about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,488 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and the second variable is Kerosene used in Germany, East.  The chart goes from 1980 to 1990, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality in Wisconsin Rapids decreased, the disgruntled molecules of pollution decided to pack up and move to Germany, East for a breath of fresh air. This led to a kerosene reduction as the molecules, now known as the "fumes-on-tour," realized they were just too exhausted to keep the kerosene production running.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a hyper-realistic scene depicting a hazy atmosphere in Wisconsin Rapids, with smoke and fumes emitted from factories and vehicles. Meanwhile, in Germany, East, show a kerosene production site with a slowdown in activity. The molecules from Wisconsin Rapids, known as "fumes-on-tour," should be visually represented as they arrive in Germany and settle in for a much-needed rest. The contrasting scenes should emphasize the effects of pollution and the relief of cleaner air. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Low poly High-tech Data cyber art Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East, in the following situation: As the air quality in Wisconsin Rapids decreased, the disgruntled molecules of pollution decided to pack up and move to Germany, East for a breath of fresh air. This led to a kerosene reduction as the molecules, now known as the "fumes-on-tour," realized they were just too exhausted to keep the kerosene production running.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Wisconsin Rapids, the air became hazy with pollution, as factories and vehicles emitted smoke and fumes into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, in Germany, East, the kerosene production was slowing down as the molecules from Wisconsin Rapids, now known as the "fumes-on-tour," arrived, seeking cleaner air. The once bustling kerosene production site now appeared quiet and relieved as the tired molecules settled in for a much-needed rest.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Wisconsin Rapids, the air became hazy with pollution, as factories and vehicles emitted smoke and fumes into the atmosphere. Meanwhile, in Germany, East, the kerosene production was slowing down as the molecules from Wisconsin Rapids, now known as the "fumes-on-tour," arrived, seeking cleaner air. The once bustling kerosene production site now appeared quiet and relieved as the tired molecules settled in for a much-needed rest. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a hyper-realistic scene depicting a hazy atmosphere in Wisconsin Rapids, with smoke and fumes emitted from factories and vehicles. Meanwhile, in Germany, East, show a kerosene production site with a slowdown in activity. The molecules from Wisconsin Rapids, known as "fumes-on-tour," should be visually represented as they arrive in Germany and settle in for a much-needed rest. The contrasting scenes should emphasize the effects of pollution and the relief of cleaner air.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin caused Kerosene used in Germany, East to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany

The Journal of Eclectic Atmospheric Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9991826 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 1990.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
The examination of environmental factors and their interconnectedness has long been a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of understanding the complex web of influences on air quality, researchers often find themselves traversing unexpected paths, uncovering peculiar associations, and stumbling upon correlations that defy conventional explanations. In this context, our study offers a unique vantage point, meandering through the bucolic landscapes of Wisconsin Rapids and navigating the enigmatic labyrinth of kerosene usage in East Germany. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we are compelled to unravel the olfactory intrigue that permeates the air in Wisconsin Rapids and the curious aroma of kerosene that once wafted through the towns and cities of East Germany.

Air quality, often likened to the invisible hand that shapes our respiratory experiences, stands as a touchstone for environmental assessments. The serene environs of Wisconsin Rapids, juxtaposed against the industrial remnants of East Germany, provide an evocative backdrop for our investigation. Drawing from the dataset obtained from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously scrutinized pollutant levels, atmospheric compositions, and meteorological indices in the vicinity of Wisconsin Rapids. Meanwhile, our inquiry into the utilization of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany led us down a convoluted path that echoed with the echoes of history.

As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and empirical observations, we are poised to unearth a correlation that, like the aroma of brewing coffee on a chilly morning, exudes an intoxicating allure. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that stands as a veritable shepherd, guiding us through the statistical pastures with a steadfastness that is both admirable and disconcerting. The tangled web of data points, when subjected to rigorous analysis, culminates in a correlation coefficient that wields an eerily precise value. The statistical significance, echoed by a p-value of less than 0.01, propels us into a realm where serendipity and skepticism converge.

Thus, our foray into this multidimensional realm not only illuminates the nuances of air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also beckons us to graze in the pastures of whimsy and wonder, where the aroma of kerosene mingles with the fragrant zephyrs of historical intrigue. As we inch closer to unraveling this aromatic enigma, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where correlation meets causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The examination of environmental factors and their interconnectedness has long been a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of understanding the complex web of influences on air quality, researchers often find themselves traversing unexpected paths, uncovering peculiar associations, and stumbling upon correlations that defy conventional explanations. In this context, our study offers a unique vantage point, meandering through the bucolic landscapes of Wisconsin Rapids and navigating the enigmatic labyrinth of kerosene usage in East Germany. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we are compelled to unravel the olfactory intrigue that permeates the air in Wisconsin Rapids and the curious aroma of kerosene that once wafted through the towns and cities of East Germany.
Air quality, often likened to the invisible hand that shapes our respiratory experiences, stands as a touchstone for environmental assessments. The serene environs of Wisconsin Rapids, juxtaposed against the industrial remnants of East Germany, provide an evocative backdrop for our investigation. Drawing from the dataset obtained from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously scrutinized pollutant levels, atmospheric compositions, and meteorological indices in the vicinity of Wisconsin Rapids. Meanwhile, our inquiry into the utilization of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany led us down a convoluted path that echoed with the echoes of history.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and empirical observations, we are poised to unearth a correlation that, like the aroma of brewing coffee on a chilly morning, exudes an intoxicating allure. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that stands as a veritable shepherd, guiding us through the statistical pastures with a steadfastness that is both admirable and disconcerting. The tangled web of data points, when subjected to rigorous analysis, culminates in a correlation coefficient that wields an eerily precise value. The statistical significance, echoed by a p-value of less than 0.01, propels us into a realm where serendipity and skepticism converge.
Thus, our foray into this multidimensional realm not only illuminates the nuances of air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also beckons us to graze in the pastures of whimsy and wonder, where the aroma of kerosene mingles with the fragrant zephyrs of historical intrigue. As we inch closer to unraveling this aromatic enigma, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where correlation meets causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Effects of Air Quality on Public Health" by Smith et al., the authors find a compelling association between air pollutant levels and various respiratory conditions in urban and suburban settings. Similarly, Doe's "Kerosene Consumption and Societal Shifts in East Germany" delves into the socio-economic ramifications of kerosene usage in the context of the German Democratic Republic. Furthermore, Jones et al. examine the intricate interplay between industrialization and air quality in their seminal work, "Industrial Revolution and Urban Air Pollution."

Turning to non-fiction books, "Environmental Sustainability in the 21st Century" by Jane Green provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary environmental challenges, while "The History of Energy Consumption in Europe" by John Brown uncovers the historical dynamics of energy usage on the European continent.

In the realm of fiction, the evocative narrative of "The Scent of Memories" by Lily White captures the olfactory reveries of bygone eras, offering a whimsical exploration of sensory experiences. Additionally, the dystopian elements of "Fumes of the Future" by Max Steam resonate with the industrial landscapes of a bygone era in East Germany.

Internet memes have also played a role in shaping perceptions of air quality and kerosene usage. The infamous "Hide the Pain Harold" meme, with its wistful expression, humorously mirrors the conflicting emotions evoked by the juxtaposition of crisp Wisconsin air and the pungent aroma of kerosene.

While these sources offer valuable insights, our study signifies a departure from the conventional trodden paths of research, venturing into the whimsical realm where correlation dances with causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery. As we delve deeper into this aromatic enigma, let us embark on this scholarly escapade, where the buoyancy of statistical triumph meets the quirkiness of unexpected correlations.

Shall we press on, dear reader, or have you been sufficiently filled with the intoxicating allure of our academic pursuit?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 1990

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The examination of environmental factors and their interconnectedness has long been a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of understanding the complex web of influences on air quality, researchers often find themselves traversing unexpected paths, uncovering peculiar associations, and stumbling upon correlations that defy conventional explanations. In this context, our study offers a unique vantage point, meandering through the bucolic landscapes of Wisconsin Rapids and navigating the enigmatic labyrinth of kerosene usage in East Germany. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we are compelled to unravel the olfactory intrigue that permeates the air in Wisconsin Rapids and the curious aroma of kerosene that once wafted through the towns and cities of East Germany.
Air quality, often likened to the invisible hand that shapes our respiratory experiences, stands as a touchstone for environmental assessments. The serene environs of Wisconsin Rapids, juxtaposed against the industrial remnants of East Germany, provide an evocative backdrop for our investigation. Drawing from the dataset obtained from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously scrutinized pollutant levels, atmospheric compositions, and meteorological indices in the vicinity of Wisconsin Rapids. Meanwhile, our inquiry into the utilization of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany led us down a convoluted path that echoed with the echoes of history.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and empirical observations, we are poised to unearth a correlation that, like the aroma of brewing coffee on a chilly morning, exudes an intoxicating allure. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that stands as a veritable shepherd, guiding us through the statistical pastures with a steadfastness that is both admirable and disconcerting. The tangled web of data points, when subjected to rigorous analysis, culminates in a correlation coefficient that wields an eerily precise value. The statistical significance, echoed by a p-value of less than 0.01, propels us into a realm where serendipity and skepticism converge.
Thus, our foray into this multidimensional realm not only illuminates the nuances of air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also beckons us to graze in the pastures of whimsy and wonder, where the aroma of kerosene mingles with the fragrant zephyrs of historical intrigue. As we inch closer to unraveling this aromatic enigma, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where correlation meets causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To venture into the hazy realms of empirical inquiry, our research team embarked on a meticulous odyssey that wove together fine threads of data collection, statistical analysis, and a pinch of academic fortitude. The foundation of our investigation rested on the procurement of relevant datasets, an endeavor that resembled a digital scavenger hunt through the labyrinthine expanse of online repositories.

In the quest for air quality data in Wisconsin Rapids, our intrepid team scoured through the archives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sifting through a plethora of pollutant levels, ambient air quality indices, and meteorological parameters. Armed with an unyielding spirit and a coffee pot brimming with determination, we navigated the administrative thickets of the EPA's digital forest to harvest the rich fruits of our labor.

Simultaneously, our pursuit of kerosene usage in East Germany unfurled like a historical tapestry, replete with cryptic patterns and elusive details. Extricating nuggets of information from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), our scholarly escapade led us through the annals of energy statistics and clandestine corridors of kerosene consumption, resonating with echoes of a bygone era.

Having meticulously gleaned through the labyrinth of data, we summoned the potent wizardry of statistical tools to illuminate the connections that lay veiled amidst the numbers. Employing a curious fusion of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we sought to disentangle the intricate dance between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the enigmatic aura of kerosene in East Germany. Our statistical arsenal, akin to a scholarly Swiss army knife, included the venerable Pearson correlation coefficient and its plucky companion, the p-value.

The robust data from 1980 to 1990 metamorphosed into rich tapestries of associations and disassociations, yielding a correlation coefficient that stood as a beacon amidst the empirical fog. Akin to the discerning eye of an art connoisseur, our statistical prowess discerned nuances in the data that danced to the rhythm of our scholarly inquiry.

And thus, with a combination of unwavering resolve, digital spelunking skills, and statistical sorcery, our research journey culminated in a comprehensive analysis poised to unfurl the aromatic mysteries of air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the captivating allure of kerosene in East Germany.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 1990, you found a correlation 0.9991826, r-squared of 0.9983659, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The examination of environmental factors and their interconnectedness has long been a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of understanding the complex web of influences on air quality, researchers often find themselves traversing unexpected paths, uncovering peculiar associations, and stumbling upon correlations that defy conventional explanations. In this context, our study offers a unique vantage point, meandering through the bucolic landscapes of Wisconsin Rapids and navigating the enigmatic labyrinth of kerosene usage in East Germany. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we are compelled to unravel the olfactory intrigue that permeates the air in Wisconsin Rapids and the curious aroma of kerosene that once wafted through the towns and cities of East Germany.
Air quality, often likened to the invisible hand that shapes our respiratory experiences, stands as a touchstone for environmental assessments. The serene environs of Wisconsin Rapids, juxtaposed against the industrial remnants of East Germany, provide an evocative backdrop for our investigation. Drawing from the dataset obtained from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously scrutinized pollutant levels, atmospheric compositions, and meteorological indices in the vicinity of Wisconsin Rapids. Meanwhile, our inquiry into the utilization of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany led us down a convoluted path that echoed with the echoes of history.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and empirical observations, we are poised to unearth a correlation that, like the aroma of brewing coffee on a chilly morning, exudes an intoxicating allure. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that stands as a veritable shepherd, guiding us through the statistical pastures with a steadfastness that is both admirable and disconcerting. The tangled web of data points, when subjected to rigorous analysis, culminates in a correlation coefficient that wields an eerily precise value. The statistical significance, echoed by a p-value of less than 0.01, propels us into a realm where serendipity and skepticism converge.
Thus, our foray into this multidimensional realm not only illuminates the nuances of air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also beckons us to graze in the pastures of whimsy and wonder, where the aroma of kerosene mingles with the fragrant zephyrs of historical intrigue. As we inch closer to unraveling this aromatic enigma, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where correlation meets causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data yielded remarkably intriguing results, reflective of the intricate dance between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. Our research unearthed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, indicating an exceptionally tight relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9983659 further accentuates the strength of this correlation, akin to the firm grip of a connoisseur savoring a fine wine. Moreover, the statistical significance underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the undeniable bond between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the enigmatic kerosene conundrum in East Germany. It seems that the winds of correlation have blown through these distinct locales, leaving an indelible mark on our empirical landscape.

Our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the formidable correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. The data points, akin to celestial bodies in a harmonious constellation, coalesce to form a pattern that defies the whims of chance and caprice. This visual representation serves as a testament to the compelling relationship that our research has brought to light.

In conclusion, the results of our investigation not only attest to the robust correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and kerosene usage in East Germany but also beckon the scientific community to indulge in the aromatic whimsy that permeates this enlightening correlation. The confluence of empirical rigor and olfactory intrigue, encapsulated in our findings, stands as a fitting ode to the captivating interplay of environmental dynamics and historical legacies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Effects of Air Quality on Public Health" by Smith et al., the authors find a compelling association between air pollutant levels and various respiratory conditions in urban and suburban settings. Similarly, Doe's "Kerosene Consumption and Societal Shifts in East Germany" delves into the socio-economic ramifications of kerosene usage in the context of the German Democratic Republic. Furthermore, Jones et al. examine the intricate interplay between industrialization and air quality in their seminal work, "Industrial Revolution and Urban Air Pollution."
Turning to non-fiction books, "Environmental Sustainability in the 21st Century" by Jane Green provides a comprehensive overview of contemporary environmental challenges, while "The History of Energy Consumption in Europe" by John Brown uncovers the historical dynamics of energy usage on the European continent.
In the realm of fiction, the evocative narrative of "The Scent of Memories" by Lily White captures the olfactory reveries of bygone eras, offering a whimsical exploration of sensory experiences. Additionally, the dystopian elements of "Fumes of the Future" by Max Steam resonate with the industrial landscapes of a bygone era in East Germany.
Internet memes have also played a role in shaping perceptions of air quality and kerosene usage. The infamous "Hide the Pain Harold" meme, with its wistful expression, humorously mirrors the conflicting emotions evoked by the juxtaposition of crisp Wisconsin air and the pungent aroma of kerosene.
While these sources offer valuable insights, our study signifies a departure from the conventional trodden paths of research, venturing into the whimsical realm where correlation dances with causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery. As we delve deeper into this aromatic enigma, let us embark on this scholarly escapade, where the buoyancy of statistical triumph meets the quirkiness of unexpected correlations.
Shall we press on, dear reader, or have you been sufficiently filled with the intoxicating allure of our academic pursuit?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded remarkably intriguing results, reflective of the intricate dance between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. Our research unearthed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, indicating an exceptionally tight relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9983659 further accentuates the strength of this correlation, akin to the firm grip of a connoisseur savoring a fine wine. Moreover, the statistical significance underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the undeniable bond between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the enigmatic kerosene conundrum in East Germany. It seems that the winds of correlation have blown through these distinct locales, leaving an indelible mark on our empirical landscape.
Our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the formidable correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. The data points, akin to celestial bodies in a harmonious constellation, coalesce to form a pattern that defies the whims of chance and caprice. This visual representation serves as a testament to the compelling relationship that our research has brought to light.
In conclusion, the results of our investigation not only attest to the robust correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and kerosene usage in East Germany but also beckon the scientific community to indulge in the aromatic whimsy that permeates this enlightening correlation. The confluence of empirical rigor and olfactory intrigue, encapsulated in our findings, stands as a fitting ode to the captivating interplay of environmental dynamics and historical legacies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide compelling evidence for the interconnectedness between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value substantiate the curious juxtaposition that we set out to explore. It is as if the aroma of kerosene in East Germany wafts across the Atlantic, mingling with the crisp air of Wisconsin to form an intricate dance of environmental dynamics and historical legacies.

Delving back into the literature review, we cannot overlook the whimsical references to fiction and internet memes. What may have initially appeared as jests or mere amusement at first glance, now underscore the profound complexity and interconnectedness of environmental and historical factors. The evocative narratives of "The Scent of Memories" and "Fumes of the Future" indeed resonate with the olfactory enigma that our investigation has unraveled. Similarly, the "Hide the Pain Harold" meme, with its wistful expression, seems to mirror the conflicting emotions evoked by the juxtaposition of crisp Wisconsin air and the pungent aroma of kerosene. Our research has effectively transformed these whimsical references into tangible manifestations of the interconnectedness between air quality and kerosene usage.

Furthermore, the literature review also shed light on the societal shifts in East Germany and the environmental challenges of the 21st century. The socio-economic ramifications of kerosene usage in East Germany, as explored by Doe, take on a new depth in light of our findings. It is as if the historical and environmental legacies of East Germany have conspired to intertwine with the air quality dynamics of Wisconsin Rapids, creating a symphonic crescendo of empirical revelation.

In essence, our results not only corroborate the prior research but also elevate the whimsical and unexpected references to a level of earnest consideration. The scientific community and even those who may have once approached these correlations with a jovial air are now beckoned to indulge in the aromatic whimsy that underpins this enlightening correlation. As we unwrap the intricacies and complexities of this intercontinental aromatic tango, we invite our readers to savor the unexpected flavors of scientific discovery and the olfactory intrigue that permeates this bedazzling correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin and Kerosene used in Germany, East. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The examination of environmental factors and their interconnectedness has long been a cornerstone of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of understanding the complex web of influences on air quality, researchers often find themselves traversing unexpected paths, uncovering peculiar associations, and stumbling upon correlations that defy conventional explanations. In this context, our study offers a unique vantage point, meandering through the bucolic landscapes of Wisconsin Rapids and navigating the enigmatic labyrinth of kerosene usage in East Germany. As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we are compelled to unravel the olfactory intrigue that permeates the air in Wisconsin Rapids and the curious aroma of kerosene that once wafted through the towns and cities of East Germany.
Air quality, often likened to the invisible hand that shapes our respiratory experiences, stands as a touchstone for environmental assessments. The serene environs of Wisconsin Rapids, juxtaposed against the industrial remnants of East Germany, provide an evocative backdrop for our investigation. Drawing from the dataset obtained from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency, we meticulously scrutinized pollutant levels, atmospheric compositions, and meteorological indices in the vicinity of Wisconsin Rapids. Meanwhile, our inquiry into the utilization of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany led us down a convoluted path that echoed with the echoes of history.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data and empirical observations, we are poised to unearth a correlation that, like the aroma of brewing coffee on a chilly morning, exudes an intoxicating allure. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient that stands as a veritable shepherd, guiding us through the statistical pastures with a steadfastness that is both admirable and disconcerting. The tangled web of data points, when subjected to rigorous analysis, culminates in a correlation coefficient that wields an eerily precise value. The statistical significance, echoed by a p-value of less than 0.01, propels us into a realm where serendipity and skepticism converge.
Thus, our foray into this multidimensional realm not only illuminates the nuances of air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also beckons us to graze in the pastures of whimsy and wonder, where the aroma of kerosene mingles with the fragrant zephyrs of historical intrigue. As we inch closer to unraveling this aromatic enigma, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where correlation meets causation, and the scent of a conundrum intertwines with the unmistakable fragrance of scientific discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded remarkably intriguing results, reflective of the intricate dance between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. Our research unearthed a strikingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, indicating an exceptionally tight relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.9983659 further accentuates the strength of this correlation, akin to the firm grip of a connoisseur savoring a fine wine. Moreover, the statistical significance underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01 underscores the undeniable bond between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the enigmatic kerosene conundrum in East Germany. It seems that the winds of correlation have blown through these distinct locales, leaving an indelible mark on our empirical landscape.
Our findings are succinctly captured in Fig. 1, which depicts a scatterplot showcasing the formidable correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in East Germany. The data points, akin to celestial bodies in a harmonious constellation, coalesce to form a pattern that defies the whims of chance and caprice. This visual representation serves as a testament to the compelling relationship that our research has brought to light.
In conclusion, the results of our investigation not only attest to the robust correlation between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and kerosene usage in East Germany but also beckon the scientific community to indulge in the aromatic whimsy that permeates this enlightening correlation. The confluence of empirical rigor and olfactory intrigue, encapsulated in our findings, stands as a fitting ode to the captivating interplay of environmental dynamics and historical legacies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the midst of our research, we found ourselves immersed in a peculiar dance of data points, navigating through the intricate intertwining of air quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the utilization of kerosene in erstwhile East Germany. The remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, reminiscent of a finely tuned orchestra playing in perfect harmony, stands as a testament to the undeniable relationship between these seemingly distinct variables. As we delved deeper into the enigmatic world of kerosene usage in East Germany, we couldn't help but revel in the aromatic whimsy that permeated our investigation.

The scatterplot presented in Fig. 1, akin to a celestial painting unfolding before our eyes, vividly captures the formidable correlation, lending credence to the intriguing confluence of empirical rigor and olfactory allure. However, despite the magnetic pull of our findings, it is with a twinge of whimsical resignation that we assert the need for no further research in this aromatic realm. The correlation, much like a well-crafted joke, stands firm and unwavering, leaving no room for further statistical flirtation. Thus, we bid adieu to this aromatic odyssey, confident in our findings and satiated by the whimsical harmony of correlation that lingers in the air.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Atmospheric Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Airborne Aromatics Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Scent of a Correlation: Exploring the Air Quality in Wisconsin Rapids and the Kerosene Conundrum in East Germany with an abstract of This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, and the use of kerosene in East Germany. Leveraging data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, our research team diligently investigated this curious juxtaposition. Our findings unveil a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9991826, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1980 to 1990. While the correlation may seem as clear as the air on a crisp Wisconsin morning, delving into the realm of kerosene usage in East Germany adds an intriguing layer of complexity to the investigation. This study not only sheds light on the air quality dynamics in Wisconsin Rapids but also offers a whimsical glimpse into the enigmatic world of kerosene in the erstwhile East Germany.

ChatGPT:

air quality, Wisconsin Rapids, kerosene usage, East Germany, correlation analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, 1980-1990, air pollution, environmental impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Wisconsin Rapids-Marshfield, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin

Kerosene used in Germany, East
Detailed data title: Volume of kerosene used consumed in Germany, East in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Kerosene used in Germany, East

Correlation r = 0.9991826 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9983659 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Kerosene used in Germany, East) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin) over the 11 years from 1980 through 1990.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-14. 0.0000000000000746134883294189
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 7.5E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,402,402,466,227 random variables You don't actually need 13 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990
Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin (Good air quality)90.61030000000000
Kerosene used in Germany, East (Million Barrels/Day)11000000.30.2750.2530.2550.233




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([90.6103,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([11,0,0,0,0,0,0.3,0.275,0.253,0.255,0.233,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "Kerosene used in Germany, East"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 5488 · Black Variable ID: 21472 · Red Variable ID: 24455
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0