about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,372 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and the second variable is The number of computer programmers in Maryland.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved in Hagerstown, the local population found themselves spending more time outdoors. With their lungs now able to fully appreciate the fresh air, many people discovered a newfound love for outdoor activities. As a result, they decided to pursue careers that allowed them to embrace the great outdoors. This shift led to a surprising decrease in the number of computer programmers in Maryland, as former coding enthusiasts traded their desks for hiking trails and their computer screens for scenic views, ultimately coding a new, greener path for themselves.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing the transition in Hagerstown, Maryland from a tech-centric environment to a nature-loving community. Depict a serene landscape with individuals engaging in outdoor activities, such as hiking, running, and cycling, surrounded by lush greenery. Use clean lines and minimalist detailing to emphasize the shift from indoor to outdoor lifestyles, capturing the essence of the change in the local culture without the need for excessive details. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Magic realism Macabre Minimalism Whimsical illustration Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland, in the following situation: As the air quality improved in Hagerstown, the local population found themselves spending more time outdoors. With their lungs now able to fully appreciate the fresh air, many people discovered a newfound love for outdoor activities. As a result, they decided to pursue careers that allowed them to embrace the great outdoors. This shift led to a surprising decrease in the number of computer programmers in Maryland, as former coding enthusiasts traded their desks for hiking trails and their computer screens for scenic views, ultimately coding a new, greener path for themselves.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The air in Hagerstown, Maryland gradually clears, and people begin to spend more time outdoors. As they breathe in the fresh air, many discover a love for outdoor activities. They opt for careers that embrace nature, causing a decrease in the number of computer programmers in Maryland. Instead of sitting at desks, former coding enthusiasts are now found on hiking trails, coding a greener path for themselves.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: The air in Hagerstown, Maryland gradually clears, and people begin to spend more time outdoors. As they breathe in the fresh air, many discover a love for outdoor activities. They opt for careers that embrace nature, causing a decrease in the number of computer programmers in Maryland. Instead of sitting at desks, former coding enthusiasts are now found on hiking trails, coding a greener path for themselves. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing the transition in Hagerstown, Maryland from a tech-centric environment to a nature-loving community. Depict a serene landscape with individuals engaging in outdoor activities, such as hiking, running, and cycling, surrounded by lush greenery. Use clean lines and minimalist detailing to emphasize the shift from indoor to outdoor lifestyles, capturing the essence of the change in the local culture without the need for excessive details.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland caused The number of computer programmers in Maryland to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland

The Journal of Environmental Informatics and Tech Solutions

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Computer programmers are a curious bunch. They thrive in the digital jungle, navigating through lines of code, debugging errors, and occasionally muttering incantations to coax software into functioning. But what if we told you that they might also have a peculiar affinity for polluted air? Yes, you heard that right. We have embarked on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of programmers in the state. Strap in, folks, as we delve into this coding conundrum and explore the unseen forces shaping the world of programming.

The world of programming is like a labyrinth—one minute you're lost in a maze of syntax, and the next, you emerge triumphantly with a perfectly functioning algorithm. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, the demand for skilled programmers has soared to unprecedented heights. Meanwhile, Hagerstown, nestled in the idyllic mountains of Maryland, has been grappling with its own challenges, particularly in the realm of air quality. What a curious pairing, you might say. The cacophony of keystrokes echoing in programming hubs and the subtle hum of air purifiers battling the smog—could there be a connection lurking beneath the surface?

As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, it becomes apparent that our exploration is not merely about numbers and statistics. It's about deciphering the subtle dance between human endeavor and the environment, about finding the silver lining in the haze of environmental challenges. So, sit back, grab a cup of coffee (or perhaps some clean, filtered air), and join us in uncovering the unexpected interplay between pixels and pollutants. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing correlation, we might just stumble upon a revelation that leaves us breathless—both figuratively and, perhaps, due to the potential air pollution in Hagerstown.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Computer programmers are a curious bunch. They thrive in the digital jungle, navigating through lines of code, debugging errors, and occasionally muttering incantations to coax software into functioning. But what if we told you that they might also have a peculiar affinity for polluted air? Yes, you heard that right. We have embarked on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of programmers in the state. Strap in, folks, as we delve into this coding conundrum and explore the unseen forces shaping the world of programming.
The world of programming is like a labyrinth—one minute you're lost in a maze of syntax, and the next, you emerge triumphantly with a perfectly functioning algorithm. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, the demand for skilled programmers has soared to unprecedented heights. Meanwhile, Hagerstown, nestled in the idyllic mountains of Maryland, has been grappling with its own challenges, particularly in the realm of air quality. What a curious pairing, you might say. The cacophony of keystrokes echoing in programming hubs and the subtle hum of air purifiers battling the smog—could there be a connection lurking beneath the surface?
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, it becomes apparent that our exploration is not merely about numbers and statistics. It's about deciphering the subtle dance between human endeavor and the environment, about finding the silver lining in the haze of environmental challenges. So, sit back, grab a cup of coffee (or perhaps some clean, filtered air), and join us in uncovering the unexpected interplay between pixels and pollutants. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing correlation, we might just stumble upon a revelation that leaves us breathless—both figuratively and, perhaps, due to the potential air pollution in Hagerstown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In “The Air-Pollution-Programming Puzzler” by J. Smith and A. Doe, the authors find that the connection between air pollution and the proliferation of computer programmers is like debugging a particularly cryptic line of code – elusive and confounding. Delving into the depths of Hagerstown's atmospheric composition, the study uncovers surprising patterns that hint at a correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we navigate through this labyrinth of research, we unearth insights that may just shed light on a puzzle that has perplexed the coding community for years.

Furthermore, in “Programming in the Clouds: A Study of Maryland's Air Quality” by T. Jones, the authors explore the notion that programmers are not just adept at writing code but also at navigating through the metaphorical haze of air pollution. Their findings reveal a cloud of uncertainty hovering over the relationship between air quality in Hagerstown and the number of computer programmers in Maryland. The study raises thought-provoking questions about whether the presence of pollutants influences the creative cognitive processes of programmers, or if it merely serves as an atmospheric backdrop to their coding endeavors.

Transitioning from these serious scholarly pursuits, we venture into the realm of non-fiction literature that might shed some light on this unique correlation. “The Big Book of Polluted Possibilities” by E. Nigma presents a compilation of outlandish yet surprisingly relevant connections between environmental factors and unexpected outcomes. Could there be a chapter dedicated to the curious relationship between air pollution and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland? The answer might just be hidden within these polluted pages.

Additionally, the works of fiction “The Code Conundrum” by A. Hacker and “Mists of Coding Madness” by P. Airien offer captivating narratives set against the backdrop of mysterious coding enigmas and hazy atmospheric conditions. Could the tales within these books hold kernels of truth, disguised as fiction? As we unravel the intricacies of the coding conundrum, it's all hands on deck – or perhaps, all coding fingers on keyboards.

Turning our attention to unexpected inspiration, the board game “Pollution Pandemonium” simulates a world where air pollution levels impact the strategic decisions of virtual programmers. Could this fictional game inadvertently mimic real-life dynamics? And then there's “Code Quest,” a board game that challenges players to navigate through coding challenges while contending with simulated atmospheric obstacles. Could these games be more than just recreational pastimes, and possibly hold clues to the tangible correlation we seek?

As we wade through the literature, both scholarly and imaginative, we find ourselves at the crossroads of puzzlement and amusement, pondering the unexpected relationship between Hagerstown's polluted air and the state's burgeoning population of programmers. With an air of anticipation – pun intended – we proceed to unravel this intriguing connection and embark on a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Computer programmers are a curious bunch. They thrive in the digital jungle, navigating through lines of code, debugging errors, and occasionally muttering incantations to coax software into functioning. But what if we told you that they might also have a peculiar affinity for polluted air? Yes, you heard that right. We have embarked on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of programmers in the state. Strap in, folks, as we delve into this coding conundrum and explore the unseen forces shaping the world of programming.
The world of programming is like a labyrinth—one minute you're lost in a maze of syntax, and the next, you emerge triumphantly with a perfectly functioning algorithm. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, the demand for skilled programmers has soared to unprecedented heights. Meanwhile, Hagerstown, nestled in the idyllic mountains of Maryland, has been grappling with its own challenges, particularly in the realm of air quality. What a curious pairing, you might say. The cacophony of keystrokes echoing in programming hubs and the subtle hum of air purifiers battling the smog—could there be a connection lurking beneath the surface?
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, it becomes apparent that our exploration is not merely about numbers and statistics. It's about deciphering the subtle dance between human endeavor and the environment, about finding the silver lining in the haze of environmental challenges. So, sit back, grab a cup of coffee (or perhaps some clean, filtered air), and join us in uncovering the unexpected interplay between pixels and pollutants. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing correlation, we might just stumble upon a revelation that leaves us breathless—both figuratively and, perhaps, due to the potential air pollution in Hagerstown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious dance between air pollution levels in Hagerstown and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland, our research team embarked on a journey that involved a blend of sophisticated statistical analyses and a dash of unconventional data wrangling.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process resembled a treasure hunt, albeit a digital one. We scoured the vast expanse of the Internet, braving the labyrinthine corridors of databases and repositories in search of nuggets of information illuminating the realms of air quality and employment statistics. Our primary sources included the Environmental Protection Agency's databases on air quality metrics, specifically targeting Hagerstown, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ treasure trove of occupational employment data for Maryland. Throughout the treasure hunt, we gathered data spanning nearly two decades, from 2003 to 2022, ensuring that our analysis captured the ebbs and flows of both air pollution and the programming landscape.

Data Analysis:
Armed with gigabytes of data and a zealous determination akin to a knight on a quest, we employed a mix of classical statistics and modern machine learning techniques. Our trusty statistical software hummed with anticipation, ready to dissect the voluminous datasets and reveal the subtle patterns lurking within. We calculated correlation coefficients with the fervor of alchemists seeking the philosopher's stone, our eyes gleaming with anticipation of unraveling the enigma. To complement our conventional statistical arsenal, we delved into the realm of data visualization, crafting intricate plots akin to works of art, with each line and data point concealing clues about the relationship between air pollution and the coder community.

The Stuff That’s Hard to Explain:
As any dedicated academic researcher would attest, there are components of the methodology that defy easy explanation. In essence, our data manipulation involved weaving a tapestry of interconnected variables, akin to untangling a particularly gnarled string of code. We massaged the data with care, employing the digital equivalent of aromatherapy to coax intricate insights from the numbers. While this process may sound esoteric and cryptic, rest assured, it involved a judicious combination of computerized algorithms and an unwavering faith in the power of statistical inference.

A Touch of Unorthodox Elegance:
In homage to the spirit of unbounded curiosity, we injected a touch of unorthodox elegance into our methodology. Our research team engaged in whimsical brainstorming sessions, integrating quirky analogies and playful experimentation to breathe life into the otherwise austere process of data analysis. By infusing our methodology with a medley of unconventional tactics, we sought to add a dash of unpredictability to our scholarly pursuits, keeping the fire of enthusiasm ablaze amidst the sea of numbers.

In summary, our methodology harmonized the rigors of traditional statistical analyses with a pinch of whimsy and a splash of unorthodox elegance. This eclectic blend paved the path for our remarkable findings, as we navigated through the complex matrix of air pollution and the proliferation of programmers with a sense of scholarly adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8256638, r-squared of 0.6817207, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Computer programmers are a curious bunch. They thrive in the digital jungle, navigating through lines of code, debugging errors, and occasionally muttering incantations to coax software into functioning. But what if we told you that they might also have a peculiar affinity for polluted air? Yes, you heard that right. We have embarked on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of programmers in the state. Strap in, folks, as we delve into this coding conundrum and explore the unseen forces shaping the world of programming.
The world of programming is like a labyrinth—one minute you're lost in a maze of syntax, and the next, you emerge triumphantly with a perfectly functioning algorithm. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, the demand for skilled programmers has soared to unprecedented heights. Meanwhile, Hagerstown, nestled in the idyllic mountains of Maryland, has been grappling with its own challenges, particularly in the realm of air quality. What a curious pairing, you might say. The cacophony of keystrokes echoing in programming hubs and the subtle hum of air purifiers battling the smog—could there be a connection lurking beneath the surface?
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, it becomes apparent that our exploration is not merely about numbers and statistics. It's about deciphering the subtle dance between human endeavor and the environment, about finding the silver lining in the haze of environmental challenges. So, sit back, grab a cup of coffee (or perhaps some clean, filtered air), and join us in uncovering the unexpected interplay between pixels and pollutants. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing correlation, we might just stumble upon a revelation that leaves us breathless—both figuratively and, perhaps, due to the potential air pollution in Hagerstown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis conducted on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland and the number of computer programmers in Maryland revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, which indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6817207 further supports the strength of this relationship, explaining approximately 68.17% of the variance in the number of computer programmers in Maryland based on air pollution levels in Hagerstown.

Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship. This finding suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, bolstering the credibility of our results.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels in Hagerstown and the number of computer programmers in Maryland. The upward trend depicted in the scatterplot visually reinforces the positive relationship uncovered in our analysis.

These results raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of air quality on the decisions of aspiring and established programmers. While the link between air pollution in Hagerstown and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland may appear surprising at first glance, our findings provide compelling evidence supporting this connection.

Overall, the substantial correlation observed in this study compels us to reconsider the factors shaping the demographics of the programming community. This unexpected revelation adds a fresh dimension to the ongoing discourse on the environmental and occupational influences in the world of programming, demonstrating the need for further investigation into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational choices.

The statistical evidence presented in this study paints a vivid picture of the intricate ecosystem of coding amidst the ambient conditions of air pollution, leading to a breath of fresh air in understanding the dynamics of the programming landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In “The Air-Pollution-Programming Puzzler” by J. Smith and A. Doe, the authors find that the connection between air pollution and the proliferation of computer programmers is like debugging a particularly cryptic line of code – elusive and confounding. Delving into the depths of Hagerstown's atmospheric composition, the study uncovers surprising patterns that hint at a correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. As we navigate through this labyrinth of research, we unearth insights that may just shed light on a puzzle that has perplexed the coding community for years.
Furthermore, in “Programming in the Clouds: A Study of Maryland's Air Quality” by T. Jones, the authors explore the notion that programmers are not just adept at writing code but also at navigating through the metaphorical haze of air pollution. Their findings reveal a cloud of uncertainty hovering over the relationship between air quality in Hagerstown and the number of computer programmers in Maryland. The study raises thought-provoking questions about whether the presence of pollutants influences the creative cognitive processes of programmers, or if it merely serves as an atmospheric backdrop to their coding endeavors.
Transitioning from these serious scholarly pursuits, we venture into the realm of non-fiction literature that might shed some light on this unique correlation. “The Big Book of Polluted Possibilities” by E. Nigma presents a compilation of outlandish yet surprisingly relevant connections between environmental factors and unexpected outcomes. Could there be a chapter dedicated to the curious relationship between air pollution and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland? The answer might just be hidden within these polluted pages.
Additionally, the works of fiction “The Code Conundrum” by A. Hacker and “Mists of Coding Madness” by P. Airien offer captivating narratives set against the backdrop of mysterious coding enigmas and hazy atmospheric conditions. Could the tales within these books hold kernels of truth, disguised as fiction? As we unravel the intricacies of the coding conundrum, it's all hands on deck – or perhaps, all coding fingers on keyboards.
Turning our attention to unexpected inspiration, the board game “Pollution Pandemonium” simulates a world where air pollution levels impact the strategic decisions of virtual programmers. Could this fictional game inadvertently mimic real-life dynamics? And then there's “Code Quest,” a board game that challenges players to navigate through coding challenges while contending with simulated atmospheric obstacles. Could these games be more than just recreational pastimes, and possibly hold clues to the tangible correlation we seek?
As we wade through the literature, both scholarly and imaginative, we find ourselves at the crossroads of puzzlement and amusement, pondering the unexpected relationship between Hagerstown's polluted air and the state's burgeoning population of programmers. With an air of anticipation – pun intended – we proceed to unravel this intriguing connection and embark on a journey that promises to be as enlightening as it is entertaining.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland and the number of computer programmers in Maryland revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, which indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6817207 further supports the strength of this relationship, explaining approximately 68.17% of the variance in the number of computer programmers in Maryland based on air pollution levels in Hagerstown.
Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship. This finding suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, bolstering the credibility of our results.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels in Hagerstown and the number of computer programmers in Maryland. The upward trend depicted in the scatterplot visually reinforces the positive relationship uncovered in our analysis.
These results raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of air quality on the decisions of aspiring and established programmers. While the link between air pollution in Hagerstown and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland may appear surprising at first glance, our findings provide compelling evidence supporting this connection.
Overall, the substantial correlation observed in this study compels us to reconsider the factors shaping the demographics of the programming community. This unexpected revelation adds a fresh dimension to the ongoing discourse on the environmental and occupational influences in the world of programming, demonstrating the need for further investigation into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational choices.
The statistical evidence presented in this study paints a vivid picture of the intricate ecosystem of coding amidst the ambient conditions of air pollution, leading to a breath of fresh air in understanding the dynamics of the programming landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have left us in quite a state of theoretical whiplash. As we breathe in the implications of our results, the correlation we have uncovered between air pollution levels in Hagerstown and the prevalence of computer programmers in Maryland may seem just as befuddling as a convoluted piece of code.

The literature review set the stage for our exploration, steering us through the hazy clouds of potential connections. We stumbled upon "The Big Book of Polluted Possibilities" by E. Nigma, which, despite its seemingly outlandish title, provided an unexpected springboard for our investigation. Who would have thought that a seemingly fantastical tome could hold a shred of relevance to our scientific pursuit?

Connecting back to our literature review, the study by J. Smith and A. Doe hinted at an elusive but intriguing correlation, much like a stubborn bug in a complex software program that eventually yielded to diligent troubleshooting. Tangentially, "Pollution Pandemonium" and "Code Quest," initially dismissed as mere recreational diversions, turned out to be curious inspirations. While we wouldn't go so far as to say that these games hold the keys to the kingdom, they sparked a glimmer of insight into our research.

Our statistical data bolstered the evidence presented in prior research, with our findings aligning remarkably with the musings of T. Jones and the fictional creations of A. Hacker and P. Airien. As metaphysical as it may seem, it appears that the misty narratives of "Mists of Coding Madness" hold a grain of truth.

Is there a causal relationship between the atmospheric conditions of Hagerstown and the choice to pursue a coding career? Or is this correlation a mere peculiarity? Our results may just nudge us closer to unraveling this conundrum. However, we dare not jump to conclusions just yet – after all, correlation does not imply causation. But the strength of the relationship we've uncovered certainly beckons us deeper into the fog of inquiry.

Our findings underscore the need for a more nuanced understanding of the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community. As we peel back the layers of this unexpected correlation, we anticipate the spark of intrigue and the gust of fresh insights that may revolutionize our perspective on the intersection of air pollution and programming.

In the end, the enigma of Hagerstown's polluted air and its impact on the coding landscape has captivated our imagination, leaving us on the edge of our seats, eager and slightly breathless for what lies ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland and The number of computer programmers in Maryland. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Computer programmers are a curious bunch. They thrive in the digital jungle, navigating through lines of code, debugging errors, and occasionally muttering incantations to coax software into functioning. But what if we told you that they might also have a peculiar affinity for polluted air? Yes, you heard that right. We have embarked on a journey to untangle the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of programmers in the state. Strap in, folks, as we delve into this coding conundrum and explore the unseen forces shaping the world of programming.
The world of programming is like a labyrinth—one minute you're lost in a maze of syntax, and the next, you emerge triumphantly with a perfectly functioning algorithm. As the technological landscape continues to evolve, the demand for skilled programmers has soared to unprecedented heights. Meanwhile, Hagerstown, nestled in the idyllic mountains of Maryland, has been grappling with its own challenges, particularly in the realm of air quality. What a curious pairing, you might say. The cacophony of keystrokes echoing in programming hubs and the subtle hum of air purifiers battling the smog—could there be a connection lurking beneath the surface?
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, it becomes apparent that our exploration is not merely about numbers and statistics. It's about deciphering the subtle dance between human endeavor and the environment, about finding the silver lining in the haze of environmental challenges. So, sit back, grab a cup of coffee (or perhaps some clean, filtered air), and join us in uncovering the unexpected interplay between pixels and pollutants. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing correlation, we might just stumble upon a revelation that leaves us breathless—both figuratively and, perhaps, due to the potential air pollution in Hagerstown.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted on the relationship between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland and the number of computer programmers in Maryland revealed a surprisingly robust correlation. Our research team found a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, which indicates a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.6817207 further supports the strength of this relationship, explaining approximately 68.17% of the variance in the number of computer programmers in Maryland based on air pollution levels in Hagerstown.
Upon conducting the statistical analysis, the p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship. This finding suggests that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance, bolstering the credibility of our results.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels in Hagerstown and the number of computer programmers in Maryland. The upward trend depicted in the scatterplot visually reinforces the positive relationship uncovered in our analysis.
These results raise intriguing questions about the potential influence of air quality on the decisions of aspiring and established programmers. While the link between air pollution in Hagerstown and the proliferation of programmers in Maryland may appear surprising at first glance, our findings provide compelling evidence supporting this connection.
Overall, the substantial correlation observed in this study compels us to reconsider the factors shaping the demographics of the programming community. This unexpected revelation adds a fresh dimension to the ongoing discourse on the environmental and occupational influences in the world of programming, demonstrating the need for further investigation into the interplay between environmental factors and occupational choices.
The statistical evidence presented in this study paints a vivid picture of the intricate ecosystem of coding amidst the ambient conditions of air pollution, leading to a breath of fresh air in understanding the dynamics of the programming landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of the rather unexpected connection between air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the proliferation of computer programmers in the state. Our research has shed light on the uncharted territory where bytes and pollutants intersect, leaving us gasping for, well, theoretical oxygen. The correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, akin to a perfectly optimized code, highlights the robust relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the notion that this correlation is not a random occurrence, but rather a substantial revelation worthy of further exploration. Our results, much like a well-crafted punchline, offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the complexity of factors influencing the coding community. As we navigate this labyrinth of analysis, it becomes clear that the environment may serve as an unforeseen catalyst in the decisions of programmers, a notion that initially seems as paradoxical as a programmer enjoying polluted air.

This study beckons us to contemplate the intricate dance between occupational choices and environmental conditions, unraveling a correlation that defies conventional wisdom. The scatterplot illustrates the upward trend with sheer delight, much like a graph that has stumbled upon a particularly humorous anomaly.

In essence, as we set our sights on further exploration, it is evident that no stone shall remain unturned in unraveling the entwined fate of polluted air and prolific programmers. We have chuckled at the unexpected correlation, pondered the implications, and now stand firm in our assertion that no more research is required in this area. We leave the realm of air pollution and coding knowing that we have cracked the code, in more ways than one.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Informatics and Tech Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Informatics and Human Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Coding Conundrum: Unraveling the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Hagerstown and the Proliferation of Programmers in Maryland with an abstract of In the quest to understand the factors influencing the dynamic field of programming, this study delves into the unexpected link between air pollution levels in Hagerstown, Maryland, and the burgeoning population of computer programmers across the state. Through rigorous data analysis, we unearthed a striking correlation, leaving our research team figuratively breathless. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years from 2003 to 2022, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8256638, surpassing our expectations and leaving a significant impression. Our p-value of less than 0.01 only fueled our enthusiasm for this peculiar phenomenon. This study may offer a breath of fresh air in understanding the environmental and occupational influences on the coding community, unravelling the intricate ecosystem of compiling code amidst the swirling winds of air pollution.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, programming, Hagerstown, Maryland, correlation, data analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, occupational influences, code compilation, environmental factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland

The number of computer programmers in Maryland
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of computer programmers in Maryland
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of computer programmers in Maryland

Correlation r = 0.8256638 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6817207 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of computer programmers in Maryland) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.4E-6. 0.0000073636359826815320000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 135,802 random variables You don't actually need 135 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.6, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland (Bad air quality days)1.127820.3773580.7490640.3649640.37594000.32679700.2754820000000000
The number of computer programmers in Maryland (Computer Programmers)125709410898088509030821080607000680073906980591055805300471047905610588049403410




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.12782,0.377358,0.749064,0.364964,0.37594,0,0,0.326797,0,0.275482,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([12570,9410,8980,8850,9030,8210,8060,7000,6800,7390,6980,5910,5580,5300,4710,4790,5610,5880,4940,3410,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Hagerstown, Maryland"
array_2_name = "The number of computer programmers in Maryland"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5372 · Black Variable ID: 20699 · Red Variable ID: 9070
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0