presidential votes and hotel room check-ins but also to remind our colleagues that the world of statistical analysis is as rich and surprising as a well-shaken martini in a Las Vegas lounge. After all, every statistical model, like a game of chance in a casino, contains an element of uncertainty and the potential for unexpected delights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and tourism may seem like an unlikely pairing, reminiscent of an awkward dance between two distant cousins at a family wedding. However, as researchers, we are constantly reminded of the serendipitous and, at times, downright bizarre connections that can emerge from statistical analyses. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. As we dig into the data, we are reminded of the old adage: "What happens in Vegas may not stay in Vegas, especially when it comes to political inclinations."
Our quest for understanding begins with an examination of the datasets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. Armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity, we delve into the depths of this seemingly incongruous pairing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 that surfaced from our analysis left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show - a striking indicator of a strong link between the political leanings of New Hampshire voters and the frequency of hotel room check-ins in the bustling city of Las Vegas.
While this unexpected correlation initially had us scratching our heads like perplexed tourists navigating the Las Vegas strip, we soon endeavored to uncover potential explanations for this unlikely kinship. Trade winds of speculation swirled, leading us to ponder the influence of shared demographic characteristics, the impact of media coverage on voter behavior, or perhaps even the echo of a mysterious, statistically significant Las Vegas luck charm.
As we present our findings, we hope to impart a sense of lightheartedness and wonderment about the unpredictable and at times comical intersections that arise when diverse datasets collide. Through this research, we aim to not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between presidential votes and hotel room check-ins but also to remind our colleagues that the world of statistical analysis is as rich and surprising as a well-shaken martini in a Las Vegas lounge. After all, every statistical model, like a game of chance in a casino, contains an element of uncertainty and the potential for unexpected delights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "A Study of Political Behavior in New England," Smith and Doe explore the voting patterns in New Hampshire, shedding light on the state's political landscape and its implications for national elections. Meanwhile, Jones delves into the dynamics of tourism and hotel occupancy in "Tourism Trends in Metropolitan Areas," providing valuable insights into the fluctuations of Las Vegas hotel room check-ins.

Adding to the scholarly discourse, "Vegas, Baby, Vegas: Exploring the Entertainment Capital of the World" offers a comprehensive exploration of the cultural and economic forces shaping Las Vegas, while "Presidential Politics: A Comprehensive Analysis" provides a meticulous examination of voting trends across different states.

Turning to fictional works, "Fear and Voting in Las Vegas" presents a satirical take on the intersection of politics and the vibrant, bustling world of Las Vegas, while "Campaign Trail Tales" weaves a comedic narrative of the frenzied world of presidential elections.

In the realm of popular culture, the animated series "Rock the Vote: Adventures in Democracy" and "The Magical Election: Enchanting Political Encounters" serve as whimsical reminders of the influence of media and storytelling on political engagement, akin to a lively parade down the Las Vegas Strip.

As we navigate through the humorous juxtaposition of scholarly inquiries and playful cultural references, we are reminded of the colorful tapestry of human behavior and the quirky correlations that can emerge from data analysis. Just as a bright neon sign draws in tourists at night, our study beckons readers to explore the unexpected connections that emerge when delving into the world of statistical relationships. So, grab your tickets and place your bets, for the carnival of correlations and the merry-go-round of statistical surprises await!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY . You used data from 1976 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and tourism may seem like an unlikely pairing, reminiscent of an awkward dance between two distant cousins at a family wedding. However, as researchers, we are constantly reminded of the serendipitous and, at times, downright bizarre connections that can emerge from statistical analyses. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. As we dig into the data, we are reminded of the old adage: "What happens in Vegas may not stay in Vegas, especially when it comes to political inclinations."
Our quest for understanding begins with an examination of the datasets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. Armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity, we delve into the depths of this seemingly incongruous pairing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 that surfaced from our analysis left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show - a striking indicator of a strong link between the political leanings of New Hampshire voters and the frequency of hotel room check-ins in the bustling city of Las Vegas.
While this unexpected correlation initially had us scratching our heads like perplexed tourists navigating the Las Vegas strip, we soon endeavored to uncover potential explanations for this unlikely kinship. Trade winds of speculation swirled, leading us to ponder the influence of shared demographic characteristics, the impact of media coverage on voter behavior, or perhaps even the echo of a mysterious, statistically significant Las Vegas luck charm.
As we present our findings, we hope to impart a sense of lightheartedness and wonderment about the unpredictable and at times comical intersections that arise when diverse datasets collide. Through this research, we aim to not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between presidential votes and hotel room check-ins but also to remind our colleagues that the world of statistical analysis is as rich and surprising as a well-shaken martini in a Las Vegas lounge. After all, every statistical model, like a game of chance in a casino, contains an element of uncertainty and the potential for unexpected delights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To wrangle the intertwining web of relationships between the Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins, we embarked on a methodological journey as intricate as a magician's sleight of hand. The study spanned the years 1976 to 2013, capturing a wide swath of political and tourism trends over four decades.

The data for Presidential votes in New Hampshire was obtained from the esteemed MIT Election Data and Science Lab. This data, reminiscent of a treasure trove that could make a pirate envious, provided us with a comprehensive record of the voting preferences of New Hampshire residents over the years. Meanwhile, the number of Las Vegas hotel room check-ins, a record akin to a bustling beehive of activity, was sourced from the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. We combed through this data with the fervor of a detective piecing together clues at a crime scene, aiming to capture the ebb and flow of tourists descending upon the iconic city of lights.

The statistical analysis, a journey akin to navigating a labyrinthine casino floor, commenced with the calculation of the correlation coefficient between the two variables. Our trusty statistical software, a formidable Swiss army knife of data analysis, revealed a striking coefficient of 0.9656317. To delve deeper into the heart of this relationship, we also conducted a hypothesis test, which bestowed upon us a p-value less than 0.01. This, in turn, confirmed the statistical significance of the observed correlation - a discovery that sent ripples of astonishment through our research team like a magician revealing the final act of a spellbinding illusion.

We applied a combination of sophisticated regression models, time series analysis, and various statistical tests, our tools akin to a magician's bag of tricks, to tease apart the potential mechanisms driving this unexpected correlation. Our analyses involved skillfully manipulating an array of covariates and control variables, akin to a high-stakes poker game where the cards were statistical indicators and the stakes were our understanding of this peculiar relationship.

Moreover, we took care to address potential confounding variables - those mischievous little imps that can wreak havoc on any statistical study. Through the robustness checks, we sought to ensure that our findings were as sturdy as a well-built dam holding back the flood of uncertainty that can often besiege statistical analyses.

In summary, our methodological approach danced through the swirling data streams with the finesse of a ballroom dancer, seeking to unravel the enigmatic connection between presidential votes in New Hampshire and hotel room check-ins in Las Vegas. This rigorous approach, spiced with a pinch of wit and wonder, allowed us to cast a spotlight on this whimsical alliance and paved the way for a deeper understanding of the unexpected and amusing unions that statistical analyses can unveil. And now, dear reader, as we lay bare the findings of our investigation, we invite you to join us in this merry dance of statistical discovery, where surprises abound and the unexpected thrives.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY .

For the time period 1976 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.9656317, r-squared of 0.9324446, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining of politics and tourism may seem like an unlikely pairing, reminiscent of an awkward dance between two distant cousins at a family wedding. However, as researchers, we are constantly reminded of the serendipitous and, at times, downright bizarre connections that can emerge from statistical analyses. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. As we dig into the data, we are reminded of the old adage: "What happens in Vegas may not stay in Vegas, especially when it comes to political inclinations."
Our quest for understanding begins with an examination of the datasets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. Armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity, we delve into the depths of this seemingly incongruous pairing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 that surfaced from our analysis left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show - a striking indicator of a strong link between the political leanings of New Hampshire voters and the frequency of hotel room check-ins in the bustling city of Las Vegas.
While this unexpected correlation initially had us scratching our heads like perplexed tourists navigating the Las Vegas strip, we soon endeavored to uncover potential explanations for this unlikely kinship. Trade winds of speculation swirled, leading us to ponder the influence of shared demographic characteristics, the impact of media coverage on voter behavior, or perhaps even the echo of a mysterious, statistically significant Las Vegas luck charm.
As we present our findings, we hope to impart a sense of lightheartedness and wonderment about the unpredictable and at times comical intersections that arise when diverse datasets collide. Through this research, we aim to not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between presidential votes and hotel room check-ins but also to remind our colleagues that the world of statistical analysis is as rich and surprising as a well-shaken martini in a Las Vegas lounge. After all, every statistical model, like a game of chance in a casino, contains an element of uncertainty and the potential for unexpected delights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins yielded some eye-opening results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. If this correlation were a street magician, it would have left us speechless with its surprising trickery.

The high correlation coefficient with an r-squared value of 0.9324446 reaffirmed the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these variables were engaged in a synchronized dance routine, seamlessly moving in tandem without missing a beat. The significance level of p < 0.01 further accentuated the strength of this association, akin to a bright neon sign on the Las Vegas strip vying for attention.

As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a compelling linear relationship between the number of Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. The points on the plot appear to align as harmoniously as synchronized swimmers in a water ballet, further highlighting the coherence between these two distinct yet interconnected phenomena.

The striking nature of this correlation piqued our interest, prompting us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms responsible for this intriguing connection. Whether it be the influence of shared demographics, the impact of media coverage, or perhaps an elusive influence akin to a hidden poker face, the cross-pollination of political and leisure activities seems to have unveiled an unexpected common thread.

In conclusion, the findings of this study underscore the quirky and unpredictably intricate nature of statistical relationships. The eyebrow-raising correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins serves as a playful reminder of the whimsical and fascinating intersections that statistical analysis can uncover. As researchers, we are reminded that even in the world of empirical investigation, there is room for surprises, laughter, and the occasional statistical sleight of hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "A Study of Political Behavior in New England," Smith and Doe explore the voting patterns in New Hampshire, shedding light on the state's political landscape and its implications for national elections. Meanwhile, Jones delves into the dynamics of tourism and hotel occupancy in "Tourism Trends in Metropolitan Areas," providing valuable insights into the fluctuations of Las Vegas hotel room check-ins.
Adding to the scholarly discourse, "Vegas, Baby, Vegas: Exploring the Entertainment Capital of the World" offers a comprehensive exploration of the cultural and economic forces shaping Las Vegas, while "Presidential Politics: A Comprehensive Analysis" provides a meticulous examination of voting trends across different states.
Turning to fictional works, "Fear and Voting in Las Vegas" presents a satirical take on the intersection of politics and the vibrant, bustling world of Las Vegas, while "Campaign Trail Tales" weaves a comedic narrative of the frenzied world of presidential elections.
In the realm of popular culture, the animated series "Rock the Vote: Adventures in Democracy" and "The Magical Election: Enchanting Political Encounters" serve as whimsical reminders of the influence of media and storytelling on political engagement, akin to a lively parade down the Las Vegas Strip.
As we navigate through the humorous juxtaposition of scholarly inquiries and playful cultural references, we are reminded of the colorful tapestry of human behavior and the quirky correlations that can emerge from data analysis. Just as a bright neon sign draws in tourists at night, our study beckons readers to explore the unexpected connections that emerge when delving into the world of statistical relationships. So, grab your tickets and place your bets, for the carnival of correlations and the merry-go-round of statistical surprises await!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins yielded some eye-opening results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. If this correlation were a street magician, it would have left us speechless with its surprising trickery.
The high correlation coefficient with an r-squared value of 0.9324446 reaffirmed the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these variables were engaged in a synchronized dance routine, seamlessly moving in tandem without missing a beat. The significance level of p < 0.01 further accentuated the strength of this association, akin to a bright neon sign on the Las Vegas strip vying for attention.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a compelling linear relationship between the number of Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. The points on the plot appear to align as harmoniously as synchronized swimmers in a water ballet, further highlighting the coherence between these two distinct yet interconnected phenomena.
The striking nature of this correlation piqued our interest, prompting us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms responsible for this intriguing connection. Whether it be the influence of shared demographics, the impact of media coverage, or perhaps an elusive influence akin to a hidden poker face, the cross-pollination of political and leisure activities seems to have unveiled an unexpected common thread.
In conclusion, the findings of this study underscore the quirky and unpredictably intricate nature of statistical relationships. The eyebrow-raising correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins serves as a playful reminder of the whimsical and fascinating intersections that statistical analysis can uncover. As researchers, we are reminded that even in the world of empirical investigation, there is room for surprises, laughter, and the occasional statistical sleight of hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study uncovered a striking relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins, raising eyebrows and prompting more questions than a curious cat in a labyrinth of statistical findings. Our findings confirm the robust correlation identified in the literature, demonstrating a synchronicity reminiscent of a flashy Las Vegas performance, leaving us wondering if statistical relationships have a penchant for showmanship.

The high correlation coefficient, akin to a high-stakes poker hand, suggests a strong and unexpected interplay between these variables, offering a peculiar glimpse into the interconnected web of human behavior and preferences. This alignment between political leanings in New Hampshire and the allure of Las Vegas beckons forth speculation on shared demographic attributes or perhaps a subtle undercurrent of influence akin to a magician's invisible thread.

The resonance between these seemingly disparate phenomena elicits amusement and calls to mind the whimsical play of chance akin to a roll of the dice at a bustling casino table. While we take these findings with the intended academic seriousness, we also revel in the delightful surprise of uncovering such an unexpected correlation, reminiscent of finding a hidden Easter egg in a labyrinth of data.

In line with the literature review, our results affirm the unanticipated connections that emerge when juxtaposing political behaviors and leisure activities, akin to a ballroom dance of data points twirling gracefully across a scatterplot. The quirky and captivating nature of this association serves as a gentle reminder that statistical relationships, not unlike a colorful carnival ride, can spin us around with unexpected turns and surprising connections.

We acknowledge the need for further research to fully comprehend the intricacies of this relationship, as if we were explorers setting sail on a voyage to uncover the secrets of this statistical archipelago. As we reflect on the playful juxtaposition of independent variables, we embrace the delightful surprises that statistical analysis can unveil, embracing the humor and wonder that emerge from the rich tapestry of human behavior and statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.

We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining of politics and tourism may seem like an unlikely pairing, reminiscent of an awkward dance between two distant cousins at a family wedding. However, as researchers, we are constantly reminded of the serendipitous and, at times, downright bizarre connections that can emerge from statistical analyses. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. As we dig into the data, we are reminded of the old adage: "What happens in Vegas may not stay in Vegas, especially when it comes to political inclinations."
Our quest for understanding begins with an examination of the datasets sourced from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, and the Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY. Armed with statistical tools and an insatiable curiosity, we delve into the depths of this seemingly incongruous pairing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 that surfaced from our analysis left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show - a striking indicator of a strong link between the political leanings of New Hampshire voters and the frequency of hotel room check-ins in the bustling city of Las Vegas.
While this unexpected correlation initially had us scratching our heads like perplexed tourists navigating the Las Vegas strip, we soon endeavored to uncover potential explanations for this unlikely kinship. Trade winds of speculation swirled, leading us to ponder the influence of shared demographic characteristics, the impact of media coverage on voter behavior, or perhaps even the echo of a mysterious, statistically significant Las Vegas luck charm.
As we present our findings, we hope to impart a sense of lightheartedness and wonderment about the unpredictable and at times comical intersections that arise when diverse datasets collide. Through this research, we aim to not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between presidential votes and hotel room check-ins but also to remind our colleagues that the world of statistical analysis is as rich and surprising as a well-shaken martini in a Las Vegas lounge. After all, every statistical model, like a game of chance in a casino, contains an element of uncertainty and the potential for unexpected delights.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins yielded some eye-opening results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 indicated a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. If this correlation were a street magician, it would have left us speechless with its surprising trickery.
The high correlation coefficient with an r-squared value of 0.9324446 reaffirmed the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these variables were engaged in a synchronized dance routine, seamlessly moving in tandem without missing a beat. The significance level of p < 0.01 further accentuated the strength of this association, akin to a bright neon sign on the Las Vegas strip vying for attention.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the scatterplot depicts a compelling linear relationship between the number of Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. The points on the plot appear to align as harmoniously as synchronized swimmers in a water ballet, further highlighting the coherence between these two distinct yet interconnected phenomena.
The striking nature of this correlation piqued our interest, prompting us to ponder the potential underlying mechanisms responsible for this intriguing connection. Whether it be the influence of shared demographics, the impact of media coverage, or perhaps an elusive influence akin to a hidden poker face, the cross-pollination of political and leisure activities seems to have unveiled an unexpected common thread.
In conclusion, the findings of this study underscore the quirky and unpredictably intricate nature of statistical relationships. The eyebrow-raising correlation between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins serves as a playful reminder of the whimsical and fascinating intersections that statistical analysis can uncover. As researchers, we are reminded that even in the world of empirical investigation, there is room for surprises, laughter, and the occasional statistical sleight of hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the spirit of empirical inquiry, our study has illuminated a remarkable relationship between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. The statistically robust correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and r-squared value of 0.9324446 have left us as pleasantly surprised as a magician's audience at a Las Vegas show – a testament to the enchanting dance of statistical analysis. The significance level of p < 0.01 further emphasized the strength of this unexpected connection, reminiscent of a bright neon sign beckoning us for attention on the Las Vegas strip.

Our findings serve as a delightful showcase of statistical unity, akin to the harmonious blend of flavors in a perfectly mixed cocktail. The scatterplot, akin to visual poetry, depicts a compelling linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, unfolding as seamlessly as a magic act on the Vegas stage.

While our study has shed light on this amusing correlation, we must acknowledge the need for further exploration. However, any additional research in this area may have us wandering the labyrinthine corridors of statistics akin to bemused tourists navigating the convoluted layout of a Las Vegas hotel. Therefore, in the spirit of embracing the unexpected, we assert that no further investigation is needed in this area. After all, in the whimsical world of statistical analysis, some connections are best left to sparkle like hidden gems in the desert of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Political Hospitality Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Research on Election Tourism


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Checking In on Votes: A Correlational Analysis of Democrat Presidential Votes in New Hampshire and Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the curious connection between Votes for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire and the Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins. Utilizing data from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse and Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, we delve into the statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9656317 and p < 0.01 for the years 1976 to 2013. This suggests a surprisingly strong association between the political preferences of New Hampshire voters and the influx of visitors checking into Las Vegas hotels.
We offer potential explanations for this unexpected correlation, including the possibility of shared demographic characteristics or the influence of media coverage on voter behavior. However, we also acknowledge the need for further investigation to truly grasp the underlying factors at play. Our study serves as a lighthearted reminder of the sometimes unpredictable and amusing connections that can emerge when analyzing diverse datasets.

ChatGPT:

democrat presidential votes, New Hampshire, Las Vegas, hotel room check-ins, correlation analysis, statistical relationship, MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY, correlation coefficient, voter behavior, media coverage, demographic characteristics, political preferences, Las Vegas hotels, statistical analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Democrat Presidential candidate in New Hampshire
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire

Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins
Source: Las Vegas CONVENTION AND VISITORS AUTHORITY
See what else correlates with Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins

Correlation r = 0.9656317 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9324446 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire) over the 10 years from 1976 through 2013.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.9E-6. 0.0000058557644339347466000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00059% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 170,772 random variables You don't actually need 170 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976198019841988199219962000200420082012
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire (Total votes)147645108864120347163696209040246166266348340511384826369561
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins (Rooms)362454581554129613947652399072124270131503140529150481




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([147645,108864,120347,163696,209040,246166,266348,340511,384826,369561,])
array_2 = np.array([36245,45815,54129,61394,76523,99072,124270,131503,140529,150481,])
array_1_name = "Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 5036 · Black Variable ID: 26006 · Red Variable ID: 499
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0