about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,321 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and the second variable is The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of individuals wielding advanced knowledge in bureaucratic jargon and red tape management swells, so does the appreciation for the intricacies of each click and thumbs-up on the internet, leading to a quantum shift in the collective cognitive likability matrix. In simpler terms, mastering the art of public administration somehow makes us all enjoy educational YouTube content just a little bit more. It's like these graduates are administrating a like-boosting campaign, but for our brains!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 in the style of a TIME magazine cover: Generate an image that visually represents the intricate fusion of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation. Depict a busy government office setting with a group of individuals proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Public Administration. The atmosphere should be one of engaged discussion and thoughtful reflection on bureaucratic strategies and intricacies. Meanwhile, in the corner of the room, there should be a large screen showing the latest SmarterEveryDay YouTube video, with a constantly updating counter of likes to reflect the growing appreciation for the educational content. The juxtaposition of these two scenes should visually convey the merging of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation. Keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Cute 2D animation Concept art Pop art High-tech
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, in the following situation: As the number of individuals wielding advanced knowledge in bureaucratic jargon and red tape management swells, so does the appreciation for the intricacies of each click and thumbs-up on the internet, leading to a quantum shift in the collective cognitive likability matrix. In simpler terms, mastering the art of public administration somehow makes us all enjoy educational YouTube content just a little bit more. It's like these graduates are administrating a like-boosting campaign, but for our brains!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling government office, a group of individuals proudly display their Master's degrees in Public Administration, discussing bureaucratic strategies and intricacies. At the same time, a large screen in the corner of the room shows the latest SmarterEveryDay YouTube video, with a constantly updating counter of likes to reflect the growing appreciation for the educational content. The juxtaposition of the two scenes visually represents the merging of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling government office, a group of individuals proudly display their Master's degrees in Public Administration, discussing bureaucratic strategies and intricacies. At the same time, a large screen in the corner of the room shows the latest SmarterEveryDay YouTube video, with a constantly updating counter of likes to reflect the growing appreciation for the educational content. The juxtaposition of the two scenes visually represents the merging of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure, here's an image generation prompt for DALL·E-3 in the style of a TIME magazine cover: Generate an image that visually represents the intricate fusion of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation. Depict a busy government office setting with a group of individuals proudly displaying their Master's degrees in Public Administration. The atmosphere should be one of engaged discussion and thoughtful reflection on bureaucratic strategies and intricacies. Meanwhile, in the corner of the room, there should be a large screen showing the latest SmarterEveryDay YouTube video, with a constantly updating counter of likes to reflect the growing appreciation for the educational content. The juxtaposition of these two scenes should visually convey the merging of administrative knowledge and digital appreciation. Keep the visual depiction simple, without any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Master's degrees awarded in Public administration caused The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay

The Journal of Public Administration and Digital Engagement

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of academia and the digital world has long been an area of intrigue, often prompting scholars to delve into the depths of seemingly incongruous connections. In this study, we set out to explore the unexpected relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's enlightening videos on YouTube. While at first glance, these two entities may appear as far apart as a politician at a tech convention, our analysis has unearthed a correlation that has left us as surprised as a student discovering that an elective class actually counts towards their degree.

Notions of public administration and the captivating educational content from a YouTube channel like SmarterEveryDay may not seem to align naturally. One wonders if the fascination with administrative processes imbues viewers with an enhanced ability to appreciate the marvels of physics and engineering or if there is a secret society of public administration enthusiasts who also happen to be keen supporters of slow-motion footage of objects smashing into other objects.

Nevertheless, armed with a hefty dose of curiosity and a plethora of statistical analysis tools, we embarked on this investigation. Our aim was not only to uncover the connection between these seemingly disparate entities but also to contribute to the broader discourse on the tangential tangents that learning and digital engagement can take. And here we present our findings, daring to suggest that perhaps an understanding of public administration might just lead to a proclivity for smashing that Like button on YouTube.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and the digital world has long been an area of intrigue, often prompting scholars to delve into the depths of seemingly incongruous connections. In this study, we set out to explore the unexpected relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's enlightening videos on YouTube. While at first glance, these two entities may appear as far apart as a politician at a tech convention, our analysis has unearthed a correlation that has left us as surprised as a student discovering that an elective class actually counts towards their degree.
Notions of public administration and the captivating educational content from a YouTube channel like SmarterEveryDay may not seem to align naturally. One wonders if the fascination with administrative processes imbues viewers with an enhanced ability to appreciate the marvels of physics and engineering or if there is a secret society of public administration enthusiasts who also happen to be keen supporters of slow-motion footage of objects smashing into other objects.
Nevertheless, armed with a hefty dose of curiosity and a plethora of statistical analysis tools, we embarked on this investigation. Our aim was not only to uncover the connection between these seemingly disparate entities but also to contribute to the broader discourse on the tangential tangents that learning and digital engagement can take. And here we present our findings, daring to suggest that perhaps an understanding of public administration might just lead to a proclivity for smashing that Like button on YouTube.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has explored the correlation between educational attainment and social media engagement, providing valuable insights into the curious interplay between academia and digital platforms. Smith (2015) demonstrated a positive association between higher education levels and a propensity for online engagement, noting that individuals with advanced degrees were more likely to participate in online communities and engage with educational content. Similarly, Doe (2018) examined the impact of specialized postgraduate programs on social media interactions, revealing a noticeable uptick in engagement among individuals studying niche subjects.

In the realm of public administration, Jones (2020) delved into the factors influencing career choices among graduates, offering compelling perspectives on the potential effects of educational pursuits in this field. The study highlighted the multifaceted nature of public administration education and its impact on individuals' professional trajectories. These findings, while shedding light on the nuances of educational choices, also hint at the broader implications of academic pursuits on societal engagement.

Turning to a broader scope of literature, "Public Administration: Concepts and Cases" (Goodnow, 2017) provided a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of public administration, intertwining theoretical frameworks with real-world applications. This seminal work laid the foundation for understanding the complexities of public administration education and its potential influence on individuals' perceptions of governance and societal systems. In a similar vein, "Administrative Behavior" (Simon, 1947) explored the behavioral aspects of administrative decision-making, delving into the cognitive processes that underpin administrative practices and their implications for the broader socio-political landscape.

On a more whimsical note, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (Adams, 1979) and "Ender's Game" (Card, 1985) offered fictional perspectives on the interplay between knowledge acquisition and unanticipated consequences, albeit in the realm of intergalactic adventures and strategic warfare. While seemingly unrelated to the scholarly pursuits of public administration, these works serve as a reminder of the unexpected paths that curiosity and learning can traverse, often leading to remarkably unforeseen destinations.

Board games such as "Pandemic" and "The Resistance" also present intriguing parallels to the interconnected nature of administrative decision-making and digital engagement. The strategic dynamics and collaborative elements within these games mirror the complexities of governance and decision-making processes, albeit in a more playful context. While not directly related to the specific focus of this study, these cultural references serve to underscore the multifaceted nature of interactive dynamics and decision-making, offering a playful nod to the complex web of influences at play in our interconnected world.

As we venture into the unexplored terrain at the confluence of public administration education and digital engagement, it is imperative to heed the diverse array of literature and cultural touchstones that inform our understanding of this unconventional relationship. With these diverse perspectives in mind, we embark on our analysis, recognizing the eclectic tapestry of influences that shape our perceptions of academic pursuits and their manifestations in the ever-evolving digital landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and the digital world has long been an area of intrigue, often prompting scholars to delve into the depths of seemingly incongruous connections. In this study, we set out to explore the unexpected relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's enlightening videos on YouTube. While at first glance, these two entities may appear as far apart as a politician at a tech convention, our analysis has unearthed a correlation that has left us as surprised as a student discovering that an elective class actually counts towards their degree.
Notions of public administration and the captivating educational content from a YouTube channel like SmarterEveryDay may not seem to align naturally. One wonders if the fascination with administrative processes imbues viewers with an enhanced ability to appreciate the marvels of physics and engineering or if there is a secret society of public administration enthusiasts who also happen to be keen supporters of slow-motion footage of objects smashing into other objects.
Nevertheless, armed with a hefty dose of curiosity and a plethora of statistical analysis tools, we embarked on this investigation. Our aim was not only to uncover the connection between these seemingly disparate entities but also to contribute to the broader discourse on the tangential tangents that learning and digital engagement can take. And here we present our findings, daring to suggest that perhaps an understanding of public administration might just lead to a proclivity for smashing that Like button on YouTube.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysteries of this seemingly bizarre correlation between Master's degrees in Public Administration and YouTube likes on the captivating channel SmarterEveryDay, we devised an analytical approach as convoluted as a complex bureaucratic procedure. Our data collection methods were as diverse as a panel discussion on political ideologies, drawing primarily from the National Center for Education Statistics for information on Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration from 2012 to 2021. We then ventured into the digital wilderness, relying on the expansive universe of YouTube to collect the average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay's videos, with the precision of a scientist measuring the velocity of a rocket launch.

Once the data was corralled, we subjected it to rigorous statistical analysis, wielding tools such as Pearson's correlation coefficient, regression analysis, and the formidable p-value calculation. Our statistical arsenal was as formidable as a political debate, ensuring that our findings stood on firm ground and weren't merely a flight of fancy.

Additionally, we navigated the treacherous terrain of data cleaning and processing, ensuring that our dataset was as pristine as an exemplary administrative policy. The aim was to remove noise and anomalies while maintaining the integrity of the information gathered. Our steadfast dedication to data quality was as unwavering as a public official's commitment to uphold the constitution.

Furthermore, we incorporated a time series analysis to discern any temporal patterns in both the awarding of Master's degrees in Public Administration and the ebb and flow of YouTube likes. This meticulous approach allowed us to capture the dynamic nature of the relationship between academia and digital engagement, much like capturing the essence of a live-streamed event.

In order to validate our findings and quell any doubts about spurious correlations, we conducted robustness checks using alternative statistical models and sub-sample analyses. This scrutiny was akin to subjecting a contentious policy proposal to multiple rounds of intense scrutiny before it could gain approval.

Unquestionably, our methodology was not without its challenges, much like navigating the labyrinthine corridors of bureaucratic paperwork. However, our unflagging determination and commitment to unveiling the unexpected connection between public administration mastery and digital appreciation saw us through these trials.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9736848, r-squared of 0.9480620, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of academia and the digital world has long been an area of intrigue, often prompting scholars to delve into the depths of seemingly incongruous connections. In this study, we set out to explore the unexpected relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's enlightening videos on YouTube. While at first glance, these two entities may appear as far apart as a politician at a tech convention, our analysis has unearthed a correlation that has left us as surprised as a student discovering that an elective class actually counts towards their degree.
Notions of public administration and the captivating educational content from a YouTube channel like SmarterEveryDay may not seem to align naturally. One wonders if the fascination with administrative processes imbues viewers with an enhanced ability to appreciate the marvels of physics and engineering or if there is a secret society of public administration enthusiasts who also happen to be keen supporters of slow-motion footage of objects smashing into other objects.
Nevertheless, armed with a hefty dose of curiosity and a plethora of statistical analysis tools, we embarked on this investigation. Our aim was not only to uncover the connection between these seemingly disparate entities but also to contribute to the broader discourse on the tangential tangents that learning and digital engagement can take. And here we present our findings, daring to suggest that perhaps an understanding of public administration might just lead to a proclivity for smashing that Like button on YouTube.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9736848, a robust r-squared value of 0.9480620, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These striking statistical measures signify a compelling and robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated realms. We were as stunned as a scientist who accidentally discovers a new species of tardigrade in their lab.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables (Fig. 1). The plot offers a visual representation of our findings, compelling enough to nudge even the most skeptical viewer to consider the unexpected nexus between academic pursuits and digital engagement.

Our results suggest a connection that goes beyond the conventional boundaries of academia and digital media. The implications of this association extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of public administration and YouTube likes; they beckon us to ponder whether a deep understanding of administrative intricacies might actually inspire viewers to engage more actively with educational media. It's almost as if pursuing a public administration degree could equip one with an increased capacity to appreciate the finer details of physics demonstrations or engineering marvels, or perhaps just foster a deeper appreciation for the art of smashing that Like button.

This unanticipated correlation stands as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research, where the seemingly improbable often unveils the most intriguing connections. Our findings serve as a call for further exploration into the uncharted and unanticipated links between traditionally separate domains, beckoning researchers and academics to embrace the unexpected with the same enthusiasm as stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has explored the correlation between educational attainment and social media engagement, providing valuable insights into the curious interplay between academia and digital platforms. Smith (2015) demonstrated a positive association between higher education levels and a propensity for online engagement, noting that individuals with advanced degrees were more likely to participate in online communities and engage with educational content. Similarly, Doe (2018) examined the impact of specialized postgraduate programs on social media interactions, revealing a noticeable uptick in engagement among individuals studying niche subjects.
In the realm of public administration, Jones (2020) delved into the factors influencing career choices among graduates, offering compelling perspectives on the potential effects of educational pursuits in this field. The study highlighted the multifaceted nature of public administration education and its impact on individuals' professional trajectories. These findings, while shedding light on the nuances of educational choices, also hint at the broader implications of academic pursuits on societal engagement.
Turning to a broader scope of literature, "Public Administration: Concepts and Cases" (Goodnow, 2017) provided a comprehensive overview of the intricacies of public administration, intertwining theoretical frameworks with real-world applications. This seminal work laid the foundation for understanding the complexities of public administration education and its potential influence on individuals' perceptions of governance and societal systems. In a similar vein, "Administrative Behavior" (Simon, 1947) explored the behavioral aspects of administrative decision-making, delving into the cognitive processes that underpin administrative practices and their implications for the broader socio-political landscape.
On a more whimsical note, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (Adams, 1979) and "Ender's Game" (Card, 1985) offered fictional perspectives on the interplay between knowledge acquisition and unanticipated consequences, albeit in the realm of intergalactic adventures and strategic warfare. While seemingly unrelated to the scholarly pursuits of public administration, these works serve as a reminder of the unexpected paths that curiosity and learning can traverse, often leading to remarkably unforeseen destinations.
Board games such as "Pandemic" and "The Resistance" also present intriguing parallels to the interconnected nature of administrative decision-making and digital engagement. The strategic dynamics and collaborative elements within these games mirror the complexities of governance and decision-making processes, albeit in a more playful context. While not directly related to the specific focus of this study, these cultural references serve to underscore the multifaceted nature of interactive dynamics and decision-making, offering a playful nod to the complex web of influences at play in our interconnected world.
As we venture into the unexplored terrain at the confluence of public administration education and digital engagement, it is imperative to heed the diverse array of literature and cultural touchstones that inform our understanding of this unconventional relationship. With these diverse perspectives in mind, we embark on our analysis, recognizing the eclectic tapestry of influences that shape our perceptions of academic pursuits and their manifestations in the ever-evolving digital landscape.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9736848, a robust r-squared value of 0.9480620, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These striking statistical measures signify a compelling and robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated realms. We were as stunned as a scientist who accidentally discovers a new species of tardigrade in their lab.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables (Fig. 1). The plot offers a visual representation of our findings, compelling enough to nudge even the most skeptical viewer to consider the unexpected nexus between academic pursuits and digital engagement.
Our results suggest a connection that goes beyond the conventional boundaries of academia and digital media. The implications of this association extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of public administration and YouTube likes; they beckon us to ponder whether a deep understanding of administrative intricacies might actually inspire viewers to engage more actively with educational media. It's almost as if pursuing a public administration degree could equip one with an increased capacity to appreciate the finer details of physics demonstrations or engineering marvels, or perhaps just foster a deeper appreciation for the art of smashing that Like button.
This unanticipated correlation stands as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research, where the seemingly improbable often unveils the most intriguing connections. Our findings serve as a call for further exploration into the uncharted and unanticipated links between traditionally separate domains, beckoning researchers and academics to embrace the unexpected with the same enthusiasm as stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered in our analysis provides empirical support for the hitherto uncharted territory of the intersection between public administration education and digital engagement. Our findings align with the prior research that highlighted the influence of advanced education and niche programs on individuals' online interactions. Moreover, the study by Jones (2020) on career choices among graduates in public administration serves as an important foundation for understanding the multifaceted impact of academic pursuits in this field. Our results build upon these insights, revealing a tangible association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos, akin to the seamless coordination of a symphony orchestra, where the individual instruments harmoniously come together to produce a captivating composition.

Delving deeper into the literature, the work of Smith (2015) sheds light on the propensity for online engagement among individuals with higher education levels, aligning with the socio-digital implications of our study. The insights from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (Adams, 1979) and "Ender's Game" (Card, 1985) continue to resonate, offering a contemplative perspective on the unpredictability of educational pursuits and their unforeseen consequences. This adds a touch of poetic irony, akin to finding a rare gem in an unexpected place, reminding us of the enigmatic pathways that knowledge can traverse, much like discovering a hidden Easter egg in a video game.

Our research, akin to uncovering buried treasure at the confluence of academia and the digital realm, sheds light on the nuanced relationship between public administration education and online engagement. The unexpected nexus unearthed in our study serves as a poignant reminder of the whimsical, interconnected nature of human endeavors, much like stumbling upon a surprise gift on an ordinary day. This serendipitous discovery prompts us to embark further into the unexplored terrain of academia and digital dynamics, where the enigmatic enigma of correlation invites us to unravel its intricacies, much like solving a captivating puzzle that leaves us on the edge of our seats.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Public administration and The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of academia and the digital world has long been an area of intrigue, often prompting scholars to delve into the depths of seemingly incongruous connections. In this study, we set out to explore the unexpected relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's enlightening videos on YouTube. While at first glance, these two entities may appear as far apart as a politician at a tech convention, our analysis has unearthed a correlation that has left us as surprised as a student discovering that an elective class actually counts towards their degree.
Notions of public administration and the captivating educational content from a YouTube channel like SmarterEveryDay may not seem to align naturally. One wonders if the fascination with administrative processes imbues viewers with an enhanced ability to appreciate the marvels of physics and engineering or if there is a secret society of public administration enthusiasts who also happen to be keen supporters of slow-motion footage of objects smashing into other objects.
Nevertheless, armed with a hefty dose of curiosity and a plethora of statistical analysis tools, we embarked on this investigation. Our aim was not only to uncover the connection between these seemingly disparate entities but also to contribute to the broader discourse on the tangential tangents that learning and digital engagement can take. And here we present our findings, daring to suggest that perhaps an understanding of public administration might just lead to a proclivity for smashing that Like button on YouTube.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos has unearthed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9736848, a robust r-squared value of 0.9480620, and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These striking statistical measures signify a compelling and robust relationship between these two seemingly unrelated realms. We were as stunned as a scientist who accidentally discovers a new species of tardigrade in their lab.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the two variables (Fig. 1). The plot offers a visual representation of our findings, compelling enough to nudge even the most skeptical viewer to consider the unexpected nexus between academic pursuits and digital engagement.
Our results suggest a connection that goes beyond the conventional boundaries of academia and digital media. The implications of this association extend beyond the mere juxtaposition of public administration and YouTube likes; they beckon us to ponder whether a deep understanding of administrative intricacies might actually inspire viewers to engage more actively with educational media. It's almost as if pursuing a public administration degree could equip one with an increased capacity to appreciate the finer details of physics demonstrations or engineering marvels, or perhaps just foster a deeper appreciation for the art of smashing that Like button.
This unanticipated correlation stands as a testament to the serendipitous nature of research, where the seemingly improbable often unveils the most intriguing connections. Our findings serve as a call for further exploration into the uncharted and unanticipated links between traditionally separate domains, beckoning researchers and academics to embrace the unexpected with the same enthusiasm as stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the surprising and statistically significant link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's educational YouTube videos. Our findings unearthed a correlation coefficient that jumps out like a bright, red button on a YouTube interface, which leaves us as astonished as a magician who has just successfully pulled off a complicated illusion.

This unexpected connection challenges traditional notions of academic pursuits and digital engagement, hinting at a potential overlap that is as enigmatic as trying to figure out the plots of Christopher Nolan films. The implications of our research beckon us to contemplate whether public administration enthusiasts are indeed avid supporters of slow-motion footage or if the allure of physics demonstrations and engineering marvels is particularly pronounced among those with a penchant for bureaucratic intricacies.

As tempting as it may be to delve further into this enthralling dichotomy, we are compelled to assert that no more research is needed in this area. As we wrap up this study, we do so with the same certainty as a cat sitting on a warm windowsill. With this, we invite future researchers to explore other curious connections, leaving them to uncover their own unexpected intersections and correlations, just as enticing as a hidden Easter egg in a video game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Public Administration and Digital Engagement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Advanced Social Media Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Mastering the Public Eye: Analyzing the Link Between Public Administration Master's Degrees and YouTube Likes on SmarterEveryDay with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious connection between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Public Administration and the average number of likes received by SmarterEveryDay's captivating educational videos on YouTube. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and YouTube, our research team conducted a thorough analysis of the period from 2012 to 2021. Indubitably, our findings have uncovered a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9736848 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a compelling relationship. The implications of these results are quite thought-provoking, possibly suggesting that an enhanced understanding of public administration may lead to an increased penchant for educational content on platforms such as YouTube. Our study sheds light on this unanticipated intersection and opens the door to further research into the curious intertwining of academia and the digital realm.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Public Administration, YouTube likes, educational videos, SmarterEveryDay, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, academia and digital realm

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Public administration
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Public administration and social services
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Public administration

The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos
Detailed data title: The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos.
Source: SmarterEveryDay on YouTube
See what else correlates with The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos

Correlation r = 0.9736848 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9480620 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Public administration) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.03E-6. 0.0000020324768666587420000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.000203% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 492,011 random variables You don't actually need 492 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Public administration (Degrees awarded)41737435914450845948467544536146300488834971849388
The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos (Average likes)17283.639800.186328.810153210286787739111799141885182028147054




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41737,43591,44508,45948,46754,45361,46300,48883,49718,49388,])
array_2 = np.array([17283.6,39800.1,86328.8,101532,102867,87739,111799,141885,182028,147054,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Public administration"
array_2_name = "The average number of likes on SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5321 · Black Variable ID: 1338 · Red Variable ID: 25491
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0