about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,491 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Houston and the second variable is The number of postal service machine operators in Texas.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air became cleaner, the postal service machine operators no longer needed to battle smog and grime buildup on the machines. With less pollution, the machines stayed cleaner for longer, leading to a reduced need for operators to perform maintenance. The job became so much cleaner that it essentially sorted itself out!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting the scene in Houston where the air pollution gradually cleared up, allowing the skyline to become more visible. In the foreground, illustrate postal service machine operators in Texas at work. Show them with reduced pollution, making their job much easier and cleaner. The machines should be depicted as cleaner and less grimy, with operators finding their work much easier as a result of the diminished need for maintenance. Keep the visual depiction simple and refrain from including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Magic realism inspired by bauhaus 3D Pixar Style
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas, in the following situation: As the air became cleaner, the postal service machine operators no longer needed to battle smog and grime buildup on the machines. With less pollution, the machines stayed cleaner for longer, leading to a reduced need for operators to perform maintenance. The job became so much cleaner that it essentially sorted itself out!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Houston, the air pollution gradually cleared up, allowing the skyline to become more visible. Amidst this cleaner environment, postal service machine operators in Texas found their work much easier. They no longer had to constantly battle smog and grime buildup on the machines. With reduced pollution, the machines stayed cleaner for longer, diminishing the need for operators to perform maintenance. As a result, the job became so much cleaner that it essentially sorted itself out.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In Houston, the air pollution gradually cleared up, allowing the skyline to become more visible. Amidst this cleaner environment, postal service machine operators in Texas found their work much easier. They no longer had to constantly battle smog and grime buildup on the machines. With reduced pollution, the machines stayed cleaner for longer, diminishing the need for operators to perform maintenance. As a result, the job became so much cleaner that it essentially sorted itself out. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s, depicting the scene in Houston where the air pollution gradually cleared up, allowing the skyline to become more visible. In the foreground, illustrate postal service machine operators in Texas at work. Show them with reduced pollution, making their job much easier and cleaner. The machines should be depicted as cleaner and less grimy, with operators finding their work much easier as a result of the diminished need for maintenance. Keep the visual depiction simple and refrain from including any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Houston caused The number of postal service machine operators in Texas to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

The Journal of Environmental Health and Occupational Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The connection between environmental factors and labor trends has long been an area of fascination for researchers and policymakers alike. One particularly intriguing phenomenon in this realm is the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. This research sets out to explore this unlikely relationship, adding a touch of whimsy to the typically serious landscape of environmental and labor economics.

As we dive into the data, it becomes clear that the Lone Star State's air quality and its postal service workforce may be engaged in an intricate, if not slightly comical, pas de deux. After all, who would have thought that the density of fine particulate matter in Houston's air could have anything to do with the bustling world of postal service machinery? Yet, as the data presents itself, it seems that there may be more to the tale than meets the eye.

The aim of this paper is to unravel the enigma surrounding this intriguing correlation and shed light on the potential mechanisms at play. We will unpack the numbers, dust off our statistical tools, and endeavor to make sense of this curious coupling between hazy skies and postal service prowess. As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that sometimes, in the world of research, the most improbable connections lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between environmental factors and labor trends has long been an area of fascination for researchers and policymakers alike. One particularly intriguing phenomenon in this realm is the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. This research sets out to explore this unlikely relationship, adding a touch of whimsy to the typically serious landscape of environmental and labor economics.
As we dive into the data, it becomes clear that the Lone Star State's air quality and its postal service workforce may be engaged in an intricate, if not slightly comical, pas de deux. After all, who would have thought that the density of fine particulate matter in Houston's air could have anything to do with the bustling world of postal service machinery? Yet, as the data presents itself, it seems that there may be more to the tale than meets the eye.
The aim of this paper is to unravel the enigma surrounding this intriguing correlation and shed light on the potential mechanisms at play. We will unpack the numbers, dust off our statistical tools, and endeavor to make sense of this curious coupling between hazy skies and postal service prowess. As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that sometimes, in the world of research, the most improbable connections lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A number of scholarly works have sought to uncover the subtle and unexpected relationship between environmental factors and labor dynamics, albeit in a more serious manner. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a thorough investigation into the impact of air quality on occupational health, shedding light on the detrimental effects of air pollution on workers' well-being. Similarly, Doe (2017) examined the labor market response to environmental policies, providing valuable insights into the labor force's adaptability to shifting environmental conditions. Jones (2020) delved into the intricacies of occupational demand in the face of environmental challenges, offering a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between environmental factors and labor market trends.

Turning to more accessible literature, several non-fiction works have touched upon the subtle dance between environmental circumstances and labor demands. "The Air We Breathe: A Journey into the World of Environmental Health" by Dr. Benjamin Clean explores the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health, with cursory mentions of its potential influence on occupational preferences. Additionally, "The Economics of Environmental Regulation" by Dr. Clara Green delves into the far-reaching implications of environmental policies on labor dynamics, providing a broader perspective on the interconnections in question.

As we venture into the realm of fiction, one cannot help but note the thematic resonances with the enigmatic correlation under investigation. "The Postman Always Rings Twice" by James M. Cain presents a noir tale of love, murder, and, indeed, the steadfast dedication of postal workers. Similarly, "The Air We Breathe" by Figment Author immerses readers in a fantastical world where the very air holds mysterious powers, offering a whimsical parallel to our own investigation.

However, in our quest for understanding, it is also crucial to consider unorthodox sources of knowledge. A thorough review of the back labels of shampoo bottles, while highly unconventional, has provided intriguing insights into the myriad fragrances that fill the air - a tangential yet oddly relevant observation to our exploration of air pollution and postal service operators.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connection between environmental factors and labor trends has long been an area of fascination for researchers and policymakers alike. One particularly intriguing phenomenon in this realm is the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. This research sets out to explore this unlikely relationship, adding a touch of whimsy to the typically serious landscape of environmental and labor economics.
As we dive into the data, it becomes clear that the Lone Star State's air quality and its postal service workforce may be engaged in an intricate, if not slightly comical, pas de deux. After all, who would have thought that the density of fine particulate matter in Houston's air could have anything to do with the bustling world of postal service machinery? Yet, as the data presents itself, it seems that there may be more to the tale than meets the eye.
The aim of this paper is to unravel the enigma surrounding this intriguing correlation and shed light on the potential mechanisms at play. We will unpack the numbers, dust off our statistical tools, and endeavor to make sense of this curious coupling between hazy skies and postal service prowess. As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that sometimes, in the world of research, the most improbable connections lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved a rigorous and extensive data collection process, drawing from sources that ranged from the Environmental Protection Agency to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data spanned a timeframe from 2003 to 2022, encompassing a broad swath of temporal fluctuations in both air pollution levels and the employment of postal service machine operators.

To begin, our research team delved into the Environmental Protection Agency's treasure trove of air quality data, which provided detailed information on various pollutants such as particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. The intrepid researchers embarked on a virtual expedition through the databases, navigating the labyrinthine corridors of environmental data to extract the relevant nuggets of information relating to Houston's atmospheric composition.

Simultaneously, the Bureau of Labor Statistics' archives stood as a bastion of labor market statistics, offering a panoramic view of employment trends across diverse occupational categories. With diligent keystrokes and unwavering focus, the team scrutinized the employment figures for postal service machine operators in the vast expanse of Texas, from the bustling urban centers to the tranquil rural outposts.

Having amassed this voluminous yet invaluable dataset, the next phase entailed a harmonious blend of econometric and statistical analyses. The team choreographed a captivating dance between regression models and time series analysis, seeking to unravel the intricate interplay between air pollution levels and the ebb and flow of postal service machinery operators.

The statistical software, a ubiquitous partner in this intellectual journey, dutifully crunched the numbers and grappled with the perplexing variance-covariance matrices. With each iteration of the models, the team marveled at the emergence of coefficient estimates and p-values, which served as the guiding stars in navigating the murky depths of data analysis.

Upon the convergence of these analytical threads, the correlation coefficient materialized, standing as a robust testament to the surprising affinity between air pollution levels in Houston and the employment of postal service machine operators in Texas. The statistically significant p-value, akin to an elusive prize at the end of a labyrinthine quest, affirmed the credibility of this correlation, sparking incredulous amusement among the research team.

In summary, the methodology encompassed a multifaceted approach that traversed the terrain of environmental data collection, labor market scrutiny, and statistical modeling. The resulting findings bear witness to the peculiar yet captivating tango between Houston's haze and the indispensable work of postal service machinists in the Lone Star State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9037925, r-squared of 0.8168409, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The connection between environmental factors and labor trends has long been an area of fascination for researchers and policymakers alike. One particularly intriguing phenomenon in this realm is the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. This research sets out to explore this unlikely relationship, adding a touch of whimsy to the typically serious landscape of environmental and labor economics.
As we dive into the data, it becomes clear that the Lone Star State's air quality and its postal service workforce may be engaged in an intricate, if not slightly comical, pas de deux. After all, who would have thought that the density of fine particulate matter in Houston's air could have anything to do with the bustling world of postal service machinery? Yet, as the data presents itself, it seems that there may be more to the tale than meets the eye.
The aim of this paper is to unravel the enigma surrounding this intriguing correlation and shed light on the potential mechanisms at play. We will unpack the numbers, dust off our statistical tools, and endeavor to make sense of this curious coupling between hazy skies and postal service prowess. As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that sometimes, in the world of research, the most improbable connections lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9037925, with an r-squared of 0.8168409, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were observed.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust connection, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. One might even say it's as clear as the air in a pollution-free paradise.

The substantial correlation coefficient indicates that as the air pollution levels in Houston fluctuated, so did the demand for postal service machine operators in the expansive Texan landscape. This unexpected association may compel us to ponder whether individuals are seeking to escape the hazy urban air by immersing themselves in the fast-paced world of postal service machinery or if they are simply honing their hand-eye coordination skills in a jovial response to the challenges posed by increased mail volumes.

The statistically significant p-value further underscores the robustness of this relationship, dispelling any lingering doubts about its legitimacy. It appears that the enigmatic dance between dirty air and the handling of postal parcels has captivated the Texan labor market in a way that merits further investigation.

In conclusion, the results of our research undoubtedly underline the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas, serving as a captivating reminder that in the world of research, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A number of scholarly works have sought to uncover the subtle and unexpected relationship between environmental factors and labor dynamics, albeit in a more serious manner. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a thorough investigation into the impact of air quality on occupational health, shedding light on the detrimental effects of air pollution on workers' well-being. Similarly, Doe (2017) examined the labor market response to environmental policies, providing valuable insights into the labor force's adaptability to shifting environmental conditions. Jones (2020) delved into the intricacies of occupational demand in the face of environmental challenges, offering a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between environmental factors and labor market trends.
Turning to more accessible literature, several non-fiction works have touched upon the subtle dance between environmental circumstances and labor demands. "The Air We Breathe: A Journey into the World of Environmental Health" by Dr. Benjamin Clean explores the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on human health, with cursory mentions of its potential influence on occupational preferences. Additionally, "The Economics of Environmental Regulation" by Dr. Clara Green delves into the far-reaching implications of environmental policies on labor dynamics, providing a broader perspective on the interconnections in question.
As we venture into the realm of fiction, one cannot help but note the thematic resonances with the enigmatic correlation under investigation. "The Postman Always Rings Twice" by James M. Cain presents a noir tale of love, murder, and, indeed, the steadfast dedication of postal workers. Similarly, "The Air We Breathe" by Figment Author immerses readers in a fantastical world where the very air holds mysterious powers, offering a whimsical parallel to our own investigation.
However, in our quest for understanding, it is also crucial to consider unorthodox sources of knowledge. A thorough review of the back labels of shampoo bottles, while highly unconventional, has provided intriguing insights into the myriad fragrances that fill the air - a tangential yet oddly relevant observation to our exploration of air pollution and postal service operators.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9037925, with an r-squared of 0.8168409, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were observed.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust connection, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. One might even say it's as clear as the air in a pollution-free paradise.
The substantial correlation coefficient indicates that as the air pollution levels in Houston fluctuated, so did the demand for postal service machine operators in the expansive Texan landscape. This unexpected association may compel us to ponder whether individuals are seeking to escape the hazy urban air by immersing themselves in the fast-paced world of postal service machinery or if they are simply honing their hand-eye coordination skills in a jovial response to the challenges posed by increased mail volumes.
The statistically significant p-value further underscores the robustness of this relationship, dispelling any lingering doubts about its legitimacy. It appears that the enigmatic dance between dirty air and the handling of postal parcels has captivated the Texan labor market in a way that merits further investigation.
In conclusion, the results of our research undoubtedly underline the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas, serving as a captivating reminder that in the world of research, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our investigation have cast a revealing light on the hitherto unnoticed tango between air pollution in Houston and the employment of postal service machine operators in the vast Texas frontier. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 firmly bolster the earlier works that attempted to elucidate the intricate relationship between environmental factors and labor market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017) would likely marvel at how our findings served to support their earnest endeavors in unveiling the impact of air quality on occupational health and the labor force's adaptability to shifting environmental conditions, respectively.

Moreover, our results seem to echo the sentiments of Dr. Benjamin Clean in "The Air We Breathe," where the potential influence of air pollution on occupational preferences was briefly touched upon. It is remarkable how our research has transformed a passing mention in a non-fiction work into a substantial and captivating empirical observation. Likewise, the intrepid musings of Dr. Clara Green in "The Economics of Environmental Regulation" have been inadvertently substantiated by our findings, showcasing the unexpected resonance between real-world labor trends and her broader theoretical perspectives.

In a more unconventional vein, our findings beckon us to reconsider the thematic parallels with the world of fiction. The allusion to "The Postman Always Rings Twice" by James M. Cain, with its noir tale of steadfast postal dedication, assumes an uncanny relevance in light of our research. Similarly, the whimsical "The Air We Breathe" by Figment Author, with its fantastical world of mysterious airborne powers, appears to have inadvertently presaged the very real correlation we have unearthed. Perhaps fiction, as it turns out, presents more tangible connections to reality than previously thought.

Forging an unexpected link to our earlier literature review, the tangential observation of the myriad fragrances filling the air gleaned from the back labels of shampoo bottles has now assumed a newfound importance. While it may have been dismissed as an unorthodox source of knowledge, it appears that even the most unconventional sources can yield intriguing and unexpectedly relevant insights.

In conclusion, our research has not only corroborated earlier scholarly works but also brought to the fore the whimsical and serendipitous nature of discovery. The entwining of environmental factors and labor market demands in the Lone Star State has proved to be a source of both bemusement and enlightenment, showcasing that the most unsuspecting connections can yield the most fascinating revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Houston and The number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The connection between environmental factors and labor trends has long been an area of fascination for researchers and policymakers alike. One particularly intriguing phenomenon in this realm is the unexpected correlation between air pollution levels and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. This research sets out to explore this unlikely relationship, adding a touch of whimsy to the typically serious landscape of environmental and labor economics.
As we dive into the data, it becomes clear that the Lone Star State's air quality and its postal service workforce may be engaged in an intricate, if not slightly comical, pas de deux. After all, who would have thought that the density of fine particulate matter in Houston's air could have anything to do with the bustling world of postal service machinery? Yet, as the data presents itself, it seems that there may be more to the tale than meets the eye.
The aim of this paper is to unravel the enigma surrounding this intriguing correlation and shed light on the potential mechanisms at play. We will unpack the numbers, dust off our statistical tools, and endeavor to make sense of this curious coupling between hazy skies and postal service prowess. As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that sometimes, in the world of research, the most improbable connections lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a striking correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9037925, with an r-squared of 0.8168409, and a p-value of less than 0.01 were observed.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust connection, leaving no room for doubt that there's more to this relationship than meets the eye. One might even say it's as clear as the air in a pollution-free paradise.
The substantial correlation coefficient indicates that as the air pollution levels in Houston fluctuated, so did the demand for postal service machine operators in the expansive Texan landscape. This unexpected association may compel us to ponder whether individuals are seeking to escape the hazy urban air by immersing themselves in the fast-paced world of postal service machinery or if they are simply honing their hand-eye coordination skills in a jovial response to the challenges posed by increased mail volumes.
The statistically significant p-value further underscores the robustness of this relationship, dispelling any lingering doubts about its legitimacy. It appears that the enigmatic dance between dirty air and the handling of postal parcels has captivated the Texan labor market in a way that merits further investigation.
In conclusion, the results of our research undoubtedly underline the intriguing correlation between air pollution in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in Texas, serving as a captivating reminder that in the world of research, the most improbable connections can lead to the most enlightening and entertaining discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our research has shone a spotlight on the captivating correlation between air pollution in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators in the vast expanse of Texas. As we reflect on our findings, it becomes apparent that the enigmatic pas de deux between filthy air and the bustling world of postal service machinery is a tale as old as time - or at least as old as our data spanning from 2003 to 2022.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9037925, akin to a well-packaged parcel, affirms the strength of this unexpected relationship. Yet, much like a poorly addressed letter, the exact nature of this association remains shrouded in mystery. Are Texan postal workers simply seeking refuge from smog-choked skies in the rhythmic hum of postal service machines, or are they engaging in a form of resistance training against the weight of ever-increasing mail volumes, buoyed by the power of puns and wordplay? The answers elude us, much like a mail delivery in the midst of a chaotic holiday season.

As our research draws to a close, we must acknowledge that while our findings raise more questions than they answer, they undeniably add a touch of whimsy to the often staid realm of environmental and labor economics. With a statistically significant p-value punctuating our results, we can confidently assert that the Houston haze and the Texan postal praise are engaged in a captivating dance that defies easy explanation.

In light of these enlightening and entertaining discoveries, we assert that no further research in this area is needed, as the enthralling intersection of air pollution and postal service machinery in Texas has been thoroughly illuminated. With this, we eagerly await future studies that uncover similarly unexpected connections, reminding us all that in research, the most whimsical correlations can lead to the most enduring revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Health and Occupational Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Southern Atmosphere and Occupational Health (CSAOH)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Houston Haze and Texan Postal Praise: The Link Between Air Pollution and Postal Service Machine Operators in Texas with an abstract of This research delves into the intriguing correlation between air pollution levels in Houston and the number of postal service machine operators employed in the vast expanse of Texas. Through the painstaking analysis of data sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9037925 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were unearthed for the time span of 2003 to 2022. As the astute reader may discern, the deleterious effects of air pollution appear to surprisingly coincide with an uptick in the demand for individuals proficient in operating postal service machines. Whether this reflects a desire to expedite mail delivery to escape the polluted air or a novel form of resistance training necessitated by handling increased postage due to online shopping remains an enigma. Our findings raise more questions than they answer, as the intriguing dance between environmental factors and labor demands in the Lone Star State continues to baffle and amuse.

ChatGPT:

Houston air pollution, Texas postal service, postal service machine operators, air pollution correlation, environmental impact on labor demand, Houston pollution levels, Texas labor statistics, postal service machine operation employment, environmental factors and labor, Texas air quality analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Houston
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Houston

The number of postal service machine operators in Texas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of postal service mail sorters, processors, and processing machine operators in Texas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of postal service machine operators in Texas

Correlation r = 0.9037925 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8168409 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of postal service machine operators in Texas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Houston) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.71E-8. 0.0000000470880648130981260000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 4.71E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 21,236,804 random variables You don't actually need 21 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Houston (Bad air quality days)78.082274.043785.950483.013783.013775.342571.232966.575370.958964.480956.986359.72660.547955.191349.58954.246652.876752.732261.369969.3151
The number of postal service machine operators in Texas (Laborers)152401423013660135301332012650106809410899082907610762069506880687064106290625068307530




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([78.0822,74.0437,85.9504,83.0137,83.0137,75.3425,71.2329,66.5753,70.9589,64.4809,56.9863,59.726,60.5479,55.1913,49.589,54.2466,52.8767,52.7322,61.3699,69.3151,])
array_2 = np.array([15240,14230,13660,13530,13320,12650,10680,9410,8990,8290,7610,7620,6950,6880,6870,6410,6290,6250,6830,7530,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Houston"
array_2_name = "The number of postal service machine operators in Texas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 5491 · Black Variable ID: 20720 · Red Variable ID: 14861
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0